전체메뉴
검색
Article Search

JMB Journal of Microbiolog and Biotechnology

QR Code QR Code

Research article


References

  1. Candeias NR, Assoah B, Simeonov SP. 2018. Production and synthetic modification of shikimic acid. Chem. Rev. 118: 10458-10550.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Kogure T, Kubota T, Suda M, Hiraga K, Inui M. 2016. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for shikimate overproduction by growth-arrested cell reaction. Metab. Eng. 38: 204-216.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Bochkov DV, Sysolyatin SV, Kalashnikov AI, Surmacheva IA. 2012. Shikimic acid: review of its analytical, isolation, and purification techniques from plant and microbial sources. J. Chem. Biol. 5: 5-17.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  4. Ghosh S, Chisti Y, Banerjee UC. 2012. Production of shikimic acid. Biotechnol. Adv. 30: 1425-1431.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Krämer M, Bongaerts J, Bovenberg R, Kremer S, Müller U, Orf S, et al. 2003. Metabolic engineering for microbial production of shikimic acid. Metab. Eng. 5: 277-283.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Martínez JA, Bolívar F, Escalante A. 2015. Shikimic acid production in Escherichia coli: from classical metabolic engineering strategies to omics applied to improve its production. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 3: 145.
    CrossRef
  7. Rawat G, Tripathi P, Saxena RK. 2013. Expanding horizons of shikimic acid. Recent progresses in production and its endless frontiers in application and market trends. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97: 4277-4287.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Li Z, Wang H, Ding D, Liu Y, Fang H, Chang Z, et al. 2020. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for production of chemicals derived from the shikimate pathway. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 47: 525-535.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Averesch NJH, Krömer JO. 2018. Metabolic engineering of the shikimate pathway for production of aromatics and derived compounds-present and future strain construction strategies. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 6: 32.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  10. Noda S, Shirai T, Oyama S, Kondo A. 2015. Metabolic design of a platform Escherichia coli strain producing various chorismite derivatives. Metab. Eng. 33: 119-129.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Lin Y, Sun X, Yuan Q, Yan Y. 2014. Extending shikimate pathway for the production of muconic acid and its precursor salicylic acid in Escherichia coli. Metab. Eng. 23: 62-69.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Lee HN, Shin WS, Seo SY, Choi SS, Song JS, Kim JY, et al. 2018. Corynebacterium cell factory design and culture process optimization for muconic acid biosynthesis. Sci. Rep. 8: 18041.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  13. Choi S, Lee HN, Park E, Lee SJ, Kim ES. 2020. Recent advances in microbial production of cis,cis-muconic acid. Biomolecules 10: 1238.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  14. Fujiwara R, Noda S, Tanaka T, Kondo A. 2020. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for shikimate pathway derivative production from glucose-xylose co-substrate. Nat. Commun. 11: 279.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  15. Choi SS, Seo SY, Park SO, Lee HN, Song JS, Kim JY, et al. 2019. Cell factory design and culture process optimization for dehydroshikimate biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 7: 241.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  16. Zahoor A, Lindner SN, Wendisch VF. 2012. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum aimed at alternative carbon sources and new products. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 3: e20120004.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  17. Hermann T. 2003. Industrial production of amino acids by coryneform bacteria. J. Biotechnol. 104: 155-172.
    CrossRef
  18. Ikeda M, Takeno S. 2013. Amino acid production by Corynebacterium glutamicum, pp. 107-147. In: Yukawa H, Inui M (eds), Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microbiology Monographs, vol 23. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Germany.
    CrossRef
  19. Jiang Y, Sheng Q, Wu XY, Ye BC, Zhang B. 2021. L-arginine production in Corynebacterium glutamicum: manipulation and optimization of the metabolic process. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 41: 172-185.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Kondoh M, Hirasawa T. 2019. L-Cysteine production by metabolically engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 103: 2609-2619.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Zha J, Zang Y, Mattozzi M, Plassmeier J, Gupta M, Wu X, et al. 2018. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for anthocyanin production. Microb. Cell Fact. 17: 143.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  22. Kallscheuer N, Marienhagen J. 2018. Corynebacterium glutamicum as platform for the production of hydroxybenzoic acids. Microb. Cell Fact. 17: 70.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  23. Joo YC, Ko YJ, You SK, Shin SK, Hyeon JE, Musaad AS, et al. 2018. Creating a new pathway in Corynebacterium glutamicum for the production of taurine as a food additive. J. Agric. Food Chem. 66: 13454-13463.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Chang Z, Dai W, Mao Y, Cui Z, Wang Z, Chen T. 2020. Engineering Corynebacterium glutamicum for the efficient production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid from a mixture of glucose and acetate via the malonyl-CoA pathway. Catalysts 10: 203.
    CrossRef
  25. Jojima T, Inui M, Yukawa H. 2013. Biorefinery applications of Corynebacterium gluamicum, pp. 149-172. In: Yukawa H, Inui M (eds), Corynebacterium gluamicum. Microbiology Monographs, Vol. 23. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Germany.
    CrossRef
  26. Liao HF, Lin LL, Chien HR, Hsu WH. 2001. Serine 187 is a crucial residue for allosteric regulation of Corynebacterium glutamicum 3-deoxy-Darabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate synthase. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 194: 59-64.
    CrossRef
  27. Ger YM, Chen SL, Chiang HJ, Shiuan D. 1994. A single ser-180 mutation desensitizes feedback inhibition of the phenylalaninesensitive 3-Deoxy-D-Arabino-Heptulosonate 7-Phosphate (DAHP) synthetase in Escherichia coli. J. Biochem. 116: 986-990.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Mears L, Stocks SM, Sin G, Gernaey KV. 2017. A review of control strategies for manipulating the feed rate in fed-batch fermentation processes. J. Biotechnol. 245: 34-46.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Kogure T, Inui M. 2018. Recent advances in metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for bioproduction of valueadded aromatic chemicals and natural product. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 102: 8685-8705.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  30. Sambrook JF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual, 2nd Ed. Cold Spring Harbor, New York.

Article

Research article

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021; 31(9): 1305-1310

Published online September 28, 2021 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2106.06009

Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Shikimate Metabolic Pathway Engineering in Corynebacterium glutamicum

Eunhwi Park1†, Hye-Jin Kim1†, Seung-Yeul Seo2, Han-Na Lee2, Si-Sun Choi1, Sang Joung Lee2, and Eung-Soo Kim1*

1Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea
2STR Biotech Co., Ltd., Chuncheon 24232, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to:Eung-Soo Kim,      eungsoo@inha.ac.kr

Received: June 4, 2021; Revised: July 28, 2021; Accepted: August 2, 2021

Abstract

Shikimate is a key high-demand metabolite for synthesizing valuable antiviral drugs, such as the anti-influenza drug, oseltamivir (Tamiflu). Microbial-based strategies for shikimate production have been developed to overcome the unstable and expensive supply of shikimate derived from traditional plant extraction processes. In this study, a microbial cell factory using Corynebacterium glutamicum was designed to overproduce shikimate in a fed-batch culture system. First, the shikimate kinase gene (aroK) responsible for converting shikimate to the next step was disrupted to facilitate the accumulation of shikimate. Several genes encoding the shikimate bypass route, such as dehydroshikimate dehydratase (QsuB), pyruvate kinase (Pyk1), and quinate/shikimate dehydrogenase (QsuD), were disrupted sequentially. An artificial operon containing several shikimate pathway genes, including aroE, aroB, aroF, and aroG were overexpressed to maximize the glucose uptake and intermediate flux. The rationally designed shikimate-overproducing C. glutamicum strain grown in an optimized medium produced approximately 37.3 g/l of shikimate in 7-L fed-batch fermentation. Overall, rational cell factory design and culture process optimization for the microbial-based production of shikimate will play a key role in complementing traditional plant-derived shikimate production processes.

Keywords: Shikimate, metabolic pathway engineering, Corynebacterium, genome editing, fed-batch fermentation

Introduction

Shikimate is a key metabolic intermediate in the shikimate pathways that are indispensable for maintaining the normal metabolism in plants, animals, and microorganisms. It is also a natural substance with high industrial value as a precursor to oseltamivir, an anti-influenza drug known as Tamiflu [1, 2]. Shikimate can be used as an intermediate or versatile chiral precursor to synthesize bio-renewable aromatics and stabilize metal nanoparticles. Current methods of shikimate production include extraction from plant star anise (Illicium verum), chemical synthesis, and fermentation of genetically modified microorganisms [1]. Shikimate production by plant-based extraction and chemical synthesis suffers from low yield and high cost, making it difficult to meet the increasing world demand for Tamiflu since the advent of swine and avian influenza [2-4]. Therefore, the fermentation of an engineered microbial strain utilizing renewable resources, such as glucose, would be an alternative sustainable approach [2-7].

Shikimate is typically synthesized by a series of enzyme-led stepwise bioconversions shown in Fig. 1. 3-Deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate (DAHP) is first produced by the condensation of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and erythrose-4-phosphate (E4P), followed by sequential conversions to 3-dehydroquinate (DHQ), 3-dehydroshikimate (DHS), and shikimate. Shikimate is then transformed further to shikimate-3-phosphate by shikimate kinase encoded by aroK. Shikimate-3-phosphate is then transformed into chorismate, which is finally converted to phenylalanine, tyrosine, tryptophan, and other aromatic products. Several metabolic pathway-engineering attempts have been applied to produce useful aromatic compounds and other chemicals derived from the shikimate pathway [8, 9]. Examples include salicylic acid (SA) [10], muconic acid [11-14], and 3-dehydroshikimate (DHS) [15], which are derived from chorismate and used as precursors in aspirin synthesis.

Figure 1. Pathway engineering strategy for shikimate production in C. glutamicum. (A) Shikimate metabolic pathway in C. glutamicum. The bold arrows and crosses indicate the steps for which corresponding genes were overexpressed and disrupted, individually. The dashed lines represent several catalytic steps. The genes involved in each step are shown in italics. G6P, glucose-6-phosphate; F6P, fructose-6-phosphate; GAP, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; PYR, pyruvate; AcCoA, acetyl-CoA; OAA, oxaloacetate; Ru5P, ribulose-5-phosphate; X5P, xylulose-5-phosphate; R5P, ribose- 5-phosphate; S7P, sedoheptulose-7-phosphate; E4P, erythrose-4-phosphate; DHAP, 3-deoxy-D-arabinoheptulosanate-7- phosphate; DHQ, 3-dehydroquinate; DHS, 3-dehydroshikimate; PCA, protocatechuate. Genes and corresponding enzymes are as follows: pyk1, pyruvate kinase 1; aroF and aroG, DAHP synthase; aroB, 3-dehydroquinate synthase; qsuC, dehydroquinate dehydratase; aroE, shikimate dehydrogenase; aroK, shikimate kinase; qsuD, quinate/shikimate dehydrogenase; qsuB, dehydroshikimate dehydratase. (B) Gene disruption in C. glutamicum ATCC13032 and plasmid construction. The constructed plasmids were introduced and replicated in Inha304, yielding Inha305, Inha306, Inha307, Inha308, Inha309, and Inha310, respectively. CaroE and EaroE, shikimate dehydrogenase from C. glutamicum ATCC13032 and E. coli K-12, respectively; aroFS188C, DAHP synthase carrying S188C mutation; EaroGS180F, DAHP synthase carrying S180F mutation.

Corynebacterium glutamicum is a general-regarded-as-safe (GRAS) microorganism that is used industrially for amino acid production. The microorganism has been reported to produce more than two million tones of L-glutamate and one and a half tons of L-lysine annually [16-18]. It has also been used as a host to produce L-arginine [19], L-cysteine [20], anthocyanin [21], hydroxybenzoic acid [22], taurine [23], and 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP)[24], as well as the lignocellulose-based production of fuels and chemicals in biorefineries [25]. Moreover, rationally genome-redesigned C. glutamicum produced approximately 38 g/L of muconic acid in 7-L fed-batch fermentation, suggesting that C. glutamicum could be an ideal bacterial host for an artificial cell factory design [12].

