전체메뉴
검색
Article Search

JMB Journal of Microbiolog and Biotechnology

QR Code QR Code

Research article


References

  1. Yabuuchi E, Yano I, Oyaizu H, Hashimoto Y, Ezaki T, Yamamoto H. 1990. Proposals of Sphingomonas paucimobilis gen. nov. and comb. nov., Sphingomonas parapaucimobilis sp. nov., Sphingomonas yanoikuyae sp. nov., Sphingomonas adhaesiva sp. nov., Sphingomonas capsulata comb. nov., and two genospecies of the genus Sphingomonas. Microbiol. Immunol. 34: 99-119.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Takeuchi M, Hamana K, Hiraishi A. 2001. Proposal of the genus Sphingomonas sensu stricto and three new genera, Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis, on the basis of phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic analyses. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51: 1405-1417.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Dong L, Li S, Lian WH, Wei QC, Mohamad OAA, Hozzein WN, Ahmed I, Li WJ. 2022. Sphingomonas arenae sp. nov., isolated from desert soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 72. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005195.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Kim H, Chhetri G, Seo T. 2021. Sphingomonas xanthus sp. nov., isolated from beach soil. Curr. Microbiol. 78: 403-410.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Shen L, Liu P, An M, Liang R, He X, Zhao G. 2022. Sphingomonas quercus sp. nov., isolated from Rhizosphere soil of Quercus mongolica. Curr. Microbiol. 79: 122.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Kang M, Chhetri G, Kim J, Kim I, Seo T. 2021. Sphingomonas sabuli sp. nov., a carotenoid-producing bacterium isolated from beach sand. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 71. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004896.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Sheu SY, Yang CC, Sheu DS, Tsai JM, Chen WM. 2020. Sphingomonas lacunae sp. nov., isolated from a freshwater pond. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 70: 5899-5910.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Kim I, Chhetri G, So Y, Jung Y, Park S, Seo T. 2022. Sphingomonas liriopis sp. nov., Sphingomonas donggukensis sp. nov., and Sphingomonas tagetis sp. nov., isolated from Liriope platyphylla fruit, soil, and Tagetes patula roots. Arch. Microbiol. 205: 16.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Madhaiyan M, Saravanan VS, Wirth JS, Alex THH, Kim SJ, Weon HY, et al. 2020. Sphingomonas palmae sp. nov. and Sphingomonas gellani sp. nov., endophytically associated phyllosphere bacteria isolated from economically important crop plants. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 113: 1617-1632.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Jiang L, Seo J, Peng Y, Jeon D, Lee JH, Kim CY, et al. 2023. A nostoxanthin-producing bacterium, Sphingomonas nostoxanthinifaciens sp. nov., alleviates the salt stress of Arabidopsis seedlings by scavenging of reactive oxygen species. Front. Microbiol. 14: 1101150.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  11. Zhang DF, Cui XW, Zhao Z, Zhang AH, Huang JK, Li WJ. 2020. Sphingomonas hominis sp. nov., isolated from hair of a 21-year-old girl. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 113: 1523-1530.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Xue H, Piao CG, Wang XZ, Lin CL, Guo MW, Li Y. 2018. Sphingomonas aeria sp. nov., isolated from air. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 68: 2866-2871.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Heidler von Heilborn D, Reinmuller J, Holzl G, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Woehle C, Marek M, et al. 2021. Sphingomonas aliaeris sp. nov., a new species isolated from pork steak packed under modified atmosphere. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 71. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004973.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Liu Y, Chen T, Cui X, Xu Y, Hu S, Zhao Y, et al. 2022. Sphingomonas radiodurans sp. nov., a novel radiation-resistant bacterium isolated from the north slope of Mount Everest. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 72. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005312.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Zhou XY, Zhang L, Su XJ, Hang P, Hu B, Jiang JD. 2019. Sphingomonas flavalba sp. nov., isolated from a procymidone-contaminated soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 69: 2936-2941.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Chen L, Chen WF, Xu ZL, Li W, Zhang XY, Li WJ, et al. 2018. Sphingomonas oleivorans sp. nov., isolated from oil-contaminated soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 68: 3720-3725.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Feng GD, Wang YH, Zhang XJ, Chen WD, Zhang J, Xiong X, et al. 2019. Sphingomonas lenta sp. nov., a slowly growing bacterium isolated from an abandoned lead-zinc mine. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 69: 2214-2219.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Li Y, Bian DR, Chang JP, Guo LM, Yang XQ. 2020. Sphingomonas populi sp. nov., isolated from bark of Populus x euramericana. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 70: 897-901.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Thaller MC, D'Andrea MM, Marmo P, Civitareale C, Casu F, Migliore L. 2018. Sphingomonas turrisvirgatae sp. nov., an agardegrading species isolated from freshwater. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 68: 2794-2799.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Zhang H, Xu L, Zhang JX, Sun JQ. 2020. Sphingomonas suaedae sp. nov., a chitin-degrading strain isolated from rhizosphere soil of Suaeda salsa. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 70: 3816-3823.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Luo YR, Tian Y, Huang X, Kwon K, Yang SH, Seo HS, et al. 2012. Sphingomonas polyaromaticivorans sp. nov., a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium from an oil port water sample. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 62: 1223-1227.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Jiang L, Peng Y, Seo J, Jeon D, Jo MG, Lee JH, et al. 2022. Subtercola endophyticus sp. nov., a cold-adapted bacterium isolated from Abies koreana. Sci. Rep. 12: 12114.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  23. Jiang L, Pheng S, Lee KC, Kang SW, Jeong JC, Kim CY, et al. 2019. Cohnella abietis sp. nov., isolated from Korean fir (Abies koreana) rhizospheric soil of Halla mountain. J. Microbiol. 57: 953-958.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Senthilraj R, Prasad GS, Janakiraman K. 2016. Sequence-based identification of microbial contaminants in non-parenteral products. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 52: 329-336. d.
    CrossRef
  25. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, Seo H, et al. 2017. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 67: 1613-1617.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  26. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. 2021. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38: 3022-3027.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  27. Rodriguez RL, Gunturu S, Harvey WT, Rossello-Mora R, Tiedje JM, Cole JR, et al. 2018. The Microbial Genomes Atlas (MiGA) webserver: taxonomic and gene diversity analysis of Archaea and Bacteria at the whole genome level. Nucleic Acids Res. 46: W282-W288.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  28. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. 2013. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14: 60.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  29. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. 2005. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J. Bacteriol. 187: 6258-6264.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  30. Na SI, Kim YO, Yoon SH, Ha SM, Baek I, Chun J. 2018. UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J. Microbiol. 56: 280-285.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Sasser M. 2006. Bacterial identification by gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acids methyl esters (GC-FAME). MIDI Technical MIDI Technical Note #101 MIDI Inc, Newark, DE, USA.
  32. Collins M, Shah H, Minnikin D. 1980. A note on the separation of natural mixtures of bacterial menaquinones using reverse phase thin‐layer chromatography. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 48: 277-282.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Lee SA, Kim Y, Sang MK, Song J, Kwon SW, Weon HY. 2019. Chryseolinea soli sp. nov., isolated from soil. J. Microbiol. 57: 122-126.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. 2014. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 64: 346-351.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR, da Costa MS, et al. 2018. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 68: 461-466.
    Pubmed CrossRef

