전체메뉴
검색
Article Search

JMB Journal of Microbiolog and Biotechnology

QR Code QR Code

Research article


References

  1. Cai D, Rao Y, Zhan Y, Wang Q, Chen S. 2019. Engineering bacillus for efficient production of heterologous protein: current progress, challenge and prospect. J. Appl. Microbiol. 126: 1632-1642.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Nicholson WL. 2002. Roles of Bacillus endospores in the environment. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 59: 410-416.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Abriouel H, Franz CMAP, Ben ON, Gálvez A. 2011. Diversity and applications of Bacillus bacteriocins. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 35: 201-232.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Jeżewska-Frąckowiak J, Seroczyńska K, Banaszczyk J, Jedrzejczak G, Żylicz-Stachula A, Skowron PM. 2018. The promises and risks of probiotic Bacillus species. Acta Biochim. Pol. 65: 509-519.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Lopes R, Tsui S, Goncalves PJRO, de Queiroz MV. 2018. A look into a multifunctional toolbox: endophytic Bacillus species provide broad and underexploited benefits for plants. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 34: 94.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Saxena AK, Kumar M, Chakdar H, Anuroopa N, Bagyaraj DJ. 2020. Bacillus species in soil as a natural resource for plant health and nutrition. J. Appl. Microbiol. 128: 1583-1594.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Radhakrishnan R, Hashem A, Abd Allah EF. 2017. Bacillus: a biological tool for crop improvement through bio-molecular changes in adverse environments. Front. Physiol. 8: 667.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  8. Miljakovi D, Marinkovi J, Baleevi-Tubi S. 2020. The significance of Bacillus spp. in disease suppression and growth promotion of field and vegetable crops. Microorganisms 8: 1037.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  9. Berendsen RL, Pieterse CMJ, Bakker PAHM. 2012. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 17: 478-486.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Jin H, Dong D, Yang Q. 2016. Salt-responsive transcriptome profiling of Suaeda glauca via RNA sequencing. PLoS One 11: e0150504.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  11. Cui LJ, Pan X, Li W, Zhang XD, Liu GF, Song YB, et al. 2019. Phragmites australis meets Suaeda salsa on the "red beach": effects of an ecosystem engineer on salt-marsh litter decomposition. Sci. Total Environ. 693: 133477.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Duan HM, Ma YH, Liu RR, Li Q, Yang Y, Song J. 2018. Effect of combined waterlogging and salinity stresses on euhalophyte Suaeda glauca. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 127: 231-237.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Zhang HG, Yang BR, Chen AH, Liang HX. 2017. Soil microbial diversity of marshes covered by Suaeda salsa and Spartina alternifora in Yancheng Wetland. Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol. 16: 1113-1119.
  14. Xu ZK, Shao TY, Lv ZX, Yue Y, Liu AH, Long XH, et al. 2020. The mechanisms of improving coastal saline soils by planting rice. Sci. Total Environ. 703: 135529.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Rath M, Mitchell TR, Gold SE. 2018. Volatiles produced by Bacillus mojavensis RRC101 act as plant growth modulators and are strongly culture-dependent. Microbiol. Res. 208: 76-84.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Nishijima T, Toyota K, Mochizuki M. 2005. Predominant culturable Bacillus species in Japanese arable soils and their potential as biocontrol agents. Microbes Environ. 20: 61-68.
    CrossRef
  17. Sha YX, Zeng QC, Sui ST. 2020. Screening and application of Bacillus strains isolated from nonrhizospheric rice soil for the biocontrol of rice blast. Plant Pathol. 36: 231-243.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  18. Ki JS, Zhang W, Qian PY. 2009. Discovery of marine Bacillus species by 16S rRNA and rpoB comparisons and their usefulness for species identification. J. Microbiol. Methods 77: 48-57.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Jing CL, Xu ZC, Zou P, Tang Q, Li YQ, You XW, et al. 2019. Coastal halophytes alter properties and microbial community structure of the saline soils in the Yellow River Delta, China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 134: 1-7.
    CrossRef
  20. Khan AG. 2005. Role of soil microbes in the rhizospheres of plants growing on trace metal contaminated soils in phytoremediation. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 18: 355-364.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Fayez R, Salek-Gilani S. 2018. The potential activity of soil extracellular enzymes as an indicator for ecological restoration of rangeland soil after agricultural abandonment. Appl. Soil Ecol. 126: 140-147.
    CrossRef
  22. Shen Q, Hao YQ, Xu XH, Xu YD, Yang JY, Chu WY, et al. 2020. Analysis of rhizosphere bacterial diversity in Suaeda glauca Bunge based on high-throughput sequencing. J. Zhejiang Sci-Tech University 43: 671-677.
  23. López-Angulo J, de la Cruz M, Chacón-Labella J, Illuminati A, Matesanz S, Pescador DS, et al. 2020. The role of root community attributes in predicting soil fungal and bacterial community patterns. New Phytol. 228: 1070-1082.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Yamamoto K, Shiwa Y, Ishige T, Sakamoto H, Tanaka K, Uchino M, et al. 2018. Bacterial diversity associated with the rhizosphere and endosphere of two halophytes: Glaux maritima and Salicornia europaea. Front. Microbiol. 9: 2878.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  25. Bouizgarne B. 2013. Bacteria for plant growth promotion and disease management, pp. 15-47. In: Maheshwari D (ed), Bacteria in Agrobiology: Disease Management, 2nd Ed. Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht, London.
    CrossRef
  26. Mukhtar S, Ishaq A, Hassan S, Mehnaz S, Mirza MS, Malik KA. 2017. Comparison of microbial communities associated with halophyte (Salsola stocksii) and non-halophyte (Triticum aestivum) using culture-independent approaches. Pol. J. Microbiol. 66: 353-364.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Shi YW, Lou K, Li C, Wang L, Zhao ZY, Zhao S, et al. 2015. Illumina based analysis of bacterial diversity related to halophytes Salicornia europaea and Sueada aralocaspica. J. Microbiol. 53: 678-685.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Tian XY, Zhang CS. 2017. Illumina-based analysis of endophytic and rhizosphere bacterial diversity of the coastal halophyte Messerschmidia sibirica. Front. Microbiol. 8: 2288.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  29. Brack C, Mikolasch A, Schlueter R, Otto A, Becher D, Wegner U, et al. 2015. Antibacterial metabolites and bacteriolytic enzymes produced by Bacillus pumilus during bacteriolysis of Arthrobacter citreus. Mar. Biotechnol. 17: 290-304.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  30. Schinke C, Martins T, Queiroz SCN, Melo IS, Reyes FGR. 2017. Antibacterial compounds from marine bacteria, 2010-2015. J. Nat. Prod. 80: 1215-1228.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Fira D, Dimkic I, Beric T, Lozo J, Stankovic S. 2018. Biological control of plant pathogens by Bacillus species. J. Biotechnol. 285: 44-55.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Bais HP, Fall R, Vivanco JM. 2004. Biocontrol of Bacillus subtilis against infection of Arabidopsis roots by Pseudomonas syringae is facilitated by bioflm formation and surfactin production. Plant Physiol. 134: 307-319.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  33. Kupper KC, Corrêa FE, Azevedo FA, Silva AC. 2012. Bacillus subtilis to biological control of postbloom fruit drop caused by Colletotrichum acutatum under feld conditions. Sci. Hortic. 134: 139-143.
    CrossRef
  34. Kupper KC, Moretto RK, Fujimoto A. 2020. Production of antifungal compounds by Bacillus spp. isolates and its capacity for controlling citrus black spot under field conditions. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 36: 1.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Asari S, S Matzén, Petersen MA, Bejai S, Meijer J, Sessitsch A. 2016. Multiple effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens volatile compounds: plant growth promotion and growth inhibition of phytopathogens. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 92: iw070.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Leelasuphakul W, Hemmanee P, Chuenchitt S. 2008. Growth inhibitory properties of Bacillus subtilis strains and their metabolites against the green mold pathogen (penicillium digitatum sacc.) of citrus fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 48: 113-121.
    CrossRef
  37. Zhu L, Liu N, Wang H, Zhang Z, Jiang L, Huang H. 2019. Draft genome sequence of broad-spectrum antifungal-producing Bacillus velezensis C4341 isolated from a saline-alkali soil sample in China. J. Glob. Antbimicrob. Resist. 16: 291-293.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Kushwaha P, Kashyap PL, Srivastava AK, Tiwari RK. 2020. Plant growth promoting and antifungal activity in endophytic Bacillus strains from pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Braz. J. Microbiol. 51: 229-241.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  39. Singh RK, Singh P, Li HB, Song QQ, Guo DJ, Solanki MK, et al. 2020. Diversity of nitrogen-fixing rhizobacteria associated with sugarcane: a comprehensive study of plant-microbe interactions for growth enhancement in Saccharum spp. BMC Plant Biol. 20: 220.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  40. Hong Y, Ma Y, Wu L, Maki M, Qin W, Chen S. 2012. Characterization and analysis of nifH genes from Paenibacillus sabinae T27. Microbiol. Res. 167: 596-60.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Szymańska S, Płociniczak T, Piotrowska-Seget Z, Hrynkiewicz K. 2016. Endophytic and rhizosphere bacteria associated with the roots of the halophyte Salicornia europaea L.-community structure and metabolic potential. Microbiol. Res. 192: 37-51.
    Pubmed CrossRef

Related articles in JMB

More Related Articles

Article

Research article

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021; 31(9): 1231-1240

Published online September 28, 2021 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2105.05010

Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Profiles of Bacillus spp. Isolated from the Rhizosphere of Suaeda glauca and Their Potential to Promote Plant Growth and Suppress Fungal Phytopathogens

Ping Lu1, Ke Jiang1, Ya-Qiao Hao1,2, Wan-Ying Chu1, Yu-Dong Xu1, Jia-Yao Yang1, Jia-Le Chen1, Guo-Hong Zeng1, Zhou-Hang Gu1*, and Hong-Xin Zhao1*

1Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Plant Secondary Metabolism and Regulation, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, P.R. China
2Experimental Teaching Center, College of Life Science, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034, P.R. China

Correspondence to:Zhou-Hang Gu,    hzgu@zstu.edu.cn
Hong-Xin Zhao,        bxxbj2003@sina.com     

Received: May 10, 2021; Revised: July 11, 2021; Accepted: July 12, 2021

Abstract

Members of the genus Bacillus are known to play an important role in promoting plant growth and protecting plants against phytopathogenic microorganisms. In this study, 21 isolates of Bacillus spp. were obtained from the root micro-ecosystem of Suaeda glauca. Analysis of the 16S rRNA genes indicated that the isolates belong to the species Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus velezensis, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus aryabhattai and Brevibacterium frigoritolerans. One of the interesting findings of this study is that the four strains B1, B5, B16 and B21 are dominant in rhizosphere soil. Based on gyrA, gyrB, and rpoB gene analyses, B1, B5, and B21 were identified as B. amyloliquefaciens and B16 was identified as B. velezensis. Estimation of antifungal activity showed that the isolate B1 had a significant inhibitory effect on Fusarium verticillioides, B5 and B16 on Colletotrichum capsici (syd.) Butl, and B21 on Rhizoctonia cerealis van der Hoeven. The four strains grew well in medium with 1-10% NaCl, a pH value of 5-8, and promoted the growth of Arabidopsis thaliana. Our results indicate that these strains may be promising agents for the biocontrol and promotion of plant growth and further study of the relevant bacteria will provide a useful reference for the development of microbial resources.

Keywords: Bacillus spp., Suaeda glauca, plant biocontrol, plant growth promotion, Arabidopsis thaliana

Introduction

Bacillus species are a group of gram-positive bacteria widely existing in nature [1]. They can produce notable and useful secondary metabolites and are found in diverse environments such as water, soil, vegetation, and even the gastrointestinal tracts of various insects and mammals [2]. This ability to survive and grow in such varied ecosystems is based on the production of endospores that are highly resistant to unfavorable environmental conditions, in addition to their diverse physiological properties and growth requirements [3, 4]. When Bacillus species are applied in agriculture, they can bring all kinds of benefits to plants, including strengthening resistance to disease caused by plant phytopathogenic fungi and bacteria, or insects and nematodes [5]. At the same time, they can improve tolerance to stress while promoting plant growth and being eco-friendly [5, 6]. Many species of Bacillus have been found to secrete gibberellins, plant hormones such as Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), and some nutrient-solubilizing enzymes that promote the rapid growth of plants [7]. Some physiological changes when plants were inoculated with Bacillus spp. in a stress environment slow down plant senescence [7]. Bacilli also secrete secondary metabolites such as antibiotics, siderophores, and cell wall hydrolases, which contribute to their antagonistic effects against pathogens [5, 8]. In addition, Bacillus spp. can elicit systemic resistance to improve plant resistance against subsequent pathogen attack [8]. It is well known that the roots of plants in the soil are colonized by a plethora of different bacteria and fungi which are largely affected by the physical and chemical properties of the soil and plant genotypes [9, 10]. However, few reports have investigated the rhizospheric and rhizophilous bacterial microflora in the root micro-ecosystems of halophytes.

Suaeda glauca is a succulent obligate halophyte from the family Chenopodiaceae, and one of the few plant species that can live in highly saline and alkaline soils [11]. It is a significant pioneer species in coastal wetlands of East Asia, and is widely distributed in coastal areas of China [12]. What’s more, it is not only an indicator of saline soils but also an ideal plant variety for improving the arability of saline-alkali soils and phytoremediation [11, 13]. The introduction of halophytes such as S. glauca is beneficial for increasing land utilization rates, enhancing the value of saline and solonetzic soils, and economical remediation of mine tailings [12]. In addition to efficiently reducing the salt content of topsoil in which it is cultivated, S. glauca can increase the content of organic matter content as well as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium levels in the soil, which generates economic, ecological and social benefits [14, 15]. These extremely advantageous characteristics make this plant a mighty candidate for saline alkali agriculture and an important source of salt and drought tolerant bacteria, which is why we chose this plant in our research.

In the present study, we set out to explore the diversity of Bacillus species and find novel functional strains. We isolated typical Bacillus spp. from the root micro-ecosystem of S. glauca Bunge, which develops naturally in saline and solonetzic soils with high tolerance of the relatively harsh environmental conditions of Red Beach at Panjin in Liaoning Province (40°41’-41°27’N, 121°31’-122°28’E), which is one of the best preserved wetlands in China. The antimicrobial activity and plant growth-promoting effects of selected strains were characterized, and four selected strains were analyzed in more detail. This study provides a reference for exploiting novel microbial resources and as well as for future investigations of the relationship between the dominant plants and associated microorganisms in saline-alkali soils.

Materials and Methods

Reagents and Culture Media

The Qubit 2.0 DNA Kit used for genomic DNA isolation was purchased from NEB (USA). The Taq DNA Polymerase and High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase used for the amplification of 16S rRNA genes were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (USA). The DNA gel extraction kit was purchased from GenScript (USA). Unless specifically noted, all other chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (USA).

Luria-Bertani (LB) broth containing 10 g/l tryptone, 5 g/l yeast extract, and 10 g/l NaCl was used for the general cultivation of bacteria or bacterial isolates. Bacillus spp. were grown in LB medium at 30 or 37°C. Potato dextrose agar (PDA) containing 200 g peeled potatoes, 20 g glucose, 15 g agar, and 1,000 ml water was used for culturing plant pathogenic fungi. Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a plant growth medium [16].

Sample Collection and Isolation of Bacillus spp.

Eight S. glauca Bunge and soil collection sites and ten samples of soil were selected at Red Beach (40°41’-41°27’N, 121°31’-122°28’E). Samples of S. glauca Bunge with rhizosphere soil samples were collected from different soil depths (0-10 cm) and stored at 4°C.

Bacillus strains were isolated from ten samples by serial dilution in conjunction with the agar plate method [17]. Soil samples weighing 5 g were ground and mixed with 9 ml of autoclaved distilled water, shaken thoroughly, and then kept at 70°C for 1 h. A 1 ml mixture of this solution was diluted with sterile distilled water at a ratio of 1:10. In addition, each soil sample was serially diluted 10-3 to 10-8. Then, 0.1 ml of each dilution was spread on two LB agar plates, one of which was incubated at 30°C and the other at 37°C, for 7 days. Every single colony was picked and sub-cultured on LB agar medium for purification and further studies of colony morphology. Pure bacterial culture suspensions were then grown in LB medium and optical density of cultures at 600 nm (OD600) up to 1.5, and stored as 20% glycerol stock at -80°C.

16S rRNA Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis of Bacillus spp.

Genomic DNA of the bacteria isolated from the root micro-ecosystem of S. glauca Bunge was extracted using the bacterial genomic DNA FastPrep Extraction Kit (Sangon Biotech, China). DNA was quantified on a Nanodrop ND100 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and stored at -20°C.

The 16S rRNA genes from rhizobacterial isolates were amplified using the bacterial universal primers 27F (5′-AGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′- GGTTAC CTTGTTACGACTT-3′). PCR was performed in a T1 cycler (Biometra, Germany) in 50-μl reaction systems containing 0.5 μM of each primer, 25 μl 2×Taq Master Mix (Dye Plus) (Vazyme, China), 1 μl of genomic DNA and sterile distilled water (up to 50 μl). Thermal cycling was carried out with a denaturation step at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of 45 s denaturation at 94°C, 45 s annealing at 56°C and 90 s elongation at 72°C, with a final elongation step at 72°C for 5 min, then cooled to 4°C. The PCR products were further sequenced and verified by Sangon Biotech (China) after purifying with a QIAquick-PCR purification column (Qiagen, Germany). A sequence similarity search was conducted using GenBank BLAST. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA7 software with bootstrap analysis using 1,000 replications to assess the relative stability of the branches. All 16S rRNA gene sequences from the isolates were submitted to the NCBI GenBank Database under an accession number.

Cloning and Partial Sequence Analysis of the gyrA, gyrB and rpoB Housekeeping Genes

The partial sequences of the three housekeeping genes gyrA, gyrB, and rpoB were amplified using the specific primers gyrA F (5′-CAGTCAGGAAATGCGTACGTCC TT-3′): gyrA R (5′-CAAGGTAATGCTCCAGGCATTGCT-3′), gyrB F (5′-TTATCTACGACCTTAGA CG-3′): gyrB R (5′-TAAATTGAAGTCTTCTCCG-3′) [18], and rpoB F (AGGTCAACTAGT TCAGTATGGAC): rpoB R (5′-AAGAACCA TAACCGGCAACTT-3′), respectively [19]. The 50 μl PCR reaction system contained 5 μl of the 10× PCR buffer, 2 μl dNTPs, 1 μl Pfu DNA polymerase (Takara Bio Inc., China), 3 μl genomic DNA template (25 ng/μl DNA), 2 μl of each of the primers (0.1 μM) and 35 μl of the deionized distilled water (DDW). The temperature program included a denaturation step at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 1min, annealing at 50~63°C for 30 s, and elongation at 72°C for 1 min, followed by a final elongation cycle at 72°C for 5 min, after which the PCR product was kept at 4°C. For Sanger sequencing, 20 μl of the PCR product purified using the DNA gel extraction kit (Qiagen) was sent to Sangon Biotech (China). Results of sequencing were analyzed using Chromas V 1.45, DNAMAN 8.0, MEGA7 and Blast software at the NCBI site. The partial sequences of the tree housekeeping genes from the isolates were submitted to the NCBI GenBank Database under an accession number (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of the antifungal Bacillus strains B1, B5, B16, and B21 generated using the neighbor-joining method based on the 16S rDNA gene sequences (A), and the rpoB (B), gyrA (C), and gyrB gene sequences (D).

Screening for Antifungal Bacteria and Testing of Antifungal Activity

Twelve plant-pathogenic fungi (including Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium graminearum Sehw, Rhizoctonia cerealis van der Hoeven, Gaeumannomyces graminis (sacc.), Botrytis cinereal Pers., Botryosphaeria dothidea, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum, Colletotrichum capsici (syd.) Butl., Fusarium verticillioides, F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum (Atk) and F. oxysporum f. sp. lilii (for more details see Table S1), all of which were originated from plants including agricultural crops, fruits and vegetables, were provided by the Institute of Plant and Environment Protection (IPEP) of Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (BAAFS) and exposed to the isolated bacteria to assess their antifungal spectrum. To measure the antifungal activity of the bacteria, a mycelial disk (5 mm in diameter) of each plant-pathogenic fungus from a 5-day-old culture was placed at the edge of a PDA medium plate, 25 mm away from each streaked bacterial inoculum (106 CFU/ml), which was placed in the middle of the plate. Then, the plate was incubated at 25°C for 5-8 days. Inhibition of mycelial growth of each fungus was then measured, and the inhibitory effect of the antagonistic bacteria was assessed by the radial growth inhibition percentage.

Tolerance of Isolates to Salinity and Alkalinity

The antagonistic bacteria screened in the antifungal activity test were then further characterized for their ability to tolerate salinity and alkalinity. The NaCl concentration in the LB broth was varied from 0.1% to 15%, and the pH value was adjusted from 3 to 10 with 1 mol/l sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or 1 mol/l hydrochloric acid (HCl) for the alkalinity test. The seed cultures of the antagonistic strains were used to inoculate 250-ml flasks containing 30 ml of LB medium and grown at 30°C and 150 × g for 20 h. Cell proliferation was monitored by measuring the OD600.

Ability of the Isolates to Promote the Growth of Arabidopsis thaliana

Seeds of A. thaliana ecotype Columbia (Col-0) were surface-sterilized by soaking in 75% ethanol for 2 min, followed by soaking in 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) for 20 min. The seeds were thoroughly washed three times with sterile distilled water and then germinated in Petri dishes with half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 0.8% agar and 1.5% sucrose, and the pH was adjusted to 5.7 [16]. The seeds were then vernalized for 2 days at 4°C in darkness. The resulting seedlings were placed in growth cabinets and subjected to a 12-h light/dark cycle under 40W fluorescent lights at a constant temperature of 22°C and relative humidity of 50-60%. Germinated seedlings were transferred to plates after 2 days to test the ability of the bacterial strains to promote the growth of A. thaliana [16].

The bacterial strains were cultured overnight at 30°C in LB medium, and then diluted with sterile distilled water to yield 109 CFU/ml based on the OD600 and the number of colonies counted on plates for the various serial dilutions. Plastic Petri dishes (100 × 15 mm) with a central partition were filled with Murashige and Skoog solid medium, and 2-day-old germinated A. thaliana seedlings (9 seedlings per plate) were transferred to one side of each plate. The plants were inoculated with 10 μl bacterial strain solution (109 CFU/ml) or sterile distilled water (as control) at the center of the other side of the plate that did not contain the seedling. After 2 weeks of incubation, the total number of leaves and the leaf and fresh stem weights were measured to evaluate the growth-promoting effect of the bacteria [16]. The assay was repeated three times each with nine biological replicates (n =3×9=27) for each treatment.

Statistical Analysis

The significance of differences was assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) in SPSS20.0 software (IBM Corp., USA). The antibacterial effect of four Bacillus sp. strains on 12 fungal pathogens was determined by the following formula: IR = (R1−R2)/R1 × 100%, where R1 is the radial growth of the plant-pathogenic fungus on the control plate, and R2 is the radial growth of the plant pathogenic fungus interacting with the antagonistic strain. The effect of the treatment with growth promotion of A. thaliana was determined based on the magnitude of the F value (p = 0.05). When the ANOVA was significant (p ≤ 0.05), means were separated with Duncan’s test.

Results

Isolation and Screening of Bacillus spp. from the Root Micro-Ecosystem of S. glauca Bunge

Eight soil collection sites encompassing diverse habitats such as offshore, riverway, tributary, swale, etc., were selected at Red Beach, and ten soil samples from the rhizosphere of S. glauca Bunge (labeled as Sg-01 through Sg-10) were collected and refrigerated at 4°C. A total of 103 strains were isolated as described in Materials and Methods. The isolates were further identified based on their morphological characteristics such as size, color, colony edge shape, and viscosity, and also according to the results of Gram staining and microscopic observation. Based on obviously different morphological characteristics, 21 isolates were suspected to be different strains (see Table S2 in the supplemental material) and chosen for further identification by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

The analysis of 16S rRNA sequences indicated that the 21 isolates, which were collected from the root micro-ecosystem of S. glauca Bunge, could be categorized into five clusters (Fig. 1). However, the isolates belonged to only two genera, Brevibacterium and Bacillus. Among the isolates, only a single strain of Brevibacterium was obtained, and was identified as Brevibacterium frigoritolerans, while among the Bacillus species, eight strains were identified as Bacillus velezensis, one was Bacillus subtilis, five were Bacillus pumilus, and six were determined as Bacillus aryabhattai.

Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree based on the 16S rDNA sequences of Bacillus spp. strains isolated from the rhizosphere of S. glauca constructed using the neighbor-joining method.

Screening and Analysis of the Antifungal Activity of the Isolated Bacillus Strains

The 21 isolated bacterial strains were tested for their ability to inhibit or prevent mycelial growth of fungal plant pathogens, and four Bacillus sp. strains labeled as B1, B5, B16 and B21 showed apparent antifungal activity, especially against C. capsici (syd.) Butl., F. verticillioides, R. cerealis van, G. graminis (sacc.), B. cinerea Pers. and B. dothidea (Fig. 2 and Table 1).

Table 1 . Inhibition rates of the four Bacillus sp. strains against 12 fungal pathogens..

The tested strainsInhibition rate (%)

B1B5B16B21
F. oxysporum39.5225.5424.7313.71
F. graminearum Sehw61.5159.8362.5439.23
R. cerealis van47.4460.3548.6873.52
G. graminis (sacc.)26.3537.0423.088.55
B. cinereal Pers.56.1343.1452.5143.79
B. dothidea58.8661.4070.2271.66
C. gloeosporioides Penz37.6125.8620.9810.34
F. oxysporum f. Sp.niveum45.7566.1767.4168.15
C. capsici (syd.) Butl.60.4672.9574.5669.74
F. verticillioides27.0224.4815.955.31
F. oxysporum f. sp. lilii67.4165.0867.2066.67
F. oxysporum f. sp. vesinfectum (Atk)67.6942.3151.2848.08


Figure 2. Antifungal effects of the isolated Bacillus spp. strains against different plant-pathogenic fungi (A: B1 against F. oxysporum; B: B1 against B. cinerea Pers.; C: B1 against G. graminis (sacc.); D: B5 against R. cerealis van; E: B5 against C. capsici (syd.) Butl.; F: B16 against F. oxysporum f. sp. lili; G: B16 against F. oxysporum; H: B21 against B. dothidea; I: B21 against B. cinereal Pers; J: F. graminearum Sehw against F. graminearum Sehw as one of the controls).

Table 1 lists the results of the antagonistic activity test for each isolate. The inhibition rates of the four Bacillus sp. strains were monitored by measuring the width of the inhibition zone (see Table S3 in the supplemental material). Strain B1 was more effective against F. oxysporum f. sp. vesinfectum (Atk.) and F. oxysporum, with 67.69% and 67.41% antimicrobial rate, respectively. Strain B5 was the most effective strain against C. capsica (syd.) Butl., with 72.95% antimicrobial rate, followed by 66.17% and 65.08% antimicrobial rate against F. verticillioides and F. oxysporum f. sp. lilii. Strain B16 was the most effective bacterium against C. capsica (syd.) Butl. (74.56%), followed by 70.22% and 67.41% antimicrobial rate against B. dothidea and F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum, whereas strain B21 was the most effective against R. cerealis van up to 73.52%, and close to B. dothidea up to 71.66%. These results demonstrated that all four Bacillus strains exhibited broad-spectrum antifungal activity.

Analysis of gyrA, gyrB, and rpoB Housekeeping Genes, and 16S rRNA Gene from B1, B5, B16, and B21

Based on the inhibition of the mycelial growth of fungal plant pathogens, B1, B5, B16, and B21 appeared to have distinct antifungal activity. However, the 16S rRNA analysis showed that B1, B5, and B21 were strains of B. velezensis, with sequence identities from 99 to 100%. The 16S rRNA gene sequence sometimes has a limited ability to reliably distinguish taxa at the species level due to the conserved nature of the gene [19]. In order to further phylogenetically analyze B1, B5, B16, and B21, the housekeeping genes gyrA, gyrB, and rpoB, which respectively code for major subunits of the DNA Gyrase and RNA polymerase, were also employed for identification [18, 19]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the 16S rRNA gene sequences (Fig. 3A), the rpoB gene sequence for B1, B5, B16, and B21 (Fig. 3B), the gyrA gene sequence (Fig. 3C), and the gyrB gene sequence (Fig. 3D). The analysis of the 16S rRNA genes of B1, B5, B16, and B21 analysis showed that B1, B5, and B21 clustered with B. velezensis, B. amyloliquefaciens or B. siamensis while B16 clustered with B. aryabhattai or B. megaterium (Fig. 3A). The sequence analysis of the housekeeping gene rpoB, which encodes one of the subunits of RNA polymerase, differentiated the isolates B1, B5, B21, and B16. The analysis of rpoB revealed that B1, B5, and B21 showed high similarity (Fig. 3B), while B16 was more distant. Based on gyrA gene sequence analysis, B1, B5, B21 were identified as B. velezensis, and B16 was identified as B. amyloliquefaciens (Fig. 3C). Based on gyrB gene sequence analysis, B1, B5, B21 were identified as B. amyloliquefaciens and B16 was identified as B. velezensis (Fig. 3D). The nucleotide and amino acid changes in gyrA, gyrB, and rpoB of B1, B5, B16, and B21 compared with the reference strain B. velezensis strain CBMB205 (NZ_CP011937.1), and the frequency of nucleotide and amino acid substitutions among the different groups are listed in Table 2. The gyrA sequence of B16 was identical to that of B. velezensis, while G (457) and T (573) of gyrA in the other strains were changed into T and C, respectively, whereas Ala (153) and Val (158) were changed into Ser and Ala accordingly. T (324) of rpoB in the four strains was changed into C and G (276) of B1, B5, and B21 were changed into A, but all of their amino acid sequences showed no differences. A (548) of gyrB in B1, B5, and B21 was changed into T, C (494) in B1, T (533) in B5, G (460) in B21, and G (884) in B16 were changed into T, G, A, and A, respectively. Accordingly, Glu (183) in B1, B5, and B21 was changed into Val, while Thr (163) in B1, Phe (178) in B5, Ala (154) in B21 and Arg (195) in B16 were respectively changed into Ile, Cys, Thr, and His. The comparison results of the three housekeeping genes gyrA, gyrB, and rpoB showed that B1, B5, and B21 could belong to different strains of the same species called B. amyloliquefaciens.

Table 2 . Classification of BI, B5, B16, and B21 based on distribution of gyrA, gyrB, and rpoB genes nucleotide and amino acid changes..

Gene (5’partial)Nucleotide changeAmino acid change

B1B5B21B16B1B5B21B16
16S rDNA--------
gyrAG(457)→TG(457)→TG(457)→T-Ala(153)→SerAla(153)→SerAla(153)→Ser-
T(573)→CT(573)→CT(573)→C-Val(158)→AlaVal(158) →AlaVal(158)→Ala-
gyrBC(494)→TT(533)→GG(460)→AG(884)→AThr(163)→IlePhe(178)→CysAla(154)→ThrArg(195)→His
A(548)→TA(548)→TA(548)→T-Glu(183)→ValGlu(183)→ValGlu(183)→Val-
rpoBG(276)→AG(276)→AG(276)→AT(324)→C----
T(324)→CT(324)→CT(324)→C-----

The gyrA, gyrB, and rpoB from B. velezensis CBMB205 (NZ_CP011937.1) as reference, when phylogenetically analyzing B1, B5, B16, and B21 by three housekeeping genes cloned from B1, B5, B16, and B21. The 16S rDNA gene from B. velezensis CBMB205 and B. aryabhattai B8W22 as reference, when phylogenetically analyzing B1, B5 and B21, and B16 by 16s rDNA genes cloned from B1, B5, B21, and B16, respectively. “-” means no change..



Salinity and Alkalinity Resistance of the Antifungal Bacillus Strains

The effects of salinity and alkalinity on the proliferation of the strains B1, B5, B16, and B21, which exhibited broad-spectrum antifungal activities, were also assessed (Fig. 4). Salt tolerance differed substantially among the strains. The salt concentration that could be tolerated by the strains ranged from 0.1% to 10% (Fig. 4A). All strains grew well at 1% salt concentration (10 g/l NaCl; i.e., normal LB medium), with a growth potential of up to 10%. The OD600 of B5 reached its maximum of 0.9 when the concentration of NaCl was 5%. However, only B16 could grow in medium with 10% NaCl. The relative salt tolerance of the strains within the NaCl range 1-10% was in the order B5 > B16 > B21 > B1. All strains stopped growing when exposed to salt concentrations above 12%.

Figure 4. Resistance to salinity and alkalinity of the four antifungal Bacillus strains.

An acid-alkali tolerance test was carried out in LB media with different pH values (3 to 10). The four Bacillus strains all grew normally in the pH range of 5-8 (Fig. 4B), but their optimal pH values were quite different as the strains B1 and B16 grew best at pH 5-7, while B5 and B21 showed the best growth at pH 6-8. None of the strains grew well at pH ≤ 4 or > 8.

Ability of the Four Bacillus sp. Strains to Promote the Growth of A. thaliana

To assess the growth-promoting effect of the four antimicrobial strains, A. thaliana was cultivated with B1, B2, B16, B21 and sterile water (as control) in solid medium on the same plate (Fig. 5) (n = 27). Compared with the control group, each strain could promote the growth of A. thaliana, albeit to different extents. The growth-promoting effect was assessed based on the increase of the number of leaves and the fresh weight of the combined stems and leaves (Table 3). Strains B1, B5, and B21 significantly promoted the growth of leaves, while strains B1, B16, and B21 were relatively more effective in promoting the increase of leaf-stem fresh weight.

Table 3 . Abilities of four Bacillus sp. strains to promote growth of A. thaliana (n = 27)..

TreatmentNumber of leavesLeaf and stem fresh weight (mg)
CK8.88 ± 0.99c25.39 ± 8.28c
B110.38 ± 0.74ab30.79 ± 6.50bc
B511.25 ± 1.04a38.38 ± 8.62ab
B169.75 ± 0.71bc40.89 ± 3.72a
B2111.00 ± 1.07a34.51 ± 7.99ab

a, b, and c results refer to average of triplicates ± SD. The mean difference is significant (p < 0.05). Same letter in column was used as a notation for statistical analysis; CK (control): A. thaliana were cultivated at sterile water..



Figure 5. Plant growth promotion analysis of the four Bacillus sp. strains on A. thaliana compared with water treatment (control).

Discussion

Plant roots growing in special environments such as wetlands or highly alkaline soil can produce a broad variety of metabolites to adapt to the environment and attract or select special microorganisms in the rhizosphere [20]. A variety of microorganisms form a complex micro-ecosystem and establish a dynamic balance with plants [21]. However, there are few studies on the diversity and distribution of micro-ecosystem and endophytic bacteria associated with plants and their potential functions [21, 22]. Previously, we analyzed the microbial colony structure of the S. glauca Bunge root micro-ecosystem by high-throughput sequencing [23]. The analysis yielded a total of 143,041 effective sequences, 1,346 OTUs, 27 phyla, 60 classes, 104 orders, 193 families, 355 genera, and 408 species [23]. The abundance of microbial species inhabiting the roots of S. glauca may provide clues for understanding the salt and alkali tolerance traits of S. glauca [24]. Thus, the results in this investigation may provide further detailed information for the composition and diversity of the rhizosphere bacterial microbiome of the halophyte S. glauca Bunge. In order to expand our understanding of the diversity of culturable salt-tolerant rhizospheric bacteria from the roots of halophyte S. glauca Bunge, we isolated and identified different species of rhizospheric bacteria from 10 sampling sites. However, it is worth mentioning that 103 strains were isolated from the root micro-ecosystem of S. glauca Bunge. According to the obviously different morphological characteristics, 21 isolates were suspected to be different strains. Based on the analysis of 16S rRNA sequences, the isolates belonged to only two genera, Brevibacterium and Bacillus. B. velezensis, B. subtilis, B. pumilus, B. aryabhattai and B. frigoritolerans were found among the identified isolates. It was shown that the Bacillus spp. is the dominant phyla in S. glauca. Similar phyla were presented by Yamamoto et al. [25] who studied the diversity of endophytic and rhizospheric bacteria of the halophytes S. europaea and Glaux maritima. What’s more, Bouizgarne [26] reported that Bacillus spp. could mainly colonize in the rhizosphere of plants. Generally, Bacillus spp. may play significant roles in the life of S. glauca and other halophytes [27-29], as bacteria could produce certain antifungal and antibacterial metabolites [30-32] including the notable proteins iturin and chitinase [5].

Rhizosphere bacteria are well known inhabitants of living plant systems and play an important role in maintaining plant growth and health. In this examination, four Bacillus sp. strains labeled as B1, B5, B16, and B21 showed apparent antifungal activity, which may indicate their high antifungal ability under saline conditions. In another investigation, fresh fruits such as strawberry and golden delicious were infected with B. cinerea Pers., and fought against with Bacillus sp. (B16) at room temperature for more than 12 days. The results showed that Bacillus sp. (B16) also has good resistance to plant pathogenic bacteria on real fruits (data not shown). Based on the data obtained from the literature, Bacillus species obtained from soil or aerial parts of plants have been proven to be superb producers of antibacterial compounds and have the potential to control fungi and phytopathogenic bacteria [33, 34]. Kupper et al. [35] found that most Bacillus isolates produce volatile metabolic compounds that inhibit the development of pathogens and the production of two antibiotics (iturin and surfactant) can be detected in B. subtilis ACB-83. Similar results were found by Asari et al. [36] who used B. amyloliquefaciens strains to control pathogens and showed that the isolates can effectively produce volatile organic compounds with antibacterial effects in vitro. And Leelasuphakul et al. [37] found that volatile organic compounds (alcohols) produced by Bacillus can inhibit the growth of fungi. Furthermore, based on the genome sequence analysis of B. velezensis C4341 isolated from saline soil samples, Zhu et al. [38] presented that genes related to biofilm formation, iron acquisition, colonization, and synthesis of volatile organic compounds were found in the genome of B. velezensis. These genes play an important role in the process of biological control. Notably, it seems that four Bacillus sp. strains not only have high antifungal ability but also other abilities such as promoting the growth of plants. To assess the growth-promoting effect of the four antimicrobial strains, A. thaliana was cultivated with B1, B5, B16, B21 and sterile water (as control) in solid medium on the same plate. All of the A. thaliana showed a significant enhancement in plant growth compared with control seedlings (Fig. 5). Recently, several Bacillus spp. including B1, B5, B16, and B21, were also investigated for their ability to promote the growth of Nicotiana benthamiana (data not shown). The results indicated that the growth characteristics of N. benthamiana were similar to those of A. thaliana Columbia (Col-0). These findings were also to a report by Kushwaha, who found various species of endophytic Bacillus in pearl millet with excellent growth promotion and biocontrol activities [39]. Therefore, it has been indicated that B1, B5, B16, and B21 have potential applications in agriculture and biotechnology. Moreover, many Bacillus isolates can fix nitrogen and also be used for biocontrol of the sugarcane pathogens Ceratocystis paradoxa and Sporisorium scitamineum [40]. Nitrogen-fixing species can be used as a fertilizer, in addition to their biocontrol effects [40, 41]. Hence, diverse species of the genus Bacillus are valuable bioresources for agro-biotechnological applications due to their plant growth-promoting and biological control effects [6], which was consistent with our findings.

Salinity and alkalinity can greatly reduce the growth and productivity of sensitive plants. The effects of salinity and alkalinity on the proliferation of the strains B1, B5, B16, and B21, were also assessed in this examination. However, these strains showed considerable variation in salt and alkaline tolerance. The relative salt tolerance of the strains within the NaCl range 1-10% was in the order B5 > B16 > B21 > B1. Besides, the four Bacillus strains all grew normally in the pH range of 5-8, but their optimal pH values were quite different as the strains B1 and B16 grew best at pH 5-7 while B5 and B21 showed the best growth at pH 6-8. This may indicate the high diversity of Bacillus spp. in saline environments as well as their adaptation to the plant. However, soil salinity can affect rhizosphere bacterial diversity in normal circumstances and Szymańska reported that the number of endophytic bacteria and rhizosphere bacteria in halophyte S. europaea is small under extreme salinity conditions [42]. This may give us some hints about the high salt tolerance of Bacillus spp. Although only B16 could grow in medium with 10% NaCl, all strains grew well at 1% salt concentration, and the growth potential could reach 10%. In short, the present results indicated that the diversity and function of Bacillus spp. might play an important role in the root micro-ecosystem in S. glauca.

Supplemental Materials

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31970038), the Science Public Welfare Fund Projects of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. 2017C32050), and the Key Research and Development Projects of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. 2020C02030).

Conflicts of Interest


The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Phylogenetic tree based on the 16S rDNA sequences of Bacillus spp. strains isolated from the rhizosphere of S. glauca constructed using the neighbor-joining method.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2021; 31: 1231-1240https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2105.05010

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Antifungal effects of the isolated Bacillus spp. strains against different plant-pathogenic fungi (A: B1 against F. oxysporum; B: B1 against B. cinerea Pers.; C: B1 against G. graminis (sacc.); D: B5 against R. cerealis van; E: B5 against C. capsici (syd.) Butl.; F: B16 against F. oxysporum f. sp. lili; G: B16 against F. oxysporum; H: B21 against B. dothidea; I: B21 against B. cinereal Pers; J: F. graminearum Sehw against F. graminearum Sehw as one of the controls).
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2021; 31: 1231-1240https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2105.05010

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Phylogenetic tree of the antifungal Bacillus strains B1, B5, B16, and B21 generated using the neighbor-joining method based on the 16S rDNA gene sequences (A), and the rpoB (B), gyrA (C), and gyrB gene sequences (D).
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2021; 31: 1231-1240https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2105.05010

Fig 4.

Figure 4.Resistance to salinity and alkalinity of the four antifungal Bacillus strains.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2021; 31: 1231-1240https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2105.05010

Fig 5.

Figure 5.Plant growth promotion analysis of the four Bacillus sp. strains on A. thaliana compared with water treatment (control).
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2021; 31: 1231-1240https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2105.05010

Table 1 . Inhibition rates of the four Bacillus sp. strains against 12 fungal pathogens..

The tested strainsInhibition rate (%)

B1B5B16B21
F. oxysporum39.5225.5424.7313.71
F. graminearum Sehw61.5159.8362.5439.23
R. cerealis van47.4460.3548.6873.52
G. graminis (sacc.)26.3537.0423.088.55
B. cinereal Pers.56.1343.1452.5143.79
B. dothidea58.8661.4070.2271.66
C. gloeosporioides Penz37.6125.8620.9810.34
F. oxysporum f. Sp.niveum45.7566.1767.4168.15
C. capsici (syd.) Butl.60.4672.9574.5669.74
F. verticillioides27.0224.4815.955.31
F. oxysporum f. sp. lilii67.4165.0867.2066.67
F. oxysporum f. sp. vesinfectum (Atk)67.6942.3151.2848.08

Table 2 . Classification of BI, B5, B16, and B21 based on distribution of gyrA, gyrB, and rpoB genes nucleotide and amino acid changes..

Gene (5’partial)Nucleotide changeAmino acid change

B1B5B21B16B1B5B21B16
16S rDNA--------
gyrAG(457)→TG(457)→TG(457)→T-Ala(153)→SerAla(153)→SerAla(153)→Ser-
T(573)→CT(573)→CT(573)→C-Val(158)→AlaVal(158) →AlaVal(158)→Ala-
gyrBC(494)→TT(533)→GG(460)→AG(884)→AThr(163)→IlePhe(178)→CysAla(154)→ThrArg(195)→His
A(548)→TA(548)→TA(548)→T-Glu(183)→ValGlu(183)→ValGlu(183)→Val-
rpoBG(276)→AG(276)→AG(276)→AT(324)→C----
T(324)→CT(324)→CT(324)→C-----

The gyrA, gyrB, and rpoB from B. velezensis CBMB205 (NZ_CP011937.1) as reference, when phylogenetically analyzing B1, B5, B16, and B21 by three housekeeping genes cloned from B1, B5, B16, and B21. The 16S rDNA gene from B. velezensis CBMB205 and B. aryabhattai B8W22 as reference, when phylogenetically analyzing B1, B5 and B21, and B16 by 16s rDNA genes cloned from B1, B5, B21, and B16, respectively. “-” means no change..


Table 3 . Abilities of four Bacillus sp. strains to promote growth of A. thaliana (n = 27)..

TreatmentNumber of leavesLeaf and stem fresh weight (mg)
CK8.88 ± 0.99c25.39 ± 8.28c
B110.38 ± 0.74ab30.79 ± 6.50bc
B511.25 ± 1.04a38.38 ± 8.62ab
B169.75 ± 0.71bc40.89 ± 3.72a
B2111.00 ± 1.07a34.51 ± 7.99ab

a, b, and c results refer to average of triplicates ± SD. The mean difference is significant (p < 0.05). Same letter in column was used as a notation for statistical analysis; CK (control): A. thaliana were cultivated at sterile water..


References

  1. Cai D, Rao Y, Zhan Y, Wang Q, Chen S. 2019. Engineering bacillus for efficient production of heterologous protein: current progress, challenge and prospect. J. Appl. Microbiol. 126: 1632-1642.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Nicholson WL. 2002. Roles of Bacillus endospores in the environment. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 59: 410-416.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Abriouel H, Franz CMAP, Ben ON, Gálvez A. 2011. Diversity and applications of Bacillus bacteriocins. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 35: 201-232.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Jeżewska-Frąckowiak J, Seroczyńska K, Banaszczyk J, Jedrzejczak G, Żylicz-Stachula A, Skowron PM. 2018. The promises and risks of probiotic Bacillus species. Acta Biochim. Pol. 65: 509-519.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Lopes R, Tsui S, Goncalves PJRO, de Queiroz MV. 2018. A look into a multifunctional toolbox: endophytic Bacillus species provide broad and underexploited benefits for plants. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 34: 94.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Saxena AK, Kumar M, Chakdar H, Anuroopa N, Bagyaraj DJ. 2020. Bacillus species in soil as a natural resource for plant health and nutrition. J. Appl. Microbiol. 128: 1583-1594.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Radhakrishnan R, Hashem A, Abd Allah EF. 2017. Bacillus: a biological tool for crop improvement through bio-molecular changes in adverse environments. Front. Physiol. 8: 667.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Miljakovi D, Marinkovi J, Baleevi-Tubi S. 2020. The significance of Bacillus spp. in disease suppression and growth promotion of field and vegetable crops. Microorganisms 8: 1037.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Berendsen RL, Pieterse CMJ, Bakker PAHM. 2012. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 17: 478-486.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Jin H, Dong D, Yang Q. 2016. Salt-responsive transcriptome profiling of Suaeda glauca via RNA sequencing. PLoS One 11: e0150504.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Cui LJ, Pan X, Li W, Zhang XD, Liu GF, Song YB, et al. 2019. Phragmites australis meets Suaeda salsa on the "red beach": effects of an ecosystem engineer on salt-marsh litter decomposition. Sci. Total Environ. 693: 133477.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Duan HM, Ma YH, Liu RR, Li Q, Yang Y, Song J. 2018. Effect of combined waterlogging and salinity stresses on euhalophyte Suaeda glauca. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 127: 231-237.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Zhang HG, Yang BR, Chen AH, Liang HX. 2017. Soil microbial diversity of marshes covered by Suaeda salsa and Spartina alternifora in Yancheng Wetland. Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol. 16: 1113-1119.
  14. Xu ZK, Shao TY, Lv ZX, Yue Y, Liu AH, Long XH, et al. 2020. The mechanisms of improving coastal saline soils by planting rice. Sci. Total Environ. 703: 135529.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Rath M, Mitchell TR, Gold SE. 2018. Volatiles produced by Bacillus mojavensis RRC101 act as plant growth modulators and are strongly culture-dependent. Microbiol. Res. 208: 76-84.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Nishijima T, Toyota K, Mochizuki M. 2005. Predominant culturable Bacillus species in Japanese arable soils and their potential as biocontrol agents. Microbes Environ. 20: 61-68.
    CrossRef
  17. Sha YX, Zeng QC, Sui ST. 2020. Screening and application of Bacillus strains isolated from nonrhizospheric rice soil for the biocontrol of rice blast. Plant Pathol. 36: 231-243.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Ki JS, Zhang W, Qian PY. 2009. Discovery of marine Bacillus species by 16S rRNA and rpoB comparisons and their usefulness for species identification. J. Microbiol. Methods 77: 48-57.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Jing CL, Xu ZC, Zou P, Tang Q, Li YQ, You XW, et al. 2019. Coastal halophytes alter properties and microbial community structure of the saline soils in the Yellow River Delta, China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 134: 1-7.
    CrossRef
  20. Khan AG. 2005. Role of soil microbes in the rhizospheres of plants growing on trace metal contaminated soils in phytoremediation. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 18: 355-364.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Fayez R, Salek-Gilani S. 2018. The potential activity of soil extracellular enzymes as an indicator for ecological restoration of rangeland soil after agricultural abandonment. Appl. Soil Ecol. 126: 140-147.
    CrossRef
  22. Shen Q, Hao YQ, Xu XH, Xu YD, Yang JY, Chu WY, et al. 2020. Analysis of rhizosphere bacterial diversity in Suaeda glauca Bunge based on high-throughput sequencing. J. Zhejiang Sci-Tech University 43: 671-677.
  23. López-Angulo J, de la Cruz M, Chacón-Labella J, Illuminati A, Matesanz S, Pescador DS, et al. 2020. The role of root community attributes in predicting soil fungal and bacterial community patterns. New Phytol. 228: 1070-1082.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Yamamoto K, Shiwa Y, Ishige T, Sakamoto H, Tanaka K, Uchino M, et al. 2018. Bacterial diversity associated with the rhizosphere and endosphere of two halophytes: Glaux maritima and Salicornia europaea. Front. Microbiol. 9: 2878.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  25. Bouizgarne B. 2013. Bacteria for plant growth promotion and disease management, pp. 15-47. In: Maheshwari D (ed), Bacteria in Agrobiology: Disease Management, 2nd Ed. Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht, London.
    CrossRef
  26. Mukhtar S, Ishaq A, Hassan S, Mehnaz S, Mirza MS, Malik KA. 2017. Comparison of microbial communities associated with halophyte (Salsola stocksii) and non-halophyte (Triticum aestivum) using culture-independent approaches. Pol. J. Microbiol. 66: 353-364.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Shi YW, Lou K, Li C, Wang L, Zhao ZY, Zhao S, et al. 2015. Illumina based analysis of bacterial diversity related to halophytes Salicornia europaea and Sueada aralocaspica. J. Microbiol. 53: 678-685.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Tian XY, Zhang CS. 2017. Illumina-based analysis of endophytic and rhizosphere bacterial diversity of the coastal halophyte Messerschmidia sibirica. Front. Microbiol. 8: 2288.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  29. Brack C, Mikolasch A, Schlueter R, Otto A, Becher D, Wegner U, et al. 2015. Antibacterial metabolites and bacteriolytic enzymes produced by Bacillus pumilus during bacteriolysis of Arthrobacter citreus. Mar. Biotechnol. 17: 290-304.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  30. Schinke C, Martins T, Queiroz SCN, Melo IS, Reyes FGR. 2017. Antibacterial compounds from marine bacteria, 2010-2015. J. Nat. Prod. 80: 1215-1228.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Fira D, Dimkic I, Beric T, Lozo J, Stankovic S. 2018. Biological control of plant pathogens by Bacillus species. J. Biotechnol. 285: 44-55.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Bais HP, Fall R, Vivanco JM. 2004. Biocontrol of Bacillus subtilis against infection of Arabidopsis roots by Pseudomonas syringae is facilitated by bioflm formation and surfactin production. Plant Physiol. 134: 307-319.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Kupper KC, Corrêa FE, Azevedo FA, Silva AC. 2012. Bacillus subtilis to biological control of postbloom fruit drop caused by Colletotrichum acutatum under feld conditions. Sci. Hortic. 134: 139-143.
    CrossRef
  34. Kupper KC, Moretto RK, Fujimoto A. 2020. Production of antifungal compounds by Bacillus spp. isolates and its capacity for controlling citrus black spot under field conditions. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 36: 1.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Asari S, S Matzén, Petersen MA, Bejai S, Meijer J, Sessitsch A. 2016. Multiple effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens volatile compounds: plant growth promotion and growth inhibition of phytopathogens. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 92: iw070.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Leelasuphakul W, Hemmanee P, Chuenchitt S. 2008. Growth inhibitory properties of Bacillus subtilis strains and their metabolites against the green mold pathogen (penicillium digitatum sacc.) of citrus fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 48: 113-121.
    CrossRef
  37. Zhu L, Liu N, Wang H, Zhang Z, Jiang L, Huang H. 2019. Draft genome sequence of broad-spectrum antifungal-producing Bacillus velezensis C4341 isolated from a saline-alkali soil sample in China. J. Glob. Antbimicrob. Resist. 16: 291-293.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Kushwaha P, Kashyap PL, Srivastava AK, Tiwari RK. 2020. Plant growth promoting and antifungal activity in endophytic Bacillus strains from pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Braz. J. Microbiol. 51: 229-241.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  39. Singh RK, Singh P, Li HB, Song QQ, Guo DJ, Solanki MK, et al. 2020. Diversity of nitrogen-fixing rhizobacteria associated with sugarcane: a comprehensive study of plant-microbe interactions for growth enhancement in Saccharum spp. BMC Plant Biol. 20: 220.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  40. Hong Y, Ma Y, Wu L, Maki M, Qin W, Chen S. 2012. Characterization and analysis of nifH genes from Paenibacillus sabinae T27. Microbiol. Res. 167: 596-60.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Szymańska S, Płociniczak T, Piotrowska-Seget Z, Hrynkiewicz K. 2016. Endophytic and rhizosphere bacteria associated with the roots of the halophyte Salicornia europaea L.-community structure and metabolic potential. Microbiol. Res. 192: 37-51.
    Pubmed CrossRef