전체메뉴
검색
Article Search

JMB Journal of Microbiolog and Biotechnology

QR Code QR Code

Research article


References

  1. Miki M, Hitoshi K. 2010. Role of two-component system of Streptococcus mutans in the adaptive response to the oral environment. J. Oral Biosci. 52: 252-259.
    CrossRef
  2. Kim HJ, Lee JH. 2020. Anti-biofilm effect of egg yolk phosvitin by inhibition of biomass production and adherence activity against Streptococcus mutans. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 40: 1001-1013.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  3. Salli KM, Forssten SD, Lahtinen SJ, Ouwehand AC. 2016. Influence of sucrose and xylitol on an early Streptococcus mutans biofilm in a dental simulator. Arch. Oral Biol. 70: 39-46.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Lim SM, Lee NK, Paik HD. 2020. Antibacterial and anticavity activity of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum 200661 isolated from fermented foods against Streptococcus mutans. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 118: 108840.
    CrossRef
  5. Yimeng C, Huiwei Y, Wujun W, Pengfei P, Yin W, Xinyu W, et al. 2020. Killing Streptococcus mutans in mature bioflm with a combination of antimicrobial and antibioflm peptides. Amino Acids 52: 1-14.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. World Health Organization, 2003. Oral health to use from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/oral-health. Accessed Mar. 25, 2020.
  7. Baker JL, Faustoferri RC, Quivey RG Jr. 2017. Acid-adaptive mechanisms of Streptococcus mutans-the more we know, the more we don't. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 32: 107-117.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  8. Kim AR, Ahn KB, Yun CH, Park OJ, Perinpanayagam H, Yoo YJ, et al. 2019. Lactobacillus plantarum lipoteichoic acid inhibits oral multispecies biofilm. J. Endod. 45: 310-315.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Cai JN, Kim MA, Jung JE, Pandit S, Song KY, Jeon JG. 2015. Effects of combined oleic acid and fluoride at sub-MIC levels on EPS formation and viability of Streptococcus mutans UA159 biofilms. Biofouling 31: 555-563.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Lee NK, Kim SY, Han KJ, Eom SJ, Paik HD. 2014. Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains with anti-allergic effects from kimchi for yogurt starters. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 58: 130-134.
    CrossRef
  11. Tareb R, Bemardeau M, Gueguen M, Vernoux JP. 2013. In vitro characterization of aggregation and adhesion properties of viable and heat-killed forms of two probiotic Lactobacillus strains and interaction with foodborne zoonotic bacteria. especially Campylobacter jejuni. J. Med. Microbiol. 62: 637-649.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Cruz AGD, Ranadheera CS, Nazzaro F, Mortazavian A. 2021. Probiotics and Prebiotics in Foods, pp. 59-80. In: Michel RM, Pedro HFS, Luciana PM, Segio S, Arthur CO, Flavia F (eds), Chapter 4 - Probiotics and Prebiotic in Oral Health. Academic Press, Massachusetts.
    CrossRef
  13. Parul C, Renuka D, Anuradha S, Neeru B, & Mahesh SD. 2020. A critical appraisal of the effects of probiotics on oral health. J. Funct. Foods 70: 103985.
    CrossRef
  14. Jang HJ, Lee NK, Paik HD. 2019. Probiotic characterization of Lactobacillus brevis KU15153 showing antimicrobial and antioxidant effect isolated from kimchi. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 28: 1521-1528.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  15. Sorroche F, Bogino P, Russo DM, Zorreguieta A, Nievas F, Morales GM, et al. 2018. Cell autoaggregation biofilm formation, and plant attachment in a Sinorhizobium meliloti lpsB mutant. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 31: 1075-1082.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Chiba A, Sugimoto S, Sato F, Hori S, Mizunoe Y. 2015. A refined technique for extraction of extracellular matrices from bacterial biofilms and its applicability. Microb. Biotechnol. 8: 392-403.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  17. Song YJ, Yu HH, Kim YJ, Lee NK, Paik HD. 2019. Anti-biofilm activity of grapefruit seed extract against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. J. Mircobiol. Biotechnol. 29: 1177-1183.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Yu HH, Song YJ, Yu HS, Lee NK, Paik HD. 2020. Investigating the antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects of cinnamaldehyde against Campylobacter spp. using cell surface characteristics. J. Food Sci. 85: 157-164.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Badet C, Richard B, Castaing-Debat M, De Flaujac PM, Dorignac G. 2004. Adaptation of salivary Lactobacillus strains to xylitol. Arch. Oral Biol. 49: 161-164.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Taku F, Yutaka T, Tomonori H, Shigetada K, Takashi O, Shizuo S, et al. 1998. Molecular analyses of glucosyltransferase genes among strains of Streptococcus mutans. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 161: 331-336.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Zhang G, Lu M, Liu R, Tian Y, Vu VH, Li Y, et al. 2020. Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation and virulence by Lactobacillus plantarum K41 isolated from traditional sichuan pickles. Front. Microbiol. 11: 774.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  22. Zhang Z, Lyu X, Xu Q, Li C, Lu M, Gong T, et al. 2020. Utilization of the extract of Cedrus deodara (Roxb.Ex D.Don) G. Don against the biofilm formation and the expression of virulence genes of cariogenic bacterium Streptococcus mutans. J. Ethnopharmacol. 257: 112856.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Tahmourespour A, Karsa Kermanshahi R, Salehi R, Nabinezhad AAR. 2008. The relationship between cell surface hydrophobicity and antibiotic resistance of Streptococcal strains isolated from dental plaque and caries. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 10: 251-255.
  24. Fang F, Xu J, Li Q, Xia X, Du G. 2018. Characterization of a Lactobaciilus brevis strain with potential oral probiotic properties. BMC Microbiol. 18: 221.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  25. Yoo Y, Seo DH, Lee H, Cho ES, Song NE, Nam TG, et al. 2019. Inhibitory effect of Bacillus velezensis on biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans. J. Biotechnol. 298: 57-63.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Sun Y, Jiang W, Zhang M, Zhang L, Shen Y, Huang S, et al. 2021. The inhibitory effects of ficin on Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation. Biomed Res. Int. 2021: 6692328.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  27. Jang HJ, Kim JH, Lee NK, Paik HD. 2021. Inhibitory effects of Lactobacillus brevis KU15153 against Streptococcus mutans KCTC 5316 causing dental caries. Microb. Pathog. 157: 104938.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Sambanthamoorthy K, Feng X, Patel R, Patel S, Paranavitana C. 2014. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm potential of biosurfactants isolated from lactobacilli against multi-drug-resistant pathogens. BMC Microbiol. 14: 197.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  29. Jamwal A, Sharma K, Chauhan R, Bansal S, Goel G. 2019. Evaluation of commercial probiotic lactic cultures against biofilm formation by Cronobacter sakazakii. Intest. Res. 17: 192-201.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  30. Tahmourespour A, Salehi R, Kermanshahi RK. 2011. Lactobacillus acidophilus-derived biosurfactant effect on GTFB and GTFC expression level in Streptococcus mutans biofilm cells. Braz. J. Microbiol. 42: 330-339.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  31. Ahn KB, Baik JE, Park OJ, Yun CH, Han SH. 2018. Lactobacillus plantarum lipoteichoic acid inhibits biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans. PLoS One 13: e0192694.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  32. Lin X, Chen X, Tu W, Wang S, Chen H. 2017. Effect of probiotic Lactobacilli on the growth of Streptococcus mutans and multispecies biofilms isolated from children with active caries. Med. Sci. Monit. 23: 4175-4181.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  33. Jeffrey AB. 2004. Virulence properties of Streptococcus. Front. Biosci. 9: 1264-1277.
    Pubmed CrossRef

