전체메뉴
검색
Article Search

JMB Journal of Microbiolog and Biotechnology

QR Code QR Code

Review


References

  1. Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, et al. IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers, Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
  2. Lindsey R, Dahlman L. 2023. Climate Change: Global Temperature. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
  3. Lindsey R. 2022. Climate Change: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
  4. Hoegh-Guldberg O, Jacob D, Taylor M, Bindi M, Brown S, Camilloni I, et al. 2018. Impacts of 1.5°C Global Warming on Natural and Human Systems. IPCC Special Report.
  5. Larcombe AN, Papini MG, Chivers EK, Berry LJ, Lucas RM, Wyrwoll CS. 2021. Mouse lung structure and function after long-term exposure to an atmospheric carbon dioxide level predicted by climate change modeling. Environ. Health Perspect. 129: 17001.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  6. McLean MJ, Mouillot D, Goascoz N, Schlaich I, Auber A. 2019. Functional reorganization of marine fish nurseries under climate warming. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25: 660-674.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Tabari H. 2020. Climate change impact on flood and extreme precipitation increases with water availability. Sci. Rep. 10: 13768.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  8. Vats G, Mathur R. 2022. A net-zero emissions energy system in India by 2050: An exploration. J. Clean. Prod. 352: 131417.
    CrossRef
  9. Chu S. 2009. Carbon capture and sequestration. Science 325: 1599.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Zhang Y, Yu L, Cui K, Wang H, Fu T. 2023. Carbon capture and storage technology by steel-making slags: recent progress and future challenges. Chem. Eng. J. 455: 140552.
    CrossRef
  11. Vercelli S, Anderlucci J, Memoli R, Battisti N, Mabon L, Lombardi S. 2013. Informing people about CCS: a review of social research studies. Energy Procedia 37: 7464-7473.
    CrossRef
  12. Al-Mamoori A, Krishnamurthy A, Rownaghi AA, Rezaei F. 2017. Carbon capture and utilization update. Energy Technol. 5: 834-849.
    CrossRef
  13. Derrick JS, Loipersberger M, Chatterjee R, Iovan DA, Smith PT, Chakarawet K, et al. 2020. Metal-ligand cooperativity via exchange coupling promotes iron-catalyzed electrochemical CO2 reduction at low overpotentials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142: 20489-20501.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Zhang X, Guo SX, Gandionco KA, Bond AM, Zhang J. 2020. Electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction: from fundamental principles to catalyst design. Mater. Today Adv. 7: 10074.
    CrossRef
  15. Sahoo A, Chowdhury AH, Manirul Islam S, Bala T. 2022. Successful CO2 reduction under visible light photocatalysis using porous NiO nanoparticles, an atypical metal oxide. New J. Chem. 46: 10806-10813.
    CrossRef
  16. D'Amario B, Perez C, Grelaud M, Pitta P, Krasakopoulou E, Ziveri P. 2020. Coccolithophore community response to ocean acidification and warming in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea: results from a mesocosm experiment. Sci. Rep. 10: 12637.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  17. Stitt M, Lunn J, Usadel B. 2010. Arabidopsis and primary photosynthetic metabolism - more than the icing on the cake. Plant J. 61: 1067-1091.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Ragsdale SW, Pierce E. 2008. Acetogenesis and the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway of CO2 fixation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1784: 1873-1898.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  19. Claassens NJ, Bordanaba-Florit G, Cotton CAR, De Maria A, Finger-Bou M, Friedeheim L, et al. 2020. Replacing the Calvin cycle with the reductive glycine pathway in Cupriavidus necator. Metab. Eng. 62: 30-41.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Modde K, Timm S, Florian A, Michl K, Fernie AR, Bauwe H. 2017. High serine:glyoxylate aminotransferase activity lowers leaf daytime serine levels, inducing the phosphoserine pathway in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 68: 643-656.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  21. Xu Y, Ren J, Wang W, Zeng AP. 2022. Improvement of glycine biosynthesis from one-carbon compounds and ammonia catalyzed by the glycine cleavage system in vitro. Eng. Life Sci. 22: 40-53.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  22. Gonzalez de la Cruz J, Machens F, Messerschmidt K, Bar-Even A. 2019. Core catalysis of the reductive glycine pathway demonstrated in yeast. ACS Synth. Biol. 8: 911-917.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  23. Hong Y, Arbter P, Wang W, Rojas LN, Zeng AP. 2021. Introduction of glycine synthase enables uptake of exogenous formate and strongly impacts the metabolism in Clostridium pasteurianum. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 118: 1366-1380.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Sanchez-Andrea I, Guedes IA, Hornung B, Boeren S, Lawson CE, Sousa DZ, et al. 2020. The reductive glycine pathway allows autotrophic growth of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Nat. Commun. 11: 5090.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  25. Zarzycki J, Brecht V, Muller M, Fuchs G. 2009. Identifying the missing steps of the autotrophic 3-hydroxypropionate CO2 fixation cycle in Chloroflexus aurantiacus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 21317-21322.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  26. Huber H, Gallenberger M, Jahn U, Eylert E, Berg IA, Kockelkorn D, et al. 2008. A dicarboxylate/4-hydroxybutyrate autotrophic carbon assimilation cycle in the hyperthermophilic Archaeum Ignicoccus hospitalis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 7851-7856.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  27. Hawkins AS, Han Y, Bennett RK, Adams MW, Kelly RM. 2013. Role of 4-hydroxybutyrate-CoA synthetase in the CO2 fixation cycle in thermoacidophilic archaea. J. Biol. Chem. 288: 4012-4022.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  28. Loder AJ, Han Y, Hawkins AB, Lian H, Lipscomb GL, Schut GJ, et al. 2016. Reaction kinetic analysis of the 3-hydroxypropionate/4-hydroxybutyrate CO2 fixation cycle in extremely thermoacidophilic archaea. Metab. Eng. 38: 446-463.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  29. Steffens L, Pettinato E, Steiner TM, Mall A, Konig S, Eisenreich W, et al. 2021. High CO2 levels drive the TCA cycle backwards towards autotrophy. Nature 592: 784-788.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  30. Cheng HT, Lo SC, Huang CC, Ho TY, Yang YT. 2019. Detailed profiling of carbon fixation of in silico synthetic autotrophy with reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle and Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle in Esherichia coli using hydrogen as an energy source. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 4: 165-172.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  31. Bar-Even A, Noor E, Lewis NE, Milo R. 2010. Design and analysis of synthetic carbon fixation pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 8889-8894.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  32. Kerfeld CA. 2016. Rewiring Escherichia coli for carbon-dioxide fixation. Nat. Biotechnol. 34: 1035-1036.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Antonovsky N, Gleizer S, Noor E, Zohar Y, Herz E, Barenholz U, et al. 2016. Sugar synthesis from CO2 in Escherichia coli. Cell 166: 115-125.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  34. Gleizer S, Ben-Nissan R, Bar-On YM, Antonovsky N, Noor E, Zohar Y, et al. 2019. Conversion of Escherichia coli to generate all biomass carbon from CO2. Cell 179: 1255-1263.e1212.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  35. Lee SY, Kim YS, Shin W-R, Yu J, Lee J, Lee S, et al. 2020. Non-photosynthetic CO2 bio-mitigation by Escherichia coli harbouring CBB genes. Green Chem. 22: 6889-6896.
    CrossRef
  36. Flamholz AI, Dugan E, Blikstad C, Gleizer S, Ben-Nissan R, Amram S, et al. 2020. Functional reconstitution of a bacterial CO2 concentrating mechanism in Escherichia coli. Elife 9: 59882.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  37. Woolston BM, King JR, Reiter M, Van Hove B, Stephanopoulos G. 2018. Improving formaldehyde consumption drives methanol assimilation in engineered E. coli. Nat. Commun. 9: 2387.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  38. He H, Edlich-Muth C, Lindner SN, Bar-Even A. 2018. Ribulose monophosphate shunt provides nearly all biomass and energy required for growth of E. coli. ACS Synth. Biol. 7: 1601-1611.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Keller P, Noor E, Meyer F, Reiter MA, Anastassov S, Kiefer P, et al. 2020. Methanol-dependent Escherichia coli strains with a complete ribulose monophosphate cycle. Nat. Commun. 11: 5403.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  40. Kim S, Lindner SN, Aslan S, Yishai O, Wenk S, Schann K, et al. 2020. Growth of E. coli on formate and methanol via the reductive glycine pathway. Nat. Chem. Biol. 16: 538-545.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Yu H, Liao JC. 2018. A modified serine cycle in Escherichia coli coverts methanol and CO2 to two-carbon compounds. Nat. Commun. 9: 3992.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  42. He H, Hoper R, Dodenhoft M, Marliere P, Bar-Even A. 2020. An optimized methanol assimilation pathway relying on promiscuous formaldehyde-condensing aldolases in E. coli. Metab. Eng. 60: 1-13.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  43. Jo BH, Kim IG, Seo JH, Kang DG, Cha HJ. 2013. Engineered Escherichia coli with periplasmic carbonic anhydrase as a biocatalyst for CO2 sequestration. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79: 6697-6705.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  44. Kato A, Takatani N, Ikeda K, Maeda SI, Omata T. 2017. Removal of the product from the culture medium strongly enhances free fatty acid production by genetically engineered Synechococcus elongatus. Biotechnol. Biofuels 10: 141.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  45. Yunus IS, Wichmann J, Wordenweber R, Lauersen KJ, Kruse O, Jones PR. 2018. Synthetic metabolic pathways for photobiological conversion of CO2 into hydrocarbon fuel. Metab. Eng. 49: 201-211.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  46. Yunus IS, Jones PR. 2018. Photosynthesis-dependent biosynthesis of medium chain-length fatty acids and alcohols. Metab. Eng. 49: 59-68.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  47. Choe H, Joo JC, Cho DH, Kim MH, Lee SH, Jung KD, et al. 2014. Efficient CO2-reducing activity of NAD-dependent formate dehydrogenase from Thiobacillus sp. KNK65MA for formate production from CO2 gas. PLoS One 9: e103111.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  48. Aslan AS, Valjakka J, Ruupunen J, Yildirim D, Turner NJ, Turunen O, et al. 2017. Chaetomium thermophilum formate dehydrogenase has high activity in the reduction of hydrogen carbonate (HCO3-) to formate. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 30: 47-55.
  49. Boldt A, Ansorge‐Schumacher MB. 2020. Formate dehydrogenase from Rhodococcus jostii (RjFDH) - A high‐performance tool for NADH regeneration. Adv. Synth. Catal. 362: 4109-4118.
    CrossRef
  50. Singh RK, Singh R, Sivakumar D, Kondaveeti S, Kim T, Li J, et al. 2018. Insights into cell-free conversion of CO2 to chemicals by a multienzyme cascade reaction. ACS Catal. 8: 11085-11093.
    CrossRef
  51. Kuk SK, Gopinath K, Singh RK, Kim TD, Lee Y, Choi WS, et al. 2019. NADH-free electroenzymatic reduction of CO2 by conductive hydrogel-conjugated formate dehydrogenase. ACS Catal. 9: 5584-5589.
    CrossRef
  52. Seelajaroen H, Bakandritsos A, Otyepka M, Zboril R, Sariciftci NS. 2020. Immobilized enzymes on graphene as nanobiocatalyst. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12: 250-259.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  53. Sharma T, Kumar A. 2021. Efficient reduction of CO2 using a novel carbonic anhydrase producing Corynebacterium flavescens. Environ. Eng. Res. 26: 200191.
    CrossRef
  54. Kanao T, Kawamura M, Fukui T, Atomi H, Imanaka T. 2002. Characterization of isocitrate dehydrogenase from the green sulfur bacterium Chlorobium limicola. A carbon dioxide-fixing enzyme in the reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle. Eur. J. Biochem. 269: 1926-1931.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  55. Katsyv A, Schoelmerich MC, Basen M, Muller V. 2021. The pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase of the thermophilic acetogen, Thermoanaerobacter kivui. FEBS Open Bio 11: 1332-1342.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  56. Gibson MI, Brignole EJ, Pierce E, Can M, Ragsdale SW, Drennan CL. 2015. The structure of an oxalate oxidoreductase provides insight into microbial 2-oxoacid metabolism. Biochemistry 54: 4112-4120.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  57. Chen PY, Li B, Drennan CL, Elliott SJ. 2019. A reverse TCA cycle 2-oxoacid:ferredoxin oxidoreductase that makes C-C bonds from CO2. Joule 3: 595-611.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  58. Li B, Steindel P, Haddad N, Elliott SJ. 2021. Maximizing (Electro)catalytic CO2 reduction with a ferredoxin-based reduction potential gradient. ACS Catal. 11: 4009-4023.
    CrossRef
  59. Li B, Elliott SJ. 2016. The Catalytic Bias of 2-Oxoacid:ferredoxin Oxidoreductase in CO2: evolution and reduction through a ferredoxin-mediated electrocatalytic assay. Electrochim. Acta 199: 349-356.
    CrossRef
  60. Wayama F, Hatsugai N, Okumura Y. 2022. Bipyridines mediate electron transfer from an electrode to nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate. PLoS One 17: e0269693.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  61. Striepe L, Baumgartner T. 2017. Viologens and their application as functional materials. Chem. Eur. J. 23: 16924-16940.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  62. Bar-Even A, Flamholz A, Noor E, Milo R. 2012. Thermodynamic constraints shape the structure of carbon fixation pathways. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1817: 1646-1659.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  63. El-Zahab B, Donnelly D, Wang P. 2008. Particle-tethered NADH for production of methanol from CO2 catalyzed by coimmobilized enzymes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 99: 508-514.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  64. Ren S, Wang Z, Bilal M, Feng Y, Jiang Y, Jia S, et al. 2020. Co-immobilization multienzyme nanoreactor with co-factor regeneration for conversion of CO2. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 155: 110-118.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  65. Ji X, Su Z, Wang P, Ma G, Zhang S. 2015. Tethering of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide inside hollow nanofibers for high-yield synthesis of methanol from carbon dioxide catalyzed by coencapsulated multienzymes. ACS Nano. 9: 4600-4610.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  66. Marpani F, Sarossy Z, Pinelo M, Meyer AS. 2017. Kinetics based reaction optimization of enzyme catalyzed reduction of formaldehyde to methanol with synchronous cofactor regeneration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 114: 2762-2770.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  67. Cazelles R, Drone J, Fajula F, Ersen O, Moldovan S, Galarneau A. 2013. Reduction of CO2 to methanol by a polyenzymatic system encapsulated in phospholipids-silica nanocapsules. New J. Chem. 37: 3721-3730.
    CrossRef
  68. Song H, Ma C, Liu P, You C, Lin J, Zhu Z. 2019. A hybrid CO2 electroreduction system mediated by enzyme-cofactor conjugates coupled with Cu nanoparticle-catalyzed cofactor regeneration. J. CO2 Util. 34: 568-575.
    CrossRef
  69. Lee SY, Lim SY, Seo D, Lee J-Y, Chung TD. 2016. Light-driven highly selective conversion of CO2 to formate by electrosynthesized enzyme/cofactor thin film electrode. Adv. Energy Mater. 6: 1502207.
    CrossRef
  70. Yuan M, Sahin S, Cai R, Abdellaoui S, Hickey DP, Minteer SD, et al. 2018. Creating a low-potential redox polymer for efficient electroenzymatic CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57: 6582-6586.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  71. Reda T, Plugge CM, Abram NJ, Hirst J. 2008. Reversible interconversion of carbon dioxide and formate by an electroactive enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 10654-10658.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  72. Cai R, Milton RD, Abdellaoui S, Park T, Patel J, Alkotaini B, et al. 2018. Electroenzymatic C-C Bond Formation from CO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140: 5041-5044.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  73. Zhang L, Can M, Ragsdale SW, Armstrong FA. 2018. Fast and selective photoreduction of CO2 to CO catalyzed by a complex of carbon monoxide dehydrogenase, TiO2, and Ag nanoclusters. ACS Catal. 8: 2789-2795.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  74. Kim S, Giraldo N, Rainaldi V, Machens F, Collas F, Kubis A, et al. 2023. Optimizing E. coli as a formatotrophic platform for bioproduction via the reductive glycine pathway. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11: 1091899.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  75. Davies KJ, Doroshow JH. 1986. Redox cycling of anthracyclines by cardiac mitochondria. I. Anthracycline radical formation by NADH dehydrogenase. J. Biol. Chem. 261: 3060-3067.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  76. Dutton PL, Moser CC, Sled VD, Daldal F, Ohnishi T. 1998. A reductant-induced oxidation mechanism for complex I. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 1364: 245-257.
    CrossRef
  77. Kay CJ, Barber MJ, Notton BA, Solomonson LP. 1989. Oxidation--reduction midpoint potentials of the flavin, haem and Mo-pterin centres in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) nitrate reductase. Biochem. J. 263: 285-287.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  78. Giastas P, Pinotsis N, Efthymiou G, Wilmanns M, Kyritsis P, Moulis J-M, et al. 2006. The structure of the 2[4Fe-4S] ferredoxin from Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 1.32-Å resolution: comparison with other high-resolution structures of ferredoxins and contributing structural features to reduction potential values. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 11: 445-458.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  79. Schipke CG, Goodin DB, McRee DE, Stout CD. 1999. Oxidized and reduced Azotobacter vinelandii ferredoxin I at 1.4 A resolution: conformational change of surface residues without significant change in the [3Fe-4S]+/0 cluster. Biochemistry 38: 8228-8239.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  80. Yoch DC, Valentine RC. 1972. Four-iron (sulfide) ferredoxin from Bacillus polymyxa. J. Bacteriol. 110: 1211-1213.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  81. Giastas P, Pinotsis N, Efthymiou G, Wilmanns M, Kyritsis P, Moulis JM, et al. 2006. The structure of the 2[4Fe-4S] ferredoxin from Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 1.32-A resolution: comparison with other high-resolution structures of ferredoxins and contributing structural features to reduction potential values. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 11: 445-458.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  82. Yoon KS, Bobst C, Hemann CF, Hille R, Tabita FR. 2001. Spectroscopic and functional properties of novel 2[4Fe-4S] clustercontaining ferredoxins from the green sulfur bacterium Chlorobium tepidum. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 44027-44036.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  83. Kyritsis P, Hatzfeld OM, Link TA, Moulis JM. 1998. The two [4Fe-4S] clusters in Chromatium vinosum ferredoxin have largely different reduction potentials. Structural origin and functional consequences. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 15404-15411.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  84. Saridakis E, Giastas P, Efthymiou G, Thoma V, Moulis JM, Kyritsis P, et al. 2009. Insight into the protein and solvent contributions to the reduction potentials of [4Fe-4S]2+/+ clusters: crystal structures of the Allochromatium vinosum ferredoxin variants C57A and V13G and the homologous Escherichia coli ferredoxin. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 14: 783-799.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  85. Bender G, Ragsdale SW. 2011. Evidence that ferredoxin interfaces with an internal redox shuttle in Acetyl-CoA synthase during reductive activation and catalysis. Biochemistry 50: 276-286.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  86. Breton JL, Duff JL, Butt JN, Armstrong FA, George SJ, Petillot Y, et al. 1995. Identification of the iron-sulfur clusters in a ferredoxin from the archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. Evidence for a reduced [3Fe-4S] cluster with pH-dependent electronic properties. Eur. J. Biochem. 233: 937-946.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  87. Boll M, Fuchs G, Tilley G, Armstrong FA, Lowe DJ. 2000. Unusual spectroscopic and electrochemical properties of the 2[4Fe-4S] ferredoxin of Thauera aromatica. Biochemistry 39: 4929-4938.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  88. Abdul Wahab R, Wayama F, Hatsugai N, Okumura Y. 2022. Bipyridines mediate electron transfer from an electrode to nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate. PLoS One 17: e0269693.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef

Related articles in JMB

More Related Articles

Article

Review

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023; 33(11): 1403-1411

Published online November 28, 2023 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2306.06005

Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Insights into Enzyme Reactions with Redox Cofactors in Biological Conversion of CO2

Du-Kyeong Kang1,2, Seung-Hwa Kim1,2, Jung-Hoon Sohn1,2, and Bong Hyun Sung1,2*

1Synthetic Biology Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
2Department of Biosystems and Bioengineering, Korea University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to:Bong Hyun Sung,       bhsung@kribb.re.kr

Received: June 5, 2023; Revised: June 12, 2023; Accepted: June 12, 2023

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the most abundant component of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and directly creates environmental issues such as global warming and climate change. Carbon capture and storage have been proposed mainly to solve the problem of increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere; however, more emphasis has recently been placed on its use. Among the many methods of using CO2, one of the key environmentally friendly technologies involves biologically converting CO2 into other organic substances such as biofuels, chemicals, and biomass via various metabolic pathways. Although an efficient biocatalyst for industrial applications has not yet been developed, biological CO2 conversion is the needed direction. To this end, this review briefly summarizes seven known natural CO2 fixation pathways according to carbon number and describes recent studies in which natural CO2 assimilation systems have been applied to heterogeneous in vivo and in vitro systems. In addition, studies on the production of methanol through the reduction of CO2 are introduced. The importance of redox cofactors, which are often overlooked in the CO2 assimilation reaction by enzymes, is presented; methods for their recycling are proposed. Although more research is needed, biological CO2 conversion will play an important role in reducing GHG emissions and producing useful substances in terms of resource cycling.

Keywords: CO2 assimilation, CO2-fixation pathway, C1 reduction, redox cofactor, synthetic biology

Introduction

Net-zero carbon emission is a worldwide task owing to the rapidly increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) levels in the atmosphere. Among the human-made GHGs, C1 molecules, especially carbon dioxide (CO2), are receiving considerable attention as they account for almost 70% of the GHGs that are contributing to the rapidly intensifying global warming and climate change [1]. The CO2 concentration in the atmosphere has markedly increased since the Industrial Revolution and is now almost 50% higher than preindustrial levels, at 412 parts per million (ppm) on average. Global surface temperatures have increased, in correlation with atmospheric concentrations of CO2, by nearly 1°C compared to preindustrial levels [2, 3]. This increase of 1°C has caused a number of distinct changes, including higher temperatures on land and in the oceans, glacier melting, and increased frequency and severity of precipitation or drought. Furthermore, many experts have predicted that these changes will become more severe with a global warming of 1.5°C over preindustrial levels and that the damages will be difficult to reverse at 2°C of global warming [4]. In addition to climate change, rising atmospheric concentrations of GHGs have the potential to threaten ecosystems and eventually affect humans adversely [5-7]. Therefore, to maintain global temperatures below 1.5°C, efforts to achieve a phased goal of reducing carbon emissions by 45% from 2005 to 2030 and eventually reaching net-zero carbon emissions by 2050 are desperately needed [8]. Solving the problem of the CO2 in the atmosphere is not only an environmental issue but also provides the opportunity to use a substrate on which the carbon skeleton of profitable materials, such as fuels and various chemicals, can be built. Therefore, more attention is now being paid to CO2 sequestration with reference to carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) than to carbon capture and storage (CCS). Carbon storage technology involves capturing the carbon in the atmosphere and transporting carbon gases underground, typically using geological space as a carbon storage reservoir. Studies on CCS technology using industrial solid waste and steel-making slags, as carbon storage, are ongoing [9-11]. CCUS technology involves carbon capture and utilization to generate value-added products through subsequent reactions [12]. Biological CO2 reduction or assimilation, which will be introduced in this paper, is included in the CCUS in terms of generating biomass and valuable materials.

Studies on the mitigation and use of CO2 are being conducted in various applications such as metal- and nanomaterials-fused electrochemical catalysis, photocatalysis, and biological catalysis [13-15]. Among these, biological CO2 conversion is an environmentally friendly and highly substrate-specific and reusable method that recycles CO2 substrates into value-added products. Ecosystems can efficiently reduce CO2 emissions through biological CO2 assimilation, which can be performed by plants and microorganisms. However, the large amounts of CO2 gases emitted by human activities have already exceeded the assimilation capacity of the natural ecosystem, causing excessive global warming [16]. To increase the carbon fixation efficiency beyond that of natural cycles, novel biotechnologies, such as synthetic biology, need to be incorporated into natural biological carbon reduction systems. Therefore, biomimetic strategies such as rebuilding paths by introducing partial heterologous carbon fixation pathways into in vivo and in vitro models may be crucial in solving the carbon fixation problem. In this review, we briefly provide an overview of the natural CO2 fixation pathways with enzymes and cofactors and introduce the application of biological CO2 assimilation studies. In addition, we discuss the cofactors called redox partners, which are essential components that play important roles in regulating C1 fixation. Our aim with this review was to provide a better understanding of the overall biological CO2 fixation pathways in nature, including not only C1-converting enzymes but also their important redox cofactors in CO2 reduction, and to represent novel possibilities for biological C1 fixation.

CO2 Fixation Pathways in Nature

To date, seven carbon fixation pathways have been identified in nature. Each pathway can assimilate different types of C1, such as gaseous CO2 and bicarbonate (HCO3-). The Calvin–Benson–Basham (CBB), Wood–Ljungdahl pathway (WLP), reductive glycine pathway (rGlyP), and reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle (rTCA) can fix gaseous CO2, whereas 3-hydroxypropionate (3-HP) bicycle and 3-hydroxypropionate/4-hydroxybutyrate (3-HP/4-HB) can fix bicarbonate. Both forms of carbon can be assimilated in the dicarboxylate/4-hydroxybutyrate (DC/4-HB) cycle. All pathways except the CBB cycle involve acetyl-CoA. A comprehensive representation of all natural CO2 fixation pathways is depicted in Fig. 1 based on the carbon number. The carbon-fixing enzymes and cofactors are listed in Table 1, along with their carbon-assimilating reaction and simplified change in carbon number.

Table 1 . Natural CO2 assimilation pathways..

Name of pathwayEnzymes (EC Number)CO2 fixation reactionSimplified reactionCofactor requirementsRef
Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle (CBB)Rubisco
(4.1.1.39)
Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate + CO2 → 3-Phospho glycerateC5 + C1 → 2C3-[17]
Wood-Ljungdahl pathway (WLP)Formate dehydrogenase
(1.17.1.9)
CO2 + NADPH → FormateC1 → C1NADPH[18]
Carbon monoxide dehydrogeanse
(1.2.7.4)
CO2 + Fdred → COC1 → C1reduced Fd
reductive glycine pathway (rGlyP)/
Glycine cleavage/
synthase system (GCS)
Aminomethyltransferase
(2.1.2.10)
5,10-methylene-THF + NH3 + CO2 + NADH → Glycine + THF + NAD+One carbon unit + C1 → C2NADH[74]
Glycine dehydrogenase
(1.4.4.2)
Dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase
(1.8.1.4)
3-Hydroxypropionate bicycle (3HP)Acetyl-CoA carboxylase
(6.4.1.2)
Acetyl-CoA + HCO3-+ ATP → Malonyl-CoA + ADPC2-CoA + C1 → C3-CoAATP[25]
Propionyl-CoA carboxylase
(6.4.1.3)
Propionyl-CoA + HCO3-+ ATP → (s)-Methylmalonyl-CoA + ADPC3-CoA + C1 → C4-CoAATP
3-Hydroxypropionate/ 4-Hydroxybutyrate cycle (3HP/4HB)Acetyl-CoA carboxylase
(6.4.1.2)
Acetyl-CoA + HCO3-+ ATP → Malonyl-CoA + ADPC2-CoA + C1 → C3-CoAATP[28]
Propionyl-CoA carboxylase
(6.4.1.3)
Propionyl-CoA + HCO3-+ ATP → (s)-Methylmalonyl-CoA + ADPC3-CoA + C1 → C4-CoAATP
Dicarboxylate/4-Hydroxybutyrate cycle (DC/4HB)Pyruvate synthase
(1.2.7.1)
Acetyl-CoA + CO2 + Fdred → Pyruvate + FdoxiC2-CoA + C1 → C3Reduced Fd[26]
Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase
(4.1.1.31)
Phosphoenolpyruvate + HCO3-→ OxaloacetateC3 + C1 → C4-
reverse Tricarboxylic acid cycle (rTCA)2-Oxoglutarate oxidoreductase
(1.2.7.3)
Succinyl-CoA + CO2 + Fdred → 2-Oxoglutarate + FdoxiC4 + C1 → C5Reduced Fd[29]
Isocitrate dehydrogenase
(6.4.1.7)
2-Oxoglutarate + CO2 + NAD(P)H → Isocitrate + NAD(P)+C5 + C1 → C6NAD(P)H


Figure 1. An overview illustration of major CO2 assimilation pathways in nature. (1) Calvin-Benson-Basham cycle; (2) Wood-ljungdahl pathway; (3) reductive glycine pathway; (4) 3-hydroxypropionate bicycle; (5) 3-hydroxypropionate/4-hydroxybutyrate cycle; (6) dicarboxylate/4-hydroxybutyrate cycle; and (7) reductive citric acid cycle. The 3-HP bicycle, 3-HP/ 4-HB cycle, and DC/4-HB cycle are represented by green, blue, and orange lines, respectively.

The CBB cycle, also known as the reductive pentose phosphate cycle, is the predominant carbon fixation pathway in plants and photosynthetic bacteria. In this cycle, CO2 and water are converted into organic compounds using cofactors such as light-driven ATP and NADPH [17]. The key enzyme used for CO2 fixation in the CBB cycle is ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO), which is categorized as a lyase. RuBisCO catalyzes the addition of CO2 to ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate (C5) and splits into two molecules of 3-phosphoglycerate (C3).

The WLP is one of the noncyclic pathways among the seven natural carbon fixation pathways and is also denoted as the reductive acetyl-CoA route. In this pathway, CO2 molecules are reduced into formate and carbon monoxide (CO) via formate dehydrogenase (FDH) and CO dehydrogenase in the initial stage, respectively. In this pathway, two molecules of CO2 are converted into one molecule of acetyl-CoA (C2) using cofactors such as NADPH, ATP, and reduced ferredoxin (Fdred) [18].

The rGlyP is a CO2 fixation metabolic pathway found in anaerobic bacteria, eukaryotes, and plants [19-21]. The initial reaction in this pathway starts with reducing CO2 to formate or directly reducing formate to 10-formyltetrahydrofolate (10-formyl-THF) [22]. The subsequent reactions of 10-formyl-THF produce 5,10-methylene-THF, which is used as a one-carbon unit for attaching additional CO2 to produce glycine. This process is catalyzed by a multienzyme complex called the glycine cleavage/synthase system (GCS), consisting of aminomethyltransferase, glycine dehydrogenase, and dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase [23]. To assimilate CO2 into 5,10-methylene-THF to generate glycine (C2), NADH and NH3 are required as cofactors [24].

The 3-HP bicycle was discovered in the thermophilic green nonsulfur bacteria, Chloroflexus aurantiacus, which obtains energy from light. In this cycle, two molecules of bicarbonate are fixed by acetyl-CoA carboxylase and propionyl-CoA carboxylase, and these enzymes generate C3 and C4 products, respectively, in the presence of ATP. The initial step of the 3-HP cycle is the conversion of acetyl-CoA (C2) to malonyl-CoA (C3) by acetyl-CoA carboxylase; after sequential steps, propionyl-CoA (C3) is converted into methylmalonyl-CoA (C4) by propionyl-CoA carboxylase [25]. In the last step of the 3-HP cycle, malyl-CoA, made from methylmalonyl-CoA, is split into acetyl-CoA and glyoxylate; (s)-citramalyl-CoA, which is formed through several steps after combining glyoxylate and propionyl-CoA, is divided into acetyl-CoA and pyruvate.

The 3-HP/4-HB cycle is a carbon fixation pathway that was discovered in Sulfolobales such as Metallosphaera and Thaumarchaeota [26,27]. The cycle starts with the conversion of acetyl-CoA (C2) into malonyl-CoA (C3) by incorporating bicarbonate; then, following sequential steps, propionyl-CoA (C3) is carboxylated to succinyl-CoA (C4) through methylmalonyl-CoA (C4) by incorporating additional bicarbonate. The key enzyme of inorganic carbon assimilation is acetyl-CoA/propionyl-CoA carboxylase, which generates two acetyl-CoA molecules from one acetyl-CoA, with 3-HP and 4-HB as key intermediates [28]. In this pathway, NADPH and ATP function as essential cofactors for the production of methylmalonyl-CoA from acetyl-CoA.

The DC/4-HB cycle was discovered in the anaerobic hyperthermophilic archaea, Ignicoccus species, which use CO2 with sulfur and hydrogen for their growth. CO2 is assimilated via acetyl-CoA to pyruvate using reduced ferredoxin (Fdred) by pyruvate synthase, and bicarbonate is transformed into phosphoenolpyruvate to oxaloacetate by phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase. The cofactors needed for C1 assimilation in this pathway include reduced Fd, ATP, and NAD(P)H [26].

The rTCA cycle is the reverse of the TCA cycle, so is also called the reverse TCA cycle. In this cycle, two molecules of CO2 are formed as C6 products from a C4 material through two steps. The first step involves catalysis by 2-oxoglutarate oxidoreductase, which produces 2-oxoglutarate (C5) from succinyl-CoA (C4) using one molecule of CO2 and the reducing energy from Fdred. In the second step, isocitrate dehydrogenase provides CO2 fixation into 2-oxoglutarate (C5) to generate isocitrate (C6) [29]. Cofactors such as NAD(P)H, ATP, Fdred, and FADH are used in rTCA cycle. In addition, the model in which isocitrate lyase is introduced has the shortest pathway to reduce two molecules of CO2 per cycle [30, 31]. The key elements of these CO2 fixation pathways are heterologously expressed and used in model microorganisms.

In Vivo Applications of Natural Biological CO2 Assimilation Systems

Many in vivo heterologous assimilation studies have been conducted to adapt metabolic pathways to use CO2. RuBisCO, which is involved in the CBB cycle, has been extensively studied to generate microorganisms with a non-native CBB cycle for CO2 fixation. Hence, diverse approaches have been considered for constructing CO2 assimilation bio-platforms using various techniques, such as genetic modification, strain evolution, and computational analyses of metabolic flux. For CO2 fixation, Escherichia coli was rewired to supply ATP and NADH from pyruvate through the TCA cycle as an energy module, fixing CO2 by RuBisCO as an assimilation module [32]. To strengthen the CO2 fixation ability of the strain that introduces RuBisCO and phosphoribulokinase, laboratory evolution and computational analyses were conducted, which resulted in an autotroph strain that has the ability to use CO2 for biomass under higher CO2 concentrations than the ancestral strain [33]. Similar to the two-module system study, autotrophic E. coli engineered with RuBisCO and FDH was constructed to convert CO2 to all-carbon biomass while regenerating cofactors such as NADH and ATP [34]. In addition to introducing only RuBisCO, researchers have reduced exogenous and endogenous CO2 by introducing the CBB operon from Rhodobacter sphaeroides and 20 heterologous genes related to CO2-concentrating mechanisms into E. coli [35, 36]. The ribulose-monophosphate (RuMP) pathway catalyzes the conversion of formaldehyde derived from CO2 or methane into biomass. Activating sedoheptulose bisphosphatase in RuMP pathway into E. coli led to three-fold-enhanced formaldehyde incorporation ability [37]. In addition, E. coli with a reconstructed metabolic pathway into which a RuMP shunt was introduced effectively converted methanol and sarcosine-derived formaldehyde into biomass [38]. RuMP-introduced methylotrophic E. coli was developed via flux balance analysis [39]. Furthermore, studies on converting C1 substances such as methanol, formate, and CO2 into various products via a modified serine cycle and rGlyP have also been conducted [40-42]. Carbonic anhydrase (CA), an enzyme that can directly convert CO2 to the ionic form of bicarbonate (HCO3-), was used to construct E. coli that could produce an industrially attractive material, calcium carbonate (CaCO3) [43].

Other bio-platforms for E. coli have also been studied for CO2 fixation. Cyanobacteria, which are representative photosynthetic marine bacteria, have been extensively studied for their ability to produce various biochemicals and biofuels while fixing CO2. RuBisCO in cyanobacteria was used as a CO2-fixing module and oleochemical-producing modules were added. A strain overexpressing the efflux pump and deficient aas gene coding for acyl-acyl carrier protein (acyl-ACP) demonstrated a high free fatty acid (FFA) content of 640 mg/l [44]. Another mutant introducing thioesterase A and fatty acid photodecarboxylase with acyl-ACP deficient Synechocystis sp. produced 111.2 mg/l of fatty alkanes [45]. In addition, Synechocystis sp., lacking the acyl-ACP synthetase gene (Δaas) and overexpressing the genes sfp and car encoding phosphopantetheinyl transferase and carboxylic acid reductase, respectively, produced over 905 mg/l of 1-octanol from CO2 [46].

In vitro Studies of Biological CO2 Assimilation

Various in vitro enzymatic CO2 reductions have been studied by investigating and exploring novel biocatalysts, further engineering wild-type enzymes, optimizing reaction conditions, introducing cascade systems, and immobilizing enzymes to increase C1 assimilation efficiencies. Researchers have produced methanol from CO2 through formate and formaldehyde using FDH, formaldehyde dehydrogenase (FalDH), and alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes. The representative CO2 reduction enzyme FDH, which produces formate from CO2, has been extensively studied. A newly discovered FDH from Thiobacillus sp. (TsFDH) has approximately 85-fold higher activity in reducing CO2 than the FDH from Candida boidinii, which is commercially available but has weak CO2 reduction activity [47]. Following this study, other FDHs have continuously been discovered from new species, such as Candida methylica, Chaetomium thermophilum, and Rhodococcus jostii, and examined for CO2 reduction [48, 49]. In addition, the introduction of a multienzyme cascade reaction with a cofactor regeneration system and the optimization of C1 reduction conditions using novel FalDH from Burkholderia multivorans showed up to 500-fold increased methanol production from CO2 compared to that of other systems [50]. Moreover, biochemical approaches involving the introduction of conductive polyaniline hydrogels and nanobiocatalysts, which are graphene-immobilized enzymes, have increased CO2 conversion efficiency [51, 52].

Studies on producing materials other than methanol from CO2 have also been conducted. A novel CA from Corynebacterium flavescens in cow saliva was isolated, which produced up to 45 mg CaCO3/mg protein from CO2 through the optimization of the reaction parameters [53]. Another dehydrogenase involved in the rTCA cycle, isocitrate dehydrogenase from Chlorobium limicola, which can assimilate CO2 to 2-oxoglutarate, was characterized [54]. In addition to dehydrogenases for CO2 fixation, various oxidoreductases, such as pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase (PFOR), oxalate oxidoreductase (OOR), 2-oxoglutarate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase (OGOR), and other 2-oxoacid:ferredoxin oxidoreductases (OFORs), whose reactions are mediated by Fd as the electron mediator, have been explored. The function of CO2 fixation in these OFORs has been identified and analyzed based on model structures [55-57]. Efforts to discover highly active CO2 sequestrating enzymes are ongoing.

Redox Cofactors and Cofactor Recycling

Not only enzymes but also redox cofactors that supply reducing power and energy play an important role in biological CO2 assimilation [58, 59]. Even for enzymes with reversible activity, cases exist in which one direction is more dominant than the other in general; notably, C1 fixation/reduction bias is more challenging than the reverse reaction. To overcome the thermodynamic barriers between substances, most carbon-fixing enzymes must receive electrons, either directly or through cofactors, which provide the driving force to reduce the C1 molecule. Therefore, the enzymes directly involved in carbon conversion are key elements, and the cofactors that promote enzymatic reactions are also critical to the overall reaction. A redox cofactor is essential for redox equivalence in terms of the electron carriers or mediators in efficient CO2 assimilation reactions. It takes and provides an electron or energy to other proteins depending on the driving force. The biological and chemical redox cofactors and their potentials are listed in Table 2. Some representative biological electron cofactors are NAD(P)+/NAD(P)H and Fd; ring-form materials, such as pyridine, quinone, and aniline, are used as chemical redox cofactors [60]. Among the chemical redox cofactors, viologen derived from 4,4’-bipyridine is widely used as a chemical electron mediator [61]. For example, CO2 is converted into carbon monoxide and formic acid at reduction potentials of –596 and –417 mV, respectively. To promote CO2 conversion, the redox cofactors with lower potential values than the –596 and –417 mV, including bipyridines, EcFd, and others, as listed in Table 2, can be applied to the CO2 reduction reaction [62]. These cofactors work as electron donors or acceptors, and the reaction can be sustained by regenerating cofactors. Cofactor regeneration is a stable and sustainable method for CO2 conversion that is cost-effective and highly productive [50]. Hence, the oxidized form of cofactors into the reduced form following C1 fixation must be reproduced for them to continuously act in cofactor-dependent enzymatic reactions. The CO2-to-methanol pathway, which is a representative C1 conversion pathway, usually requires NADH as a cofactor for C1 reduction. In each step of hydrogenation, C1 substances are reduced using the reducing power generated by NADH oxidation. NADH is regenerated while converting glutamate into 2-oxoglutarate by applying glutamate dehydrogenase to recycle NAD+ generated in C1 reduction [63-65]. In addition, other enzymes, such as glucose dehydrogenase and xylose dehydrogenase, that use NAD/NADH can also be used as recycling cofactors [66]. Other dehydrogenases, such as glycine dehydrogenase (GlyDH) and phosphite dehydrogenase (PTDH), catalyze glycine to glyoxylate and phosphite to phosphate for NADH regeneration [50, 67]. Moreover, these cofactor regeneration enzymes, PTDH and GlyDH, have optimal activities at neutral and basic pH, respectively [67]. This means that the cofactor regeneration system can be efficiently controlled according to pH.

Table 2 . Representative biological and chemical redox cofactors..

GroupType of electron carrierPDB IDProsthetic groupsRedox potential (mV)ConditionRef
Redox couplesNAD+/NADH-320pH 7.0[75]
NADP+/NADPH-320pH 7.0[75]
FMN/FMNH2-380pH 7.0[76]
FAD/FADH2-208pH 7.0, 25°C[77]
FerredoxinsAlvinFd1BLU2[4Fe-4S]-467, -640pH 7.0[78]
AvFd6FD1, 7FD1[3Fe-4S], [4Fe-4S]-420, -650pH 7.0, 0°C[78] [79]
BpFdND1[4Fe-4S]-390pH 6.0 to 7.5[80]
BtFdI/II1IQZ/1IR01[4Fe-4S]NDND[81]
CaFd1FCA, 2FDN2[4Fe-4S]NDND[81]
ClFdND2[4Fe-4S]<-500ND[58]
CpFd1CLF2[4Fe-4S]-420pH 7.0[78]
CtFdI/IIND2[4Fe-4S]-514/-584pH 7.5, at 25°C[82]
CvFd1BLU2[4Fe-4S]-461, -653pH 7.5, at 25°C[83]
DaFdI1FXR, 1DAX1[4Fe-4S]-385pH 7.0, at 23°C[81]
EcFd2ZVS2[4Fe-4S]-418, -675pH 7.0[84]
EhFdND2[4Fe-4S]-333pH 7.0[84]
HtFd17M1N1[4Fe-4S]-485pH 7.0, at 23°C[59]
MmFd1/2/3ND2[4Fe-4S]-485, -635/-520/-233, -380pH 7.0[57]
MtFdND2[4Fe-4S]-454, -487pH 7.6[85]
PaFd2FGO2[4Fe-4S]-475, -655pH 7.0[81]
SaFdND[3Fe-4S], [4Fe-4S]-275, -529pH 6.4, 0°C[86]
TaFd1RGV2[4Fe-4S]-431, -587pH 7.0, 0°C[87]
TmFd1VJW, 1ROF2[4Fe-4S]-420pH 7.0, 0°C[81]
TtFd1H98[3Fe-4S], [4Fe-4S]NDND[81]
PyridineBenzyl viologen-578.2/-745.4pH 7.4, 25°C[88]
Ethyl viologen-701.5/-992.3pH 7.4, 25°C
Methyl viologen-697.5/-1029.5pH 7.4, 25°C
1,1’-Diheptyl-4,4’-bipyridinium-626.2/-786.2pH 7.4, 25°C
1,1’-Diphenyl-4,4’-bipyridinium-457.5pH 7.4, 25°C
4,4'-Dipyridyl-1080pH 7.4, 25°C
1-Heptyl-4-(4-pyridyl) pyridinium-949pH 7.4, 25°C
2-Hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone-535.4pH 7.4, 25°C
Quinone2-Methyl-1,4-Naphthoquinone-411.7pH 7.4, 25°C

Abbreviations: Alvin: Allochromatium vinosum; Av: Azotobacter vinelandii; Bp: Bacillus polymyxa; Bt: Bacillus thermoproteolyticus; Ca: Clostridium acidurici; Cl: Chlorobium limicola; Cp: Clostridium pasteurianum; Ct: Chlorobium tepidum; Cv: Chromatium vinosum; Da: Desulfovibrio africanus; Ec: Escherichia coli; Eh: Entamoeba histolytica; Ht: Hydrogenobacter thermophiles; Mm: Magnetococcus marinus; Mt: Moorella thermoacetica; Pa: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Sa: Sulfolobus acidocaldarius; Ta: Thauera aromatica; Tm: Thermotoga maritima; Tt: Thermus thermophiles; ND: not determined..



Another breakthrough in cofactor regeneration was the application of a hybrid system with biological or chemical materials and electrochemicals [51, 68]. The use of electric power to replenish redox cofactors or provide a direct electron supply to biocatalysts is a robust and efficient approach. In the study of carbon conversion with cofactor regeneration via electrodes, diverse materials, both biological and chemical, can act as electron carriers; some systems that do not require an electron carrier can directly transfer electrons to biocatalysts. Regenerating NAD+ through an electrode with a continuous supply of electrons and conjugating FDH to a polydopamine-based bioelectrode film called PDA leads to the effective reduction of CO2 into formate [69]. Similar to the FDH-PDA bioelectrochemical method, an FDH-polyaniline hydrogel hybrid electrode was applied for effective CO2 reduction to provide a steady electron supply [51].

Studies into chemical redox polymers, such as cobaltocene-poly(allylamine), which function as electron mediators, have led to successful CO2 reduction through a continuous supply of electrons [70]. In the case of NAD-independent FDH, a sufficient amount of electrons provided by the electrode is transferred to the active site of FDH via iron–sulfur clusters to reduce CO2 [71]. Chemical materials, such as cobaltocene/cobaltocenium, were also used as electron mediators and recycled by electrodes to produce H2, CH4, C2H4, and C3H6 from H+ and CO2 [72]. In another study, for a chemical electron mediator, TiO2 was applied to carbon monoxide dehydrogenase. CO2 photoreduction was achieved by introducing silver nanoclusters, an electron-generating system that acts as a photosensitizer and an electron donor [73].

Conclusions and Perspectives

Biological and biomimicked CO2 conversion is an important and promising field in terms of reducing GHGs and generating value-added materials from CO2 or methane. Until the discovery of a novel reductive glycine pathway in 2020, six CO2 fixation pathways were known from photoautotrophic and chemoautotrophic microorganisms. As such, more pathways to CO2 fixation metabolism may exist. Therefore, efforts to identify new strains hold promise for discovering novel pathways that can use C1. This will lead to the possibility of discovering enzymes with enhanced C1 reduction activity or finding novel C1 fixation pathway enzymes and cofactors that can convert C1. However, issues such as the energy difference between the substrates and products remain challenging to overcome in the quest for efficient carbon assimilation. To overcome these obstacles, we need to not only intensively study the native enzymes directly involved in C1 assimilation but also improve their C1 reduction activity and sustainability through mutant studies using synthetic biology techniques. Additionally, we must build heterologous detour pathways, optimize reaction conditions, and conduct studies on cofactors that help the carbon utilization reaction. Furthermore, convergence studies must be conducted between biology and other fields, such as electrochemistry and nanomaterials, from various perspectives to increase the efficiency of C1 reduction. Biological C1 conversion shows promise as a sustainable and efficient method for converting CO2 into valuable chemicals; however, further research and development are necessary for its widespread use. Therefore, the field of biological C1 assimilation has considerable potential in various application fields, and continuous research in this field will considerably contribute to fulfilling the global goal of net-zero carbon emissions by reducing GHG emissions and improving carbon resource recycling.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants (2022M3J5A1056169, 2021M3A9I5023254, 2019R1A2C1090726, and 2018M3A9H3024746), a National Research Council of Science & Technology grant (No. CAP20023-200) by the Korean government (MSIT), and the Research Initiative Program of KRIBB (KGM5402322).

Author Contributions

All the authors contributed to writing the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

Abbreviation

CO2 Carbon dioxide

CO Carbon monoxide

GHG Greenhouse gases

CCUS Carbon capture, utilization, and storage

CCS Carbon capture and storage

CBB Calvin-Benson-Basham

WLP Wood-Ljungdahl pathway

rGlyP Reductive glycine pathway

rTCA Reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle

3-HP 3-hydroxypropionate

4-HB 4-hydroxybutyrate

DC Dicarboxylate

RuBisCO Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase

FDH Formate dehydrogenase

Fd Ferredoxin

10-formyl-TDF 10-formyl-tetrahydrofolate

GCS Glycine cleavage synthase system

MV Methyl viologen

PFOR Pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase

OOR Oxalate oxidoreductase

OGOR Oxoglutarate ferredoxin oxidoreductase

Fig 1.

Figure 1.An overview illustration of major CO2 assimilation pathways in nature. (1) Calvin-Benson-Basham cycle; (2) Wood-ljungdahl pathway; (3) reductive glycine pathway; (4) 3-hydroxypropionate bicycle; (5) 3-hydroxypropionate/4-hydroxybutyrate cycle; (6) dicarboxylate/4-hydroxybutyrate cycle; and (7) reductive citric acid cycle. The 3-HP bicycle, 3-HP/ 4-HB cycle, and DC/4-HB cycle are represented by green, blue, and orange lines, respectively.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2023; 33: 1403-1411https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2306.06005

Table 1 . Natural CO2 assimilation pathways..

Name of pathwayEnzymes (EC Number)CO2 fixation reactionSimplified reactionCofactor requirementsRef
Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle (CBB)Rubisco
(4.1.1.39)
Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate + CO2 → 3-Phospho glycerateC5 + C1 → 2C3-[17]
Wood-Ljungdahl pathway (WLP)Formate dehydrogenase
(1.17.1.9)
CO2 + NADPH → FormateC1 → C1NADPH[18]
Carbon monoxide dehydrogeanse
(1.2.7.4)
CO2 + Fdred → COC1 → C1reduced Fd
reductive glycine pathway (rGlyP)/
Glycine cleavage/
synthase system (GCS)
Aminomethyltransferase
(2.1.2.10)
5,10-methylene-THF + NH3 + CO2 + NADH → Glycine + THF + NAD+One carbon unit + C1 → C2NADH[74]
Glycine dehydrogenase
(1.4.4.2)
Dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase
(1.8.1.4)
3-Hydroxypropionate bicycle (3HP)Acetyl-CoA carboxylase
(6.4.1.2)
Acetyl-CoA + HCO3-+ ATP → Malonyl-CoA + ADPC2-CoA + C1 → C3-CoAATP[25]
Propionyl-CoA carboxylase
(6.4.1.3)
Propionyl-CoA + HCO3-+ ATP → (s)-Methylmalonyl-CoA + ADPC3-CoA + C1 → C4-CoAATP
3-Hydroxypropionate/ 4-Hydroxybutyrate cycle (3HP/4HB)Acetyl-CoA carboxylase
(6.4.1.2)
Acetyl-CoA + HCO3-+ ATP → Malonyl-CoA + ADPC2-CoA + C1 → C3-CoAATP[28]
Propionyl-CoA carboxylase
(6.4.1.3)
Propionyl-CoA + HCO3-+ ATP → (s)-Methylmalonyl-CoA + ADPC3-CoA + C1 → C4-CoAATP
Dicarboxylate/4-Hydroxybutyrate cycle (DC/4HB)Pyruvate synthase
(1.2.7.1)
Acetyl-CoA + CO2 + Fdred → Pyruvate + FdoxiC2-CoA + C1 → C3Reduced Fd[26]
Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase
(4.1.1.31)
Phosphoenolpyruvate + HCO3-→ OxaloacetateC3 + C1 → C4-
reverse Tricarboxylic acid cycle (rTCA)2-Oxoglutarate oxidoreductase
(1.2.7.3)
Succinyl-CoA + CO2 + Fdred → 2-Oxoglutarate + FdoxiC4 + C1 → C5Reduced Fd[29]
Isocitrate dehydrogenase
(6.4.1.7)
2-Oxoglutarate + CO2 + NAD(P)H → Isocitrate + NAD(P)+C5 + C1 → C6NAD(P)H

Table 2 . Representative biological and chemical redox cofactors..

GroupType of electron carrierPDB IDProsthetic groupsRedox potential (mV)ConditionRef
Redox couplesNAD+/NADH-320pH 7.0[75]
NADP+/NADPH-320pH 7.0[75]
FMN/FMNH2-380pH 7.0[76]
FAD/FADH2-208pH 7.0, 25°C[77]
FerredoxinsAlvinFd1BLU2[4Fe-4S]-467, -640pH 7.0[78]
AvFd6FD1, 7FD1[3Fe-4S], [4Fe-4S]-420, -650pH 7.0, 0°C[78] [79]
BpFdND1[4Fe-4S]-390pH 6.0 to 7.5[80]
BtFdI/II1IQZ/1IR01[4Fe-4S]NDND[81]
CaFd1FCA, 2FDN2[4Fe-4S]NDND[81]
ClFdND2[4Fe-4S]<-500ND[58]
CpFd1CLF2[4Fe-4S]-420pH 7.0[78]
CtFdI/IIND2[4Fe-4S]-514/-584pH 7.5, at 25°C[82]
CvFd1BLU2[4Fe-4S]-461, -653pH 7.5, at 25°C[83]
DaFdI1FXR, 1DAX1[4Fe-4S]-385pH 7.0, at 23°C[81]
EcFd2ZVS2[4Fe-4S]-418, -675pH 7.0[84]
EhFdND2[4Fe-4S]-333pH 7.0[84]
HtFd17M1N1[4Fe-4S]-485pH 7.0, at 23°C[59]
MmFd1/2/3ND2[4Fe-4S]-485, -635/-520/-233, -380pH 7.0[57]
MtFdND2[4Fe-4S]-454, -487pH 7.6[85]
PaFd2FGO2[4Fe-4S]-475, -655pH 7.0[81]
SaFdND[3Fe-4S], [4Fe-4S]-275, -529pH 6.4, 0°C[86]
TaFd1RGV2[4Fe-4S]-431, -587pH 7.0, 0°C[87]
TmFd1VJW, 1ROF2[4Fe-4S]-420pH 7.0, 0°C[81]
TtFd1H98[3Fe-4S], [4Fe-4S]NDND[81]
PyridineBenzyl viologen-578.2/-745.4pH 7.4, 25°C[88]
Ethyl viologen-701.5/-992.3pH 7.4, 25°C
Methyl viologen-697.5/-1029.5pH 7.4, 25°C
1,1’-Diheptyl-4,4’-bipyridinium-626.2/-786.2pH 7.4, 25°C
1,1’-Diphenyl-4,4’-bipyridinium-457.5pH 7.4, 25°C
4,4'-Dipyridyl-1080pH 7.4, 25°C
1-Heptyl-4-(4-pyridyl) pyridinium-949pH 7.4, 25°C
2-Hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone-535.4pH 7.4, 25°C
Quinone2-Methyl-1,4-Naphthoquinone-411.7pH 7.4, 25°C

Abbreviations: Alvin: Allochromatium vinosum; Av: Azotobacter vinelandii; Bp: Bacillus polymyxa; Bt: Bacillus thermoproteolyticus; Ca: Clostridium acidurici; Cl: Chlorobium limicola; Cp: Clostridium pasteurianum; Ct: Chlorobium tepidum; Cv: Chromatium vinosum; Da: Desulfovibrio africanus; Ec: Escherichia coli; Eh: Entamoeba histolytica; Ht: Hydrogenobacter thermophiles; Mm: Magnetococcus marinus; Mt: Moorella thermoacetica; Pa: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Sa: Sulfolobus acidocaldarius; Ta: Thauera aromatica; Tm: Thermotoga maritima; Tt: Thermus thermophiles; ND: not determined..


References

  1. Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, et al. IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers, Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
  2. Lindsey R, Dahlman L. 2023. Climate Change: Global Temperature. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
  3. Lindsey R. 2022. Climate Change: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
  4. Hoegh-Guldberg O, Jacob D, Taylor M, Bindi M, Brown S, Camilloni I, et al. 2018. Impacts of 1.5°C Global Warming on Natural and Human Systems. IPCC Special Report.
  5. Larcombe AN, Papini MG, Chivers EK, Berry LJ, Lucas RM, Wyrwoll CS. 2021. Mouse lung structure and function after long-term exposure to an atmospheric carbon dioxide level predicted by climate change modeling. Environ. Health Perspect. 129: 17001.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. McLean MJ, Mouillot D, Goascoz N, Schlaich I, Auber A. 2019. Functional reorganization of marine fish nurseries under climate warming. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25: 660-674.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Tabari H. 2020. Climate change impact on flood and extreme precipitation increases with water availability. Sci. Rep. 10: 13768.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Vats G, Mathur R. 2022. A net-zero emissions energy system in India by 2050: An exploration. J. Clean. Prod. 352: 131417.
    CrossRef
  9. Chu S. 2009. Carbon capture and sequestration. Science 325: 1599.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Zhang Y, Yu L, Cui K, Wang H, Fu T. 2023. Carbon capture and storage technology by steel-making slags: recent progress and future challenges. Chem. Eng. J. 455: 140552.
    CrossRef
  11. Vercelli S, Anderlucci J, Memoli R, Battisti N, Mabon L, Lombardi S. 2013. Informing people about CCS: a review of social research studies. Energy Procedia 37: 7464-7473.
    CrossRef
  12. Al-Mamoori A, Krishnamurthy A, Rownaghi AA, Rezaei F. 2017. Carbon capture and utilization update. Energy Technol. 5: 834-849.
    CrossRef
  13. Derrick JS, Loipersberger M, Chatterjee R, Iovan DA, Smith PT, Chakarawet K, et al. 2020. Metal-ligand cooperativity via exchange coupling promotes iron-catalyzed electrochemical CO2 reduction at low overpotentials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142: 20489-20501.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Zhang X, Guo SX, Gandionco KA, Bond AM, Zhang J. 2020. Electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction: from fundamental principles to catalyst design. Mater. Today Adv. 7: 10074.
    CrossRef
  15. Sahoo A, Chowdhury AH, Manirul Islam S, Bala T. 2022. Successful CO2 reduction under visible light photocatalysis using porous NiO nanoparticles, an atypical metal oxide. New J. Chem. 46: 10806-10813.
    CrossRef
  16. D'Amario B, Perez C, Grelaud M, Pitta P, Krasakopoulou E, Ziveri P. 2020. Coccolithophore community response to ocean acidification and warming in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea: results from a mesocosm experiment. Sci. Rep. 10: 12637.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. Stitt M, Lunn J, Usadel B. 2010. Arabidopsis and primary photosynthetic metabolism - more than the icing on the cake. Plant J. 61: 1067-1091.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Ragsdale SW, Pierce E. 2008. Acetogenesis and the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway of CO2 fixation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1784: 1873-1898.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Claassens NJ, Bordanaba-Florit G, Cotton CAR, De Maria A, Finger-Bou M, Friedeheim L, et al. 2020. Replacing the Calvin cycle with the reductive glycine pathway in Cupriavidus necator. Metab. Eng. 62: 30-41.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Modde K, Timm S, Florian A, Michl K, Fernie AR, Bauwe H. 2017. High serine:glyoxylate aminotransferase activity lowers leaf daytime serine levels, inducing the phosphoserine pathway in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 68: 643-656.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  21. Xu Y, Ren J, Wang W, Zeng AP. 2022. Improvement of glycine biosynthesis from one-carbon compounds and ammonia catalyzed by the glycine cleavage system in vitro. Eng. Life Sci. 22: 40-53.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Gonzalez de la Cruz J, Machens F, Messerschmidt K, Bar-Even A. 2019. Core catalysis of the reductive glycine pathway demonstrated in yeast. ACS Synth. Biol. 8: 911-917.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Hong Y, Arbter P, Wang W, Rojas LN, Zeng AP. 2021. Introduction of glycine synthase enables uptake of exogenous formate and strongly impacts the metabolism in Clostridium pasteurianum. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 118: 1366-1380.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Sanchez-Andrea I, Guedes IA, Hornung B, Boeren S, Lawson CE, Sousa DZ, et al. 2020. The reductive glycine pathway allows autotrophic growth of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Nat. Commun. 11: 5090.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  25. Zarzycki J, Brecht V, Muller M, Fuchs G. 2009. Identifying the missing steps of the autotrophic 3-hydroxypropionate CO2 fixation cycle in Chloroflexus aurantiacus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 21317-21322.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  26. Huber H, Gallenberger M, Jahn U, Eylert E, Berg IA, Kockelkorn D, et al. 2008. A dicarboxylate/4-hydroxybutyrate autotrophic carbon assimilation cycle in the hyperthermophilic Archaeum Ignicoccus hospitalis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 7851-7856.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  27. Hawkins AS, Han Y, Bennett RK, Adams MW, Kelly RM. 2013. Role of 4-hydroxybutyrate-CoA synthetase in the CO2 fixation cycle in thermoacidophilic archaea. J. Biol. Chem. 288: 4012-4022.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  28. Loder AJ, Han Y, Hawkins AB, Lian H, Lipscomb GL, Schut GJ, et al. 2016. Reaction kinetic analysis of the 3-hydroxypropionate/4-hydroxybutyrate CO2 fixation cycle in extremely thermoacidophilic archaea. Metab. Eng. 38: 446-463.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  29. Steffens L, Pettinato E, Steiner TM, Mall A, Konig S, Eisenreich W, et al. 2021. High CO2 levels drive the TCA cycle backwards towards autotrophy. Nature 592: 784-788.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  30. Cheng HT, Lo SC, Huang CC, Ho TY, Yang YT. 2019. Detailed profiling of carbon fixation of in silico synthetic autotrophy with reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle and Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle in Esherichia coli using hydrogen as an energy source. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 4: 165-172.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Bar-Even A, Noor E, Lewis NE, Milo R. 2010. Design and analysis of synthetic carbon fixation pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 8889-8894.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Kerfeld CA. 2016. Rewiring Escherichia coli for carbon-dioxide fixation. Nat. Biotechnol. 34: 1035-1036.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Antonovsky N, Gleizer S, Noor E, Zohar Y, Herz E, Barenholz U, et al. 2016. Sugar synthesis from CO2 in Escherichia coli. Cell 166: 115-125.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Gleizer S, Ben-Nissan R, Bar-On YM, Antonovsky N, Noor E, Zohar Y, et al. 2019. Conversion of Escherichia coli to generate all biomass carbon from CO2. Cell 179: 1255-1263.e1212.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  35. Lee SY, Kim YS, Shin W-R, Yu J, Lee J, Lee S, et al. 2020. Non-photosynthetic CO2 bio-mitigation by Escherichia coli harbouring CBB genes. Green Chem. 22: 6889-6896.
    CrossRef
  36. Flamholz AI, Dugan E, Blikstad C, Gleizer S, Ben-Nissan R, Amram S, et al. 2020. Functional reconstitution of a bacterial CO2 concentrating mechanism in Escherichia coli. Elife 9: 59882.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  37. Woolston BM, King JR, Reiter M, Van Hove B, Stephanopoulos G. 2018. Improving formaldehyde consumption drives methanol assimilation in engineered E. coli. Nat. Commun. 9: 2387.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  38. He H, Edlich-Muth C, Lindner SN, Bar-Even A. 2018. Ribulose monophosphate shunt provides nearly all biomass and energy required for growth of E. coli. ACS Synth. Biol. 7: 1601-1611.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Keller P, Noor E, Meyer F, Reiter MA, Anastassov S, Kiefer P, et al. 2020. Methanol-dependent Escherichia coli strains with a complete ribulose monophosphate cycle. Nat. Commun. 11: 5403.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  40. Kim S, Lindner SN, Aslan S, Yishai O, Wenk S, Schann K, et al. 2020. Growth of E. coli on formate and methanol via the reductive glycine pathway. Nat. Chem. Biol. 16: 538-545.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Yu H, Liao JC. 2018. A modified serine cycle in Escherichia coli coverts methanol and CO2 to two-carbon compounds. Nat. Commun. 9: 3992.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  42. He H, Hoper R, Dodenhoft M, Marliere P, Bar-Even A. 2020. An optimized methanol assimilation pathway relying on promiscuous formaldehyde-condensing aldolases in E. coli. Metab. Eng. 60: 1-13.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  43. Jo BH, Kim IG, Seo JH, Kang DG, Cha HJ. 2013. Engineered Escherichia coli with periplasmic carbonic anhydrase as a biocatalyst for CO2 sequestration. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79: 6697-6705.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  44. Kato A, Takatani N, Ikeda K, Maeda SI, Omata T. 2017. Removal of the product from the culture medium strongly enhances free fatty acid production by genetically engineered Synechococcus elongatus. Biotechnol. Biofuels 10: 141.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  45. Yunus IS, Wichmann J, Wordenweber R, Lauersen KJ, Kruse O, Jones PR. 2018. Synthetic metabolic pathways for photobiological conversion of CO2 into hydrocarbon fuel. Metab. Eng. 49: 201-211.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  46. Yunus IS, Jones PR. 2018. Photosynthesis-dependent biosynthesis of medium chain-length fatty acids and alcohols. Metab. Eng. 49: 59-68.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  47. Choe H, Joo JC, Cho DH, Kim MH, Lee SH, Jung KD, et al. 2014. Efficient CO2-reducing activity of NAD-dependent formate dehydrogenase from Thiobacillus sp. KNK65MA for formate production from CO2 gas. PLoS One 9: e103111.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  48. Aslan AS, Valjakka J, Ruupunen J, Yildirim D, Turner NJ, Turunen O, et al. 2017. Chaetomium thermophilum formate dehydrogenase has high activity in the reduction of hydrogen carbonate (HCO3-) to formate. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 30: 47-55.
  49. Boldt A, Ansorge‐Schumacher MB. 2020. Formate dehydrogenase from Rhodococcus jostii (RjFDH) - A high‐performance tool for NADH regeneration. Adv. Synth. Catal. 362: 4109-4118.
    CrossRef
  50. Singh RK, Singh R, Sivakumar D, Kondaveeti S, Kim T, Li J, et al. 2018. Insights into cell-free conversion of CO2 to chemicals by a multienzyme cascade reaction. ACS Catal. 8: 11085-11093.
    CrossRef
  51. Kuk SK, Gopinath K, Singh RK, Kim TD, Lee Y, Choi WS, et al. 2019. NADH-free electroenzymatic reduction of CO2 by conductive hydrogel-conjugated formate dehydrogenase. ACS Catal. 9: 5584-5589.
    CrossRef
  52. Seelajaroen H, Bakandritsos A, Otyepka M, Zboril R, Sariciftci NS. 2020. Immobilized enzymes on graphene as nanobiocatalyst. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12: 250-259.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  53. Sharma T, Kumar A. 2021. Efficient reduction of CO2 using a novel carbonic anhydrase producing Corynebacterium flavescens. Environ. Eng. Res. 26: 200191.
    CrossRef
  54. Kanao T, Kawamura M, Fukui T, Atomi H, Imanaka T. 2002. Characterization of isocitrate dehydrogenase from the green sulfur bacterium Chlorobium limicola. A carbon dioxide-fixing enzyme in the reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle. Eur. J. Biochem. 269: 1926-1931.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  55. Katsyv A, Schoelmerich MC, Basen M, Muller V. 2021. The pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase of the thermophilic acetogen, Thermoanaerobacter kivui. FEBS Open Bio 11: 1332-1342.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  56. Gibson MI, Brignole EJ, Pierce E, Can M, Ragsdale SW, Drennan CL. 2015. The structure of an oxalate oxidoreductase provides insight into microbial 2-oxoacid metabolism. Biochemistry 54: 4112-4120.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  57. Chen PY, Li B, Drennan CL, Elliott SJ. 2019. A reverse TCA cycle 2-oxoacid:ferredoxin oxidoreductase that makes C-C bonds from CO2. Joule 3: 595-611.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  58. Li B, Steindel P, Haddad N, Elliott SJ. 2021. Maximizing (Electro)catalytic CO2 reduction with a ferredoxin-based reduction potential gradient. ACS Catal. 11: 4009-4023.
    CrossRef
  59. Li B, Elliott SJ. 2016. The Catalytic Bias of 2-Oxoacid:ferredoxin Oxidoreductase in CO2: evolution and reduction through a ferredoxin-mediated electrocatalytic assay. Electrochim. Acta 199: 349-356.
    CrossRef
  60. Wayama F, Hatsugai N, Okumura Y. 2022. Bipyridines mediate electron transfer from an electrode to nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate. PLoS One 17: e0269693.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  61. Striepe L, Baumgartner T. 2017. Viologens and their application as functional materials. Chem. Eur. J. 23: 16924-16940.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  62. Bar-Even A, Flamholz A, Noor E, Milo R. 2012. Thermodynamic constraints shape the structure of carbon fixation pathways. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1817: 1646-1659.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  63. El-Zahab B, Donnelly D, Wang P. 2008. Particle-tethered NADH for production of methanol from CO2 catalyzed by coimmobilized enzymes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 99: 508-514.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  64. Ren S, Wang Z, Bilal M, Feng Y, Jiang Y, Jia S, et al. 2020. Co-immobilization multienzyme nanoreactor with co-factor regeneration for conversion of CO2. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 155: 110-118.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  65. Ji X, Su Z, Wang P, Ma G, Zhang S. 2015. Tethering of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide inside hollow nanofibers for high-yield synthesis of methanol from carbon dioxide catalyzed by coencapsulated multienzymes. ACS Nano. 9: 4600-4610.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  66. Marpani F, Sarossy Z, Pinelo M, Meyer AS. 2017. Kinetics based reaction optimization of enzyme catalyzed reduction of formaldehyde to methanol with synchronous cofactor regeneration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 114: 2762-2770.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  67. Cazelles R, Drone J, Fajula F, Ersen O, Moldovan S, Galarneau A. 2013. Reduction of CO2 to methanol by a polyenzymatic system encapsulated in phospholipids-silica nanocapsules. New J. Chem. 37: 3721-3730.
    CrossRef
  68. Song H, Ma C, Liu P, You C, Lin J, Zhu Z. 2019. A hybrid CO2 electroreduction system mediated by enzyme-cofactor conjugates coupled with Cu nanoparticle-catalyzed cofactor regeneration. J. CO2 Util. 34: 568-575.
    CrossRef
  69. Lee SY, Lim SY, Seo D, Lee J-Y, Chung TD. 2016. Light-driven highly selective conversion of CO2 to formate by electrosynthesized enzyme/cofactor thin film electrode. Adv. Energy Mater. 6: 1502207.
    CrossRef
  70. Yuan M, Sahin S, Cai R, Abdellaoui S, Hickey DP, Minteer SD, et al. 2018. Creating a low-potential redox polymer for efficient electroenzymatic CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57: 6582-6586.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  71. Reda T, Plugge CM, Abram NJ, Hirst J. 2008. Reversible interconversion of carbon dioxide and formate by an electroactive enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 10654-10658.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  72. Cai R, Milton RD, Abdellaoui S, Park T, Patel J, Alkotaini B, et al. 2018. Electroenzymatic C-C Bond Formation from CO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140: 5041-5044.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  73. Zhang L, Can M, Ragsdale SW, Armstrong FA. 2018. Fast and selective photoreduction of CO2 to CO catalyzed by a complex of carbon monoxide dehydrogenase, TiO2, and Ag nanoclusters. ACS Catal. 8: 2789-2795.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  74. Kim S, Giraldo N, Rainaldi V, Machens F, Collas F, Kubis A, et al. 2023. Optimizing E. coli as a formatotrophic platform for bioproduction via the reductive glycine pathway. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11: 1091899.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  75. Davies KJ, Doroshow JH. 1986. Redox cycling of anthracyclines by cardiac mitochondria. I. Anthracycline radical formation by NADH dehydrogenase. J. Biol. Chem. 261: 3060-3067.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  76. Dutton PL, Moser CC, Sled VD, Daldal F, Ohnishi T. 1998. A reductant-induced oxidation mechanism for complex I. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 1364: 245-257.
    CrossRef
  77. Kay CJ, Barber MJ, Notton BA, Solomonson LP. 1989. Oxidation--reduction midpoint potentials of the flavin, haem and Mo-pterin centres in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) nitrate reductase. Biochem. J. 263: 285-287.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  78. Giastas P, Pinotsis N, Efthymiou G, Wilmanns M, Kyritsis P, Moulis J-M, et al. 2006. The structure of the 2[4Fe-4S] ferredoxin from Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 1.32-Å resolution: comparison with other high-resolution structures of ferredoxins and contributing structural features to reduction potential values. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 11: 445-458.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  79. Schipke CG, Goodin DB, McRee DE, Stout CD. 1999. Oxidized and reduced Azotobacter vinelandii ferredoxin I at 1.4 A resolution: conformational change of surface residues without significant change in the [3Fe-4S]+/0 cluster. Biochemistry 38: 8228-8239.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  80. Yoch DC, Valentine RC. 1972. Four-iron (sulfide) ferredoxin from Bacillus polymyxa. J. Bacteriol. 110: 1211-1213.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  81. Giastas P, Pinotsis N, Efthymiou G, Wilmanns M, Kyritsis P, Moulis JM, et al. 2006. The structure of the 2[4Fe-4S] ferredoxin from Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 1.32-A resolution: comparison with other high-resolution structures of ferredoxins and contributing structural features to reduction potential values. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 11: 445-458.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  82. Yoon KS, Bobst C, Hemann CF, Hille R, Tabita FR. 2001. Spectroscopic and functional properties of novel 2[4Fe-4S] clustercontaining ferredoxins from the green sulfur bacterium Chlorobium tepidum. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 44027-44036.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  83. Kyritsis P, Hatzfeld OM, Link TA, Moulis JM. 1998. The two [4Fe-4S] clusters in Chromatium vinosum ferredoxin have largely different reduction potentials. Structural origin and functional consequences. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 15404-15411.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  84. Saridakis E, Giastas P, Efthymiou G, Thoma V, Moulis JM, Kyritsis P, et al. 2009. Insight into the protein and solvent contributions to the reduction potentials of [4Fe-4S]2+/+ clusters: crystal structures of the Allochromatium vinosum ferredoxin variants C57A and V13G and the homologous Escherichia coli ferredoxin. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 14: 783-799.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  85. Bender G, Ragsdale SW. 2011. Evidence that ferredoxin interfaces with an internal redox shuttle in Acetyl-CoA synthase during reductive activation and catalysis. Biochemistry 50: 276-286.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  86. Breton JL, Duff JL, Butt JN, Armstrong FA, George SJ, Petillot Y, et al. 1995. Identification of the iron-sulfur clusters in a ferredoxin from the archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. Evidence for a reduced [3Fe-4S] cluster with pH-dependent electronic properties. Eur. J. Biochem. 233: 937-946.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  87. Boll M, Fuchs G, Tilley G, Armstrong FA, Lowe DJ. 2000. Unusual spectroscopic and electrochemical properties of the 2[4Fe-4S] ferredoxin of Thauera aromatica. Biochemistry 39: 4929-4938.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  88. Abdul Wahab R, Wayama F, Hatsugai N, Okumura Y. 2022. Bipyridines mediate electron transfer from an electrode to nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate. PLoS One 17: e0269693.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef