전체메뉴
검색
Article Search

JMB Journal of Microbiolog and Biotechnology

QR Code QR Code

Research article


References

  1. Filkins LM, O'Toole GA. 2015. Cystic fibrosis lung infections: polymicrobial, complex, and hard to treat. PLoS Pathog. 11: e1005258.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  2. Khanolkar RA, Clark ST, Wang PW, Hwang DM, Yau YC, Waters VJ, et al. 2020. Ecological succession of polymicrobial communities in the cystic fibrosis airways. mSystems 5: 10-1128.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  3. Camus L, Briaud P, Vandenesch F, Moreau K. 2021. How bacterial adaptation to cystic fibrosis environment shapes interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Microbiol. 12: 617784.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  4. De Oliveira DM, Forde BM, Kidd TJ, Harris PN, Schembri MA, Beatson SA, et al. 2020. Antimicrobial resistance in ESKAPE pathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 33: 10-1128.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  5. Filkins LM, Graber JA, Olson DG, Dolben EL, Lynd LR, Bhuju S, et al. 2015. Coculture of Staphylococcus aureus with Pseudomonas aeruginosa drives S. aureus towards fermentative metabolism and reduced viability in a cystic fibrosis model. J. Bacteriol. 197: 2252-2264.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  6. Ibberson CB, Stacy A, Fleming D, Dees JL, Rumbaugh K, Gilmore MS, et al. 2017. Co-infecting microorganisms dramatically alter pathogen gene essentiality during polymicrobial infection. Nat. Microbiol. 2: 1-6.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  7. Mashburn LM, Jett AM, Akins DR, Whiteley M. 2005. Staphylococcus aureus serves as an iron source for Pseudomonas aeruginosa during in vivo coculture. J. Bacteriol. 187: 554-566.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  8. Barnabie PM, Whiteley M. 2015. Iron-mediated control of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Staphylococcus aureus interactions in the cystic fibrosis lung. J. Bacteriol. 197: 2250-2251.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  9. McNamara PJ, Proctor RA. 2000. Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants, electron transport and persistent infections. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 14: 117-122.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Hoffman LR, Déziel E, D'Argenio DA, Lépine F, Emerson J, McNamara S, et al. 2006. Selection for Staphylococcus aureus smallcolony variants due to growth in the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 19890-19895.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  11. D'Argenio DA, Calfee MW, Rainey PB, Pesci EC. 2002. Autolysis and autoaggregation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa colony morphology mutants. J. Bacteriol. 184: 6481-6489.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  12. D'Argenio DA, Wu M, Hoffman LR, Kulasekara HD, Déziel E, Smith EE, et al. 2007. Growth phenotypes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lasR mutants adapted to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Mol. Microbiol. 64: 512-533.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  13. Déziel E, Lépine F, Milot S, He J, Mindrinos MN, Tompkins RG, et al. 2004. Analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4-hydroxy-2-alkylquinolines (HAQs) reveals a role for 4-hydroxy-2-heptylquinoline in cell-to-cell communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 1339-1344.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  14. Hazan R, Que YA, Maura D, Strobel B, Majcherczyk PA, Hopper LR, et al. 2016. Auto poisoning of the respiratory chain by a quorumsensing-regulated molecule favors biofilm formation and antibiotic tolerance. Curr. Biol. 26: 195-206.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  15. Michelsen CF, Christensen AMJ, Bojer MS, Høiby N, Ingmer H, Jelsbak L. 2014. Staphylococcus aureus alters growth activity, autolysis, and antibiotic tolerance in a human host-adapted Pseudomonas aeruginosa lineage. J. Bacteriol. 196: 3903-3911.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  16. Kim BO, Jang HJ, Chung IY, Bae HW, Kim ES, Cho YH. 2021a. Nitrate respiration promotes polymyxin B resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 34: 442-451.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Jang HJ, Chung IY, Lim C, Chung S, Kim BO, Kim ES, et al. 2019. Redirecting an anticancer to an antibacterial hit against methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Microbiol. 10: 350.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  18. Park SY, Heo YJ, Choi YS, Déziel E, Cho YH. 2005. Conserved virulence factors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa are required for killing Bacillus subtilis. J. Microbiol. 43: 443-450.
  19. Hoang C, Ferré-D'Amaré AR. 2001. Cocrystal structure of a tRNA Ψ55 pseudouridine synthase: nucleotide flipping by an RNAmodifying enzyme. Cell 107: 929-939.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Ahn KS, Ha U, Jia J, Wu D, Jin S. 2004. The truA gene of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is required for the expression of type III secretory genes. Microbiology 150: 539-547.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Kredich NM. 2008. Biosynthesis of cysteine. EcoSal Plus 3: 10-1128.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Stroupe ME, Leech HK, Daniels DS, Warren MJ, Getzoff ED. 2003. CysG structure reveals tetrapyrrole-binding features and novel regulation of siroheme biosynthesis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 10: 1064-1073.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Storbeck S, Walther J, Müller J, Parmar V, Schiebel HM, Kemken D, et al. 2009. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa nirE gene encodes the S‐adenosyl‐L‐methionine‐dependent uroporphyrinogen III methyltransferase required for heme d1 biosynthesis. FEBS J. 276: 5973-5982.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Murphy MJ, Siegel LM, Tove SR, Kamin H. 1974. Siroheme: a new prosthetic group participating in six-electron reduction reactions catalyzed by both sulfite and nitrite reductases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71: 612-616.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  25. Novick RP, Jiang D. 2003. The staphylococcal saeRS system coordinates environmental signals with agr quorum sensing. Microbiology 149: 2709-2717.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Burton B, Dubnau D. 2010. Membrane-associated DNA transport machines. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2: a000406.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  27. Stacy A, McNally L, Darch SE, Brown SP, Whiteley M. 2016. The biogeography of polymicrobial infection. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14: 93-105.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  28. Darveau RP. 2010. Periodontitis: a polymicrobial disruption of host homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8: 481-490.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Korgaonkar A, Trivedi U, Rumbaugh KP, Whiteley M. 2013. Community surveillance enhances Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence during polymicrobial infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110: 1059-1064.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  30. Lee YJ, Jang HJ, Chung IY, Cho YH. 2018. Drosophila melanogaster as a polymicrobial infection model for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Microbiol. 56: 534-541.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Jenul C, Keim KC, Jens JN, Zeiler MJ, Schilcher K, Schurr MJ, et al. 2023. Pyochelin biotransformation by Staphylococcus aureus shapes bacterial competition with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in polymicrobial infections. Cell Rep. 42: 112540.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  32. Orazi G, O'Toole GA. 2017. Pseudomonas aeruginosa alters Staphylococcus aureus sensitivity to vancomycin in a biofilm model of cystic fibrosis infection. mBio 8: e00873-17.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  33. Lee YJ. 2019. Roles of the quorum-sensing circuits in interaction between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Master thesis. CHA university.
  34. Goodman AL, Kulasekara B, Rietsch A, Boyd D, Smith RS, Lory S. 2004. A signaling network reciprocally regulates genes associated with acute infection and chronic persistence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Dev. Cell 7: 745-754.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Bae T, Banger AK, Wallace A, Glass EM, Åslund F, Schneewind O, et al. 2004. Staphylococcus aureus virulence genes identified by bursa aurealis mutagenesis and nematode killing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 12312-12317.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  36. Kim ES, Lee JY, Park C, Ahn SJ, Bae HW, Cho YH. 2021b. cDNA-derived RNA phage assembly reveals critical residues in the maturation protein of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa leviphage PP7. J. Virol. 95: 10-1128.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  37. Kim K, Kim YU, Koh BH, Hwang SS, Kim SH, Lépine F, et al. 2010. HHQ and PQS, two Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum‐sensing molecules, down‐regulate the innate immune responses through the nuclear factor‐κB pathway. Immunology 129: 578-588.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef

Related articles in JMB

More Related Articles

Article

Research article

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024; 34(4): 795-803

Published online April 28, 2024 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2312.12028

Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Autolysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Quorum-Sensing Mutant Is Suppressed by Staphylococcus aureus through Iron-Dependent Metabolism

Shin-Yae Choi, In-Young Chung, Hee-Won Bae, and You-Hee Cho*

Program of Biopharmaceutical Science and Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy and Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, CHA University, Gyeonggi-do 13488, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to:You-Hee Cho,       youhee@cha.ac.kr

Received: December 19, 2023; Revised: January 23, 2024; Accepted: January 30, 2024

Abstract

Microorganisms usually coexist as a multifaceted polymicrobial community in the natural habitats and at mucosal sites of the human body. Two opportunistic human pathogens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus commonly coexist in the bacterial infections for hospitalized and/or immunocompromised patients. Here, we observed that autolysis of the P. aeruginosa quorum-sensing (QS) mutant (lasRmvfR) was suppressed by the presence of the S. aureus cells in vitro. The QS mutant still displayed killing against S. aureus cells, suggesting the link between the S. aureus-killing activity and the autolysis suppression. Independent screens of the P. aeruginosa transposon mutants defective in the S. aureus-killing and the S. aureus transposon mutants devoid of the autolysis suppression revealed the genetic link between both phenotypes, suggesting that the iron-dependent metabolism involving S. aureus exoproteins might be central to both phenotypes. The autolysis was suppressed by iron treatment as well. These results suggest that the interaction between P. aeruginosa and S. aureus might be governed by mechanisms that necessitate the QS circuitry as well as the metabolism involving the extracellular iron resources during the polymicrobial infections in the human airway.

Keywords: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, quorum-sensing, iron, secretome

Introduction

Microorganisms usually coexist with a wide variety of polymicrobial communities, not only on abiotic surfaces in their natural habitat, but also on mucosal sites in the human body. These polymicrobial populations from resident microbiota and/or invading microbes can be regarded as important determinants of the human health and physiology, whose imbalances may lead to the pathological states of the human bodies. In recent years, increased attention has been paid to the complex interactions that occur in the polymicrobial populations, especially during bacterial infections. One of the best studied polymicrobial infections caused by complex communities of bacterial pathogens is the respiratory infections in the patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), where four major bacterial species (i.e., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, and Burkholderia cepacia complex) have been focused on [1, 2], with the two most prevalent species being P. aeruginosa and S. aureus [3]. They are highly notorious ESKAPE pathogens and the well-studied model bacteria in various microbiological aspects [4]. P. aeruginosa is a Gram-negative bacterium that is commonly found in soil and water as well as in plants, animals, and humans. P. aeruginosa has become an emerging opportunistic pathogen with multiple antibiotic resistance and tolerance in the clinics. S. aureus is a Gram-positive bacterium that is identified from warm-blooded animals, being a common cause of food poisoning and skin infections such as abscesses. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is a worldwide concern in clinical medicine.

It is recently known that both P. aeruginosa and S. aureus affect each other in mixed cultures in vitro [5, 6]. P. aeruginosa produces 2-heptyl-4-hydroxyquinoline-N-oxide (HQNO) that kills S. aureus cells most likely to survive physiological conditions depleted in irons [7, 8]. HQNO-mediated S. aureus-killing is attributed to the apparent disturbance of electron transport in S. aureus. Given that functional electron transport chains are required not only to support the rapid growth of S. aureus, but also to render S. aureus cells susceptible to the bactericidal antibiotics [9], HQNO could select S. aureus small colony variants with altered respiratory activity in the presence of antibiotics during the interaction with P. aeruginosa [10]. They suggest the complex interactions between these two bacterial species during human infections and antibiotic treatment.

In this study, we first observed that the P. aeruginosa quorum-sensing (QS) mutant (lasRmvfR) devoid of HQNO production still displayed some residual killing activity against S. aureus mutants with altered respiratory activity. The QS mutant suffers from earlier autolysis than the wild type, which was suppressed by the presence of S. aureus cells as well as their culture supernatants. We have also uncovered the genetic link between the S. aureus-killing activity of P. aeruginosa and the autolysis suppression by S. aureus, based on the identification of the genes from both bacterial species, which might contribute to iron-dependent metabolism in P. aeruginosa and exoprotein secretion in S. aureus.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are described in Table 1. Luria-Bertani (LB) (1% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract and 1% NaCl) broth, LB broth supplemented with 50 mM KNO3 (LBN), Tryptic soy broth (Difco, USA), 2% Bacto-agar (Difco) LB plates, and cetrimide agar (CA) (Difco) plates were used. Overnight-grown cultures were used as inoculum (1% sub-culture) into fresh broth and grown at 37°C in a shaking incubator until the logarithmic growth phase (i.e., OD600 of 1.0), and then the cell cultures were used for the experiments described herein.

Table 1 . Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study..

Strain or plasmidRelevant characteristics or purposeaReference or source
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
PA14Wild type laboratory strain; RifRLaboratory collection
PA14 lasRPA14 with in-frame deletion of lasR; RifR[18]
PA14 mvfRPA14 with in-frame deletion of mvfR; RifRThis study
PA14 pqsAPA14 with in-frame deletion of pqsA; RifR[37]
PA14 lasRpqsAPA14 with in-frame deletion of lasRpqsA; RifRThis study
PA14 lasRmvfRPA14 with in-frame deletion of lasRmvfR; RifRThis study
PA14 lasRmvfRcysBPA14 with in-frame deletion of lasRmvfRcysB; RifRThis study
PA14 lasRmvfRcysGPA14 with in-frame deletion of lasRmvfRcysG; RifRThis study
PA14 lasRmvfRtruBPA14 with in-frame deletion of lasRmvfRtruB; RifRThis study
Staphylococcus aureus
NewmanWild type laboratory strain (MSSA); methicillin-sensitiveLaboratory collection
SA3Wild type laboratory strain (MRSA); McRLaboratory collection
m5Respiratory mutant of SA3; McR[17]
m5 saeSm5 with Tn917 insertion in saeS; McR EmRThis study
m5 comECm5 with Tn917 insertion in comEC; McR EmRThis study
Escherichia coli
DH5αMultipurpose cloningLaboratory collection
S17-1(λpir)Conjugal transfer of mobilizable plasmidsLaboratory collection
S17-1(λpir)(pBTK30)S17-1(λpir) harboring pBTK30 for mariner transposon insertion; GmR CbRLaboratory collection
Plasmids
pEX18TAllelic exchange by homologous recombinationLaboratory collection
pTV1Insertional mutagenesis by the transposon Tn917; CmR EmR[35]
pEX18T-cysBpEX18T with in-frame deletion in the cysB gene; CbRThis study
pEX18T-cysGpEX18T with in-frame deletion in the cysG gene; CbRThis study
pEX18T-truBpEX18T with in-frame deletion in the truB gene; CbRThis study

aRifR, rifampicin-resistant; McR, methicillin-resistant; GmR, gentamicin-resistant; CbR, carbenicillin- and ampicillin-resistant; CmR, chloramphenicol-resistant; EmR, erythromycin-resistant.



Construction of Deletion Mutants

All the deletion constructs were created using pEX18T as described elsewhere [16]. Oligonucleotide primers were designed using the PA14 genome sequence. SOEing (splicing by overlap extension) PCR was conducted by using four oligonucleotide primers for in-frame deletions as listed in Table 2. The resulting constructs were introduced into the wild type PA14 or the relevant mutants like the QS (lasRmvfR) mutant and the double-crossover recombinants were obtained by sucrose selection from the cointegrates, all of which were verified by PCR at each stage.

Table 2 . Primers and probes used in this study..

Primer or probeRelevant characteristics or purposeOligonucleotide sequence (5'–3')a
mvfR-OFSOEing PCR for mvfR in-frame deletionGAATTCACGAGCAATATGA
mvfR-IRSOEing PCR for mvfR in-frame deletionCGCGCAGGCGCTGGGCGATGACCTGGAGGAA
mvfR-IFSOEing PCR for mvfR in-frame deletionCCAGGTCATCGCCCAGCGCCTGCGCGAACTGG
mvfR-ORSOEing PCR for mvfR in-frame deletionCTGCAGCATGGCAAGAGC
cysB-OFSOEing PCR for cysB in-frame deletionGAATTCGCAGGCTGGATGGTC
cysB-IRSOEing PCR for cysB in-frame deletionGGAGGACGAACTGGGCGGCTTCATGTGCGACT
cysB-IFSOEing PCR for cysB in-frame deletionAGTCGCACATGAAGCCGCCCAGTTCGTCCTCC
cysB-ORSOEing PCR for cysB in-frame deletionGGATCCTCGCCGGCAGCCATA
cysG-OFSOEing PCR for cysG in-frame deletionGGTACCCAGCCAGGACAAGTAC
cysG-IRSOEing PCR for cysG in-frame deletionGCTCAGCCACCAGTTGCGCGCCGGCGTCGGCC
cysG-IFSOEing PCR for cysG in-frame deletionGGCCGACGCCGGCGCGCAACTGGTGGCTGAGC
cysG-ORSOEing PCR for cysG in-frame deletionGGATCCTGCGGCGCATCGAAGAC
truB-OFSOEing PCR for truB in-frame deletionGGATCCTGTTGATGTTGGCGG
truB-IRSOEing PCR for truB in-frame deletionGAGCGTGGCCCAGGTGTGATGCCGGAAGACAG
truB-IFSOEing PCR for truB in-frame deletionCTGTCTTCCGGCATCACACCTGGGCCACGCTC
truB-ORSOEing PCR for truB in-frame deletionAAGCTTACAGCCGTACCCAGC
PA-ArbM1Arbitrary PCR for transposon insertion site mappingCTTACCAGGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTACNNNNNNNNNNGATAT
PA-ArbM2Arbitrary PCR for transposon insertion site mappingCTTACCAGGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTAC
Arb1-BTKArbitrary PCR for transposon insertion site mappingCACCGCTGCGTTCGGTCAAG
Arb2-BTKArbitrary PCR for transposon insertion site mappingCGAACCGAACAGGCCTTATGTTCAATTC
Seq-BTKSequencing of arbitrary PCR ampliconsGGATGAAGTGGTTCGCATCCTC
SA-ArbA1Arbitrary PCR for transposon insertion site mappingGGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTCANNNNNNNNGATCA
SA-ArbA2Arbitrary PCR for transposon insertion site mappingGGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTCA
Arb1-Tn917Arbitrary PCR for transposon insertion site mappingCACCTGCAATAACCGTTACCTG
Arb2-Tn917Arbitrary PCR for transposon insertion site mappingTCACAATAGAGAGATGTCACCG
Seq-Tn917Sequencing of arbitrary PCR ampliconsCCAATCACTCTCGGACAATAC

aUnderlining denotes the engineered restriction enzyme sites.



Autolysis Assay

P. aeruginosa autolysis was examined in 24-h or 48-h LBN cultures. Briefly, freshly grown (OD600 of 1.0) cells (~106 CFU) of P. aeruginosa or S. aureus were inoculated into the 48-well plate wells containing 400 μl LBN broth. The plates are incubated on a rotatory shaker at 37°C for either 24 or 48 h. Autolysis is monitored by visual inspection of aggregated cell debris, which was verified by Live/Dead-Baclight staining (Invitrogen, USA) [33].

S. aureus Killing Assay

S. aureus killing was assessed either by plate killing or by growth competition in 16-h liquid culture. Plate killing assay was previously described [18]. Briefly, LBN plates were overlaid with 0.7% top agar containing 100 μl of S. aureus cultures that had been grown to OD600 of 1.0 and then dried for 1 h under sterile air blowing. P. aeruginosa bacterial suspensions (3 μl) containing 106 CFU of early stationary growth phase (OD600 of 3.0) were spotted onto the S. aureus lawns. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 16 h. The killing activity is scored as the visible halo around the cell spots.

Growth competition was monitored by separate viable counts of each strain after 16-h coculture of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. Freshly grown (OD600 of 1.0) cells (106 CFU) of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus were inoculated into the culture tubes containing 3 ml LBN broth. After 16-h incubation, culture suspensions were 10-fold serially diluted, and the diluted samples (3 μl) were spotted onto the LB agar plates containing either 5% NaCl (for S. aureus selection) and 50 μg/ml rifampicin (for P. aeruginosa selection).

Transposon Experiments

Two plasmids (pBTK30 with Himar1 for P. aeruginosa and pTV1 with Tn917 for S. aureus) were used for transposon mutagenesis [34, 35]. pBTK30 was introduced into the P. aeruginosa QS mutant by conjugation for 5 h at 37°C. CA plates containing gentamicin (50 μg/ml) were used for Himar1 transposant selection. A total of 1,734 transposon insertion clones were screened for the mutants devoid of the residual S. aureus-killing activity of the QS mutant. Three mutants were chosen out of the 67 primary candidates. pTV1 was introduced into S. aureus m5 by transformation. Temperature induction and selection was performed by growing the cells overnight in LB broth supplemented with 10 μg/ml erythromycin at 42°C. A total of 1,765 chloramphenicol-sensitive and erythromycin-resistant Tn917 transposant clones were screened for the mutants incapable of the autolysis suppression, resulting in 2 transposon clones as the final candidates. The transposon insertion sites were determined by arbitrary PCR followed by sequencing using the appropriate primers listed in Table 2.

Protein Experiments

Exoprotein profiles were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. S. aureus cells were grown, and the culture supernatants were precipitated by 10% (v/v) trichloroacetic acid and separated on a 12% (vol/vol) polyacrylamide gel at 100 V for 110 min. The gels were stained with Coomassie Brilliant blue R 250 for 30 min as described elsewhere [36]. Ammonium sulfate (AS) precipitation was used for partial fractionation of the exoproteins, by altering the AS concentrations. The culture supernatant from 500 ml of the S. aureus m5 culture was subjected to filtration (0.22-μm membrane filter) and the filtrate was mixed with cOmpleteTM ULTRA Tablets EASYpack (Roche, Switzerland) and then kept at 4°C for 16 h. The sample was transferred to a beaker and AS powder was gradually added while agitating the sample to reach a final concentration of 50%. The sample was subjected to centrifugation at 12 K for 30 min to separate the pellet and the supernatant. The pellet was dissolved in PBS buffer (2.7 mM KCl, 137 mM NaCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, and 2 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.0) as the 50% AS sample. The supernatant was further subjected to the AS addition to reach 65% and the 65% AS sample was obtained after dissolution of the 65% AS pellet. Likewise, the 80% and the 90% AS samples were obtained.

Results and Discussion

P. aeruginosa Autolysis Is Suppressed by S. aureus

Autolysis phenotype of P. aeruginosa has long been known, which are associated with the overproduction of the PQS-related signaling molecules [11]. This phenotype is frequently observed in the clinical isolates from the CF patients, which is attributed to the mutations in the lasR gene encoding the master QS regulator in P. aeruginosa. Fig. 1 represents the involvement of the QS regulators, LasR and MvfR (PqsR), in regulation of the biosynthetic pathway for the PQS-related signaling molecules: the pqsABCD and pqsE genes are positively regulated by MvfR, whereas the pqsH gene is under the LasR control. Autolysis is often observed in the prolonged incubation of the lasR mutant of the laboratory strains [12], which undergoes accumulation of the PQS precursor, 2-heptyl-4-hydroxyquinoline (HHQ) and/or HQNO [13]. It is known that the wild-type P. aeruginosa laboratory strains (PA14 and PAO1) exhibits autolysis after 48-h growth in the planktonic cultures, which is triggered by HQNO-mediated self-poisoning of the electron transport chains [14]. HQNO also poisons S. aureus at the level that could not poison P. aeruginosa. It can select for the small colony variants (SCVs) of S. aureus in condition that the growth of both P. aeruginosa and S. aureus could be affected by antibiotics in the mixed culture [10, 15].

Figure 1. Schematic overview of the PQS biosynthesis. The biosynthetic enzymes for the PQS-related signaling molecules are encoded by the pqs genes as indicated, and their expression is positively regulated by the QS-regulators LasR and MvfR as highlighted in red and blue, respectively. Abbreviations for the molecules: AA, anthranilic acid; 2-ABA, 2'-aminobenzoylacetic acid; 2-HABA, 2'-hydroxylaminobenzoylacetatic acid; HHQ, 4-hydroxy-2-heptylquinoline; HQNO, 2-heptyl-4-hydroxyquinoline- N-oxide; PQS, Pseudomonas quinolone signal.

To better understand the autolysis phenotype of P. aeruginosa regarding QS-dependent and/or conditional HQNO poisoning of both species, we used the QS mutants of P. aeruginosa PA14 during the coculture with S. aureus strains under aerobic nitrate-respiration condition, which might promote alternative respiration mode [16]. Fig. 2 shows that the wild type (WT) underwent visible autolysis with pigment overproduction by 48-h incubation, but not by 24-h incubation, whereas the QS mutants such as lasR, mvfR, and lasRmvfR displayed autolysis phenotypes by 24-h incubation. This result suggests that the P. aeruginosa QS involving LasR and MvfR is required to delay the autolysis, although they are required to generate the known auto-poisoning molecule, HQNO. This observation of the time-dependent relationship between autolysis and HQNO would be attributed to the differential susceptibility of the QS mutants to HQNO and/or to the other unknown mechanisms by which the earlier autolysis should occur in the QS mutants.

Figure 2. Autolysis suppression of the QS mutants. Autolysis of P. aeruginosa PA14 (WT) and its QS mutants (lasR, mvfR, and lasRmvfR) was monitored from the 48-well LBN cultures in the presence or absence (-) of S. aureus strains (Newman, SA3, and m5), which were grown at 37°C for either 24 h or 48 h. Cell debris by autolysis is indicated by arrowheads.

Michelsen et al. [15] reported the commensal-like interaction between P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, in which S. aureus was not killed by a certain P. aeruginosa isolate and its autolysis was suppressed by S. aureus. This study prompted us to evaluate the QS mutants for the S. aureus-mediated autolysis suppression, in that the HQNO-directed S. aureus-killing activity should be clearly reduced in the QS mutants. The WT S. aureus, Newman, an MRSA strain, SA3, and its respiratory mutant (m5) were used for the coculture with P. aeruginosa. The growth of m5 is comparable to that of SA3, and the whole genome sequencing revealed that m5 contains the ubiE mutation for the ubiquinone metabolism and two other mutations (atl_2 and lytN_1) [17]. We revealed that all the S. aureus strains were able to suppress the autolysis of the QS mutants and the 48-h culture autolysis of the WT. This and the fact that the WT P. aeruginosa can kill S. aureus, not in such commensal-like interactions, led us to hypothesize that the QS mutants could still kill S. aureus, which might be associated with the autolysis suppression of S. aureus.

P. aeruginosa Autolysis Suppression Is associated with the Residual S. aureus-Killing Activity

P. aeruginosa mvfR and pqsA mutants are impaired in killing Gram-positive bacteria [18]. It is noted that some residual killing activity happened to be observed on the respiratory mutant, m5 (Fig. 3). The killing activity was simply assessed by spotting P. aeruginosa cells on the lawns of Gram-positive bacteria. m5 is one of the five mutants that are resistant to naphthoquinone-generated reactive oxygen species (ROS) and have a ubiE mutation in common [17]. Those five mutants showed reduced respiratory activity and subsequently reduced ROS generation [17], where ROS would be the key to HQNO-poisoning of S. aureus. Fig. 3A shows that the S. aureus-killing activity was observed by the WT P. aeruginosa and, to the lesser extent, by the lasR mutant. However, the mutations in mvfR and pqsA completely abolished the visible killing activity on SA3. This is consistent with the previous observation that HQNO is crucial to the S. aureus-killing activity [10]. However, we highlighted some residual killing activity on the m5 mutant for the killing assay (Fig. 3B). The killing by the WT as well as that by the lasR mutant were also enhanced on m5, suggesting HQNO is the major, but not the sole killing activity against S. aureus. The residual killing activity was scarcely detected previously, but evident when P. aeruginosa interacts with the m5 mutant of S. aureus. The residual killing activity must have been unseen in the S. aureus with normal respiration. Although it needs to be further verified that the altered respiration as observed in m5 could occur during the natural interaction between P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, we hypothesized that the P. aeruginosa autolysis suppression by S. aureus might be associated with the residual S. aureus-killing activity by P. aeruginosa.

Figure 3. S. aureus killing of the QS mutants. S. aureus killing of P. aeruginosa PA14 (WT) and its mutants (pqsA, lasRpqsA, and lasRmvfR) was monitored on the cell lawns of S. aureus SA3 (A) and m5 (B). The residual killing activity is indicated by arrowheads.

P. aeruginosa Autolysis Suppression and S. aureus-Killing Activity Are Genetically Linked

To validate the association between the autolysis suppression and the residual S. aureus-killing activity, we attempted to isolate the mutants from both P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, which are defective in the residual S. aureus-killing activity and the autolysis suppression, respectively. Random transposon mutagenesis as described in Materials and Methods enabled us to identify three mutants of P. aeruginosa lasRmvfR (cysB, cysG, and truB) and two mutants of S. aureus m5 (saeS and comEC) (Fig. 4). It is important at this stage that we just wanted to gain an insight into the relationship between the autolysis suppression and the residual S. aureus-killing activity. Therefore, we did not delve into characterization of the individual genes, but just wanted to validate the genetic link therebetween.

Figure 4. S. aureus killing of the isolated mutants. (A) Positions of P. aeruginosa PA14 (WT) and its mutant (lasR, lasRmvfR, lasRmvfRcysB, lasRmvfRcysG, and lasRmvfRtruB) cells spots in B that had been applied to S. aureus killing plate assay as in Fig. 3. (B) S. aureus killing of P. aeruginosa cells as in A was monitored on the cell lawns of S. aureus m5 and its mutants (saeS and comEC). The disappearance of the residual killing activity of lasRmvfR is indicated by dotted arrowheads.

The involvement of the truB gene that encodes a subunit of pseudouridine synthase in tRNA modification [19] might be surprising. It should be noted, however, that the truA gene encoding another subunit of pseudouridine synthase is required for the optimal expression of type III secretory genes presumably by affecting the tRNA-mediated translation efficiency [20], suggesting that some TruB-dependent tRNA functions might be required for the optimal expression of the genes involved in the residual killing activity in P. aeruginosa.

The cysB gene encodes the master regulator (CysB) in sulfur uptake and cysteine biosynthesis [21], whereas the cysG encodes a methyltransferase for siroheme biosynthesis [22], despite its sequence and functional similarity to methyltransferases, NirE and CobA, in heme d1 and cobalamin synthesis, respectively [23]. Although we have not performed complementation experiments and do not fully understand whether these genes are indeed involved in the residual S. aureus-killing activity, the involvement of CysG was noteworthy in that it is associated with nitrate respiration and sulfur metabolism, in that siroheme is the prosthetic group for both nitrite reductase and sulfite reductase [24]. The impact of siroheme in addition to the previous finding that P. aeruginosa uses S. aureus as the iron source upon S. aureus killing [5] suggest the importance of iron-dependent metabolism of P. aeruginosa in the residual S. aureus-killing activity.

Identification of the S. aureus m5 mutants (saeS and comEC) also revealed the importance of virulence exoproteins (for saeS) and membrane functions (for comEC) in support for the S. aureus-killing. SaeS is a histidine kinase of the two-component regulatory system (SaeRS) that is required for expression and secretion of various extracellular virulence factors [25], whereas comEC encodes a large integral membrane protein forming a large channel for passage of DNA and/or peptides for competence [26]. Although we did not experimentally verify either whether these are indeed required for the residual S. aureus-killing activity, it is evident that the isolated mutant clones were devoid of the residual S. aureus-killing activity (Fig. 4).

To verify the S. aureus killing quantitatively, we designed the mixed culture of these two species in liquid broth. After 16-h culture, the remaining bacteria were enumerated by separate viable counts on the selective media as described in Materials and Methods. Fig. 5A shows the viable counts of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa after the coculture: in all cultures, the growth of P. aeruginosa was not affected at all by the presence of S. aureus. As expected, however, the killing activity against m5 was highest in the WT and no killing activity was observed in the lasRmvfRcysG mutant. In contrast, only the residual killing activity of the lasRmvfR mutant disappeared in either P. aeruginosa mutation (cysG) or S. aureus mutations (saeS and comEC), suggesting that both CysG and SaeS (or ComEC) are simultaneously required for the m5-killing activity of the lasRmvfR mutant.

Figure 5. S. aureus-killing and autolysis suppression of the isolated mutants. (A) S. aureus killing of P. aeruginosa PA14 (WT) and its mutants (lasR, lasRmvfR, and lasRmvfRcysG) cells was monitored after growth competition between one of them and S. aureus (m5, saeS, and comEC) in 24-h liquid culture. Culture suspensions were diluted and spotted on LB plates amended with either 5% NaCl (to select S. aureus) or 50 μg/ml rifampicin (to select P. aeruginosa). The numbers indicate the dilution folds of the culture suspension. (B) Autolysis of P. aeruginosa PA14 (WT) and its mutants (lasRmvfR, lasRmvfRcysB, lasRmvfRcysG, and lasRmvfRtruB) was monitored from the 48-well LBN cultures in the presence or absence (-) of S. aureus strains (SA3, m5, saeS and comEC), which were grown at 37°C for 24 h.

To verify the genetic link between the autolysis suppression and the residual S. aureus-killing activity, these mutants were tested for their ability to suppress the autolysis (Fig. 5B). It is noted that saeS and comEC bacteria could not suppress the autolysis of the m5-killing QS mutant and that the m5 bacteria could not suppress the autolysis of the unkilling QS mutants (especially with cysG). These results substantiate the genetic link between the autolysis suppression and the residual S. aureus-killing activity.

P. aeruginosa Autolysis Is Suppressed by S. aureus Exoproteins or Iron Treatment

Based on the genetic link between autolysis suppression and the residual S. aureus-killing activity featuring the identified genes especially the P. aeruginosa cysG and the S. aureus saeS, we postulated that the iron metabolism of P. aeruginosa and the secreted exoproteins of S. aureus could be involved in those phenotypes. It is evident that the extracellular protein profiles differed between the m5 and the mutant bacteria (Fig. 6A), in that some bands in the m5 sample were missing in those of the mutants, suggesting that some extracellular proteins could suppress the autolysis of the QS mutant and the subsequent S. aureus killing. To confirm this, we obtained the culture supernatant from m5 and prepared its ammonium sulfate (AS) fractions, which were tested for their ability to suppress the autolysis. As shown in Fig. 6B, the most prominent autolysis suppression was observed in the 80% AS fraction, suggesting that the suppressing activity was enriched in this fraction. The red color of the fraction led us to hypothesize that some iron-containing protein(s) could be the key to the autolysis suppression. Under consideration of the aforementioned mutant screens from P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in addition to the assumption that the exoprotein(s) would be important in the autolysis suppression, we examined if the treatment with only iron could suppress the autolysis phenotype (Fig. 6C). As a result, both iron (II) and iron (III) could suppress the autolysis of the QS mutants, whereas copper (II), calcium, and magnesium could not. It should be noted that copper (I) could partially suppress the autolysis of the mvfR and the lasRmvfR mutants, which could be further verified in comparison with other monovalent cations.

Figure 6. Autolysis suppression of the extracellular proteins and metals. (A) Profiles of extracellular proteins from S. aureus m5 and its mutants (saeS and comEC) were analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE. The size markers (M) are included with the molecular weight (kDa) of representative bands. (B and C) Autolysis of P. aeruginosa PA14 was monitored from the 24-h 48- well LBN cultures in the presence of either ammonium sulfate ((NH4)2SO4) precipitate fractions (B) at the indicated concentrations (50%, 65%, 80%, and 95%) or metal ions (C).

Iron is an essential element for growth and survival of most microorganisms. It is involved in many cellular processes as a cofactor tightly coordinated by hemes or amino acid residues of iron-containing proteins. Mashburn et al. [7] suggested that P. aeruginosa can utilize the iron-containing proteins of S. aureus as an iron source, which could be released from the lysed S. aureus cells. However, the S. aureus-killing activity could vary in the contexts of the interactions between these two species as well as their interactions with the human host in vivo. The involvement of the secreted exoproteins of S. aureus in the residual self-killing activity through iron-dependent metabolisms in P. aeruginosa needs to be further elucidated by characterizing the chemical identity of both the residual S. aureus-killing substance(s) of P. aeruginosa and the secreted exoprotein(s) of S. aureus that is enriched in the 80% AS fraction.

Conclusion

Polymicrobial infections can have profound effects on the course, severity, and treatment of microbial infections [27]. In many cases, different microorganisms within a polymicrobial community can lead to facilitated host colonization, enhanced pathogenic potential, and differential immune response [28, 29]. One of the well-studied examples is the interaction between P. aeruginosa and S. aureus that are highly prevalent in the CF lung and chronic wound infections [3, 30]. In the present study, we demonstrated the apparent association between the residual (not the major) S. aureus-killing activity of P. aeruginosa and the P. aeruginosa autolysis-suppression by S. aureus. We first elucidated the residual S. aureus-killing activity of the P. aeruginosa QS mutant (lasRmvfR) by exploiting the respiratory mutant of S. aureus, which had been resistant to chemical-generated ROS under aerobic conditions [17].

The connection between electron transport chains and ROS susceptibility is understandable, given that ROS can be generated during the respiration processes on molecular oxygen. It is noted that HQNO, whose production and secretion are controlled by the P. aeruginosa QS system, is implicated in both the S. aureus-killing and the P. aeruginosa autolysis. The finding of the residual S. aureus-killing activity in the absence of HQNO enabled us to highlight the importance of iron metabolism during the interaction between P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, which require the iron-related (i.e., siroheme) metabolism of P. aeruginosa and presumably the iron-containing exoprotein(s) of S. aureus. It is well known that P. aeruginosa can use S. aureus as an iron source [7]. The recent identification of pyochelin biotransformation by a secreted enzyme of S. aureus [31] also substantiates the importance of iron-dependent metabolism in the P. aeruginosa-S. aureus interaction. It is still likely that the details of iron availability will vary depending on the structure of the polymicrobial community of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, which are more complicated by generation of the SCVs of both species [32]. Nevertheless, this study suggests that the interaction between P. aeruginosa and S. aureus might be governed by sophisticated mechanisms that necessitate the P. aeruginosa QS circuitry and the polymicrobial metabolism involving the extracellular iron resources during the coexistence with S. aureus in human airways.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant (NRF-2022R1A2C3003943).

Author Contributions

Y.-H.C. conceived and designed the research. S.-Y.C. and I.-Y.C. designed and performed the experiments, and collected and analyzed the experimental data. S.-Y.C., H.-W.B. and Y.-H.C. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Schematic overview of the PQS biosynthesis. The biosynthetic enzymes for the PQS-related signaling molecules are encoded by the pqs genes as indicated, and their expression is positively regulated by the QS-regulators LasR and MvfR as highlighted in red and blue, respectively. Abbreviations for the molecules: AA, anthranilic acid; 2-ABA, 2'-aminobenzoylacetic acid; 2-HABA, 2'-hydroxylaminobenzoylacetatic acid; HHQ, 4-hydroxy-2-heptylquinoline; HQNO, 2-heptyl-4-hydroxyquinoline- N-oxide; PQS, Pseudomonas quinolone signal.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 795-803https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2312.12028

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Autolysis suppression of the QS mutants. Autolysis of P. aeruginosa PA14 (WT) and its QS mutants (lasR, mvfR, and lasRmvfR) was monitored from the 48-well LBN cultures in the presence or absence (-) of S. aureus strains (Newman, SA3, and m5), which were grown at 37°C for either 24 h or 48 h. Cell debris by autolysis is indicated by arrowheads.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 795-803https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2312.12028

Fig 3.

Figure 3.S. aureus killing of the QS mutants. S. aureus killing of P. aeruginosa PA14 (WT) and its mutants (pqsA, lasRpqsA, and lasRmvfR) was monitored on the cell lawns of S. aureus SA3 (A) and m5 (B). The residual killing activity is indicated by arrowheads.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 795-803https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2312.12028

Fig 4.

Figure 4.S. aureus killing of the isolated mutants. (A) Positions of P. aeruginosa PA14 (WT) and its mutant (lasR, lasRmvfR, lasRmvfRcysB, lasRmvfRcysG, and lasRmvfRtruB) cells spots in B that had been applied to S. aureus killing plate assay as in Fig. 3. (B) S. aureus killing of P. aeruginosa cells as in A was monitored on the cell lawns of S. aureus m5 and its mutants (saeS and comEC). The disappearance of the residual killing activity of lasRmvfR is indicated by dotted arrowheads.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 795-803https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2312.12028

Fig 5.

Figure 5.S. aureus-killing and autolysis suppression of the isolated mutants. (A) S. aureus killing of P. aeruginosa PA14 (WT) and its mutants (lasR, lasRmvfR, and lasRmvfRcysG) cells was monitored after growth competition between one of them and S. aureus (m5, saeS, and comEC) in 24-h liquid culture. Culture suspensions were diluted and spotted on LB plates amended with either 5% NaCl (to select S. aureus) or 50 μg/ml rifampicin (to select P. aeruginosa). The numbers indicate the dilution folds of the culture suspension. (B) Autolysis of P. aeruginosa PA14 (WT) and its mutants (lasRmvfR, lasRmvfRcysB, lasRmvfRcysG, and lasRmvfRtruB) was monitored from the 48-well LBN cultures in the presence or absence (-) of S. aureus strains (SA3, m5, saeS and comEC), which were grown at 37°C for 24 h.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 795-803https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2312.12028

Fig 6.

Figure 6.Autolysis suppression of the extracellular proteins and metals. (A) Profiles of extracellular proteins from S. aureus m5 and its mutants (saeS and comEC) were analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE. The size markers (M) are included with the molecular weight (kDa) of representative bands. (B and C) Autolysis of P. aeruginosa PA14 was monitored from the 24-h 48- well LBN cultures in the presence of either ammonium sulfate ((NH4)2SO4) precipitate fractions (B) at the indicated concentrations (50%, 65%, 80%, and 95%) or metal ions (C).
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 795-803https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2312.12028

Table 1 . Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study..

Strain or plasmidRelevant characteristics or purposeaReference or source
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
PA14Wild type laboratory strain; RifRLaboratory collection
PA14 lasRPA14 with in-frame deletion of lasR; RifR[18]
PA14 mvfRPA14 with in-frame deletion of mvfR; RifRThis study
PA14 pqsAPA14 with in-frame deletion of pqsA; RifR[37]
PA14 lasRpqsAPA14 with in-frame deletion of lasRpqsA; RifRThis study
PA14 lasRmvfRPA14 with in-frame deletion of lasRmvfR; RifRThis study
PA14 lasRmvfRcysBPA14 with in-frame deletion of lasRmvfRcysB; RifRThis study
PA14 lasRmvfRcysGPA14 with in-frame deletion of lasRmvfRcysG; RifRThis study
PA14 lasRmvfRtruBPA14 with in-frame deletion of lasRmvfRtruB; RifRThis study
Staphylococcus aureus
NewmanWild type laboratory strain (MSSA); methicillin-sensitiveLaboratory collection
SA3Wild type laboratory strain (MRSA); McRLaboratory collection
m5Respiratory mutant of SA3; McR[17]
m5 saeSm5 with Tn917 insertion in saeS; McR EmRThis study
m5 comECm5 with Tn917 insertion in comEC; McR EmRThis study
Escherichia coli
DH5αMultipurpose cloningLaboratory collection
S17-1(λpir)Conjugal transfer of mobilizable plasmidsLaboratory collection
S17-1(λpir)(pBTK30)S17-1(λpir) harboring pBTK30 for mariner transposon insertion; GmR CbRLaboratory collection
Plasmids
pEX18TAllelic exchange by homologous recombinationLaboratory collection
pTV1Insertional mutagenesis by the transposon Tn917; CmR EmR[35]
pEX18T-cysBpEX18T with in-frame deletion in the cysB gene; CbRThis study
pEX18T-cysGpEX18T with in-frame deletion in the cysG gene; CbRThis study
pEX18T-truBpEX18T with in-frame deletion in the truB gene; CbRThis study

aRifR, rifampicin-resistant; McR, methicillin-resistant; GmR, gentamicin-resistant; CbR, carbenicillin- and ampicillin-resistant; CmR, chloramphenicol-resistant; EmR, erythromycin-resistant.


Table 2 . Primers and probes used in this study..

Primer or probeRelevant characteristics or purposeOligonucleotide sequence (5'–3')a
mvfR-OFSOEing PCR for mvfR in-frame deletionGAATTCACGAGCAATATGA
mvfR-IRSOEing PCR for mvfR in-frame deletionCGCGCAGGCGCTGGGCGATGACCTGGAGGAA
mvfR-IFSOEing PCR for mvfR in-frame deletionCCAGGTCATCGCCCAGCGCCTGCGCGAACTGG
mvfR-ORSOEing PCR for mvfR in-frame deletionCTGCAGCATGGCAAGAGC
cysB-OFSOEing PCR for cysB in-frame deletionGAATTCGCAGGCTGGATGGTC
cysB-IRSOEing PCR for cysB in-frame deletionGGAGGACGAACTGGGCGGCTTCATGTGCGACT
cysB-IFSOEing PCR for cysB in-frame deletionAGTCGCACATGAAGCCGCCCAGTTCGTCCTCC
cysB-ORSOEing PCR for cysB in-frame deletionGGATCCTCGCCGGCAGCCATA
cysG-OFSOEing PCR for cysG in-frame deletionGGTACCCAGCCAGGACAAGTAC
cysG-IRSOEing PCR for cysG in-frame deletionGCTCAGCCACCAGTTGCGCGCCGGCGTCGGCC
cysG-IFSOEing PCR for cysG in-frame deletionGGCCGACGCCGGCGCGCAACTGGTGGCTGAGC
cysG-ORSOEing PCR for cysG in-frame deletionGGATCCTGCGGCGCATCGAAGAC
truB-OFSOEing PCR for truB in-frame deletionGGATCCTGTTGATGTTGGCGG
truB-IRSOEing PCR for truB in-frame deletionGAGCGTGGCCCAGGTGTGATGCCGGAAGACAG
truB-IFSOEing PCR for truB in-frame deletionCTGTCTTCCGGCATCACACCTGGGCCACGCTC
truB-ORSOEing PCR for truB in-frame deletionAAGCTTACAGCCGTACCCAGC
PA-ArbM1Arbitrary PCR for transposon insertion site mappingCTTACCAGGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTACNNNNNNNNNNGATAT
PA-ArbM2Arbitrary PCR for transposon insertion site mappingCTTACCAGGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTAC
Arb1-BTKArbitrary PCR for transposon insertion site mappingCACCGCTGCGTTCGGTCAAG
Arb2-BTKArbitrary PCR for transposon insertion site mappingCGAACCGAACAGGCCTTATGTTCAATTC
Seq-BTKSequencing of arbitrary PCR ampliconsGGATGAAGTGGTTCGCATCCTC
SA-ArbA1Arbitrary PCR for transposon insertion site mappingGGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTCANNNNNNNNGATCA
SA-ArbA2Arbitrary PCR for transposon insertion site mappingGGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTCA
Arb1-Tn917Arbitrary PCR for transposon insertion site mappingCACCTGCAATAACCGTTACCTG
Arb2-Tn917Arbitrary PCR for transposon insertion site mappingTCACAATAGAGAGATGTCACCG
Seq-Tn917Sequencing of arbitrary PCR ampliconsCCAATCACTCTCGGACAATAC

aUnderlining denotes the engineered restriction enzyme sites.


References

  1. Filkins LM, O'Toole GA. 2015. Cystic fibrosis lung infections: polymicrobial, complex, and hard to treat. PLoS Pathog. 11: e1005258.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  2. Khanolkar RA, Clark ST, Wang PW, Hwang DM, Yau YC, Waters VJ, et al. 2020. Ecological succession of polymicrobial communities in the cystic fibrosis airways. mSystems 5: 10-1128.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Camus L, Briaud P, Vandenesch F, Moreau K. 2021. How bacterial adaptation to cystic fibrosis environment shapes interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Microbiol. 12: 617784.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. De Oliveira DM, Forde BM, Kidd TJ, Harris PN, Schembri MA, Beatson SA, et al. 2020. Antimicrobial resistance in ESKAPE pathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 33: 10-1128.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Filkins LM, Graber JA, Olson DG, Dolben EL, Lynd LR, Bhuju S, et al. 2015. Coculture of Staphylococcus aureus with Pseudomonas aeruginosa drives S. aureus towards fermentative metabolism and reduced viability in a cystic fibrosis model. J. Bacteriol. 197: 2252-2264.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Ibberson CB, Stacy A, Fleming D, Dees JL, Rumbaugh K, Gilmore MS, et al. 2017. Co-infecting microorganisms dramatically alter pathogen gene essentiality during polymicrobial infection. Nat. Microbiol. 2: 1-6.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Mashburn LM, Jett AM, Akins DR, Whiteley M. 2005. Staphylococcus aureus serves as an iron source for Pseudomonas aeruginosa during in vivo coculture. J. Bacteriol. 187: 554-566.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Barnabie PM, Whiteley M. 2015. Iron-mediated control of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Staphylococcus aureus interactions in the cystic fibrosis lung. J. Bacteriol. 197: 2250-2251.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. McNamara PJ, Proctor RA. 2000. Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants, electron transport and persistent infections. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 14: 117-122.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Hoffman LR, Déziel E, D'Argenio DA, Lépine F, Emerson J, McNamara S, et al. 2006. Selection for Staphylococcus aureus smallcolony variants due to growth in the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 19890-19895.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. D'Argenio DA, Calfee MW, Rainey PB, Pesci EC. 2002. Autolysis and autoaggregation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa colony morphology mutants. J. Bacteriol. 184: 6481-6489.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  12. D'Argenio DA, Wu M, Hoffman LR, Kulasekara HD, Déziel E, Smith EE, et al. 2007. Growth phenotypes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lasR mutants adapted to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Mol. Microbiol. 64: 512-533.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Déziel E, Lépine F, Milot S, He J, Mindrinos MN, Tompkins RG, et al. 2004. Analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4-hydroxy-2-alkylquinolines (HAQs) reveals a role for 4-hydroxy-2-heptylquinoline in cell-to-cell communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 1339-1344.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Hazan R, Que YA, Maura D, Strobel B, Majcherczyk PA, Hopper LR, et al. 2016. Auto poisoning of the respiratory chain by a quorumsensing-regulated molecule favors biofilm formation and antibiotic tolerance. Curr. Biol. 26: 195-206.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Michelsen CF, Christensen AMJ, Bojer MS, Høiby N, Ingmer H, Jelsbak L. 2014. Staphylococcus aureus alters growth activity, autolysis, and antibiotic tolerance in a human host-adapted Pseudomonas aeruginosa lineage. J. Bacteriol. 196: 3903-3911.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. Kim BO, Jang HJ, Chung IY, Bae HW, Kim ES, Cho YH. 2021a. Nitrate respiration promotes polymyxin B resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 34: 442-451.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Jang HJ, Chung IY, Lim C, Chung S, Kim BO, Kim ES, et al. 2019. Redirecting an anticancer to an antibacterial hit against methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Microbiol. 10: 350.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Park SY, Heo YJ, Choi YS, Déziel E, Cho YH. 2005. Conserved virulence factors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa are required for killing Bacillus subtilis. J. Microbiol. 43: 443-450.
  19. Hoang C, Ferré-D'Amaré AR. 2001. Cocrystal structure of a tRNA Ψ55 pseudouridine synthase: nucleotide flipping by an RNAmodifying enzyme. Cell 107: 929-939.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Ahn KS, Ha U, Jia J, Wu D, Jin S. 2004. The truA gene of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is required for the expression of type III secretory genes. Microbiology 150: 539-547.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Kredich NM. 2008. Biosynthesis of cysteine. EcoSal Plus 3: 10-1128.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Stroupe ME, Leech HK, Daniels DS, Warren MJ, Getzoff ED. 2003. CysG structure reveals tetrapyrrole-binding features and novel regulation of siroheme biosynthesis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 10: 1064-1073.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Storbeck S, Walther J, Müller J, Parmar V, Schiebel HM, Kemken D, et al. 2009. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa nirE gene encodes the S‐adenosyl‐L‐methionine‐dependent uroporphyrinogen III methyltransferase required for heme d1 biosynthesis. FEBS J. 276: 5973-5982.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Murphy MJ, Siegel LM, Tove SR, Kamin H. 1974. Siroheme: a new prosthetic group participating in six-electron reduction reactions catalyzed by both sulfite and nitrite reductases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71: 612-616.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  25. Novick RP, Jiang D. 2003. The staphylococcal saeRS system coordinates environmental signals with agr quorum sensing. Microbiology 149: 2709-2717.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Burton B, Dubnau D. 2010. Membrane-associated DNA transport machines. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2: a000406.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  27. Stacy A, McNally L, Darch SE, Brown SP, Whiteley M. 2016. The biogeography of polymicrobial infection. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14: 93-105.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  28. Darveau RP. 2010. Periodontitis: a polymicrobial disruption of host homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8: 481-490.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Korgaonkar A, Trivedi U, Rumbaugh KP, Whiteley M. 2013. Community surveillance enhances Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence during polymicrobial infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110: 1059-1064.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Lee YJ, Jang HJ, Chung IY, Cho YH. 2018. Drosophila melanogaster as a polymicrobial infection model for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Microbiol. 56: 534-541.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Jenul C, Keim KC, Jens JN, Zeiler MJ, Schilcher K, Schurr MJ, et al. 2023. Pyochelin biotransformation by Staphylococcus aureus shapes bacterial competition with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in polymicrobial infections. Cell Rep. 42: 112540.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Orazi G, O'Toole GA. 2017. Pseudomonas aeruginosa alters Staphylococcus aureus sensitivity to vancomycin in a biofilm model of cystic fibrosis infection. mBio 8: e00873-17.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Lee YJ. 2019. Roles of the quorum-sensing circuits in interaction between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Master thesis. CHA university.
  34. Goodman AL, Kulasekara B, Rietsch A, Boyd D, Smith RS, Lory S. 2004. A signaling network reciprocally regulates genes associated with acute infection and chronic persistence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Dev. Cell 7: 745-754.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Bae T, Banger AK, Wallace A, Glass EM, Åslund F, Schneewind O, et al. 2004. Staphylococcus aureus virulence genes identified by bursa aurealis mutagenesis and nematode killing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 12312-12317.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  36. Kim ES, Lee JY, Park C, Ahn SJ, Bae HW, Cho YH. 2021b. cDNA-derived RNA phage assembly reveals critical residues in the maturation protein of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa leviphage PP7. J. Virol. 95: 10-1128.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  37. Kim K, Kim YU, Koh BH, Hwang SS, Kim SH, Lépine F, et al. 2010. HHQ and PQS, two Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum‐sensing molecules, down‐regulate the innate immune responses through the nuclear factor‐κB pathway. Immunology 129: 578-588.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef