전체메뉴

JMB Journal of Microbiolog and Biotechnology

QR Code QR Code

Research article


References

  1. Occhialini A, Hofreuter D, Ufermann C-M, Al Dahouk S, Köhler S. 2022. The retrospective on atypical Brucella species leads to novel definitions. Microorganisms 10: 813.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  2. Laine CG, Johnson VE, Scott HM, Arenas-Gamboa AM. 2023. Global estimate of human brucellosis incidence. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 29: 1789.
    CrossRef
  3. Bosilkovski M, Keramat F, Arapović J. 2021. The current therapeutical strategies in human brucellosis. Infection 49: 823-832.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Carvalho TF, Haddad JPA, Paixao TA, Santos RL. 2016. Meta-analysis and advancement of brucellosis vaccinology. PLoS One 11: e0166582.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  5. Mirzaei R, Sholeh M, Jalalifar S, Zafari E, Kazemi S, Rasouli-Saravani A, et al. 2021. Immunometabolism in human brucellosis: an emerging field of investigation. Microb. Pathog. 158: 105115.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Pfortmueller CA, Schefold JC. 2017. Hypertonic saline in critical illness-a systematic review. J. Crit. Care 42: 168-177.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Kølsen‐Petersen J. 2004. Immune effect of hypertonic saline: fact or fiction? Acta. Anaesthesiol. Scand. 48: 667-678.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Oliveira RP, Velasco I, Soriano FG, Friedman G. 2002. Clinical review: hypertonic saline resuscitation in sepsis. Crit. Care 6: 1-6.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  9. Coimbra R, Hoyt DB, Junger WG, Angle N, Wolf P, Loomis W, et al. 1997. Hypertonic saline resuscitation decreases susceptibility to sepsis after hemorrhagic shock. J. Trauma. Acute. Care Surg. 42: 602-607.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Mitra S, Schiller D, Anderson C, Gamboni F, D'Alessandro A, Kelher M, et al. 2017. Hypertonic saline attenuates the cytokineinduced pro-inflammatory signature in primary human lung epithelia. PLoS. One 12: e0189536.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  11. Coelho AMM, Jukemura J, Sampietre SN, Martins JO, Molan NA, Patzina RA, et al. 2010. Mechanisms of the beneficial effect of hypertonic saline solution in acute pancreatitis. Shock 34: 502-507.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Sposito F, Northey S, Charras A, McNamara PS, Hedrich CM. 2023. Hypertonic saline induces inflammation in human macrophages through the NLRP1 inflammasome. Genes. Immun. 24: 263-269.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  13. Shields CJ, O'Sullivan AW, Wang JH, Winter DC, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP. 2003. Hypertonic saline enhances host response to bacterial challenge by augmenting receptor-independent neutrophil intracellular superoxide formation. Ann. Surg. 238: 249-257.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  14. Chen L-W, Huang H-L, Lee I-T, Hsu C-M, Lu P-J. 2006. Hypertonic saline enhances host defense to bacterial challenge by augmenting toll-like receptors. Crit. Care. Med. 34: 1758-1768.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Zhang W-C, Du L-J, Zheng X-J, Chen X-Q, Shi C, Chen B-Y, et al. 2018. Elevated sodium chloride drives type I interferon signaling in macrophages and increases antiviral resistance. J. Biol. Chem. 293: 1030-1039.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  16. Michon A-L, Jumas-Bilak E, Chiron R, Lamy B, Marchandin H. 2014. Advances toward the elucidation of hypertonic saline effects on Pseudomonas aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis patients. PLoS One 9: e90164.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  17. Degos C, Gagnaire A, Banchereau R, Moriyón I, Gorvel J-P. 2015. Brucella CβG induces a dual pro-and anti-inflammatory response leading to a transient neutrophil recruitment. Virulence 6: 19-28.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  18. Akbulut HH, Kilic SS, Bulut V, Ozden M. 2005. Determination of intracellular cytokines produced by Th1 and Th2 cells using flow cytometry in patients with brucellosis. FEMS. Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 45: 253-258.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Elfaki MG, Alaidan AA, Al-Hokail AA. 2015. Host response to Brucella infection: review and future perspective. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries 9: 697-701.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Lopez-Santiago R, Sanchez-Argaez AB, De Alba-Nunez LG, Baltierra-Uribe SL, Moreno-Lafont MC. 2019. Immune response to mucosal Brucella infection. Front. Immunol. 10: 1759.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  21. Rossetti CA, Drake KL, Siddavatam P, Lawhon SD, Nunes JE, Gull T, et al. 2013. Systems biology analysis of Brucella infected Peyer's patch reveals rapid invasion with modest transient perturbations of the host transcriptome. PLoS One 8: e81719.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  22. Dorneles EM, Teixeira-Carvalho A, Araújo MS, Sriranganathan N, Lage AP. 2015. Immune response triggered by Brucella abortus following infection or vaccination. Vaccine 33: 3659-3666.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Martirosyan A, Moreno E, Gorvel JP. 2011. An evolutionary strategy for a stealthy intracellular Brucella pathogen. Immunol. Rev. 240: 211-234.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Priyanka, Shringi BN, Choudhary OP, Kashyap SK. 2021. Cytokines in brucellosis: biological rhythm at the interface of innate and adaptive immunity. Biol. Rhythm. Res. 52: 1031-1043.
    CrossRef
  25. Baldwin CL, Goenka R. 2006. Host immune responses to the intracellular bacteria Brucella: does the bacteria instruct the host to facilitate chronic infection? Crit. Rev. Immunol. 26: 407-442.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Hop HT, Reyes AW, Huy TX, Arayan LT, Min W, Lee HJ, et al. 2017. Activation of NF-ĸB-mediated TNF-induced antimicrobial immunity is required for the efficient Brucella abortus clearance in RAW 264.7 cells. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 7: 437.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  27. Hop HT, Huy TXN, Reyes AWB, Arayan LT, Vu SH, Min W, et al. 2019. Interleukin 6 promotes Brucella abortus clearance by controlling bactericidal activity of macrophages and CD8+ T cell differentiation. Infect. Immun. 87: 10.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  28. Hiz P, Kanbur E, Demir N, Akalin H, Cagan E, Pashazadeh M, et al. 2020. Roles of novel IL-1 family (IL-36, IL-37, and IL-38) members in chronic brucellosis. Cytokine 135: 155211.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Ip WE, Medzhitov R. 2015. Macrophages monitor tissue osmolarity and induce inflammatory response through NLRP3 and NLRC4 inflammasome activation. Nat. Commun. 6: 6931.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  30. Sakata F, Ito Y, Mizuno M, Sawai A, Suzuki Y, Tomita T, et al. 2017. Sodium chloride promotes tissue inflammation via osmotic stimuli in subtotal-nephrectomized mice. Lab. Invest. 97: 432-446.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Oreopoulos GD, Bradwell S, Lu Z, Fan J, Khadaroo R, Marshall JC, et al. 2001. Synergistic induction of IL-10 by hypertonic saline solution and lipopolysaccharides in murine peritoneal macrophages. Surgery 130: 157-165.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Xavier MN, Winter MG, Spees AM, Nguyen K, Atluri VL, Silva TM, et al. 2013. CD4+ T cell-derived IL-10 promotes Brucella abortus persistence via modulation of macrophage function. PLoS Pathog. 9: e1003454.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  33. Jantsch J, Schatz V, Friedrich D, Schröder A, Kopp C, Siegert I, et al. 2015. Cutaneous Na+ storage strengthens the antimicrobial barrier function of the skin and boosts macrophage-driven host defense. Cell. Metab. 21: 493-501.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  34. Martirosyan A, Gorvel J-P. 2013. Brucella evasion of adaptive immunity. Future. Microbiol. 8: 147-154.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Golding B, Scott DE, Scharf O, Huang L-Y, Zaitseva M, Lapham C, et al. 2001. Immunity and protection against Brucella abortus. Microbes. Infect. 3: 43-48.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Barrionuevo P, Delpino MV, Pozner RG, Velásquez LN, Cassataro J, Giambartolomei GH. 2013. Brucella abortus induces intracellular retention of MHC‐I molecules in human macrophages down‐modulating cytotoxic CD8+ T cell responses. Cell. Microbiol. 15: 487-502.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  37. Guimarães G, Gomes MTR, Campos PC, Marinho FV, de Assis NR, Silveira TN, et al. 2018. Immunoproteasome subunits are required for CD8+ T cell function and host resistance to Brucella abortus infection in mice. Infect. Immun. 86: e00615-17.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  38. Starr T, Child R, Wehrly TD, Hansen B, Hwang S, López-Otin C, et al. 2012. Selective subversion of autophagy complexes facilitates completion of the Brucella intracellular cycle. Cell. Host. Microbe. 11: 33-45.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  39. Guo F, Li Z, Chen C, Wang Y, Zhang H, Wang P, et al. 2011. Role of autophagy in inhibition of Brucella-containing vacuole-lysosome fusion in murine macrophages. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 5: 3778-3783.
    CrossRef
  40. McCarthy CG, Chakraborty S, Singh G, San Yeoh B, Schreckenberger ZJ, Singh A, et al. 2021. Ketone body β-hydroxybutyrate is an autophagy-dependent vasodilator. JCI. Insight 6: e149037.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  41. Forte M, Bianchi F, Cotugno M, Marchitti S, De Falco E, Raffa S, et al. 2020. Pharmacological restoration of autophagy reduces hypertension-related stroke occurrence. Autophagy 16: 1468-1481.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  42. Corcelle E, Djerbi N, Mari M, Nebout M, Fiorini C, Fénichel P, et al. 2007. Control of the autophagy maturation step by the MAPK ERK and p38: lessons from environmental carcinogens. Autophagy 3: 57-59.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  43. Kim K-Y, Park K-I, Kim S-H, Yu S-N, Park S-G, Kim YW, et al. 2017. Inhibition of autophagy promotes salinomycin-induced apoptosis via reactive oxygen species-mediated PI3K/AKT/mTOR and ERK/p38 MAPK-dependent signaling in human prostate cancer cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18: 1088.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  44. Deree J, Melbostad H, Loomis WH, Putnam JG, Coimbra R. 2007. The effects of a novel resuscitation strategy combining pentoxifylline and hypertonic saline on neutrophil MAPK signaling. Surgery 142: 276-283.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  45. Cervantes-Flores M, Martínez-Romero A, Ramírez-Valles EG, Mendiola LS, Moreno-Lafont MC, López-Moreno R, et al. 2011. NFκB is differentially activated in macrophages from J774A.1 cell line infected with vaccine or virulent strains of Brucella abortus. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 5: 4227-4231.
    CrossRef
  46. Zhao T, Zhang Z, Li Y, Sun Z, Liu L, Deng X, et al. 2023. Brucella abortus modulates macrophage polarization and inflammatory response by targeting glutaminases through the NF-κB signaling pathway. Front. Immunol. 14: 1180837.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  47. Caamano J, Hunter CA. 2002. NF-κB family of transcription factors: central regulators of innate and adaptive immune functions. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15: 414-429.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  48. Zhang D, Wang C, Cao S, Ye Z, Deng B, Kijlstra A, et al. 2015. High-salt enhances the inflammatory response by retina pigment epithelium cells following lipopolysaccharide stimulation. Mediators. Inflamm. 2015: 197512.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef

Related articles in JMB

More Related Articles

Article

Research article

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024; 34(11): 2192-2200

Published online November 28, 2024 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2407.07040

Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Hypertonic Saline Induces Host Protective Immune Responses against Brucella abortus Infection in Mice

Tran Xuan Ngoc Huy1,2, Trang Thi Nguyen2, Said Abdi Salad2, Ched Nicole Turbela Aguilar2, Alisha Wehdnesday Bernardo Reyes3, Lauren Togonon Arayan4, WonGi Min2, Hu Jang Lee2, Huynh Tan Hop5*, and Suk Kim2*

1Institute of Applied Sciences, HUTECH University, 475A Dien Bien Phu St., Ward 25, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
2Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea
3Department of Veterinary Paraclinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, 4031, Philippines
4The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA
5University Center for Bioscience and Biotechnology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

Correspondence to:Suk Kim,     kimsuk@gnu.ac.kr

Received: July 22, 2024; Revised: August 27, 2024; Accepted: August 29, 2024

Abstract

Hypertonic saline (HTS) resuscitation can enhance immune responses against various pathogens, however, the effect of HTS on brucellosis is yet to be defined. In this study, we found that HTS inhibited Brucella infection in mice by augmenting Th1 immunity. HTS treatment enhanced the serum cytokines production and the expression of nitric oxide synthase (NOS2) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-ĸB) p50 and p65, crucial anti-Brucella effectors in splenocytes. In addition, HTS treatment also inhibited the phosphorylation of MAPK signaling, accompanied by the down-regulation of the autophagy marker LC3B-II. Due to directing an appropriate immune response, HTS treatment substantially decreased bacterial burden in spleen and liver tissues. In summary, corroborating previous studies showing the antimicrobial effects of HTS, our findings indicate that HTS treatment triggers a protective immune response against Brucella infection. Additionally, these results provide promising evidence of the immunomodulatory role of HTS in controlling bacterial infections.