Related articles in JMB

More Related Articles

Article

Research article

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022; 32(1): 56-63

Published online January 28, 2022 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2109.09045

Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Effect of Cell-Free Supernatant of Lactobacillus brevis KCCM 202399 Isolated from Korean Fermented Food against Streptococcus mutans KCTC 5458

Jong Ha Kim, Hye Ji Jang, Na-Kyoung Lee, and Hyun-Dong Paik*

Department of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resource Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to:Hyun-Dong Paik,       hdpaik@konkuk.ac.kr

Received: September 24, 2021; Revised: October 8, 2021; Accepted: October 15, 2021

Abstract

This study aims to determine the antibiofilm effect of cell-free supernatant (CFS) of Lactobacillus brevis strains against Streptococcus mutans strains. To study the antibiofilm mechanism against S. mutans strains, antibacterial effects, cell surface properties (auto-aggregation and cell surface hydrophobicity), exopolysaccharide (EPS) production, and morphological changes were examined. The antibiofilm effect of L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS as morphological changes were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), compared with the control treatment. Among the L. brevis strains, L. brevis KCCM 202399 showed the highest antibiofilm effect on S. mutans KCTC 5458. The antibacterial effect of L. brevis KCCM 202399 against S. mutans KCTC 5458 was investigated using the deferred method (16.00 mm). The minimum inhibitory concentration of L. brevis KCCM 202399 against S. mutans KCTC 5458 was 25.00%. Compared with the control treatment, L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS inhibited the bacterial adhesion of S. mutans KCTC 5458 by decreasing auto-aggregation, cell surface hydrophobicity, and EPS production (45.91%, 40.51%, and 67.44%, respectively). L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS inhibited and eradicated the S. mutans KCTC 5458 biofilm. Therefore, these results suggest that L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS may be used to develop oral health in the probiotic industry.

Keywords: Probiotics, antibacterial effect, antibiofilm effect, Streptococcus mutans

Introduction

Streptococcus mutans, a major microorganism of human dental caries in the oral cavity, can form biofilms on the teeth [1]. Their aggregation ability allows the colonization of S. mutans on the surface of human teeth, as a first step in the development of biofilms [2]. Thereafter, S. mutans glucosyltransferases (gtfs) begin to synthesize glucan, which increases the adherence of bacteria. In the presence of sucrose, gtfs also produce extracellular polysaccharides (EPSs) from sucrose [3]. Among the EPSs, glucan mediates the initial stage of adherence of oral bacteria on the tooth surface and stimulates the biofilm [4]. Once biofilm forms on a tooth surface, not only is it difficult to remove but also infects other tooth surfaces [5].

Dental caries, caused by S. mutans, is an oral disease affecting the health of adults and children [3]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) report, more than 530 million children globally have dental caries in their primary teeth [6]. At present, dental caries has been treated using mechanical removal, such as tooth brushing and treatment with mouthwashes containing chlorhexidine and fluoride [7]. However, these methods can also destroy the ecological balance of the oral cavity or damage tissues [8].

Probiotics are live bacteria that can modulate the intestinal microflora when ingested in adequate amounts by the host [9, 10]. The characteristic properties of probiotics can prevent invasion and cellular adhesion of pathogenic bacteria [11]. In recent decades, the use of probiotics to prevent oral infections has significantly increased. Some of the specific Lactobacillus strains have shown the potential to interfere with oral ecology by inhibiting pathogenic bacteria such as S. mutans [12, 13]. Therefore, this study aims to identify antibacterial and antibiofilm effects of Lactobacillus brevis strains isolated from Korean fermented foods against oral pathogenic S. mutans strains.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

L. brevis strains were isolated using lactobacilli MRS (BD Bioscience, USA). Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (Cell Biotech, Ltd., Korea) was used as a commercial control strain and obtained from the Korean Collection for Type Cultures (Korea). All Lactobacillus strains were cultured in MRS broth at 37°C for 24 h.

S. mutans KCTC 5124, KCTC 5458, and KCTC 5316 were obtained from the Korean Collection for Type Cultures. The strains were cultured in brain heart infusion broth (BHI, BD Bioscience, USA) supplemented with 3% sucrose at 37°C for 24 h and used as oral pathogenic bacteria.

Preparation Cell-Free Supernatant (CFS) of Lactobacillus Strains

Lactobacillus strains were cultured in MRS broth at 37°C for 24 h. The CFSs of the strains CFS were centrifuged (12,000 ×g for 10 min at 4°C) and filtered through a 0.45-μm pore size syringe filter (Advantec, Japan) (pH 4.3) and stored at −80°C until further use.

Antibacterial Effect of L. brevis Strains against S. mutans Strains

The antibacterial effect of L. brevis strains against S. mutans strains was investigated using the deferred method with minor modifications [14]. L. brevis strains (3 μl; 1 × 109 CFU/mL) were spotted onto MRS agar and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. S. mutans strains (100 μl), as an indicator of oral diseases (1 × 107 CFU/ml), were inoculated into 4 ml of BHI soft agar containing 3% sucrose, followed by soft agar overlay. The plate was incubated at 37°C for 24 h in an anaerobic incubator. Clear zones were measured and expressed in terms of millimeters.

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of L. brevis Strains against S. mutans Strains

The MIC of L. brevis strains against S. mutans strains was investigated using the method described by Lim et al. [4] with some modifications. CFSs of the L. brevis strains were serially diluted two-fold using BHI broth containing 3% sucrose ranging from 100% to 0.78% in a 96 well plate (SPL, Korea). S. mutans strains (1 × 107 CFU/ml) and diluted CFSs were added to each well. The lowest sample concentration that inhibited 99% of the inoculum was considered the MIC.

Cell Surface Properties

The auto-aggregation and cell surface hydrophobicity of S. mutans KCTC 5458 were evaluated using the method of Sorroche et al. [15] with minor modifications. Five milliliters of S. mutans KCTC 5458 (1 × 107 CFU/ml) was mixed with 5 ml of CFS diluted to 1/2 × MIC in BHI broth and incubated at 37°C for 24 h under anaerobic conditions; non-treated cells were used as a control. After incubation, cells were centrifuged (12,000 ×g for 10 min at 4°C), and the pellet was washed twice and resuspended with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4; Hycolone, USA) to an optical density (OD) of 0.5 ± 0.05 at 600 nm (ODinitial). The suspensions were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Thereafter, the OD at 600 nm was measured for suspension (ODTreatment). Auto-aggregation (%) was calculated as follows:

Auto-aggregation (%) =1-ODTreatmentODInitial×100

After washing the cells, the absorbance at 600 nm (ODInitial) was adjusted to 0.5 ± 0. Chloroform (0.5 ml) was added to each cell suspension (2 ml) and pre-incubated for 10 min at 37°C. Thereafter, the mixtures were vortexed for 2 min and incubated for 15 min at 37°C. The aqueous phase was measured at 600 nm (ODTreatment). The cell surface hydrophobicity was calculated using the following formula:

Cell surface hydrophobicity (%) =1-ODTreatmentODInitial×100

Analysis of Total EPS Production Rate

EPS production by S. mutans KCTC 5458 was measured by the phenol-sulfuric acid method with some modifications [16]. Five milliliters of S. mutans KCTC 5458 diluted to 107 CFU/ml in BHI broth containing 3%sucrose was mixed with 5 ml of CFS diluted to 1/2 × MIC in BHI broth containing 3% sucrose and incubated at 37°C for 24 h under anaerobic conditions; non-treated cells were used as a control. After incubation, the treated mixtures were centrifuged at 12,000 ×g at 4°C for 10 min, and 1 ml of supernatant was mixed with 2 ml of 99% ethyl alcohol and incubated for 24 h at 4°C. After incubation, the mixture was centrifuged at 14,240 ×g for 15 min, and the pellets were resuspended in 500 μl of distilled water. In the cell suspension (100 μl), 5% phenol (100 μl), and 95% sulfuric acid (4 ml) were mixed; the mixture was vortexed, and incubated at 30°C for 10 min. The absorbance was calculated using the following formula:

EPS production rate (%) =ODTreatmentODControl×100

Biofilm Assay

Biofilm inhibition and eradication were measured using a crystal violet assay, with some modifications [17]. Overnight cultured S. mutans KCTC 5458 was diluted to 107 CFU/ml in BHI broth containing 3% sucrose. To determine the inhibitory effect of L. brevis CFS on the formation of S. mutans biofilm, 50 μl of bacterial cultures and 50 μl of CFS diluted to 1/2 × MIC in BHI broth containing 3% sucrose were transferred to a 96 well plate and incubated at 37°C for 24 h; untreated cells were used as a control. After biofilm formation, the cell suspensions were removed using a micropipette. The plates were washed twice with 150 μl of PBS. Plates were dried at 37°C for 20 min. Thereafter, 1% crystal violet was added to each well to stain the biofilm-forming cells for 30 min at room temperature. After dyeing, the plate was rinsed and dissolved in a solution of 30% methanol and 10% acetic acid. The OD of each sample was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader (Molecular Devices, USA).

To investigate the effect of eradication on the formation of S. mutans biofilms, the cell density was adjusted to 107 CFU/ml in BHI broth containing 3% sucrose, and 100 μl of cell suspension was inoculated into 96 well plate and incubated at 37°C for 24 h under anaerobic conditions; non-treated cells were used as a control. After incubation, each well was washed twice with 150 μl PBS. One hundred microliters of L. brevis CFS (1/2 × MIC and MIC) was added to each well and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Non-treated cells were used as a control. The results were quantified as follows.

Biofilm inhibition and eradication rate (%) =1-ODTreatmentODInitial×100

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis

SEM was performed to investigate the biofilm inhibition effect of L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS on S. mutans KCTC 5458 biofilm using a modified method [18]. Overnight cultured S. mutans KCTC 5458 was diluted to 107 CFU/ml using BHI broth containing 3% sucrose. Two milliliters of bacterial suspension and 2 ml of CFS diluted to 1/2 × MIC in BHI broth containing 3% sucrose were cultured in each well of a six-well plate containing glass coupons and incubated at 37°C for 24 h under anaerobic conditions. The control group was treated with BHI broth containing 3% sucrose. The biofilms formed on the glass coupons were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS at 4°C for 1 h. The fixed samples were washed twice with PBS and dehydrated for 30 min using gradually increasing concentrations of ethanol solutions (50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100%). Ethanol was replaced with isoamyl acetate, and the coupons were dried in a freeze dryer and then coated with platinum particles (15 mV for 1.5 min). The S. mutans KCTC 5458 biofilm was observed using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM; SU8010; Hitachi High-Technologies Co., Japan).

Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) Analysis

CLSM was performed to evaluate the biofilm inhibition effect of L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS on S. mutans KCTC 5458 biofilm. Biofilms of S. mutans KCTC 5458 were prepared using the same protocol as described in section 2.8. After biofilm formation, the glass coupons were washed twice with PBS. Live and dead cells were stained with 1 μM SYTO9 and propidium iodide (PI) for 20 min in the dark at room temperature. After staining, the glass coupons were washed twice with PBS and observed under a Zeiss LSM 800 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) using a 10 × objective lens and an appropriate standard filter.

Statistical Analysis

All experiments were repeated three times with duplicate samples, and the results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 18.0. Significant differences among means were determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results

Antibacterial Effect against S. mutans Strains

The antibacterial effects of Lactobacillus strains against S. mutans strains are presented in Table 1. Among S. mutans strains, L. brevis strains showed a higher antibacterial effect against S. mutans KCTC 5458 than against S. mutans KCTC 5124 and S. mutans KCTC 5316, except for L. rhamnosus GG. Antibacterial effects of L. rhamnosus GG were 7.55 ± 1.3 mm and 9.11 ± 1.0 mm against S. mutans KCTC 5124 and S. mutans KCTC 5316, respectively (Table 1; p < 0.05). L. brevis strains showed a high antibacterial effect against S. mutans KCTC 5458 (all Lactobacillus strains examined had an inhibition zone over 10 mm). L. rhamnosus GG and L. brevis KCCM 202399 showed higher antibacterial effect against S. mutans KCTC 5458 than other L. brevis strains (16.66 ± 1.0 mm and 16.00 ± 1.0 mm, respectively; Table 1). Table 2 shows the MIC of L. brevis strains CFS against S. mutans strains. L. brevis strains CFS showed antibacterial effects against S. mutans KCTC 5458, except for S. mutans KCTC 5124 and S. mutans KCTC 5316. The MICs of L. rhamnosus GG were 25%, 6.25%, and 25% against S. mutans KCTC 5124, S. mutans KCTC 5458, and S. mutans KCTC 5316, respectively, while those of L. brevis KCCM 202399 were 25%, 6.25%, and 25%, respectively. L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS showed better antibacterial effects against S. mutans strains than the other L. brevis strains.

Table 1 . Inhibition effect of Lactobacillus strains against Streptococcus mutans strains..

Oral pathogenic bacteriaInhibitory diameter (mm)

LGG1)KCCM 2023992)KU151593)KU151474)KCCM 2023025)KCCM 2000196)
S. mutans KCTC 51247.55 ± 1.33a7.66 ± 0.86a5.66 ± 0.86b6.33 ± 1.22a6.11 ± 1.16b4.88 ± 1.05b
S. mutans KCTC 545816.27 ± 2.10a16.11 ± 1.45a13.33 ± 1.73bc14.83 ± 0.93ab11.72 ± 1.60cd10.66 ± 1.32d
S. mutans KCTC 53169.44 ± 1.42a8.56 ± 1.67a6.89 ± 0.78b6.33 ± 1.00b6.78 ± 2.05b5.33 ± 0.71b

1-6)LGG, L. rhamnosus GG; KCCM 202399, L. brevis KCCM 202399; KU15159, L. brevis KU15159; KU15147, L. brevis KU15147; KCCM 202302, L. brevis KCCM 202302; KCCM 200019, L. brevis KCCM 200019..

All values are mean ± standard deviation..

a-dValues with different letters in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05). 1-6) LGG, L. rhamnosus GG; KCCM 202399, L. brevis KCCM 202399; KU15159, L. brevis KU15159; KU15147, L. brevis KU15147; KCCM 202302, L. brevis KCCM 202302; KCCM 200019, L. brevis KCCM 200019..

All values are mean ± standard deviation..

a-dValues with different letters in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05)..


Table 2 . Antibacterial effect of the Lactobacillus strains cell free supernatant (CFS) against S. mutans strains..

Oral pathogenic bacteriaMinimal inhibitory concentration (%)

LGG1)KCCM 2023992)KU151593)KU151474)KCCM 2023025)KCCM 2000196)
S. mutans KCTC 512425 ± 0.0a25 ± 0.0a50 ± 0.0b50 ± 0.0b50 ± 0.0b50 ± 0.0b
S. mutans KCTC 54586.25 ± 0.0a6.25 ± 0.0a12.5 ± 0.0b12.5 ± 0.0b25 ± 0.0c25 ± 0.0c
S. mutans KCTC 531625 ± 0.0a25 ± 0.0a50 ± 0.0b50 ± 0.0b50 ± 0.0b50 ± 0.0b

1-6)LGG, L. rhamnosus GG; KCCM 202399, L. brevis KCCM 202399; KU15159, L. brevis KU15159; KU15147, L. brevis KU15147; KCCM 202302, L. brevis KCCM 202302; KCCM 200019, L. brevis KCCM 200019..

All values are mean ± standard deviation..

a-cValues with different letters in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05)..



Cell Surface Properties

The effects of L. brevis strains CFS on auto-aggregation and cell surface hydrophobicity of S. mutans KCTC 5458 are shown in Table 3. Treatment with L. brevis strains CFS decreased auto-aggregation (p < 0.05) and cell-surface hydrophobicity (p < 0.05) of S. mutans KCTC 5458, compared with the negative control. The auto-aggregation ability of S. mutans KCTC 5458 treated with L. brevis KCCM 202399 and L. brevis KU15147 decreased by 45.91%and 49.11%, respectively. Additionally, S. mutans KCTC 5458 treated with L. rhamnosus GG was 46.35%. The cell surface hydrophobicity of S. mutans KCTC 5458 treated with L. rhamnosus GG CFS and L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS was 32.97% and 40.51%, respectively. Our results showed that Lactobacillus strains CFS inhibited bacterial adhesion by decreasing the auto-aggregation and cell-surface hydrophobicity of S. mutans KCTC 5458.

Table 3 . Effects of the cell-free supernatant of Lactobacillus strains on auto-aggregation and cell surface hydrophobicity of S.mutans KCTC 5458..

Probiotics strains

LGG1)KCCM 2023992)KU151593)KU151474)KCCM 2023025)KCCM 2000196)
Auto-aggregation (%)
Control7)67.34 ± 3.367.34 ± 3.367.34 ± 3.367.34 ± 3.367.34 ± 3.367.34 ± 3.3
Treated8)46.35 ± 3.18a45.91 ± 1.97a56.94 ± 3.21b49.11 ± 0.88c59.76 ± 2.26d54.54 ± 1.7c
Hydrophobicity (%)
Control56.39 ± 3.556.39 ± 3.556.39 ± 3.556.39 ± 3.556.39 ± 3.556.39 ± 3.5
Treated32.97 ± 0.39a40.51 ± 1.04b48.44 ± 4.43c45.18 ± 1.72c52.19 ± 3.67d45.93 ± 7.61c

1-8)LGG, L. rhamnosus GG; KCCM 202399, L. brevis KCCM 202399; KU15159, L. brevis KU15159; KU15147, L. brevis KU15147; KCCM 202302, L. brevis KCCM 202302; KCCM 200019, L. brevis KCCM 200019; control, treated with probiotic CFS..

a-cValues with different letters in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05)..

All values are mean ± standard deviation..



EPS Production Rate

The EPS production rate of S. mutans KCTC 5458 treated with L. brevis strains CFS was evaluated using a modified phenol-sulfuric acid method [16]. Fig. 1 presents the inhibitory effect of L. brevis strain CFS on EPS production rate (p < 0.05). Treatment with L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS resulted in the lowest EPS production rate (67.44%). For treatment with L. rhamnosus GG CFS, the EPS production rate was 72.35%, followed by treatment with L. brevis KU15147, and L. brevis KCCM 200019 (73.66% and 76.44%, respectively). As shown in Fig. 1 and Supplementary Tables 1, 2, and 3, L. brevis KCCM 202399, L. brevis KU15159, and L. brevis KU15147 CFS had a greater inhibitory effect on S. mutans growth and EPS production than other L. brevis strains.

Figure 1. EPS production rate of Streptococcus mutans KCTC 5458 treated with cell-free supernatant (CFS) of Lactobacillus brevis strains. □, Control (treated L. brevis strains); ■, L. brevis strains; LGG, L. rhamnosus GG. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation, with a-ddifferent letters on each bar representing significant differences (p < 0.05).

Biofilm Inhibition and Eradication Effects of CFS

The inhibitory effect of L. brevis CFS on S. mutans KCTC 5458 biofilm is shown in Fig. 2A (p < 0.05); the concentration of CFS ranging from 1/2 × MIC and MIC inhibited the formation of S. mutans biofilm. Upon treatment with CFS at MIC concentration, L. brevis KCCM 202399 showed highest inhibition effects against S. mutans (68.54%). In addition, the inhibition effect of L. rhamnosus GG CFS was 70.05%. This inhibitory tendency was similarly observed at 1/2 MIC concentrations. Upon treatment with CFS at 1/2 MIC concentrations, the inhibition effects of L. rhamnosus GG CFS and L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS were 41.45% and 35.28%, respectively. The degradation effect of L. brevis CFS on mature biofilms is shown in Fig. 2B (p < 0.05). Upon treatment with CFS MIC, the degradation effect of L. rhamnosus GG CFS, L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS, and L. brevis KU15147 CFS was 51.19%, 50.29%, and 45.44%, respectively. However, upon treatment with CFS at 1/2 MIC concentrations, L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS showed a greater degradation effect than the other L. brevis strains CFS (39.75%; p < 0.05). The biofilm inhibition and degradation effects of L. brevis CFS were dose-dependent. As shown in Fig. 2, L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS showed greater biofilm inhibition and eradication effects against S. mutans than other L. brevis strains CFS (p < 0.05).

Figure 2. Antibiofilm effects of cell-free supernatant (CFS) of Lactobacillus brevis strains on Streptococcus mutans KCTC 5458. (A), Biofilm inhibition effect of CFS; (B), Biofilm eradication effect of CFS. LGG, L. rhamnosus GG; KCCM 202399, L. brevis KCCM 202399; KU15159, L. brevis KU15159; KU15147, L. brevis KU15147; KCCM 202302, L. brevis KCCM 202302; KCCM 200019, L. brevis KCCM 200019. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation, with a-gdifferent letters on each bar representing significant differences (p < 0.05).

SEM Analysis on Glass Coupon

The effects of L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS on biofilm formation by S. mutans KCTC 5458 on glass coupons were also evaluated by SEM (Fig. 3). In the control group, S. mutans KCTC 5458 formed numerous bacterial cells and a large biofilm on the glass coupons (Fig. 3A). However, biofilm structures of S. mutans KCTC 5458 treated-L. rhamnosus GG CFS and L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS were spread, resulting in decreased bacterial cells and biofilms on glass coupons (Figs. 3B and 3C). Considering the results of the other experiments, including cell surface properties (Table 3), EPS production (Fig. 1), biofilm inhibition and degradation effects (Fig. 2), the inhibitory effect of probiotic L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS from S. mutans biofilm was confirmed.

Figure 3. Streptococcus mutans KCTC 5458 biofilm on glass coupons surface treatment with cell-free supernatant (CFS) of Lactobacillus brevis KCCM 202399 visualized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (magnification: × 1,000, × 5,000, and × 10,000). A group: control group (untreated with L. brevis CFS); B group: treated with L. rhamnosus GG CFS; C group: treated with L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS.

CLSM Analysis on Glass Coupon

The antibiofilm and antibacterial effects of L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS against S. mutans KCTC 5458 on glass coupons were observed via CLSM. CLSM images showed S. mutans biofilms with viable and non-viable cells (green and red, respectively). In the control, S. mutans KCTC 5458 showed a dense biofilm structure and biofilm cells (Fig. 4A1, 2). However, the biofilm structures of L. rhamnosus GG CFS- and L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS-treated S. mutans KCTC 5458 were decreased. Furthermore, L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS showed significantly reduced viability of S. mutans KCTC 5458 biofilm cells compared with L. rhamnosus GG CFS (Figs. 4B and 4C).

Figure 4. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images of Streptococcus mutans KCTC 5458 biofilm on glass coupons surface treated with Lactobacillus brevis KCCM 202399 cell-free supernatant (CFS) (× 100 magnification). A group: control group (untreated with L. brevis CFS); B group: treated with L. rhamnosus GG CFS; C group: treated with L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS.

Discussion

Dental caries is a major oral disease that is multi-species biofilm-mediated. Dental plaque, which is a multi-species biofilm, is transformed from cariogenic to non-cariogenic plaque. S. mutans is a cariogenic bacteria in dental plaque that colonizes the tooth surface and forms biofilms [5]. Once S. mutans forms a biofilm, it is difficult to remove; therefore, its early control is important. This study was aimed at investigating the antibacterial and antibiofilm effects of L. brevis strains isolated from kimchi.

In this study, methods were developed to screen the antibacterial effect of L. brevis strains against S. mutans strains. The results showed that L. brevis strains showed a higher antibacterial effect against S. mutans KCTC 5458 than against S. mutans KCTC 5124 and S. mutans KCTC 5316. Thereafter, antibacterial effect of L. brevis strains against S. mutans strains was investigated by using L. brevis CFS; it was confirmed that L. brevis strains have a higher antibacterial effect on S. mutans KCTC 5458 than on S. mutans KCTC 5124 and S. mutans KCTC 5316. Some Lactobacilli strains can metabolize sucrose, co-aggregate with S. mutans, and are often tolerant to fluoride [19]. Therefore, probiotic supernatant could be safely used as an antibacterial agent for treating dental plaque. Taku et al. [20] reported that the “expression” or “sensitivity” of gtf gene, which synthesizes water in-soluble or soluble glucans from sucrose, would be affected differently in different S. mutans strains. CFSs of all L. brevis strains showed greater antibacterial effect against S. mutans KCTC 5458 than against S. mutans KCTC 5124 and S. mutans KCTC 5316. In particular, L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS showed an antibacterial effect at the lowest concentration among the L. brevis strains (Table 2). Therefore, we focused on the antibacterial effect of L. brevis CFS against S. mutans KCTC 5458.

Auto-aggregation, cell surface hydrophobicity, and EPS production changes in S. mutans are important to prevent S. mutans adhesion, colonization, and early biofilm formation [21]. Auto-aggregation of S. mutans is beneficial for its adhesion to tooth surface, as the resulting biofilm formed prevents this bacterium from an adverse external environment [22]. S. mutans has a high overall proportion of hydrophobic bacteria, and its cell surface hydrophobicity may play a role in the adherence of oral bacteria to the tooth surface [23]. Therefore, we investigated the effect of L. brevis CFS on the auto-aggregation ability and cell surface physiochemical properties of S. mutans KCTC 5458. In this study, L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS showed the highest reduction in auto-aggregation and cell surface hydrophobicity of S. mutans KCTC 5458. In another study, auto-aggregation of S. mutans ATCC 25175 treated with L. brevis BBE-Y52 was higher than that in the presence of other Lactobacillus strains [24]. In addition, Bacillus velezensis K68-treated L. brevis strains exhibited increased cell surface hydrophobicity, compared with the untreated control [25]. EPS produced by S. mutans is a major factor in biofilm formation. As sucrose exists in oral conditions, gtfs from S. mutans plays critical roles in the development of virulent dental plaque [26]. In the presence of L. brevis CFS, EPS production by S. mutans KCTC 5458 decreased. In particular, L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS showed the highest reduction in EPS production by S. mutans. These results suggest that L. brevis KCCM 202399 reduces sucrose-dependent EPS production by downregulating gtfs. In our previous study, L. brevis KU15153 CFS decreased EPS production by approximately 41% (p < 0.05) [27]. A previous study reported that biosurfactants produced by probiotics have antibacterial and anti-adhesive properties [28]. The biosurfactants in metabolites exuded by Lactobacilli interfere with the adhesion of cells. These decrease the hydrophobicity of the cell surface substratum and interfere with the progression of microbial adhesion ability [29]. In addition, Tahmourespour et al. [30] reported that Lactobacillus acidophilus-derived biosurfactant down-regulated gtfs B and C genes, and virulence factors were associated with glucan in dental plaque.

Changes in cell surface properties and EPS production by L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS also affected biofilm formation by S. mutans KCTC 5458. In this study, 1/2 MIC and MIC concentrations of L. brevis CFS were used for treatment and the inhibition rate of S. mutans biofilm as a function of CFS concentration was investigated. The biofilm formed by S. mutans in the presence of L. brevis strains CFS exhibited a dose-dependent reduction in biomass compared to the control group that did not receive CFS. In particular, L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS showed the highest inhibitory effect against S. mutans KCTC 5458 at 1/2 MIC and MIC levels. In our previous study, L. rhamnosus GG was reported to have a significant antibacterial effect against S. mutans [4]. Ahn et al. [31] reported that lipoteichoic acid of probiotics could inhibit biofilm formation by S. mutans. Additionally, bacteriocin, an antibacterial substance produced by probiotic Lactobacilli, can kill gram-positive bacteria by disrupting their cell membranes, inhibit their growth by lowering pH and hamper bacterial DNA synthesis by producing hydrogen peroxide [32]. We also conducted SEM and CLSM analyses to investigate the reduction in biofilm formation and viability of biofilm cells as imaging. S. mutans KCTC 5458 treated with L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS showed that the biofilm was dispersed with little aggregation, and the number of cells on glass coupons was decreased compared with that for the control (Fig. 3). Compared with L. rhamnosus GG, L. brevis KCCM 202399 showed a higher number of dead biofilm cells, as evidenced by PI staining (Fig. 4). Generally, mature biofilms are more difficult to remove than early biofilms. Biofilms can protect oral bacteria, and S. mutans can induce membrane proteins to migrate and overcome cellular damage caused by environmental stress [5, 33]. The biofilm degradation effect is also important to examine the antibiofilm effect against S. mutans; however, eradication effect of probiotics on mature biofilms have rarely been reported. L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS showed the highest biofilm eradication effect against S. mutans KCTC 5458 at 1/2 MIC and MIC levels, demonstrating its action through biofilm formation and disruption of mature biofilm.

Six L. brevis strains isolated from kimchi were tested for antibacterial effects against S. mutans strains. The results showed that L. brevis KCCM 202399 had the highest antibacterial and antibiofilm effects among the L. brevis strains. Furthermore, L. brevis KCCM 202399 showed more antibacterial effects against S. mutans KCTC 5458 than against S. mutans KCTC 5124 and S. mutans KCTC 5316. L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS inhibited and eradicated the biofilm of S. mutans KCTC 5458 by decreasing its auto-aggregation, cell-surface hydrophobicity, and EPS production. The antibiofilm effects of CFS against S. mutans KCTC 5458 were also confirmed by SEM and CLSM. Therefore, this study suggests that L. brevis KCCM 202399 could be used as a functional food in the food industry.

Conflict of Interests

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.EPS production rate of Streptococcus mutans KCTC 5458 treated with cell-free supernatant (CFS) of Lactobacillus brevis strains. □, Control (treated L. brevis strains); ■, L. brevis strains; LGG, L. rhamnosus GG. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation, with a-ddifferent letters on each bar representing significant differences (p < 0.05).
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2022; 32: 56-63https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2109.09045

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Antibiofilm effects of cell-free supernatant (CFS) of Lactobacillus brevis strains on Streptococcus mutans KCTC 5458. (A), Biofilm inhibition effect of CFS; (B), Biofilm eradication effect of CFS. LGG, L. rhamnosus GG; KCCM 202399, L. brevis KCCM 202399; KU15159, L. brevis KU15159; KU15147, L. brevis KU15147; KCCM 202302, L. brevis KCCM 202302; KCCM 200019, L. brevis KCCM 200019. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation, with a-gdifferent letters on each bar representing significant differences (p < 0.05).
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2022; 32: 56-63https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2109.09045

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Streptococcus mutans KCTC 5458 biofilm on glass coupons surface treatment with cell-free supernatant (CFS) of Lactobacillus brevis KCCM 202399 visualized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (magnification: × 1,000, × 5,000, and × 10,000). A group: control group (untreated with L. brevis CFS); B group: treated with L. rhamnosus GG CFS; C group: treated with L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2022; 32: 56-63https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2109.09045

Fig 4.

Figure 4.Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images of Streptococcus mutans KCTC 5458 biofilm on glass coupons surface treated with Lactobacillus brevis KCCM 202399 cell-free supernatant (CFS) (× 100 magnification). A group: control group (untreated with L. brevis CFS); B group: treated with L. rhamnosus GG CFS; C group: treated with L. brevis KCCM 202399 CFS.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2022; 32: 56-63https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2109.09045

Table 1 . Inhibition effect of Lactobacillus strains against Streptococcus mutans strains..

Oral pathogenic bacteriaInhibitory diameter (mm)

LGG1)KCCM 2023992)KU151593)KU151474)KCCM 2023025)KCCM 2000196)
S. mutans KCTC 51247.55 ± 1.33a7.66 ± 0.86a5.66 ± 0.86b6.33 ± 1.22a6.11 ± 1.16b4.88 ± 1.05b
S. mutans KCTC 545816.27 ± 2.10a16.11 ± 1.45a13.33 ± 1.73bc14.83 ± 0.93ab11.72 ± 1.60cd10.66 ± 1.32d
S. mutans KCTC 53169.44 ± 1.42a8.56 ± 1.67a6.89 ± 0.78b6.33 ± 1.00b6.78 ± 2.05b5.33 ± 0.71b

1-6)LGG, L. rhamnosus GG; KCCM 202399, L. brevis KCCM 202399; KU15159, L. brevis KU15159; KU15147, L. brevis KU15147; KCCM 202302, L. brevis KCCM 202302; KCCM 200019, L. brevis KCCM 200019..

All values are mean ± standard deviation..

a-dValues with different letters in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05). 1-6) LGG, L. rhamnosus GG; KCCM 202399, L. brevis KCCM 202399; KU15159, L. brevis KU15159; KU15147, L. brevis KU15147; KCCM 202302, L. brevis KCCM 202302; KCCM 200019, L. brevis KCCM 200019..

All values are mean ± standard deviation..

a-dValues with different letters in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05)..


Table 2 . Antibacterial effect of the Lactobacillus strains cell free supernatant (CFS) against S. mutans strains..

Oral pathogenic bacteriaMinimal inhibitory concentration (%)

LGG1)KCCM 2023992)KU151593)KU151474)KCCM 2023025)KCCM 2000196)
S. mutans KCTC 512425 ± 0.0a25 ± 0.0a50 ± 0.0b50 ± 0.0b50 ± 0.0b50 ± 0.0b
S. mutans KCTC 54586.25 ± 0.0a6.25 ± 0.0a12.5 ± 0.0b12.5 ± 0.0b25 ± 0.0c25 ± 0.0c
S. mutans KCTC 531625 ± 0.0a25 ± 0.0a50 ± 0.0b50 ± 0.0b50 ± 0.0b50 ± 0.0b

1-6)LGG, L. rhamnosus GG; KCCM 202399, L. brevis KCCM 202399; KU15159, L. brevis KU15159; KU15147, L. brevis KU15147; KCCM 202302, L. brevis KCCM 202302; KCCM 200019, L. brevis KCCM 200019..

All values are mean ± standard deviation..

a-cValues with different letters in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05)..


Table 3 . Effects of the cell-free supernatant of Lactobacillus strains on auto-aggregation and cell surface hydrophobicity of S.mutans KCTC 5458..

Probiotics strains

LGG1)KCCM 2023992)KU151593)KU151474)KCCM 2023025)KCCM 2000196)
Auto-aggregation (%)
Control7)67.34 ± 3.367.34 ± 3.367.34 ± 3.367.34 ± 3.367.34 ± 3.367.34 ± 3.3
Treated8)46.35 ± 3.18a45.91 ± 1.97a56.94 ± 3.21b49.11 ± 0.88c59.76 ± 2.26d54.54 ± 1.7c
Hydrophobicity (%)
Control56.39 ± 3.556.39 ± 3.556.39 ± 3.556.39 ± 3.556.39 ± 3.556.39 ± 3.5
Treated32.97 ± 0.39a40.51 ± 1.04b48.44 ± 4.43c45.18 ± 1.72c52.19 ± 3.67d45.93 ± 7.61c

1-8)LGG, L. rhamnosus GG; KCCM 202399, L. brevis KCCM 202399; KU15159, L. brevis KU15159; KU15147, L. brevis KU15147; KCCM 202302, L. brevis KCCM 202302; KCCM 200019, L. brevis KCCM 200019; control, treated with probiotic CFS..

a-cValues with different letters in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05)..

All values are mean ± standard deviation..


References

  1. Miki M, Hitoshi K. 2010. Role of two-component system of Streptococcus mutans in the adaptive response to the oral environment. J. Oral Biosci. 52: 252-259.
    CrossRef
  2. Kim HJ, Lee JH. 2020. Anti-biofilm effect of egg yolk phosvitin by inhibition of biomass production and adherence activity against Streptococcus mutans. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 40: 1001-1013.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Salli KM, Forssten SD, Lahtinen SJ, Ouwehand AC. 2016. Influence of sucrose and xylitol on an early Streptococcus mutans biofilm in a dental simulator. Arch. Oral Biol. 70: 39-46.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Lim SM, Lee NK, Paik HD. 2020. Antibacterial and anticavity activity of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum 200661 isolated from fermented foods against Streptococcus mutans. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 118: 108840.
    CrossRef
  5. Yimeng C, Huiwei Y, Wujun W, Pengfei P, Yin W, Xinyu W, et al. 2020. Killing Streptococcus mutans in mature bioflm with a combination of antimicrobial and antibioflm peptides. Amino Acids 52: 1-14.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. World Health Organization, 2003. Oral health to use from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/oral-health. Accessed Mar. 25, 2020.
  7. Baker JL, Faustoferri RC, Quivey RG Jr. 2017. Acid-adaptive mechanisms of Streptococcus mutans-the more we know, the more we don't. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 32: 107-117.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Kim AR, Ahn KB, Yun CH, Park OJ, Perinpanayagam H, Yoo YJ, et al. 2019. Lactobacillus plantarum lipoteichoic acid inhibits oral multispecies biofilm. J. Endod. 45: 310-315.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Cai JN, Kim MA, Jung JE, Pandit S, Song KY, Jeon JG. 2015. Effects of combined oleic acid and fluoride at sub-MIC levels on EPS formation and viability of Streptococcus mutans UA159 biofilms. Biofouling 31: 555-563.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Lee NK, Kim SY, Han KJ, Eom SJ, Paik HD. 2014. Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains with anti-allergic effects from kimchi for yogurt starters. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 58: 130-134.
    CrossRef
  11. Tareb R, Bemardeau M, Gueguen M, Vernoux JP. 2013. In vitro characterization of aggregation and adhesion properties of viable and heat-killed forms of two probiotic Lactobacillus strains and interaction with foodborne zoonotic bacteria. especially Campylobacter jejuni. J. Med. Microbiol. 62: 637-649.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Cruz AGD, Ranadheera CS, Nazzaro F, Mortazavian A. 2021. Probiotics and Prebiotics in Foods, pp. 59-80. In: Michel RM, Pedro HFS, Luciana PM, Segio S, Arthur CO, Flavia F (eds), Chapter 4 - Probiotics and Prebiotic in Oral Health. Academic Press, Massachusetts.
    CrossRef
  13. Parul C, Renuka D, Anuradha S, Neeru B, & Mahesh SD. 2020. A critical appraisal of the effects of probiotics on oral health. J. Funct. Foods 70: 103985.
    CrossRef
  14. Jang HJ, Lee NK, Paik HD. 2019. Probiotic characterization of Lactobacillus brevis KU15153 showing antimicrobial and antioxidant effect isolated from kimchi. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 28: 1521-1528.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Sorroche F, Bogino P, Russo DM, Zorreguieta A, Nievas F, Morales GM, et al. 2018. Cell autoaggregation biofilm formation, and plant attachment in a Sinorhizobium meliloti lpsB mutant. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 31: 1075-1082.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Chiba A, Sugimoto S, Sato F, Hori S, Mizunoe Y. 2015. A refined technique for extraction of extracellular matrices from bacterial biofilms and its applicability. Microb. Biotechnol. 8: 392-403.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. Song YJ, Yu HH, Kim YJ, Lee NK, Paik HD. 2019. Anti-biofilm activity of grapefruit seed extract against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. J. Mircobiol. Biotechnol. 29: 1177-1183.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Yu HH, Song YJ, Yu HS, Lee NK, Paik HD. 2020. Investigating the antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects of cinnamaldehyde against Campylobacter spp. using cell surface characteristics. J. Food Sci. 85: 157-164.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Badet C, Richard B, Castaing-Debat M, De Flaujac PM, Dorignac G. 2004. Adaptation of salivary Lactobacillus strains to xylitol. Arch. Oral Biol. 49: 161-164.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Taku F, Yutaka T, Tomonori H, Shigetada K, Takashi O, Shizuo S, et al. 1998. Molecular analyses of glucosyltransferase genes among strains of Streptococcus mutans. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 161: 331-336.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Zhang G, Lu M, Liu R, Tian Y, Vu VH, Li Y, et al. 2020. Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation and virulence by Lactobacillus plantarum K41 isolated from traditional sichuan pickles. Front. Microbiol. 11: 774.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Zhang Z, Lyu X, Xu Q, Li C, Lu M, Gong T, et al. 2020. Utilization of the extract of Cedrus deodara (Roxb.Ex D.Don) G. Don against the biofilm formation and the expression of virulence genes of cariogenic bacterium Streptococcus mutans. J. Ethnopharmacol. 257: 112856.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Tahmourespour A, Karsa Kermanshahi R, Salehi R, Nabinezhad AAR. 2008. The relationship between cell surface hydrophobicity and antibiotic resistance of Streptococcal strains isolated from dental plaque and caries. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 10: 251-255.
  24. Fang F, Xu J, Li Q, Xia X, Du G. 2018. Characterization of a Lactobaciilus brevis strain with potential oral probiotic properties. BMC Microbiol. 18: 221.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  25. Yoo Y, Seo DH, Lee H, Cho ES, Song NE, Nam TG, et al. 2019. Inhibitory effect of Bacillus velezensis on biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans. J. Biotechnol. 298: 57-63.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Sun Y, Jiang W, Zhang M, Zhang L, Shen Y, Huang S, et al. 2021. The inhibitory effects of ficin on Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation. Biomed Res. Int. 2021: 6692328.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  27. Jang HJ, Kim JH, Lee NK, Paik HD. 2021. Inhibitory effects of Lactobacillus brevis KU15153 against Streptococcus mutans KCTC 5316 causing dental caries. Microb. Pathog. 157: 104938.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Sambanthamoorthy K, Feng X, Patel R, Patel S, Paranavitana C. 2014. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm potential of biosurfactants isolated from lactobacilli against multi-drug-resistant pathogens. BMC Microbiol. 14: 197.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  29. Jamwal A, Sharma K, Chauhan R, Bansal S, Goel G. 2019. Evaluation of commercial probiotic lactic cultures against biofilm formation by Cronobacter sakazakii. Intest. Res. 17: 192-201.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Tahmourespour A, Salehi R, Kermanshahi RK. 2011. Lactobacillus acidophilus-derived biosurfactant effect on GTFB and GTFC expression level in Streptococcus mutans biofilm cells. Braz. J. Microbiol. 42: 330-339.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Ahn KB, Baik JE, Park OJ, Yun CH, Han SH. 2018. Lactobacillus plantarum lipoteichoic acid inhibits biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans. PLoS One 13: e0192694.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Lin X, Chen X, Tu W, Wang S, Chen H. 2017. Effect of probiotic Lactobacilli on the growth of Streptococcus mutans and multispecies biofilms isolated from children with active caries. Med. Sci. Monit. 23: 4175-4181.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Jeffrey AB. 2004. Virulence properties of Streptococcus. Front. Biosci. 9: 1264-1277.
    Pubmed CrossRef