전체메뉴
검색
Article Search

JMB Journal of Microbiolog and Biotechnology

QR Code QR Code

Research article


References

  1. Sabina Y, Rahman A, Ray RC, Montet D. 2011. Yersinia enterocolitica: mode of transmission, molecular insights of virulence, and pathogenesis of infection. J. Pathog. 2011: 429069.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  2. Bottone EJ. 1997. Yersinia enterocolitica: the charisma continues. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10: 257-276.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  3. Bancerz-Kisiel A, Szczerba-Turek A, Platt-Samoraj A, Michalczyk M, Szweda W. 2018. Characterisation of ail-positive Yersinia enterocolitica of different biotypes using HRMA. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 269: 46-51.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Bottone EJ. 2015. Yersinia enterocolitica: revisitation of an enduring human pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Newslett. 37: 1-8.
    CrossRef
  5. Fabrega A, Vila J. 2012. Yersinia enterocolitica: pathogenesis, virulence and antimicrobial resistance. Enferm. Infect. Microbiol. Clin. 30: 24-32.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Whitfield C, Williams DM, Kelly SD. 2020. Lipopolysaccharide O-antigens-bacterial glycans made to measure. J. Biol. Chem. 295: 10593-10609.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  7. Knirel Y, Valvano M. Bacterial Lipopolysaccharides. Vienna: Springer 2011: 1-20.
    CrossRef
  8. Liu B, Furevi A, Perepelov AV, Guo X, Cao H, Wang Q, et al. 2020. Structure and genetics of Escherichia coli O antigens. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 44: 655-683.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  9. Raymond CK, Sims EH, Kas A, Spencer DH, Kutyavin TV, Ivey RG, et al. 2002. Genetic variation at the O-antigen biosynthetic locus in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 184: 3614-3622.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  10. Liu B, Knirel YA, Feng L, Perepelov AV, Senchenkova SN, Reeves PR, et al. 2014. Structural diversity in Salmonella O antigens and its genetic basis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 38: 56-89.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Islam ST, Lam JS. 2014. Synthesis of bacterial polysaccharides via the Wzx/Wzy-dependent pathway. Can. J. Microbiol. 60: 697-716.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Greenfield LK, Whitfield C. 2012. Synthesis of lipopolysaccharide O-antigens by ABC transporter-dependent pathways. Carbohydr. Res. 356: 12-24.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Gorshkova RP, Kalmykova EN, Isakov VV, Ovodov YS. 1985. Structural studies on O-specific polysaccharides of lipopolysaccharides from Yersinia enterocolitica serovars O:1,2a,3, O:2a,2b,3 and O:3. Eur. J. Biochem. 150: 527-531.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Gorshkova RP, Kalmykova EN, Isakov VV, Ovodov YS. 1986. Structural studies on O-specific polysaccharides of lipopolysaccharides from Yersinia enterocolitica serovars O:5 and O:5,27. Eur. J. Biochem. 156: 391-397.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Kalmykova EN, Gorshkova RP, Isakov VV, Ovodov I.uS. 1988. The structure of O-specific polysaccharide from Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:6.31 lipopolysaccharide. Bioorg. Khim. 14: 652-657.
  16. Zhang L, Radziejewska-Lebrecht J, Krajewska-Pietrasik D, Toivanen P, Skurnik M. 1997. Molecular and chemical characterization of the lipopolysaccharide O-antigen and its role in the virulence of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:8. Mol. Microbiol. 23: 63-76.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Caroff M, Bundle DR, Perry MB. 1984. Structure of the O-chain of the phenol-phase soluble cellular lipopolysaccharide of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9. Eur. J. Biochem. 139: 195-200.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Gorshkova RP, Isakov VV, Kalmykova EN, Ovodov YS. 1995. Structural studies of O-specific polysaccharide chains of the lipopolysaccharide from Yersinia Enterocolitica serovar O:10. Carbohydr. Res. 268: 249-255.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Garzetti D, Susen R, Fruth A, Tietze E, Heesemann J, Rakin A. 2014. A molecular scheme for Yersinia enterocolitica patho-serotyping derived from genome-wide analysis. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 304: 275-283.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Skurnik M, Bengoechea JA. 2003. The biosynthesis and biological role of lipopolysaccharide O-antigens of pathogenic yersiniae. Carbohydr. Res. 338: 2521-2529.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Skurnik M, Venho R, Toivanen P, al-Hendy A. 1995. A novel locus of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O3 involved in lipopolysaccharide outer core biosynthesis. Mol. Microbiol. 17: 575-594.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Jacobsen NR, Bogdanovich T, Skurnik M, Lubeck PS, Ahrens P, Hoorfar J. 2005. A real-time PCR assay for the specific identification of serotype O:9 of Yersinia enterocolitica. J. Microbiol. Methods 63: 151-156.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Rusak LA, de Castro Lisboa Pereira R, Freitag IG, Hofer CB, Hofer E, Asensi MD, et al. 2018. Rapid detection of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:3 using a duplex PCR assay. J. Microbiol. Methods 154: 107-111.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Bottone EJ. 1999. Yersinia enterocolitica: overview and epidemiologic correlates. Microbes Infect. 1: 323-333.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Hunter E, Greig DR, Schaefer U, Wright MJ, Dallman TJ, McNally A, Jenkins C. 2019. Identification and typing of Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis isolated from human clinical specimens in England between 2004 and 2018. J. Med. Microbiol. 68: 538-548.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Bengoechea JA, Najdenski H, Skurnik M. 2004. Lipopolysaccharide O antigen status of Yersinia enterocolitica O:8 is essential for virulence and absence of O antigen affects the expression of other Yersinia virulence factors. Mol. Microbiol. 52: 451-469.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. al-Hendy A, Toivanen P, Skurnik M. 1992. Lipopolysaccharide O side chain of Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 is an essential virulence factor in an orally infected murine model. Infect. Immun. 60: 870-875.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  28. Seabaugh JA, Anderson DM. 2024. Pathogenicity and virulence of Yersinia. Virulence 15: 2316439.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  29. Felek S, Krukonis ES. 2009. The Yersinia pestis Ail protein mediates binding and Yop delivery to host cells required for plague virulence. Infect. Immun. 77: 825-836.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  30. Grützkau A, Hanski C, Hahn H, Riecken EO. 1990. Involvement of M cells in the bacterial invasion of Peyer's patches: a common mechanism shared by Yersinia enterocolitica and other enteroinvasive bacteria. Gut 31: 1011-1015.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  31. Schmid Y, Grassl GA, Buhler OT, Skurnik M, Autenrieth IB, Bohn E. 2004. Yersinia enterocolitica adhesin A induces production of interleukin-8 in epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 72: 6780-6789.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  32. Tennant SM, Skinner NA, Joe A, Robins-Browne RM. 2005. Homologues of insecticidal toxin complex genes in Yersinia enterocolitica biotype 1A and their contribution to virulence. Infect. Immun. 73: 6860-6867.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  33. Gierczyński R. 2000. Evaluation of the usefulness of selected virulence markers for identification of virulent Yersinia enterocolitica strains. II. Genotypic markers associated with the pYV plasmid. Med. Dosw Mikrobiol. 52: 35-49.
  34. Peruzy MF, Murru N, Perugini AG, Capuano F, Delibato E, Mercogliano R, et al. 2017. Evaluation of virulence genes in Yersinia enterocolitica strains using SYBR green real-time PCR. Food Microbiol. 65: 231-235.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Platt-Samoraj A, Syczylo K, Szczerba-Turek A, Bancerz-Kisiel A, Jablonski A, Labuc S, et al. 2017. Presence of ail and ystB genes in Yersinia enterocolitica biotype 1A isolates from game animals in Poland. Vet. J. 221: 11-13.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Wannet WJ, Reessink M, Brunings HA, Maas HM. 2001. Detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica by a rapid and sensitive duplex PCR assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 4483-4486.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  37. Hassanzadeh P, Ghasemzadeh Limoee E, Nouri Gharajalar S. 2022. Molecular detection, biotyping and serotyping of Yersinia enterocolitica isolated from chicken livers in Tabriz. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 83: 101777.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18: 821-829.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  39. Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30: 2068-2069.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. Boratyn GM, Camacho C, Cooper PS, Coulouris G, Fong A, Ma N, et al. 2013. BLAST: a more efficient report with usability improvements. Nucleic Acids Res. 41(Web Server issue): W29-W33.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  41. Liu Y, Xu T, Wang Q, Huang J, Zhu Y, Liu X, et al. 2022. Vibrio cholerae senses human enteric alpha-defensin 5 through a CarSR twocomponent system to promote bacterial pathogenicity. Commun. Biol. 5: 559.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  42. Wang J, Xu Y, Qin C, Hu J, Yin J, Guo X. 2021. Structural determination and genetic identification of the O-antigen from an Escherichia coli strain, LL004, representing a novel serogroup. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22: 12746.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  43. Xie J, Chen Y, Cai G, Cai R, Hu Z, Wang H. 2023. Tree visualization by one table (tvBOT): a web application for visualizing, modifying and annotating phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 51: W587-W592.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  44. Cornelis GR, Sluiters C, Delor I, Geib D, Kaniga K, Lambert de Rouvroit C, et al. 1991. ymoA, a Yersinia enterocolitica chromosomal gene modulating the expression of virulence functions. Mol. Microbiol. 5: 1023-1034.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  45. Thomson NR, Howard S, Wren BW. 2006. The complete genome sequence and comparative genome analysis of the high pathogenicity Yersinia enterocolitica strain 8081. PLoS Genet. 2: e206.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  46. Young GM, Badger JL, Miller VL. 2000. Motility is required to initiate host cell invasion by Yersinia enterocolitica. Infect. Immun. 68: 4323-4326.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  47. Brem D, Pelludat C, Rakin A, Jacobi CA, Heesemann J. 2001. Functional analysis of yersiniabactin transport genes of Yersinia enterocolitica. Microbiology (Reading) 147: 1115-1127.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  48. Haller JC, Carlson S, Pederson KJ, Pierson DE. 2000. A chromosomally encoded type III secretion pathway in Yersinia enterocolitica is important in virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 36: 1436-1446.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  49. Turkovicova L, Smidak R, Jung G, Turna J, Lubec G, Aradska J. 2016. Proteomic analysis of the TerC interactome: novel links to tellurite resistance and pathogenicity. J. Proteomics 136: 167-173.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. Samuel G, Reeves P. 2003. Biosynthesis of O-antigens: genes and pathways involved in nucleotide sugar precursor synthesis and Oantigen assembly. Carbohydr. Res. 338: 2503-2519.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. Feng L, Senchenkova SN, Yang J, Shashkov AS, Tao J, Guo H, et al. 2004. Synthesis of the heteropolysaccharide O antigen of Escherichia coli O52 requires an ABC transporter: structural and genetic evidence. J. Bacteriol. 186: 4510-4519.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  52. Vinogradov E, Frirdich E, MacLean LL, Perry MB, Petersen BO, Duus JO, et al. 2002. Structures of lipopolysaccharides from Klebsiella pneumoniae. Eluicidation of the structure of the linkage region between core and polysaccharide O chain and identification of the residues at the non-reducing termini of the O chains. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 25070-25081.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  53. Whitfield C, Trent MS. 2014. Biosynthesis and export of bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 83: 99-128.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  54. King JD, Berry S, Clarke BR, Morris RJ, Whitfield C. 2014. Lipopolysaccharide O antigen size distribution is determined by a chain extension complex of variable stoichiometry in Escherichia coli O9a. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111: 6407-6412.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  55. Kenyon JJ, Cunneen MM, Reeves PR. 2017. Genetics and evolution of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis O-specific polysaccharides: a novel pattern of O-antigen diversity. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 41: 200-217.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  56. Chen Y, Bystricky P, Adeyeye J, Panigrahi P, Ali A, Johnson JA, et al. 2007. The capsule polysaccharide structure and biogenesis for non-O1 Vibrio cholerae NRT36S: genes are embedded in the LPS region. BMC Microbiol. 7: 20.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  57. Guo X, Liu B, Chen M, Wang Y, Wang L, Chen H, Wang Y, et al. 2017. Genetic and serological identification of three Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains as candidates for novel provisional O serotypes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 245: 53-58.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  58. Gierczyński R. 2000. Evaluation of the usefulness of selected virulence markers for identification of virulent strains of Yersinia enterocolitica strains. III. Chromosome markers of virulence. Med. Dosw Mikrobiol. 52: 51-65.
  59. Bhagat N, Virdi JS. 2007. Distribution of virulence-associated genes in Yersinia enterocolitica biovar 1A correlates with clonal groups and not the source of isolation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 266: 177-183.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  60. Hein J, Kempf VA, Diebold J, Bücheler N, Preger S, Horak I, et al. 2000. Interferon consensus sequence binding protein confers resistance against Yersinia enterocolitica. Infect. Immun. 68: 1408-1417.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  61. Brem D, Pelludat C, Rakin A, Jacobi CA, Heesemann J. 2001. Functional analysis of yersiniabactin transport genes of Yersinia enterocolitica. Microbiology (Reading) 147: 1115-1127.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  62. Haller JC, Carlson S, Pederson KJ, Pierson DE. 2000. A chromosomally encoded type III secretion pathway in Yersinia enterocolitica is important in virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 36: 1436-1446.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  63. Venecia K, Young GM. 2005. Environmental regulation and virulence attributes of the Ysa type III secretion system of Yersinia enterocolitica biovar 1B. Infect. Immun. 73: 5961-5977.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  64. Jiang L, Yang W, Jiang X, Yao T, Wang L, Yang B. 2021. Virulence-related O islands in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Gut Microbes 13: 1992237.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  65. Liu B, Qian C, Wu P, Li X, Liu Y, Mu H, et al. 2021. Attachment of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli to host cells reduces O antigen chain length at the infection site that promotes infection. mBio 12: e0269221.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  66. Qian C, Huang M, Du Y, Song J, Mu H, Wei Y, et al. 2021. Chemotaxis and shorter O-antigen chain length contribute to the strong desiccation tolerance of a food-isolated Cronobacter sakazakii strain. Front. Microbiol. 12: 779538.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef

Related articles in JMB

More Related Articles

Article

Research article

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024; 34(8): 1599-1608

Published online August 28, 2024 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2402.02044

Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Functional Identification and Genetic Analysis of O-Antigen Gene Clusters of Food-Borne Pathogen Yersinia enterocolitica O:10 and Other Uncommon Serotypes, Further Revealing Their Virulence Profiles

Bin Hu1†, Jing Wang2†, Linxing Li2†, Qin Wang3, Jingliang Qin2, Yingxin Chi1, Junxiang Yan2, Wenkui Sun1, Boyang Cao2*, and Xi Guo2*

1Shandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 16992 City Ten Road, Jinan 250014, Shandong, P.R. China
2TEDA Institute of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Nankai University, 23 Hongda Street, TEDA, Tianjin 300457, P.R. China
3Disease Prevention and Control Center of Ganzhou District, 27 Xianfu Street, Ganzhou District, Zhangye City, Gansu Province, P.R. China

Correspondence to:Boyang Cao,        boyangcao@nankai.edu.cn
Xi Guo,               guoxi@nankai.edu.cn

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Received: February 26, 2024; Revised: June 9, 2024; Accepted: June 25, 2024

Abstract

Yersinia enterocolitica is a globally distributed food-borne gastrointestinal pathogen. The O-antigen variation-determined serotype is an important characteristic of Y. enterocolitica, allowing intraspecies classification for diagnosis and epidemiology purposes. Among the 11 serotypes associated with human yersiniosis, O:3, O:5,27, O:8, and O:9 are the most prevalent, and their O-antigen gene clusters have been well defined. In addition to the O-antigen, several virulence factors are involved in infection and pathogenesis of Y. enterocolitica strains, and these are closely related to their biotypes, reflecting pathogenic properties. In this study, we identified the O-AGC of a Y. enterocolitica strain WL-21 of serotype O:10, and confirmed its functionality in O-antigen synthesis. Furthermore, we analyzed in silico the putative O-AGCs of uncommon serotypes, and found that the O-AGCs of Y. enterocolitica were divided into two genetic patterns: (1) O-AGC within the hemH-gsk locus, possibly synthesizing the O-antigen via the Wzx/Wzy dependent pathway, and (2) O-AGC within the dcuC-galU-galF locus, very likely assembling the O-antigen via the ABC transporter dependent pathway. By screening the virulence genes against genomes from GenBank, we discovered that strains representing different serotypes were grouped according to different virulence gene profiles, indicating strong links between serotypes and virulence markers and implying an interaction between them and the synergistic effect in pathogenicity. Our study provides a framework for further research on the origin and evolution of O-AGCs from Y. enterocolitica, as well as on differences in virulent mechanisms among distinct serotypes.

Keywords: Yersinia enterocolitica, serotype, O-antigen gene cluster, virulence gene, pathogenicity

Introduction

Yersinia enterocolitica is a Gram-negative, food-borne, zoonotic pathogen with worldwide distribution [1]. It is the causative agent of yersiniosis, which is mainly characterized by gastrointestinal disorders; however, extraintestinal systemic manifestations and septic complications have also been recognized occasionally [2]. According to their biochemical features and pathogenic properties, Y. enterocolitica strains are divided into six biotypes: the highly pathogenic biotype 1B; the weakly pathogenic biotypes 2–5; and the non-pathogenic biotype 1A [3]. In addition, with regard to the antigenic scheme, more than 70 serotypes of Y. enterocolitica have been identified to date [4]. Among these, only 11 serotypes have been reported to be associated with human yersiniosis, with O:3, O:9, O:8 and O:5,27 being the most prevalent, according to clinical evidence [4, 5].

In Gram-negative bacteria, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a major component of the outer membrane. The full LPS molecule includes three structurally distinct regions: the lipid A; an oligosaccharide core; and the O-antigenic polysaccharide (O-antigen) [6]. The O-antigen is made of oligosaccharide repeats (O-units) each consisting of two to eight different monosaccharide residues (heteroglycans) or, in some bacteria, identical sugars (homoglycans)[7]. The O-antigen is the most variable LPS component in terms of composition and structure, and thus provides the molecular basis for serotyping, one of the main useful tools for epidemiological, diagnostic, and phylogenetic purposes [8]. Enzymes involved in O-antigen synthesis are encoded in a number of genes, which are always located within a chromosome-encoded locus, namely, the O-antigen gene cluster (O-AGC), and the high variability of O-antigens results normally from the genetic diversity of O-AGC [9,10]. The synthesis of O-antigen depends on one of two classical pathways: the Wzx/Wzy dependent pathway [11] and the ABC transporter (Wzm/Wzt) dependent pathway [12].

The O-antigen chemical structures have been reported for several Y. enterocolitica serotypes, including O:1 to O:3, O:5,27, O:6, and O:8 to O:10 [13-18], and the O-AGCs are known for serotypes O:3, O:9, O:8, O:5 and O:5,27 [19]. In serotype O:8, the O-AGC is located between the hemH and gsk genes. In other serotypes, however, the hemH-gsk locus is occupied by the outer core gene cluster, and the O-AGCs are located elsewhere, always along with several transposase genes; this probably indicates a hotspot region of lateral gene transfer [20, 21]. Since serotyping is one of the main characteristics of Y. enterocolitica, a number of PCR-based methods have been developed for the detection of clinically prevalent serotypes of Y. enterocolitica with higher efficiency and specificity based on the comprehensive elucidation of their O-AGCs [19, 22, 23]. In addition to the main serotypes which are strongly associated with human infection, a few minor serotypes have also been reported as causal agents in sporadic cases [24, 25].

Besides the O-antigen that has been demonstrated to be a virulence factor in Y. enterocolitica [26, 27], pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains harbor many other chromosome- and plasmid-encoded virulence determinants that are essential for pathogenesis [28]. The main chromosomal virulence genes include the following: ail, encoding the protein which plays a key role during attachment and invasion processes, and which also confers serum resistance [29]; inv, whose product is required in the early phase of infection [30]; myfA, encoding a fibrillar submit of Myf, an important factor at the beginning of infection [31]; and yst, encoding an enterotoxin [32]. In addition, several genes located within a virulence plasmid, pYV, are directly involved in the pathogenicity of Y. enterocolitica, including yadA, encoding Yersinia adhesin, and the yop virulon genes, encoding a type III secretion system (T3SS), namely, Ysc-Yops, translocator YopB/D, control element YopN, and effector YopE/H/M/O/P/T [33]. Normally, high-virulence strains of biotypes 1B and low-virulence strains of biotypes 2–5 carry the chromosome-encoded virulence markers ail, inv, and ystA, in addition to pYV, for their full virulence expression. In contrast, nonvirulent strains belonging to biotype 1A lack pYV-encoding virulence factors, but mainly possess ystB, another type of yst gene [19]. Many studies showed that Y. enterocolitica strains of different biotypes exhibit disparate pathogenic properties and virulence profiles [34-36]. However, the link between serotypes and virulence gene distribution in Y. enterocolitica has not yet been reported.

During the routine epidemiological surveillance, a Y. enterocolitica strain, which was numbered WL-21, was isolated from the stool sample of a chicken by the Shandong Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. Further agglutination test by using antisera (provided by Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention) showed that WL-21 was serotype O:10, and biotyping test according to a previous study [37] showed that this isolate belonged to biotype 1A. As an uncommon serotype, neither the O-AGC nor the virulence patterns of O:10 was revealed. The first objective of the present study was to characterize the O-AGC of WL-21, and certify its role in O-antigen synthesis. Secondly, through comprehensive in silico analysis of the O-AGCs, we produced a blueprint that may contribute to elucidating the origin and evolution of O-AGC in Y. enterocolitica. Finally, we sought to recognize any interactions between O-antigen and other virulence factors in the pathogenicity of Y. enterocolitica.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, and Growth Conditions

Details of WL-21 and its derivatives, plasmids, and primers which were used in this study are given in Table 1. All strains used for sequencing and gene manipulation were cultured in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium at 30°C. When necessary, the cultures were supplemented with chloramphenicol (25 μg/ml).

Table 1 . Strains, plasmids, and primers used in this study..

Strain/plasmid/primerDescription
Strain
WL-21Yersinia enterocolitica 1A/O:10
WL-21ΔwzmWL-21 wzm gene deletion
WL-21Δwzm::wzmWL-21Δwzm complemented with pBAD33-wzm
S-17Escherichia coli S17-1/λpir strain
Plasmid
pRE112Allelic exchange vector with sacB, chloramphenicol resistant
pRE112-updownpRE112 fused with WL-21 wzm up- and down- homologous sequences
pBAD33araC, promoter PBAD, chloramphenicol resistant
pBAD33-wzmpBAD33 inserted with WL-21 wzm gene
PrimerNucleotide sequences (5'-3')a
112FTACACTCGTTAGCATTTACCAGCACCCTGATAAATGCTTCAATAATGG, forward primer for pRE112 linearization
112RTACAGCGGCTCCTACTGAGGGTCAACAGCTCATTTCAGAATGG, reverse primer for pRE112 linearization
upFCCATTATTGAAGCATTTATCAGGGTGCTGGTAAATGCTAACGAGTGTA, forward primer for wzy upload sequence
upRCTGAACCCACATAGGTAGAATAGATACACGAGCCACAGAGGTCCAAG, reverse primer for wzy upload sequence
downFCTTGGACCTCTGTGGCTCGTGTATCTATTCTACCTATGTGGGTTCAG, forward primer for wzy download sequence
downRCCATTCTGAAATGAGCTGTTGACCCTCAGTAGGAGCCGCTGTA, reverse primer for wzy download sequence
wzm-cFCGGGGTACCAGGAGGAAAAGTGAAAGAGATGTTATTAGCGAT, forward primer for wzm cloning, digested with KnpI
wzm-cRCCCAAGCTTTCATAATTCATCTACCATATCTTTG, reverse primer for wzm cloning, digested with HindIII

aBoldface characters indicate the Shine–Dalgarno box, and restriction sites are in italics..