Keywords: Brucella abortus, hypertonic saline, immune response, cytokines, transcription factor

Introduction

Brucella (B.) species are Gram-negative, facultative intracellular bacteria. They are the causative agents of brucellosis in animals and humans. To date, twelve species of Brucella have infected various hosts including B. abortus (cattle and buffaloes), B. melitensis (sheep, goats and camels), B. canis (dogs), B. ovis (sheep), B. inopinata (human), B. suis (pigs, hares, reindeers and wild boars), B. microti (common vole), B. neotomae (desert woodrats), B. papionis (baboons), B. vulpis (foxes), B. pinnipedialis (seals, sea lions and walruses), B. ceti (whales, porpoises and dolphins). Brucella infection has spread widely among terrestrial and marine mammals [1]. Among them, B. abortus, B. melitensis and B. suis are the most common causes of infection in humans with approximately 1.6 to 2.1 million new cases annually, putting approximately 3.5 billion people at risk for brucellosis globally [2, 3]. However, there are currently no adequate licensed vaccines for preventing human brucellosis while the live attenuated vaccines including B. abortus S19, B. abortus RB51 and B. melitensis Rev.1 have been mostly used to prevent animal brucellosis [4]. In the context of brucellosis treatment, criteria such as a decrease in symptomatic time, relapse, complications, mortality or chronicity are proposed gold standards. Based on these criteria, the uses of antimicrobial drugs, surgical treatments, traditional medicine, or nanotechnology therapy yield protective efficiency but have been controversial [3]. Therefore, alternative therapies for treating or preventing brucellosis related to immunomodulation and immunometabolism that target host and pathogen interactions have recently been investigated as an emerging field [5].

Hypertonic saline (HTS) resuscitation or hypertonic saline infusion affects a wide range of physiological and immune responses. In particular, HTS treatment mediates hemodynamics, efficient plasma volume expansion, electrolyte changes as well as functions of immune cells such as neutrophil granulocytes, mononuclear phagocyte systems, natural killer cells, lymphocytes, and complement systems [6-8]. A study conducted by Coimbra et al. [9] demonstrated a protective efficiency of HTS against mortality and bacteremia in sepsis after hemorrhage in a BALB/c mouse model. Interestingly, HTS was demonstrated to affect host inflammatory responses through regulation of cytokines/chemokines, signaling pathways/transcription factors expression. HTS is considered an anti-inflammatory agent, effectively reducing pro-inflammatory responses in the primary human small airway lung epithelial cells. In addition, the anti-inflammatory effect of HTS was observed in an acute pancreatitis rat model, where the expression of Cox2, nitric oxide (NO), and inflammatory cytokines was inhibited in HTS-treated rats [10, 11]. On the contrary, using 3% of NaCl induced inflammatory responses in human THP-1 macrophage cells benefits patients suffering from chronic airway disease [12]. Notably, another study where mice were subjected to sepsis by infection with a sublethal dose of live Escherichia (E.) coli, followed by HTS treatment, led to the enhancement of host protective responses to eliminate bacterial infection [13, 14]. In addition, a high salt diet was proven to protect mice from the lethal vesicle stomatitis virus infection, and HTS inhibited the growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from cystic fibrosis patients [15, 16]. With potential effects on host immunity against bacterial infection and trauma, we hypothesize that HTS can trigger immunomodulatory responses against B. abortus infection, which has not yet been elucidated. Particularly, in this study, BALB/c mice were subjected to HTS treatment during Brucella infection. Afterward, immunological properties stimulated by HTS including pro-inflammatory, anti-inflammatory cytokines production, cell signal transduction and autophagy expression were evaluated.

Materials and Methods

Animals and Bacterial Growth Condition

Female BALB/c mice, eight weeks old (Samtako, Inc., Republic of Korea), were randomly allocated into four experimental groups with six mice per group. All mice were acclimatized for one week before bacterial infection. The animal experiment protocol in this study was approved by the Animal Ethical Committee of Chonbuk National University (Authorization Number JBNU-2022-017-001).

The smooth, virulent, wild-type B. abortus 544 biovar 1 strain (ATCC 23448) was cultured in Brucella broth (BBL BD, USA) at 37°C with vigorous shaking for two days until stationary phase at a biosafety laboratory level 3 (BSL3) containment facility. In addition, viable bacteria were maintained and measured by streaking or plating serial dilutions on Brucella broth containing 1.5% agar (VWR, USA), respectively.

Animal Experiments and Protection Assay

After one week of acclimation, two groups were not infected, and another two groups were intraperitoneally infected with B. abortus 544 at a concentration of 5 × 105 colony forming unit (CFU)/mouse in a total volume of 100 μl in PBS. After infection, mice were received 100 μl HTS (200 mM NaCl) or PBS orally by gavage and daily for 14 days. At day 14 post-infection, peripheral blood samples were collected via tail vein to obtain sera and then all mice were sacrificed. Spleen and liver samples were collected, and their total weights were measured to determine splenomegaly and hepatomegaly. To evaluate the effect of HTS treatment on protective efficiency against Brucella infection, a 0.05 g part of the spleen or liver was aseptically sliced and homogenized in 1 ml PBS and subjected to 10-fold dilution using PBS. Finally, 50 μl of the dilution was plated onto Brucella agar, and the base-10 logarithm of the number of CFU of each sample was calculated.

Serum Cytokines/Chemokines Level Measurement

Sera were collected from peripheral blood by centrifugation at 2,000 ×g at 4°C for 10 min. The concentration of IFN-γ, IL-10, TNF-α, IL-6 cytokines and MCP-1 chemokine were measured by Cytometric Bead Array (CBA Mouse inflammation kit, BD Biosciences, USA). Data were acquired and analyzed using BD FACSVerse flow cytometry. The production of IL-2 and IL-4 cytokines were determined by sandwich ELISAs (Abcam, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Total RNA Extraction from Spleen and cDNA Synthesis

At 14 days post-infection, spleens were collected and the total RNA in spleen was extracted using Riboex reagent (Geneall, Korea) and RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany). All the procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In addition, the genomic DNA contamination was removed by RNase-free DNase (Qiagen). The concentration of purified RNA was measured using a Nanodrop UV/VIS spectrophotometer (Optizen, Republic of Korea). A 1 μg of purified RNA was reverse transcripted into complementary DNA (cDNA) using a Quantitech Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen) for all samples. The synthesized cDNA was used as the template for the quantitation of gene expression in splenic cells.

Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)

The expression of genes related to mouse immune responses was assessed through qRT-PCR. Briefly, a qRT-PCR reaction mixture contained a total volume of 20 μl including cDNA template, distilled water, primer pairs and SYBR Green master mix (Promega, USA). qRT-PCR was performed on CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, USA) with the following thermal cycling conditions: 95°C for 10 min, 39 cycles with 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. The melting curve analysis was performed from 65°C to 95°C with an increment of 1°C each 5 s to confirm the amplification efficiency of each primer pair for their specific gene. The acquired results were analyzed using Bio-Rad CFX Manager software, version 3.1. The relative fold change of the mRNA level was quantified using ΔΔCt method with β-acin used as a reference gene. The list of all primer pairs are given in Table 1.

Table 1 . Primer sequences used for qRT-PCR..

GeneCommon nameForward primerReverse primer
Il2Interleukin 25’- CTGGGGAGTTTCAGGTTCCTG -3’5’- CTCGCATCCTGTGTCACATTG -3’
Il4Interleukin 45’- GTCATCCTGCTCTTCTTTCTC -3’5’- CACCTTGGAAGCCCTACAGAC -3’
Il1bInterleukin 1β5’- -CAACCACACAAGTGATATTC-3’5’- GGATCCACACTCTCCAGCTG-3’
Nos2Nitric oxide synthase 25’- GGAGGTGCTTGAAGAGTTCC -3’5’- AGGAGGTGATGGAGTAGTAGC -3’
b-actinβ-actin5’- CGCCACCAGTTCGCCATGGA-3’5’- TACAGCCCGGGGAGCATCGT-3’


Total Protein Extraction from Spleen Samples

The spleen samples were lysed in Radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer (Santa Cruz, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. After centrifugation at 13,000 ×g for 15 min at 4°C, the supernatant containing the total proteins was collected. After that, the total protein concentration was measured using the Bradford method (Bio-Rad). All samples were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blotting assay.

Immunoblot Analysis

All samples containing equal amounts of proteins were denatured and reduced by boiling in 2x SDS buffer (Bio-Rad) for 5 min. After that, all samples were separated by SDS-PAGE. The proteins were transferred onto Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore, USA) using 1x transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine and 20%methanol). The membranes were then blocked with blocking buffer (5% skim milk in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20, PBS-T) at room temperature (RT) for 30 min and probed with the primary antibodies to detect phospho-p38, phospho-ERK1/2, phospho-JNK, phospho-NF-ĸB-p50 and p60, LC3B-I, LC3B-II, iNOS and IL-1β overnight at 4°C. The membranes were washed three times with PBS-T and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at RT, followed by three times washing with PBS-T. Finally, the signal was detected using ECL reagents (Atto Corp., Japan). The immunoreactive bands were visualized by the Molecular Imager ChemiDoc XRS system machine (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). β-actin was used as a housekeeping protein. All primary and secondary antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling (USA) and diluted with the appropriate ratio in blocking buffer.

Statistical Analysis

The results for each experiment are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) from at least two independent experiments with at least two technical replicates in each experiment unless otherwise defined in the figure legends. Statistical analyses were performed with one-way or two-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons among groups in Prism (GraphPad Software;*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001; ns, not significant).

Results

Profile of Pro-Inflammatory and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines/Chemokine Secretion in Serum

Host pro- and anti-inflammatory responses were triggered upon Brucella infection [17]. The secretion of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines in sera modulates host immunity against Brucella infection. In the uninfected groups, HTS treatment significantly increased the production of TNF-α and IL-10, while there were no differences in the secretion of IFN-γ, MCP-1 and IL-6 between treated and untreated groups. Interestingly, in the infected groups, the results showed a marked enhancement of cytokines IFN-γ, IL-10, TNF-α and IL-6 and chemokine MCP-1 production in the HTS-treated mice compared to untreated mice. These results suggested that HTS treatment significantly activated both pro- and anti-inflammatory responses in the host during Brucella infection (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Cytokine concentrations in the sera of mice treated with HTS. Sera from peripheral blood samples were collected from the tail vein on the 14th day post-infection. The concentrations of IFN-γ, IL-10, MCP-1, TNF-α and IL-6 were analyzed using a cytometric bead array. The data are represented as the mean ± SD of the mean of each group of six sera samples. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001).

HTS Treatment Substantially Increased Host Inflammation

It is well-known that the expression of IL-1β and NOS2 induces host inflammatory responses. In this study, the expression of these markers in splenic cells were evaluated by qRT-PCR and western blotting assay. The transcription of both Il1b and Nos2 genes was similar in uninfected groups with and without HTS treatment, however, Brucella infection induced the expression of these markers and concurrent HTS treatment significantly boosted this induction (Fig. 2A). Likewise, we were unable to detect IL-1β and NOS2 in uninfected cells, however, Brucella infection markedly induced the expression of these proteins, and concurrent HTS treatment elevated this induction (Fig. 2B). These findings demonstrated that HTS treatment significantly activated host inflammation upon Brucella infection.

Figure 2. HTS treatment effect on the expression of IL-1β and iNOS in splenic cells. The transcriptional and translational expression levels of IL-1β and iNOS from splenic cells were quantified by qRT-PCR (A) and western blotting analysis (B), respectively. Asterisks indicate significant differences (***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001).

Effect of HTS on T helper 1 (Th1) and T helper 2 (Th2) T Lymphocytes Responses

Cytokines IL-2 and IL-4 play a dominant role in directing the differentiation of Th0 into Th1 and Th2 T cells, respectively [18]. Therefore, we examined the relevance of IL-2 and IL-4 expression in splenic cells and sera under HTS exposure during Brucella infection. Interestingly, the results proven by qRT-PCR and ELISA showed the same pattern of IL-2 and IL-4 production. Particularly, the IL-2 production from HTS-treated groups was significantly higher than those of untreated groups in both non-infected and infected groups. Notably, a substantial reduction of IL-4 production was observed from the spleens and sera of HTS-treated mice compared to untreated mice upon Brucella infection. These results indicated that the HTS probably directed the T lymphocytes to differentiate into Th1, an essential T cell subset for protection against Brucella infection (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. The effect of HTS on the production of Th1 and Th2 cytokines. Expression of cytokines IL-2 and IL-4 in splenic cells with and without exposure to HTS quantified by qRT-PCR (A) and ELISA (B). The data are represented as the mean ± SD of the mean of each group of six samples. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001).

HTS Treatment Regulated the Signaling Pathways of MAPKs, Autophagy and NF-ĸB

In order to understand the activation of signaling pathways contributing to host immunity under HTS treatment. The expression of MAPK signaling cascade, autophagy markers LC3B-I and LCB-II, and transcription factor NF-ĸB in splenic cells was investigated using western blotting assay. The results showed that the phosphorylation levels of p38, ERK1/2 and JNK were reduced in HTS-treated groups compared to untreated group during Brucella infection. Moreover, in the non-infected groups, HTS treatment slightly increased the expression of p38 (Fig. 4A). On the other hand, in the infected groups, an apparent down-regulation of the lipidated form LC3B-II was observed under HTS treatment (Fig. 4B). NF-ĸB is well-known as a key effector in regulating host immunity and inflammatory responses and we interestingly found that the expression of the members of NF-ĸB family, p50 and p65, were upregulated in splenocytes isolated from the HTS-treated infected group compared with the untreated infected group (Fig. 4C). These findings supported the notion that HTS treatment has effects on regulating signaling pathways that favor host immunity against Brucella infection.

Figure 4. HTS regulates the expression of signaling pathways related to MAPKs (A), autophagy (B) and transcription factor NF-ĸB in splenic cells (C). Total proteins were extracted from mouse spleens by RIPA lysis buffer. The protein samples were subjected to western blotting assay with β-actin used as reference protein.

Protective Efficacy of the HTS Treatment in BALB/c Mice against Brucella Infection

After obtaining potential results related to the immunomodulatory effects of HTS, we elucidated the protective efficacy through the rate of bacterial clearance (log10CFU) together with splenomegaly and hepatomegaly during Brucella systemic infection. In uninfected groups, the total weight of the spleens and livers in HTS-treated groups displayed no difference compared to that of the control groups. Whereas in the case of Brucella challenge, HTS treatment in mice displayed significantly reduced splenomegaly and hepatomegaly compared to the untreated groups. Interestingly, a modest reduction of bacterial load was observed from the spleen of HTS-treated mice (3.65 ± 0.15) compared to control mice (4.18 ± 0.15). The same pattern of protective effect was also found in the liver organ. The results showed that HTS-treated groups (4.23 ± 0.26) exhibited a lower bacterial burden in the liver compared to control mice (4.82 ± 0.17). Taken together, we found that HTS treatment activated host immunity to combat against Brucella systemic infection, accompanied by attenuation of splenomegaly and hepatomegaly (Fig. 5, Table 2).

Table 2 . Protection against B. abortus in mice treated with HTS..

TissuesTreatmentLog10 CFU of bacteria (Mean ± SD)Log protectionP-valuea
SpleenPBS4.18 ± 0.150.53P < 0.05
HTS3.65 ± 0.15
LiverPBS4.82 ± 0.170.59P < 0.05
HTS4.23 ± 0.26

aSignificantly different from PBS-treated mice were estimated by Student’s t-test..


Figure 5. Protection against Brucella in BALB/c mice treated with HTS. BALB/c mice were intraperitoneally challenged with B. abortus, followed by daily oral treatment with HTS for 14 days. On the 14th day post-infection, spleen and liver samples were collected (A) The bacterial burden in spleen and liver were evaluated and calculated with a base- 10 logarithm of the number of CFU (B). At the same time, spleen and liver weights (C) were also measured. The data are represented as the mean ± SD of the mean of each group of six samples. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (*, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001).

Discussion

Brucella species are intracellular pathogenic bacteria that employ stealthy strategies to manipulate host immune systems. These strategies include hindering innate immune recognition, inhibiting phagolysosome fusion, impairing antigen presentation and adaptive immunity initiation, leading to the establishment of chronic infection [19]. At the onset of natural infection, Brucella first contacts the host body through the oral cavity then enters the mucous membranes of the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts, the site for the establishment of Brucella infection [20, 21]. The innate immune system, as the first line of defense against pathogens, can be quickly activated after exposure to bacteria. This rapid response serves to inhibit bacterial replication, reduce the likelihood of systemic infection, and eliminate the infected bacteria at the onset of infection. Among meditators of innate immunity, the secretion of cytokines and chemokines plays an essential role in orchestrating other effectors of innate immunity, and even influencing adaptive immune response, to effectively combat bacterial infection [22]. A conspicuous pathogen-associated molecular pattern of Brucella is lipopolysaccharide, which is recognized by the TLR4-MD2 receptor-coreceptor complex. This binding mediates the production of several cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-12, IL-6, IL-1β, type I interferons, and IL-10 [23, 24]. Indeed, in this study, the stimulation of Brucella infection led to the secretion of cytokines IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10 and chemokine MCP-1. IFN-γ activates macrophages to produce optimal NO and inhibit Brucella growth. Pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α were proven to promote phagolysosome fusion and production of reactive oxygen species, NO. Whereas anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 appears to suppress the production of IFN-γ, rendering the host susceptible to Brucella infection [25-27]. Similar to IL-10, the novel anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-1 family including IL-37 and IL-38 were involved in the regulation of chronic brucellosis [28]. Intriguingly, a growing amount of evidence is accumulating to support the regulatory effects of a high salt level in host pro-inflammatory responses and antimicrobial functions. A study by Chen et al. [14] demonstrated that HTS enhanced bacterial clearance and phagocytic activity by increasing Toll-like receptors (TLR) of inflammatory cells. Moreover, previous studies have shown enhanced systemic inflammatory responses through inflammasome activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine/chemokine production including IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α and MCP-1, in response to high salt level exposure [12, 29, 30]. In this study, we found a significant elevation in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, IFN-γ and chemokine MCP-1 in the sera of mice exposed to HTS. Additionally, the overproduction of IL-10 in sera found in this study under HTS treatment was consistent with that proven in the previous study [31]. We suggest that the reduction of splenomegaly and hepatomegaly shown in this study were possibly affected by this significant enhancement of IL-10. Indeed, the lack of IL-10 caused the initial inflammation and pathology in the spleen and liver of Brucella-infected mice [32]. The induction of inflammatory responses is influenced not only by pro-inflammatory cytokine/chemokines but also by another potent marker of inflammation such as NO. And the effect of HTS on the expression of NO was clearly demonstrated in the present study and reported elsewhere [33]. These results underscore the critical role of HTS in stimulating host innate immune responses by enhancing inflammation.

