Articles Service
Research article
Genomics and LC-MS Reveal Diverse Active Secondary Metabolites in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens WS-8
1College of life science, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, P.R.China, 2Institute of Biology, Hebei Academy of Science, Shijiazhuang 050081, P.R.China, 3Main Crops Disease of Microbial Control Engineering Technology Research Center in Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050081, P.R.China, 4Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, P.R.China
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020; 30(3): 417-426
Published March 28, 2020 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1906.06055
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
Pathogenic microorganisms affecting plant health are a major and chronic threat to food production and ecosystem stability all over the world [1]. At present, chemical control is the main approach to control plant diseases [2]. However, the long-term use of chemical fungicides has resulted in serious and multiple resistance of pathogenic microorganisms. At the same time, pesticide residues have polluted the environment, endangered human health, and destroyed the ecological balance. Biological control has attracted more and more attention and played an increasingly important role in the world because of its advantages to the environment, ecology, and human health.
The whole genome of
Fengycin, iturin, surfactin [7], difficidin, bacilysin [8], and macrolactin [9] are among the main antifungal peptides synthesized by the non-ribosomal pathway of
-
Fig. 1. The chemical structure of fengycins (
A ), iturins (B ), surfactins (C ).
Although many strains have been used to control plant diseases, more efficient strains are still needed in agriculture. Before the use of a new strain as a biocontrol agent, it is recommendable to identify its main active substances.
Materials and Methods
Microorganisms and Culture Conditions
DNA Isolation, Genome Sequencing and Assembly
Genomic DNA of
Gene Prediction and Identification of Secondary Metabolite Clusters
Gene prediction was performed on the WS-8 genome assembly by GeneMarkS [14] with an integrated model which combines the GeneMarkS generated (native) and heuristic model parameters. Gene annotation was added by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline [15]. The genome comparison was carried out by RAST version 2.0 [16]. Genes potentially involved in the biosynthesis of antibiotics and secondary metabolites were identified using antiSMASH3.0 [17]. Genome overview was created by CGView Server to show the annotation information of WS-8 [18].
Transcriptomic Analysis Using RNA-Seq
For RNA extraction, cells were cultivated for 32 h and harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 ×
Raw data (raw reads, fastq files) were first processed using in-house Perl scripts from Beijing Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. In this step, clean data (clean reads) were obtained by removing reads containing adapters, reads containing poly-N tails, and low-quality reads from the raw data. Q20, Q30, and GC content of the clean data were calculated. All of the downstream analyses were based on the high-quality clean data. The remaining clear reads were mapped to the reference genome of WS-8 using Bowtie2 software based on the local alignment algorithm [19]. HTSeq v0.6.1 was used to count the reads mapped to each gene. The fragments per kilobase of transcripts per million mapped reads (FPKM) of each gene was calculated based on the length of the gene and read count mapped to this gene [20]. The transcriptomic data of
Purification of Anti-Gray-Mold Compounds
The strain WS-8 was grown in nutrient broth (NB) at 32°C for 32 h. After centrifugation (10,000 rpm, 30 min, and 4°C), cells were removed and the cell-free supernatant (4 liters) was shaken with 200 g of Amberlite XAD-7HP (Sigma, USA) for 12 h at 18°C. The antimicrobial crude extract (CE) was obtained following the protocol of Xin [21]. Further purification was carried out by HPLC (SHIMADZU LC-20A, Japan) with a C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm; WONDASIL, Japan) at room temperature. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile and HPLC-grade water (with 0.1%trifluoroacetic acid [TFA]). A linear gradient was used for elution at a flow rate of 1 ml/min as follows: 0-60 min, from 10% to 80%acetonitrile (linear gradient); 60-65 min, from 80% to 90% acetonitrile (linear gradient); 65-75 min, 90% acetonitrile (isocratic); 75-80 min, from 90% to 10% acetonitrile (linear gradient); 80-90 min, 10%acetonitrile (isocratic). Elution was monitored by determining absorbance at 214 nm, and fractions were manually collected each minute. Using the agar well diffusion method [22, 23], fractions with anti-gray-mold (
LC-MS/MS Analysis
Liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was performed by the Thermo Fisher UltiMate 3000 UPLC/Q-Exactive Orbitrap MS system. The UHPLC conditions were as follows: Thermo GOLD HYPERSIL column (C18, 50 × 2.1 mm, 1.9 µm; Thermo), eluent A was H2O/0.1% formic acid, eluent B was CH3OH/0.1% formic acid, flow rate was 300 µl/min, elution gradient was 70%A/30%B to 10%A/90%B, 20 min. The MS operating conditions were as follows: the temperature was 300°C, a sheath gas rate of 35 l/min, auxiliary gas rate of 35 l/min, electrospray voltage of 3.0 kV for positive full scan mode, and an
Results
General Genome Features of B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8
A total of 90,776 reads, with approximately 311-fold coverage (approximately 1.227 G), were obtained. Compared to the type strain
-
Table 1 . General genome features of
B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8.Feature Value Genome size (bp) 3929787 GC content [%] 45.6 Predicted genes 3895 Protein coding genes (CDSs) 3777 Pseudo genes 107 tRNA genes 86 rRNA genes 27 ncRNAs genes 5
-
Fig. 2. Circular genome map of
B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8. The circular map consists of 5 circles. From the outermost circle inwards, circle (1) and circle (2) show the coding gene distributions in the forward strand and the backward strand, respectively, including tRNA (brown), rRNA (pink), and other (gray); and circle (3) shows GC content; circle (4) and circle (5) show GC skew+ and GC skew-, respectively.
Using RAST version 2.0 under the Compare Metabolic Reconstruction model, a total of 2,428 functioning parts genes were found, 170 and 108 unique genes were identified from
Functional Gene Annotation
-
Fig. 3. COG categories of
B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8.
-
Table 2 . Secondary metabolite clusters in
B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8 identified by antiSMASH 3.0.Cluster Type From To Most similar known biosynthetic gene cluster (percent of similarity) MIBiG BGC-ID 1 Polyketide 106469 206922 Difficidin (93% ) BGC0000176_c1 2 Polyketide 321899 363008 NA NA 3 Terpene 426326 448209 NA NA 4 Nonribosomal peptide 473436 611237 Fengycin (93%) BGC0001095_c1 5 Nonribosomal peptide 675868 778542 Bacillaene (92%) BGC0001089_c1 6 Polyketide 1004652 1090557 Macrolactin (90%) BGC0000181_c1 7 Lantipeptide 1259447 1288335 NA NA 8 Terpene 1408827 1429567 NA NA 9 Polyketide 1511611 1552855 Butirosin (7%) BGC0000693_c1 10 Microcin 1609461 1629609 NA NA 11 Microcin 1878888 1899036 NA NA 12 Nonribosomal peptide 2089305 2154712 Surfactin (78%) BGC0000433_c1 13 Microcin 2298675 2324765 NA NA 14 Microcin 2369207 2395180 NA NA 15 Microcin 2435066 2455214 NA NA 16 Microcin 2456802 2476950 NA NA 17 Other 2776305 2817723 Bacilysin (85%) BGC0001184_c1 18 Nonribosomal peptide 3354032 3405823 Bacillibactin (92%) BGC0000309_c1 19 Microcin 3470058 3490206 NA NA
Transcriptome Analysis of Secondary Metabolite Clusters
The transcriptome of stationary phase of the strain WS-8 was sequenced with the HiSeq4000 sequencing platform. A total of 9,006,772 clean Reads and 1.35 G clean data were obtained. The Q20 and Q30 of clean data were 98.07% and 94.69%, respectively. The GC content of the transcriptome was 48.08%. About 97.97% of the clean reads were mapped to the WS-8 genome. Using the annotation of antiSMASH for mapping and FPKM values to indicate the expression levels, the mapped genes were classified into four groups (Table 3). Using a threshold of FPKM > 1 to define potential gene expression [29], 3,540 expressed genes were sequenced. As shown in Table 3, more than 93% of the genes were expressed in the stationary phase. Most genes were expressed at a medium level, and more than 13% of the genes were expressed at a high level. In addition, there were 277 non-expressed genes.
-
Table 3 . Transcriptomic features of
B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8.FPKM Interval Gene counts Percentage 0~1 277 60.2% 1~10 0 0.00% 10~500 3,045 80.83% >500 495 13.14% The transcripts were assessed based on FPKM values: high expression (FPKM ≥ 500), medium expression (10 ≤ FPKM< 500), low expression (1 ≤ FPKM < 10), and no expression (FPKM < 1).
Using the FPKM value, the expression levels of core genes in gene clusters related to antibacterial substances were analyzed. We found that core genes of six gene clusters, which are homologous to bacillibactin, fengycin, bacillaene, difficidin, macrolactin, and surfactin biosynthetic gene cluster were all expressed (Fig. 4). All of the bacillibactin genes (bsuF, bsuB, bsuE, and bsuA), fengycin genes (fenA, fenB, fenC, fenD, and fenE), bacillaene genes (
-
Fig. 4. FPKM values of core genes of different gene clusters.
Purification and UPLC-MS Analysis of Antibacterial Substances from WS-8
The antimicrobial compounds were enriched by Amberlite XAD-7HP from the cell-free supernatant and isolated by HPLC. Using gray mold as indicator bacteria, we tested all of the HPLC fractions. We found 25 fractions with anti-gray-mold activity. The Thermo Fisher UltiMate 3000 UPLC/Q-Exactive Orbitrap MS system was employed to analyze the above 25 fractions, and we found many fractions containing the same compound. Ten of these fractions (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, and j) containing non-repeating substances for further analysis were chosen, and 21 compounds showing anti-gray-mold activity were identified (Fig. 5).
-
Fig. 5. UPLC and anti-gray-mold activity analysis of the 10 fractions from
B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8.
Using MS to elucidate the exact molecular weight of these 21 compounds, we identified 14 lipopeptides belonging to two main types: iturin and fengycin (Table 4). Many of the components have similar charge-to-mass ratios (
-
Table 4 . The
m/z value of active substance detected by Q-Exactive Orbitrap MS.Fraction no. Compound no. m/z m/z Characteristic fragment ions Retention time (min) Identification [M+H]+ [M+Na]+ a 1 1043.5474 1065.5284 - 3.66 C14Iturin A 2 1044.5328 1066.5145 - 3.82 C14 Iturin B 3 1044.5334 1066.5149 - 4.44 C14 Iturin B 4 1057.5643 1079.5454 - 4.53 C15Iturin A 5 1057.5636 1079.5449 - 4.67 C15Iturin A b 6 1435.766 1457.7474 540.77 7.38 C14 Fengycin A c 7 1449.7848 1471.7635 540.77 7.99 C15 Fengycin A d 8 1463.7975 1485.7784 554.79 7.96 C14Fengycin B 9 1449.7836 1471.7632 540.77 8.18 C15 Fengycin A e 10 1449.7816 1471.7626 540.77 8.45 C15 Fengycin A f 11 1477.8138 1499.7944 554.79 8.52 C15 Fengycin B 12 1463.7969 1485.7777 540.77 8.72 C16 Fengycin A 13 1463.7974 1485.7789 540.77 8.91 C16 Fengycin A g 14 1477.8138 1499.7888 540.77 9.08 C17 Fengycin A 15 1477.814 1499.7932 540.77 9.3 C17 Fengycin A 16 1477.8157 1499.7963 540.77 9.42 C17 Fengycin A h 17 1491.8285 1513.8091 554.79 9.4 C16 Fengycin B i 18 1505.8439 1527.825 554.79 9.86 C17 Fengycin B 19 1447.8036 1469.7852 540.77 10.18 C15:1 Fengycin A j 20 1461.8197 1483.8 540.77 10.55 C16:1 Fengycin A 21 1475.8328 1497.8135 554.79 10.66 C15:1 Fengycin B
The remaining 16 compounds were identified as fengycins. Fengycin A and fengycin B are different in their sixth amino acids of cyclic octapeptide (Ala and Val respectively). So, in the process of mass spectrometry, the daughter ion of MS peaks are different. Therefore, ion fragments (
Compounds 6, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21 have unique
Besides, three compounds (7, 9, and 10), with an
Compounds 8, 12, and 13 have similar molecular ion peaks (
The last four compounds (11, 14, 15, and 16) show a similar molecular ion peak of the protonated [M+H]+ fragment at 1477.81, but their characteristic fraction ions (Fig. S7) are also different. Compound 11, containing doubly charged fragment ions of
Discussion
Plant disease has always been an important problem in agriculture.