LB medium (Cat. no. R20214) and chloramphenicol (Cat. no. S17022) were purchased from YuanYe Bio-Technology Co., Ltd. (China). The DNA extraction kit (Cat. no. DP302-02) was purchased from Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd. (China). High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Cat. no. M0530S), restriction enzymes (Cat. nos. R3142V and R3104V) and T4 DNA ligase (Cat. no. M0202V) were purchased from New England Biolab (USA). Sucrose (Cat. no. A610498), L-arabinose (Cat. no. A610071), and reagents for LPS preparation and sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) were purchased from Sangon Co., Ltd. (China). Primers were synthesized by Genewiz (China).

Genome Sequencing and Annotation

The genomic DNA of Y. enterocolitica strain WL-21 was extracted from 5 ml of the overnight bacterial culture. Then, the genomic DNA was sheared, polished, and prepared using the Nextera XT DNA library prep kit (Illumina, USA). Genomic libraries containing 500-bp paired-end inserts were constructed, and sequencing was then performed using Solexa sequencing technologies (Illumina) to produce approximately 100-fold coverage. The obtained reads were assembled using the de novo genome assembly program Velvet to generate a multi-contig draft genome [38]. For gene prediction and annotation, Prokka (v1.12) was used [39], and for additional annotation, the assembled sequences were searched against GenBank non-redundant (NR), UniProt, and Pfam database using BLAST (v2.5.0+) [40]. The TMHMM v2.0 analysis program (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-2.0/) was used to identify potential transmembrane domains within the protein sequences. The sequence data were submitted to GenBank under accession number PP132002. Meanwhile, the genome sequence of a strain IP2222 (O:36) was downloaded from GenBank (GCA_000285015.1) and annotated using the above procedures.

Construction of Plasmids and Strains

Gene deletion in the WL-21 chromosome was performed according to a two-step homologous recombination with pRE112 containing the sacB counter-selectable marker, as described previously [41]. The upstream and downstream fragments of the wzm gene were amplified from the WL-21 genome using primer pairs upF/upR and downF/downR. Next, the two fragments were combined with each other using primers upF and downR, followed by fusion with the linearized pRE112 to yield the suicide plasmid pRE112-updown, which was introduced into the S-17 strain by electroporation, generating the donor strain S-17-pRE112-updown. For conjugation, S-17-pRE112-updown and the recipient strain WL-21 were grown at 30°C with shaking overnight. Then, the cultures were diluted as a ratio of 1:100 into fresh LB medium and incubated at 30°C with shaking until the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) reached approximately 0.6. Next, the donor and the recipient strains were mixed at a ratio of 3:1 (v/v), and the mixture was resuspended in 100 μl of LB medium and was spotted on a LB plate with incubation at 30°C for 48h. After conjugation, the cells were collected and transferred to chloramphenicol containing LB plate to screen for clones via a single crossover event. The growing clones were then transferred into fresh LB medium and incubated at 30°C overnight to induce the second homologous recombination. The overnight culture was diluted and spread on LB plates containing 10% sucrose and grown at 30°C for 24 h. Finally, the resultant clones were transferred onto LB plates and LB plates with chloramphenicol simultaneously, and clones sensitive to chloramphenicol were selected and confirmed by PCR and sequencing.

For the complementation test, the wzm gene was amplified from the WL-21 genome using primers wzm-cF and wzm-cR. The PCR fragment was digested with restriction enzymes KpnI and HindIII, and the digested fragment was cloned into pBAD33, which was also treated with the same enzymes, resulting in plasmid pBAD33-wzm. Expression of the cloned wzm gene is under the control of the PBAD promoter, which could be activated by arabinose. Then, pBAD33-wzm was introduced into WL-21Δwzm by electroporation, generating the complementary strain WL-21Δwzm::wzm.

LPS Extraction and SDS-PAGE Analysis

Strains were grown overnight at 22°C with shaking, and cultures were diluted into 20 ml of fresh LB broth at a ratio of 1:100 and incubated at 22°C to mid-log phase at a final OD600 = 0.8. To induce wzm expression under the control of pBAD33, L-arabinose (0.5 mg/ml) was added to cultures at the OD600 = 0.4, and the cultures were incubated continuously to mid-log phase at the OD600 = 0.8. Then, LPS used for SDS-PAGE analysis was prepared using the hot aqueous-phenol method, as previously described [42]. The extracted LPSs were separated using 12%SDS-PAGE at 50 V for 30 min and 100 V for 2 h; subsequently, they were visualized by silver staining using the Fast Silver Stain Kit (Cat. no. P0017S; Beyotime, China), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The gel image was captured using a GS900 calibrated densitometer (BioRad Laboratories, USA).

Analysis of Putative O-AGCs and Virulence Marker Profiles

Genomes of those isolates with the serotypes assigned to by the other submitters were downloaded from the GenBank database. Putative O-AGCs of serotypes were characterized using the in-house Bacterial Surface Polysaccharide Gene Database. In general, query genome sequences in GenBank format were searched against the database using BLASTp with the cutoff %coverage > 60 and %identity > 30. An O-AGC candidate could be defined using the following criteria: (1) the smallest number of successive genes is six; (2) the number of successive genes annotated “No hits” is no more than three; and (3) there must be glycosyl transferase gene(s), in addition to wzm/wzt or at least one of wzx and wzy genes. Schematic diagram of genes (Fig. 3) was generated using ChiPlot [43].

Figure 3. Representation of the O-antigen genetic clusters that have not been reported previously from uncommon serotypes. Gene names are given (where possible) for the schematic of each serotype, as well as the genetic locus tag of each strain being provided. Serotype names are indicated on the left, with strain names in the brackets. The O-antigen structures of O:1, O:2, O:3 [13], and O10 [18] are also shown. Regions conserved between strains are indicated as light pink blocks. aThe O:3 antigen gene cluster is drawn from nucleotide sequence under accession number Z118920; bThe genome of IP2222 (O:36) was annotated in this study; *Truncated gene.

The downloaded genome sequences, along with that of WL-21, were also compared with the selected virulence genes, including ail [29], inv [30], myfA [31], ystA/B [32], yadA and yop virulon [33], ymoA [44], yplA [45], fliA and flh/C/D [46], fyuA and ybtP/Q [47], and ysa genes [48], which have been identified previously. Nucleotide sequences were compared using BLASTn, and genes with >90% coverage match and >85% identity match were classified as present. Isolates were clustered according to their virulence profiles, and the pattern was visualized by ChiPlot [43].

Results and Discussion

The Putative O-AGC of WL-21 Correlates Well with the O-Antigen Structure of Y. enterocolitica O:10

The putative O-AGC of WL-21 is 16,137 bp in length, and consists of 11 open reading frames (orfs). These orfs were located between the dcuC and galU-galF genes, and the transcribed direction of orf2 to 11 was from dcuC to galU, with the exception of orf1 just downstream of dcuC (Fig. 1), in line with the evidence for O:3 and very similar to that for O:9.

Figure 1. Representation of the O-antigen genetic cluster of Y. enterocolitica WL-21, with the O-antigen structure of serotype O:10 [18] shown at the top (left), as well as the outer core gene cluster (right).

