전체메뉴

JMB Journal of Microbiolog and Biotechnology

QR Code QR Code

Research article


References

  1. Singh A, Poshtiban S, Evoy S. 2013. Recent advances in bacteriophage based biosensors for food-borne pathogen detection. Sensors 13: 1763-1786.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  2. Oliver SP, Jayarao BM, Almeida RA. 2005. Foodborne pathogens in milk and the dairy farm environment: food safety and public health implications. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2: 115-129.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Maragkoudakis PA, Mountzouris KC, Psyrras D, Cremonese S, Fischer J, Cantor MD, et al. 2009. Functional properties of novel protective lactic acid bacteria and application in raw chicken meat against Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enteritidis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 130: 219-226.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Rasko DA, Altherr MR, Han CS, Ravel J. 2005. Genomics of the Bacillus cereus group of organisms. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 29: 303-329.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. McLauchlin J. 1997. The identification of Listeria species. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 381: 77-81.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Cowan MM. 1999. Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12: 564-582.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  7. Kim YS, Shin DH. 2003. Researches on the volatile antimicrobial compounds from edible plants and their food application. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 35: 159-165.
  8. Vendrell D, Balcazar JL, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, de Blas I, Girones O, Muzquiz JL. 2006. Lactococcus garvieae in fish: a review. Compar. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 29: 177-198.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Hurst A. 1981. Nisin. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 27: 85-123.
    CrossRef
  10. Motta AS, Flores FS, Souto AA, Brandelli A. 2008. Antibacterial activity of a bacteriocin-like substance produced by Bacillus sp. P34 that targets the bacterial cell envelope. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 93: 275-284.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Sirtori LR, Cladera-Olivera F, Lorenzini DM, Tsai SM, Brandelli A. 2006. Purification and partial characterization of an antimicrobial peptide produced by Bacillus sp. strain P45, a bacterium from the Amazon basin fish Piaractus mesopotamicus. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 52: 357-363.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Abriouel H, Franz CM, Omar NB, Gálvez A. 2011. Diversity and applications of Bacillus bacteriocins. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 5: 201-232.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Perez RH, Perez MTM, Elegado FB. 2015. Bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria: A review of biosynthesis, mode of action, fermentative production, uses, and prospects. Int. J. Philippine Sci. Technol. 8: 61-67.
    CrossRef
  14. Serpil U, Kati H. 2013. Purification and characterization of the bacteriocin Thuricin Bn1 produced by Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki Bn1 isolated from a hazelnut pest. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 23: 167-176.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Le Marrec C, Hyronimus B, Bressollier P, Verneuil B, Urdaci MC. 2000. Biochemical and genetic characterization of coagulin, a new antilisterial bacteriocin in the pediocin family of bacteriocins, produced by Bacillus coagulans I4. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 5213-5220.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  16. Lee H, Churey JJ, Worobo RW. 2009. Biosynthesis and transcriptional analysis of thurincin H, a tandem repeated bacteriocin genetic locus, produced by Bacillus thuringiensis SF361. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 299: 205-213.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Pattnaik P, Kaushik JK, Grover S, Batish VK. 2001. Purification and characterization of a bacteriocin-like compound (lichenin) produced anaerobically by Bacillus licheniformis isolated from water buffalo. J. Appl. Microbiol. I91: 636-645.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Yang EJ, Chang HC. 2007. Characterization of bacteriocin-like substances produced by Bacillus subtilis MJP1. Korean J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 35: 339-346.
  19. Xie J, Zhang R, Shang C, Guo Y. 2009. Isolation and characterization of a bacteriocin produced by an isolated Bacillus subtilis LFB112 that exhibits antimicrobial activity against domestic animal pathogens. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 8: 5611-5619.
  20. Tagg J, Mcgiven AR. 1971. Assay system for bacteriocin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 21: 943-948.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  21. Chin CS, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, et al. 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat. Methods 10: 563-569.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. 1951. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193: 265-275.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Bhunia AK, Johnson MC, Ray B. 1987. Direct detection of an antimicrobial peptide of Pediococcus acidilactici in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J. Ind. Microbiol. 2: 319-322.
    CrossRef
  24. Edman P, Begg G. 1967. A protein sequenator. Eur. J. Biochem. 1: 80-91.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Khochamit N, Siripornadulsil S, Sukon P, Siripornadulsil W. 2015. Antibacterial activity and genotypic-phenotypic characteristics of bacteriocin-producing Bacillus subtilis KKU213: potential as a probiotic strain. Microbiol. Res. 170: 36-50.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Rood JI, Cole ST. 1991. Molecular genetics and pathogenesis of Clostridium perfringens. Microbiol. Rev. 55: 621-648.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  27. Regamey A, Karamata D. 1998. The N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase encoded by the Bacillus subtilis 168 prophage SPβ. Microbiology 144: 885-893.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Stein T. 2008. Whole-cell matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry for rapid identification of bacteriocin/lantibiotic-producing bacteria. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 22: 1146-1152.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Stein T, Borchert S, Conrad B, Feesche J, Hofemeister B, Hofemeister J, et al. 2002. Two different lantibiotic like peptides originate from the ericin gene cluster of Bacillus subtilis A1/3. J. Bacteriol. 184: 1703-1711.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  30. Marx R, Stein T, Entian KD, Glaser SJ. 2001. Structure of the Bacillus subtilis peptide antibiotic subtilosin A determined by 1H-NMR and matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Protein Chem. 20: 501-506.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Paik SH, Chakicherla A, Hansen JN. 1998. Identification and characterization of the structural and transporter genes for, and the chemical and biological properties of sublancin 168, a novel lantibiotic produced by Bacillus subtilis 168. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 23134-23142.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Stein T, Düsterhus S, Stroh A, Entian KD. 2004. Subtilosin production by two Bacillus subtilis subspecies and variance of the sbo-alb cluster. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 2349-2353.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  33. Sutyak KE, Wirawan RE, Aroutcheva AA, Chikindas ML. 2008. Isolation of the Bacillus subtilis antimicrobial peptide subtilosin from the dairy product‐derived Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. J. Appl. Microbiol. 104: 1067-1074.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  34. Rani RP, Anandharaj M, Hema S, Deepika R, Ravindran AD. 2016. Purification of antilisterial Peptide (subtilosin A) from Novel Bacillus tequilensis FR9 and demonstrate their pathogen invasion protection ability using human carcinoma cell line. Front. Microbiol. 7: 1910.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  35. Kwon GH, Lee HA, Kim JH. 2010. A bacteriocin of 5-kDa in size secreted by Bacillus subtilis 168. Korean J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38: 163-167.
  36. Kindoli S, Lee HA, Kim JH. 2012. Properties of a bacteriocin from Bacillus subtilis H27 isolated from Cheonggukjang. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 21: 1745-1751.
    CrossRef
  37. Jack RW, Tagg JR, Ray B. 1995. Bacteriocin of gram-positive bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 59: 171-200.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  38. Lee NK, Yeo IC, Park JW, Kang BS, Hahm YT. 2010. Isolation and characterization of a novel analyte from Bacillus subtilis SC-8 antagonistic to Bacillus cereus. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 110: 298-303.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Kamoun F, Mejdoub H, Aouissaoui H, Reinbolt J, Hammani A, Jaoua S. 2005. Purification, amino acid sequence and characterization of Bacthuricin F4, a new bacteriocin produced by Bacillus thuringiensis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 98: 881-888.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. Chen L, Gu Q, Li P, Li Y, Song D, Yang J. 2018. Purification and Characterization of Plantaricin ZJ316, a Novel Bacteriocin against Listeria monocytogenes from Lactobacillus plantarum ZJ316. J. Food Protect. 81: 1929-1935.
    Pubmed CrossRef

Article

Research article

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022; 32(11): 1462-1470

Published online November 28, 2022 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2208.08006

Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Identification and Characterization of a Bacteriocin from the Newly Isolated Bacillus subtilis HD15 with Inhibitory Effects against Bacillus cereus

Sung Wook Hong2, Jong-Hui Kim1, Hyun A Cha1, Kun Sub Chung3, Hyo Ju Bae1, Won Seo Park1, Jun-Sang Ham1, Beom-Young Park1, and Mi-Hwa Oh1*

1National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea
2Technology Innovation Research Division, World Institute of Kimchi, Gwangju 61755, Republic of Korea
3Division of Biological Science and Technology, Yonsei University, Wonju 26493, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to:MiHwa Oh,       moh@korea.kr

Received: August 5, 2022; Revised: October 11, 2022; Accepted: October 11, 2022

Abstract

Natural antimicrobial substances are needed as alternatives to synthetic antimicrobials to protect against foodborne pathogens. In this study, a bacteriocin-producing bacterium, Bacillus subtilis HD15, was isolated from doenjang, a traditional Korean fermented soybean paste. We sequenced the complete genome of B. subtilis HD15. This genome size was 4,173,431 bp with a G + C content of of 43.58%, 4,305 genes, and 4,222 protein-coding genes with predicted functions, including a subtilosin A gene cluster. The bacteriocin was purified by ammonium sulfate precipitation, Diethylaminoethanol-Sepharose chromatography, and Sephacryl gel filtration, with 12.4-fold purification and 26.2% yield, respectively. The purified protein had a molecular weight of 3.6 kDa. The N-terminal amino acid sequence showed the highest similarity to Bacillus subtilis 168 subtilosin A (78%) but only 68% similarity to B. tequilensis subtilosin proteins, indicating that the antimicrobial substance isolated from B. subtilis HD15 is a novel bacteriocin related to subtilosin A. The purified protein from B. subtilis HD15 exhibited high antimicrobial activity against Listeria monocytogenes and Bacillus cereus. It showed stable activity in the range 0–70°C and pH 2–10 and was completely inhibited by protease, proteinase K, and pronase E treatment, suggesting that it is a proteinaceous substance. These findings support the potential industrial applications of the novel bacteriocin purified from B. subtilis HD15.

Keywords: Bacteriocin, Bacillus subtilis, antimicrobial activity, subtilosin

Introduction

Foodborne pathogens are a major public health threat and an economic burden in the food industry and society in general [1]. Bacillus cereus and Listeria monocytogenes are ubiquitous microorganisms in the natural environment [2, 3] and are well-known foodborne pathogens that cause emesis and diarrhea [4]. L. monocytogenes causes listeriosis, a significant health hazard to newborns, pregnant women, and elderly individuals [5].

Preservatives, either synthetic or natural, are added to food to prevent spoilage and poisoning by foodborne spoilage and pathogenic bacteria. Recently, there has been a trend toward avoiding synthetic preservatives to address safety concerns [6] and to meet increasing consumer demand for natural preservatives, including organic acids, plant extracts, and antimicrobial substances produced by microorganisms, such as proteins and peptides [7]. These substances can be degraded by digestive enzymes, which are later absorbed by the body [8]. For example, the bacteriocin nisin produced by Lactococcus lactis was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 1998 and has since been used as a preservative in processed cheese [9].

Antimicrobial substances produced by Bacillus species have more diverse characteristics and a broader range of activities than those of substances produced by lactic acid bacteria [10, 11]. However, the current classification system for antimicrobial peptides generated by ribosomal synthesis is based solely on bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria [12]. These can be categorized into four classes. Class I comprises small peptides (<5 kDa) containing unusual amino acids (e.g., lactionine and 3-methyllanthionine), including subtilin, sublancin 168, and subtilosin A, which are generated as polypeptides that undergo post-translational modifications [12-14]. Class II (non-lantibiotic) bacteriocins are relatively small (<10 kDa), heat-stable compounds that include pediocin-like peptides (class IIa), two-peptide complexes (class IIb), circular bacteriocins (class IIc), and non-pediocin-like bacteriocins (class IId), which are synthesized on ribosomes and do not undergo post-translational modifications. Examples of class II bacteriocins include coagulin, thurincin H, and lichenin [15, 16, 17]. Class III antimicrobials are bacteriocins that have a molecular weight greater than 30 kDa and are heat-sensitive, such as megacin A. Class IV bacteriocins are complex peptides containing essential lipid or carbohydrate moieties for their activity [12-14].

Many antimicrobial peptides have not been classified owing to a lack of DNA and protein sequence information; these are referred to as bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances [12]. Those produced by B. subtilis LFB112 disrupt both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, whereas substances produced by B. subtilis MJP1 have antimicrobial activity against gram-positive bacteria and fungi [18]. Given their broad range of activities, antimicrobial substances produced by Bacillus species have applications in many industries, in addition to the food industry [19].

Korean traditional fermented foods, including doenjang, cheonggukjang, gochujang, and soybean, are good resources for isolating beneficial microorganisms harboring antimicrobial properties to be used as starter cultures. This study screened four traditional fermented food products for the presence of bacteriocin-producing microorganisms capable of killing the bacteria Bacillus cereus. In addition, growth inhibition of B. cereus using HD15 present in the Korean fermented food, doenjang, was investigated. The antimicrobial substance produced by HD15 was purified and characterized to assess its value as a novel bio-preservative for foods.

Materials and Methods

Isolation and Culture of Microorganisms

Microorganisms were isolated from traditionally produced doenjang (a traditional Korean fermented soybean paste), meju (a brick of dried fermented soybeans), ganjang (a Korean soy sauce made from fermented soybeans), and cheonggukjang (a traditional Korean fermented soybean). Separated fractions of each sample were mixed with sterile 0.85% NaCl solution at a 1:9 ratio for 10 min with a homogenizer (Seward Laboratory Systems, USA) and diluted 10-fold in sterile 0.85% NaCl. A 100 μl volume of the suspension was smeared on a tryptic soy agar plate (TSA; Difco, USA) and incubated at 37°C for 14 h.

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Effects

Antimicrobial activity against several gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria was assessed using the agar well diffusion method [20], with some modifications. Cultures were incubated in tryptic soy medium at 37°C for 60 h. Cell-free supernatants were prepared by centrifugation (3,800 ×g, 4°C, 30 min) and used as an antagonistic substance. Each pathogen at 7.0 log CFU/ml was spread on a TSA plate. An 8-mm-diameter well was created using a cork borer on the agar plate, and 50 μl of the cell-free supernatant was added to the wells. The plates were left undisturbed for a few hours to allow the supernatant to diffuse into the agar and then cultured at 37°C for 18 h. The diameter of the resultant growth inhibition zone was measured as a measure of antimicrobial activity.

PCR Amplification and Sequencing of the 16S rRNA and rpoB Genes

The nearly full-length 16S rRNA from the selected genomic DNA was amplified by PCR with combinations of primers (338R, GCTGCCTCCCGTAGGAGT; 926F, AAACTCAAAGGAATTGACGG; 1088R, GCTCGTTGC GGGACTTAACC; and 1492R, GGATACCTTGTTACGACTT). To amplify the rpoB gene, the primers rpoB1206 (ATC GAA ACG CCT GAA GGT CCA AAC AT) and rpoBR3202 (ACA CCC TTG TTA CCG TGA CGA CC) were used. The two genes were amplified under the same PCR conditions with the following cycling program: 95°C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 45 s, 52°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 1 min; and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. After the PCR products were separated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, samples were purified using the Genomic DNA Clean & Concentrator-10 Kit (Zymo Research, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The purified PCR product was sequenced on an ABI PRISM 3730XL Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA). All 16S rRNA and rpoB gene sequences were assembled to obtain the full-length sequences, which were searched against the NCBI GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) for taxonomic classification.

Genome Sequencing and Annotation

Genomic DNA was extracted using a Wizard Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Promega, USA). The genome of strain HD15 was subjected to de novo sequencing using the Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) RS II Single-molecule Real-time (SMRT) Cell Sequencing Technology (Macrogen, Korea). De novo assembly was performed using RS HGAP assembly version 3.0 [21]. The genome sequence was annotated using the RAST server and BlastKOALA (KEGG Orthology and Links Annotation). Gene prediction was carried out using Prodigal, and the predicted proteins were searched for similarity against the UniProt protein database using Blastp, followed by pathway identification using the KEGG server.

Purification of Bacteriocins

The selected isolate was cultured in 500 ml of TSB at 1% (v/v) for 60 h at 37°C with shaking. The culture was centrifuged at 10,000 ×g for 30 min, and the supernatant was collected for the purification of the bacteriocin. Ammonium sulfate (Junsei Chemical Co., Japan) was added to the culture supernatant at 80% saturation, followed by incubation at 4°C for 12 h. After centrifugation, the precipitate was dissolved in 10 mM Tris-HCl and the solution was dialyzed (molecular weight cut-off: 6–8 kDa; Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) at 4°C for 12 h using 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8). All purification steps were performed at 4°C to prevent protein denaturation.

A 2.5 cm × 40 cm anion-exchange Diethylaminoethyl-Sepharose Fast-Flow Column (Pharmacia Biotech, Sweden) was equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-HCl, and the ammonium sulfate-precipitated bacteriocin was injected into the column along with the buffer at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. A linear gradient of 0–1 M NaCl in buffer was used for elution, and 5 ml fractions were collected every minute. The protein content in each fraction was measured on a spectrometer at a wavelength of 280 nm, and fractions with antimicrobial activity were combined and lyophilized. Bacteriocin was fractionated by ion-exchange chromatography, and gel chromatography was performed using a 1.5 cm × 96 cm Sephacryl S-200HR Column (Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer and eluted at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. The protein content in each 3 ml fraction was measured using a spectrometer at a wavelength of 280 nm, and fractions with antimicrobial activity were combined and lyophilized.

Quantification of Protein Content in the Bacteriocin Solution

The protein content in the bacteriocin solution was measured using the modified Lowry method [22]. A 50 μl volume of bacteriocin was mixed with 550 μl of biuret reagent (0.75 mM cupric sulfate and 94 mM sodium hydroxide) and incubated for 10 min at 25°C. A 25 μl volume of Folin–Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was then added, followed by incubation for 30 min at 25°C. Absorbance was measured at 725 nm using a VersaMax ELISA Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices, USA), and a standard curve was constructed using bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich). Antimicrobial activity was measured as arbitrary units per milliliter of purified microbial culture using serial 2-fold dilutions of the antimicrobial substance. The reciprocal of the maximum dilution that resulted in a transparent zone was considered the activity in AU. AU/mL was calculated by multiplying AU by the dilution factor.

Measurement of Molecular Weight of Bacteriocin

The molecular weight of bacteriocin was determined by tricine sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE; Bio-Rad, USA) at 100 V for 5 h on a 20% polyacrylamide gel with an ultra-low-range molecular weight marker (1,060–26,600 Da; Sigma-Aldrich), followed by silver staining (Amersham Biosciences, Sweden). Direct detection was then performed to determine whether the protein bands corresponded to bacteriocin [23].

N-Terminal Amino Acid Sequencing

Purified bacteriocin was separated by tricine-SDS-PAGE and transferred at 17 V for 40 min to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Bio-Rad) equilibrated in buffer composed of 100 ml of 10× transfer buffer (30.3 g of Tris, 144.2 g of glycine, and 1 L of distilled water, pH 8.3), 200 ml of methanol, and 700 ml of distilled water. The membrane was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue, destained with methanol, and then dried to confirm bacteriocin staining. The sequential identification of peptides using a protein/peptide sequencer (model 494; Applied Biosystems) was performed at the Korea Basic Science Institute in Korea, according to the method described by Edman and Begg [24].

Bacteriocin Stability

To evaluate the pH stability of the antimicrobial substance, the buffers were prepared with 0.1 M glycine-HCl buffer (pH between 2 and 4), 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer (pH between 4 and 6), 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH between 6 and 8), and 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH between 8 and 10). The antimicrobial substance was mixed with buffer at a ratio of 1:15 and incubated at 37°C for 12 h, and relative antimicrobial activity was measured. To evaluate temperature stability, purified bacteriocin was incubated at 0°C, 20°C, 40°C, 60°C, 70°C, 80°C, or 90°C for 12 h, and at 100°C for 1 h. Relative antimicrobial activity was assessed using the agar well diffusion method, and the zone of inhibition was measured in millimeters. To assess the effect of various enzymes on antimicrobial activity, lysozyme (E.C. 3.2.1.17), α-amylase (E.C. 3.2.1.1), lipase (E.C. 3.1.1.3), protease (E.C. 3.4.24.31), and proteinase K (E.C. 3.4.21.64) (all from Sigma-Aldrich) and pronase E (E.C. 3.4.24.4; Merck Millipore, USA) were prepared in sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at a final concentration of 4 mg/ml. Purified bacteriocin was mixed with each enzyme at 2 mg/ml and incubated at 37°C for 30 min, and the relative antimicrobial activity was measured.

Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers

The subtilosin gene cluster nucleotide sequence reported here has been deposited in the EMBL nucleotide sequence database under the accession number AJ430547. This whole-genome shotgun project of B. subtilis HD15 was deposited in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession no. CP080508.

Results and Discussion

Isolation and Identification of Isolates with Antimicrobial Activity

A total of 900 strains were isolated from various fermented soybean food products. Colonies that grew on TSA were tested for antimicrobial activity against B. cereus. The isolate exhibiting the highest antimicrobial activity (inhibitory zone, 17.02 ± 1.04 mm) was selected for further analyses (Table 1). We constructed two separate phylogenetic trees based on 16S rRNA and partial rpoB gene sequences. The isolate shared 100% identity with Bacillus tequilensis based on full-length 16S rDNA sequences (Fig. 1A). The rpoB gene showed a sequence similarity of 97% with the partial rpoB genes of B. tequilensis and B. subtilis subsp. subtilis. The constructed tree had high bootstrap values (Fig. 1B). Isolate HD15 and the position of these bacteria in the phylogenetic tree confirmed that the species are synonymous. The isolate was designated B. subtilis HD15 and was deposited in the Korea Culture Center of Microorganisms (KCCM) under the accession number KCCM 91944.

Table 1 . Antibacterial activity of bacterial isolates from various types of fermented soybean foods using agar plate diffusion experiment..

IsolatesInhibiton zone (mm)

Diameter averaged valueStandard deviation
HC3110.310.21
HD1014.160.58
HD1517.021.04
KC1211.970.61
KR1413.420.24

Isolates were cultured in TSB at 37°C for 24 h, and culture supernatants were tested for antimicrobial activity against B. cereus by the well diffusion method. HC and KC, HD, and KR were isolated from traditionally produced cheonggukjang, doenjang, and meju, respectively..



Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of isolate HD15 based on 16S rRNA (A) and rpoB (B) gene homology. Trees were constructed by the minimum evolution method using the MEGA 4 package. The number on each branch indicates the percentage of 1,000 replicates that includes the branch. Sequences determined in this study are shown in bold. Scale bar: 0.005 substitutions per site using the Jukes–Cantor model.

General Genomic Features of Bacillus subtilis HD15

To investigate antibacterial factors, we conducted whole genome sequencing of B. subtilis HD15. Sequencing data were generated using the PacBio RS II SMRT cell sequencing technology. The general features of complete genome were 4,173,431 bp with a G + C content of 43.58%. The genome contained 4,305 CDSs, 86 tRNA genes, and 30 rRNA genes(data not shown). We also detected various genes related to antibacterial activity in the genome of B. subtilis HD15. We used a complete operon composed of eight genes to produce mature subtilosin A. It included sboA, which encodes the subtilosin prepeptide structural gene, and a seven-gene operon (albABCDEFG), which encodes the processing and immune genes for the antilisterial bacteriocin [25]. This leads to the complete expression of subtilosin. Furthermore, there was also an upstream gene that encodes a protein homologous to the bacteriocin UviB (uviB) (Fig. 2 and Table 2). The role of UviB, a second product of the uviAB operon, is currently undetermined. The UviB gene has been reported in the UV-inducible bacteriocin operon (uviA-uviB-bcn5) in the study of Rood and Cole [26]. However, comparing sequences with other proteins showed that UviB is similar to BhlA, a product of Bacillus subtilis phage SPβ, and the holin-protein [27].

Table 2 . Bacteriocin related genes present in Bacillus subtilis HD15..

Gene nameGene locus numberDescription
sboAQYM62143Subtilosin A
albAQYM62145Antilisterial bacteriocin subtilosin biosynthesis protein AlbA
albBQYM62146Antilisterial bacteriocin subtilosin biosynthesis protein AlbB
albCPutative ABC transporter ATP-binding protein AlbC
albDQYM62148Antilisterial bacteriocin subtilosin biosynthesis protein AlbD
albEQYM62657Antilisterial bacteriocin subtilosin biosynthesis protein AlbE
albFPutative zinc protease AlbF
albGQYM62150Antilisterial bacteriocin subtilosin biosynthesis protein AlbG
uviBBacteriocin UviB


Figure 2. Genomic features of the chromosome of B. subtilis HD15. A, Circular genome maps of B. subtilis HD15 chromosome; B, Proportion of genes enriched in the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) categories.

Purification of Bacteriocins

Fractions 34–55 obtained by ion exchange chromatography showing antimicrobial activity were pooled and subjected to gel chromatography using Sephacryl. Fractions 49–61 showing antimicrobial activity were pooled and used as purified bacteriocin (Fig. 3A). Bacteriocin purification results are summarized in Table 3, showing 12.4-fold purification and a 26.2% yield. The molecular weight of the purified bacteriocin, determined by tricine SDS-PAGE, was 3.6 kDa. A single band corresponding to the purified bacteriocin was detected (Fig. 3B). Additionally, a clear zone surrounding the purified bacteriocin (Fig. 3C) was observed against B. cereus KCCM 12667.

Table 3 . Summary of purification of bacteriocin from Bacillus subtilis HD15..

StepsTotal activity (AU)Total protein (mg)Specific activity (AU/mg)Purification (fold)Yield (%)
Culture supernatant40,0001,20033.31100
Ammonium sulfate precipitation20,600110.5186.45.651.5
Diethylaminoethyl-sepharose FF column chromatography15,20051.2296.98.938.0
Sephacryl S-200HR column chromatography10,50025.4413.412.426.2


Figure 3. Analysis of antibacterial peptides from B. subtilis HD15. A, Chromatogram profile of gel filtration chromatography of bacteriocin, measured at 280 nm; B, Tricine SDS-PAGE analysis of purified bacteriocin; C, Antibacterial activity of purified bacteriocin as determined by the agar well diffusion test against Bacillus cereus KCCM 12667. Lane M, ultralow range molecular weight marker; lane AS, antimicrobial substance precipitated by 20–60% ammonium sulfate; lane IEX, antimicrobial substance eluted by Diethylaminoethyl-Sepharose FF ion exchange chromatography; lane GF, purified antimicrobial substance eluted by Sephacryl S-200HR.

Antimicrobial substances produced by B. subtilis with molecular weights of approximately 3.5 kDa include subtilin, subtilosin A, sublancin 168, and ericin S, which are class I bacteriocins. Subtilin is a pentacyclic peptide with a molecular weight of 3.3 kDa, and ericin S with a molecular weight of 3.4 kDa is highly similar to subtilin, differing by only four amino acid residues [28, 29]. Subtilosin has a molecular weight of 3.4 kDa and assumes a macrocyclic form following posttranslational modification [30]. Sublancin 168 is a 3.9-kDa glycopeptide that contains a lanthionine linked by two disulfide bonds [31]. Based on peptide size, the enzyme purified from B. subtilis HD15 was presumed to be a class I bacteriocin.

Genetic Organization and Amino Acid Sequence Analysis of Purified Bacteriocins

The 43 amino acid sequence predicted from sboA of the bacteriocin from B. subtilis HD15 was Met-Lys-Lys-Ala-Val-Ile-Val-Glu-Asn-Lys-Gly-Cys-Ala-Thr-Cys-Ser-Ile-Gly-Ala-Ala-Cys-Leu-Val-Asp-Gly-Pro-Ile-Pro-Asp-Phe-Glu-Ile-Ala-Gly-Ala-Thr-Gly-Leu-Phe-Gly-Leu-Trp-Gly (Fig. 4A and Fig. 4B). A search of bacteriocin peptide databases revealed similarity with previously identified subtilosin A. The bacteriocin produced by B. subtilis HD15 showed 100% similarity to subtilosin A produced by five Bacillus species, including B. cereus MBGJa3 (GenBank Accession No. CP026523), B. subtilis 168 (GenBank Accession No. AL009126), B. subtilis JCL16 (GenBank Accession No. NZ_CP054177), B. amyloliquefaciens HB9 (GenBank Accession No. MT490213), B. tequilensis EA-CB0015 (GenBank Accession No. NZ_CP048852), and B. atrophaeus 1942 (GenBank Accession No. NC_014639, 93% similarity to subtilosin A).

Figure 4. Comparison of Sbo alleles of seven Bacillus species. A, Sequence of the subtilosin A-encoding gene Sbo; B, Alignment of the derived amino acid sequences of the putative Sbo. Differences between the seven alleles are indicated by shading; C. Multiple sequence alignment of the N-terminal amino acid sequence of B. subtilis HD15.

The N-terminal amino acid sequence of the purified bacteriocin from B. subtilis HD15 was Ser-Ile-Gly-Ala-Cys-Leu-Val-Asp-Gly-Pro-Ile-Pro-Val-Ile-Glu-Gly, and the amino acid residues were experimentally confirmed using a protein/peptide sequencer. The N-terminus of the purified bacteriocin was used to generate a multiple sequence alignment with subtilosin sequences from the genus Bacillus in the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (Fig. 4C). Our purified bacteriocin sequence showed 78% and 68% similarity to those of subtilosin A (E.C. 3.4.21.62) from B. subtilis 168 (GenBank Accession No. 1109186A) and B. tequilensis (GenBank Accession No. WP_024713849.1). It was also 72.2% identical to subtilosin A from B. subtilis (GenBank Accession No. 1PXQ_A). Subtilosin production has been documented in several B. subtilis subspecies as well as in the closely related species B. atrophaeus [32] and B. amyloliquefaciens [33]. In addition, subtilosin A from B. subtilis was similar to the N-terminal amino acid sequence of subtilosin A produced by Bacillus species [34].

Antimicrobial Activity Spectrum

The antimicrobial activities of B. subtilis HD15 bacteriocin against pathogenic bacteria are summarized in Table 4. Measurement of antimicrobial activity by the well diffusion method showed strong inhibition against gram-positive bacteria, such as B. cereus and L. monocytogenes, and no activity against gram-negative bacteria or Staphylococcus aureus, consistent with previous results for a bacteriocin from B. subtilis 168 [35].

Table 4 . Inhibitory spectrum of bacteriocin from Bacillus subtilis HD15..

MicroorganismIndicator speciesAntibacterial activity
Gram-positive bacteriaBacillus cereus KCCM 40152+++
Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 15313+++
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923
Gram-negative bacteriaCronobacter sakazakii KCTC2949
Escherichia coli O157:H7 ATCC 43894
Pseudomonas aeruginosa KCCM 12539
Salmonella choleraesuis KCCM 40736
Salmonella enteritidis CCARM 8206
Shigella sonnei KCCM 41282
Shigella flexneri KCCM 11937
Vibrio parahaemolyticus KCCM 11965
Vibrio vulnificus ATCC 29306

+++, Greater than 15 mm; −, no inhibition zone..



Antimicrobial substances produced by gram-positive bacteria generally exhibit bacteriostatic activity. An antimicrobial substance (1,600 AU/ml) produced by B. subtilis H27 isolated from fermented soybean paste was toxic to L. monocytogenes after 12 h of treatment [36]. B. subtilis W42 isolated from cheonggukjang showed strong antimicrobial activity against B. cereus and L. monocytogenes; however, it showed no toxicity towards gram-negative bacteria [37]. Bacteriocins produced by most Bacillus species have no effect on gram-negative bacteria and inhibit only gram-positive species [38].

Bacteriocin Stability

The bacteriocin in this study maintained 100% of its antimicrobial activity at pH 5–7; however, the activity decreased to 50% at pH 2, 80% at pH 3 to 9, and 30% at pH 10 (Table 5). It was previously reported that the activity of the antimicrobial substance produced by B. subtilis SC-8 was lower at pH 3 than at pH 4–10 [38]. Bacthuricin F4 produced by Bacillus thuringiensis showed 40% residual antimicrobial activity at pH 8, 10% at pH 9, and approximately 80% at pH 3 [38]. The buffer itself did not inhibit B. cereus growth (data not shown).

Table 5 . Effect of pH, heat, and enzyme treatment on the antibacterial activity of Bacillus subtilis HD15..

TreatmentRelative activity (%)
pH
250
380
495
5100
6100
7100
895
980
1030
Heat (temperature, °C)
50100
6095
7070
8020
900
Enzymes
α-Amylase100
Lipase100
Protease0
Proteinase K0
Pronase E0


To measure temperature stability, purified bacteriocin was incubated at temperatures ranging from 0°C to 80°C for 12 h or at 100°C for 1 h before measuring antimicrobial activity. The activity was 100% after incubation at 0–50°C for 12 h but decreased to 70% after incubation at 70°C for 12 h. These results demonstrate that B. subtilis HD15 bacteriocin is stable over a range of temperatures. In contrast, the antimicrobial activity of a substance produced by B. subtilis SC-8 against B. cereus was lost after incubation at 80°C or 100°C for 1 h, and the activity against L. monocytogenes decreased by 50% after incubation at 60–80°C for 15 min and was reduced to 20% after incubation at 100°C for 10 min [36, 39]. The bacteriocin produced by B. subtilis HD15 was stable at extreme temperatures and pH, with more than 70% activity remaining after 12 h at 70°C and over a pH range between 3 and 9. This suggests that it can be adapted to a variety of applications, including but not limited to food preservation.

Since treatment with amylase and lipase had no effect on antibacterial activity (Table 5), we presumed that bacteriocin does not possess carbohydrate or lipid moieties or they are not essential for enzymatic activity. However, the antimicrobial activity of bacteriocin was lost upon exposure to proteolytic enzymes, such as protease, proteinase K, and pronase E (Table 5), confirming that the purified substance was proteinaceous [40]. The protein and peptide components of antibacterial bacteriocins produced by microorganisms is can be degraded by proteolytic enzymes in the digestive system. Based on these characteristics, we propose that bacteriocin purified from B. subtilis HD15 can be used as a natural food or feed preservative.

We obtained an isolate with high antimicrobial activity against B. cereus from doenjang. Molecular analysis revealed that the isolate was B. subtilis HD15. Purified bacteriocin exhibited excellent antimicrobial activity against both L. monocytogenes and B. cereus. The bacteriocin was stable up to 70°C and in the pH range of 2–10. The antimicrobial activity of bacteriocin was lost upon exposure to proteolytic enzymes, confirming its proteinaceous nature. Based on these characteristics, we propose that bacteriocin purified from B. subtilis HD15 is a promising bio-preservative and natural alternative to chemical preservatives in the food industry.

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agricultural Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ009221012014)” Rural Development Administration and was financially supported by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) and Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) through the National Innovation Cluster R&D program(P0015309), Republic of Korea.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Phylogenetic analysis of isolate HD15 based on 16S rRNA (A) and rpoB (B) gene homology. Trees were constructed by the minimum evolution method using the MEGA 4 package. The number on each branch indicates the percentage of 1,000 replicates that includes the branch. Sequences determined in this study are shown in bold. Scale bar: 0.005 substitutions per site using the Jukes–Cantor model.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2022; 32: 1462-1470https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2208.08006

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Genomic features of the chromosome of B. subtilis HD15. A, Circular genome maps of B. subtilis HD15 chromosome; B, Proportion of genes enriched in the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) categories.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2022; 32: 1462-1470https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2208.08006

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Analysis of antibacterial peptides from B. subtilis HD15. A, Chromatogram profile of gel filtration chromatography of bacteriocin, measured at 280 nm; B, Tricine SDS-PAGE analysis of purified bacteriocin; C, Antibacterial activity of purified bacteriocin as determined by the agar well diffusion test against Bacillus cereus KCCM 12667. Lane M, ultralow range molecular weight marker; lane AS, antimicrobial substance precipitated by 20–60% ammonium sulfate; lane IEX, antimicrobial substance eluted by Diethylaminoethyl-Sepharose FF ion exchange chromatography; lane GF, purified antimicrobial substance eluted by Sephacryl S-200HR.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2022; 32: 1462-1470https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2208.08006

Fig 4.

Figure 4.Comparison of Sbo alleles of seven Bacillus species. A, Sequence of the subtilosin A-encoding gene Sbo; B, Alignment of the derived amino acid sequences of the putative Sbo. Differences between the seven alleles are indicated by shading; C. Multiple sequence alignment of the N-terminal amino acid sequence of B. subtilis HD15.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2022; 32: 1462-1470https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2208.08006

Table 1 . Antibacterial activity of bacterial isolates from various types of fermented soybean foods using agar plate diffusion experiment..

IsolatesInhibiton zone (mm)

Diameter averaged valueStandard deviation
HC3110.310.21
HD1014.160.58
HD1517.021.04
KC1211.970.61
KR1413.420.24

Isolates were cultured in TSB at 37°C for 24 h, and culture supernatants were tested for antimicrobial activity against B. cereus by the well diffusion method. HC and KC, HD, and KR were isolated from traditionally produced cheonggukjang, doenjang, and meju, respectively..


Table 2 . Bacteriocin related genes present in Bacillus subtilis HD15..

Gene nameGene locus numberDescription
sboAQYM62143Subtilosin A
albAQYM62145Antilisterial bacteriocin subtilosin biosynthesis protein AlbA
albBQYM62146Antilisterial bacteriocin subtilosin biosynthesis protein AlbB
albCPutative ABC transporter ATP-binding protein AlbC
albDQYM62148Antilisterial bacteriocin subtilosin biosynthesis protein AlbD
albEQYM62657Antilisterial bacteriocin subtilosin biosynthesis protein AlbE
albFPutative zinc protease AlbF
albGQYM62150Antilisterial bacteriocin subtilosin biosynthesis protein AlbG
uviBBacteriocin UviB

Table 3 . Summary of purification of bacteriocin from Bacillus subtilis HD15..

StepsTotal activity (AU)Total protein (mg)Specific activity (AU/mg)Purification (fold)Yield (%)
Culture supernatant40,0001,20033.31100
Ammonium sulfate precipitation20,600110.5186.45.651.5
Diethylaminoethyl-sepharose FF column chromatography15,20051.2296.98.938.0
Sephacryl S-200HR column chromatography10,50025.4413.412.426.2

Table 4 . Inhibitory spectrum of bacteriocin from Bacillus subtilis HD15..

MicroorganismIndicator speciesAntibacterial activity
Gram-positive bacteriaBacillus cereus KCCM 40152+++
Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 15313+++
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923
Gram-negative bacteriaCronobacter sakazakii KCTC2949
Escherichia coli O157:H7 ATCC 43894
Pseudomonas aeruginosa KCCM 12539
Salmonella choleraesuis KCCM 40736
Salmonella enteritidis CCARM 8206
Shigella sonnei KCCM 41282
Shigella flexneri KCCM 11937
Vibrio parahaemolyticus KCCM 11965
Vibrio vulnificus ATCC 29306

+++, Greater than 15 mm; −, no inhibition zone..


Table 5 . Effect of pH, heat, and enzyme treatment on the antibacterial activity of Bacillus subtilis HD15..

TreatmentRelative activity (%)
pH
250
380
495
5100
6100
7100
895
980
1030
Heat (temperature, °C)
50100
6095
7070
8020
900
Enzymes
α-Amylase100
Lipase100
Protease0
Proteinase K0
Pronase E0

References

  1. Singh A, Poshtiban S, Evoy S. 2013. Recent advances in bacteriophage based biosensors for food-borne pathogen detection. Sensors 13: 1763-1786.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  2. Oliver SP, Jayarao BM, Almeida RA. 2005. Foodborne pathogens in milk and the dairy farm environment: food safety and public health implications. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2: 115-129.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Maragkoudakis PA, Mountzouris KC, Psyrras D, Cremonese S, Fischer J, Cantor MD, et al. 2009. Functional properties of novel protective lactic acid bacteria and application in raw chicken meat against Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enteritidis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 130: 219-226.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Rasko DA, Altherr MR, Han CS, Ravel J. 2005. Genomics of the Bacillus cereus group of organisms. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 29: 303-329.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. McLauchlin J. 1997. The identification of Listeria species. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 381: 77-81.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Cowan MM. 1999. Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12: 564-582.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Kim YS, Shin DH. 2003. Researches on the volatile antimicrobial compounds from edible plants and their food application. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 35: 159-165.
  8. Vendrell D, Balcazar JL, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, de Blas I, Girones O, Muzquiz JL. 2006. Lactococcus garvieae in fish: a review. Compar. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 29: 177-198.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Hurst A. 1981. Nisin. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 27: 85-123.
    CrossRef
  10. Motta AS, Flores FS, Souto AA, Brandelli A. 2008. Antibacterial activity of a bacteriocin-like substance produced by Bacillus sp. P34 that targets the bacterial cell envelope. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 93: 275-284.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Sirtori LR, Cladera-Olivera F, Lorenzini DM, Tsai SM, Brandelli A. 2006. Purification and partial characterization of an antimicrobial peptide produced by Bacillus sp. strain P45, a bacterium from the Amazon basin fish Piaractus mesopotamicus. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 52: 357-363.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Abriouel H, Franz CM, Omar NB, Gálvez A. 2011. Diversity and applications of Bacillus bacteriocins. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 5: 201-232.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Perez RH, Perez MTM, Elegado FB. 2015. Bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria: A review of biosynthesis, mode of action, fermentative production, uses, and prospects. Int. J. Philippine Sci. Technol. 8: 61-67.
    CrossRef
  14. Serpil U, Kati H. 2013. Purification and characterization of the bacteriocin Thuricin Bn1 produced by Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki Bn1 isolated from a hazelnut pest. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 23: 167-176.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Le Marrec C, Hyronimus B, Bressollier P, Verneuil B, Urdaci MC. 2000. Biochemical and genetic characterization of coagulin, a new antilisterial bacteriocin in the pediocin family of bacteriocins, produced by Bacillus coagulans I4. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 5213-5220.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. Lee H, Churey JJ, Worobo RW. 2009. Biosynthesis and transcriptional analysis of thurincin H, a tandem repeated bacteriocin genetic locus, produced by Bacillus thuringiensis SF361. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 299: 205-213.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Pattnaik P, Kaushik JK, Grover S, Batish VK. 2001. Purification and characterization of a bacteriocin-like compound (lichenin) produced anaerobically by Bacillus licheniformis isolated from water buffalo. J. Appl. Microbiol. I91: 636-645.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Yang EJ, Chang HC. 2007. Characterization of bacteriocin-like substances produced by Bacillus subtilis MJP1. Korean J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 35: 339-346.
  19. Xie J, Zhang R, Shang C, Guo Y. 2009. Isolation and characterization of a bacteriocin produced by an isolated Bacillus subtilis LFB112 that exhibits antimicrobial activity against domestic animal pathogens. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 8: 5611-5619.
  20. Tagg J, Mcgiven AR. 1971. Assay system for bacteriocin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 21: 943-948.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  21. Chin CS, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, et al. 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat. Methods 10: 563-569.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. 1951. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193: 265-275.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Bhunia AK, Johnson MC, Ray B. 1987. Direct detection of an antimicrobial peptide of Pediococcus acidilactici in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J. Ind. Microbiol. 2: 319-322.
    CrossRef
  24. Edman P, Begg G. 1967. A protein sequenator. Eur. J. Biochem. 1: 80-91.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Khochamit N, Siripornadulsil S, Sukon P, Siripornadulsil W. 2015. Antibacterial activity and genotypic-phenotypic characteristics of bacteriocin-producing Bacillus subtilis KKU213: potential as a probiotic strain. Microbiol. Res. 170: 36-50.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Rood JI, Cole ST. 1991. Molecular genetics and pathogenesis of Clostridium perfringens. Microbiol. Rev. 55: 621-648.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  27. Regamey A, Karamata D. 1998. The N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase encoded by the Bacillus subtilis 168 prophage SPβ. Microbiology 144: 885-893.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Stein T. 2008. Whole-cell matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry for rapid identification of bacteriocin/lantibiotic-producing bacteria. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 22: 1146-1152.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Stein T, Borchert S, Conrad B, Feesche J, Hofemeister B, Hofemeister J, et al. 2002. Two different lantibiotic like peptides originate from the ericin gene cluster of Bacillus subtilis A1/3. J. Bacteriol. 184: 1703-1711.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Marx R, Stein T, Entian KD, Glaser SJ. 2001. Structure of the Bacillus subtilis peptide antibiotic subtilosin A determined by 1H-NMR and matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Protein Chem. 20: 501-506.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Paik SH, Chakicherla A, Hansen JN. 1998. Identification and characterization of the structural and transporter genes for, and the chemical and biological properties of sublancin 168, a novel lantibiotic produced by Bacillus subtilis 168. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 23134-23142.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Stein T, Düsterhus S, Stroh A, Entian KD. 2004. Subtilosin production by two Bacillus subtilis subspecies and variance of the sbo-alb cluster. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 2349-2353.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Sutyak KE, Wirawan RE, Aroutcheva AA, Chikindas ML. 2008. Isolation of the Bacillus subtilis antimicrobial peptide subtilosin from the dairy product‐derived Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. J. Appl. Microbiol. 104: 1067-1074.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Rani RP, Anandharaj M, Hema S, Deepika R, Ravindran AD. 2016. Purification of antilisterial Peptide (subtilosin A) from Novel Bacillus tequilensis FR9 and demonstrate their pathogen invasion protection ability using human carcinoma cell line. Front. Microbiol. 7: 1910.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  35. Kwon GH, Lee HA, Kim JH. 2010. A bacteriocin of 5-kDa in size secreted by Bacillus subtilis 168. Korean J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38: 163-167.
  36. Kindoli S, Lee HA, Kim JH. 2012. Properties of a bacteriocin from Bacillus subtilis H27 isolated from Cheonggukjang. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 21: 1745-1751.
    CrossRef
  37. Jack RW, Tagg JR, Ray B. 1995. Bacteriocin of gram-positive bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 59: 171-200.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  38. Lee NK, Yeo IC, Park JW, Kang BS, Hahm YT. 2010. Isolation and characterization of a novel analyte from Bacillus subtilis SC-8 antagonistic to Bacillus cereus. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 110: 298-303.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Kamoun F, Mejdoub H, Aouissaoui H, Reinbolt J, Hammani A, Jaoua S. 2005. Purification, amino acid sequence and characterization of Bacthuricin F4, a new bacteriocin produced by Bacillus thuringiensis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 98: 881-888.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. Chen L, Gu Q, Li P, Li Y, Song D, Yang J. 2018. Purification and Characterization of Plantaricin ZJ316, a Novel Bacteriocin against Listeria monocytogenes from Lactobacillus plantarum ZJ316. J. Food Protect. 81: 1929-1935.
    Pubmed CrossRef