Ten fractions (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, and k) containing 21 compounds with strong anti-gray-mold activity were fractionated from the cell-free supernatants of
Surfactin does not have antifungal activity, but it can enhance the antifungal activity of other lipopeptide, especially iturin [36, 37]. In this research, although core genes of surfactin biosynthesis cluster were under high expression level, but no surfatin was detected. Because of no anti-graymold activity, the fractions containing surfactin probably were abandoned after the active test.
In conclusion, the genome of
Supplemental Materials
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by grants from the Science and technology planning project of Hebei academy of sciences (19304), High-level talents funding projects of Hebei province (B2018003019), and High-level talents training and funding projects of Hebei academy of sciences (2018G01). We thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
References
- Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Clement C, Barka EA. 2005. Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71 : 4951-4959. - Hirooka T, Ishii H. 2013. Chemical control of plant diseases.
J. General Plant Pathol. 79 : 390-401. - Fickers P. 2012. Antibiotic compounds from Bacillus: Why are they so Amazing?
Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 8 : 38-43. - Johnson BA, Anker H, Meleney FL. 1945. Bacitracin: A New antibiotic produced by a member of the
B. Subtilis Group.Science 102 : 376-377. - Chen XH, Koumoutsi A, Scholz R, Eisenreich A, Schneider K, Heinemeyer I,
et al . 2007. Comparative analysis of the complete genome sequence of the plant growth-promoting bacteriumBacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42.Nat. Biotechnol. 25 : 1007-1014. - Belbahri L, Chenari Bouket A, Rekik I, Alenezi FN, Vallat A, Luptakova L,
et al . 2017. Comparative genomics ofBacillus amyloliquefaciens strains reveals a core genome with traits for habitat adaptation and a secondary metabolites rich accessory genome.Front. Microbiol. 8 : 1438. - Xu BH, Lu YQ, Ye ZW, Zheng QW, Wei T, Lin JF,
et al . 2018. Genomics-guided discovery and structure identification of cyclic lipopeptides from theBacillus siamensis JFL15.PLoS One 13 : e0202893. - Chen XH, Scholz R, Borriss M, Junge H, Mogel G, Kunz S,
et al . 2009. Difficidin and bacilysin produced by plant-associatedBacillus amyloliquefaciens are efficient in controlling fire blight disease.J. Biotechnol. 140 : 38-44. - Schneider K, Chen XH, Vater J, Franke P, Nicholson G, Borriss R,
et al . 2007. Macrolactin is the polyketide biosynthesis product of the pks2 cluster ofBacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42.J. Nat. Prod. 70 : 1417-1423. - Schneider J, Taraz K, Budzikiewicz H, Deleu M, Thonart P, Jacques P. 1999. The structure of two fengycins from
Bacillus subtilis S499.Z. Naturforsch. C. 54 : 859-866. - Peypoux F, Bonmatin JM, Labbe H, Grangemard I, Das BC, Ptak M, Wallach J,
et al . 1994. [Ala4]surfactin, a novel isoform fromBacillus subtilis studied by mass and NMR spectroscopies.Eur. J. Biochem. 224 : 89-96. - Cui LT, Liu HW, Cheng HC, Wang YN, Wang Q, Li QY,
et al . 2019. Cloning and bioinformatics analysis of LanM gene inBacillus amyloliquefaciens WS-8.Genomics Appl. Biol. 38 : 644-649. - Chin CS, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C,
et al . 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data.Nat. Methods 10 : 563-569. - Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. 2001. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes.
Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 29 : 2607-2618. - Angiuoli SV, Gussman A, Klimke W, Cochrane G, Field D, Garrity G,
et al . 2008. Toward an online repository of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for (meta) genomic annotation.Omics 12 : 137-141. - Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA,
et al . 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology.BMC Genomics 9 : 75. - Weber T, Blin K, Duddela S, Krug D, Kim HU, Bruccoleri R,
et al . 2015. antiSMASH 3.0-a comprehensive resource for the genome mining of biosynthetic gene clusters.Nucleic Acids Res. 43 : W237-243. - Grant JR, StothardP. 2008. The CGView Server: a comparative genomics tool for circular genomes.
Nucleic Acids Res. 36 : W181-184. - Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.
Nat. Methods. 9 : 357-359. - Frazee AC, Pertea G, Jaffe AE, Langmead B, Salzberg SL, Leek JT. 2015. Ballgown bridges the gap between transcriptome assembly and expression analysis.
Nat. Biotechnol. 33 : 243-246. - Xin B, Zheng J, Xu Z, Li C, Ruan L, Peng D,
et al . 2015. Three novel lantibiotics, ticins A1, A3, and A4, have extremely stable properties and are promising food biopreservatives.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81 : 6964-6972. - Xin B, Zheng J, Xu Z, Song X, Ruan L, Peng D,
et al . 2015. TheBacillus cereus group is an excellent reservoir of novel lanthipeptides.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81 : 1765-1774. - Devillers J, Steiman R, Seigle-Murandi F. 1989. The usefulness of the agar-well diffusion method for assessing chemical toxicity to bacteria and fungi.