Details of proposed functions of the 11 orfs were summarized in Table 2. Orf1, a TerC family protein (Pfam03741), was assigned to the function of transporter in O:3 and O:8. TerC protein may be implicated in resistance to tellurium [49]; however, no involvement of this protein in O-antigen synthesis has yet been reported. Orf2, 3, 8, and 9 were annotated as mannose-1-phosphate guanylyltransferase (ManC), phosphoglucomutase (ManB), GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase (Gmd), and GDP-6-deoxy-D-talose 4-dehydrogenase (Rmd), respectively. These four enzymes, along with mannose-6-phosphate isomerase (ManA), whose coding gene is always outside the O-AGC, are responsible for the synthesis of GDP-D-rhamnose (GDP-D-Rhap), the nucleotide precursor of D-Rhap [50]. This is consistent with the existence of D-Rhap, which is the only sugar component in the backbone of O:10-antigen. Orf4 and 5 were proposed as the ABC transporter permease (Wzm) and the ABC transporter ATP-binding protein (Wzt), respectively, suggesting that it is very likely that the O-antigen of WL-21 was generated via the ABC transporter dependent pathway. orf6, just downstream of wzt, was annotated a methyltransferase gene. This is very common in O-AGCs containing wzm/wzt genes, and its function has been identified as adding a methyl group to the non-reducing terminus of the O-antigen, thus halting polymerization and regulating chain length [51, 52]. Finally, Orf7, 10, and 11 were all recognized as glycosyl transferases. These enzymes could presumably be involved in the sequential transfer of GDP-D-Rhap to D-Rhap polymers, forming the backbone, and the transfer of L-xylulose (L-Xulf) to D-Rhap, forming the side-chain linkage L-Xulf-(β2→2)-D-Rhap. However, the exact functions of these glycosyl transferases should be confirmed biochemically in the future.

Table 2 . Details of proposed functions of the putative WL-21 O-AGC..

orf No.Gene nameSpecies (Accession No.)% Identical/% SimilarPutative function of protein
1orf1Y. enterocolitica (WP_005168322.1)99/100TerC family protein
2manCY. enterocolitica (WP_076707092.1)98/99Mannose-1-phosphate guanylyltransferase/ mannose-6-phosphate isomerase
3manBY. enterocolitica (WP_077174857.1)99/100Phosphomannomutase
4wzmY. enterocolitica (WP_260505577.1)90/96ABC transporter permease
5wztY. enterocolitica (WP_221866130.1)91/95ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
6ubiGY. enterocolitica (WP_221866131.1)70/81Class I SAM-dependent methyltransferase
7gtr1Y. enterocolitica (WP_221866132.1 )79/89Glycosyltransferase family 1 protein
8gmdY. enterocolitica (WP_221866133.1 )98/99GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase
9rmdY. enterocolitica (WP_076707088.1 )93/96GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase
10gtr2Y. enterocolitica (WP_076707087.1 )88/94Glycosyltransferase family 1 protein
11gtr3HDL6886110.1 )93/97Glycosyltransferase family 4 protein


We also observed the hemH-gsk locus at the WL-21 genome (Fig. 1), within which the genetic organization was identical to the outer core gene clusters of O:3 and O:9. This finding also indicated that the genetic elements between dcuC and galU-galF were the candidates for WL-21 O-antigen synthesis genes.

Deletion and Complementation Test Confirmed the Functionality of WL-21 O-AGC

To confirm the role of dcuC-galU-galF locus in O-antigen synthesis, a wzm knockout strain WL-21Δwzm was constructed. As can obviously be seen in the LPS profile, the WL-21 wide-type strain exhibited a complete LPS, while WL-21Δwzm only generated an O-antigen-depleted LPS (Fig. 2). Within the ABC transporter dependent pathway, the translocation of O-antigen is mediated by the integral membrane protein (Wzm)/hydrophilic protein complex (Wzt) [53]. Therefore, WL-21Δwzm lost the ability to produce the Wzm/Wzt complex for O-antigen translocation, thus only the lipid A-core band was generated without O-antigen. Moreover, the complete LPS profile could be restored from the wzm complemented strain, WL-21Δwzm::wzm. However, we noticed that the chain-length of O-anitgen increased slightly in WL-21Δwzm::wzm compared to that in the wide type strain (Fig. 2). There is no clear-cut explanation, as polysaccharide structural studies always tend to focus on repeating units, rather than chain-length regulation. A study demonstrated that in Escherichia coli O9a, a prototype for the biosynthesis of O-antigens by the ABC transporter dependent pathway, the occurrence of distinct chain-length of O-antigens was dependent on the relative concentration of two enzymes, the glycosyl transferase WbdA and the bifunctional kinase–methyl transferase WbdD [54]. As a methyltransferase UbiG and three glycosyl transferases were also annotated in WL21, we propose that there might be similar chain-length regulating mechanism in Y. enterocolitica. Together, these results still proved that the dcuC-galU-galF locus is the O-AGC of WL21, and that the WL21 O-antigen is synthesized by the ABC transporter dependent pathway.

Figure 2. LPS profiles of WL21 and its derivatives. LPS extracts were electrophoresed on sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels, and stained by silver staining. Lane 1, WL21 wide-type strain; lane 2, WL-21Δwzm; and lane 3, WL-21Δwzm::wzm.

The Putative O-AGCs of Most Y. enterocolitica Are Generally Divided into Two Genetic Patterns

A total of 137 Y. enterocolitica isolates from GenBank were assigned to certain serotypes by the submitters, the majority of which are prevalent serotypes with their O-AGCs being reported before this study: 41 for serotype O:3, eight for serotype O:5, 17 for serotype O:5,27, ten for serotype O:8, and 31 for serotype O:9. The remainder are isolates with uncharacterized O-AGCs, including isolates of serotypes O:1, O:2, O:4, O:6, O:7, O:13, O:19, O:21, and O:36. We next derived the putative O-AGCs from their genomes. Our analysis indicated that (1) isolates with the same serotype possess identical genetic organization within the putative O-AGC; and (2) most serotypes exhibit unique O-AGC profiles with the exception of O:1, O:2, O:7 and O:19.

Consequently, we selected one isolate within each serotype as a type strain for further analysis and found the genetic loci of these O-AGCs exhibited two patterns: within the hemH-gsk locus or somewhere else (Fig. 3). In addition, the O-AGCs shared by O:1 and O:2 were similar to that of O:3, and their O-AGCs were located between or adjacent to insertion sequence (IS), as was also the case in O:5 and O:5,27. Another common feature of the above-mentioned serotypes, along with O:9 and O:10 (strain WL-21 in this study), is that the O-AGCs were all located outside the hemH-gsk locus, and that their O-antigens seem to be synthesized by the ABC transporter dependent pathway. The putative O-AGCs of serotypes O:4, O:7/O:19, O:13, and O:21 were all mapped between hemH and gsk, as was also the case with O:8, and genes in each serotype were transcribed from hemH to gsk. However, in the case of O:36, the putative O-AGC genes were located between hemH and gsk, with the exception of four genes which were upstream of hemH and transcribed in the opposite direction. Another probably shared characteristic of these serotypes was that they produce their O-antigens via the Wzx/Wzy dependent pathway, except in the case of O:7/O:19. In particular, all strains of the latter pattern had a DDH sugar synthesis gene set which was present at the 5’ end within their O-AGCs (Fig. 3). All these features resembled those found in Y. pseudotuberculosis [55]. This evidence implied that the O-AGCs of Y. enterocolitica serotypes with hemH-gsk patterns, and those of Y. pseudotuberculosis, very likely originated from a common ancestor, followed by separate evolutionary events under the pressure of different niches, whereas the O-AGCs with the wzm/wzt gene set underwent a distinct evolutionary history.

Intriguingly, strains of O:7/O:19 possessed wzm/wzt and wzx/wzy simultaneously within their hemH-gsk loci (Fig. 3); this has not been previously reported among the O-AGCs of Y. enterocolitica and other Yersinia species. In a Vibrio cholera strain, the co-location of O-AGC and capsular synthesis genes containing both wzm/wzt and wzx/wzy was revealed, suggesting co-evolution of new O- and capsular-antigens [56]. However, no evidence of capsule has been reported in Y. enterocolitica. Therefore, the elucidation of the O-antigen processing mechanism in O:7/O:19 may arouse more interests in our next study. Another piece of evidence which attracted our attention was that none of the serotype O:6 isolates possessed standard O-AGC; only the outer core gene cluster within the hemH-gsk locus was discovered. In a few species, for example, in Vibrio parahaemolyticus, the O-antigen is deficient in the LPS molecule and the antigenic scheme is based on the variation of core oligosaccharide [57]. Thus, we propose that the antigenic property of O:6 may be determined by its core oligosaccharide, instead of O-antigen. This hypothesis in Y. enterocolitica O:6 could be addressed by fully elucidating the LPS structure.

Strains of Serotypes are Grouped according to Their Virulence Profiles

A total of 138 genomes representing 15 serotypes were investigated for virulence gene screening (Fig. 4). Among these virulence genes, inv, ymoA, yplA, filA, flhC, and filD were distributed in all or almost all isolates; no differences among serotypes were therefore exhibited. According to the pattern of other virulence genes, the 15 serotypes could be clearly divided into three groups: Group 1, consisting of serotypes O:1, O:2, O:3, O:5,27 and O:9; Group 2, mainly composed of serotypes O:5, O:6,30, and a few other minor serotypes including O:10 of this study; and Group 3, with serotype O:8 as its main member, along with O:4, O:21, one strain of O13, and one strain of O7 (Fig. 4).

Figure 4. Virulence profiles of strains with serotypes derived from GenBank data. From left to right: virulence genes, with black indicating presence and white indicating absence; serotype highlighted in different colors; strain name with biotype from meta data if available. aPlasmid-borne genes.

In Group 1, the largest group, all isolates were characterized by the presence of ail and ystA, and the absence of myfA, yadA, ystB, fyuA, ybtP, ybtQ, and yas genes. Clearly, isolates of Group 1 could be further divided into two subgroups: 1a and 1b. Except for serotype O:2 strains which were located in Group 1b, other strains assigned to serotypes O:1, O:3, O:5,27 and O:9 were distributed into two subgroups. Obviously, the two subgroups were differentiated only by the presence/absence of the yop virulon. The yop virulon is the core of Yersinia pathogenicity machinery and is located within the Pyv [33]; unfortunately, it may be lost during prolonged storage, frequent passaging, or temperatures higher than 37°C [58], which, we propose, may lead to the absence of yop virulon in Group 1a. myfA, encoding a factor important for the beginning of infection, was originally found in bioserotype 4/O:3 strains isolated from clinical cases of yersiniosis, as well as some biotype 1A strains from patients with diarrhea [59]; however, no myfA was found in the O:3 strains in this study.

Within Group 2, all isolates possessed ystB instead of ystA, and most isolates possess myfA and yadA, the two genes absent in all isolates of Group 1. While ystB, instead of ystA, is known as a classical virulence marker of biotype 1A strain [19], the strong implication of ystB in serotypes O:5 and O:6, the main members of Group 2, has not been recorded previously. Another feature of Group 2 is that none of the isolates held ail or yop virulons. In contrast to the situation in subgroup 1a, the absence of yop virulon in Group 2 was unlikely to be attributed to the loss of PYv, since none of the Group 2 isolates were yop virulon positive. In terms of clinical manifestation, O:5/O:6 strains may partially or wholly lose the ability to cause the formation of necrotic abscesses; this is mainly mediated by the functionality of Pyv [60].

The main characteristics of Group 3 were that fyuA, ybtP, ybtQ, and yas genes were only present in the relevant isolates of this group, and thus the virulence factors were most abundant. fyuA, ybtP and ybtQ are the most representative genes of a pathogenicity island termed the high-pathogenicity island (HPI), and most of the genes of HPI are involved in the biosynthesis, transport, and regulation of yersiniabactin [61]. In addition, yas genes located within a Ysa pathogenicity island (Ysa-PI) encoding another T3SS play an important role in the colonization of gastrointestinal tissues during the earliest stage of infection [62]. HPI and Ysa-PI have been reported to be present only in Y. enterocolitica biotype 1B, the highly virulent biotype [63]. Our genome-wide analysis also showed that these two PIs were only present in isolates of Group 3 (three of these were assigned to biotype 1B), suggesting that strains of Group 3 must have unique pathogenic characteristics and mechanisms.

Herein, the in silico O-AGC characterization of non-prevalent serotypes provides the genetic basis for the design of novel geno-serotyping targets, and for the development of novel assays for subtyping and epidemiological surveillance. The revealing of different patterns of O-AGC locations indicates that there must be distinct evolutionary route among Y. enterocolitica strains, the mechanism of which needs further investigation. The O-antigen is a key virulence determinant, and its role in the pathogenesis of Y. enterocolitica has also been identified [26, 27]. In particular, the relationship between certain serotypes and specific virulence factors has been investigated in several bacteria species, for instance, in enterohemorrhagic E. coli O157:H7 [64]. Moreover, the regulation role of O-antigen in pathogenic promotion and environmental tolerance has also been confirmed [65, 66]. Here, we revealed a strong association between O-serotypes and the profile of virulence genes in Y. enterocolitica as a whole; this finding, we believe, will advance research into the role of O-antigens and other virulence factors, including their synergistic effect in the pathogenicity of this important food-borne pathogen.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation General Project (grant number ZR2022MH318), the Tianjin Municipal Natural Science Foundation (grant number 17JCYBJC24300), and the National Key Program for Infectious Diseases of China (grant number 2017ZX10303405).

Author Contributions

B.H., J.W., L.L., B.Y.C., Conceptualization; B.H., Investigation; B.H., J.W., Q.W., Y.X.C., J.X.Y., Methodology; J.W., L.L., Q.W., Y.X.C., W.K.S., Formal analysis; J.W., L.L., Writing-Original Draft Preparation; J.L.Q., Software; B.Y.C., X.G., Review& Editing; B.Y.C., X.G., Supervision; B.H., X.G., Funding Acquisition.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Representation of the O-antigen genetic cluster of Y. enterocolitica WL-21, with the O-antigen structure of serotype O:10 [18] shown at the top (left), as well as the outer core gene cluster (right).
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 1599-1608https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2402.02044

Fig 2.

Figure 2.LPS profiles of WL21 and its derivatives. LPS extracts were electrophoresed on sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels, and stained by silver staining. Lane 1, WL21 wide-type strain; lane 2, WL-21Δwzm; and lane 3, WL-21Δwzm::wzm.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 1599-1608https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2402.02044

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Representation of the O-antigen genetic clusters that have not been reported previously from uncommon serotypes. Gene names are given (where possible) for the schematic of each serotype, as well as the genetic locus tag of each strain being provided. Serotype names are indicated on the left, with strain names in the brackets. The O-antigen structures of O:1, O:2, O:3 [13], and O10 [18] are also shown. Regions conserved between strains are indicated as light pink blocks. aThe O:3 antigen gene cluster is drawn from nucleotide sequence under accession number Z118920; bThe genome of IP2222 (O:36) was annotated in this study; *Truncated gene.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 1599-1608https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2402.02044

Fig 4.

Figure 4.Virulence profiles of strains with serotypes derived from GenBank data. From left to right: virulence genes, with black indicating presence and white indicating absence; serotype highlighted in different colors; strain name with biotype from meta data if available. aPlasmid-borne genes.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 1599-1608https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2402.02044

Table 1 . Strains, plasmids, and primers used in this study..

Strain/plasmid/primerDescription
Strain
WL-21Yersinia enterocolitica 1A/O:10
WL-21ΔwzmWL-21 wzm gene deletion
WL-21Δwzm::wzmWL-21Δwzm complemented with pBAD33-wzm
S-17Escherichia coli S17-1/λpir strain
Plasmid
pRE112Allelic exchange vector with sacB, chloramphenicol resistant
pRE112-updownpRE112 fused with WL-21 wzm up- and down- homologous sequences
pBAD33araC, promoter PBAD, chloramphenicol resistant
pBAD33-wzmpBAD33 inserted with WL-21 wzm gene
PrimerNucleotide sequences (5'-3')a
112FTACACTCGTTAGCATTTACCAGCACCCTGATAAATGCTTCAATAATGG, forward primer for pRE112 linearization
112RTACAGCGGCTCCTACTGAGGGTCAACAGCTCATTTCAGAATGG, reverse primer for pRE112 linearization
upFCCATTATTGAAGCATTTATCAGGGTGCTGGTAAATGCTAACGAGTGTA, forward primer for wzy upload sequence
upRCTGAACCCACATAGGTAGAATAGATACACGAGCCACAGAGGTCCAAG, reverse primer for wzy upload sequence
downFCTTGGACCTCTGTGGCTCGTGTATCTATTCTACCTATGTGGGTTCAG, forward primer for wzy download sequence
downRCCATTCTGAAATGAGCTGTTGACCCTCAGTAGGAGCCGCTGTA, reverse primer for wzy download sequence
wzm-cFCGGGGTACCAGGAGGAAAAGTGAAAGAGATGTTATTAGCGAT, forward primer for wzm cloning, digested with KnpI
wzm-cRCCCAAGCTTTCATAATTCATCTACCATATCTTTG, reverse primer for wzm cloning, digested with HindIII

aBoldface characters indicate the Shine–Dalgarno box, and restriction sites are in italics..


Table 2 . Details of proposed functions of the putative WL-21 O-AGC..

orf No.Gene nameSpecies (Accession No.)% Identical/% SimilarPutative function of protein
1orf1Y. enterocolitica (WP_005168322.1)99/100TerC family protein
2manCY. enterocolitica (WP_076707092.1)98/99Mannose-1-phosphate guanylyltransferase/ mannose-6-phosphate isomerase
3manBY. enterocolitica (WP_077174857.1)99/100Phosphomannomutase
4wzmY. enterocolitica (WP_260505577.1)90/96ABC transporter permease
5wztY. enterocolitica (WP_221866130.1)91/95ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
6ubiGY. enterocolitica (WP_221866131.1)70/81Class I SAM-dependent methyltransferase
7gtr1Y. enterocolitica (WP_221866132.1 )79/89Glycosyltransferase family 1 protein
8gmdY. enterocolitica (WP_221866133.1 )98/99GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase
9rmdY. enterocolitica (WP_076707088.1 )93/96GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase
10gtr2Y. enterocolitica (WP_076707087.1 )88/94Glycosyltransferase family 1 protein
11gtr3HDL6886110.1 )93/97Glycosyltransferase family 4 protein

References

  1. Sabina Y, Rahman A, Ray RC, Montet D. 2011. Yersinia enterocolitica: mode of transmission, molecular insights of virulence, and pathogenesis of infection. J. Pathog. 2011: 429069.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  2. Bottone EJ. 1997. Yersinia enterocolitica: the charisma continues. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10: 257-276.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Bancerz-Kisiel A, Szczerba-Turek A, Platt-Samoraj A, Michalczyk M, Szweda W. 2018. Characterisation of ail-positive Yersinia enterocolitica of different biotypes using HRMA. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 269: 46-51.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Bottone EJ. 2015. Yersinia enterocolitica: revisitation of an enduring human pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Newslett. 37: 1-8.
    CrossRef
  5. Fabrega A, Vila J. 2012. Yersinia enterocolitica: pathogenesis, virulence and antimicrobial resistance. Enferm. Infect. Microbiol. Clin. 30: 24-32.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Whitfield C, Williams DM, Kelly SD. 2020. Lipopolysaccharide O-antigens-bacterial glycans made to measure. J. Biol. Chem. 295: 10593-10609.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Knirel Y, Valvano M. Bacterial Lipopolysaccharides. Vienna: Springer 2011: 1-20.
    CrossRef
  8. Liu B, Furevi A, Perepelov AV, Guo X, Cao H, Wang Q, et al. 2020. Structure and genetics of Escherichia coli O antigens. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 44: 655-683.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Raymond CK, Sims EH, Kas A, Spencer DH, Kutyavin TV, Ivey RG, et al. 2002. Genetic variation at the O-antigen biosynthetic locus in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 184: 3614-3622.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Liu B, Knirel YA, Feng L, Perepelov AV, Senchenkova SN, Reeves PR, et al. 2014. Structural diversity in Salmonella O antigens and its genetic basis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 38: 56-89.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Islam ST, Lam JS. 2014. Synthesis of bacterial polysaccharides via the Wzx/Wzy-dependent pathway. Can. J. Microbiol. 60: 697-716.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Greenfield LK, Whitfield C. 2012. Synthesis of lipopolysaccharide O-antigens by ABC transporter-dependent pathways. Carbohydr. Res. 356: 12-24.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Gorshkova RP, Kalmykova EN, Isakov VV, Ovodov YS. 1985. Structural studies on O-specific polysaccharides of lipopolysaccharides from Yersinia enterocolitica serovars O:1,2a,3, O:2a,2b,3 and O:3. Eur. J. Biochem. 150: 527-531.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Gorshkova RP, Kalmykova EN, Isakov VV, Ovodov YS. 1986. Structural studies on O-specific polysaccharides of lipopolysaccharides from Yersinia enterocolitica serovars O:5 and O:5,27. Eur. J. Biochem. 156: 391-397.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Kalmykova EN, Gorshkova RP, Isakov VV, Ovodov I.uS. 1988. The structure of O-specific polysaccharide from Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:6.31 lipopolysaccharide. Bioorg. Khim. 14: 652-657.
  16. Zhang L, Radziejewska-Lebrecht J, Krajewska-Pietrasik D, Toivanen P, Skurnik M. 1997. Molecular and chemical characterization of the lipopolysaccharide O-antigen and its role in the virulence of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:8. Mol. Microbiol. 23: 63-76.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Caroff M, Bundle DR, Perry MB. 1984. Structure of the O-chain of the phenol-phase soluble cellular lipopolysaccharide of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9. Eur. J. Biochem. 139: 195-200.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Gorshkova RP, Isakov VV, Kalmykova EN, Ovodov YS. 1995. Structural studies of O-specific polysaccharide chains of the lipopolysaccharide from Yersinia Enterocolitica serovar O:10. Carbohydr. Res. 268: 249-255.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Garzetti D, Susen R, Fruth A, Tietze E, Heesemann J, Rakin A. 2014. A molecular scheme for Yersinia enterocolitica patho-serotyping derived from genome-wide analysis. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 304: 275-283.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Skurnik M, Bengoechea JA. 2003. The biosynthesis and biological role of lipopolysaccharide O-antigens of pathogenic yersiniae. Carbohydr. Res. 338: 2521-2529.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Skurnik M, Venho R, Toivanen P, al-Hendy A. 1995. A novel locus of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O3 involved in lipopolysaccharide outer core biosynthesis. Mol. Microbiol. 17: 575-594.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Jacobsen NR, Bogdanovich T, Skurnik M, Lubeck PS, Ahrens P, Hoorfar J. 2005. A real-time PCR assay for the specific identification of serotype O:9 of Yersinia enterocolitica. J. Microbiol. Methods 63: 151-156.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Rusak LA, de Castro Lisboa Pereira R, Freitag IG, Hofer CB, Hofer E, Asensi MD, et al. 2018. Rapid detection of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:3 using a duplex PCR assay. J. Microbiol. Methods 154: 107-111.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Bottone EJ. 1999. Yersinia enterocolitica: overview and epidemiologic correlates. Microbes Infect. 1: 323-333.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Hunter E, Greig DR, Schaefer U, Wright MJ, Dallman TJ, McNally A, Jenkins C. 2019. Identification and typing of Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis isolated from human clinical specimens in England between 2004 and 2018. J. Med. Microbiol. 68: 538-548.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Bengoechea JA, Najdenski H, Skurnik M. 2004. Lipopolysaccharide O antigen status of Yersinia enterocolitica O:8 is essential for virulence and absence of O antigen affects the expression of other Yersinia virulence factors. Mol. Microbiol. 52: 451-469.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. al-Hendy A, Toivanen P, Skurnik M. 1992. Lipopolysaccharide O side chain of Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 is an essential virulence factor in an orally infected murine model. Infect. Immun. 60: 870-875.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  28. Seabaugh JA, Anderson DM. 2024. Pathogenicity and virulence of Yersinia. Virulence 15: 2316439.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  29. Felek S, Krukonis ES. 2009. The Yersinia pestis Ail protein mediates binding and Yop delivery to host cells required for plague virulence. Infect. Immun. 77: 825-836.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Grützkau A, Hanski C, Hahn H, Riecken EO. 1990. Involvement of M cells in the bacterial invasion of Peyer's patches: a common mechanism shared by Yersinia enterocolitica and other enteroinvasive bacteria. Gut 31: 1011-1015.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Schmid Y, Grassl GA, Buhler OT, Skurnik M, Autenrieth IB, Bohn E. 2004. Yersinia enterocolitica adhesin A induces production of interleukin-8 in epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 72: 6780-6789.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Tennant SM, Skinner NA, Joe A, Robins-Browne RM. 2005. Homologues of insecticidal toxin complex genes in Yersinia enterocolitica biotype 1A and their contribution to virulence. Infect. Immun. 73: 6860-6867.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Gierczyński R. 2000. Evaluation of the usefulness of selected virulence markers for identification of virulent Yersinia enterocolitica strains. II. Genotypic markers associated with the pYV plasmid. Med. Dosw Mikrobiol. 52: 35-49.