In the present study, a shikimate high-producing C. glutamicum strain was constructed by shikimate pathway engineering for 7-L fed-batch fermentation. These results suggest that the Corynebacterium cell factory design for a shikimate-overproducing strain would be valuable for constructing a microorganism-based high-producing strain for aromatic compounds with industrial value.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

Table 1 lists all bacterial strains used in this study. E. coli DH5α was used for genetic manipulation and grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium at 37°C with the appropriate antibiotics. The C. glutamicum strains were cultivated in a brain heart infusion (BHI) medium and BHIS (BHI medium containing 91 g/l sorbitol) at 30°C. The preparation of shikimate production media and cultivations for C. glutamicum were performed as previously described [12].

Table 1 . Strains and plasmids used in this study..

Strain or plasmidCharacteristicsSources or reference
C. glutamicum ATCC13032
Inha301aroK(NCgl1560)This study
Inha302aroK(NCgl1560)△qsuB(NCgl0407)This study
Inha303aroK(NCgl1560)△qsuB(NCgl0407)△pyk1(NCgl2008)This study
Inha304aroK(NCgl1560)△qsuB(NCgl0407)△pyk1(NCgl2008)△qsuD(NCgl0409)This study
Inha305Inha304 with pCaroEThis study
Inha306Inha304 with pEaroEThis study
Inha307Inha304 with pECThis study
Inha308Inha304 with pECBThis study
Inha309Inha304 with pECBFThis study
Inha310Inha304 with pECBFGThis study
Plasmid
pK19mobsacBVector for the construction of disruption mutants of C. glutamicum[30]
pSK003E. coli-C. glutamicum shuttle vector harboring sod promoter)This study
pCaroEpSK003 carrying the aroE gene from C. glutamicum ATCC13032This study
pEaroEpSK003 carrying the aroE gene from E. coli K-12This study
pECpEaroE carrying the qsuC gene (NCgl0408) from C. glutamicum ATCC13032This study
pECBpEC carrying the aroB gene (NCgl1559) from C. glutamicum ATCC13032This study
pECBFpECB carrying the aroF gene (NCgl0950) carrying S188C mutationThis study
pECBFGpECBF carrying the aroG gene from E. coli K-12 carrying S180F mutationThis study


Construction of Plasmid and Strains

Table 1 presents the constructed plasmids, and Table S1 lists all primer pairs used in this study. For markerless target gene disruption, pK19mobsacB was used, and the plasmids of pCaroE, pEaroE, pE, pEC, pECB, pECBF, and pECBFG were constructed for gene overexpression, which was controlled under the sod promoter. Target gene disruption was verified by colony PCR using each primer set. For overexpression, the aroE genes from C. glutamicum and E. coli were amplified by PCR and inserted into pSK003 using an In-Fusion cloning kit (TaKaRa, Japan), yielding pCaroE and pEaroE, respectively. The qsuC, aroB genes were cloned individually into pEaroE to generate pEC and pECB. A three-way PCR method was used for the site-directed mutagenesis of the aroF gene from C. glutamicum and aroG gene from E. coli, and the aroFS188C fragment and EaroGS180F were inserted sequentially into pECB, yielding pECBF and pECBFG. The constructed plasmids were introduced individually into C. glutamicum strains via electroporation as described [12].

Shikimate and Dehydroshikimate (DHS) Analyses

Cultured broth samples were centrifuged (4°C, 15,000 RPM for 7 min), and only the supernatant was diluted and purified using a membrane filter (Nylaflo nylon membrane filter) for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The concentrations of shikimate and DHS were determined by HPLC using an Aminex HPX-87H column (Bio-Rad). The column was heated to 50°C to detect shikimate and DHS. The mobile phase was 2.5 mM H2SO4, and the flow rate was 0.5 ml/min for shikimate. Shikimate and DHS were detected at 215 nm and 236 nm, respectively.

Results and Discussion

Engineering of the Shikimate Pathway in C. glutamicum ATCC13032

The shikimate pathway of C. glutamicum was engineered to build a shikimate high-production strain. To construct a Corynebacterium strain that could accumulate shikimate, aroK (NCgl1560) encoding shikimate kinase, which mediates the conversion of shikimate to shikimate-3-phosphate, was first disrupted (named Inha301) and confirmed to produce 0.8 g/l of shikimate (Figs. 1 and 2A). qsuB (NCgl0407) was then deleted (named Inha302) to accumulate the key precursor, dehydroshikimate dehydrate (DHS), blocking DHS conversion to protocatechuate (PCA). Approximately, 0.98 g/l of DHS was accumulated in the Inha302 strain, which is 1.97 times higher than 0.5 g/l of DHS produced in Inha301 (Fig. 2A). In addition, the pyruvate kinase gene (Pyk1, NCgl2008) was removed (named Inha303) for the build-up of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), resulting in 1.33 g/l of DHS and 0.95 g/l of shikimate (Fig. 2A). Finally, the quinate/shikimate dehydrogenase gene (qsuD) involved in the conversion of 3-dehydroquinate (DHQ) and quinate was deleted (named Inha304) to produce 1.32 g/l of shikimate (Fig. 2A). Thus, the sequential elimination of the aroK, qsuB, pyk1, and qusD genes could be inferred by a reasonable pathway engineering method for shikimate high production.

Figure 2. Metabolite production yield in recombinant C. glutamicum strains. (A) Cell growth (top) and shikimate and dehydroshikimate (DHS) production yield (bottom) in target gene deleted C. glutamicum strains; Inha301, Inha302, Inha303, and Inha304. (B) Cell growth (top) and HPLC analysis of shikimate and dehydroshikimate (DHS) production (bottom) in the Inha304 harboring empty vector, pSK003, and target gene overexpressed, individually; Inha305, Inha306, Inha307, Inha308, Inha309, and Inha310. The values represent the means and standard deviations of duplicate cultivations.

Overexpression of the Shikimate Pathway Genes to Enhance Shikimate Production

Several key genes involved in shikimate biosynthesis, such as aroE, qsuC, aroB, aroF, and aroG, were overexpressed sequentially in the above-constructed four-genes KO stain, Inha304, to maximize the metabolite flux in the shikimate pathway. Five shikimate pathway genes (aoE, qsuC, aroB, aroF, and aroG) were over-expressed as a single operon under the strong sod promoter, resulting in the simple and rapid construction of a shikimate high-production strain.

Because significant amounts of DHS accumulated in Inha304, as shown in Fig. 2A, the over-expression of AroE, a shikimate dehydrogenase involved in bioconversion from DHS to shikimate, was first attempted in Inha304. For more efficient AroE expression, C. glutamicum-derived aroE (NCgl1567) and E. coli-derived aroE were introduced in Inha304 to build Inha305 and Inha306, respectively, and compare the conversion rate to shikimate. As shown in Fig. 2B, 1.55 g/l of shikimate was detected in Inha306, which is 1.11 times higher than 1.39 g/l of shikimate in Inha305, suggesting that AroE of E. coli might have better enzyme kinetic characteristics. The dehydroquinate dehydrate gene (qsuC, NCgl0408) involved in the reaction between 3-dehydroquinate (DHQ) and DHS, and the dehydroquinate synthase gene (aroB, NCgl1559) involved in bioconversion from 3-deoxy-D-arabinoheptulosanate to DHQ were sequentially expressed in Inha306, resulting in Inha307 and Inha308, respectively. Inha307 showed a 1.6-fold increase in shikimate production (2.51 g/l) compared to Inha306 (1.55 g/l), and Inha308 showed a 1.4- and 1.8-fold increase in DHS (1.05 g/l) and shikimate (4.59 g/l) production compared to Inha307, respectively (Fig. 2). Point mutations to the DHAP synthases aroF and aroG, which are involved in the biosynthesis of DHAP from PEP and E4P, have been reported to induce a higher resistance to feedback inhibition [26, 27]. Hence, the Inha309 strain containing C. glutamicum-derived aroF with a serine to cysteine mutation at the 188 position, and the Inha310 strain containing the E. coli-derived aroG with a serine to phenylalanine mutation at the 180 position, were used. As a result, Inha309 produced 1.19 g/l of DHS and 4.72 g/l of shikimate, and Inha310 exhibited the highest production yields of 0.69 g/l of DHS and 8.23 g/l of shikimate (Fig. 2B). These results suggest that the pathway engineering strategy described here is a fast and effective approach for shikimate over-production in C. glutamicum.

Fed-Batch Fermentation of Inha310

A 5 L batch fermentation was performed to calculate the feeding medium flow rate for the fed-batch fermentation of the Inha310 strain. The formula for calculating the feed medium flow rate is as follows. [F] = Qs[V]/[S0] [28]. Qs, V, and S0 are the initial glucose concentration (g/l)/glucose consumption rate (h), the initial volume of the feeding medium, and glucose concentration of the feeding medium, respectively. Therefore, Inha310 consumed all the glucose in a 2 L feeding medium containing 55 g/l of glucose for 24 h. Hence, the calculated feeding medium flow rate was at least 0.185 ml/min based on the above formula. After 16-h of 1st seed culture and 6-h of 2nd seed culture, the Inha310 culture was inoculated into a 5 L fermenter. The feeding medium was added at 33.5 h at a rate of 0.189 ml/min whenever the glucose concentration decreased below 10 g/l during 104.5 h fermentation. As a result, the Inha310 continued to grow during the entire fed-batch fermentation period, and the production of shikimate increased accordingly, finally reaching up to 37.3 g/l (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Time-course profiles of cell growth (Dry cell weight) and glucose concentrations and metabolite production by Inha310 in a 7-L bioreactor. The feeding medium was injected at 33.5, 44.5, 56.5, 68.5, 80.5, and 92.5 h (indicated with gray arrow), at a rate of 0.189 ,0.246, 0.321, 0.416, 0.548, and 0.699 ml/min, respectively.

Similar strategies for shikimate overproduction have been attempted in E. coli and Bacillus subtilis strains, but at a low titer to meet commercial applications [29]. Among the results reported thus far, one of the best titers related to shikimate production is through metabolically engineered C. glutamicum in a growth-arrested cell reaction with 141 g/l of shikimate [2]. The shikimate titer should not be compared directly because the fed-batch system described here is quite different from the previously reported cell-arrest culture process. In the future, improvement in the key enzymes through protein engineering, optimization of transcription and translation processes through promoter and ribosomal binding site (RBS) optimization, and stable chromosomal DNA integration will enable the establishment of a more stable shikimate hyper-production strain.

Supplemental Materials

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out with the support of "Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ01563901)" Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), and the Center for Women In Science, Engineering and Technology (WISET-2021-043) Grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT(MSIT) under the Program for Returners into R&D.

Conflict of Interest


The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Pathway engineering strategy for shikimate production in C. glutamicum. (A) Shikimate metabolic pathway in C. glutamicum. The bold arrows and crosses indicate the steps for which corresponding genes were overexpressed and disrupted, individually. The dashed lines represent several catalytic steps. The genes involved in each step are shown in italics. G6P, glucose-6-phosphate; F6P, fructose-6-phosphate; GAP, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; PYR, pyruvate; AcCoA, acetyl-CoA; OAA, oxaloacetate; Ru5P, ribulose-5-phosphate; X5P, xylulose-5-phosphate; R5P, ribose- 5-phosphate; S7P, sedoheptulose-7-phosphate; E4P, erythrose-4-phosphate; DHAP, 3-deoxy-D-arabinoheptulosanate-7- phosphate; DHQ, 3-dehydroquinate; DHS, 3-dehydroshikimate; PCA, protocatechuate. Genes and corresponding enzymes are as follows: pyk1, pyruvate kinase 1; aroF and aroG, DAHP synthase; aroB, 3-dehydroquinate synthase; qsuC, dehydroquinate dehydratase; aroE, shikimate dehydrogenase; aroK, shikimate kinase; qsuD, quinate/shikimate dehydrogenase; qsuB, dehydroshikimate dehydratase. (B) Gene disruption in C. glutamicum ATCC13032 and plasmid construction. The constructed plasmids were introduced and replicated in Inha304, yielding Inha305, Inha306, Inha307, Inha308, Inha309, and Inha310, respectively. CaroE and EaroE, shikimate dehydrogenase from C. glutamicum ATCC13032 and E. coli K-12, respectively; aroFS188C, DAHP synthase carrying S188C mutation; EaroGS180F, DAHP synthase carrying S180F mutation.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2021; 31: 1305-1310https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2106.06009

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Metabolite production yield in recombinant C. glutamicum strains. (A) Cell growth (top) and shikimate and dehydroshikimate (DHS) production yield (bottom) in target gene deleted C. glutamicum strains; Inha301, Inha302, Inha303, and Inha304. (B) Cell growth (top) and HPLC analysis of shikimate and dehydroshikimate (DHS) production (bottom) in the Inha304 harboring empty vector, pSK003, and target gene overexpressed, individually; Inha305, Inha306, Inha307, Inha308, Inha309, and Inha310. The values represent the means and standard deviations of duplicate cultivations.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2021; 31: 1305-1310https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2106.06009

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Time-course profiles of cell growth (Dry cell weight) and glucose concentrations and metabolite production by Inha310 in a 7-L bioreactor. The feeding medium was injected at 33.5, 44.5, 56.5, 68.5, 80.5, and 92.5 h (indicated with gray arrow), at a rate of 0.189 ,0.246, 0.321, 0.416, 0.548, and 0.699 ml/min, respectively.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2021; 31: 1305-1310https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2106.06009

Table 1 . Strains and plasmids used in this study..

Strain or plasmidCharacteristicsSources or reference
C. glutamicum ATCC13032
Inha301aroK(NCgl1560)This study
Inha302aroK(NCgl1560)△qsuB(NCgl0407)This study
Inha303aroK(NCgl1560)△qsuB(NCgl0407)△pyk1(NCgl2008)This study
Inha304aroK(NCgl1560)△qsuB(NCgl0407)△pyk1(NCgl2008)△qsuD(NCgl0409)This study
Inha305Inha304 with pCaroEThis study
Inha306Inha304 with pEaroEThis study
Inha307Inha304 with pECThis study
Inha308Inha304 with pECBThis study
Inha309Inha304 with pECBFThis study
Inha310Inha304 with pECBFGThis study
Plasmid
pK19mobsacBVector for the construction of disruption mutants of C. glutamicum[30]
pSK003E. coli-C. glutamicum shuttle vector harboring sod promoter)This study
pCaroEpSK003 carrying the aroE gene from C. glutamicum ATCC13032This study
pEaroEpSK003 carrying the aroE gene from E. coli K-12This study
pECpEaroE carrying the qsuC gene (NCgl0408) from C. glutamicum ATCC13032This study
pECBpEC carrying the aroB gene (NCgl1559) from C. glutamicum ATCC13032This study
pECBFpECB carrying the aroF gene (NCgl0950) carrying S188C mutationThis study
pECBFGpECBF carrying the aroG gene from E. coli K-12 carrying S180F mutationThis study

References

  1. Candeias NR, Assoah B, Simeonov SP. 2018. Production and synthetic modification of shikimic acid. Chem. Rev. 118: 10458-10550.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Kogure T, Kubota T, Suda M, Hiraga K, Inui M. 2016. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for shikimate overproduction by growth-arrested cell reaction. Metab. Eng. 38: 204-216.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Bochkov DV, Sysolyatin SV, Kalashnikov AI, Surmacheva IA. 2012. Shikimic acid: review of its analytical, isolation, and purification techniques from plant and microbial sources. J. Chem. Biol. 5: 5-17.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Ghosh S, Chisti Y, Banerjee UC. 2012. Production of shikimic acid. Biotechnol. Adv. 30: 1425-1431.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Krämer M, Bongaerts J, Bovenberg R, Kremer S, Müller U, Orf S, et al. 2003. Metabolic engineering for microbial production of shikimic acid. Metab. Eng. 5: 277-283.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Martínez JA, Bolívar F, Escalante A. 2015. Shikimic acid production in Escherichia coli: from classical metabolic engineering strategies to omics applied to improve its production. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 3: 145.
    CrossRef
  7. Rawat G, Tripathi P, Saxena RK. 2013. Expanding horizons of shikimic acid. Recent progresses in production and its endless frontiers in application and market trends. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97: 4277-4287.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Li Z, Wang H, Ding D, Liu Y, Fang H, Chang Z, et al. 2020. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for production of chemicals derived from the shikimate pathway. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 47: 525-535.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Averesch NJH, Krömer JO. 2018. Metabolic engineering of the shikimate pathway for production of aromatics and derived compounds-present and future strain construction strategies. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 6: 32.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Noda S, Shirai T, Oyama S, Kondo A. 2015. Metabolic design of a platform Escherichia coli strain producing various chorismite derivatives. Metab. Eng. 33: 119-129.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Lin Y, Sun X, Yuan Q, Yan Y. 2014. Extending shikimate pathway for the production of muconic acid and its precursor salicylic acid in Escherichia coli. Metab. Eng. 23: 62-69.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Lee HN, Shin WS, Seo SY, Choi SS, Song JS, Kim JY, et al. 2018. Corynebacterium cell factory design and culture process optimization for muconic acid biosynthesis. Sci. Rep. 8: 18041.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Choi S, Lee HN, Park E, Lee SJ, Kim ES. 2020. Recent advances in microbial production of cis,cis-muconic acid. Biomolecules 10: 1238.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Fujiwara R, Noda S, Tanaka T, Kondo A. 2020. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for shikimate pathway derivative production from glucose-xylose co-substrate. Nat. Commun. 11: 279.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Choi SS, Seo SY, Park SO, Lee HN, Song JS, Kim JY, et al. 2019. Cell factory design and culture process optimization for dehydroshikimate biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 7: 241.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. Zahoor A, Lindner SN, Wendisch VF. 2012. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum aimed at alternative carbon sources and new products. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 3: e20120004.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. Hermann T. 2003. Industrial production of amino acids by coryneform bacteria. J. Biotechnol. 104: 155-172.
    CrossRef
  18. Ikeda M, Takeno S. 2013. Amino acid production by Corynebacterium glutamicum, pp. 107-147. In: Yukawa H, Inui M (eds), Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microbiology Monographs, vol 23. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Germany.
    CrossRef
  19. Jiang Y, Sheng Q, Wu XY, Ye BC, Zhang B. 2021. L-arginine production in Corynebacterium glutamicum: manipulation and optimization of the metabolic process. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 41: 172-185.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Kondoh M, Hirasawa T. 2019. L-Cysteine production by metabolically engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 103: 2609-2619.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Zha J, Zang Y, Mattozzi M, Plassmeier J, Gupta M, Wu X, et al. 2018. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for anthocyanin production. Microb. Cell Fact. 17: 143.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Kallscheuer N, Marienhagen J. 2018. Corynebacterium glutamicum as platform for the production of hydroxybenzoic acids. Microb. Cell Fact. 17: 70.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Joo YC, Ko YJ, You SK, Shin SK, Hyeon JE, Musaad AS, et al. 2018. Creating a new pathway in Corynebacterium glutamicum for the production of taurine as a food additive. J. Agric. Food Chem. 66: 13454-13463.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Chang Z, Dai W, Mao Y, Cui Z, Wang Z, Chen T. 2020. Engineering Corynebacterium glutamicum for the efficient production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid from a mixture of glucose and acetate via the malonyl-CoA pathway. Catalysts 10: 203.
    CrossRef
  25. Jojima T, Inui M, Yukawa H. 2013. Biorefinery applications of Corynebacterium gluamicum, pp. 149-172. In: Yukawa H, Inui M (eds), Corynebacterium gluamicum. Microbiology Monographs, Vol. 23. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Germany.
    CrossRef
  26. Liao HF, Lin LL, Chien HR, Hsu WH. 2001. Serine 187 is a crucial residue for allosteric regulation of Corynebacterium glutamicum 3-deoxy-Darabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate synthase. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 194: 59-64.
    CrossRef
  27. Ger YM, Chen SL, Chiang HJ, Shiuan D. 1994. A single ser-180 mutation desensitizes feedback inhibition of the phenylalaninesensitive 3-Deoxy-D-Arabino-Heptulosonate 7-Phosphate (DAHP) synthetase in Escherichia coli. J. Biochem. 116: 986-990.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Mears L, Stocks SM, Sin G, Gernaey KV. 2017. A review of control strategies for manipulating the feed rate in fed-batch fermentation processes. J. Biotechnol. 245: 34-46.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Kogure T, Inui M. 2018. Recent advances in metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for bioproduction of valueadded aromatic chemicals and natural product. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 102: 8685-8705.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  30. Sambrook JF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual, 2nd Ed. Cold Spring Harbor, New York.