전체메뉴
검색
Article Search

JMB Journal of Microbiolog and Biotechnology

QR Code QR Code

Research article

References

  1. Litake GM GV, Niphadkar KB, Joshi SG. 2015. Phenotypic ESBL detection in Acinetobacter baumannii: a real challenge. Am. J. Infect. Dis. 11: 48-53.
    CrossRef
  2. LB R. 2010. Progress and challenges in implementing the research on ESKAPE pathogens. Infect. Control Hospital Epidemiol. 31: S7-S10.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2013. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States. Atlanta. GA.
  4. Paterson DL BR. 2005. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: a clinical update. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18: 657-686.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  5. Mishra SK RB, Pokhrel BM. 2013. Emerging threat of multidrug resistant bugs-Acinetobacter calcoaceticus baumannii complex and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Res. Notes 6: 98-103.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  6. Shaikh S FJ, Shakil S, Rizvi SMD, Kamal MA. 2015. Prevalence of multidrug resistant and extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a tertiary care hospital. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 22: 62-64.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  7. Yares R. 1999. New intervention strategies for reducing antibiotic resistance. Chest 115: 245-275.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Prat CLA. 2016. Bacteria in the respiratory tract-how to treat? Or do not treat? Int. J. Infect. Dis. 51: 113-122.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Sengstock DM TR, Apalara J, Mira A, Chopra T, Kaye KS. 2010. Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: an emerging pathogen among older adults in community hospitals and nursing homes. Clin. Infect. Dis. 50: 1611-1616.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Albrecht MA EC, Raston CL. 2006. Green chemistry and the health implications of nanoparticles. Green Chem. 8: 417-432.
    CrossRef
  11. Arachchige MC RY, Andreev OA. 2015. Advanced targeted nanomedicine. J. Biotechnol. 20: 88-97.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  12. Anand K GR, Phulukdaree A, Chuturgoon A. 2015. Agroforestry waste Moringa oleifera petals mediated green synthesis of gold nanoparticles and their anti-cancer and catalytic activity. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 21: 1105-1111.
    CrossRef
  13. Patil MP KG. 2017. Eco-friendly approach for nanoparticles synthesis and mechanism behind antibacterial activity of silver and anticancer activity of gold nanoparticles. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 101: 79-92.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Raghunandan D RB, Sharanbasava G, Mahesh DB, Harsoor V, Yalagatti MS, Bhagawanraju M, et al. 2011. Anti-cancer studies of noble metal nanoparticles synthesized using different plant extracts. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2: 57-65.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  15. Biju V. 2014. Chemical modifications and bioconjugate reactions of nanomaterials for sensing, imaging, drug delivery and therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43: 737-962.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Demurtas M PC. 2014. Facile one-pot synthesis of amoxicillincoated gold nanoparticles and their antimicrobial activity. Gold Bull. 47: 103-107.
    CrossRef
  17. Cui Y ZY, Tian Y, Zhang W, Lü X, Jiang X. 2012. T he molecular mechanism of action of bactericidal gold nanoparticles on Escherichia coli. Biomaterials 33: 2327-2333.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Gad El-Rab SMF HE, Elzahrani S. 2018. Synthesis of Rifampicin conjugated gold nanoparticled and antimicrobial application against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Res. J. Biotechnol. (In Press).
  19. Garza-Navarro MA A-RJ, Llanas-Vázquez EE, Moreno-Cortez IE, Torres-Castro A, González-González V. 2013. Totally Ecofriendly synthesis of silver nanoparticles from aqueous dissolutions of polysaccharides. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2013: 1-8.
    CrossRef
  20. Yu J XD, Guan HN, Wang C, Huang LK. 2016. Facile onestep green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Citrus maxima aqueous extracts and its catalytic activity. Mater. Lett. 166: 110-112.
    CrossRef
  21. Harshiny M MM, Arthanareeswaran G, Kumaran S, Rajasree S. 2015. Enhancement of antibacterial properties of silver nanoparticles- ceftriaxone conjugate through Mukia maderaspatana leaf extract mediated synthesis. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 121: 135-141.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Shaker MA SM. 2017. Formulation of carbapenems loaded gold nanoparticles to combat multi-antibiotic bacterial resistance: in vitro antibacterial study. Int. J. Pharmaceutics 525: 71-84.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Kanmani P LS. 2013. Synthesis and characterization of pullulan-mediated silver nanoparticles and its antimicrobial activities. Carbohydr. Polym. 97: 421-428.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Pani A LJ, Yun S. 2016. Autoclave mediated one-pot-oneminute synthesis of AgNPs and Au-Ag nanocomposite from Melia azedarach bark extract with antimicrobial activity against food pathogens. Chem. Cent J. 10: 15.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  25. Szende B TE, Trezl L. 2001. Role of arginine and its methylated derivatives in cancer biology and treatment. Cancer Cell Int. 17: 1-3.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  26. Horiuchi N NK, Sasaki Y, Minato K, Fujiwara Y, Nezu K, et al. 1998. In vitro antitumor activity of mitomycin C derivative (RM- 49) and a new anticancer antibiotic (FK973) against lung cancer cell lines determined by tetrazolium dye (MTT) assay. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 22: 246-250.
    CrossRef
  27. Brun ME GS, Girard C, Bouton K, De Massy B, De Sario A. 2006. Characterization and expression analysis during embryo development of the mouse ortholog of MLL3. Gene 371: 25-33.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Hassan AM A-AS, Abdel-Wahhab MA. 2012. Modulation of DNA damage and alteration of gene expression during aflatoxicosis via dietary supplementation of Spirulina (Arthrospira) and whey protein concentrate. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 79: 294-300.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Du J ZZ, Zhang X, Wu S, Xiong J, Wang W, Luo Q. 2017. Biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles by flavonoids from Lilium casa blanca. J. Cluster Sci. 28: 3149-3158.
    CrossRef
  30. Yang N WL, Hao L. 2014. Biosynthesis of Au nanoparticles using agricultural waste mango peel extract and its in-vitro cytotoxic effect on two normal cells. Mat. Lett. 134: 67-70.
    CrossRef
  31. Zaki NM HM. 2012. Enhanced antibacterial effect of ceftriaxone sodium-loaded chitosan nanoparticles against intracellular Salmonella typhimurium. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 13: 411-421.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  32. Shaikh S RS, Shakil S, Hussain T, Alshammari TM, Ahmad W, Tabrez S, et al. 2017. Synthesis and characterization of cefotaxime conjugated gold nanoparticles and their use to target drug-resistant CTX-M-producing bacterial pathogens. J. Cell. Biochem. 9999: 1-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Alkilany AM MC. 2010. Toxicity and cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles: what we have learned so far? J. Nanoparticle Res. 12: 2313-2333.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  34. Brown AN SK, Samuels TA, Lu J, Obare SO, Scott ME. 2012. Nanoparticles functionalized with ampicillin destroy multipleantibiotic-resistant isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter aerogenes and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78: 2768-2774.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  35. Grace AN PK. 2007. Quinolone antibiotic-capped gold nanoparticles and their antibacterial efficacy against gram positive and gram negative organisms. J. Bionanosci. 1: 96-105.
    CrossRef
  36. Kalita S KR, Sharma KK, Kataki AC, Deka M, Kotoky J. 2016. Amoxicillin functionalized gold nanoparticles reverts MRSA resistance. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 61: 720-727.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  37. Mohseni N SF, Ardestani MS, Kazemi-Lomedasht F, Ghorbani M. 2016. Inhibitory effect of gold nanoparticles conjugated with interferon gamma and methionine on breast cancer cell line. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 6: 173-178.
    CrossRef
  38. Das S DJ, Samadder A, Bhattacharyya SS, Das D, Khuda-Bukhsh AR. 2013. Biosynthesized silver nanoparticles by ethanolic extracts of Phytolacca decandra, Gelsemium sempervirens, Hydrastis canadensis and Thuja occidentalis induce differential cytotoxicity through G2/M arrest in A375 cells. Colloid Surf. B. 101: 325-336.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Raghunandan D BP, Bendegumble B, Bedre MD, Bhagawanraju M, Yalagatti MS. 2011a. Microwave-assisted rapid extracellular biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using carom seed (Trachyspermum copticum) extract and in vitro studies. Am. J. Anal. Chem. 2: 475-483.
    CrossRef
  40. Selim ME HA. 2012. Gold nanoparticles induce apoptosis in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Asian Pacific J. Cancer Prev. 15: 9471-9473.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Dipankar C MS. 2012. The green synthesis, characterization and evaluation of the biological activities of silver nanoparticles synthesized from Iresine herbstii leaf aqueous extracts. Colloid. Surf. B. 98: 112-119.
    Pubmed CrossRef

Related articles in JMB

More Related Articles

Article

Research article

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018; 28(9): 1563-1572

Published online September 28, 2018 https://doi.org/10.4014.jmb/1711.11037

Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Formulation of Ceftriaxone Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles and Their Medical Applications against Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Producing Bacteria and Breast Cancer

Sanaa M.F. Gad El-Rab 1, 2*, Eman M. Halawani 3 and Aziza M. Hassan 1, 4

1Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 888, Taif, 21974, Saudi Arabia. , 2Department of Botany and microbiology, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, 71516 Assiut, Egypt. , 3Division of Microbiology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 888, Taif, 21974, Saudi Arabia. , 4Cell Biology Department, National Research Centre, 33 El-Bohooth Street, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.

Received: November 20, 2017; Accepted: July 9, 2018

Abstract

Gold nanoparticles (AuNP) and their conjugates have been gaining a great deal of recognition
in the medical field. Meanwhile, extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL)-producing bacteria
are also demonstrating a challenging problem for health care. The aim of this study was the
biosynthesis of AuNP using Rosa damascenes petal extract and conjugation of ceftriaxone
antibiotic (Cef-AuNP) in inhibiting ESBL-producing bacteria and study of in vitro anticancer
activity. Characterization of the synthesized AuNP and Cef-AuNP was studied. ESBLproducing
strains, Acinetobacter baumannii ACI1 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PSE4 were used
for testing the efficacy of Cef-AuNP. The cells of MCF-7 breast cancer were treated with
previous AuNP and Cef-AuNP at different time intervals. Cytotoxicity effects of apoptosis
and its molecular mechanism were evaluated. Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy and Fourier
transform infrared spectroscopy established the formation of AuNP and Cef-AuNP.
Transmission electron microscope demonstrated that the formed nanoparticles were of
different shapes with sizes of 15~35 nm and conjugation was established by a slight increase in
size. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of Cef-AuNP against tested strains were
obtained as 3.6 and 4 μg/ml, respectively. Cef-AuNP demonstrated a decrease in the MIC of
ceftriaxone down to more than 27 folds on the studied strains. The biosynthesized AuNP
displayed apoptotic and time-dependent cytotoxic effects in the cells of MCF-7 at a
concentration of 0.1 μg/ml medium. The Cef-AuNP have low significant effects on MCF-7
cells. These results enhance the conjugating utility in old unresponsive ceftriaxone with AuNP
to restore its efficiency against otherwise resistant bacterial pathogens. Additionally, AuNP
may be used as an alternative chemotherapeutic treatment of MCF-7 cancer cells.

Keywords: Ceftriaxone conjugated gold nanoparticles, antimicrobial activity, antimicrobial activity, etended spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) producing bacteria, MCF-7 Cells, MTT assay

Introduction

Respiratory tract infections (chronic and acute) are a result of inappropriate antimicrobial agents. These agents lead to resistance development and the opportunistic emergence of bacterial pathogens that substitute indigenous microorganisms [1]. Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) bacteria and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) bacteria belong to the ESKAPE pathogens group (Enterococcus faecium, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter species, and Staphylococcus aureus) that are common causes of life-threatening nosocomial infections among immune-compromised and critically ill patients [2]. The occurrence of the ESBL is suspected in A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa diseases when resistance to one or more than one of the extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESC)(ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, cefepime or ceftazidime) [3, 4]. The production of ESBL has become increasingly prevalent among P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii [5-7]. The ESBL enzymes cause inactivation of the antibiotics aztreonam, cephalosporins, penicillins and the β-lactamase inhibitors, which limits the number of effective antibiotics for treatment [3, 4]. The studies on risk factors for infectious diseases due to ESBL-producing A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa are limited and have been related to respiratory tract infections [8, 9].

The application of nano-materials in activating pathogens is in virtue of the inability of such agents to induce resistance in bacteria. Also, nanotechnology appears to have a key role in treating different metabolic and pathological disorders including tumors, HIV, liver diseases, arthritis and inflammation, in addition to having other modern medicinal applications [10, 11]. Recently, the biosynthesis of metal nanoparticles (MNP) with novel, eco-friendly, and non-toxic, convenient plant extracts [12] is under much study. In MNP biosynthesis, the active biogenic functional groups of plant extract play a key role by acting as biological reducing, capping, and stabilizing agents [13]. The biosynthesized MNP can also have reduced toxicity, enhanced biocompatibility and stability, mainly due to coating them with capping agents or biogenic surfactants. The biosynthesized nanoparticles are used in medicinal applications, which contain drug delivery, disinfection, an anticancer agent, imaging, and tissue repair [10]. The AuNP appear to have countless cancer treatment effects due to their amazing interactions on the surface of cancer cells [14]. Because of nontoxicity and non-immunogenicity, AuNP are ideal for drug delivery preparation. Also, AuNP act as an excellent potential vehicle and are highly attractive for are the drug delivery applications due to their functionalization properties (plural) [15]. On the other hand, AuNP alone are believed to lack antibacterial efficiency; it can be conjugated with antibiotics to enhance antibacterial efficacy [16]. AuNP do not contain a reactive oxygen species (ROS) mechanism, although ROS damage is the purpose of cellular death stimulated by some bactericidal nano-materials and antibiotics [17].

Currently, there are no studies for using Cef-AuNPs to control ceftriaxone resistance against ESBL-producing bacterial strains P. aeruginosa PSU4 and A. baumannii ACI1 (as shown in Table 1). These strains were isolated and identified in our previous study[18]. Therefore, this study was designed to look for a new antimicrobial agent such as Cef-AuNP as a good alternative to the antimicrobial compounds of ESBL-producing bacteria. Also, this work is to assess the in vitro anticancer activity of biosynthesized AuNP and Cef-AuNP on MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Thus, the present study is an attempt to revive and turn an old ineffective drug into an effective drug against ESBL-producing bacterial pathogens using AuNP as a tool. To achieve the same, we synthesized AuNP, conjugated them with ceftriaxone, and performed characterization of these using UV-visible spectroscopy, Transmission Electron Microscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, followed by pertinent antibacterial efficacy and anticancer assays. The strategy summarized in the current study is expected to work as a scientific scaffold forming the basis on which a series of new nano-formulations meant for “reviving” old inefficient antibiotics into potent therapeutics could be designed.

Table 1 . Resistance patterns of ESBL-producing bacteria..

Names of isolatesSourceAccession numberAntibiotic resistance profiles
Acinetobacter baumannii ACI1SputumLC325252AK, AMP, AMC, CEC, FOX, FEP, CXM, CAZ, CRO, CTX, CIP, LVX, DO, SXT, CN, MEM, TZP, IPM
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PSE4SputumLC189106AK, AMP, AMC, CEC, FOX, FEP, CXM, CAZ, CRO, CTX, CIP, LVX, DO, SXT, CL, IPM, CN, MEM, CLR, TGC

AK, Amikacin; AMC, Amoxy/Clavulanic acid; CEC, Cefaclor; FEP, Cefepime; CTX, Cefotaxime; FOX, Cefoxitin; CAZ, Ceftazidime; CRO, Ceftriaxone; CXM, Cefuroxime; DO, Doxycycline/HCL; CIP, Ciprofloxacin; LVX, Levofloxacin; CLR, Clarthromycin; AMP, Ampicillin; MEM, Meropenem; SXT, Sulpha/Trimethoprim; TGC, Tigecycline; CN, Gentamicin; IPM, Imipenem; TZP, piperacillin-tazobactam; CL, Chloremphenicol..


Materials and Methods

Bacteria and Growth Conditions

P. aeruginosa PSU4 and A. baumannii ACI1 strains were obtained from our previous study [18]. These strains were ESBL positive and displayed complete resistance to antibiotic ceftriaxone. Before performing the antibacterial activity test, fresh inoculum of each bacterial strain was inoculated in nutrient broth medium and the culture was incubated at 37°C for 18 h. However, turbidity of bacterial cells was detected with the nutrient broth to the common standard (i.e., 1.5 × 108 CFU/ml).

Preparation of Rosa damascenes Petal Extract

The fresh and healthy Rosa damascenes petals were cleaned several times with MilliQ water until no foreign material remained. Twenty-five grams of petals were finely cut and stirred with 100 ml of de-ionized water at 85°C for 20 min. The petal extract was filtered with Whatman No. 1 filter paper and the filtrate was stored at 4°C for further experiments as reducing agent and stabilizer, being usable for within 2 weeks [19].

Biosynthesis of AuNP

Rosa damascenes petal extract was prepared as above. Five ml of petal extract was added drop-wise into 50 ml of 1 mM aqueous solution of HAuCl4 with constant stirring at different temperatures and different pH. The color change was monitored [20]. After complete incubation, the AuNP were collected by centrifuge at 15,000 g for 30 min and washed with de-ionized water. However, 50% ethanol was used to remove excess petal extract from the nanoparticles and the AuNP sample was kept at room temperature until further characterization.

Conjugation of Ceftriaxone with Gold Nanoparticles

In our study, ceftriaxone conjugated gold nanoparticles (Cef-AuNP) were synthesized in a two-stage procedure. The previous method for synthesis of AuNP considered the first stage procedure. In the second stage procedure, ceftriaxone (1 mg/ml) were mixed with AuNP (1 mg/ml) in phosphate buffer solution, incubated for 24 h, and collected at 12,000 g by ultracentrifugation for 10 min [21]. Freshly synthesized Cef-AuNP was dialyzed using a 10 kDa cellulose membrane against double-distilled water overnight to remove any unreacted chemicals. Once dialyzed, the samples were freeze-dried. The Cef-AuNP were obtained and stored to further characterization.

Characterization of AuNP and Cef-AuNP

Nano-materials were characterized according to Harshiny, et al.[21].

UV–visible spectroscopy and analysis of UV–Vis spectra were done by using a double beam spectrophotometer (Shimadzu uv-1650 pc spectrophotometer, Japan). The solutions of AuNP and Cef-AuNP were monitored by measuring the UV–Vis spectrum of the solution in the wavelength range 300–800 nm. The solution of nanoparticles was poured into a test tube and diluted four times with MilliQ water. Finally, it was analyzed at room temperature.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

The TEM technique was used to show the size and shape of the Cef-AuNP and AuNP. The TEM (model JEOL 100CX II with an accelerating voltage of 100 kV, at Electron Microscope Unit, Assiut) was used to determine the TEM image. The sample was prepared by the piping of aqueous Cef-AuNP or AuNP sample drops on carbon-coated copper grids. Then the film on the grid was dried.

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)

Petal extract powder, AuNP, ceftriaxone, and Cef-AuNP were prepared by centrifuging the solution of nano-materials at 15,000 g for 10 min. The residue of previous products was washed with bidistilled water to remove any unattached biological materials from the surface of the nanoparticles. Each residue was then dried, and the powder was used for measurement of FT-IR, which was detected in the 4,000–500 cm−1 region with a spectrometer (Shimadzu IR-470, Japan). The one hundred milligrams dried sample was mixed with 100 mg of grade KBr and pressed into discs under hydraulic pressure. The FT-IR peaks were identified and expressed in wavenumbers (cm−1).

Determination of Conjugating Efficiency of Cef-AuNP

Conjugating efficiency of Cef-AuNP was calculated as Shaker and Shaaban [22]. The Cef-AuNP were centrifuged for 10 min at 12,000 g. Free ceftriaxone drug in the supernatant was quantified by the same aforementioned double beam spectrophotometer (λ max 330) obtained from wave scan [21]. The calibration curve of ceftriaxone antibiotic was schemed in the linear range of 10–100 mg/ml. We needed to find out the amount of ceftriaxone attached to the AuNP to calculate the percentage of ceftriaxone conjugating efficiency. For this, we took out the free drug remaining in the supernatant (or the drug not attached to the AuNP) from the initial amount of ceftriaxone added and used the following equation:

Conjugating efficiency (%) = (Total amount of ceftriaxone – Free ceftriaxone in the supernatant/Total amount of ceftriaxone) × 100.

Antibacterial Activity of Cef-AuNP Using Well Agar Diffusion Method

The AuNP and Cef-AuNP solutions were tested for their antibacterial efficacy against studied ESBL-producing bacteria using the well agar diffusion method [23]. The pathogens cultures were initially inoculated in nutrient broth medium followed by incubation at 37°C for 18 h. The overnight-grown cultures were then again sub-cultured into a nutrient broth for 2 h till 0.01 optical densities. Thus, 100 μl of each bacterial culture was distributed onto the surface of nutrient agar medium and wells of six mm were made on nutrient agar plates. Ceftriaxone, AuNP and Cef-AUNP with different concentration were pipetted into the wells and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The inhibition zone was detected by recording the diameter of clear area around each well.

Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of Cef-AuNP

The MIC evaluation was performed on a 96 well plate. Two hundred μl of AuNP or Cef-AuNP were piped into the 6 wells in column 1. One hundred μl of broth growth medium for each strain was piped into the wells in each row. Thereafter, 100 μl of the AuNP or Cef-AuNP solution was taken from column 1 and was serially diluted along the row until column number 10. Thereafter, 5 μl of the bacterial cultures was piped into each well containing the suitable medium except column number 10, which was considered as blank. Moreover, 50 ml of phenol red dye (2 mg/ml) was pipetted in each well to estimate the viability of bacteria. The plate of 96-well was incubated and red color of bacterial cell viability was detected after an incubation time of 24 h at 37°C. The inhibition of growth was detected as no color was shown in the well. The minimum concentration of Cef-AuNP at which no growth or no color was observed has been considered as MIC value. However, after inoculation of five μl from each well on the surface of agar medium plates, minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) was evaluated. The incubation of bacterial culture plates was obtained at 37°C for 24 h. Finally, the agar medium plates were examined for growth or no growth. The wells containing the minimum concentration of test solutions, showing no growth, were declared as the MBC [24].

Anticancer Activity

Maintenance of cell cultures. The MCF-7 cells (ATCC HB8065, Manassas, VA) used in this study were obtained from Collection of American Type Culture by National Research Center-Egypt. The human breast cancer MCF-7 cell line was kindly provided by Dr. Khaled Fekry -National Research Center-Egypt. The MCF-7 cells were propagated and maintained in Eagles Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM) supplemented with (10%, v/v) Fetal Bovine Serum at 37°C in a CO2 incubator (100% relative humidity, 5% CO2, and 95% air). The cells were harvested after brief trypsinization.

Trypan blue dye exclusion assay. The influence of biosynthesized AuNP and Cef-AuNP on the viability of MCF-7 cancer cells were evaluated and analyzed using the trypan blue dye exclusion assay. The cells were seeded (0.5 × 105 cells/ml) in six-well plates in complete medium. The MCF-7 cells were mixed with 0.1 μg/ml of each treatment (AuNP and Cef-AuNP). Additionally, different times were used for incubation the MCF-7 cells, these times were 24, 48, and 72 h. After the periods of incubation, the cultures of MCF-7 human cancer cell line were harvested, washed, and suspended with phosphate buffered saline (PBS and 0.4% trypan blue) in preparation for the next step. Finally, the hemocytometer apparatus was used for counting the MCF-7 cancer cells [25] and each experiment was carried out in three replications.

MTT assay. In order to evaluate the cytotoxicity of AuNP and Cef-AuNP, the MCF-7 cells were collected in the exponential phase of growth followed by seeding into 96 well tissue culture plates. Additionally, the adherence of cells was allowed for 24 h. Thereafter, 0.1 μg/ml of each AuNP or Cef-AuNP concentration was piped to the desired wells and incubated for 48 h. After incubation, 20 μl of the Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM) containing MTT (3 [4,5dimethylthiazol2yl] 2,5diphenyltetrazolium bromide) (5 mg/ml) was piped to each well and incubated for 4 h at 37°C. Next, the EMEM medium was changed with 100 μl of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) [26]. The viability of MCF-7 human cancer cells was detected by the appearance of the purple color indicating formazan crystal formation. The optical densities were measured at wavelength 570 nm. All experimental measurements of optical densities were determined in triplicate and expressed as the mean standard deviation.

DNA Fragmentation Assay

The fragmentation assay of DNA was carried out using agarose gel electrophoresis. After 72 h, AuNP and Cef-AuNP treated cells were harvested by centrifugation. The cell pellets were mixed with lysis buffer (100 ml) followed by incubation for 1 h at 50°C. Proteinase K (10 μl) was added and incubated for 30 min at 50°C. Three microliters of RNase enzyme was then added and incubated for 2 h at 50°C. The DNA was extracted using isoamyl alcohol: chloroform: phenol (25:24:1) and 2.5 volumes of absolute ethanol. Two percentage of agarose gel was used and stained with ethidium bromide dye. The fragmentation was observed using UV white light transilluminator.

Gene Expression Analysis for Apoptotic Related Genes

Using the manufacturer’s protocol, TRIZOLA reagent (Invitrogen, USA) was used for extracting the total RNA from control and treated MCF-7 cultured cells. The first strand cDNA formation was performed using the reverse transcription Maxime RT PreMix kit.

Bax and TNF-a gene expression was determined using reverse transcription-polymerase chain. Next, the PCR amplification reactions were performed using the PXE 0.5 Thermo thermal cycler apparatus. The initial denaturation step of PCR amplification reactions were performed for 5 min at 95 ºC; then 35 cycles at 95ºC for 30 sec (denaturing); at 55ºC for 40 sec (annealing), and at 72ºC for 1 min (extension); and a further extension at 72ºC for 7 min. The gel bands were stained with ethidium bromide dye, scanned, and the signal intensities were quantified by a densitometer. The ratio between the levels of the GAPDH (housekeeping gene) and target genes-amplification product was calculated to normalize for initial variation in sample concentration as a control for reaction efficiency [27, 28].

Statistical Analysis

All experiments were carried out three times. Results were represented as means ± standard deviation (S.D). The Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS, version 11.0) was used to perform statistical analyses. One-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) was used to compare different time intervals of exposure to the same dose of treatment and p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results and Discussion

Biosynthesis of AuNP

The Rosa damascenes petal extract was added to gold chloride solution. After this step, the mixture color changed from colorless to wine-red within 30 min. This indicated the formation of the AuNP, as shown in Fig. 1 due to the fabrication of AuNP with the biological reducing agents present in the Rosa damascenes petal extract. The biological reducing agents in Rosa damascenes petal extract reduced the gold ions to AuNP. The Rosa damascenes petals are known to contain a rich extract of phenolic compounds that are used as biological reducing agents. The AuNP aqueous solution appeared to have a wine-red color due to the excitation of surface plasmons. Samples of AuNP were removed and analyzed by using UV visible-spectroscopy for the confirmation of AuNP formation at regular time intervals. It was noticed that the complete color change took about 1 h, thereafter no further change occurred in the color of the reaction mixture. This indicated the complete reduction of HAuCl4 in the reaction mixture. The protection, stability, and reductive activity of plant biomolecules accounted for the reduction of gold ions [29]. They have advantages over other metal nanoparticles (MNPs) for being biocompatible and possessing a non-toxic nature [30].

Figure 1. UV-Vis spectrophotometry analysis of AuNP and Ceftriaxone –AuNP.

The Formation of Biosynthesized AuNP Conjugated with Ceftriaxone

Ceftriaxone has a carboxylate group through which it can absorb (sp) into the amino group of the AuNP surface [31]. UV-Vis absorption was also studied after the formation of AuNP and ceftriaxone conjugates; Cef-AuNP were dispersed and absorbance was measured by using UV–visible spectrophotometer between 300 and 800 nm. The Cef-AuNP showed peaks at 330 nm and 530 nm while The UV–visible peak at 530 nm was for pure AuNP (as shown in Fig. 1).

Transmission Electron Microscope Analyses

The AuNP, as well as the Cef-AuNPs were characterized using TEM analysis (Figs. 2A and 2B) and the size of the AuNP and Cef-AuNP were determined to be at 14.2-25.3 nm and 26.6-45.8 nm, respectively. These results suggested that there was an increase in the size of the AuNP due to the attachment of ceftriaxone to the AuNP and these results agree with Shaikh et al. [32]. TEM analysis showed that all these AuNP were of spherical, hexagonal, and triangular shape.

Figure 2. FTIR analysis of Rosa damascenes petals extracts (A), AuNPs (B), Ceftriaxone (C), and Ceftriaxone –AuNPs (D).

Comparison of FTIR Spectra of Rosa damascenes Petal Extract, AuNP, Ceftriaxone, and Cef-AuNP

The FTIR were displayed in the mid-infrared region (MIR) within the range (500–4,000 cm-1), as shown in Fig. 3. The FTIR analysis further confirmed the presence of functional groups representing bioactive compounds of Rosa damascenes extract through the absorption bands at 3,438 cm-1, implying OH stretching, 1,631 cm-1, denoting a carbonyl group, 1,409 cm-1, representing the C-N bond and 1,042 cm-1 of C–N stretch as shown in Fig. 3A. Au metal ions caused a reduction in the absorbance intensities at 3,437 cm-1, representing OH stretching. Absorbance peak at 1,631 cm-1 (carbonyl groups), 1,425 cm-1 (C– N stretching vibrations), 1,019 cm-1 (C–O) and 543 cm-1 (–CH– stretch) have shown that organic compounds in the plant extract have stabilized AuNP, thereby preventing agglomeration (Fig. 3B). Ceftriaxone conjugation was also confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy (Fig. 3C). The absorption peaks that appeared in the FTIR spectrum of ceftriaxone were 3,425, 3,255, and 2,796 cm-1 which could be assigned to the stretching vibrations of N–H, O–H, and C–H groups, respectively. The stretching vibrations of carbonyl groups, C–N, C–O and =C–H appeared at 1,657, 1,356, 1,030, and 750 cm-1, respectively. The vibration modes of C–O and C–C groups were represented by the absorption peaks in the region from 600 to 500 cm-1, respectively [21].

Figure 3. TEM analysis of (A) AuNP and (B) Ceftriaxone-AuNP.

As shown in (Fig. 3D), the conjugation of ceftriaxone with AuNP resulted in merging and the reduction of bands N–H 3,425 cm-1, 1,657 cm-1 carbonyl groups, 1,356 cm-1 C–N and 1030 C–O cm-1 [21].

Calculation of Conjugating Efficiency

Conjugating efficiency is an important parameter in the estimation and characterization of nanoparticles conjugates. The ceftriaxone conjugating efficiency of AuNP was found to be 81.5%. During preparation of ceftriaxone conjugated AuNP, a lesser amount is needed for therapeutic use because the conjugating efficacy should be high so that ceftriaxone is not lost [22, 31].

Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activities of the biosynthesized AuNP and Cef-AuNP were studied by a qualitative well agar diffusion assay on both bacteria. Table 2 showed the inhibition zone (ZOI) for each pathogenic strain. After18 h of incubation at 37°C, the nutrient agar plates containing ceftriaxone, AuNP and Cef-AuNP conjugates exhibited a ZOI around 6–29 mm. The control plates and ceftriaxone antibiotic devoid of AuNP did not exhibit any inhibition zones. P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii showed zones of inhibition of 6 mm for ceftriaxone, 6 and 7 mm respectively, for AuNP, and 27 mm and 29 mm inhibition zones respectively, for Cef-AuNP. The results suggested that the Cef-AuNP were highly effective against bacterial strains compared to ceftriaxone and AuNP alone. Cef-AuNP conjugate exhibited greater antimicrobial efficiency against both bacteria strains.

Table 2 . Antimicrobial activity of ceftriaxone drug, gold nanoparticles and ceftriaxone–AuNP conjugates..

BacteriaZone of inhibition for 1 µg/mL sample

ceftriaxoneAuNPCeftriaxone-AuNP
Acinetobacter baumannii ACI16 mm6 mm27 mm
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PSE46 mm7 mm29 mm


Table 3 . Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of Ceftriaxone-AuNP against ESBL Positive P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii..

BacteriaCeftriaxoneCeftriaxone-AuNPs

MICMICMBC
Acinetobacter baumannii ACI1>100 µg/mL4 µg/mL16 µg/mL
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PSE4>100 µg/mL3.6 µg/mL16 µg/mL


Minimum Inhibitory Concentration and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MIC and MBC) Assays

MIC of Cef-AuNP was found as 3.6 and 4 μg/ml against the tested strains of P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii respectively (Table 2). Moreover, MBC of Cef-AuNP was determined to be 16 μg/ml for each strain. Ceftriaxone-AuNP significantly decreased the MICs of ceftriaxone against P. aerugnosa and A. baumannii by more than 27 times. Because of the unique physiochemical properties of AuNP, such as biocompatibility and non-cytotoxicity, they have been used as drug delivery tools in various studies [33]. Additionally, conjugation ampicillin and carbapenems with AuNP retained its activity and showed potent effect against multi-drug resistant bacteria while AuNP alone were non-toxic [22, 34]. In the same way, our data also indicate that ceftriaxone retain its activity after conjugation to AuNP because unconjugated gold nanoparticles were inactive against the tested drug resistant strains.

Mechanism of Overcoming Resistance by Ceftriaxone-AuNP (Hypothesis)

Fig. 4 shows TEM of P. aeruginosa treated with 3.6 μg/ml Cef-AuNP. Conjugated nanoparticles accumulated both in the cell walls of bacteria and inside the cell themselves. Regarding the resistance-overcoming mechanism in this particular piece of work, we could propose the following hypothesis. The effective concentration of ceftriaxone delivered to the bacterial cell was increased due to its binding to AuNP. This caused two-way damage to bacteria. The first way could be genuinely expected to be due to the increased presence of ceftriaxone molecules per unit volume of the system, that is, the ceftriaxone molecules which remained untouched by the bacterial enzyme. Ceftriaxone works by inhibiting the mucopeptide formation in the bacterial cell wall [35, 36]. The cell membrane disruption caused by the drug results in leakage of the cytoplasmic content, lysis, and death of the bacterial cell. Increased porosity of the membrane contributed to the secondary damage to the cell membrane [17]. Once Cef-AuNP enter the bacteria they easily interrupt all of the membrane’s regulatory functions, effectively inactivating the bioactive blockage of protein synthesis, sulfur containing proteins, and interaction with the phosphorous in the nucleic acid (i.e., RNA and DNA) structure [35, 36].

Figure 4. TEM analysis of P. aeruginosa after exposure to Ceftriaxone-AuNP, and its accumulation in cell wall (A) and inside the cell (B).

Anticancer Activity

The applications of metal nanoparticles in the medical field have been confirmed for the diagnosis and treatment of various types of tumors and other common diseases. AuNP based on biological Rosa damascenes extract molecules are new and have revolutionized the treatment of malignant deposits and do not interfere with the normal cells. In the present study, the cytotoxic effect of AuNP, and Cef-AuNP on MCF-7 human breast cancer cells showed that the biosynthesized AuNP demonstrated cytotoxicity and a direct time-response relationship against the MCF-7 cells. This was also enhanced by increasing the exposure time. The maximum inhibition of growth and decrease in viability appeared in MCF-7 cells treated with AuNP for 72 h at a dose 0.1 μg/ml (as shown in Table 4). This exposure time was selected for further studies. The results obviously reveal that AuNP induce cytotoxicity in the MCF-7 cancer cells in a time dependent manner. This shows that it effectively inhibits the MCF-7 cells growth by 20.3, 33.2, and 48.3% for 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively, while causing the loss of viability.

There were also morphological changes in MCF-7 presented by cell shrinkage, blebbing and pyknotic nuclei when the cell treated with AuNP for 72 h compared to cells treated with Cef-AuNP and a significant decrease in the cellular crowding was seen in comparison to the normal attached MCF-7 human breast cancer cells as shown in Fig. 5. However, a typical apoptotic appearance of MCF-7 breast cancer cells, such as apoptotic bodies, fragmented nuclei, and chromatin condensation, were observed in a time-dependent manner and the changes in appearance were most obvious after 72 h of both treatments. In this concern, Mohseni et al. [37] reported that AuNP were significantly toxic to the MCF-7 cells at the concentration of 2.50 mg/ml and higher and this result was in agreement with the present result. Various studies reported that plant derived AuNP have a potency to control tumor cell growth. The improved AuNP cytotoxic efficacy is due to biological capping composition and other secondary metabolites in the synthesizing medium [38, 39].

Figure 5. Effect of various treatments of biosynthesized gold nanoparticles and Ceftriaxone-AuNP on MCF-7 cells treated for 72 h showing: (1) Morphological changes of MCF-7 cells using inverted microscope (2) DNA fragmentation evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis and (3) Agarose gel electrophoresis of Bax, TNF and GAPDH RT-PCR products.

Table 4 . Effect of AuNP and Cef-AuNP treatment on the proliferative and viability percentage of MCF-7 cultured cells at different exposure times..

Treatment 0.1 µg/mlProliferative percentage of MCF-7 cells at different timesViability % of MCF-7 Cells at different exposure times


24h48 h72 h24h48 h72 h
PBS93.0 ± 1.73 a92.4 ± 0.67 a94.2 ± 3.33 a85.0 ± 1.75 a87.7 ± 1.35 a84.8 ± 1.43 a
AuNPs79.7 ± 1.54 c66.8 ± 2.86 c51.7 ± 2.66 c70.9 ± 1.45 c59.8 ± 1.37 c48.3 ± 1.42 c
Cef-AuNPs85.8 ± 2.34 b80.4 ± 1.73 b73.5 ± 2.14 b78.0 ± 1.38 b74.7 ± 1.9 b69.5 ± 2.33 b

Means with different superscripts (a, b, and c) between groups in the same column are significantly different at p< 0.05. Cell numbers were counted and data are expressed as the percentage of untreated control..



The results displayed that the level of DNA fragmentation became more prominent when the MCF-7 cells treated with AuNP in comparison to control untreated cells (as shown in Figs. 5 and 6); while Cef-AuNP treatment induced a moderate anticancer activity and cytotoxic effects in comparison to the AuNP treated cells. The previous results were confirmed by Selim and Hendi [40] who reported the AuNP possess anticancer activity and cytotoxic effects against MCF-7 cancer cells. The moderate concentration of AuNP stimulated the apoptosis mechanism in the malignant cells [41].

Figure 6. Histograms represent the effect of various treatments of biosynthesized nanoparticles for 72 h on: (A) DNA fragmentation percentage in MCF-7 treated cells (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis of Bax, TNF and GAPDH RT-PCR products in MCF-7 cells after different treatments.

Finally, AuNP were prepared from Rosa damascenes petal extract with a small-sized hexagonal, triangular, and spherical shapes. In this study, we examined the efficacy of using AuNP as ceftriaxone delivery system for the control of multi-drug resistant respiratory tract infections. These Cef-AuNP showed greater antimicrobial activity against ESBL-producing bacteria strains, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii bacteria isolated from the sputum. In this study, antibacterial assays displayed that ceftriaxone after attachment with AuNP got “revived” and ESBL producing bacterial strains which were completely resistant to ceftriaxone turned sensitive to the Cef-AuNP. The ceftriaxone-AuNP might be used as an alternative of antimicrobial agents to ESBL producing bacteria. In future study we will come up with fresh nano-dugs of old antibiotics to control drug resistance bacteria, that is, “regeneration” of old antibiotics so as to keep pace with the decreasing stock of antibiotics. Our data confirmed that biosynthesized AuNP decrease the development of MCF-7 cancer cells in vitro through a remarkable increase in cell apoptosis. AuNP would be an amazing invention in the scope of nanomedicine.

Acknowledgment

We would like to express our gratitude to El-Edwani hospital for providing with us the samples and Taif University for financial support, under the project number (1/437/5264).

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.UV-Vis spectrophotometry analysis of AuNP and Ceftriaxone –AuNP.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2018; 28: 1563-1572https://doi.org/10.4014.jmb/1711.11037

Fig 2.

Figure 2.FTIR analysis of Rosa damascenes petals extracts (A), AuNPs (B), Ceftriaxone (C), and Ceftriaxone –AuNPs (D).
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2018; 28: 1563-1572https://doi.org/10.4014.jmb/1711.11037

Fig 3.

Figure 3.TEM analysis of (A) AuNP and (B) Ceftriaxone-AuNP.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2018; 28: 1563-1572https://doi.org/10.4014.jmb/1711.11037

Fig 4.

Figure 4.TEM analysis of P. aeruginosa after exposure to Ceftriaxone-AuNP, and its accumulation in cell wall (A) and inside the cell (B).
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2018; 28: 1563-1572https://doi.org/10.4014.jmb/1711.11037

Fig 5.

Figure 5.Effect of various treatments of biosynthesized gold nanoparticles and Ceftriaxone-AuNP on MCF-7 cells treated for 72 h showing: (1) Morphological changes of MCF-7 cells using inverted microscope (2) DNA fragmentation evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis and (3) Agarose gel electrophoresis of Bax, TNF and GAPDH RT-PCR products.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2018; 28: 1563-1572https://doi.org/10.4014.jmb/1711.11037

Fig 6.

Figure 6.Histograms represent the effect of various treatments of biosynthesized nanoparticles for 72 h on: (A) DNA fragmentation percentage in MCF-7 treated cells (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis of Bax, TNF and GAPDH RT-PCR products in MCF-7 cells after different treatments.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2018; 28: 1563-1572https://doi.org/10.4014.jmb/1711.11037

Table 1 . Resistance patterns of ESBL-producing bacteria..

Names of isolatesSourceAccession numberAntibiotic resistance profiles
Acinetobacter baumannii ACI1SputumLC325252AK, AMP, AMC, CEC, FOX, FEP, CXM, CAZ, CRO, CTX, CIP, LVX, DO, SXT, CN, MEM, TZP, IPM
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PSE4SputumLC189106AK, AMP, AMC, CEC, FOX, FEP, CXM, CAZ, CRO, CTX, CIP, LVX, DO, SXT, CL, IPM, CN, MEM, CLR, TGC

AK, Amikacin; AMC, Amoxy/Clavulanic acid; CEC, Cefaclor; FEP, Cefepime; CTX, Cefotaxime; FOX, Cefoxitin; CAZ, Ceftazidime; CRO, Ceftriaxone; CXM, Cefuroxime; DO, Doxycycline/HCL; CIP, Ciprofloxacin; LVX, Levofloxacin; CLR, Clarthromycin; AMP, Ampicillin; MEM, Meropenem; SXT, Sulpha/Trimethoprim; TGC, Tigecycline; CN, Gentamicin; IPM, Imipenem; TZP, piperacillin-tazobactam; CL, Chloremphenicol..


Table 2 . Antimicrobial activity of ceftriaxone drug, gold nanoparticles and ceftriaxone–AuNP conjugates..

BacteriaZone of inhibition for 1 µg/mL sample

ceftriaxoneAuNPCeftriaxone-AuNP
Acinetobacter baumannii ACI16 mm6 mm27 mm
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PSE46 mm7 mm29 mm

Table 3 . Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of Ceftriaxone-AuNP against ESBL Positive P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii..

BacteriaCeftriaxoneCeftriaxone-AuNPs

MICMICMBC
Acinetobacter baumannii ACI1>100 µg/mL4 µg/mL16 µg/mL
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PSE4>100 µg/mL3.6 µg/mL16 µg/mL

Table 4 . Effect of AuNP and Cef-AuNP treatment on the proliferative and viability percentage of MCF-7 cultured cells at different exposure times..

Treatment 0.1 µg/mlProliferative percentage of MCF-7 cells at different timesViability % of MCF-7 Cells at different exposure times


24h48 h72 h24h48 h72 h
PBS93.0 ± 1.73 a92.4 ± 0.67 a94.2 ± 3.33 a85.0 ± 1.75 a87.7 ± 1.35 a84.8 ± 1.43 a
AuNPs79.7 ± 1.54 c66.8 ± 2.86 c51.7 ± 2.66 c70.9 ± 1.45 c59.8 ± 1.37 c48.3 ± 1.42 c
Cef-AuNPs85.8 ± 2.34 b80.4 ± 1.73 b73.5 ± 2.14 b78.0 ± 1.38 b74.7 ± 1.9 b69.5 ± 2.33 b

Means with different superscripts (a, b, and c) between groups in the same column are significantly different at p< 0.05. Cell numbers were counted and data are expressed as the percentage of untreated control..


References

  1. Litake GM GV, Niphadkar KB, Joshi SG. 2015. Phenotypic ESBL detection in Acinetobacter baumannii: a real challenge. Am. J. Infect. Dis. 11: 48-53.
    CrossRef
  2. LB R. 2010. Progress and challenges in implementing the research on ESKAPE pathogens. Infect. Control Hospital Epidemiol. 31: S7-S10.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2013. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States. Atlanta. GA.
  4. Paterson DL BR. 2005. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: a clinical update. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18: 657-686.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Mishra SK RB, Pokhrel BM. 2013. Emerging threat of multidrug resistant bugs-Acinetobacter calcoaceticus baumannii complex and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Res. Notes 6: 98-103.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Shaikh S FJ, Shakil S, Rizvi SMD, Kamal MA. 2015. Prevalence of multidrug resistant and extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a tertiary care hospital. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 22: 62-64.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Yares R. 1999. New intervention strategies for reducing antibiotic resistance. Chest 115: 245-275.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Prat CLA. 2016. Bacteria in the respiratory tract-how to treat? Or do not treat? Int. J. Infect. Dis. 51: 113-122.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Sengstock DM TR, Apalara J, Mira A, Chopra T, Kaye KS. 2010. Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: an emerging pathogen among older adults in community hospitals and nursing homes. Clin. Infect. Dis. 50: 1611-1616.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Albrecht MA EC, Raston CL. 2006. Green chemistry and the health implications of nanoparticles. Green Chem. 8: 417-432.
    CrossRef
  11. Arachchige MC RY, Andreev OA. 2015. Advanced targeted nanomedicine. J. Biotechnol. 20: 88-97.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  12. Anand K GR, Phulukdaree A, Chuturgoon A. 2015. Agroforestry waste Moringa oleifera petals mediated green synthesis of gold nanoparticles and their anti-cancer and catalytic activity. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 21: 1105-1111.
    CrossRef
  13. Patil MP KG. 2017. Eco-friendly approach for nanoparticles synthesis and mechanism behind antibacterial activity of silver and anticancer activity of gold nanoparticles. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 101: 79-92.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Raghunandan D RB, Sharanbasava G, Mahesh DB, Harsoor V, Yalagatti MS, Bhagawanraju M, et al. 2011. Anti-cancer studies of noble metal nanoparticles synthesized using different plant extracts. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2: 57-65.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Biju V. 2014. Chemical modifications and bioconjugate reactions of nanomaterials for sensing, imaging, drug delivery and therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43: 737-962.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Demurtas M PC. 2014. Facile one-pot synthesis of amoxicillincoated gold nanoparticles and their antimicrobial activity. Gold Bull. 47: 103-107.
    CrossRef
  17. Cui Y ZY, Tian Y, Zhang W, Lü X, Jiang X. 2012. T he molecular mechanism of action of bactericidal gold nanoparticles on Escherichia coli. Biomaterials 33: 2327-2333.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Gad El-Rab SMF HE, Elzahrani S. 2018. Synthesis of Rifampicin conjugated gold nanoparticled and antimicrobial application against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Res. J. Biotechnol. (In Press).
  19. Garza-Navarro MA A-RJ, Llanas-Vázquez EE, Moreno-Cortez IE, Torres-Castro A, González-González V. 2013. Totally Ecofriendly synthesis of silver nanoparticles from aqueous dissolutions of polysaccharides. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2013: 1-8.
    CrossRef
  20. Yu J XD, Guan HN, Wang C, Huang LK. 2016. Facile onestep green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Citrus maxima aqueous extracts and its catalytic activity. Mater. Lett. 166: 110-112.
    CrossRef
  21. Harshiny M MM, Arthanareeswaran G, Kumaran S, Rajasree S. 2015. Enhancement of antibacterial properties of silver nanoparticles- ceftriaxone conjugate through Mukia maderaspatana leaf extract mediated synthesis. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 121: 135-141.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Shaker MA SM. 2017. Formulation of carbapenems loaded gold nanoparticles to combat multi-antibiotic bacterial resistance: in vitro antibacterial study. Int. J. Pharmaceutics 525: 71-84.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Kanmani P LS. 2013. Synthesis and characterization of pullulan-mediated silver nanoparticles and its antimicrobial activities. Carbohydr. Polym. 97: 421-428.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Pani A LJ, Yun S. 2016. Autoclave mediated one-pot-oneminute synthesis of AgNPs and Au-Ag nanocomposite from Melia azedarach bark extract with antimicrobial activity against food pathogens. Chem. Cent J. 10: 15.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  25. Szende B TE, Trezl L. 2001. Role of arginine and its methylated derivatives in cancer biology and treatment. Cancer Cell Int. 17: 1-3.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  26. Horiuchi N NK, Sasaki Y, Minato K, Fujiwara Y, Nezu K, et al. 1998. In vitro antitumor activity of mitomycin C derivative (RM- 49) and a new anticancer antibiotic (FK973) against lung cancer cell lines determined by tetrazolium dye (MTT) assay. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 22: 246-250.
    CrossRef
  27. Brun ME GS, Girard C, Bouton K, De Massy B, De Sario A. 2006. Characterization and expression analysis during embryo development of the mouse ortholog of MLL3. Gene 371: 25-33.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Hassan AM A-AS, Abdel-Wahhab MA. 2012. Modulation of DNA damage and alteration of gene expression during aflatoxicosis via dietary supplementation of Spirulina (Arthrospira) and whey protein concentrate. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 79: 294-300.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Du J ZZ, Zhang X, Wu S, Xiong J, Wang W, Luo Q. 2017. Biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles by flavonoids from Lilium casa blanca. J. Cluster Sci. 28: 3149-3158.
    CrossRef
  30. Yang N WL, Hao L. 2014. Biosynthesis of Au nanoparticles using agricultural waste mango peel extract and its in-vitro cytotoxic effect on two normal cells. Mat. Lett. 134: 67-70.
    CrossRef
  31. Zaki NM HM. 2012. Enhanced antibacterial effect of ceftriaxone sodium-loaded chitosan nanoparticles against intracellular Salmonella typhimurium. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 13: 411-421.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Shaikh S RS, Shakil S, Hussain T, Alshammari TM, Ahmad W, Tabrez S, et al. 2017. Synthesis and characterization of cefotaxime conjugated gold nanoparticles and their use to target drug-resistant CTX-M-producing bacterial pathogens. J. Cell. Biochem. 9999: 1-7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Alkilany AM MC. 2010. Toxicity and cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles: what we have learned so far? J. Nanoparticle Res. 12: 2313-2333.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Brown AN SK, Samuels TA, Lu J, Obare SO, Scott ME. 2012. Nanoparticles functionalized with ampicillin destroy multipleantibiotic-resistant isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter aerogenes and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78: 2768-2774.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  35. Grace AN PK. 2007. Quinolone antibiotic-capped gold nanoparticles and their antibacterial efficacy against gram positive and gram negative organisms. J. Bionanosci. 1: 96-105.
    CrossRef
  36. Kalita S KR, Sharma KK, Kataki AC, Deka M, Kotoky J. 2016. Amoxicillin functionalized gold nanoparticles reverts MRSA resistance. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 61: 720-727.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  37. Mohseni N SF, Ardestani MS, Kazemi-Lomedasht F, Ghorbani M. 2016. Inhibitory effect of gold nanoparticles conjugated with interferon gamma and methionine on breast cancer cell line. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 6: 173-178.
    CrossRef
  38. Das S DJ, Samadder A, Bhattacharyya SS, Das D, Khuda-Bukhsh AR. 2013. Biosynthesized silver nanoparticles by ethanolic extracts of Phytolacca decandra, Gelsemium sempervirens, Hydrastis canadensis and Thuja occidentalis induce differential cytotoxicity through G2/M arrest in A375 cells. Colloid Surf. B. 101: 325-336.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Raghunandan D BP, Bendegumble B, Bedre MD, Bhagawanraju M, Yalagatti MS. 2011a. Microwave-assisted rapid extracellular biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using carom seed (Trachyspermum copticum) extract and in vitro studies. Am. J. Anal. Chem. 2: 475-483.
    CrossRef
  40. Selim ME HA. 2012. Gold nanoparticles induce apoptosis in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Asian Pacific J. Cancer Prev. 15: 9471-9473.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Dipankar C MS. 2012. The green synthesis, characterization and evaluation of the biological activities of silver nanoparticles synthesized from Iresine herbstii leaf aqueous extracts. Colloid. Surf. B. 98: 112-119.
    Pubmed CrossRef