Related articles in JMB

More Related Articles

Article

Research article

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023; 33(10): 1292-1298

Published online October 28, 2023 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2303.03017

Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Sphingomonas abietis sp. nov., an Endophytic Bacterium Isolated from Korean Fir

Lingmin Jiang1,3, Hanna Choe1, Yuxin Peng1, Doeun Jeon1, Donghyun Cho1, Yue Jiang1, Ju Huck Lee1,2, Cha Young Kim1, and Jiyoung Lee1,2*

1Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC), Biological Resource Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Jeongeup 56212, Republic of Korea
2Department of Biosystem and Bioengineering, KRIBB School of Biotechnology, University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
3Present address: National Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China

Correspondence to:Jiyoung Lee,         jiyoung1@kribb.re.kr

Received: March 14, 2023; Revised: June 20, 2023; Accepted: July 6, 2023

Abstract

PAMB 00755T, a bacterial strain, was isolated from Korean fir leaves. The strain exhibits yellow colonies and consists of Gram-negative, non-motile, short rods or ovoid-shaped cells. It displays optimal growth conditions at 20°C, 0% NaCl, and pH 6.0. Results of 16S rRNA gene-based phylogenetic analyses showed that strain PAMB 00755T was most closely related to Sphingomonas chungangi MAH-6T (97.7%) and Sphingomonas polyaromaticivorans B2-7T (97.4%), and ≤96.5% sequence similarity to other members of the genus Sphingomonas. The values of average nucleotide identity (79.9–81.3%), average amino acid identity (73.3–75.9%), and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (73.3–75.9%) were significantly lower than the threshold values for species boundaries; these overall genome-related indexes (OGRI) analyses indicated that the strain represents a novel species. Genomic analysis revealed that the strain has a 4.4-Mbp genome encoding 4,083 functional genes, while the DNA G+C content of the whole genome is 66.1%. The genome of strain PAMB 00755T showed a putative carotenoid biosynthetic cluster responsible for its antioxidant activity. The respiratory quinone was identified as ubiquinone 10 (Q-10), while the major fatty acids in the profile were identified as C18:1ω7c and/or C18:1ω6c (summed feature 8). The major polar lipids of strain PAMB 00755T were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, sphingoglycolipid, and phosphatidylcholine. Based on a comprehensive analysis of genomic, phenotypic, and chemotaxonomic characteristics, we proposed the name Sphingomonas abietis sp. nov. for this novel species, with PAMB 00755T as the type strain (= KCTC 92781T = GDMCC 1.3779T).