  34. Peruzy MF, Murru N, Perugini AG, Capuano F, Delibato E, Mercogliano R, et al. 2017. Evaluation of virulence genes in Yersinia enterocolitica strains using SYBR green real-time PCR. Food Microbiol. 65: 231-235.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Platt-Samoraj A, Syczylo K, Szczerba-Turek A, Bancerz-Kisiel A, Jablonski A, Labuc S, et al. 2017. Presence of ail and ystB genes in Yersinia enterocolitica biotype 1A isolates from game animals in Poland. Vet. J. 221: 11-13.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Wannet WJ, Reessink M, Brunings HA, Maas HM. 2001. Detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica by a rapid and sensitive duplex PCR assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 4483-4486.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  37. Hassanzadeh P, Ghasemzadeh Limoee E, Nouri Gharajalar S. 2022. Molecular detection, biotyping and serotyping of Yersinia enterocolitica isolated from chicken livers in Tabriz. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 83: 101777.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18: 821-829.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  39. Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30: 2068-2069.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. Boratyn GM, Camacho C, Cooper PS, Coulouris G, Fong A, Ma N, et al. 2013. BLAST: a more efficient report with usability improvements. Nucleic Acids Res. 41(Web Server issue): W29-W33.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  41. Liu Y, Xu T, Wang Q, Huang J, Zhu Y, Liu X, et al. 2022. Vibrio cholerae senses human enteric alpha-defensin 5 through a CarSR twocomponent system to promote bacterial pathogenicity. Commun. Biol. 5: 559.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  42. Wang J, Xu Y, Qin C, Hu J, Yin J, Guo X. 2021. Structural determination and genetic identification of the O-antigen from an Escherichia coli strain, LL004, representing a novel serogroup. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22: 12746.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  43. Xie J, Chen Y, Cai G, Cai R, Hu Z, Wang H. 2023. Tree visualization by one table (tvBOT): a web application for visualizing, modifying and annotating phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 51: W587-W592.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  44. Cornelis GR, Sluiters C, Delor I, Geib D, Kaniga K, Lambert de Rouvroit C, et al. 1991. ymoA, a Yersinia enterocolitica chromosomal gene modulating the expression of virulence functions. Mol. Microbiol. 5: 1023-1034.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  45. Thomson NR, Howard S, Wren BW. 2006. The complete genome sequence and comparative genome analysis of the high pathogenicity Yersinia enterocolitica strain 8081. PLoS Genet. 2: e206.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  46. Young GM, Badger JL, Miller VL. 2000. Motility is required to initiate host cell invasion by Yersinia enterocolitica. Infect. Immun. 68: 4323-4326.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  47. Brem D, Pelludat C, Rakin A, Jacobi CA, Heesemann J. 2001. Functional analysis of yersiniabactin transport genes of Yersinia enterocolitica. Microbiology (Reading) 147: 1115-1127.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  48. Haller JC, Carlson S, Pederson KJ, Pierson DE. 2000. A chromosomally encoded type III secretion pathway in Yersinia enterocolitica is important in virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 36: 1436-1446.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  49. Turkovicova L, Smidak R, Jung G, Turna J, Lubec G, Aradska J. 2016. Proteomic analysis of the TerC interactome: novel links to tellurite resistance and pathogenicity. J. Proteomics 136: 167-173.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. Samuel G, Reeves P. 2003. Biosynthesis of O-antigens: genes and pathways involved in nucleotide sugar precursor synthesis and Oantigen assembly. Carbohydr. Res. 338: 2503-2519.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. Feng L, Senchenkova SN, Yang J, Shashkov AS, Tao J, Guo H, et al. 2004. Synthesis of the heteropolysaccharide O antigen of Escherichia coli O52 requires an ABC transporter: structural and genetic evidence. J. Bacteriol. 186: 4510-4519.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  52. Vinogradov E, Frirdich E, MacLean LL, Perry MB, Petersen BO, Duus JO, et al. 2002. Structures of lipopolysaccharides from Klebsiella pneumoniae. Eluicidation of the structure of the linkage region between core and polysaccharide O chain and identification of the residues at the non-reducing termini of the O chains. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 25070-25081.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  53. Whitfield C, Trent MS. 2014. Biosynthesis and export of bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 83: 99-128.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  54. King JD, Berry S, Clarke BR, Morris RJ, Whitfield C. 2014. Lipopolysaccharide O antigen size distribution is determined by a chain extension complex of variable stoichiometry in Escherichia coli O9a. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111: 6407-6412.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  55. Kenyon JJ, Cunneen MM, Reeves PR. 2017. Genetics and evolution of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis O-specific polysaccharides: a novel pattern of O-antigen diversity. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 41: 200-217.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  56. Chen Y, Bystricky P, Adeyeye J, Panigrahi P, Ali A, Johnson JA, et al. 2007. The capsule polysaccharide structure and biogenesis for non-O1 Vibrio cholerae NRT36S: genes are embedded in the LPS region. BMC Microbiol. 7: 20.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  57. Guo X, Liu B, Chen M, Wang Y, Wang L, Chen H, Wang Y, et al. 2017. Genetic and serological identification of three Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains as candidates for novel provisional O serotypes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 245: 53-58.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  58. Gierczyński R. 2000. Evaluation of the usefulness of selected virulence markers for identification of virulent strains of Yersinia enterocolitica strains. III. Chromosome markers of virulence. Med. Dosw Mikrobiol. 52: 51-65.
  59. Bhagat N, Virdi JS. 2007. Distribution of virulence-associated genes in Yersinia enterocolitica biovar 1A correlates with clonal groups and not the source of isolation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 266: 177-183.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  60. Hein J, Kempf VA, Diebold J, Bücheler N, Preger S, Horak I, et al. 2000. Interferon consensus sequence binding protein confers resistance against Yersinia enterocolitica. Infect. Immun. 68: 1408-1417.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  61. Brem D, Pelludat C, Rakin A, Jacobi CA, Heesemann J. 2001. Functional analysis of yersiniabactin transport genes of Yersinia enterocolitica. Microbiology (Reading) 147: 1115-1127.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  62. Haller JC, Carlson S, Pederson KJ, Pierson DE. 2000. A chromosomally encoded type III secretion pathway in Yersinia enterocolitica is important in virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 36: 1436-1446.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  63. Venecia K, Young GM. 2005. Environmental regulation and virulence attributes of the Ysa type III secretion system of Yersinia enterocolitica biovar 1B. Infect. Immun. 73: 5961-5977.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  64. Jiang L, Yang W, Jiang X, Yao T, Wang L, Yang B. 2021. Virulence-related O islands in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Gut Microbes 13: 1992237.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  65. Liu B, Qian C, Wu P, Li X, Liu Y, Mu H, et al. 2021. Attachment of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli to host cells reduces O antigen chain length at the infection site that promotes infection. mBio 12: e0269221.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  66. Qian C, Huang M, Du Y, Song J, Mu H, Wei Y, et al. 2021. Chemotaxis and shorter O-antigen chain length contribute to the strong desiccation tolerance of a food-isolated Cronobacter sakazakii strain. Front. Microbiol. 12: 779538.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef