Articles Service
Review
Bacterial Exopolysaccharides: Insight into Their Role in Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance
Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Sector 125, Noida 201301, India
Correspondence to:J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021; 31(8): 1045-1059
Published August 28, 2021 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2105.05009
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Abstract
Keywords
Graphical Abstract

Introduction
Abiotic stresses like drought, salinity, heavy metals, and high or low temperature are major constraints to crop production by being detrimental to the physical, metabolic, and growth development of plants [1]. Plants are often subjected to multiple stresses which are aggravated by climatic changes, use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides and environmental pollution. This situation is more alarming with the increase in world population which is expected to reach around 10 billion by 2050 [2]. There is an urgent need to increase food production by 70% to meet the demand [2]. It is also imperative to find ways to implement new agricultural strategies to protect crops from these multiple abiotic stressors [3].
Currently, there are several approaches that enhance plant tolerance to abiotic stress. These include water-conserving irrigation strategies, traditional methods of breeding, and genetic engineering of transgenic plants with abiotic stress tolerance [4]. Plant growth-promoting rhizosphere microorganisms are also now being widely used for restoring soil fertility, remediation of chemical pollutants and to sustain plant growth [5]. They are a proven, effective alternative to conventional methods and a promising strategy for mitigating abiotic stresses. The use of plant growth-promoting microorganisms is a simple alternative approach to genetic engineering and breeding methods for crop improvement since these procedures are time-consuming, expensive, and laborious [6]. These microorganisms improve the root and shoot growth, thus enhancing the water and nutrient absorption from soil [7]. Different types of plant metabolites, such as HCN, 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (DAPG) [8], antibiotics,
Interestingly, the composition and concentration of the EPS that is produced varies in different strains, leading to various structural and functional types of EPS [22].The quantity and components of the EPS produced by bacteria depend on several factors such as type of bacteria, time of cultivation, state of growth, and availability of substrate [3, 23]. Therefore, the diversity of constituents present in the EPS imparts unique properties such as enhancement of water absorption and holding capacity of bacteria in the soil by means of aggregate formation [24]. Although EPS-producing bacteria are ubiquitously distributed in nature, there is a gap in knowledge with regard to the factors that are involved in the regulation, synthesis and variations in composition of EPS produced by plant growth-promoting bacteria in response to different abiotic stresses.
EPS-producing strains are more efficient in imparting resistance to abiotic stress compared to plant growth-promoting rhizosphere bacteria originated from the non-stress ecosystem [25]. Presence of these EPS strains influences plant growth and thus such bacteria are promising candidate biostimulants for stress management strategies for plant growth and development [25]. In the present review we discuss the role of exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria in combating abiotic stress in plants.
Bacterial EPSs
EPSs are extracellular polymers of bacterial origin. They are produced in response to environmental signals as an energy exchange mechanism [26]. ESPs are a complex mixture of diverse types of biomolecules forming a 3D structural matrixome containing polysaccharides, sugars, structural proteins, enzymes, amino sugars, nucleic acids, lipids, pyruvates, glycoproteins, lipids, extracellular DNA, and some humic substances [23]. Each of these components vary in physicochemical properties and functions. Acetate esters, pyruvates, formates, and succinates are the common extracellular carbohydrate substituents found in EPS [27]. The EPS backbone contains repeating units of monosaccharides, classified as homopolysaccharides and heteropolysaccharides [28]. Homopolymers are made up of single sugars such as pentoses (arabinose, and xylose), hexoses (glucose, galactose, mannose, allose), desoxyhexoses (rhamnose, fucose), amino sugars (glucosamine and galactosamine), or uronic acids (glucuronic acids and galacturonic acids) linked by strong 1,4-
These polysaccharides are responsible for cell adhesion, cell aggregation and water retention while forming a protective barrier and providing nutrient sources. In addition, proteins in the matrix provide binding enzymes (adhesins), electron acceptors and donors, and facilitate the absorption of organic and inorganic material. EPS amino acids serve as carbon and nitrogen sources for bacteria [30]. Nucleic acid also serves as source nutrients and genetic information. Humic substance supports adhesion and provides electron donor and acceptor [31]. In general, bacteria produce two types of EPS:capsular EPS (CPS), which is attached to the cell surface, and released polysaccharides (RPS-EPS), which are released by the bacterial cell into the surroundings. Extracellular enzymes of EPS facilitate nutrient absorption from aqueous medium and help in distribution as EPS changes from soluble to filamentous matrix form [32]. EPS helps in cohesion of bacteria, adhesion of biofilm to the root surface, and enables exchange of metabolic signaling information amongst bacteria to form a stable population with synergistic relationship [33]. There are 4 steps involved in the biosynthesis of EPS: 1) absorption, activation and conversion of monosaccharides into sugar nucleotides in the cytoplasm; 2) assembly of sugar nucleotide repeat units by the sequential addition of each unit on a lipid carrier molecule with the help of glycosyltransferase; 3) polymerization of these repeat units that occurs at the periplasmic side of the plasma membrane, and 4) exudation of EPS to the cell surface [32] (Fig. 1). The matrix of EPSs holds an assembly of microbial colonies to form biofilm. Formation of biofilms is regulated by multiple factors including metabolic signaling of quorum sensing [33]. Roots usually release secondary metabolite like phenolics, organic acids, amino acids and phytohormones, and siderophores in the form of root exudates. These exudates serve as chemoattractants for microbes associated with roots by electrostatic interaction and later develop the biofilm [34]. The quorum sensing (QS) system plays an important role in plant-microbe and microbe-microbe interactions in root harboring bacteria which promote plant growth during stress [35]. Strigolactones have been the signal molecules for plant microbe communication facilitating entry of bacteria into the roots of the plant. In bacteria two QS pathways (autoinducer-1 [AI-1] and autoinducer-2 [AI-2]) have been reported in bacteria (Miller, Waters) [35-37]. QS signal molecules, N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs), are commonly secreted in gram-negative bacteria, while autoinducer peptides are found in gram-positive bacteria. The AHLs serve as signaling molecules responsible for regulating the microbial population density in biofilm [36, 41]. The bacteria QS system helps bacteria acquire nutrition, ferric ions by siderophores, provides stress tolerance and produces antibiotics to inhibit pathogens [38]. QS signals also enhance root elongation, nodulation, and production of growth promoters like auxin and flavonoids to promote plant growth [38-40].
-
Fig. 1. Steps involved in biosynthesis of bacterial exopolysaccharides.
Microbial EPSs improve the quality and fertility of soil [41]. High-molecular-weight polymers in EPS help soil bacteria attach to the exterior of soil particles and sustain the collected particles. The EPSs adhere to soil surfaces through hydrogen binding, cation bonds, anion adsorption, and van der Waal’s forces [42]. By decreasing wetting and swelling, this organic outcome may facilitate the firmness of the soil aggregate aeration, permeation, root penetration, and decrease runoff [42]. EPS helps in microaggregation of soil by forming a organo-mineral sheath which improves the soil structure and provides stability to soil under stress conditions [41, 43] (Table 1).
-
Table 1 . EPS-producing bacterial strains in soil aggregation.
Microorganisms Roles of EPS References Microbacterium arborescens Cementing of soil particles [55] Bacillus sp.Soil aggregation [88] Pseudomonas mendocina Promote soil fertility and stabilization [51] Rhizobium sp.Soil aggregation
Increase in water holding capacity of soil in rhizosphere[48] Pseudomonas putida strain GAP-p45Soil aggregation increase root adherence stability Biofilm formation on surface of root of sunflower seedling [52]
Many plant growth-promoting rhizosphere bacteria maintain plant-water relations, ion homeostasis and photosynthetic efficiency in plants under drought and salt stress. Stress alleviation involves a complex signalling network operating as a result of plant–microbe interaction [35]. Thus, EPS as nutrient facilitator and adhesive matrix for attaching microbes to plants plays an important mediator in maintaining plant heath in abiotic stress. A positive correlation exists between abiotic stress and production of EPS by bacterial cells [44] (Fig. 2).
-
Fig. 2. Roles of EPS microbial exopolysaccharides in mitigation of abiotic stress and plant growth promotion.
Role of EPS in Mitigation of Drought Stress in Plants
One of the major agronomic complications that affect crop yields in arid and semi-arid regions all over the world is drought stress [45]. Prolonged periods of drought up to many years and intensely acute environments of drought have the potential to lead to food scarcity in some countries [2, 46]. Drought-inflicted areas are considered high stress environments due to inaccessibility of water and variations in environmental humidity. The development and yield of crops are highly restricted in arid and semi-arid regions that are affected by drought stress and the properties and stability of soils are adversely affected [47]. As a result, it is essential to understand the effects of drought on other environmental phenomena such as soil aggregation in order to learn how plant growth can be enhanced under drought conditions [47].
Arid and semi-arid areas harbor different clusters of microorganisms that aid in the growth of plants in stressed environments by several mechanisms such as ACC, phytohormone regulation, antioxidant production, volatile organic compounds, and EPS production [13, 19].Various studies have been done to prove the important roles of EPS in inducing survival mechanisms under drought stress [2, 19]. As EPS is hygroscopic in nature, it helps in maintaining high water content for the survival of microorganisms under drought conditions [6].
As discussed previously, the EPS produced by different bacterial strains improves soil aggregation and increases water permeability and nutrient uptake around the roots, thereby supporting plant growth and protecting plants from drought stress [7, 12]. EPS produced by
When EPS-producing
Drought stress increases levels of antioxidative enzymes and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plants [59]. However, when these plants are treated with EPS-producing bacteria, they show a significant increase in the levels of catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione peroxidase.
High proline concentration supports maintenance of high turgor pressure, which is important for maintaining metabolic and physiological activities in plant cells under drought conditions [62]. Also, EPS-producing Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) such as
Lu
Indigenous rhizobacteria capable of forming biofilms such as
Different
Another study reported that EPS-producing strains like
-
Table 2 . EPS-producing microbial strains in drought tolerance.
Microorganisms Crops Functions References Rhizobium sp. strain YAS34Sunflower Increase RAS/RT ratio, dry biomass, and nitrogen uptake [24] Pseudomonas mendocina Lactuca sativa L Increase in aggregate stability, water soluble, and total carbohydrates [50] Proteus penneri Pseudomonas aeruginosa Alcaligenes faccalis Maize Improve soil moisture content, leaf area, root length, shoot length, and plant biomass [56] Bacillus sp. (B. amyloliquefaciens ,B. licheniformis ,B. thuringiensis ,B. subtilis ,Paenibacillus favisporus )Maize Increase plant biomass, relative water content, water potential of leaf, RAS/RT ratio, and aggregate stability [11] Rhizobium leguminosarum Mesorhizobium ciceri Rizobium phaseoli Wheat Improve growth, biomass, and drought tolerance index [58] Rhizobium strain KYGT207Wheat Improve soil aggregation [48] Bacillus sp.
(B. licheniformis ,B. megaterium ,B. pumilus )Soybean Plant growth promotion [70] Klebsiella sp. IG3Wheat Improve soil aggregation, root adhering soil, and water potential around the roots [75] P. aeruginosa PM389P. aeruginosa ZNP1B.endophyticus J13B. tequilensis J12Increase phytohormones/EPS Enhance fresh weight, dry weight, and plant water content [68] Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6Arabidopsi s thaliana Reduce stomatal opening and wilting [72] B. amyloliquefaciens 54Tomato Increase survival rate, relative water content, and root vigor Decrease concentration of malondialdehyde Increase antioxidant enzyme activities Increase levels of stress-responsive genes ( lea ,tdi65 , andltpg2 )[96] B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42A. thaliana Increase survival rate, fresh and dry shoot weights, and primary root length Increase expression levels of drought defense-related marker genes, such as RD29A, RD17, ERD1 , andLEA14 Increase proline production and activities of superoxide dismutase and peroxidase[66] Pseudomonas fluorescens DR7P. fluorescens DR11Pseudomonas migulae DR35Enterobacter hormaechei DR16Foxtail millet Increase the RAS/RT Improve seed germination [71] P. fluorescens FAP2B. licheniformis B642Wheat Enhance vegetative growth
Enhance photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, transpiration rate (E), internal CO2 concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance (gs), net photosynthetic rate (PN), and leaf water potential (LWP) as compared to uninoculated control[62]
Role of EPS in Mitigation of Salinity Stress in Plants
The problem of increased soil salinity has become a global concern. Some international agencies that have actively participated in data collection regarding soil salinity around the world include the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization – United Nations Environment Programme (UNESCO-UNEP), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and the International Society of Soil Science (ISSS). According to the Soil Map of the World (FAO, 1971-1981), the problem of high soil salinity affects around 953 million hectares (Mha) worldwide. The FAO report on “Status of the World’s Soil Resources” stated that more than a hundred countries worldwide with a total estimated area of about one billion hectares faces the problem of high soil salinity [77].
High soil salinity mainly occurs due to excessive use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, lack of proper drainage systems and improper irrigation practices, and this high salt content in the soil turns out to be extremely damaging for crops [78]. Apart from drought, salinity is another common environmental stressor that adversely impacts plant growth and development and decreases crop yields in affected regions globally [79]. The negative effects on plant growth due to salinity can be attributed to osmotic stress, partial stomatal closure, or nutrient imbalance [80]. Some of these negative effects specifically include decreased energy and lipid metabolism, reduced capacity for chlorophyll content, photosynthesis, decrease in total nitrogen content, and reduced protein synthesis [80]. Salinity also causes oxidative stress in plants causing damage to protein, nucleic acid and lipids peroxidation resulting in loss of membrane integrity [81]. Salt stress-tolerant strains produce EPS in varying compositions and concentrations, enhancing germination and improving crop yields under environmental stress conditions [70, 82]. EPS works as a physical barricade in the soil protecting roots and promoting plant growth under high salinity conditions [72, 83]. EPS production by bacteria in high salinity soil enhances its physicochemical properties and promotes soil aggregate formation [83]. Microbes, especially bacteria, have the ability to impart salt-tolerance to plants and enhance their growth through various mechanisms in saline soil [84]. EPS binds with sodium ions thereby reducing the effects of high soil salinity and EPS produced by microbes mitigates salt stress by maintaining Na+/K+ balance that helps plant to survive under unfavorable soil conditions [85, 86]. EPS-producing salt-tolerant bacteria when inoculated in plants improved the ability of the plants to take up sodium, calcium, and potassium ions from the soil [73, 74]. EPS chelates sodium ions from around the roots thereby preventing the ions from reaching the stem and decreasing sodium absorption from the soil [87]. EPS chelates sodium ions from around the roots thereby preventing the ions from reaching the stem and decreasing sodium absorption from the soil [88]. An increase in salt concentration also stimulates an increase in EPS production which further leads to biofilm production [78, 82, 89] and further enhancement of Na + chelation. NaCl concentration in soil also determines the composition of EPS as increased rhamnose and trehalose were reported by Tewari and Arora [84]. These sugars help microbes to tolerate salt stress by providing carbon source, enhancing water retention.
Researchers have shown that both biofilm formation and EPS production result in several advantages to plants growing in a high salinity environment. They increase cell viability in the rhizosphere region thereby enhancing soil fertility and plant growth [88]. They protect plants from external stress, increase surface area for adhesion, provide high population densities, enhance plant tolerance to antimicrobial agents, and promote nutritional competition between microorganisms [90]. Various strategies adopted by microbes to alleviate salt stress include osmotic balancing, ion transport, and activating oxidative stress defense mechanisms [12, 90-92]. Also, microbes produce various phytohormones, ACC deaminase, siderophores and exopolysaccharides [92]. Studies using the halotolerant strain
Upadhyay
Qurashi and Sabri [82] demonstrated that the EPS-producing salt-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizosphere strains,
In a recent study, EPS-producing
This discussion concludes that bacterial exopolysaccharides ameliorate salinity stress by chelating free Na+ ion, making it available to plants, supporting soil aggregation and stability, enhancing biofilm formation, and contributing to water retention (Table 3). There are several reports on protection of plants in salinity by EPS-producing plant growth-promoting microorganisms, still, more studies are needed about change in physicochemical properties of EPS in saline environment.
-
Table 3 . Applications of EPS-producing salt-tolerant bacteria.
Microorganisms Crops PGP trait References Halmonas variabilis HT1 Planococcus refietoensis RT4Cicera rietinum Increase in fresh weight, dry weight, total soluble sugars and protein contents Increase soil aggregation and biofilm formation [82] Rhizobium meliloti Tomato EPS with high succinoglycan and galactoglucon [67] Bacillus sp., (B. licheniformis ,B. pumilus ,B. coagulans , andB. insolitus )Paenibacillus sp., (P. macerans )Microbacterium sp.Burkholderia cepacia Enterobacter sp.Wheat Rhizospheric soil aggregation Decrease Na+ uptake and root biofilm formation [12] Pseudomonas anguilliseptica SAW 24Faba bean Enhance plant height and fresh/dry weight [81] Rhizobium andPseudomonas Zea Mays Increase proline production Decrease electrolyte leakage along with maintenance of leaf relative water content and uptake of K+ [106] Bacillus isolates andMesorhizobium Cicer arietinum L. (Chickpea)Reduce concentration of Na+ in soil [104] Azotobacter chroococcum Vicia faba L.Enhanced N, P, and K concentrations, the proline content, RWC%, and the K+/Na+ ratio [99] Aeromonas spp. SAL-17 and SAL-21Wheat Increase in leaf proline content, nitrate reductase activity, chlorophyll a/b, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, root length, and shoot length [108] Aeromonas hydrophila/caviae MAS765,Bacillus insolitus MAS17, andBacillus sp. MAS617, MAS620, and MAS820Wheat Restricted passive flow of Na+ from the roots to stele in wheat crop and large root surface covered with soil [107] Marinobacter lipolyticus SM19 andB. subtilis subsp.inaquosorum Wheat Shoot and root dry weight Restricted Na+ uptake [94] [83] Pseudomonas aeruginosa PF07Hellianthus annuus Enhance Root Adhering Soil to Root Tissue ratio (RAS/RT)) and texture of the soil Increase porosity Improve uptake of nutrients [84] Enterobacter sp. MN17 andBacillus sp. MN54Quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa )Improved plant-water relations [105] Rhodopseudomonas palustris TN114 and PP803- Chelate Na +cations from aqueous environment [100]
Role of EPS in Mitigation of Metal Stress in Plants
Soil gets contaminated with heavy metals due to natural phenomena such as soil erosion, volcanic eruptions, weathering of minerals, and forest fires, or by anthropogenic activities such as excessive use of pesticides and chemical fertilizers, smelting, mining, automobile exhaust emissions, leather tanning, municipal waste disposal, textiles dyeing and processing, and manufacturing industrial activities [109]. Heavy metals are toxic in nature because they are non-biodegradable, mutagenic, carcinogenic, and teratogenic, have low bioavailability, and are highly soluble in aqueous environments [110]. The aqueous layer of the soil is a dynamic environment where chemical reactions, and circulation and transfer of heavy metals between bacteria, aqueous layer, and soil layer take place constantly [111]. Heavy metal stress has detrimental effects on plant growth by decreasing chlorophyll contents, blocking gas exchange factors and production of ROS, all of which impose oxidative stress [112].
Plant-associated microorganisms produce EPS and biosurfactants which help in maintaining soil structure and soil fertility in adverse toxic metal conditions [113]. Another study by Mishra
EPS affinity to heavy metals is due to electrostatic interactions which occur between heavy metal ions and surface functional groups of EPS such as hydroxyl and carboxyl. It binds with cationic heavy metals such as Cd2+, Co2+, Pb2+ and Ni2+ resulting in the formation of EPS-metal complexes [16]. Trivalent cations compete with divalent cations to bind with EPS, and trivalent cations form stronger bonds with EPS [114]. Cr (VI)-tolerant plant growth-promoting strain
Cyanobacterial EPS helps in preventing direct contact between these toxic metals and plant cells [117]. Jittaquttipoka
Many bacterial strains like
Gutehan
The
-
Table 4 . EPS-producing bacteria demonstrating metal tolerance.
Microbial Strain Metals Plants Roles of EPS References Cynobacterium synechocystis PCC6803Cadmium, Cobalt - Tolerance to stresses triggered by NaCl, CdSO4, CoCl2, or Fe starvation [117] Pseudomonas sp. W6Lead - Bio-adsorption of lead [118] A. calcoaceticus BS-27P. polymyxa FB-50P. putida BS-19P. fluorescens FB-49Iron, Manganese, lead, Zinc, Copper Acacia Increase root and shoot length, dry biomass, and metal tolerance [119] Bacillus gibsonii PM11Bacillus xiamenensis PM14Iron, Manganese, Cadmium, Zinc, Copper, Chromium Flax ( Linum usitatissimum L.)Enhance plant growth and nutrient availability by minimizing metalinduced stress Enhance phytoextraction of multimetals [116] Bacillus anthracis PM21Cadmium, Chromium Sesbania sesban Enhance seed germination, root and shoot length and photosynthetic pigment [121] Cellulosimicrobium funkei KM032184Chromium Phaseolus vulgaris LRoot Elongation, Shoot elongation, Antioxidant, [115] Halomonas speciesArsenic Avicennia marina Arsenic bioadsprtion, in vitro Na+ ion sequestration and antioxidant activity [120]
Role of EPS in Mitigation of Temperature Stress in Plants
High temperature-induced heat stress causes damage to crop plants, [124] subjecting global crop production to great peril [125]. Global warming could cause an increase in global temperature from 1.6 to 6°C by 2050 FAO [46]. A rise by one degree in temperature will lead to 20% decrease in water resources and this is a major concern for agricultural productivity [126]. Climate change affects plant metabolism, seed germination, and seedling growth, photosynthesis, chloroplast metabolism thereby reducing crop yields [127]. At high temperatures (30-38°C), delay in seed germination can be observed [120]. The reproductive stage of a plant is especially sensitive to high temperatures, and this has been demonstrated in chickpea [128], mungbean [129], sorghum [130], wheat [131], and lentil [132] plants. In tropical and temperate regions, flowering, number of flowers, and number of fruits in a plant are also affected by heat stress. Plant growth-promoting rhizosphere bacteria such as
Nguyena
Another investigation on the role of two bacterial strains,
Heat stress (45oC) affected knockout mutants
-
Table 5 . EPS-producing PGPR imparting tolerance to heat stress.
Microorganisms Crops Roles of EPS References Bacillus cereus Tomato Increase the number of flowers and fruits Increase chlorophyll, proline and antioxidants [135] Bacillus amyloliquefaciens UCMB5113Azospirillum brasilense NO40Wheat Increase HSP26 and chlorophyll content Accumulate GABA and modulate metabolic pathways [140] Pseudomonas sp. AKM-P6Sorghum Enhance tolerance of sorghum seedlings to elevated temperatures [134] Rhizobium sp. (Cajanus )Legume Heat shock protein (Hsp) of 63-74 kDa [29] Pseudomonas sp. PsJNPotato Promote growth [139] Bacillus aryabhattai H26-2 andBacillus siamensis H30-3Chinese cabbage Leaf abscisic acid (ABA) content and reduced stomatal opening after stresses treatments, Biocontrol activity against soft rot [140] Shinorizobium meliloti Medicago sativa Affect symbiosis during heat stress [142] Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA110Soybean Survival in starvation [143]
There are still many mechanisms needing to be explored for abiotic stress responses using plant growth-promoting rhizospheric bacteria and EPS and applied plant growth-promoting microorganism (PGPM) bacterial strains shown to improve crops growing under heat-stressed conditions.
Like high temperature stress, plant productivity is also deteriorated under cold stress. Psychrophiles and psychrotolerant microorganisms colonize permanently cold habitats, such as the polar regions, high altitudes and the deep sea and grow at temperatures ranging from subzero to 15oC. At high-altitude, psychrotolerant microbes sustain and maintain functionality in cold-temperature conditions, while growing optimally at warmer temperatures. Low temperature primarily causes irreversible freezing injury which includes dysfunction of plasma membrane and cellular dehydration [144]. Plant growth-promoting bacteria present within the root zone stimulate the increase in density of root hairs through various phytohormones and hence increase the uptake of water and nutrients. There are investigations reporting on the role of such microorganisms in protecting crops grown at low temperature. Psychrophilic
The above discussion supports that EPS-producing microorganisms are key players in sustaining and increasing the productivity of the existing agro-ecosystem through myriad roles under varied abiotic stress conditions (Fig. 3 Graphical Abstract).
Conclusion and Future Perspective
Agricultural productivity and crop yields can be affected by various environmental stressors such as drought, salinity, high temperatures, and heavy metals, all of which adversely affect plant growth and development, and eventually lead to global food scarcity. Recent investigations have identified several species of bacteria that impart stress tolerance properties to plants through various activities such as EPS production and biofilm formation, which help increase the nutrient uptake and water retention capacity of plants. These PGP bacteria have been extensively studied as bio-inoculants used to promote plant growth and seed germination in regions of heavy environmental stress. They have been demonstrated to possess several PGP traits such as the production of siderophores, IAA, phytohormones and EPS that make plants resistant to environmental stress. Although the review of literature has shown promising results in this area of research, further studies and field trials are needed to characterize the PGP attributes of EPS produced by microorganisms under different stress conditions that are beneficial to plant growth and metabolism. Also, elaborate research is needed on the reciprocal effect of abiotic stress and EPS composition and the physicochemical nature of EPS under such stress conditions. These studies would help to provide tools for alleviating abiotic stress in agricultural crops. The combined use of EPS-producing bacteria offers a promising strategy for multiple abiotic stress management for crop plants. Additionally, bacterial EPS is appropriate for maintaining soil composition, nutrients and fertility to improve plant growth and crop yields.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the authorities of Amity University Uttar Pradesh for providing the opportunity to prepare this review article.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
References
- Raza A, Razzaq A, Mehmood SS, Zou X, Zhang X, Lv Y,
et al . 2019. Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome: a review.Plants (Basel) 30 8 : 34. - Lesk C, Rowhani P, Ramankutty N. 2016. Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production.
Nature 529 : 84-87. - Etesami H, Beattie GA. 2017. Plant-microbe interactions in adaptation of agricultural crops to abiotic stress conditions, pp. 163-200.
In: Probiotics and Plant Health . Springer, Singapore. - Fita A, Rodríguez-Burruezo A, Boscaiu M, Prohens J, Vicente O. 2015. Breeding and domesticating crops adapted to drought and salinity: a new paradigm for increasing food production.
Front. Plant Sci. 6 : 978. - Basu A, Prasad P, Das SN, Kalam S, Sayyed RZ, Reddy MS,
et al . 2021. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) as green bioinoculants: recent developments, constraints, and prospects.Sustainability 13 : 1140. - Bashan Y, de-Bashan LE, Prabhu SR, Hernandez J-P. 2014. Advances in plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculant technology: formulations and practical perspectives (1998-2013).
Plant Soil 378 : 1-33. - Vejan P, Abdullah R, Khadiran T, Ismail S. 2016. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability-A review.
Molecules 21 : 573. - Paulin MM, Novinscak A, Lanteigne C, Gadkar VJ, Filion M. 2017. Interaction between 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol- and hydrogen cyanide-producing
Pseudomonas brassicacearum LBUM300 andClavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis in the tomato rhizosphere.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83 : e00073-17. - Prabhukarthikeyan SR, Keerthana U, Raguchander T. 2018. Antibiotic-producing
Pseudomonas fluorescens mediates rhizome rot disease resistance and promotes plant growth in turmeric plants.Microbiol. Res. 210 : 65-73. - Liu XM, Zhang H. 2015. The effects of bacterial volatile emissions on plant abiotic stress tolerance.
Front. Plant Sci. 6 : 774. - Khan N, Bano A, Rahman MA, Guo J. 2019. Comparative physiological and metabolic analysis reveals a complex mechanism involved in drought tolerance in chickpea (
Cicer arietinum L. ) induced by PGPR and PGRs.Sci. Rep. 9 : 2097. - Upadhyay SK, Singh JS, Saxena AK, Singh DP. 2012. Impact of PGPR inoculation on growth and antioxidant status of wheat under saline conditions.
Plant Biol. 14 : 605-611. - Yadav VK, Raghav M, Sharma SK, Bhagat N. 2020. Rhizobacteriome: promising candidate for conferring drought tolerance in crops.
J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 14 : 73-92. - Boonchai R, Kaewsuk J, Seo G. 2014. Effect of nutrient starvation on nutrient uptake and extracellular polymeric substance for microalgae cultivation and separation.
Desalin. Water Treat. 55 : 360-367. - Ilyas N, Mumtaz K, Akhtar N, Yasmin H, Sayyed RZ, Khan W,
et al . 2020. Exopolysaccharides producing bacteria for the amelioration of drought stress in wheat.Sustainability 12 : 8876. - Sayyed RZ, Patel PR, Shaikh SS. 2015. Plant growth promotion and root colonization by EPS producing
Enterobacter sp. RZS5 under heavy metal contaminated soil.Indian J. Exp. Biol. 53 : 116-123. - Shultana R, Tan Kee Zuan A, Yusop MR, Mohd Saud H, Ayanda AF. 2020. Effect of Salt-tolerant bacterial inoculations on rice seedlings differing in salt-tolerance under saline soil conditions.
Agronomy 10 : 1030. - Shaik, Zulfikar Ali, Vardharajula Sandhya, Minakshi Grover, Venkateswar Rao Linga, Venkateswarlu Bandi. 2011. Effect of inoculation with a thermotolerant plant growth promoting
Pseudomonas putida strain AKMP7 on growth of wheat (Triticum spp.) under heat stress.J. Plant Interact. 4 : 239-246. - Vardharajula S, Ali SZ. 2015. The production of exopolysaccharide by
Pseudomonas putida GAP-P45 under various abiotic stress conditions and its role in soil aggregation.Microbiology 84 : 512-519. - Saha I, Datta S, Biswas D. 2020. Exploring the role of bacterial extracellular polymeric substances for sustainable development in agriculture.
Curr. Microbiol. 77 : 3224-3239. - Mathur P, Roy S. 2021. Insights into the plant responses to drought and decoding the potential of root associated microbiome for inducing drought tolerance.
Physiol. Plant. 172 : 1016-1029. - Roca C, Alves VD, Freitas F, Reis MA. 2015. Exopolysaccharides enriched in rare sugars: bacterial sources, production, and applications.
Front. Microbiol. 6 : 288. - Mishra A, Jha B. 2013. Microbial exopolysaccharides.
In: Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F (eds),The Prokaryotes . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. - Alami Y, Achouak W, Marol C, Heulin T. 2000. Rhizosphere soil aggregation and plant growth promotion of sunflowers by exopolysaccharide producing
Rhizobium sp. strain isolated from sunflower roots.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66 : 33933398.108. - Schmid J, Sieber V, Rehm B. 2015. Bacterial exopolysaccharides: biosynthesis pathways and engineering strategies.
Front. Microbiol. 6 : 496. - Flemming HC, Wingender J. 2001. Relevance of microbial extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs)-parts I: structural and ecological aspects.
Water Sci. Technol. 43 : 1-8. - Czaczyk K, Myszka K. 2007. Biosynthesis of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and its role in microbial biofilm formation.
Polish J. Environ. Stud. 16 : 799-806. - Donot F, Fontana A, Baccou JC, Schorr-Galindo S. 2012. Microbial exopolysaccharides: main examples of synthesis, excretion, genetics and extraction.
Carbohydr. Polym. 87 : 951-962. - Sutherland IW. 2001. Microbial polysaccharides from Gram-negative bacteria.
Int. Dairy J. 11 : 663-674. - Velmourougane K, Prasanna R, Saxena AK. 2017. Agriculturally important microbial biofilms: present status and prospects.
J. Basic Microbiol. 57 : 548-573. - More TT, Yadav JSS, Yan S, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY. 2014. Extracellular polymeric substances of bacteria and their potential environmental applications.
J. Environ. Manage. 144 : 1-25. - Laspidou CS, Rittmann BE. 2002. A unified theory for extracellular polymeric substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass.
Water Res. 36 : 2711-20. - Drogue B, Combes-Meynet E, Moënne-Loccoz Y, Wisniewski-Dyé F, Prigent-Combaret C. 2013. "Control of the cooperation between plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and crops by rhizosphere signals," in Vol. 1 and 2, pp. 281-294.
In: F. J. de Bruijn (ed),Mol. Microb. Ecol. Rhizosphere, ed. . John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NJ, USA. - Prigent-Combaret C. 2013. "Control of the cooperation between plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and crops by rhizosphere signals," in Vol. 1 and 2, pp. 281-294.
In: Molecular Microbial Ecology of the Rhizosphere, ed. . John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NJ, USA. - Smith DL, Gravel V, Yergeau E. 2017. Editorial: signaling in the phytomicrobiome.
Front. Plant Sci. 8 : 611. - Miller MB, Bassler BL. 2001. Quorum sensing in bacteria.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 55 : 165-199. - Waters CM, Bassler BL. 2005. Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria.
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21 : 319-346. - Von Bodman SB, Majerczak DR, Coplin DL. 1998. A negative regulator mediates quorum-sensing control of exopolysaccharide production in
Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 : 7687-7692. - Kalia VC, Gong C, Patel SKS, Lee JK. 2021. Regulation of plant mineral nutrition by signal molecules.
Microorganisms 9 : 774. - Rosier A, Medeiros FHV, Bais HP. 2018. Defining plant growth promoting rhizobacteria molecular and biochemical networks in beneficial plant-microbe interactions.
Plant Soil 428 : 35-55. - Costa OYA, Raaijmakers JM, Kuramae EE. 2018. Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: ecological function and impact on soil aggregation.
Front. Microbiol. 23 : 1636. - Martin JP. 1971 Decomposition and binding action of polysaccharides in soil. Soil Biol.
Biochem. 3 : 33-41. - Hillel D. 1982. Introduction to soil Physics. Academic Press Limited, 24-28 Oval Road, London.
- Sengupta S, Dey S. 2019. Microbial exo-polysaccharides (EPS): role in agriculture and environment.
Agric. Food 1 : 4-8M. - Seleiman MF, Al-Suhaibani N, Ali N, Akmal M, Alotaibi M, Refay Y,
et al . 2021. Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects.Plants 10 : 259. - FAO. 2020. World Food and Agriculture - Statistical Yearbook 2020. Rome.
- Bouskill NJ, Wood TE, Baran R, Ye Z, Bowen BP, Lim H,
et al , , , . 2016b. Below ground response to drought in a tropical forest soil. I. Changes in microbial functional potential and metabolism.Front. Microbiol. 7 : 525. - Kaci Y, Heyraud A, Barakat M, Heulin T. 2005. Isolation and identification of an EPS-producing
Rhizobium strain from arid soil (Algeria): characterization of its EPS and the effect of inoculation on wheat rhizosphere soil structure.Res. Microbiol. 156 : 522-531. - Konnova Svetlana, Brykova O, Sachkova O, Egorenkova I, Ignatov V. 2001. Protective role of the polysaccharide-containing capsular components of
Azospirillum brasilense .Microbiology 70 : 436-440. - Kohler J, Fuensanta C, Roldan A. 2009. Effect of drought on the stability of Rhizosphere soil aggregates of
Lactuca sativa grown in a degraded soil inoculated with PGPR and AM fungi.Appl. Soil Ecol. 42 : 160-165. - Kohler J, Caravaca F, Carrasco L, Roldan A. 2006. Contribution of
Pseudomonas mendocina andGlomus intraradices to aggregate stabilization and promotion of biological fertility in rhizosphere soil of lettuce plants under field conditions.Soil Use Manage. 22 : 298-304. - Sandhya V, Ali SK, Minakshi G, Reddy G, Venkateswarlu B. 2009. Alleviation of drought stress effects in sunflower seedlings by the exopolysaccharides producing
Pseudomonas putida strain GAPP45.Biol. Fertil. Soils 46 : 17-26. - Vardharajula S, Sk ZA. 2014. Exopolysaccharide production by drought tolerant
Bacillus spp. and effect on soil aggregation under drought stress.J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 4 : 51-57. - Sayyed RZ, Jamadar D, Patel PR. 2011. Production of Exopolysaccharide by
Rhizobium sp.Indian J. Microbiol. 51 : 294-300. - Aureen LG, Saroj B. 2009. Sand aggregation by exopolysaccharide producing
Microbacterium arborescens -AGSB.Curr. Microbiol. 58 : 616-621. - Naseem H, Bano A. 2014. Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and their exopolysaccharide in drought tolerance of maize.
J. Plant Interact. 9 : 689-701. - Batool T, Ali S, Seleiman MF, Naveed NH, Ali A, Ahmed K,
et al . 2020. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria alleviates drought stress in potato in response to suppressive oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes activities.Sci. Rep. 10 : 16975. - Hussain MB, Zahir ZA, Asghar HN, Asghar M. 2014. Can catalase and exopolysaccharides producing rhizobia ameliorate drought stress in wheat?
Int. J. Agric. Biol. 16 : 3-13. - Zhang X, Yang Z, Li Z, Zhang F, Hao L. 2020. Effects of drought stress on physiology and antioxidative activity in two varieties of
Cynanchum thesioides .Braz. J. Bot. 43 : 1-10. - Khan N, Bano A. 2019. Exopolysaccharide producing rhizobacteria and their impact on growth and drought tolerance of wheat grown under rainfed conditions.
PLoS One 14 : e0222302. - Yadav J, Verma JP, Tiwari KN. 2010. Effect of plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria on seed germination and plant growth Chickpea (
Cicer arietinum L) under in vitro condition Biological Forum.Int. J. 2 : 15-18. - Ansari FA, Ahmad I. 2019. Fluorescent pseudomonas-FAP2 and
Bacillus licheniformis interact positively in biofilm mode enhancing plant growth and photosynthetic attributes.Sci. Rep. 9 : 4547. - Ali SZ, Sandhya V, Venkateswar Rao L. 2014. Isolation and characterization of drought-tolerant ACC deaminase and exopolysaccharide-producing fluorescent
Pseudomonas sp.Ann. Microbiol. 64 : 493-502. - Lim JH, Kim SD. 2013. Induction of drought stress resistance by multi-functional PGPR
Bacillus licheniformis K11 in pepper.Plant Pathol. J. 29 : 201-208. - Khan N, Bano A, Curá JA. 2020. Role of beneficial microorganisms and salicylic acid in improving rainfed agriculture and future food safety.
Microorganisms 8 : 1018. - Lu X, Liu SF, Yue L, Zhao X, Zhang Y-B, Xie Z-K,
et al . 2018. Epsc involved in the encoding of exopolysaccharides produced byBacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 act to boost the drought tolerance ofArabidopsis thaliana .Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19 : 3795. - Wang DC, Jiang CH, Zhang LN, Chen L, Zhang XY, Guo JH. 2019. Biofilms positively contribute to
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 54-induced drought tolerance in tomato plants.Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 : 6271. - Ghosh D, Gupta A, Mohapatra S. 2019. A comparative analysis of exopolysaccharide and phytohormone secretions by four drought-tolerant rhizobacterial strains and their impact on osmotic-stress mitigation in
Arabidopsis thaliana .World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 35 : 90. - Igiehon NO, Babalola OO, Aremu BR. 2019. Genomic insights into plant growth promoting rhizobia capable of enhancing soybean germination under drought stress.
BMC Microbiol. 19 : 159. - Susilowati A, Puspita AA, Yunus A. 2018. Drought resistant of bacteria producing exopolysaccharide and IAA in rhizosphere of soybean plant (Glycine max) in Wonogiri Regency Central Java Indonesia. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 142 (2018) 012058.
- Niu X, Song L, Xiao Y, Ge W. 2018. Drought-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria associated with foxtail millet in a semiarid agroecosystem and their potential in alleviating drought stress.
Front. Microbiol. 8 : 2580. - Cho SM, Anderson AJ, Kim YC. 2018. Extracellular polymeric substances of
Pseudomonas chlororaphis 06 induce systemic drought tolerance in plants.Res. Plant Dis. 24 : 242-247. - Vardharajula S, Ali Sk Z. 2014. Exopolysaccharide production by drought tolerant
Bacillus spp. and effect on soil aggregation under drought stress.J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 4 : 51-57. - Timmusk S, Abd El-Daim IA, Copolovici L, Tanilas T, Kännaste A, Behers L,
et al . 2014. Drought-tolerance of wheat improved by rhizosphere bacteria from harsh environments: enhanced biomass production and reduced emissions of stress volatiles.PLoS One 9 : e96086. - Gontia-Mishra I, Sapre S, Sharma A, Tiwari S. 2016. Amelioration of drought tolerance in wheat by the interaction of plantgrowthpromoting rhizobacteria.
Plant Biol. 18 : 992-1000. - Camaille M, Fabre N, Clément C, Ait Barka E. 2021. Advances in wheat physiology in response to drought and the role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to trigger drought tolerance.
Microorganisms 9 : 687. - FAO, ITPS, GSBI, CBD, EC. 2020. State of knowledge of soil biodiversity - Status, challenges and potentialities, Report 2020. FAO, Rome.
- Deng J, Orner EP, Chau JF, Anderson EM, Kadilak AL, Rubinstein RL,
et al . 2015. Synergistic effects of soil microstructure and bacterial EPS on drying rate in emulated soil micromodels.Soil Biol. Biochem. 83 : 116-124. - Ma Y, Dias MC, Freitas H. 2020. Drought and salinity stress responses and microbe-induced tolerance in plants.
Front. Plant Sci. 11 : 591911. - Parida SK, Das AB. 2005. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants.
Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 60 : 324-349. - Gupta B, Huang B. 2014. Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization.
Int. J. Genomics 2014 : 701596. - Qurashi AW, Sabri AN. 2012a. Bacterial exopolysaccharide and biofilm formation stimulate chickpea growth and soil aggregation under salt stress.
Braz. J. Microbiol. 43 : 1183-1191. - Minah B, Hazarin Subair F. 2015. Isolation and Screening bacterial exopolysaccharide (EPS) from potato rhizosphere in highland and the potential as a producer indole acetic acid (IAA).
Procedia Food Sci. 3 : 74-81. - Tewari S, Arora NK. 2014a. Multifunctional exopolysaccharides from
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PF23 involved in plant growth stimulation, biocontrol and stress amelioration in sunflower under saline conditions.Curr. Microbiol. 69 : 484-494. - Singh RP, Jha PN. 2016. A halotolerant bacterium
Bacillus licheniformis HSW-16 augments induced systemic tolerance to salt stress in wheat plant (Triticum aestivum ).Front. Plant Sci. 7 : 1890. - 2013. Isolation, screening and optimization of exopolysaccharide producing bacterium from saline soil.
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Res. 3 : 24-31. - Choudhary DK, Kasotia A, Jain S, Vaishnav A, Kumari S, Sharma KP,
et al . 2015. Bacterial-mediated tolerance and resistance to plants under abiotic and biotic stress.J. Plant Growth Regul. 35 : 276-300. - Ashraf M, Berge SH, Mahmood OT. 2004. Inoculating wheat seedling with exopolysaccharides-producing bacteria restrict sodium uptake and stimulates plant growth under salt stress.
Biol. Fertil Soils 40 : 157-162. - Arora M, Kaushik A, Rani N, Kaushik CP. 2010. Effect of cyanobacterial exopolysaccharides on salt stress alleviation and seed germination.
J. Environ. Biol. 31 : 701-704. - Ha-Tran DM, Nguyen TTM, Hung SH, Huang E, Huang CC. 2021. Roles of plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) in stimulating salinity stress defense in plants: a review.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 : 3154. - Yasmeen T, Ahmad A, Arif MS, Mubin M, Rehman K, Shahzad SM,
et al . 2020. Biofilm forming rhizobacteria enhance growth and salt tolerance in sunflower plants by stimulating antioxidant enzymes activity.Plant Physiol. Biochem. 156 : 242-256. - Bhat MA, Kumar V, Bhat MA, Wani IA, Dar FL, Farooq I,
et al . 2020. Mechanistic Insights of the interaction of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) with plant roots toward enhancing plant productivity by alleviating salinity stress.Front. Microbiol. 20 : 1952. - Lloret J, Wulff BB, Rubio JM, Downie JA, Bonilla I, Rivilla R. 1998. Exopolysaccharide II production is regulated by salt in the halotolerant strain
Rhizobium meliloti EFB1.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64 : 1024-1028. - Atouei MT, Pourbabaee AA, Shorafa M. 2019. Alleviation of salinity stress on some growth parameters of wheat by exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria.
Ir. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A. 43 : 2725-2733. - Chu TN, Tran BTH, Van Bui L, Hoang MTT. 2019. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium
Pseudomonas PS01 induces salt tolerance inArabidopsis thaliana .BMC Res. Notes 12 : 11. - Wang J, Song L, Gong X, Xu J, Li M. 2020. Functions of jasmonic acid in plant regulation and response to abiotic stress.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 : 1446. - Sultana S, Paul SC, Parveen S, Alam S, Rahman N, Jannat B,
et al . 2020. Isolation and identification of salt-tolerant plant-growthpromoting rhizobacteria and their application for rice cultivation under salt stress.Can. J. Microbiol. 66 : 144-160. - Liu X, Luo Y, Li Z, Wang J, Wei G. 2017. Role of exopolysaccharide in salt stress resistance and cell motility of
Mesorhizobium alhagi CCNWXJ12-2T.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 101 : 2967-2978. - Abd El-Ghany, Mona FA Attia, Magdy. 2020. Effect of exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria and melatonin on faba bean production in saline and non-saline soil agronomy
10 : 316. - Nunkaew T, Kantachote D, Nitoda T, Kanzaki H, Ritchie RJ. 2015. Characterization of exopolymeric substances from selected
Rhodopseudomonas palustris strains and their ability to adsorb sodium ions.Carbohydr. Polym. 22 : 115: 334-41. - Amna Xia Y, Farooq MA, Javed MT, Kamran MA, Mukhtar T, Ali J,
et al . 2020. Multi-stress tolerant PGPRBacillus xiamenensis PM14 activating sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) red rot disease resistance.Plant Physiol. Biochem. 151 : 1640-1649. - Oosten V, Stasio MJ, Cirillo ED, Silletti V, Ventorino S, Pepe V, Raimondi O, Maggio GA. 2018. Root inoculation with
Azotobacter chroococcum 76A enhances tomato plants adaptation to salt stress under low N conditions.BMC Plant Biol. 18 : 205. - Mohammad AF. 2018. Effectiveness of exopolysaccharides and biofilm forming plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on salinity tolerance of faba bean (
Vicia faba L.).Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 12 : 399-404. - Kumari P, Khanna V. 2015. ACC-deaminase and EPS production by salt tolerant rhizobacteria augment growth in chickpea under salinity stress.
Int. J. Bio-resource Stress Manage. 6 : 558-565. - Yang A, Akhtar SS, Iqbal S, Amjad M, Naveed M, Zahir ZA,
et al . 2016. Enhancing salt tolerance in quinoa by halotolerant bacterial inoculation.Funct. Plant Biol. 43 : 632-642. - Bano A, Fatima M. 2009. Salt tolerance in
Zea mays (L). following inoculation withRhizobium andPseudomonas .Biol. Fertil. Soils 45 : 405-413. - Ashraf M, Ahmad MSA, Ozturk M, Aksoy A. 2012. Crop improvement through different means, pp. 1-15.
In: Ashraf,et al (ed),Crop Production for Agricultural Improvement . Springer. - Nawaz MS, Arshad A, Rajput L, Fatima K, Ullah S, Ahmad M,
et al . 2020. Growth-stimulatory effect of quorum sensing signal moleculeN -Acyl-Homoserine lactone-producing multi-traitAeromonas spp. on wheat genotypes under salt stress.Front. Microbiol. 29 : 11:553621. - Chibuike GU, Obiora SC. 2014. Heavy metal polluted soils: effect on plants and bioremediation methods.
Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2014 : 1-12. - Adrees M, Ali S, Rizwan M, Zia-Ur-Rehman M, Ibrahim M, Abbas F,
et al . 2015. Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of heavy metal toxicity in plants: a review.Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 119 : 186-97. - Violante A, Cozzolino V, Perelomov L, Caporale AG, Pigna M. 2010. Mobility and bioavailability of heavy metals and metalloids in soil environments.
J. Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr. 10 : 268-292. - Mishra J, Singh R, Arora N K. 2017. Alleviation of heavy metal stress in plants and remediation of soil by rhizosphere microorganisms.
Front. Microbiol. 8 : 1706. - Ayangbenro AS, Babalola OO. 2017. A New strategy for heavy metal polluted environments: a review of microbial biosorbents.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14 : 94. - Dobrowolski R, Szcześ A, Czemierska M, Jarosz-Wikołazka A. 2017. Studies of cadmium (II), lead (II), nickel (II), cobalt (II) and chromium (VI) sorption on extracellular polymeric substances produced by Rhodococcus opacus and
Rhodococcus rhodochrous .Bioresour. Technol. 225 : 113-120. - Karthik C, Elangovan N, Kumar TS, Govindharaju S, Barathi S, Oves M,
et al . 2017. Characterization of multifarious plant growth promoting traits of rhizobacterial strain AR6 under Chromium (VI) stress.Microbiol. Res. 204 : 65-71. - Zainab N, Bashir Ud Din A, Muhammad Tariq Javed M, Siddique Afridi M, Tehmeena Mukhtar, Kamran Muhammad Aqeel,
et al . 2020. Deciphering metal toxicity responses of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) with exopolysaccharide and ACC-deaminase producing bacteria in industrially contaminated soils.Plant Physiol. Biochem. 152 : 90-99. - Jittawuttipoka T, Planchon M, Spalla O, Benzerara K, Guyot F, Cassier-Chauvat C,
et al . 2013. Multidisciplinary evidences that synechocystis PCC6803 exopolysaccharides operate in cell sedimentation and protection against salt and metal stresses.PLoS One 8 : e55564. - Kalita D, Joshi SR. 2017. Study on bioremediation of Lead by exopolysaccharide producing metallophilic bacterium isolated from extreme habitat.
Biotechnol. Rep. 16 : 48-57. - Getahun A, Muleta D, Assefa F, Kiros S. 2020. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolated from degraded habitat enhance drought tolerance of acacia (
Acacia abyssinica Hochst .ex Benth.) seedlings.Int. J. Microbiol. 2020 : 8897998. - Mukherjee P, Mitra A, Roy M. 2019.
Halomonas Rhizobacteria ofAvicennia marina of indian sundarbans promote rice growth under saline and heavy metal stresses through exopolysaccharide production.Front. Microbiol. 10 : 1207. - Ali J, Ali F, Ahmad I, Rafique M, Munis MFH, Hassan SW,
et al . 2020. Mechanistic elucidation of germination potential and growth of Sesbania sesban seedlings withBacillus anthracis PM21 under heavy metals stress: an in vitro study.Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 208 : 111769. - Thijs S, Sillen W, Weyens N, Vangronsveld J. 2017. Phytoremediation: 2017. State-of-the-art and a key role for the plant microbiome in future trends and research prospects.
Int. J. Phytoremed. 19 : 23-38. - Mosa KA, Saadoun I, Kumar K, Helmy M, Dhankher OP. 2016. Potential biotechnological strategies for the clean up of heavy metals and metalloids Front.
Plant Sci. 7 : 303. - Teixeira EI, Fischer G, Velthuizen HV, Walter C, Ewert F. 2013. Global hot spots of heat stress on agricultural crops due to climate change.
Agric. Meteorol. 170 : 206-215. - FAO. 2017. Water Scarcity - One of the greatest challenges of our time. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- Fahad S, Bajwa AA, Nazir U, Anjum SA, Farooq A, Zohaib A,
et al . 2017. Crop production under drought and heat stress: plant responses and management options.Front. Plant Sci. 8 : 1147. - Kumar S, Thakur P, Kaushal N, Malik J, A Gaur P, Nayyar H. 2013. Effect of varying high temperatures during reproductive growth on reproductive function, oxidative stress and seed yield in chickpea genotypes differinginheat sensitivity.
Arch. Agronomy Soil Sci. 59 : 823-843. - Devasirvatham V, Gaur PM, Mallikarjuna N, Tokachichu RN, Trethowan RM, Tan DK. 2012. Effect of high temperature on the reproductive development of chickpea genotypes under controlled environments.
Funct. Plant Biol. 39 : 1009-1018. - Kaur R, Bains TS, Bindumadhava H, Nayyar H. 2015. Responses of mungbean (
Vigna radiata L.) genotypes to heat stress: effects on reproductive biology, leaf function and yield traits.Sci. Hortic. 197 : 527-541. - Prasad PV V, Djanaguiraman M, Perumal R, Ciampitti IA. 2015. Impact of high temperature stress on floret fertility and individual grain weight of grain sorghum: sensitive stages and thresholds for temperature and duration.
Front. Plant Sci. 6 : 1-11. - Farooq M, Bramley H, Palta JA, Siddique KHM. 2011. Heat stress in wheat during reproductive and grain-filling phases.
CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 30 : 491-507. - Sita K, Sehgal A, Kumar J, Kumar S, Singh S, Siddique KH,
et al . 2017. Identification of high-temperature tolerant lentil (Lens culinaris Medik. ) genotypes through leaf and pollen traits.Front. Plant Sci. 8 : 1-26. - Bramhachari PV, Nagaraju GP, Kariali E. 2018. Current perspectives on rhizobacterial-EPS interactions in alleviation of stress responses: novel strategies for sustainable agricultural productivity. In Role of Rhizospheric Microbes in Soil.
Springer: Singapore. 2018 : 33-55. - Ali SZ, Sandhya V, Grover M, Linga VR, Bandi V. 2011. Effect of inoculation with a thermo-tolerant plant growth promoting
Pseudomonas putida strain AKMP7 on growth of wheat (Triticum spp.) under heat stress.J. Plant. Interact. 6 : 239-246. - Mukhtar T, Rehman S, Smith D, Sultan T, Seleiman M, Alsadon A,
et al . 2020. Mitigation of heat stress inSolanum lycopersicum L. by ACC-deaminase and exopolysaccharide. ProducingBacillus cereus : effects on biochemical profiling.Sustainability 12 : 2159. - Parsell DA, Lindquist S. 1993. The function of heat shock proteins in stress tolerance: degradation and reactivation of damaged proteins.
Annu. Rev. Genet. 27 : 437-496. - Nandal K, Sehrawat AR, Yadav AS, Vashishat RK, Boora KS. 2005. High temperature-induced changes in exopolysaccharides, lipopolysaccharides, and protein profile of heat-resistant mutants of
Rhizobium sp. (Cajanus).Microbiol. Res. 160 : 367-373. - Nguyena HT, Razafindralambo H, Blecker C, N'Yapoa C, Thonart P, Delvignea F. 2014. Stochastic exposure to sub-lethal high temperature enhances exopolysaccharides (EPS) excretion and improves
Bifidobacterium bifidum cell survival to freeze-drying.Biochem. Eng. J. 88 : 85-94. - Bensalim S, Nowak J, Asiedu SK. 1998. A plant growth promoting rhizobacterium and temperature effects on performance of 18 clones of potato.
Am. J. Pot. Res. 75 : 145-152. - Abd El-Daim IA, Bejai S, Fridborg I, Meijer J. 2018. Identifying potential molecular factors involved in
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 5113 mediated abiotic stress tolerance in wheat.Plant Biol. 20 : 271-279. - Shin DJ, Yoo SJ, Hong JK, Weon HY, Song J, Sang MK. 2019. Effect of
Bacillus aryabhattai H26-2 andB. siamensis H30-3 on Growth promotion and alleviation of heat and drought stresses in Chinese cabbage.Plant Pathol. J. 35 : 178-187. - Ogden AJ, McAleer JM, Kahn ML. 2019. Characterization of the
Sinorhizobium meliloti HslUV and ClpXP protease systems in freeliving and symbiotic states.J. Bacteriol. 201 : e00498-18. - Nishihata S, Kondo T, Tanaka K,
et al . 2018.Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA110 PhaR functions for pleiotropic regulation of cellular processes besides PHB accumulation.BMC Microbiol. 18 : 156. - Mishra PK, Bisht SC, Ruwari P, Selvakumar G, Joshi GK, Bisht JK,
et al . 2018. Alleviation of cold stress in inoculated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings with psychrotolerantPseudomonads from NW Himalayas.Arch Microbiol. 193 : 497-513. - Zubair M, Hanif A, Farzand A, Sheikh T, Suleman M, Khan AR,
et al . 2019. Genetic screening and expression analysis of psychrophilicBacillus spp. reveal their potential to alleviate cold stress and modulate phytohormones in wheat.Microorganisms 7 : 337. - Ait Barka E, Nowak J, Clément C. 2006. Enhancement of chilling resistance of inoculated grapevine plantlets with a plant growth promoting
Rhizobacterium ,Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72 : 7246-7252. - Fernandez O, Theocharis A, Bordiec S, Feil R, Jacquens L, Clément C,
et al . 2012.Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN acclimates grapevine to cold by modulating carbohydrate metabolism.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 25 : 496-504. - Wang C, Wang C, Gao YL, Wang Y-P, Guo J-H. 2016. A Consortium of three plant growth-promoting
Rhizobacterium strains acclimatesLycopersicon esculentum and confers a better tolerance to chilling stress.J. Plant Growth Regul. 35 : 54-64. - Abd El-Daim IA, Bejai S, Meijer J. 2019.
Bacillus velezensis 5113 Induced metabolic and molecular reprogramming during abiotic stress tolerance in wheat.Sci. Rep. 9 : 16282.
Related articles in JMB

Article
Review
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021; 31(8): 1045-1059
Published online August 28, 2021 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2105.05009
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Bacterial Exopolysaccharides: Insight into Their Role in Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance
Neeta Bhagat*, Meenu Raghav, Sonali Dubey, and Namita Bedi
Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Sector 125, Noida 201301, India
Correspondence to:Neeta Bhagat, nbhagat@amity.edu
Abstract
Various abiotic stressors like drought, salinity, temperature, and heavy metals are major environmental stresses that affect agricultural productivity and crop yields all over the world. Continuous changes in climatic conditions put selective pressure on the microbial ecosystem to produce exopolysaccharides. Apart from soil aggregation, exopolysaccharide (EPS) production also helps in increasing water permeability, nutrient uptake by roots, soil stability, soil fertility, plant biomass, chlorophyll content, root and shoot length, and surface area of leaves while also helping maintain metabolic and physiological activities during drought stress. EPS-producing microbes can impart salt tolerance to plants by binding to sodium ions in the soil and preventing these ions from reaching the stem, thereby decreasing sodium absorption from the soil and increasing nutrient uptake by the roots. Biofilm formation in high-salinity soils increases cell viability, enhances soil fertility, and promotes plant growth and development. The third environmental stressor is presence of heavy metals in the soil due to improper industrial waste disposal practices that are toxic for plants. EPS production by soil bacteria can result in the biomineralization of metal ions, thereby imparting metal stress tolerance to plants. Finally, high temperatures can also affect agricultural productivity by decreasing plant metabolism, seedling growth, and seed germination. The present review discusses the role of exopolysaccharide-producing plant growth-promoting bacteria in modulating plant growth and development in plants and alleviating extreme abiotic stress condition. The review suggests exploring the potential of EPS-producing bacteria for multiple abiotic stress management strategies.
Keywords: Exopolysaccharides (EPS), drought, abiotic stress, salinity, metal, biofilm
Introduction
Abiotic stresses like drought, salinity, heavy metals, and high or low temperature are major constraints to crop production by being detrimental to the physical, metabolic, and growth development of plants [1]. Plants are often subjected to multiple stresses which are aggravated by climatic changes, use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides and environmental pollution. This situation is more alarming with the increase in world population which is expected to reach around 10 billion by 2050 [2]. There is an urgent need to increase food production by 70% to meet the demand [2]. It is also imperative to find ways to implement new agricultural strategies to protect crops from these multiple abiotic stressors [3].
Currently, there are several approaches that enhance plant tolerance to abiotic stress. These include water-conserving irrigation strategies, traditional methods of breeding, and genetic engineering of transgenic plants with abiotic stress tolerance [4]. Plant growth-promoting rhizosphere microorganisms are also now being widely used for restoring soil fertility, remediation of chemical pollutants and to sustain plant growth [5]. They are a proven, effective alternative to conventional methods and a promising strategy for mitigating abiotic stresses. The use of plant growth-promoting microorganisms is a simple alternative approach to genetic engineering and breeding methods for crop improvement since these procedures are time-consuming, expensive, and laborious [6]. These microorganisms improve the root and shoot growth, thus enhancing the water and nutrient absorption from soil [7]. Different types of plant metabolites, such as HCN, 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (DAPG) [8], antibiotics,
Interestingly, the composition and concentration of the EPS that is produced varies in different strains, leading to various structural and functional types of EPS [22].The quantity and components of the EPS produced by bacteria depend on several factors such as type of bacteria, time of cultivation, state of growth, and availability of substrate [3, 23]. Therefore, the diversity of constituents present in the EPS imparts unique properties such as enhancement of water absorption and holding capacity of bacteria in the soil by means of aggregate formation [24]. Although EPS-producing bacteria are ubiquitously distributed in nature, there is a gap in knowledge with regard to the factors that are involved in the regulation, synthesis and variations in composition of EPS produced by plant growth-promoting bacteria in response to different abiotic stresses.
EPS-producing strains are more efficient in imparting resistance to abiotic stress compared to plant growth-promoting rhizosphere bacteria originated from the non-stress ecosystem [25]. Presence of these EPS strains influences plant growth and thus such bacteria are promising candidate biostimulants for stress management strategies for plant growth and development [25]. In the present review we discuss the role of exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria in combating abiotic stress in plants.
Bacterial EPSs
EPSs are extracellular polymers of bacterial origin. They are produced in response to environmental signals as an energy exchange mechanism [26]. ESPs are a complex mixture of diverse types of biomolecules forming a 3D structural matrixome containing polysaccharides, sugars, structural proteins, enzymes, amino sugars, nucleic acids, lipids, pyruvates, glycoproteins, lipids, extracellular DNA, and some humic substances [23]. Each of these components vary in physicochemical properties and functions. Acetate esters, pyruvates, formates, and succinates are the common extracellular carbohydrate substituents found in EPS [27]. The EPS backbone contains repeating units of monosaccharides, classified as homopolysaccharides and heteropolysaccharides [28]. Homopolymers are made up of single sugars such as pentoses (arabinose, and xylose), hexoses (glucose, galactose, mannose, allose), desoxyhexoses (rhamnose, fucose), amino sugars (glucosamine and galactosamine), or uronic acids (glucuronic acids and galacturonic acids) linked by strong 1,4-
These polysaccharides are responsible for cell adhesion, cell aggregation and water retention while forming a protective barrier and providing nutrient sources. In addition, proteins in the matrix provide binding enzymes (adhesins), electron acceptors and donors, and facilitate the absorption of organic and inorganic material. EPS amino acids serve as carbon and nitrogen sources for bacteria [30]. Nucleic acid also serves as source nutrients and genetic information. Humic substance supports adhesion and provides electron donor and acceptor [31]. In general, bacteria produce two types of EPS:capsular EPS (CPS), which is attached to the cell surface, and released polysaccharides (RPS-EPS), which are released by the bacterial cell into the surroundings. Extracellular enzymes of EPS facilitate nutrient absorption from aqueous medium and help in distribution as EPS changes from soluble to filamentous matrix form [32]. EPS helps in cohesion of bacteria, adhesion of biofilm to the root surface, and enables exchange of metabolic signaling information amongst bacteria to form a stable population with synergistic relationship [33]. There are 4 steps involved in the biosynthesis of EPS: 1) absorption, activation and conversion of monosaccharides into sugar nucleotides in the cytoplasm; 2) assembly of sugar nucleotide repeat units by the sequential addition of each unit on a lipid carrier molecule with the help of glycosyltransferase; 3) polymerization of these repeat units that occurs at the periplasmic side of the plasma membrane, and 4) exudation of EPS to the cell surface [32] (Fig. 1). The matrix of EPSs holds an assembly of microbial colonies to form biofilm. Formation of biofilms is regulated by multiple factors including metabolic signaling of quorum sensing [33]. Roots usually release secondary metabolite like phenolics, organic acids, amino acids and phytohormones, and siderophores in the form of root exudates. These exudates serve as chemoattractants for microbes associated with roots by electrostatic interaction and later develop the biofilm [34]. The quorum sensing (QS) system plays an important role in plant-microbe and microbe-microbe interactions in root harboring bacteria which promote plant growth during stress [35]. Strigolactones have been the signal molecules for plant microbe communication facilitating entry of bacteria into the roots of the plant. In bacteria two QS pathways (autoinducer-1 [AI-1] and autoinducer-2 [AI-2]) have been reported in bacteria (Miller, Waters) [35-37]. QS signal molecules, N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs), are commonly secreted in gram-negative bacteria, while autoinducer peptides are found in gram-positive bacteria. The AHLs serve as signaling molecules responsible for regulating the microbial population density in biofilm [36, 41]. The bacteria QS system helps bacteria acquire nutrition, ferric ions by siderophores, provides stress tolerance and produces antibiotics to inhibit pathogens [38]. QS signals also enhance root elongation, nodulation, and production of growth promoters like auxin and flavonoids to promote plant growth [38-40].
-
Figure 1. Steps involved in biosynthesis of bacterial exopolysaccharides.
Microbial EPSs improve the quality and fertility of soil [41]. High-molecular-weight polymers in EPS help soil bacteria attach to the exterior of soil particles and sustain the collected particles. The EPSs adhere to soil surfaces through hydrogen binding, cation bonds, anion adsorption, and van der Waal’s forces [42]. By decreasing wetting and swelling, this organic outcome may facilitate the firmness of the soil aggregate aeration, permeation, root penetration, and decrease runoff [42]. EPS helps in microaggregation of soil by forming a organo-mineral sheath which improves the soil structure and provides stability to soil under stress conditions [41, 43] (Table 1).
-
Table 1 . EPS-producing bacterial strains in soil aggregation..
Microorganisms Roles of EPS References Microbacterium arborescens Cementing of soil particles [55] Bacillus sp.Soil aggregation [88] Pseudomonas mendocina Promote soil fertility and stabilization [51] Rhizobium sp.Soil aggregation
Increase in water holding capacity of soil in rhizosphere[48] Pseudomonas putida strain GAP-p45Soil aggregation increase root adherence stability Biofilm formation on surface of root of sunflower seedling [52]
Many plant growth-promoting rhizosphere bacteria maintain plant-water relations, ion homeostasis and photosynthetic efficiency in plants under drought and salt stress. Stress alleviation involves a complex signalling network operating as a result of plant–microbe interaction [35]. Thus, EPS as nutrient facilitator and adhesive matrix for attaching microbes to plants plays an important mediator in maintaining plant heath in abiotic stress. A positive correlation exists between abiotic stress and production of EPS by bacterial cells [44] (Fig. 2).
-
Figure 2. Roles of EPS microbial exopolysaccharides in mitigation of abiotic stress and plant growth promotion.
Role of EPS in Mitigation of Drought Stress in Plants
One of the major agronomic complications that affect crop yields in arid and semi-arid regions all over the world is drought stress [45]. Prolonged periods of drought up to many years and intensely acute environments of drought have the potential to lead to food scarcity in some countries [2, 46]. Drought-inflicted areas are considered high stress environments due to inaccessibility of water and variations in environmental humidity. The development and yield of crops are highly restricted in arid and semi-arid regions that are affected by drought stress and the properties and stability of soils are adversely affected [47]. As a result, it is essential to understand the effects of drought on other environmental phenomena such as soil aggregation in order to learn how plant growth can be enhanced under drought conditions [47].
Arid and semi-arid areas harbor different clusters of microorganisms that aid in the growth of plants in stressed environments by several mechanisms such as ACC, phytohormone regulation, antioxidant production, volatile organic compounds, and EPS production [13, 19].Various studies have been done to prove the important roles of EPS in inducing survival mechanisms under drought stress [2, 19]. As EPS is hygroscopic in nature, it helps in maintaining high water content for the survival of microorganisms under drought conditions [6].
As discussed previously, the EPS produced by different bacterial strains improves soil aggregation and increases water permeability and nutrient uptake around the roots, thereby supporting plant growth and protecting plants from drought stress [7, 12]. EPS produced by
When EPS-producing
Drought stress increases levels of antioxidative enzymes and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plants [59]. However, when these plants are treated with EPS-producing bacteria, they show a significant increase in the levels of catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione peroxidase.
High proline concentration supports maintenance of high turgor pressure, which is important for maintaining metabolic and physiological activities in plant cells under drought conditions [62]. Also, EPS-producing Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) such as
Lu
Indigenous rhizobacteria capable of forming biofilms such as
Different
Another study reported that EPS-producing strains like
-
Table 2 . EPS-producing microbial strains in drought tolerance..
Microorganisms Crops Functions References Rhizobium sp. strain YAS34Sunflower Increase RAS/RT ratio, dry biomass, and nitrogen uptake [24] Pseudomonas mendocina Lactuca sativa L Increase in aggregate stability, water soluble, and total carbohydrates [50] Proteus penneri Pseudomonas aeruginosa Alcaligenes faccalis Maize Improve soil moisture content, leaf area, root length, shoot length, and plant biomass [56] Bacillus sp. (B. amyloliquefaciens ,B. licheniformis ,B. thuringiensis ,B. subtilis ,Paenibacillus favisporus )Maize Increase plant biomass, relative water content, water potential of leaf, RAS/RT ratio, and aggregate stability [11] Rhizobium leguminosarum Mesorhizobium ciceri Rizobium phaseoli Wheat Improve growth, biomass, and drought tolerance index [58] Rhizobium strain KYGT207Wheat Improve soil aggregation [48] Bacillus sp.
(B. licheniformis ,B. megaterium ,B. pumilus )Soybean Plant growth promotion [70] Klebsiella sp. IG3Wheat Improve soil aggregation, root adhering soil, and water potential around the roots [75] P. aeruginosa PM389P. aeruginosa ZNP1B.endophyticus J13B. tequilensis J12Increase phytohormones/EPS Enhance fresh weight, dry weight, and plant water content [68] Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6Arabidopsi s thaliana Reduce stomatal opening and wilting [72] B. amyloliquefaciens 54Tomato Increase survival rate, relative water content, and root vigor Decrease concentration of malondialdehyde Increase antioxidant enzyme activities Increase levels of stress-responsive genes ( lea ,tdi65 , andltpg2 )[96] B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42A. thaliana Increase survival rate, fresh and dry shoot weights, and primary root length Increase expression levels of drought defense-related marker genes, such as RD29A, RD17, ERD1 , andLEA14 Increase proline production and activities of superoxide dismutase and peroxidase[66] Pseudomonas fluorescens DR7P. fluorescens DR11Pseudomonas migulae DR35Enterobacter hormaechei DR16Foxtail millet Increase the RAS/RT Improve seed germination [71] P. fluorescens FAP2B. licheniformis B642Wheat Enhance vegetative growth
Enhance photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, transpiration rate (E), internal CO2 concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance (gs), net photosynthetic rate (PN), and leaf water potential (LWP) as compared to uninoculated control[62]
Role of EPS in Mitigation of Salinity Stress in Plants
The problem of increased soil salinity has become a global concern. Some international agencies that have actively participated in data collection regarding soil salinity around the world include the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization – United Nations Environment Programme (UNESCO-UNEP), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and the International Society of Soil Science (ISSS). According to the Soil Map of the World (FAO, 1971-1981), the problem of high soil salinity affects around 953 million hectares (Mha) worldwide. The FAO report on “Status of the World’s Soil Resources” stated that more than a hundred countries worldwide with a total estimated area of about one billion hectares faces the problem of high soil salinity [77].
High soil salinity mainly occurs due to excessive use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, lack of proper drainage systems and improper irrigation practices, and this high salt content in the soil turns out to be extremely damaging for crops [78]. Apart from drought, salinity is another common environmental stressor that adversely impacts plant growth and development and decreases crop yields in affected regions globally [79]. The negative effects on plant growth due to salinity can be attributed to osmotic stress, partial stomatal closure, or nutrient imbalance [80]. Some of these negative effects specifically include decreased energy and lipid metabolism, reduced capacity for chlorophyll content, photosynthesis, decrease in total nitrogen content, and reduced protein synthesis [80]. Salinity also causes oxidative stress in plants causing damage to protein, nucleic acid and lipids peroxidation resulting in loss of membrane integrity [81]. Salt stress-tolerant strains produce EPS in varying compositions and concentrations, enhancing germination and improving crop yields under environmental stress conditions [70, 82]. EPS works as a physical barricade in the soil protecting roots and promoting plant growth under high salinity conditions [72, 83]. EPS production by bacteria in high salinity soil enhances its physicochemical properties and promotes soil aggregate formation [83]. Microbes, especially bacteria, have the ability to impart salt-tolerance to plants and enhance their growth through various mechanisms in saline soil [84]. EPS binds with sodium ions thereby reducing the effects of high soil salinity and EPS produced by microbes mitigates salt stress by maintaining Na+/K+ balance that helps plant to survive under unfavorable soil conditions [85, 86]. EPS-producing salt-tolerant bacteria when inoculated in plants improved the ability of the plants to take up sodium, calcium, and potassium ions from the soil [73, 74]. EPS chelates sodium ions from around the roots thereby preventing the ions from reaching the stem and decreasing sodium absorption from the soil [87]. EPS chelates sodium ions from around the roots thereby preventing the ions from reaching the stem and decreasing sodium absorption from the soil [88]. An increase in salt concentration also stimulates an increase in EPS production which further leads to biofilm production [78, 82, 89] and further enhancement of Na + chelation. NaCl concentration in soil also determines the composition of EPS as increased rhamnose and trehalose were reported by Tewari and Arora [84]. These sugars help microbes to tolerate salt stress by providing carbon source, enhancing water retention.
Researchers have shown that both biofilm formation and EPS production result in several advantages to plants growing in a high salinity environment. They increase cell viability in the rhizosphere region thereby enhancing soil fertility and plant growth [88]. They protect plants from external stress, increase surface area for adhesion, provide high population densities, enhance plant tolerance to antimicrobial agents, and promote nutritional competition between microorganisms [90]. Various strategies adopted by microbes to alleviate salt stress include osmotic balancing, ion transport, and activating oxidative stress defense mechanisms [12, 90-92]. Also, microbes produce various phytohormones, ACC deaminase, siderophores and exopolysaccharides [92]. Studies using the halotolerant strain
Upadhyay
Qurashi and Sabri [82] demonstrated that the EPS-producing salt-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizosphere strains,
In a recent study, EPS-producing
This discussion concludes that bacterial exopolysaccharides ameliorate salinity stress by chelating free Na+ ion, making it available to plants, supporting soil aggregation and stability, enhancing biofilm formation, and contributing to water retention (Table 3). There are several reports on protection of plants in salinity by EPS-producing plant growth-promoting microorganisms, still, more studies are needed about change in physicochemical properties of EPS in saline environment.
-
Table 3 . Applications of EPS-producing salt-tolerant bacteria..
Microorganisms Crops PGP trait References Halmonas variabilis HT1 Planococcus refietoensis RT4Cicera rietinum Increase in fresh weight, dry weight, total soluble sugars and protein contents Increase soil aggregation and biofilm formation [82] Rhizobium meliloti Tomato EPS with high succinoglycan and galactoglucon [67] Bacillus sp., (B. licheniformis ,B. pumilus ,B. coagulans , andB. insolitus )Paenibacillus sp., (P. macerans )Microbacterium sp.Burkholderia cepacia Enterobacter sp.Wheat Rhizospheric soil aggregation Decrease Na+ uptake and root biofilm formation [12] Pseudomonas anguilliseptica SAW 24Faba bean Enhance plant height and fresh/dry weight [81] Rhizobium andPseudomonas Zea Mays Increase proline production Decrease electrolyte leakage along with maintenance of leaf relative water content and uptake of K+ [106] Bacillus isolates andMesorhizobium Cicer arietinum L. (Chickpea)Reduce concentration of Na+ in soil [104] Azotobacter chroococcum Vicia faba L.Enhanced N, P, and K concentrations, the proline content, RWC%, and the K+/Na+ ratio [99] Aeromonas spp. SAL-17 and SAL-21Wheat Increase in leaf proline content, nitrate reductase activity, chlorophyll a/b, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, root length, and shoot length [108] Aeromonas hydrophila/caviae MAS765,Bacillus insolitus MAS17, andBacillus sp. MAS617, MAS620, and MAS820Wheat Restricted passive flow of Na+ from the roots to stele in wheat crop and large root surface covered with soil [107] Marinobacter lipolyticus SM19 andB. subtilis subsp.inaquosorum Wheat Shoot and root dry weight Restricted Na+ uptake [94] [83] Pseudomonas aeruginosa PF07Hellianthus annuus Enhance Root Adhering Soil to Root Tissue ratio (RAS/RT)) and texture of the soil Increase porosity Improve uptake of nutrients [84] Enterobacter sp. MN17 andBacillus sp. MN54Quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa )Improved plant-water relations [105] Rhodopseudomonas palustris TN114 and PP803- Chelate Na +cations from aqueous environment [100]
Role of EPS in Mitigation of Metal Stress in Plants
Soil gets contaminated with heavy metals due to natural phenomena such as soil erosion, volcanic eruptions, weathering of minerals, and forest fires, or by anthropogenic activities such as excessive use of pesticides and chemical fertilizers, smelting, mining, automobile exhaust emissions, leather tanning, municipal waste disposal, textiles dyeing and processing, and manufacturing industrial activities [109]. Heavy metals are toxic in nature because they are non-biodegradable, mutagenic, carcinogenic, and teratogenic, have low bioavailability, and are highly soluble in aqueous environments [110]. The aqueous layer of the soil is a dynamic environment where chemical reactions, and circulation and transfer of heavy metals between bacteria, aqueous layer, and soil layer take place constantly [111]. Heavy metal stress has detrimental effects on plant growth by decreasing chlorophyll contents, blocking gas exchange factors and production of ROS, all of which impose oxidative stress [112].
Plant-associated microorganisms produce EPS and biosurfactants which help in maintaining soil structure and soil fertility in adverse toxic metal conditions [113]. Another study by Mishra
EPS affinity to heavy metals is due to electrostatic interactions which occur between heavy metal ions and surface functional groups of EPS such as hydroxyl and carboxyl. It binds with cationic heavy metals such as Cd2+, Co2+, Pb2+ and Ni2+ resulting in the formation of EPS-metal complexes [16]. Trivalent cations compete with divalent cations to bind with EPS, and trivalent cations form stronger bonds with EPS [114]. Cr (VI)-tolerant plant growth-promoting strain
Cyanobacterial EPS helps in preventing direct contact between these toxic metals and plant cells [117]. Jittaquttipoka
Many bacterial strains like
Gutehan
The
-
Table 4 . EPS-producing bacteria demonstrating metal tolerance..
Microbial Strain Metals Plants Roles of EPS References Cynobacterium synechocystis PCC6803Cadmium, Cobalt - Tolerance to stresses triggered by NaCl, CdSO4, CoCl2, or Fe starvation [117] Pseudomonas sp. W6Lead - Bio-adsorption of lead [118] A. calcoaceticus BS-27P. polymyxa FB-50P. putida BS-19P. fluorescens FB-49Iron, Manganese, lead, Zinc, Copper Acacia Increase root and shoot length, dry biomass, and metal tolerance [119] Bacillus gibsonii PM11Bacillus xiamenensis PM14Iron, Manganese, Cadmium, Zinc, Copper, Chromium Flax ( Linum usitatissimum L.)Enhance plant growth and nutrient availability by minimizing metalinduced stress Enhance phytoextraction of multimetals [116] Bacillus anthracis PM21Cadmium, Chromium Sesbania sesban Enhance seed germination, root and shoot length and photosynthetic pigment [121] Cellulosimicrobium funkei KM032184Chromium Phaseolus vulgaris LRoot Elongation, Shoot elongation, Antioxidant, [115] Halomonas speciesArsenic Avicennia marina Arsenic bioadsprtion, in vitro Na+ ion sequestration and antioxidant activity [120]
Role of EPS in Mitigation of Temperature Stress in Plants
High temperature-induced heat stress causes damage to crop plants, [124] subjecting global crop production to great peril [125]. Global warming could cause an increase in global temperature from 1.6 to 6°C by 2050 FAO [46]. A rise by one degree in temperature will lead to 20% decrease in water resources and this is a major concern for agricultural productivity [126]. Climate change affects plant metabolism, seed germination, and seedling growth, photosynthesis, chloroplast metabolism thereby reducing crop yields [127]. At high temperatures (30-38°C), delay in seed germination can be observed [120]. The reproductive stage of a plant is especially sensitive to high temperatures, and this has been demonstrated in chickpea [128], mungbean [129], sorghum [130], wheat [131], and lentil [132] plants. In tropical and temperate regions, flowering, number of flowers, and number of fruits in a plant are also affected by heat stress. Plant growth-promoting rhizosphere bacteria such as
Nguyena
Another investigation on the role of two bacterial strains,
Heat stress (45oC) affected knockout mutants
-
Table 5 . EPS-producing PGPR imparting tolerance to heat stress..
Microorganisms Crops Roles of EPS References Bacillus cereus Tomato Increase the number of flowers and fruits Increase chlorophyll, proline and antioxidants [135] Bacillus amyloliquefaciens UCMB5113Azospirillum brasilense NO40Wheat Increase HSP26 and chlorophyll content Accumulate GABA and modulate metabolic pathways [140] Pseudomonas sp. AKM-P6Sorghum Enhance tolerance of sorghum seedlings to elevated temperatures [134] Rhizobium sp. (Cajanus )Legume Heat shock protein (Hsp) of 63-74 kDa [29] Pseudomonas sp. PsJNPotato Promote growth [139] Bacillus aryabhattai H26-2 andBacillus siamensis H30-3Chinese cabbage Leaf abscisic acid (ABA) content and reduced stomatal opening after stresses treatments, Biocontrol activity against soft rot [140] Shinorizobium meliloti Medicago sativa Affect symbiosis during heat stress [142] Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA110Soybean Survival in starvation [143]
There are still many mechanisms needing to be explored for abiotic stress responses using plant growth-promoting rhizospheric bacteria and EPS and applied plant growth-promoting microorganism (PGPM) bacterial strains shown to improve crops growing under heat-stressed conditions.
Like high temperature stress, plant productivity is also deteriorated under cold stress. Psychrophiles and psychrotolerant microorganisms colonize permanently cold habitats, such as the polar regions, high altitudes and the deep sea and grow at temperatures ranging from subzero to 15oC. At high-altitude, psychrotolerant microbes sustain and maintain functionality in cold-temperature conditions, while growing optimally at warmer temperatures. Low temperature primarily causes irreversible freezing injury which includes dysfunction of plasma membrane and cellular dehydration [144]. Plant growth-promoting bacteria present within the root zone stimulate the increase in density of root hairs through various phytohormones and hence increase the uptake of water and nutrients. There are investigations reporting on the role of such microorganisms in protecting crops grown at low temperature. Psychrophilic
The above discussion supports that EPS-producing microorganisms are key players in sustaining and increasing the productivity of the existing agro-ecosystem through myriad roles under varied abiotic stress conditions (Fig. 3 Graphical Abstract).
Conclusion and Future Perspective
Agricultural productivity and crop yields can be affected by various environmental stressors such as drought, salinity, high temperatures, and heavy metals, all of which adversely affect plant growth and development, and eventually lead to global food scarcity. Recent investigations have identified several species of bacteria that impart stress tolerance properties to plants through various activities such as EPS production and biofilm formation, which help increase the nutrient uptake and water retention capacity of plants. These PGP bacteria have been extensively studied as bio-inoculants used to promote plant growth and seed germination in regions of heavy environmental stress. They have been demonstrated to possess several PGP traits such as the production of siderophores, IAA, phytohormones and EPS that make plants resistant to environmental stress. Although the review of literature has shown promising results in this area of research, further studies and field trials are needed to characterize the PGP attributes of EPS produced by microorganisms under different stress conditions that are beneficial to plant growth and metabolism. Also, elaborate research is needed on the reciprocal effect of abiotic stress and EPS composition and the physicochemical nature of EPS under such stress conditions. These studies would help to provide tools for alleviating abiotic stress in agricultural crops. The combined use of EPS-producing bacteria offers a promising strategy for multiple abiotic stress management for crop plants. Additionally, bacterial EPS is appropriate for maintaining soil composition, nutrients and fertility to improve plant growth and crop yields.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the authorities of Amity University Uttar Pradesh for providing the opportunity to prepare this review article.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Bacterial EPSs
- Role of EPS in Mitigation of Drought Stress in Plants
- Role of EPS in Mitigation of Salinity Stress in Plants
- Role of EPS in Mitigation of Metal Stress in Plants
- Role of EPS in Mitigation of Temperature Stress in Plants
- Conclusion and Future Perspective
- Acknowledgments
- Conflict of Interest
Fig 1.

Fig 2.

-
Table 1 . EPS-producing bacterial strains in soil aggregation..
Microorganisms Roles of EPS References Microbacterium arborescens Cementing of soil particles [55] Bacillus sp.Soil aggregation [88] Pseudomonas mendocina Promote soil fertility and stabilization [51] Rhizobium sp.Soil aggregation
Increase in water holding capacity of soil in rhizosphere[48] Pseudomonas putida strain GAP-p45Soil aggregation increase root adherence stability Biofilm formation on surface of root of sunflower seedling [52]
-
Table 2 . EPS-producing microbial strains in drought tolerance..
Microorganisms Crops Functions References Rhizobium sp. strain YAS34Sunflower Increase RAS/RT ratio, dry biomass, and nitrogen uptake [24] Pseudomonas mendocina Lactuca sativa L Increase in aggregate stability, water soluble, and total carbohydrates [50] Proteus penneri Pseudomonas aeruginosa Alcaligenes faccalis Maize Improve soil moisture content, leaf area, root length, shoot length, and plant biomass [56] Bacillus sp. (B. amyloliquefaciens ,B. licheniformis ,B. thuringiensis ,B. subtilis ,Paenibacillus favisporus )Maize Increase plant biomass, relative water content, water potential of leaf, RAS/RT ratio, and aggregate stability [11] Rhizobium leguminosarum Mesorhizobium ciceri Rizobium phaseoli Wheat Improve growth, biomass, and drought tolerance index [58] Rhizobium strain KYGT207Wheat Improve soil aggregation [48] Bacillus sp.
(B. licheniformis ,B. megaterium ,B. pumilus )Soybean Plant growth promotion [70] Klebsiella sp. IG3Wheat Improve soil aggregation, root adhering soil, and water potential around the roots [75] P. aeruginosa PM389P. aeruginosa ZNP1B.endophyticus J13B. tequilensis J12Increase phytohormones/EPS Enhance fresh weight, dry weight, and plant water content [68] Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6Arabidopsi s thaliana Reduce stomatal opening and wilting [72] B. amyloliquefaciens 54Tomato Increase survival rate, relative water content, and root vigor Decrease concentration of malondialdehyde Increase antioxidant enzyme activities Increase levels of stress-responsive genes ( lea ,tdi65 , andltpg2 )[96] B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42A. thaliana Increase survival rate, fresh and dry shoot weights, and primary root length Increase expression levels of drought defense-related marker genes, such as RD29A, RD17, ERD1 , andLEA14 Increase proline production and activities of superoxide dismutase and peroxidase[66] Pseudomonas fluorescens DR7P. fluorescens DR11Pseudomonas migulae DR35Enterobacter hormaechei DR16Foxtail millet Increase the RAS/RT Improve seed germination [71] P. fluorescens FAP2B. licheniformis B642Wheat Enhance vegetative growth
Enhance photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, transpiration rate (E), internal CO2 concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance (gs), net photosynthetic rate (PN), and leaf water potential (LWP) as compared to uninoculated control[62]
-
Table 3 . Applications of EPS-producing salt-tolerant bacteria..
Microorganisms Crops PGP trait References Halmonas variabilis HT1 Planococcus refietoensis RT4Cicera rietinum Increase in fresh weight, dry weight, total soluble sugars and protein contents Increase soil aggregation and biofilm formation [82] Rhizobium meliloti Tomato EPS with high succinoglycan and galactoglucon [67] Bacillus sp., (B. licheniformis ,B. pumilus ,B. coagulans , andB. insolitus )Paenibacillus sp., (P. macerans )Microbacterium sp.Burkholderia cepacia Enterobacter sp.Wheat Rhizospheric soil aggregation Decrease Na+ uptake and root biofilm formation [12] Pseudomonas anguilliseptica SAW 24Faba bean Enhance plant height and fresh/dry weight [81] Rhizobium andPseudomonas Zea Mays Increase proline production Decrease electrolyte leakage along with maintenance of leaf relative water content and uptake of K+ [106] Bacillus isolates andMesorhizobium Cicer arietinum L. (Chickpea)Reduce concentration of Na+ in soil [104] Azotobacter chroococcum Vicia faba L.Enhanced N, P, and K concentrations, the proline content, RWC%, and the K+/Na+ ratio [99] Aeromonas spp. SAL-17 and SAL-21Wheat Increase in leaf proline content, nitrate reductase activity, chlorophyll a/b, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, root length, and shoot length [108] Aeromonas hydrophila/caviae MAS765,Bacillus insolitus MAS17, andBacillus sp. MAS617, MAS620, and MAS820Wheat Restricted passive flow of Na+ from the roots to stele in wheat crop and large root surface covered with soil [107] Marinobacter lipolyticus SM19 andB. subtilis subsp.inaquosorum Wheat Shoot and root dry weight Restricted Na+ uptake [94] [83] Pseudomonas aeruginosa PF07Hellianthus annuus Enhance Root Adhering Soil to Root Tissue ratio (RAS/RT)) and texture of the soil Increase porosity Improve uptake of nutrients [84] Enterobacter sp. MN17 andBacillus sp. MN54Quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa )Improved plant-water relations [105] Rhodopseudomonas palustris TN114 and PP803- Chelate Na +cations from aqueous environment [100]
-
Table 4 . EPS-producing bacteria demonstrating metal tolerance..
Microbial Strain Metals Plants Roles of EPS References Cynobacterium synechocystis PCC6803Cadmium, Cobalt - Tolerance to stresses triggered by NaCl, CdSO4, CoCl2, or Fe starvation [117] Pseudomonas sp. W6Lead - Bio-adsorption of lead [118] A. calcoaceticus BS-27P. polymyxa FB-50P. putida BS-19P. fluorescens FB-49Iron, Manganese, lead, Zinc, Copper Acacia Increase root and shoot length, dry biomass, and metal tolerance [119] Bacillus gibsonii PM11Bacillus xiamenensis PM14Iron, Manganese, Cadmium, Zinc, Copper, Chromium Flax ( Linum usitatissimum L.)Enhance plant growth and nutrient availability by minimizing metalinduced stress Enhance phytoextraction of multimetals [116] Bacillus anthracis PM21Cadmium, Chromium Sesbania sesban Enhance seed germination, root and shoot length and photosynthetic pigment [121] Cellulosimicrobium funkei KM032184Chromium Phaseolus vulgaris LRoot Elongation, Shoot elongation, Antioxidant, [115] Halomonas speciesArsenic Avicennia marina Arsenic bioadsprtion, in vitro Na+ ion sequestration and antioxidant activity [120]
-
Table 5 . EPS-producing PGPR imparting tolerance to heat stress..
Microorganisms Crops Roles of EPS References Bacillus cereus Tomato Increase the number of flowers and fruits Increase chlorophyll, proline and antioxidants [135] Bacillus amyloliquefaciens UCMB5113Azospirillum brasilense NO40Wheat Increase HSP26 and chlorophyll content Accumulate GABA and modulate metabolic pathways [140] Pseudomonas sp. AKM-P6Sorghum Enhance tolerance of sorghum seedlings to elevated temperatures [134] Rhizobium sp. (Cajanus )Legume Heat shock protein (Hsp) of 63-74 kDa [29] Pseudomonas sp. PsJNPotato Promote growth [139] Bacillus aryabhattai H26-2 andBacillus siamensis H30-3Chinese cabbage Leaf abscisic acid (ABA) content and reduced stomatal opening after stresses treatments, Biocontrol activity against soft rot [140] Shinorizobium meliloti Medicago sativa Affect symbiosis during heat stress [142] Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA110Soybean Survival in starvation [143]
References
- Raza A, Razzaq A, Mehmood SS, Zou X, Zhang X, Lv Y,
et al . 2019. Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome: a review.Plants (Basel) 30 8 : 34. - Lesk C, Rowhani P, Ramankutty N. 2016. Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production.
Nature 529 : 84-87. - Etesami H, Beattie GA. 2017. Plant-microbe interactions in adaptation of agricultural crops to abiotic stress conditions, pp. 163-200.
In: Probiotics and Plant Health . Springer, Singapore. - Fita A, Rodríguez-Burruezo A, Boscaiu M, Prohens J, Vicente O. 2015. Breeding and domesticating crops adapted to drought and salinity: a new paradigm for increasing food production.
Front. Plant Sci. 6 : 978. - Basu A, Prasad P, Das SN, Kalam S, Sayyed RZ, Reddy MS,
et al . 2021. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) as green bioinoculants: recent developments, constraints, and prospects.Sustainability 13 : 1140. - Bashan Y, de-Bashan LE, Prabhu SR, Hernandez J-P. 2014. Advances in plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculant technology: formulations and practical perspectives (1998-2013).
Plant Soil 378 : 1-33. - Vejan P, Abdullah R, Khadiran T, Ismail S. 2016. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability-A review.
Molecules 21 : 573. - Paulin MM, Novinscak A, Lanteigne C, Gadkar VJ, Filion M. 2017. Interaction between 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol- and hydrogen cyanide-producing
Pseudomonas brassicacearum LBUM300 andClavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis in the tomato rhizosphere.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83 : e00073-17. - Prabhukarthikeyan SR, Keerthana U, Raguchander T. 2018. Antibiotic-producing
Pseudomonas fluorescens mediates rhizome rot disease resistance and promotes plant growth in turmeric plants.Microbiol. Res. 210 : 65-73. - Liu XM, Zhang H. 2015. The effects of bacterial volatile emissions on plant abiotic stress tolerance.
Front. Plant Sci. 6 : 774. - Khan N, Bano A, Rahman MA, Guo J. 2019. Comparative physiological and metabolic analysis reveals a complex mechanism involved in drought tolerance in chickpea (
Cicer arietinum L. ) induced by PGPR and PGRs.Sci. Rep. 9 : 2097. - Upadhyay SK, Singh JS, Saxena AK, Singh DP. 2012. Impact of PGPR inoculation on growth and antioxidant status of wheat under saline conditions.
Plant Biol. 14 : 605-611. - Yadav VK, Raghav M, Sharma SK, Bhagat N. 2020. Rhizobacteriome: promising candidate for conferring drought tolerance in crops.
J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 14 : 73-92. - Boonchai R, Kaewsuk J, Seo G. 2014. Effect of nutrient starvation on nutrient uptake and extracellular polymeric substance for microalgae cultivation and separation.
Desalin. Water Treat. 55 : 360-367. - Ilyas N, Mumtaz K, Akhtar N, Yasmin H, Sayyed RZ, Khan W,
et al . 2020. Exopolysaccharides producing bacteria for the amelioration of drought stress in wheat.Sustainability 12 : 8876. - Sayyed RZ, Patel PR, Shaikh SS. 2015. Plant growth promotion and root colonization by EPS producing
Enterobacter sp. RZS5 under heavy metal contaminated soil.Indian J. Exp. Biol. 53 : 116-123. - Shultana R, Tan Kee Zuan A, Yusop MR, Mohd Saud H, Ayanda AF. 2020. Effect of Salt-tolerant bacterial inoculations on rice seedlings differing in salt-tolerance under saline soil conditions.
Agronomy 10 : 1030. - Shaik, Zulfikar Ali, Vardharajula Sandhya, Minakshi Grover, Venkateswar Rao Linga, Venkateswarlu Bandi. 2011. Effect of inoculation with a thermotolerant plant growth promoting
Pseudomonas putida strain AKMP7 on growth of wheat (Triticum spp.) under heat stress.J. Plant Interact. 4 : 239-246. - Vardharajula S, Ali SZ. 2015. The production of exopolysaccharide by
Pseudomonas putida GAP-P45 under various abiotic stress conditions and its role in soil aggregation.Microbiology 84 : 512-519. - Saha I, Datta S, Biswas D. 2020. Exploring the role of bacterial extracellular polymeric substances for sustainable development in agriculture.
Curr. Microbiol. 77 : 3224-3239. - Mathur P, Roy S. 2021. Insights into the plant responses to drought and decoding the potential of root associated microbiome for inducing drought tolerance.
Physiol. Plant. 172 : 1016-1029. - Roca C, Alves VD, Freitas F, Reis MA. 2015. Exopolysaccharides enriched in rare sugars: bacterial sources, production, and applications.
Front. Microbiol. 6 : 288. - Mishra A, Jha B. 2013. Microbial exopolysaccharides.
In: Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F (eds),The Prokaryotes . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. - Alami Y, Achouak W, Marol C, Heulin T. 2000. Rhizosphere soil aggregation and plant growth promotion of sunflowers by exopolysaccharide producing
Rhizobium sp. strain isolated from sunflower roots.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66 : 33933398.108. - Schmid J, Sieber V, Rehm B. 2015. Bacterial exopolysaccharides: biosynthesis pathways and engineering strategies.
Front. Microbiol. 6 : 496. - Flemming HC, Wingender J. 2001. Relevance of microbial extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs)-parts I: structural and ecological aspects.
Water Sci. Technol. 43 : 1-8. - Czaczyk K, Myszka K. 2007. Biosynthesis of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and its role in microbial biofilm formation.
Polish J. Environ. Stud. 16 : 799-806. - Donot F, Fontana A, Baccou JC, Schorr-Galindo S. 2012. Microbial exopolysaccharides: main examples of synthesis, excretion, genetics and extraction.
Carbohydr. Polym. 87 : 951-962. - Sutherland IW. 2001. Microbial polysaccharides from Gram-negative bacteria.
Int. Dairy J. 11 : 663-674. - Velmourougane K, Prasanna R, Saxena AK. 2017. Agriculturally important microbial biofilms: present status and prospects.
J. Basic Microbiol. 57 : 548-573. - More TT, Yadav JSS, Yan S, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY. 2014. Extracellular polymeric substances of bacteria and their potential environmental applications.
J. Environ. Manage. 144 : 1-25. - Laspidou CS, Rittmann BE. 2002. A unified theory for extracellular polymeric substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass.
Water Res. 36 : 2711-20. - Drogue B, Combes-Meynet E, Moënne-Loccoz Y, Wisniewski-Dyé F, Prigent-Combaret C. 2013. "Control of the cooperation between plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and crops by rhizosphere signals," in Vol. 1 and 2, pp. 281-294.
In: F. J. de Bruijn (ed),Mol. Microb. Ecol. Rhizosphere, ed. . John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NJ, USA. - Prigent-Combaret C. 2013. "Control of the cooperation between plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and crops by rhizosphere signals," in Vol. 1 and 2, pp. 281-294.
In: Molecular Microbial Ecology of the Rhizosphere, ed. . John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NJ, USA. - Smith DL, Gravel V, Yergeau E. 2017. Editorial: signaling in the phytomicrobiome.
Front. Plant Sci. 8 : 611. - Miller MB, Bassler BL. 2001. Quorum sensing in bacteria.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 55 : 165-199. - Waters CM, Bassler BL. 2005. Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria.
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21 : 319-346. - Von Bodman SB, Majerczak DR, Coplin DL. 1998. A negative regulator mediates quorum-sensing control of exopolysaccharide production in
Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 : 7687-7692. - Kalia VC, Gong C, Patel SKS, Lee JK. 2021. Regulation of plant mineral nutrition by signal molecules.
Microorganisms 9 : 774. - Rosier A, Medeiros FHV, Bais HP. 2018. Defining plant growth promoting rhizobacteria molecular and biochemical networks in beneficial plant-microbe interactions.
Plant Soil 428 : 35-55. - Costa OYA, Raaijmakers JM, Kuramae EE. 2018. Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: ecological function and impact on soil aggregation.
Front. Microbiol. 23 : 1636. - Martin JP. 1971 Decomposition and binding action of polysaccharides in soil. Soil Biol.
Biochem. 3 : 33-41. - Hillel D. 1982. Introduction to soil Physics. Academic Press Limited, 24-28 Oval Road, London.
- Sengupta S, Dey S. 2019. Microbial exo-polysaccharides (EPS): role in agriculture and environment.
Agric. Food 1 : 4-8M. - Seleiman MF, Al-Suhaibani N, Ali N, Akmal M, Alotaibi M, Refay Y,
et al . 2021. Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects.Plants 10 : 259. - FAO. 2020. World Food and Agriculture - Statistical Yearbook 2020. Rome.
- Bouskill NJ, Wood TE, Baran R, Ye Z, Bowen BP, Lim H,
et al , , , . 2016b. Below ground response to drought in a tropical forest soil. I. Changes in microbial functional potential and metabolism.Front. Microbiol. 7 : 525. - Kaci Y, Heyraud A, Barakat M, Heulin T. 2005. Isolation and identification of an EPS-producing
Rhizobium strain from arid soil (Algeria): characterization of its EPS and the effect of inoculation on wheat rhizosphere soil structure.Res. Microbiol. 156 : 522-531. - Konnova Svetlana, Brykova O, Sachkova O, Egorenkova I, Ignatov V. 2001. Protective role of the polysaccharide-containing capsular components of
Azospirillum brasilense .Microbiology 70 : 436-440. - Kohler J, Fuensanta C, Roldan A. 2009. Effect of drought on the stability of Rhizosphere soil aggregates of
Lactuca sativa grown in a degraded soil inoculated with PGPR and AM fungi.Appl. Soil Ecol. 42 : 160-165. - Kohler J, Caravaca F, Carrasco L, Roldan A. 2006. Contribution of
Pseudomonas mendocina andGlomus intraradices to aggregate stabilization and promotion of biological fertility in rhizosphere soil of lettuce plants under field conditions.Soil Use Manage. 22 : 298-304. - Sandhya V, Ali SK, Minakshi G, Reddy G, Venkateswarlu B. 2009. Alleviation of drought stress effects in sunflower seedlings by the exopolysaccharides producing
Pseudomonas putida strain GAPP45.Biol. Fertil. Soils 46 : 17-26. - Vardharajula S, Sk ZA. 2014. Exopolysaccharide production by drought tolerant
Bacillus spp. and effect on soil aggregation under drought stress.J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 4 : 51-57. - Sayyed RZ, Jamadar D, Patel PR. 2011. Production of Exopolysaccharide by
Rhizobium sp.Indian J. Microbiol. 51 : 294-300. - Aureen LG, Saroj B. 2009. Sand aggregation by exopolysaccharide producing
Microbacterium arborescens -AGSB.Curr. Microbiol. 58 : 616-621. - Naseem H, Bano A. 2014. Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and their exopolysaccharide in drought tolerance of maize.
J. Plant Interact. 9 : 689-701. - Batool T, Ali S, Seleiman MF, Naveed NH, Ali A, Ahmed K,
et al . 2020. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria alleviates drought stress in potato in response to suppressive oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes activities.Sci. Rep. 10 : 16975. - Hussain MB, Zahir ZA, Asghar HN, Asghar M. 2014. Can catalase and exopolysaccharides producing rhizobia ameliorate drought stress in wheat?
Int. J. Agric. Biol. 16 : 3-13. - Zhang X, Yang Z, Li Z, Zhang F, Hao L. 2020. Effects of drought stress on physiology and antioxidative activity in two varieties of
Cynanchum thesioides .Braz. J. Bot. 43 : 1-10. - Khan N, Bano A. 2019. Exopolysaccharide producing rhizobacteria and their impact on growth and drought tolerance of wheat grown under rainfed conditions.
PLoS One 14 : e0222302. - Yadav J, Verma JP, Tiwari KN. 2010. Effect of plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria on seed germination and plant growth Chickpea (
Cicer arietinum L) under in vitro condition Biological Forum.Int. J. 2 : 15-18. - Ansari FA, Ahmad I. 2019. Fluorescent pseudomonas-FAP2 and
Bacillus licheniformis interact positively in biofilm mode enhancing plant growth and photosynthetic attributes.Sci. Rep. 9 : 4547. - Ali SZ, Sandhya V, Venkateswar Rao L. 2014. Isolation and characterization of drought-tolerant ACC deaminase and exopolysaccharide-producing fluorescent
Pseudomonas sp.Ann. Microbiol. 64 : 493-502. - Lim JH, Kim SD. 2013. Induction of drought stress resistance by multi-functional PGPR
Bacillus licheniformis K11 in pepper.Plant Pathol. J. 29 : 201-208. - Khan N, Bano A, Curá JA. 2020. Role of beneficial microorganisms and salicylic acid in improving rainfed agriculture and future food safety.
Microorganisms 8 : 1018. - Lu X, Liu SF, Yue L, Zhao X, Zhang Y-B, Xie Z-K,
et al . 2018. Epsc involved in the encoding of exopolysaccharides produced byBacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 act to boost the drought tolerance ofArabidopsis thaliana .Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19 : 3795. - Wang DC, Jiang CH, Zhang LN, Chen L, Zhang XY, Guo JH. 2019. Biofilms positively contribute to
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 54-induced drought tolerance in tomato plants.Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 : 6271. - Ghosh D, Gupta A, Mohapatra S. 2019. A comparative analysis of exopolysaccharide and phytohormone secretions by four drought-tolerant rhizobacterial strains and their impact on osmotic-stress mitigation in
Arabidopsis thaliana .World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 35 : 90. - Igiehon NO, Babalola OO, Aremu BR. 2019. Genomic insights into plant growth promoting rhizobia capable of enhancing soybean germination under drought stress.
BMC Microbiol. 19 : 159. - Susilowati A, Puspita AA, Yunus A. 2018. Drought resistant of bacteria producing exopolysaccharide and IAA in rhizosphere of soybean plant (Glycine max) in Wonogiri Regency Central Java Indonesia. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 142 (2018) 012058.
- Niu X, Song L, Xiao Y, Ge W. 2018. Drought-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria associated with foxtail millet in a semiarid agroecosystem and their potential in alleviating drought stress.
Front. Microbiol. 8 : 2580. - Cho SM, Anderson AJ, Kim YC. 2018. Extracellular polymeric substances of
Pseudomonas chlororaphis 06 induce systemic drought tolerance in plants.Res. Plant Dis. 24 : 242-247. - Vardharajula S, Ali Sk Z. 2014. Exopolysaccharide production by drought tolerant
Bacillus spp. and effect on soil aggregation under drought stress.J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 4 : 51-57. - Timmusk S, Abd El-Daim IA, Copolovici L, Tanilas T, Kännaste A, Behers L,
et al . 2014. Drought-tolerance of wheat improved by rhizosphere bacteria from harsh environments: enhanced biomass production and reduced emissions of stress volatiles.PLoS One 9 : e96086. - Gontia-Mishra I, Sapre S, Sharma A, Tiwari S. 2016. Amelioration of drought tolerance in wheat by the interaction of plantgrowthpromoting rhizobacteria.
Plant Biol. 18 : 992-1000. - Camaille M, Fabre N, Clément C, Ait Barka E. 2021. Advances in wheat physiology in response to drought and the role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to trigger drought tolerance.
Microorganisms 9 : 687. - FAO, ITPS, GSBI, CBD, EC. 2020. State of knowledge of soil biodiversity - Status, challenges and potentialities, Report 2020. FAO, Rome.
- Deng J, Orner EP, Chau JF, Anderson EM, Kadilak AL, Rubinstein RL,
et al . 2015. Synergistic effects of soil microstructure and bacterial EPS on drying rate in emulated soil micromodels.Soil Biol. Biochem. 83 : 116-124. - Ma Y, Dias MC, Freitas H. 2020. Drought and salinity stress responses and microbe-induced tolerance in plants.
Front. Plant Sci. 11 : 591911. - Parida SK, Das AB. 2005. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants.
Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 60 : 324-349. - Gupta B, Huang B. 2014. Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization.
Int. J. Genomics 2014 : 701596. - Qurashi AW, Sabri AN. 2012a. Bacterial exopolysaccharide and biofilm formation stimulate chickpea growth and soil aggregation under salt stress.
Braz. J. Microbiol. 43 : 1183-1191. - Minah B, Hazarin Subair F. 2015. Isolation and Screening bacterial exopolysaccharide (EPS) from potato rhizosphere in highland and the potential as a producer indole acetic acid (IAA).
Procedia Food Sci. 3 : 74-81. - Tewari S, Arora NK. 2014a. Multifunctional exopolysaccharides from
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PF23 involved in plant growth stimulation, biocontrol and stress amelioration in sunflower under saline conditions.Curr. Microbiol. 69 : 484-494. - Singh RP, Jha PN. 2016. A halotolerant bacterium
Bacillus licheniformis HSW-16 augments induced systemic tolerance to salt stress in wheat plant (Triticum aestivum ).Front. Plant Sci. 7 : 1890. - 2013. Isolation, screening and optimization of exopolysaccharide producing bacterium from saline soil.
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Res. 3 : 24-31. - Choudhary DK, Kasotia A, Jain S, Vaishnav A, Kumari S, Sharma KP,
et al . 2015. Bacterial-mediated tolerance and resistance to plants under abiotic and biotic stress.J. Plant Growth Regul. 35 : 276-300. - Ashraf M, Berge SH, Mahmood OT. 2004. Inoculating wheat seedling with exopolysaccharides-producing bacteria restrict sodium uptake and stimulates plant growth under salt stress.
Biol. Fertil Soils 40 : 157-162. - Arora M, Kaushik A, Rani N, Kaushik CP. 2010. Effect of cyanobacterial exopolysaccharides on salt stress alleviation and seed germination.
J. Environ. Biol. 31 : 701-704. - Ha-Tran DM, Nguyen TTM, Hung SH, Huang E, Huang CC. 2021. Roles of plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) in stimulating salinity stress defense in plants: a review.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 : 3154. - Yasmeen T, Ahmad A, Arif MS, Mubin M, Rehman K, Shahzad SM,
et al . 2020. Biofilm forming rhizobacteria enhance growth and salt tolerance in sunflower plants by stimulating antioxidant enzymes activity.Plant Physiol. Biochem. 156 : 242-256. - Bhat MA, Kumar V, Bhat MA, Wani IA, Dar FL, Farooq I,
et al . 2020. Mechanistic Insights of the interaction of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) with plant roots toward enhancing plant productivity by alleviating salinity stress.Front. Microbiol. 20 : 1952. - Lloret J, Wulff BB, Rubio JM, Downie JA, Bonilla I, Rivilla R. 1998. Exopolysaccharide II production is regulated by salt in the halotolerant strain
Rhizobium meliloti EFB1.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64 : 1024-1028. - Atouei MT, Pourbabaee AA, Shorafa M. 2019. Alleviation of salinity stress on some growth parameters of wheat by exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria.
Ir. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A. 43 : 2725-2733. - Chu TN, Tran BTH, Van Bui L, Hoang MTT. 2019. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium
Pseudomonas PS01 induces salt tolerance inArabidopsis thaliana .BMC Res. Notes 12 : 11. - Wang J, Song L, Gong X, Xu J, Li M. 2020. Functions of jasmonic acid in plant regulation and response to abiotic stress.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 : 1446. - Sultana S, Paul SC, Parveen S, Alam S, Rahman N, Jannat B,
et al . 2020. Isolation and identification of salt-tolerant plant-growthpromoting rhizobacteria and their application for rice cultivation under salt stress.Can. J. Microbiol. 66 : 144-160. - Liu X, Luo Y, Li Z, Wang J, Wei G. 2017. Role of exopolysaccharide in salt stress resistance and cell motility of
Mesorhizobium alhagi CCNWXJ12-2T.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 101 : 2967-2978. - Abd El-Ghany, Mona FA Attia, Magdy. 2020. Effect of exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria and melatonin on faba bean production in saline and non-saline soil agronomy
10 : 316. - Nunkaew T, Kantachote D, Nitoda T, Kanzaki H, Ritchie RJ. 2015. Characterization of exopolymeric substances from selected
Rhodopseudomonas palustris strains and their ability to adsorb sodium ions.Carbohydr. Polym. 22 : 115: 334-41. - Amna Xia Y, Farooq MA, Javed MT, Kamran MA, Mukhtar T, Ali J,
et al . 2020. Multi-stress tolerant PGPRBacillus xiamenensis PM14 activating sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) red rot disease resistance.Plant Physiol. Biochem. 151 : 1640-1649. - Oosten V, Stasio MJ, Cirillo ED, Silletti V, Ventorino S, Pepe V, Raimondi O, Maggio GA. 2018. Root inoculation with
Azotobacter chroococcum 76A enhances tomato plants adaptation to salt stress under low N conditions.BMC Plant Biol. 18 : 205. - Mohammad AF. 2018. Effectiveness of exopolysaccharides and biofilm forming plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on salinity tolerance of faba bean (
Vicia faba L.).Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 12 : 399-404. - Kumari P, Khanna V. 2015. ACC-deaminase and EPS production by salt tolerant rhizobacteria augment growth in chickpea under salinity stress.
Int. J. Bio-resource Stress Manage. 6 : 558-565. - Yang A, Akhtar SS, Iqbal S, Amjad M, Naveed M, Zahir ZA,
et al . 2016. Enhancing salt tolerance in quinoa by halotolerant bacterial inoculation.Funct. Plant Biol. 43 : 632-642. - Bano A, Fatima M. 2009. Salt tolerance in
Zea mays (L). following inoculation withRhizobium andPseudomonas .Biol. Fertil. Soils 45 : 405-413. - Ashraf M, Ahmad MSA, Ozturk M, Aksoy A. 2012. Crop improvement through different means, pp. 1-15.
In: Ashraf,et al (ed),Crop Production for Agricultural Improvement . Springer. - Nawaz MS, Arshad A, Rajput L, Fatima K, Ullah S, Ahmad M,
et al . 2020. Growth-stimulatory effect of quorum sensing signal moleculeN -Acyl-Homoserine lactone-producing multi-traitAeromonas spp. on wheat genotypes under salt stress.Front. Microbiol. 29 : 11:553621. - Chibuike GU, Obiora SC. 2014. Heavy metal polluted soils: effect on plants and bioremediation methods.
Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2014 : 1-12. - Adrees M, Ali S, Rizwan M, Zia-Ur-Rehman M, Ibrahim M, Abbas F,
et al . 2015. Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of heavy metal toxicity in plants: a review.Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 119 : 186-97. - Violante A, Cozzolino V, Perelomov L, Caporale AG, Pigna M. 2010. Mobility and bioavailability of heavy metals and metalloids in soil environments.
J. Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr. 10 : 268-292. - Mishra J, Singh R, Arora N K. 2017. Alleviation of heavy metal stress in plants and remediation of soil by rhizosphere microorganisms.
Front. Microbiol. 8 : 1706. - Ayangbenro AS, Babalola OO. 2017. A New strategy for heavy metal polluted environments: a review of microbial biosorbents.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14 : 94. - Dobrowolski R, Szcześ A, Czemierska M, Jarosz-Wikołazka A. 2017. Studies of cadmium (II), lead (II), nickel (II), cobalt (II) and chromium (VI) sorption on extracellular polymeric substances produced by Rhodococcus opacus and
Rhodococcus rhodochrous .Bioresour. Technol. 225 : 113-120. - Karthik C, Elangovan N, Kumar TS, Govindharaju S, Barathi S, Oves M,
et al . 2017. Characterization of multifarious plant growth promoting traits of rhizobacterial strain AR6 under Chromium (VI) stress.Microbiol. Res. 204 : 65-71. - Zainab N, Bashir Ud Din A, Muhammad Tariq Javed M, Siddique Afridi M, Tehmeena Mukhtar, Kamran Muhammad Aqeel,
et al . 2020. Deciphering metal toxicity responses of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) with exopolysaccharide and ACC-deaminase producing bacteria in industrially contaminated soils.Plant Physiol. Biochem. 152 : 90-99. - Jittawuttipoka T, Planchon M, Spalla O, Benzerara K, Guyot F, Cassier-Chauvat C,
et al . 2013. Multidisciplinary evidences that synechocystis PCC6803 exopolysaccharides operate in cell sedimentation and protection against salt and metal stresses.PLoS One 8 : e55564. - Kalita D, Joshi SR. 2017. Study on bioremediation of Lead by exopolysaccharide producing metallophilic bacterium isolated from extreme habitat.
Biotechnol. Rep. 16 : 48-57. - Getahun A, Muleta D, Assefa F, Kiros S. 2020. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolated from degraded habitat enhance drought tolerance of acacia (
Acacia abyssinica Hochst .ex Benth.) seedlings.Int. J. Microbiol. 2020 : 8897998. - Mukherjee P, Mitra A, Roy M. 2019.
Halomonas Rhizobacteria ofAvicennia marina of indian sundarbans promote rice growth under saline and heavy metal stresses through exopolysaccharide production.Front. Microbiol. 10 : 1207. - Ali J, Ali F, Ahmad I, Rafique M, Munis MFH, Hassan SW,
et al . 2020. Mechanistic elucidation of germination potential and growth of Sesbania sesban seedlings withBacillus anthracis PM21 under heavy metals stress: an in vitro study.Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 208 : 111769. - Thijs S, Sillen W, Weyens N, Vangronsveld J. 2017. Phytoremediation: 2017. State-of-the-art and a key role for the plant microbiome in future trends and research prospects.
Int. J. Phytoremed. 19 : 23-38. - Mosa KA, Saadoun I, Kumar K, Helmy M, Dhankher OP. 2016. Potential biotechnological strategies for the clean up of heavy metals and metalloids Front.
Plant Sci. 7 : 303. - Teixeira EI, Fischer G, Velthuizen HV, Walter C, Ewert F. 2013. Global hot spots of heat stress on agricultural crops due to climate change.
Agric. Meteorol. 170 : 206-215. - FAO. 2017. Water Scarcity - One of the greatest challenges of our time. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- Fahad S, Bajwa AA, Nazir U, Anjum SA, Farooq A, Zohaib A,
et al . 2017. Crop production under drought and heat stress: plant responses and management options.Front. Plant Sci. 8 : 1147. - Kumar S, Thakur P, Kaushal N, Malik J, A Gaur P, Nayyar H. 2013. Effect of varying high temperatures during reproductive growth on reproductive function, oxidative stress and seed yield in chickpea genotypes differinginheat sensitivity.
Arch. Agronomy Soil Sci. 59 : 823-843. - Devasirvatham V, Gaur PM, Mallikarjuna N, Tokachichu RN, Trethowan RM, Tan DK. 2012. Effect of high temperature on the reproductive development of chickpea genotypes under controlled environments.
Funct. Plant Biol. 39 : 1009-1018. - Kaur R, Bains TS, Bindumadhava H, Nayyar H. 2015. Responses of mungbean (
Vigna radiata L.) genotypes to heat stress: effects on reproductive biology, leaf function and yield traits.Sci. Hortic. 197 : 527-541. - Prasad PV V, Djanaguiraman M, Perumal R, Ciampitti IA. 2015. Impact of high temperature stress on floret fertility and individual grain weight of grain sorghum: sensitive stages and thresholds for temperature and duration.
Front. Plant Sci. 6 : 1-11. - Farooq M, Bramley H, Palta JA, Siddique KHM. 2011. Heat stress in wheat during reproductive and grain-filling phases.
CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 30 : 491-507. - Sita K, Sehgal A, Kumar J, Kumar S, Singh S, Siddique KH,
et al . 2017. Identification of high-temperature tolerant lentil (Lens culinaris Medik. ) genotypes through leaf and pollen traits.Front. Plant Sci. 8 : 1-26. - Bramhachari PV, Nagaraju GP, Kariali E. 2018. Current perspectives on rhizobacterial-EPS interactions in alleviation of stress responses: novel strategies for sustainable agricultural productivity. In Role of Rhizospheric Microbes in Soil.
Springer: Singapore. 2018 : 33-55. - Ali SZ, Sandhya V, Grover M, Linga VR, Bandi V. 2011. Effect of inoculation with a thermo-tolerant plant growth promoting
Pseudomonas putida strain AKMP7 on growth of wheat (Triticum spp.) under heat stress.J. Plant. Interact. 6 : 239-246. - Mukhtar T, Rehman S, Smith D, Sultan T, Seleiman M, Alsadon A,
et al . 2020. Mitigation of heat stress inSolanum lycopersicum L. by ACC-deaminase and exopolysaccharide. ProducingBacillus cereus : effects on biochemical profiling.Sustainability 12 : 2159. - Parsell DA, Lindquist S. 1993. The function of heat shock proteins in stress tolerance: degradation and reactivation of damaged proteins.
Annu. Rev. Genet. 27 : 437-496. - Nandal K, Sehrawat AR, Yadav AS, Vashishat RK, Boora KS. 2005. High temperature-induced changes in exopolysaccharides, lipopolysaccharides, and protein profile of heat-resistant mutants of
Rhizobium sp. (Cajanus).Microbiol. Res. 160 : 367-373. - Nguyena HT, Razafindralambo H, Blecker C, N'Yapoa C, Thonart P, Delvignea F. 2014. Stochastic exposure to sub-lethal high temperature enhances exopolysaccharides (EPS) excretion and improves
Bifidobacterium bifidum cell survival to freeze-drying.Biochem. Eng. J. 88 : 85-94. - Bensalim S, Nowak J, Asiedu SK. 1998. A plant growth promoting rhizobacterium and temperature effects on performance of 18 clones of potato.
Am. J. Pot. Res. 75 : 145-152. - Abd El-Daim IA, Bejai S, Fridborg I, Meijer J. 2018. Identifying potential molecular factors involved in
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 5113 mediated abiotic stress tolerance in wheat.Plant Biol. 20 : 271-279. - Shin DJ, Yoo SJ, Hong JK, Weon HY, Song J, Sang MK. 2019. Effect of
Bacillus aryabhattai H26-2 andB. siamensis H30-3 on Growth promotion and alleviation of heat and drought stresses in Chinese cabbage.Plant Pathol. J. 35 : 178-187. - Ogden AJ, McAleer JM, Kahn ML. 2019. Characterization of the
Sinorhizobium meliloti HslUV and ClpXP protease systems in freeliving and symbiotic states.J. Bacteriol. 201 : e00498-18. - Nishihata S, Kondo T, Tanaka K,
et al . 2018.Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA110 PhaR functions for pleiotropic regulation of cellular processes besides PHB accumulation.BMC Microbiol. 18 : 156. - Mishra PK, Bisht SC, Ruwari P, Selvakumar G, Joshi GK, Bisht JK,
et al . 2018. Alleviation of cold stress in inoculated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings with psychrotolerantPseudomonads from NW Himalayas.Arch Microbiol. 193 : 497-513. - Zubair M, Hanif A, Farzand A, Sheikh T, Suleman M, Khan AR,
et al . 2019. Genetic screening and expression analysis of psychrophilicBacillus spp. reveal their potential to alleviate cold stress and modulate phytohormones in wheat.Microorganisms 7 : 337. - Ait Barka E, Nowak J, Clément C. 2006. Enhancement of chilling resistance of inoculated grapevine plantlets with a plant growth promoting
Rhizobacterium ,Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72 : 7246-7252. - Fernandez O, Theocharis A, Bordiec S, Feil R, Jacquens L, Clément C,
et al . 2012.Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN acclimates grapevine to cold by modulating carbohydrate metabolism.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 25 : 496-504. - Wang C, Wang C, Gao YL, Wang Y-P, Guo J-H. 2016. A Consortium of three plant growth-promoting
Rhizobacterium strains acclimatesLycopersicon esculentum and confers a better tolerance to chilling stress.J. Plant Growth Regul. 35 : 54-64. - Abd El-Daim IA, Bejai S, Meijer J. 2019.
Bacillus velezensis 5113 Induced metabolic and molecular reprogramming during abiotic stress tolerance in wheat.Sci. Rep. 9 : 16282.