Keywords: Polyphasic taxonomy, Korean fir, phylogeny, AntiSMASH, endophytic bacterium

Introduction

Sphingomonas is a type of Gram-negative, rod-shaped or ovoid bacteria in the family Sphingomonadaceae and order Sphingomonadale. The genus was first introduced by Yabuuchi in 1990 [1] with Sphingomonadaceae paucimobilis as the type species (basonym: Pseudomonas paucimobilis). In 2001, further classification based on phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic analyses subdivided the genus Sphingomonas into three new genera: Sphingobium, Novosphingobium, and Sphingopyxis [2]. As of February 2023, there were 152 published species in the genus Sphingomonas, characterized by the presence of Q-10 as the predominant isoprenoid and C16:0, C14:0-2OH, and C18:1ω7c and/or C18:1ω6c (summed feature 8) as the major fatty acids. Sphingomonas species have been found in various environmental sources, including water, soil [3-5], sand [6], fish ponds [7], fruit [8], plants [8-10], hair [11], and air [12, 13]. Some species in this genus have been identified as radiation resistant [14], able to survive in procymidone-contaminated environments [15], and able to thrive in oil-contaminated soil [16], lead–zinc mines [17], and bark [18]. Additionally, some species were found to have agar-degrading [19], chitin-degrading [20], and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading [21] activities.

In this study, we isolated a new bacterial strain designated PAMB 00755T from the leaves of Korean fir (Abies koreana) growing on Hallasan Mountain, Jeju Island, South Korea. In 2011, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) identified a Korean fir (Abies koreana) as an endangered species in Korea. In recent years, to investigate the bacterial community associated with Korean fir and identify potential bioactive secondary metabolites of the host, we collected leaves from both healthy and diseased firs and analyzed the endophytic bacterial community [10, 22, 23]. In this study, through a polyphasic taxonomic analysis of leaves from a healthy fir, we characterized strain PAMB 00755T as a novel species in the genus Sphingomonas.

Materials and Methods

Isolation and Ecology

Leaves were collected from the Korean fir growing on Hallasan Mountain (33°21'42''N, 126°31'45''E) on Jeju Island, South Korea. To prepare the sample, five grams of leaves were subjected to surface sterilization using 1%NaOCl solution. The leaves were rinsed five times with distilled water. The sterilized leaves were then homogenized using a blender with 10 ml of 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). To remove any debris, the resulting mixture was filtered through four layers of sterile cheesecloth and then serially diluted using a standard dilution method with 1× PBS buffer. A volume of 100 μl from the sample solution was evenly spread onto Reasoner's 2A agar (R2A, Difco) plates, followed by incubation at 25°C for 1 week. Single colonies were then re-streaked onto fresh R2A medium. Strain PAMB 00755T, which formed circular, smooth, yellow colonies, was selected for the following study. The strain was stored at -80°C in 10% skimmed milk. It is currently accessible through the Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC 92781T) and the Guangdong Microbial Culture Collection Center (GDMCC 1.3779T). Unless otherwise noted, bacterial cells were cultured on R2A for 3–4 days before performing subsequent tests.

16S rRNA Gene Sequence Analysis

The extraction of genomic DNA from the bacteria was performed to serve as a template for PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene. Universal bacterial primers, specifically 27F and 1492R, were used for the amplification process. The PCR products were sequenced by a commercial company (Macrogen Inc., Korea) using the primers 27F, 518F, 800R, and 1492R [24]. The almost full length of the 16S rRNA sequence was assembled using Vector NTI software (1.6.1). The obtained sequences were compared in the EzBioCloud and the NCBI database [25]. The alignment of multiple sequences was performed using BioEdit software. Subsequently, the construction of the phylogenetic tree was carried out using the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 11.0. The neighbor-joining (NJ), maximum likelihood (ML), and minimum parsimony (MP) methods were used for this analysis, with 1,000 bootstrap iterations [26]. The outgroup was Usitatibacter rugosus 0125-3T.

Whole-Genome Characteristics

Genomic DNA was extracted as previously described [10]. For whole-genome sequencing, the PacBio RSII system (Pacific Biosciences, Inc., USA) as well as an Illumina sequencing platform by Macrogen, Inc. (Korea), were utilized. The obtained raw data were de novo assembled using SMRT LINK (12.0) software. To evaluate the quality, completeness, and contamination of the assembled genome, the Microbial Genomes Atlas (MiGA) webserver was employed [27]. The NCBI’s Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) was utilized for genome annotation. To determine the overall genomic relatedness values between strain PAMB 00755T and closely related strains, various tools were employed. The Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculation (GGDC) webserver (http://ggdc.dsmz.de/distcalc2.php) was used for digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) [28]. The AAI calculator (http://enve-omics.ce.gatech.edu/aai/) was used for average amino acid identity (AAI) [29], and the ANI calculator (http://enve-omics.ce.gatech.edu/ani/) was used for average nucleotide identity (ANI). Based on the latest bacterial core gene set and pipeline (UBCG) analysis, a comprehensive phylogenomic tree was constructed. This analysis incorporated 92 core genes, ensuring a robust representation of the evolutionary relationships among the bacterial strains [30]. The outgroup was Usitatibacter rugosus 0125-3T.

Chemotaxonomic Characterization

Chemotaxonomic features, including cellular fatty acids, polyamines, isoprenoid quinones, and polar lipids, were investigated. For cellular fatty acid analysis, approximately 40 mg of fresh cells from the third quadrant of the streaked plates were collected. The cellular fatty acids were extracted as previously described [22] using a MIDI Sherlock Microbial Identification System (6.0). The samples were subjected to gas chromatography using a 6890N gas chromatography system (Agilent Technologies, USA), and the data were identified using the TSBA6 database of the Microbial Identification software package [31]. Polyamines were extracted from 0.1 g of freeze-dried cells and analyzed by comparison to spermine, putrescine, spermidine, and homospermidine standards in Ace Emzyme Inc. (Korea). Isoprenoid quinones were extracted using the method outlined by Collins et al. (1980) [32] and subsequently analyzed by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. The extraction of polar lipids was carried out from 0.1 g of freeze-dried cells using a chloroform–methanol (2:1). Following the extraction, two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography was performed to separate the polar lipids that were obtained. To visualize the polar lipids on the TLC plates, four different spray reagents were used: molybdenum blue (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 4% phosphomolybdic acid reagent, 0.2% ninhydrin (Sigma-Aldrich), and Dragendorff ’s solution.

Phenotypic Characteristics

After culturing strain PAMB 00755T on R2A medium for 3 days, the morphological features of the strain were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at the Korean Basic Science Institute in Chuncheon. To examine motility, a semi-solid R2A medium supplemented with 0.4% agar was used. The Gram staining procedure was conducted using a Gram staining kit (Difco), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Catalase activity was assessed by observing bubbles production upon addition of a 3% (v/v) hydrogen peroxide solution to fresh cells. Oxidase activity was determined by observing the development of a purple color using an oxidase reagent kit. The strain was grown on various media, comprising R2A, nutrient agar (NA), potato dextrose agar (PDA), trypticase soy agar (TSA), marine agar 2216 (MA), and Luria-Bertani (LB) agar to determine the optimum medium. The strain was grown on PDA at 4, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 37, 40, 45, 50 and 60°C for 7 days to determine the optimal temperature. Salt tolerance was tested by growing the strain in R2A broth with concentrations from 0 to 15% (w/v) in increments of 1% [33], and pH tolerance was tested by growing the strain at a pH from 3.0 to 12.0 in increments of 1. Other biochemical features were tested using API 20NE (bioMérieux; substrate utilization, France) or API ZYM (bioMérieux; enzyme activities; NaCl 0.85% medium) and API 50CH (bioMérieux; production from carbohydrates) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Results and Discussion

Phenotypic, Physiological, and Biochemical Characteristics

Strain PAMB 00755T exhibited optimum (and robust) growth on both PDA and R2A media, limited growth on NA, and no growth on TSA, LB, or MA. The cells are Gram-negative, non-motile, and short rods or ovoid (0.3–1.0 × 0.4–1.2 μm) without flagella (Fig. S1). Colonies were yellowish and ranged from 2–4 mm in diameter after being grown for 3 days on PDA medium. The strain grew at pH 4.0–9.0 (optimum pH, 6.0), 0–1% of NaCl (optimum NaCl concentration, 0%), and 4–25°C (optimum temperature, 20°C). It tested positive for catalase and oxidase activity. Other characteristics that distinguished strain PAMB 00755T from closely related strains are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 . Distinguishing physiological and biochemical characteristics of strain PAMB 00755T and its closely related type strains..

Characteristic123
Isolation sourceKorea firGarden soilaOil port waterb
Colony colorYellowLight yellowYellowb
Colony shapeShort rods or ovoidRodsaShort rodsb
OxidasePositiveWeakaNegativeb
Colony size (mm)2–40.6–1.2a2–3b
Cell size (µm)0.3–1.0 × 0.4–1.20.3–0.5 × 1.3–2.2a1.04–1.90 × 0.52–0.75b
Growth at:
Temperature (°C), range (optimum)4–25 (20)15–35 (30)a20–35 (26)b
Optimum mediaPDA and R2ANA and R2AaLBb
NaCl tolerance (%, w/v), range (optimum)0–1 (0)0–0.5 (0)a0.5–3.0 (0.5)b
pH, range (optimum)4.0–9.0 (6)5.0–7.0 (6.5)a4.0–7.5 (7)b
Assimilation (API 20NE) of:
β-galactosidase+--
Glucose--+
Arabinose--+
API 50CH
Arbutinw-w
Esculin ferric citratew-w
Salicin+++
D-cellobiosew-
Maltosew-w
D-lactosew-w
D-melezitosew-w
API ZYM
Trypsinw+w
β-galactosidase+--
N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase+-+

Strains: 1, Sphingomonas abietis PAMB 00755T; 2, S. chungangi KACC 19292T; 3, S. polyaromaticivorans KCTC 82794T; “+”, positive, “w”, weakly positive, “−“, negative. Unless stated otherwise, all data are from our study. aAkter and Huq, 2020, bLuo, et al., 2012..



Phylogenetic Analyses

The complete 16S rRNA gene amplicon (1443 nucleotides) of strain PAMB 00755T was obtained after assembly using Vector NTI software (1.6.1). Based on comparing the 16S rRNA sequence to the EzBioCloud and NCBI databases, strain PAMB 00755T is related to members of the genus Sphingomonas, with the highest similarity to S. chungangi MAH-6T (97.7%), S. polyaromaticivorans B2-7T (97.4%), and S. oligoaromativorans SY-6T (96.5%), and ≤96.0% similarity to other members of the genus Sphingomonas. In particular, the strain showed 93.0% 16S rRNA gene similarity to the recently proposed Sphingomonas nostoxanthinifaciens strain AK-PDB1-5T based on using BioEdit software (7.2) [10]. Based on the novel species recognition cut-off value of < 98.6% [34], the strain was classified as a novel species of the genus Sphingomonas. To establish the phylogenetic position of the strain, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the 16S rRNA gene sequence. The results showed that strain PAMB 00755T clustered with S. chungangi MAH-6T and S. polyaromaticivorans B2-7T (Fig. 1). Based on the similarity of the 16S rRNA gene sequence and phylogenetic tree analysis, strain PAMB 00755T was finally identified as a member of the Sphingomonas. To perform comparative analysis under identical conditions, Sphingomonas. S. chungangi MAH-6T (= KACC 19292T) and S. polyaromaticivorans B2-7T (= KCTC 82794T) were selected.

Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene in strain PAMB 00755T and related species within the genus Sphingomonas. The presented values indicate bootstrap values (>70%) obtained using the neighbor-joining (NJ), maximum likelihood (ML), and minimum parsimony (MP) algorithms. The scale bar represents 0.050 substitutions per nucleotide position.

Genomic and Phylogenomic Analysis

The complete genome of strain PAMB 00755T was sequenced, resulting in a complete circular chromosome of 4,429,509 bp after de novo assembly using a microbial genome assembly application. The genome completeness, contamination, and quality values were determined to be 100, 0.9, and 95.5%, respectively. The G+C content of the genome was calculated to be 66.1%, similar to other species in the genus Sphingomonas, which have a high G+C content (57.4–70.5 mol%) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.gov/genome/?term=Sphingomonas). The genome annotation revealed the presence of 4,083 coding sequences (CDS), 59 tRNAs, and 12 rRNAs. Overall genome-related index (OGRI) analyses, involving dDDH, ANI, and AAI, were performed to determine the genetic relationships between strain PAMB 00755T and closely related strains in the genus Sphingomonas. The dDDH values between strain PAMB 00755T and its closely related strains of S. chungangi CGMCC 1.136T, S. oligoaromativorans DSM 102246T, S. ginsenosidimutans KACC 14949T, S. adhaesiva DSM 7418T, S. endophytica DSM 101535T, and Sphingomonas morindae NBD5T were 24.3, 22.6, 19.7, 19.5, 19.7, and 20%, respectively. The ANI values between strain PAMB 00755T and the abovementioned strains were 81.3, 79.9, 73.5, 73.4, 73.4, and 76.2%, respectively, while the AAI values were 75.9, 73.3, 59.2, 59.8, 59.5, and 67.1%, respectively. Considering the threshold values recommended for the bacterial species delineation, dDDH (<70%), ANI (<95–96%), and AAI (<95–96%) [35], strain PAMB 00755T was identified as a novel strain in the genus Sphingomonas. The phylogenomic tree based on the whole genome also supported the placement of strain PAMB 00755T within the genus Sphingomonas (Fig. 2). Fig. S2 shows a circular map of the strain PAMB 00755T genome drawn using the CGView website. Annotation and analysis of secondary metabolite biosynthesis genes using anti-SMASH revealed that strain PAMB 00755T contained a carotenoid biosynthesis cluster belonging to the terpenes (Table S1). The gene cluster involved in carotenoid biosynthesis could play an important role in antioxidant activity; however, further investigation is required to elucidate the exact bioactive chemicals and pathways for antioxidant activity.

Figure 2. Phylogenomic tree of genus Sphingomonas based on the up-to-date bacterial core gene set (UBCG) showing the position of strain PAMB 00755T. At the nodes, the gene support index (GSI) is presented on the left side, while bootstrap values are indicated on the right side. The scale bar corresponds to 0.20 substitutions per position.

Chemotaxonomic Features

Table 2 shows that C18:1ω7c and/or C18:1ω6c (summed feature 8) (72.1%) is the major fatty acid of strain PAMB 00755T, which is similar to other closely related strains such as S. chungangi KACC 19292T and S. polyaromaticivorans KCTC 82794T. However, S. polyaromaticivorans KCTC 82794T had C19:0 cyclo ω8c (15.6%) as an additional major fatty acid, which distinguishes it from strain PAMB 00755T. The major polyamines in strain PAMB 00755T were homospermidine (72.7%), putrescine (24.4%), and spermidine (2.4%) (Fig. S3), which is similar to other members of the genus Sphingomonas [16, 17, 20, 21]. The respiratory quinone of strain PAMB 00755T was ubiquinone 10 (Q-10), consistent with other members of the genus Sphingomonas. The polar lipids in strain PAMB 00755T were diphosphatidylglycerol (DPG), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), sphingoglycolipid (SGL), phosphatidylcholine (PC), two unknown lipids (L1–L2), and four unknown aminolipids (AL1–AL4), phosphatidyl-N-methylethanolamine (PME), and an unknown aminophosphoglycolipid (APGL) (Fig. S4). Strain PAMB 00755T had more polar lipid forms than other closely related strains.

Table 2 . Comparisons of cellular fatty acid profiles between strain PAMB 00755T and closely related strains in the genus Sphingomonas..

123
C14:0NDND0.8
C16:06.78.46.2
C17:01.1NDND
C18:00.8ND0.5
C17:1ω6c4.61.6ND
C18:1ω5c1.9ND1.7
C19:0 cyclo ω8cNDND15.6
C12:0-2OH1.3ND0.7
C13:0-2OH0.7NDND
C14:0-2OH6.88.57.3
C15:0-2OH0.6NDND
Summed feature 3a1.1NDND
Summed feature 8a72.181.567.2

Strains: 1, Sphingomonas abietis PAMB 00755T; 2, S. chungangi KACC 19292T; 3, S. polyaromaticivorans KCTC 82794T; “ND” represents not detected. The major components (>10%) are highlighted in bold. All the data presented in this study were obtained from the present study. aSummed features refer to groups of two or three fatty acids that cannot be individually distinguished using gas chromatography with the MIDI System. Summed feature 3 includes C16:1 ω6c and/or C16:1 ω7c, while summed feature 8 includes C18:1 ω7c and/or C18:1 ω6c..



Collectively, the finding from phylogenetic, genomic, phenotypic, and chemotaxonomic analyses indicate that strain PAMB 00755T is a novel species within the genus Sphingomonas. The distinguishing phenotypic properties and chemotaxonomic data presented in Table 1, along with the low 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities (<97.7%), ANI (<81.3%), AAI (<75.9%), and dDDH (<24.3%) values compared to closely related strains in the genus Sphingomonas, support this conclusion. These values (16S rRNA similarities, ANI/AAI, dDDH) are much lower than the established thresholds for novel species recognition (98.6%, 95–96%, and 70%, respectively). The phylogenetic trees constructed using both the 16S rRNA and 92 core genes (according to the UBCG) derived from the whole-genome sequence also support this conclusion. In summary, strain PAMB 00755T represents a new member of the genus Sphingomonas.

Description of Sphingomonas abietis

Sphingomonas abietis (a.bi.étis. L. gen. n. abietis, of the silver fir, of the botanical genus Abies). The strain forms circular, yellow colonies with a diameter of 2–4 mm when grown on PDA medium at 20°C for 3 days. It exhibits optimal growth on both PDA and R2A media at 20°C, pH 6.0, and 0–1% NaCl. The cells are Gram-negative, non-motile, short rods or ovoid (0.3–1.0 × 0.4–1.2 μm). The strain is catalase- and oxidase-positive. The strain exhibits positive reactions for various substrates as determined by API ZYM strips, including alkaline phosphate, esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase, trypsin, a-chymotrypsin, acid phosphate, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, b-galactosidase, a-glucosidase, b-glucuronidase, and N-acetyl-b-glucosaminidase. Additionally, the API 20NE strips indicated positive reactions for esculine hydrolysis and b-galactosidase. As determined by API 50CH strips, it exhibits positive reactions for salicin, D-cellobiose, maltose, arbutin, esculin ferric citrate, D-lactose, and D-melezitose. The strain contains C18:1ω7c and/or C18:1ω6c (summed feature 8) as the major fatty acids and Q-10 as the respiratory quinone. Its major polar lipids include DPG, PE, SGL, PC, two unknown lipids (L1–L2), four unknown aminolipids (AL1–AL4), PME, and one unknown aminophosphoglycolipid (APGL).

Strain PAMB 00755T is accessible from the Korea Collection for Type Culture (KCTC) with the designation KCTC 92781T and the Guangdong Microbial Culture Collection Center (GDMCC) with the designation GDMCC 1.3779T. The accession numbers for its 16S rRNA and whole-genome sequences are OP964609.1 and CP115174.1, respectively. Based on its distinct phenotypic, genotypic, and chemotaxonomic characteristics, strain PAMB 00755T was classified as a novel species within the genus Sphingomonas. Therefore, we propose the name Sphingomonas abietis sp. nov. for this newly identified species.

Data Availability

The 16S rRNA gene and whole-genome sequence of stain PAMB 00755T have been assigned GenBank accession numbers OP964609.1 and CP115174.1, respectively. This strain is accessible from the Korea Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC 92781T) and the Guangdong Microbial Culture Collection Center (GDMCC 1.3779T).

Author Contributions

JL: responsible for research design, project supervision, and manuscript revision. LJ: performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the original manuscript draft, and revised the manuscript. HC: performed the experiments on the fatty acid profile. HC, YP, DJ, DC, YJ, and JHL: revised the manuscript. CYK: supervised the project. All authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Gwang Joong Kim of Korea Basic Science Institute (KBI, Chuncheon Center) for kindly providing the FE-SEM image. Additionally, we would like to thank Dr. Aharon Oren from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem for his valuable comments and recommendations concerning nomenclature.

This work was funded by a grant from the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB) Research Initiative (KGM5282331), and a grant from the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2020R111A2072308).

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

Abbreviations

KCTC Korean Collection for Type Cultures

KACC Korean Agricultural Culture Collection

GDMCC Guangdong Microbial Culture Collection

ANI average nucleotide identity

dDDH digital DNA-DNA hybridization

PGAP Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline

COG cluster of orthologous groups of proteins

GGDC genome-to-Genome distance calculator

DPG diphosphatidylglycerol

PE phosphatidylethanolamine

SGL sphingoglycolipid

PC phosphatidylcholine

PM phosphatidyl-N-methylethanolamine

APGL aminophosphoglycolipid

Supplemental Materials

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene in strain PAMB 00755T and related species within the genus Sphingomonas. The presented values indicate bootstrap values (>70%) obtained using the neighbor-joining (NJ), maximum likelihood (ML), and minimum parsimony (MP) algorithms. The scale bar represents 0.050 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2023; 33: 1292-1298https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2303.03017

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Phylogenomic tree of genus Sphingomonas based on the up-to-date bacterial core gene set (UBCG) showing the position of strain PAMB 00755T. At the nodes, the gene support index (GSI) is presented on the left side, while bootstrap values are indicated on the right side. The scale bar corresponds to 0.20 substitutions per position.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2023; 33: 1292-1298https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2303.03017

Table 1 . Distinguishing physiological and biochemical characteristics of strain PAMB 00755T and its closely related type strains..

Characteristic123
Isolation sourceKorea firGarden soilaOil port waterb
Colony colorYellowLight yellowYellowb
Colony shapeShort rods or ovoidRodsaShort rodsb
OxidasePositiveWeakaNegativeb
Colony size (mm)2–40.6–1.2a2–3b
Cell size (µm)0.3–1.0 × 0.4–1.20.3–0.5 × 1.3–2.2a1.04–1.90 × 0.52–0.75b
Growth at:
Temperature (°C), range (optimum)4–25 (20)15–35 (30)a20–35 (26)b
Optimum mediaPDA and R2ANA and R2AaLBb
NaCl tolerance (%, w/v), range (optimum)0–1 (0)0–0.5 (0)a0.5–3.0 (0.5)b
pH, range (optimum)4.0–9.0 (6)5.0–7.0 (6.5)a4.0–7.5 (7)b
Assimilation (API 20NE) of:
β-galactosidase+--
Glucose--+
Arabinose--+
API 50CH
Arbutinw-w
Esculin ferric citratew-w
Salicin+++
D-cellobiosew-
Maltosew-w
D-lactosew-w
D-melezitosew-w
API ZYM
Trypsinw+w
β-galactosidase+--
N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase+-+

Strains: 1, Sphingomonas abietis PAMB 00755T; 2, S. chungangi KACC 19292T; 3, S. polyaromaticivorans KCTC 82794T; “+”, positive, “w”, weakly positive, “−“, negative. Unless stated otherwise, all data are from our study. aAkter and Huq, 2020, bLuo, et al., 2012..


Table 2 . Comparisons of cellular fatty acid profiles between strain PAMB 00755T and closely related strains in the genus Sphingomonas..

123
C14:0NDND0.8
C16:06.78.46.2
C17:01.1NDND
C18:00.8ND0.5
C17:1ω6c4.61.6ND
C18:1ω5c1.9ND1.7
C19:0 cyclo ω8cNDND15.6
C12:0-2OH1.3ND0.7
C13:0-2OH0.7NDND
C14:0-2OH6.88.57.3
C15:0-2OH0.6NDND
Summed feature 3a1.1NDND
Summed feature 8a72.181.567.2

Strains: 1, Sphingomonas abietis PAMB 00755T; 2, S. chungangi KACC 19292T; 3, S. polyaromaticivorans KCTC 82794T; “ND” represents not detected. The major components (>10%) are highlighted in bold. All the data presented in this study were obtained from the present study. aSummed features refer to groups of two or three fatty acids that cannot be individually distinguished using gas chromatography with the MIDI System. Summed feature 3 includes C16:1 ω6c and/or C16:1 ω7c, while summed feature 8 includes C18:1 ω7c and/or C18:1 ω6c..


References

  1. Yabuuchi E, Yano I, Oyaizu H, Hashimoto Y, Ezaki T, Yamamoto H. 1990. Proposals of Sphingomonas paucimobilis gen. nov. and comb. nov., Sphingomonas parapaucimobilis sp. nov., Sphingomonas yanoikuyae sp. nov., Sphingomonas adhaesiva sp. nov., Sphingomonas capsulata comb. nov., and two genospecies of the genus Sphingomonas. Microbiol. Immunol. 34: 99-119.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Takeuchi M, Hamana K, Hiraishi A. 2001. Proposal of the genus Sphingomonas sensu stricto and three new genera, Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis, on the basis of phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic analyses. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51: 1405-1417.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Dong L, Li S, Lian WH, Wei QC, Mohamad OAA, Hozzein WN, Ahmed I, Li WJ. 2022. Sphingomonas arenae sp. nov., isolated from desert soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 72. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005195.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Kim H, Chhetri G, Seo T. 2021. Sphingomonas xanthus sp. nov., isolated from beach soil. Curr. Microbiol. 78: 403-410.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Shen L, Liu P, An M, Liang R, He X, Zhao G. 2022. Sphingomonas quercus sp. nov., isolated from Rhizosphere soil of Quercus mongolica. Curr. Microbiol. 79: 122.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Kang M, Chhetri G, Kim J, Kim I, Seo T. 2021. Sphingomonas sabuli sp. nov., a carotenoid-producing bacterium isolated from beach sand. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 71. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004896.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Sheu SY, Yang CC, Sheu DS, Tsai JM, Chen WM. 2020. Sphingomonas lacunae sp. nov., isolated from a freshwater pond. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 70: 5899-5910.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Kim I, Chhetri G, So Y, Jung Y, Park S, Seo T. 2022. Sphingomonas liriopis sp. nov., Sphingomonas donggukensis sp. nov., and Sphingomonas tagetis sp. nov., isolated from Liriope platyphylla fruit, soil, and Tagetes patula roots. Arch. Microbiol. 205: 16.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Madhaiyan M, Saravanan VS, Wirth JS, Alex THH, Kim SJ, Weon HY, et al. 2020. Sphingomonas palmae sp. nov. and Sphingomonas gellani sp. nov., endophytically associated phyllosphere bacteria isolated from economically important crop plants. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 113: 1617-1632.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Jiang L, Seo J, Peng Y, Jeon D, Lee JH, Kim CY, et al. 2023. A nostoxanthin-producing bacterium, Sphingomonas nostoxanthinifaciens sp. nov., alleviates the salt stress of Arabidopsis seedlings by scavenging of reactive oxygen species. Front. Microbiol. 14: 1101150.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Zhang DF, Cui XW, Zhao Z, Zhang AH, Huang JK, Li WJ. 2020. Sphingomonas hominis sp. nov., isolated from hair of a 21-year-old girl. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 113: 1523-1530.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Xue H, Piao CG, Wang XZ, Lin CL, Guo MW, Li Y. 2018. Sphingomonas aeria sp. nov., isolated from air. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 68: 2866-2871.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Heidler von Heilborn D, Reinmuller J, Holzl G, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Woehle C, Marek M, et al. 2021. Sphingomonas aliaeris sp. nov., a new species isolated from pork steak packed under modified atmosphere. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 71. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004973.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Liu Y, Chen T, Cui X, Xu Y, Hu S, Zhao Y, et al. 2022. Sphingomonas radiodurans sp. nov., a novel radiation-resistant bacterium isolated from the north slope of Mount Everest. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 72. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005312.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Zhou XY, Zhang L, Su XJ, Hang P, Hu B, Jiang JD. 2019. Sphingomonas flavalba sp. nov., isolated from a procymidone-contaminated soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 69: 2936-2941.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Chen L, Chen WF, Xu ZL, Li W, Zhang XY, Li WJ, et al. 2018. Sphingomonas oleivorans sp. nov., isolated from oil-contaminated soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 68: 3720-3725.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Feng GD, Wang YH, Zhang XJ, Chen WD, Zhang J, Xiong X, et al. 2019. Sphingomonas lenta sp. nov., a slowly growing bacterium isolated from an abandoned lead-zinc mine. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 69: 2214-2219.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Li Y, Bian DR, Chang JP, Guo LM, Yang XQ. 2020. Sphingomonas populi sp. nov., isolated from bark of Populus x euramericana. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 70: 897-901.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Thaller MC, D'Andrea MM, Marmo P, Civitareale C, Casu F, Migliore L. 2018. Sphingomonas turrisvirgatae sp. nov., an agardegrading species isolated from freshwater. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 68: 2794-2799.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Zhang H, Xu L, Zhang JX, Sun JQ. 2020. Sphingomonas suaedae sp. nov., a chitin-degrading strain isolated from rhizosphere soil of Suaeda salsa. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 70: 3816-3823.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Luo YR, Tian Y, Huang X, Kwon K, Yang SH, Seo HS, et al. 2012. Sphingomonas polyaromaticivorans sp. nov., a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium from an oil port water sample. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 62: 1223-1227.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Jiang L, Peng Y, Seo J, Jeon D, Jo MG, Lee JH, et al. 2022. Subtercola endophyticus sp. nov., a cold-adapted bacterium isolated from Abies koreana. Sci. Rep. 12: 12114.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Jiang L, Pheng S, Lee KC, Kang SW, Jeong JC, Kim CY, et al. 2019. Cohnella abietis sp. nov., isolated from Korean fir (Abies koreana) rhizospheric soil of Halla mountain. J. Microbiol. 57: 953-958.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Senthilraj R, Prasad GS, Janakiraman K. 2016. Sequence-based identification of microbial contaminants in non-parenteral products. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 52: 329-336. d.
    CrossRef
  25. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, Seo H, et al. 2017. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 67: 1613-1617.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  26. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. 2021. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38: 3022-3027.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  27. Rodriguez RL, Gunturu S, Harvey WT, Rossello-Mora R, Tiedje JM, Cole JR, et al. 2018. The Microbial Genomes Atlas (MiGA) webserver: taxonomic and gene diversity analysis of Archaea and Bacteria at the whole genome level. Nucleic Acids Res. 46: W282-W288.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  28. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. 2013. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14: 60.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  29. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. 2005. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J. Bacteriol. 187: 6258-6264.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Na SI, Kim YO, Yoon SH, Ha SM, Baek I, Chun J. 2018. UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J. Microbiol. 56: 280-285.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Sasser M. 2006. Bacterial identification by gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acids methyl esters (GC-FAME). MIDI Technical MIDI Technical Note #101 MIDI Inc, Newark, DE, USA.
  32. Collins M, Shah H, Minnikin D. 1980. A note on the separation of natural mixtures of bacterial menaquinones using reverse phase thin‐layer chromatography. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 48: 277-282.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Lee SA, Kim Y, Sang MK, Song J, Kwon SW, Weon HY. 2019. Chryseolinea soli sp. nov., isolated from soil. J. Microbiol. 57: 122-126.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. 2014. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 64: 346-351.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR, da Costa MS, et al. 2018. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 68: 461-466.
    Pubmed CrossRef