Chemosphere 19 : 1693-1700. - Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV,
et al . 2003. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes.BMC Bioinformatics 4 : 41. - Kanehisa M, Goto S, Hattori M, Aoki-Kinoshita KF, Itoh M, Kawashima S,
et al . 2006. From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG.Nucleic Acids Res. 34 : D354-357. - Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM,
et al . 2000. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology.The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25 : 25-29. - Xie L, Miller LM, Chatterjee C, Averin O, Kelleher NL, van der Donk WA. 2004. Lacticin 481: in vitro reconstitution of lantibiotic synthetase activity.
Science 303 : 679-681. - Wang J, Ge X, Zhang L, Teng K, Zhong J. 2016. One-pot synthesis of class II lanthipeptide bovicin HJ50 via an engineered lanthipeptide synthetase.
Sci. Rep. 6 : 38630. - Zhi Y, Wu Q, Xu Y. 2017. Genome and transcriptome analysis of surfactin biosynthesis in
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MT45.Sci. Rep. 7 : 40976. - Williamson B, Tudzynski B, Tudzynski P, Van Kan JAL. 2007.
Botrytis cinerea : the cause of grey mould disease.Mol. Plant Pathol. 8 : 561-580. - ten Have A, Mulder W, Visser J, van Kan JAL. 1998. The endopolygalacturonase gene Bcpg1 is required for full virulence of
Botrytis cinerea .Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 11 : 1009-1016. - Yu GY, Sinclair JB, Hartman GL, Bertagnolli BL. 2002. Production of iturin A by
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens suppressing Rhizoctonia solani.Soil Biol. Biochem. 34 : 955-963. - Stein T. 2005.
Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: structures, syntheses and specific functions.Mol. Microbiol. 56 : 845-857. - Beric T, Kojic M, Stankovic S, Topisirovic L, Degrassi G, Myers M,
et al . 2012. Antimicrobial activity of Bacillus sp natural isolates and their potential use in the biocontrol of phytopathogenic bacteria.Food Technol. Biotechnol. 50 : 25-31. - Arrebola E, Jacobs R, Korsten L. 2010. Iturin A is the principal inhibitor in the biocontrol activity of
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PPCB004 against postharvest fungal pathogens.J. Appl. Microbiol. 108 : 386-395. - Kim PI, Bai H, Bai D, Chae H, Chung S, Kim Y,
et al . 2004. Purification and characterization of a lipopeptide produced byBacillus thuringiensis CMB26.J. Appl. Microbiol. 97 : 942-949. - Maget-Dana R, Thimon L, Peypoux F, Ptak M. 1992. Surfactin/iturin A interactions may explain the synergistic effect of surfactin on the biological properties of iturin A.
Biochimie 74 : 1047-1051.
Related articles in JMB
Article
Research article
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020; 30(3): 417-426
Published online March 28, 2020 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1906.06055
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Genomics and LC-MS Reveal Diverse Active Secondary Metabolites in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens WS-8
Hongwei Liu 1, 2, 3, Yana Wang 2, 3, Qingxia Yang 2, 3, 4, Wenya Zhao 2, 3, 4, Liting Cui 2, 3, Buqing Wang 2, 3, Liping Zhang 2, 3, Huicai Cheng 2, 3, Shuishan Song 2, 3* and Liping Zhang 1*
1College of life science, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, P.R.China, 2Institute of Biology, Hebei Academy of Science, Shijiazhuang 050081, P.R.China, 3Main Crops Disease of Microbial Control Engineering Technology Research Center in Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050081, P.R.China, 4Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, P.R.China
Abstract
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens is an important plant disease-preventing and growth-promoting microorganism. B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8 can stimulate plant growth and has strong antifungal properties. In this study, we sequenced the complete genome of B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8 by Pacific Biosciences RSII (PacBio) Single Molecule Real-Time (SMRT) sequencing. The genome consists of one chromosome (3,929,787 bp) and no additional plasmids. The main bacteriostatic substances were determined by genome, transcriptome, and mass spectrometry data. We thereby laid a theoretical foundation for the utilization of the strain. By genomic analysis, we identified 19 putative biosynthetic gene clusters for secondary metabolites, most of which are potentially involved in the biosynthesis of numerous bioactive metabolites, including difficidin, fengycin, and surfactin. Furthermore, a potential class II lanthipeptide biosynthetic gene cluster and genes that are involved in auxin biosynthesis were found. Through the analysis of transcriptome data, we found that the key bacteriostatic genes, as predicted in the genome, exhibited different levels of mRNA expression. Through metabolite isolation, purification, and exposure experiments, we found that a variety of metabolites of WS-8 exert an inhibitory effect on the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea, which causes gray mold; by mass spectrometry, we found that the main substances are mainly iturins and fengycins. Therefore, this strain has the potential to be utilized as an antifungal agent in agriculture.
Keywords: Bacillus amyloliquefaciens WS-8, genome sequence, biosynthetic gene cluster, antifungal, plant growth promoting
Introduction
Pathogenic microorganisms affecting plant health are a major and chronic threat to food production and ecosystem stability all over the world [1]. At present, chemical control is the main approach to control plant diseases [2]. However, the long-term use of chemical fungicides has resulted in serious and multiple resistance of pathogenic microorganisms. At the same time, pesticide residues have polluted the environment, endangered human health, and destroyed the ecological balance. Biological control has attracted more and more attention and played an increasingly important role in the world because of its advantages to the environment, ecology, and human health.
The whole genome of
Fengycin, iturin, surfactin [7], difficidin, bacilysin [8], and macrolactin [9] are among the main antifungal peptides synthesized by the non-ribosomal pathway of
-
Figure 1. The chemical structure of fengycins (
A ), iturins (B ), surfactins (C ).
Although many strains have been used to control plant diseases, more efficient strains are still needed in agriculture. Before the use of a new strain as a biocontrol agent, it is recommendable to identify its main active substances.
Materials and Methods
Microorganisms and Culture Conditions
DNA Isolation, Genome Sequencing and Assembly
Genomic DNA of
Gene Prediction and Identification of Secondary Metabolite Clusters
Gene prediction was performed on the WS-8 genome assembly by GeneMarkS [14] with an integrated model which combines the GeneMarkS generated (native) and heuristic model parameters. Gene annotation was added by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline [15]. The genome comparison was carried out by RAST version 2.0 [16]. Genes potentially involved in the biosynthesis of antibiotics and secondary metabolites were identified using antiSMASH3.0 [17]. Genome overview was created by CGView Server to show the annotation information of WS-8 [18].
Transcriptomic Analysis Using RNA-Seq
For RNA extraction, cells were cultivated for 32 h and harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 ×
Raw data (raw reads, fastq files) were first processed using in-house Perl scripts from Beijing Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. In this step, clean data (clean reads) were obtained by removing reads containing adapters, reads containing poly-N tails, and low-quality reads from the raw data. Q20, Q30, and GC content of the clean data were calculated. All of the downstream analyses were based on the high-quality clean data. The remaining clear reads were mapped to the reference genome of WS-8 using Bowtie2 software based on the local alignment algorithm [19]. HTSeq v0.6.1 was used to count the reads mapped to each gene. The fragments per kilobase of transcripts per million mapped reads (FPKM) of each gene was calculated based on the length of the gene and read count mapped to this gene [20]. The transcriptomic data of
Purification of Anti-Gray-Mold Compounds
The strain WS-8 was grown in nutrient broth (NB) at 32°C for 32 h. After centrifugation (10,000 rpm, 30 min, and 4°C), cells were removed and the cell-free supernatant (4 liters) was shaken with 200 g of Amberlite XAD-7HP (Sigma, USA) for 12 h at 18°C. The antimicrobial crude extract (CE) was obtained following the protocol of Xin [21]. Further purification was carried out by HPLC (SHIMADZU LC-20A, Japan) with a C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm; WONDASIL, Japan) at room temperature. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile and HPLC-grade water (with 0.1%trifluoroacetic acid [TFA]). A linear gradient was used for elution at a flow rate of 1 ml/min as follows: 0-60 min, from 10% to 80%acetonitrile (linear gradient); 60-65 min, from 80% to 90% acetonitrile (linear gradient); 65-75 min, 90% acetonitrile (isocratic); 75-80 min, from 90% to 10% acetonitrile (linear gradient); 80-90 min, 10%acetonitrile (isocratic). Elution was monitored by determining absorbance at 214 nm, and fractions were manually collected each minute. Using the agar well diffusion method [22, 23], fractions with anti-gray-mold (
LC-MS/MS Analysis
Liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was performed by the Thermo Fisher UltiMate 3000 UPLC/Q-Exactive Orbitrap MS system. The UHPLC conditions were as follows: Thermo GOLD HYPERSIL column (C18, 50 × 2.1 mm, 1.9 µm; Thermo), eluent A was H2O/0.1% formic acid, eluent B was CH3OH/0.1% formic acid, flow rate was 300 µl/min, elution gradient was 70%A/30%B to 10%A/90%B, 20 min. The MS operating conditions were as follows: the temperature was 300°C, a sheath gas rate of 35 l/min, auxiliary gas rate of 35 l/min, electrospray voltage of 3.0 kV for positive full scan mode, and an
Results
General Genome Features of B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8
A total of 90,776 reads, with approximately 311-fold coverage (approximately 1.227 G), were obtained. Compared to the type strain
-
Table 1 . General genome features of
B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8..Feature Value Genome size (bp) 3929787 GC content [%] 45.6 Predicted genes 3895 Protein coding genes (CDSs) 3777 Pseudo genes 107 tRNA genes 86 rRNA genes 27 ncRNAs genes 5
-
Figure 2. Circular genome map of
B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8. The circular map consists of 5 circles. From the outermost circle inwards, circle (1) and circle (2) show the coding gene distributions in the forward strand and the backward strand, respectively, including tRNA (brown), rRNA (pink), and other (gray); and circle (3) shows GC content; circle (4) and circle (5) show GC skew+ and GC skew-, respectively.
Using RAST version 2.0 under the Compare Metabolic Reconstruction model, a total of 2,428 functioning parts genes were found, 170 and 108 unique genes were identified from
Functional Gene Annotation
-
Figure 3. COG categories of
B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8.
-
Table 2 . Secondary metabolite clusters in
B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8 identified by antiSMASH 3.0..Cluster Type From To Most similar known biosynthetic gene cluster (percent of similarity) MIBiG BGC-ID 1 Polyketide 106469 206922 Difficidin (93% ) BGC0000176_c1 2 Polyketide 321899 363008 NA NA 3 Terpene 426326 448209 NA NA 4 Nonribosomal peptide 473436 611237 Fengycin (93%) BGC0001095_c1 5 Nonribosomal peptide 675868 778542 Bacillaene (92%) BGC0001089_c1 6 Polyketide 1004652 1090557 Macrolactin (90%) BGC0000181_c1 7 Lantipeptide 1259447 1288335 NA NA 8 Terpene 1408827 1429567 NA NA 9 Polyketide 1511611 1552855 Butirosin (7%) BGC0000693_c1 10 Microcin 1609461 1629609 NA NA 11 Microcin 1878888 1899036 NA NA 12 Nonribosomal peptide 2089305 2154712 Surfactin (78%) BGC0000433_c1 13 Microcin 2298675 2324765 NA NA 14 Microcin 2369207 2395180 NA NA 15 Microcin 2435066 2455214 NA NA 16 Microcin 2456802 2476950 NA NA 17 Other 2776305 2817723 Bacilysin (85%) BGC0001184_c1 18 Nonribosomal peptide 3354032 3405823 Bacillibactin (92%) BGC0000309_c1 19 Microcin 3470058 3490206 NA NA
Transcriptome Analysis of Secondary Metabolite Clusters
The transcriptome of stationary phase of the strain WS-8 was sequenced with the HiSeq4000 sequencing platform. A total of 9,006,772 clean Reads and 1.35 G clean data were obtained. The Q20 and Q30 of clean data were 98.07% and 94.69%, respectively. The GC content of the transcriptome was 48.08%. About 97.97% of the clean reads were mapped to the WS-8 genome. Using the annotation of antiSMASH for mapping and FPKM values to indicate the expression levels, the mapped genes were classified into four groups (Table 3). Using a threshold of FPKM > 1 to define potential gene expression [29], 3,540 expressed genes were sequenced. As shown in Table 3, more than 93% of the genes were expressed in the stationary phase. Most genes were expressed at a medium level, and more than 13% of the genes were expressed at a high level. In addition, there were 277 non-expressed genes.
-
Table 3 . Transcriptomic features of
B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8..FPKM Interval Gene counts Percentage 0~1 277 60.2% 1~10 0 0.00% 10~500 3,045 80.83% >500 495 13.14% The transcripts were assessed based on FPKM values: high expression (FPKM ≥ 500), medium expression (10 ≤ FPKM< 500), low expression (1 ≤ FPKM < 10), and no expression (FPKM < 1)..
Using the FPKM value, the expression levels of core genes in gene clusters related to antibacterial substances were analyzed. We found that core genes of six gene clusters, which are homologous to bacillibactin, fengycin, bacillaene, difficidin, macrolactin, and surfactin biosynthetic gene cluster were all expressed (Fig. 4). All of the bacillibactin genes (bsuF, bsuB, bsuE, and bsuA), fengycin genes (fenA, fenB, fenC, fenD, and fenE), bacillaene genes (
-
Figure 4. FPKM values of core genes of different gene clusters.
Purification and UPLC-MS Analysis of Antibacterial Substances from WS-8
The antimicrobial compounds were enriched by Amberlite XAD-7HP from the cell-free supernatant and isolated by HPLC. Using gray mold as indicator bacteria, we tested all of the HPLC fractions. We found 25 fractions with anti-gray-mold activity. The Thermo Fisher UltiMate 3000 UPLC/Q-Exactive Orbitrap MS system was employed to analyze the above 25 fractions, and we found many fractions containing the same compound. Ten of these fractions (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, and j) containing non-repeating substances for further analysis were chosen, and 21 compounds showing anti-gray-mold activity were identified (Fig. 5).
-
Figure 5. UPLC and anti-gray-mold activity analysis of the 10 fractions from
B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8.
Using MS to elucidate the exact molecular weight of these 21 compounds, we identified 14 lipopeptides belonging to two main types: iturin and fengycin (Table 4). Many of the components have similar charge-to-mass ratios (
-
Table 4 . The
m/z value of active substance detected by Q-Exactive Orbitrap MS..Fraction no. Compound no. m/z m/z Characteristic fragment ions Retention time (min) Identification [M+H]+ [M+Na]+ a 1 1043.5474 1065.5284 - 3.66 C14Iturin A 2 1044.5328 1066.5145 - 3.82 C14 Iturin B 3 1044.5334 1066.5149 - 4.44 C14 Iturin B 4 1057.5643 1079.5454 - 4.53 C15Iturin A 5 1057.5636 1079.5449 - 4.67 C15Iturin A b 6 1435.766 1457.7474 540.77 7.38 C14 Fengycin A c 7 1449.7848 1471.7635 540.77 7.99 C15 Fengycin A d 8 1463.7975 1485.7784 554.79 7.96 C14Fengycin B 9 1449.7836 1471.7632 540.77 8.18 C15 Fengycin A e 10 1449.7816 1471.7626 540.77 8.45 C15 Fengycin A f 11 1477.8138 1499.7944 554.79 8.52 C15 Fengycin B 12 1463.7969 1485.7777 540.77 8.72 C16 Fengycin A 13 1463.7974 1485.7789 540.77 8.91 C16 Fengycin A g 14 1477.8138 1499.7888 540.77 9.08 C17 Fengycin A 15 1477.814 1499.7932 540.77 9.3 C17 Fengycin A 16 1477.8157 1499.7963 540.77 9.42 C17 Fengycin A h 17 1491.8285 1513.8091 554.79 9.4 C16 Fengycin B i 18 1505.8439 1527.825 554.79 9.86 C17 Fengycin B 19 1447.8036 1469.7852 540.77 10.18 C15:1 Fengycin A j 20 1461.8197 1483.8 540.77 10.55 C16:1 Fengycin A 21 1475.8328 1497.8135 554.79 10.66 C15:1 Fengycin B
The remaining 16 compounds were identified as fengycins. Fengycin A and fengycin B are different in their sixth amino acids of cyclic octapeptide (Ala and Val respectively). So, in the process of mass spectrometry, the daughter ion of MS peaks are different. Therefore, ion fragments (
Compounds 6, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21 have unique
Besides, three compounds (7, 9, and 10), with an
Compounds 8, 12, and 13 have similar molecular ion peaks (
The last four compounds (11, 14, 15, and 16) show a similar molecular ion peak of the protonated [M+H]+ fragment at 1477.81, but their characteristic fraction ions (Fig. S7) are also different. Compound 11, containing doubly charged fragment ions of
Discussion
Plant disease has always been an important problem in agriculture.
Ten fractions (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, and k) containing 21 compounds with strong anti-gray-mold activity were fractionated from the cell-free supernatants of
Surfactin does not have antifungal activity, but it can enhance the antifungal activity of other lipopeptide, especially iturin [36, 37]. In this research, although core genes of surfactin biosynthesis cluster were under high expression level, but no surfatin was detected. Because of no anti-graymold activity, the fractions containing surfactin probably were abandoned after the active test.
In conclusion, the genome of
Supplemental Materials
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by grants from the Science and technology planning project of Hebei academy of sciences (19304), High-level talents funding projects of Hebei province (B2018003019), and High-level talents training and funding projects of Hebei academy of sciences (2018G01). We thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
Fig 1.
Fig 2.
Fig 3.
Fig 4.
Fig 5.
-
Table 1 . General genome features of
B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8..Feature Value Genome size (bp) 3929787 GC content [%] 45.6 Predicted genes 3895 Protein coding genes (CDSs) 3777 Pseudo genes 107 tRNA genes 86 rRNA genes 27 ncRNAs genes 5
-
Table 2 . Secondary metabolite clusters in
B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8 identified by antiSMASH 3.0..Cluster Type From To Most similar known biosynthetic gene cluster (percent of similarity) MIBiG BGC-ID 1 Polyketide 106469 206922 Difficidin (93% ) BGC0000176_c1 2 Polyketide 321899 363008 NA NA 3 Terpene 426326 448209 NA NA 4 Nonribosomal peptide 473436 611237 Fengycin (93%) BGC0001095_c1 5 Nonribosomal peptide 675868 778542 Bacillaene (92%) BGC0001089_c1 6 Polyketide 1004652 1090557 Macrolactin (90%) BGC0000181_c1 7 Lantipeptide 1259447 1288335 NA NA 8 Terpene 1408827 1429567 NA NA 9 Polyketide 1511611 1552855 Butirosin (7%) BGC0000693_c1 10 Microcin 1609461 1629609 NA NA 11 Microcin 1878888 1899036 NA NA 12 Nonribosomal peptide 2089305 2154712 Surfactin (78%) BGC0000433_c1 13 Microcin 2298675 2324765 NA NA 14 Microcin 2369207 2395180 NA NA 15 Microcin 2435066 2455214 NA NA 16 Microcin 2456802 2476950 NA NA 17 Other 2776305 2817723 Bacilysin (85%) BGC0001184_c1 18 Nonribosomal peptide 3354032 3405823 Bacillibactin (92%) BGC0000309_c1 19 Microcin 3470058 3490206 NA NA
-
Table 3 . Transcriptomic features of
B. amyloliquefaciens WS-8..FPKM Interval Gene counts Percentage 0~1 277 60.2% 1~10 0 0.00% 10~500 3,045 80.83% >500 495 13.14% The transcripts were assessed based on FPKM values: high expression (FPKM ≥ 500), medium expression (10 ≤ FPKM< 500), low expression (1 ≤ FPKM < 10), and no expression (FPKM < 1)..
-
Table 4 . The
m/z value of active substance detected by Q-Exactive Orbitrap MS..Fraction no. Compound no. m/z m/z Characteristic fragment ions Retention time (min) Identification [M+H]+ [M+Na]+ a 1 1043.5474 1065.5284 - 3.66 C14Iturin A 2 1044.5328 1066.5145 - 3.82 C14 Iturin B 3 1044.5334 1066.5149 - 4.44 C14 Iturin B 4 1057.5643 1079.5454 - 4.53 C15Iturin A 5 1057.5636 1079.5449 - 4.67 C15Iturin A b 6 1435.766 1457.7474 540.77 7.38 C14 Fengycin A c 7 1449.7848 1471.7635 540.77 7.99 C15 Fengycin A d 8 1463.7975 1485.7784 554.79 7.96 C14Fengycin B 9 1449.7836 1471.7632 540.77 8.18 C15 Fengycin A e 10 1449.7816 1471.7626 540.77 8.45 C15 Fengycin A f 11 1477.8138 1499.7944 554.79 8.52 C15 Fengycin B 12 1463.7969 1485.7777 540.77 8.72 C16 Fengycin A 13 1463.7974 1485.7789 540.77 8.91 C16 Fengycin A g 14 1477.8138 1499.7888 540.77 9.08 C17 Fengycin A 15 1477.814 1499.7932 540.77 9.3 C17 Fengycin A 16 1477.8157 1499.7963 540.77 9.42 C17 Fengycin A h 17 1491.8285 1513.8091 554.79 9.4 C16 Fengycin B i 18 1505.8439 1527.825 554.79 9.86 C17 Fengycin B 19 1447.8036 1469.7852 540.77 10.18 C15:1 Fengycin A j 20 1461.8197 1483.8 540.77 10.55 C16:1 Fengycin A 21 1475.8328 1497.8135 554.79 10.66 C15:1 Fengycin B
References
- Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Clement C, Barka EA. 2005. Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71 : 4951-4959. - Hirooka T, Ishii H. 2013. Chemical control of plant diseases.
J. General Plant Pathol. 79 : 390-401. - Fickers P. 2012. Antibiotic compounds from Bacillus: Why are they so Amazing?
Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 8 : 38-43. - Johnson BA, Anker H, Meleney FL. 1945. Bacitracin: A New antibiotic produced by a member of the
B. Subtilis Group.Science 102 : 376-377. - Chen XH, Koumoutsi A, Scholz R, Eisenreich A, Schneider K, Heinemeyer I,
et al . 2007. Comparative analysis of the complete genome sequence of the plant growth-promoting bacteriumBacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42.Nat. Biotechnol. 25 : 1007-1014. - Belbahri L, Chenari Bouket A, Rekik I, Alenezi FN, Vallat A, Luptakova L,
et al . 2017. Comparative genomics ofBacillus amyloliquefaciens strains reveals a core genome with traits for habitat adaptation and a secondary metabolites rich accessory genome.Front. Microbiol. 8 : 1438. - Xu BH, Lu YQ, Ye ZW, Zheng QW, Wei T, Lin JF,
et al . 2018. Genomics-guided discovery and structure identification of cyclic lipopeptides from theBacillus siamensis JFL15.PLoS One 13 : e0202893. - Chen XH, Scholz R, Borriss M, Junge H, Mogel G, Kunz S,
et al . 2009. Difficidin and bacilysin produced by plant-associatedBacillus amyloliquefaciens are efficient in controlling fire blight disease.J. Biotechnol. 140 : 38-44. - Schneider K, Chen XH, Vater J, Franke P, Nicholson G, Borriss R,
et al . 2007. Macrolactin is the polyketide biosynthesis product of the pks2 cluster ofBacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42.J. Nat. Prod. 70 : 1417-1423. - Schneider J, Taraz K, Budzikiewicz H, Deleu M, Thonart P, Jacques P. 1999. The structure of two fengycins from
Bacillus subtilis S499.Z. Naturforsch. C. 54 : 859-866. - Peypoux F, Bonmatin JM, Labbe H, Grangemard I, Das BC, Ptak M, Wallach J,
et al . 1994. [Ala4]surfactin, a novel isoform fromBacillus subtilis studied by mass and NMR spectroscopies.Eur. J. Biochem. 224 : 89-96. - Cui LT, Liu HW, Cheng HC, Wang YN, Wang Q, Li QY,
et al . 2019. Cloning and bioinformatics analysis of LanM gene inBacillus amyloliquefaciens WS-8.Genomics Appl. Biol. 38 : 644-649. - Chin CS, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C,
et al . 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data.Nat. Methods 10 : 563-569. - Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. 2001. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes.
Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 29 : 2607-2618. - Angiuoli SV, Gussman A, Klimke W, Cochrane G, Field D, Garrity G,
et al . 2008. Toward an online repository of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for (meta) genomic annotation.Omics 12 : 137-141. - Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA,
et al . 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology.BMC Genomics 9 : 75. - Weber T, Blin K, Duddela S, Krug D, Kim HU, Bruccoleri R,
et al . 2015. antiSMASH 3.0-a comprehensive resource for the genome mining of biosynthetic gene clusters.Nucleic Acids Res. 43 : W237-243. - Grant JR, StothardP. 2008. The CGView Server: a comparative genomics tool for circular genomes.
Nucleic Acids Res. 36 : W181-184. - Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.
Nat. Methods. 9 : 357-359. - Frazee AC, Pertea G, Jaffe AE, Langmead B, Salzberg SL, Leek JT. 2015. Ballgown bridges the gap between transcriptome assembly and expression analysis.
Nat. Biotechnol. 33 : 243-246. - Xin B, Zheng J, Xu Z, Li C, Ruan L, Peng D,
et al . 2015. Three novel lantibiotics, ticins A1, A3, and A4, have extremely stable properties and are promising food biopreservatives.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81 : 6964-6972. - Xin B, Zheng J, Xu Z, Song X, Ruan L, Peng D,
et al . 2015. TheBacillus cereus group is an excellent reservoir of novel lanthipeptides.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81 : 1765-1774. - Devillers J, Steiman R, Seigle-Murandi F. 1989. The usefulness of the agar-well diffusion method for assessing chemical toxicity to bacteria and fungi.
Chemosphere 19 : 1693-1700. - Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV,
et al . 2003. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes.BMC Bioinformatics 4 : 41. - Kanehisa M, Goto S, Hattori M, Aoki-Kinoshita KF, Itoh M, Kawashima S,
et al . 2006. From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG.Nucleic Acids Res. 34 : D354-357. - Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM,
et al . 2000. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology.The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25 : 25-29. - Xie L, Miller LM, Chatterjee C, Averin O, Kelleher NL, van der Donk WA. 2004. Lacticin 481: in vitro reconstitution of lantibiotic synthetase activity.
Science 303 : 679-681. - Wang J, Ge X, Zhang L, Teng K, Zhong J. 2016. One-pot synthesis of class II lanthipeptide bovicin HJ50 via an engineered lanthipeptide synthetase.
Sci. Rep. 6 : 38630. - Zhi Y, Wu Q, Xu Y. 2017. Genome and transcriptome analysis of surfactin biosynthesis in
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MT45.Sci. Rep. 7 : 40976. - Williamson B, Tudzynski B, Tudzynski P, Van Kan JAL. 2007.
Botrytis cinerea : the cause of grey mould disease.Mol. Plant Pathol. 8 : 561-580. - ten Have A, Mulder W, Visser J, van Kan JAL. 1998. The endopolygalacturonase gene Bcpg1 is required for full virulence of
Botrytis cinerea .Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 11 : 1009-1016. - Yu GY, Sinclair JB, Hartman GL, Bertagnolli BL. 2002. Production of iturin A by
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens suppressing Rhizoctonia solani.Soil Biol. Biochem. 34 : 955-963. - Stein T. 2005.
Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: structures, syntheses and specific functions.Mol. Microbiol. 56 : 845-857. - Beric T, Kojic M, Stankovic S, Topisirovic L, Degrassi G, Myers M,
et al . 2012. Antimicrobial activity of Bacillus sp natural isolates and their potential use in the biocontrol of phytopathogenic bacteria.Food Technol. Biotechnol. 50 : 25-31. - Arrebola E, Jacobs R, Korsten L. 2010. Iturin A is the principal inhibitor in the biocontrol activity of
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PPCB004 against postharvest fungal pathogens.J. Appl. Microbiol. 108 : 386-395. - Kim PI, Bai H, Bai D, Chae H, Chung S, Kim Y,
et al . 2004. Purification and characterization of a lipopeptide produced byBacillus thuringiensis CMB26.J. Appl. Microbiol. 97 : 942-949. - Maget-Dana R, Thimon L, Peypoux F, Ptak M. 1992. Surfactin/iturin A interactions may explain the synergistic effect of surfactin on the biological properties of iturin A.
Biochimie 74 : 1047-1051.