A shift from a non-specific response against Brucella, innate immunity, to adaptive immune responses activated with an antigen-specific response and acquired immunologic memory. To eradicate Brucella infection at the late stage of infection, adaptive immunity triggers three major responses including activation of brucellacidal activities in macrophages by IFN-γ stimulation, killing of Brucella-infected immune cells by cytotoxic T lymphocytes – a main source of IFN-γ secretion, and opsonization of the pathogen by Th1- type antibody isotypes IgG2a and IgG3 [34, 35]. Th1 and Th2 T lymphocyte subsets are critical regulators affecting the outcome of brucellosis. Herein, cytokines play an important role as a biological rhythm in the priming of Th1 and Th2 activation. IFN-γ and IL-2 production is marker for Th1 priming, while IL-10 and IL-4 production closely relate to Th2. Among them, Th1 cells are well-known as a key effector in the clearance of Brucella infection [24]. In this study, HTS treatment showed increased expression of IL-2 while reducing the Th2 cytokine IL-4. In addition, although our results showed a significant elevation of IL-10 production in sera under HTS treatment, the production of IFN-γ was much higher than IL-10. Moreover, cytokine IFN-γ mainly is produced by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and these T cell populations play essential role in Th1 immunity [36, 37]. Therefore, these findings suggest that Th1 immune response was predominant in Brucella infection during HTS treatment.

Autophagy, a cellular degradation mechanism, is capable of the removal of aged, dysfunctional organelles and the elimination of intracellular microbes. Another of Brucella's stealthy mechanism is the selective subversion of autophagy to favor its intracellular survival. Autophagosomes are activated after Brucella infection, as indicated by an increase in the autophagy marker protein LC3B-II, followed by Brucella replication in its preferred niche, endoplasmic reticulum [38, 39]. Therefore, the expression of LC3B-II under HTS exposure was examined in the present study. As a result, HTS treatment inhibited the expression of LC3B-II during Brucella infection. Previously, the reduction of LC3B-II expression caused by high salt treatment was demonstrated in the context of vasculoprotection [40, 41]. The MAPK signaling cascade was found to regulate the autophagy process. The induction of autophagy by salinomycin, a potent anticancer drug, was decreased by treatment of MAPKs p38 and ERK1/2 signaling cascade inhibitors in prostate cancer cells [42, 43]. Interestingly, in this study, HTS clearly dampened ERK1/2 and p38 activity. This is similar to the previous article, which indicated a negative regulatory effect of HTS on the phosphorylation of p38 and ERK1/2 through PKA signal transduction pathway in a human neutrophil model [44]. These results suggested that HTS treatment dampened the autophagy process by inactivating the signaling pathway MAPKs.

The transcriptional factor NF-ĸB is generally known as a key player in regulating host immune responses. The activation and nuclear translocation of NF-ĸB trigger the transcription of various genes related to innate immunity, which is associated with an inflammatory response for resistance to Brucella infection [45]. A previous study reported the implication of NF-ĸB in the expression of glutaminase gene results in M1 macrophage polarization and release of pro-inflammatory factors TNF-α, NOS, and IL-1β, contributing to Brucella clearance [46]. Moreover, NF-ĸB cascade is a significant contributor to the differentiation of Th1 by activating the production of Th1 cytokines. In this study, an increase in the production of cytokines associated with inflammation and Th1 development was demonstrated under HTS treatment, accompanied by a significant increase in NF-ĸB p50 and p65. Interestingly, our results align with a previous study that reported an increase in the phosphorylation of NF-ĸB and the production of IL-6 and MCP-1 due to high salt [47, 48]. On the other side, having obtained potential results in host immune response that favors Brucella clearance, we finally dissected the protective efficacy of HTS administration against Brucella persistence in the spleen and liver. A protective effect was conferred by HTS treatment against Brucella infection in a mouse model. This result is congruent with a previous study which showed that the HTS treatment significantly dampened the bacterial load in blood, lung, and spleen when mice were subjected to sepsis caused by E. coli in-vivo while increasing the intracellular killing and superoxide generation in neutrophils against E. coli infection in-vitro [13]. These findings suggest a critical role of HTS in augmenting host immune responses, thereby limiting Brucella systemic infection.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides further evidence supporting the beneficial effects of HTS treatment in controlling bacterial infection. HTS positively regulates host immune responses, favoring host resistance and promoting brucellacidal activity. In addition to its critical roles in innate immunity through the activation of the pro-inflammatory cascade, HTS also induces the secretion of Th1 cytokine markers, advancing the host’s killing mechanism to fight off Brucella infection. Both arms of the host immunity were proven to be regulated by the activation of NF-ĸB transcription factor. Another mechanism involved in Brucella resistance within innate immune system is autophagy, which was also down-regulated under HTS treatment through the MAPK signaling pathway. Although this study provided a preliminary understanding of the regulation of innate and adaptive immunity, further investigation into in vitro molecular mechanisms should be conducted to have a more comprehensive insight into the immunomodulatory effects of HTS in the context of Brucella infection.

Ethics Statement

The animal handling and sacrifice conducted in this experiment were reviewed and approved by a responsible authority (Ministry of Education, LML 13-16, Republic of Korea) under approval file number 613-83-00570. All performed procedures were approved by the Animal Ethical Committee of Chonbuk National University (authorization CBNUNON2022-017-001)

Author Contributions

TXNH: Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. TTN: Formal analysis, Writing -review & editing. SAS: Writing - review & editing. CNTA: Writing - review & editing. AWBR: Writing - review & editing. LTA: Writing - review & editing. WM: Conceptualization, Resources. HJL: Conceptualization, Resources. JHL: Conceptualization, Resources. HTH: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing. SK: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing, Project administration.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2018R1D1A3B05048283) and Young Reseacher Program (2018R1D1A1B07048220).

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Cytokine concentrations in the sera of mice treated with HTS. Sera from peripheral blood samples were collected from the tail vein on the 14th day post-infection. The concentrations of IFN-γ, IL-10, MCP-1, TNF-α and IL-6 were analyzed using a cytometric bead array. The data are represented as the mean ± SD of the mean of each group of six sera samples. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001).
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 2192-2200https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2407.07040

Fig 2.

Figure 2.HTS treatment effect on the expression of IL-1β and iNOS in splenic cells. The transcriptional and translational expression levels of IL-1β and iNOS from splenic cells were quantified by qRT-PCR (A) and western blotting analysis (B), respectively. Asterisks indicate significant differences (***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001).
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 2192-2200https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2407.07040

Fig 3.

Figure 3.The effect of HTS on the production of Th1 and Th2 cytokines. Expression of cytokines IL-2 and IL-4 in splenic cells with and without exposure to HTS quantified by qRT-PCR (A) and ELISA (B). The data are represented as the mean ± SD of the mean of each group of six samples. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001).
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 2192-2200https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2407.07040

Fig 4.

Figure 4.HTS regulates the expression of signaling pathways related to MAPKs (A), autophagy (B) and transcription factor NF-ĸB in splenic cells (C). Total proteins were extracted from mouse spleens by RIPA lysis buffer. The protein samples were subjected to western blotting assay with β-actin used as reference protein.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 2192-2200https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2407.07040

Fig 5.

Figure 5.Protection against Brucella in BALB/c mice treated with HTS. BALB/c mice were intraperitoneally challenged with B. abortus, followed by daily oral treatment with HTS for 14 days. On the 14th day post-infection, spleen and liver samples were collected (A) The bacterial burden in spleen and liver were evaluated and calculated with a base- 10 logarithm of the number of CFU (B). At the same time, spleen and liver weights (C) were also measured. The data are represented as the mean ± SD of the mean of each group of six samples. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (*, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001).
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 2192-2200https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2407.07040

Table 1 . Primer sequences used for qRT-PCR..

GeneCommon nameForward primerReverse primer
Il2Interleukin 25’- CTGGGGAGTTTCAGGTTCCTG -3’5’- CTCGCATCCTGTGTCACATTG -3’
Il4Interleukin 45’- GTCATCCTGCTCTTCTTTCTC -3’5’- CACCTTGGAAGCCCTACAGAC -3’
Il1bInterleukin 1β5’- -CAACCACACAAGTGATATTC-3’5’- GGATCCACACTCTCCAGCTG-3’
Nos2Nitric oxide synthase 25’- GGAGGTGCTTGAAGAGTTCC -3’5’- AGGAGGTGATGGAGTAGTAGC -3’
b-actinβ-actin5’- CGCCACCAGTTCGCCATGGA-3’5’- TACAGCCCGGGGAGCATCGT-3’

Table 2 . Protection against B. abortus in mice treated with HTS..

TissuesTreatmentLog10 CFU of bacteria (Mean ± SD)Log protectionP-valuea
SpleenPBS4.18 ± 0.150.53P < 0.05
HTS3.65 ± 0.15
LiverPBS4.82 ± 0.170.59P < 0.05
HTS4.23 ± 0.26

aSignificantly different from PBS-treated mice were estimated by Student’s t-test..


References

  1. Occhialini A, Hofreuter D, Ufermann C-M, Al Dahouk S, Köhler S. 2022. The retrospective on atypical Brucella species leads to novel definitions. Microorganisms 10: 813.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  2. Laine CG, Johnson VE, Scott HM, Arenas-Gamboa AM. 2023. Global estimate of human brucellosis incidence. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 29: 1789.
    CrossRef
  3. Bosilkovski M, Keramat F, Arapović J. 2021. The current therapeutical strategies in human brucellosis. Infection 49: 823-832.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Carvalho TF, Haddad JPA, Paixao TA, Santos RL. 2016. Meta-analysis and advancement of brucellosis vaccinology. PLoS One 11: e0166582.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Mirzaei R, Sholeh M, Jalalifar S, Zafari E, Kazemi S, Rasouli-Saravani A, et al. 2021. Immunometabolism in human brucellosis: an emerging field of investigation. Microb. Pathog. 158: 105115.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Pfortmueller CA, Schefold JC. 2017. Hypertonic saline in critical illness-a systematic review. J. Crit. Care 42: 168-177.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Kølsen‐Petersen J. 2004. Immune effect of hypertonic saline: fact or fiction? Acta. Anaesthesiol. Scand. 48: 667-678.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Oliveira RP, Velasco I, Soriano FG, Friedman G. 2002. Clinical review: hypertonic saline resuscitation in sepsis. Crit. Care 6: 1-6.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Coimbra R, Hoyt DB, Junger WG, Angle N, Wolf P, Loomis W, et al. 1997. Hypertonic saline resuscitation decreases susceptibility to sepsis after hemorrhagic shock. J. Trauma. Acute. Care Surg. 42: 602-607.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Mitra S, Schiller D, Anderson C, Gamboni F, D'Alessandro A, Kelher M, et al. 2017. Hypertonic saline attenuates the cytokineinduced pro-inflammatory signature in primary human lung epithelia. PLoS. One 12: e0189536.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Coelho AMM, Jukemura J, Sampietre SN, Martins JO, Molan NA, Patzina RA, et al. 2010. Mechanisms of the beneficial effect of hypertonic saline solution in acute pancreatitis. Shock 34: 502-507.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Sposito F, Northey S, Charras A, McNamara PS, Hedrich CM. 2023. Hypertonic saline induces inflammation in human macrophages through the NLRP1 inflammasome. Genes. Immun. 24: 263-269.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Shields CJ, O'Sullivan AW, Wang JH, Winter DC, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP. 2003. Hypertonic saline enhances host response to bacterial challenge by augmenting receptor-independent neutrophil intracellular superoxide formation. Ann. Surg. 238: 249-257.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Chen L-W, Huang H-L, Lee I-T, Hsu C-M, Lu P-J. 2006. Hypertonic saline enhances host defense to bacterial challenge by augmenting toll-like receptors. Crit. Care. Med. 34: 1758-1768.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Zhang W-C, Du L-J, Zheng X-J, Chen X-Q, Shi C, Chen B-Y, et al. 2018. Elevated sodium chloride drives type I interferon signaling in macrophages and increases antiviral resistance. J. Biol. Chem. 293: 1030-1039.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. Michon A-L, Jumas-Bilak E, Chiron R, Lamy B, Marchandin H. 2014. Advances toward the elucidation of hypertonic saline effects on Pseudomonas aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis patients. PLoS One 9: e90164.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. Degos C, Gagnaire A, Banchereau R, Moriyón I, Gorvel J-P. 2015. Brucella CβG induces a dual pro-and anti-inflammatory response leading to a transient neutrophil recruitment. Virulence 6: 19-28.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Akbulut HH, Kilic SS, Bulut V, Ozden M. 2005. Determination of intracellular cytokines produced by Th1 and Th2 cells using flow cytometry in patients with brucellosis. FEMS. Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 45: 253-258.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Elfaki MG, Alaidan AA, Al-Hokail AA. 2015. Host response to Brucella infection: review and future perspective. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries 9: 697-701.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Lopez-Santiago R, Sanchez-Argaez AB, De Alba-Nunez LG, Baltierra-Uribe SL, Moreno-Lafont MC. 2019. Immune response to mucosal Brucella infection. Front. Immunol. 10: 1759.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  21. Rossetti CA, Drake KL, Siddavatam P, Lawhon SD, Nunes JE, Gull T, et al. 2013. Systems biology analysis of Brucella infected Peyer's patch reveals rapid invasion with modest transient perturbations of the host transcriptome. PLoS One 8: e81719.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Dorneles EM, Teixeira-Carvalho A, Araújo MS, Sriranganathan N, Lage AP. 2015. Immune response triggered by Brucella abortus following infection or vaccination. Vaccine 33: 3659-3666.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Martirosyan A, Moreno E, Gorvel JP. 2011. An evolutionary strategy for a stealthy intracellular Brucella pathogen. Immunol. Rev. 240: 211-234.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Priyanka, Shringi BN, Choudhary OP, Kashyap SK. 2021. Cytokines in brucellosis: biological rhythm at the interface of innate and adaptive immunity. Biol. Rhythm. Res. 52: 1031-1043.
    CrossRef
  25. Baldwin CL, Goenka R. 2006. Host immune responses to the intracellular bacteria Brucella: does the bacteria instruct the host to facilitate chronic infection? Crit. Rev. Immunol. 26: 407-442.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Hop HT, Reyes AW, Huy TX, Arayan LT, Min W, Lee HJ, et al. 2017. Activation of NF-ĸB-mediated TNF-induced antimicrobial immunity is required for the efficient Brucella abortus clearance in RAW 264.7 cells. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 7: 437.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  27. Hop HT, Huy TXN, Reyes AWB, Arayan LT, Vu SH, Min W, et al. 2019. Interleukin 6 promotes Brucella abortus clearance by controlling bactericidal activity of macrophages and CD8+ T cell differentiation. Infect. Immun. 87: 10.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  28. Hiz P, Kanbur E, Demir N, Akalin H, Cagan E, Pashazadeh M, et al. 2020. Roles of novel IL-1 family (IL-36, IL-37, and IL-38) members in chronic brucellosis. Cytokine 135: 155211.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Ip WE, Medzhitov R. 2015. Macrophages monitor tissue osmolarity and induce inflammatory response through NLRP3 and NLRC4 inflammasome activation. Nat. Commun. 6: 6931.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Sakata F, Ito Y, Mizuno M, Sawai A, Suzuki Y, Tomita T, et al. 2017. Sodium chloride promotes tissue inflammation via osmotic stimuli in subtotal-nephrectomized mice. Lab. Invest. 97: 432-446.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Oreopoulos GD, Bradwell S, Lu Z, Fan J, Khadaroo R, Marshall JC, et al. 2001. Synergistic induction of IL-10 by hypertonic saline solution and lipopolysaccharides in murine peritoneal macrophages. Surgery 130: 157-165.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Xavier MN, Winter MG, Spees AM, Nguyen K, Atluri VL, Silva TM, et al. 2013. CD4+ T cell-derived IL-10 promotes Brucella abortus persistence via modulation of macrophage function. PLoS Pathog. 9: e1003454.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Jantsch J, Schatz V, Friedrich D, Schröder A, Kopp C, Siegert I, et al. 2015. Cutaneous Na+ storage strengthens the antimicrobial barrier function of the skin and boosts macrophage-driven host defense. Cell. Metab. 21: 493-501.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Martirosyan A, Gorvel J-P. 2013. Brucella evasion of adaptive immunity. Future. Microbiol. 8: 147-154.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Golding B, Scott DE, Scharf O, Huang L-Y, Zaitseva M, Lapham C, et al. 2001. Immunity and protection against Brucella abortus. Microbes. Infect. 3: 43-48.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Barrionuevo P, Delpino MV, Pozner RG, Velásquez LN, Cassataro J, Giambartolomei GH. 2013. Brucella abortus induces intracellular retention of MHC‐I molecules in human macrophages down‐modulating cytotoxic CD8+ T cell responses. Cell. Microbiol. 15: 487-502.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  37. Guimarães G, Gomes MTR, Campos PC, Marinho FV, de Assis NR, Silveira TN, et al. 2018. Immunoproteasome subunits are required for CD8+ T cell function and host resistance to Brucella abortus infection in mice. Infect. Immun. 86: e00615-17.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  38. Starr T, Child R, Wehrly TD, Hansen B, Hwang S, López-Otin C, et al. 2012. Selective subversion of autophagy complexes facilitates completion of the Brucella intracellular cycle. Cell. Host. Microbe. 11: 33-45.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  39. Guo F, Li Z, Chen C, Wang Y, Zhang H, Wang P, et al. 2011. Role of autophagy in inhibition of Brucella-containing vacuole-lysosome fusion in murine macrophages. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 5: 3778-3783.
    CrossRef
  40. McCarthy CG, Chakraborty S, Singh G, San Yeoh B, Schreckenberger ZJ, Singh A, et al. 2021. Ketone body β-hydroxybutyrate is an autophagy-dependent vasodilator. JCI. Insight 6: e149037.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  41. Forte M, Bianchi F, Cotugno M, Marchitti S, De Falco E, Raffa S, et al. 2020. Pharmacological restoration of autophagy reduces hypertension-related stroke occurrence. Autophagy 16: 1468-1481.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  42. Corcelle E, Djerbi N, Mari M, Nebout M, Fiorini C, Fénichel P, et al. 2007. Control of the autophagy maturation step by the MAPK ERK and p38: lessons from environmental carcinogens. Autophagy 3: 57-59.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  43. Kim K-Y, Park K-I, Kim S-H, Yu S-N, Park S-G, Kim YW, et al. 2017. Inhibition of autophagy promotes salinomycin-induced apoptosis via reactive oxygen species-mediated PI3K/AKT/mTOR and ERK/p38 MAPK-dependent signaling in human prostate cancer cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18: 1088.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  44. Deree J, Melbostad H, Loomis WH, Putnam JG, Coimbra R. 2007. The effects of a novel resuscitation strategy combining pentoxifylline and hypertonic saline on neutrophil MAPK signaling. Surgery 142: 276-283.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  45. Cervantes-Flores M, Martínez-Romero A, Ramírez-Valles EG, Mendiola LS, Moreno-Lafont MC, López-Moreno R, et al. 2011. NFκB is differentially activated in macrophages from J774A.1 cell line infected with vaccine or virulent strains of Brucella abortus. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 5: 4227-4231.
    CrossRef
  46. Zhao T, Zhang Z, Li Y, Sun Z, Liu L, Deng X, et al. 2023. Brucella abortus modulates macrophage polarization and inflammatory response by targeting glutaminases through the NF-κB signaling pathway. Front. Immunol. 14: 1180837.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  47. Caamano J, Hunter CA. 2002. NF-κB family of transcription factors: central regulators of innate and adaptive immune functions. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15: 414-429.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  48. Zhang D, Wang C, Cao S, Ye Z, Deng B, Kijlstra A, et al. 2015. High-salt enhances the inflammatory response by retina pigment epithelium cells following lipopolysaccharide stimulation. Mediators. Inflamm. 2015: 197512.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef