Articles Service
Research article
Kinetic and Energetic Parameters of Carob Wastes Fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Crabtree Effect, Ethanol Toxicity, and Invertase Repression
1Centre for Marine and Environmental Research, CIMA, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal, 2Faculty of Biology, Department of Microbiology III, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain, 3Institute of Engineering, University of Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015; 25(6): 837-844
Published June 28, 2015 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1408.08015
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Abstract
Keywords
References
- Avallone R, Plessi M, Baraldi M, Monzani A. 1997. Determination of chemical composition of carob (Ceratonia siliqua): protein, fat, carbohydrates and tannins. J. Food Compost. Anal. 10: 166-172.
- Baranyi J, Roberts TA. 1994. A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 23:277-294.
- Brown SW, Oliver SG, Harrison DEF, Righelato RC. 1981. Ethanol inhibition of yeast growth and fermentation: differences in the magnitude and complexity of the effect. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 11: 151-155.
- Cazetta ML, Celligoi MAPC, Buzato JB, Scarmino IS. 2007. Fermentation of molasses by Zymomonas mobilis: effects of temperature and sugar concentration on ethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 98: 2824-2828.
- Forbes C, O’Reilly C, McLaughlin L, Gilleran G, Tuohy M, Colleran E. 2009. Application of high rate, high temperature anaerobic digestion to fungal thermozyme hydrolysates from carbohydrate wastes. Water Res. 43: 2531-2539.
- Lima-Costa ME, Tavares C, Raposo S, Rodrigues B, Peinado JM. 2012. Kinetics of sugars consumption and ethanol inhibition in carob pulp fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch and fed-batch cultures. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 39: 789-797.
- Meijer MM, Boonstra J, Verkleij AJ, Verrips CT. 1998. Glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is related to the glucose concentration rather than the glucose flux. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 24102-24107.
- Mishra J, Kumar D, Samanta S, Vishwakarma MK. 2012. A comparative study of ethanol production from various agro residues by using Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans. J. Yeast Fungal Res. 3: 12-17.
- Mormeneo S, Sentandreu R. 1982. Regulation of invertase synthesis by glucose in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Fed. Eur. Biochem. Soc. J. 152: 14-18.
- Mussato SI, Dragone G, Guimarães PMR, Silva JPA, Carneiro LM, Roberto IC, et al. 2010. Technological trends, global market, and challenges of bio-ethanol production. Biotechnol. Adv. 28: 817-830.
- Raamsdonk LM, Diderich JA, Kuiper A, Gaalen M, Kruckberg AL, Berden JA, Dam K. 2001. Co-consumption of sugars or ethanol and glucose in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain deleted in the HXK2 gene. Yeast 18: 1023-1033 .
- Raposo S, Pardão JM, Díaz I, Lima-Costa ME. 2009. Kinetic modelling of bioethanol production using agro-industrial by-products. Int. J. Energy Environ. 3: 1-8.
- Santo DE, Galego L, Gonçalves T, Quintas C. 2012. Yeast diversity in the Mediterranean strawberry tree (Arbutus unedo L.) fruits’ fermentations. Food Res. Int. 47: 45-50.
- Santos J, Sousa MJ, Cardoso H, Inácio J, Silva S, SpencerMartins I, Leão C. 2008. Ethanol tolerance of sugar transport, and the rectification of stuck wine fermentations. Microbiology 154: 422-430.
- Santos M, Teixeira J, Rodrigues A. 2005. Production of dextran and fructose from carob extract and cheese whey by Leuconostoc mesenteroides NRRL B512(f). Biochem. Eng. J. 25: 1-6.
- Takeshige K, Ouchi K. 1995. Effects of yeast invertase on ethanol production in molasses. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 79: 513-515.
- Thongchul N, Navankasattusas S, Yang ST. 2010. Production of lactic acid and ethanol by Rhizopus oryzae integrated with cassava pulp hydrolysis. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 33: 407-416.
- Vaheed H, Shojaosadati SA, Galip H. 2011. Evaluation and optimization of ethanol production from carob pod extract by Zymomonas mobilis using response surface methodology. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38: 101-111.
- Zhao XQ, Bai FW. 2009. Mechanisms of yeast stress tolerance and its manipulation for efficient fuel ethanol production. J. Biotechnol. 144: 23-30.
Related articles in JMB
Article
Research article
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015; 25(6): 837-844
Published online June 28, 2015 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1408.08015
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Kinetic and Energetic Parameters of Carob Wastes Fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Crabtree Effect, Ethanol Toxicity, and Invertase Repression
B. Rodrigues 1, J. M. Peinado 2, S. Raposo 1, A. Constantino 1, C. Quintas 3 and M. E. Lima-Costa 1*
1Centre for Marine and Environmental Research, CIMA, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal, 2Faculty of Biology, Department of Microbiology III, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain, 3Institute of Engineering, University of Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
Abstract
Carob waste is a useful raw material for the second-generation ethanol because 50% of its dry
weight is sucrose, glucose, and fructose. To optimize the process, we have studied the
influence of the initial concentration of sugars on the fermentation performance of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae. With initial sugar concentrations (S0) of 20 g/l, the yeasts were
derepressed and the ethanol produced during the exponential phase was consumed in a
diauxic phase. The rate of ethanol consumption decreased with increasing S0 and disappeared
at 250 g/l when the Crabtree effect was complete and almost all the sugar consumed was
transformed into ethanol with a yield factor of 0.42 g/g. Sucrose hydrolysis was delayed at
high S0 because of glucose repression of invertase synthesis, which was triggered at
concentrations above 40 g/l. At S0 higher than 250 g/l, even when glucose had been
exhausted, sucrose was hydrolyzed very slowly, probably due to an inhibition at this low
water activity. Although with lower metabolic rates and longer times of fermentation, 250 g/l
is considered the optimal initial concentration because it avoids the diauxic consumption of
ethanol and maintains enough invertase activity to consume all the sucrose, and also avoids
the inhibitions due to lower water activities at higher S0.
Keywords: Bioethanol, Carob pod, Fermentation, Invertase synthesis, Saccharomyces, 2nd generation biofuels
References
- Avallone R, Plessi M, Baraldi M, Monzani A. 1997. Determination of chemical composition of carob (Ceratonia siliqua): protein, fat, carbohydrates and tannins. J. Food Compost. Anal. 10: 166-172.
- Baranyi J, Roberts TA. 1994. A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 23:277-294.
- Brown SW, Oliver SG, Harrison DEF, Righelato RC. 1981. Ethanol inhibition of yeast growth and fermentation: differences in the magnitude and complexity of the effect. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 11: 151-155.
- Cazetta ML, Celligoi MAPC, Buzato JB, Scarmino IS. 2007. Fermentation of molasses by Zymomonas mobilis: effects of temperature and sugar concentration on ethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 98: 2824-2828.
- Forbes C, O’Reilly C, McLaughlin L, Gilleran G, Tuohy M, Colleran E. 2009. Application of high rate, high temperature anaerobic digestion to fungal thermozyme hydrolysates from carbohydrate wastes. Water Res. 43: 2531-2539.
- Lima-Costa ME, Tavares C, Raposo S, Rodrigues B, Peinado JM. 2012. Kinetics of sugars consumption and ethanol inhibition in carob pulp fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch and fed-batch cultures. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 39: 789-797.
- Meijer MM, Boonstra J, Verkleij AJ, Verrips CT. 1998. Glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is related to the glucose concentration rather than the glucose flux. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 24102-24107.
- Mishra J, Kumar D, Samanta S, Vishwakarma MK. 2012. A comparative study of ethanol production from various agro residues by using Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans. J. Yeast Fungal Res. 3: 12-17.
- Mormeneo S, Sentandreu R. 1982. Regulation of invertase synthesis by glucose in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Fed. Eur. Biochem. Soc. J. 152: 14-18.
- Mussato SI, Dragone G, Guimarães PMR, Silva JPA, Carneiro LM, Roberto IC, et al. 2010. Technological trends, global market, and challenges of bio-ethanol production. Biotechnol. Adv. 28: 817-830.
- Raamsdonk LM, Diderich JA, Kuiper A, Gaalen M, Kruckberg AL, Berden JA, Dam K. 2001. Co-consumption of sugars or ethanol and glucose in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain deleted in the HXK2 gene. Yeast 18: 1023-1033 .
- Raposo S, Pardão JM, Díaz I, Lima-Costa ME. 2009. Kinetic modelling of bioethanol production using agro-industrial by-products. Int. J. Energy Environ. 3: 1-8.
- Santo DE, Galego L, Gonçalves T, Quintas C. 2012. Yeast diversity in the Mediterranean strawberry tree (Arbutus unedo L.) fruits’ fermentations. Food Res. Int. 47: 45-50.
- Santos J, Sousa MJ, Cardoso H, Inácio J, Silva S, SpencerMartins I, Leão C. 2008. Ethanol tolerance of sugar transport, and the rectification of stuck wine fermentations. Microbiology 154: 422-430.
- Santos M, Teixeira J, Rodrigues A. 2005. Production of dextran and fructose from carob extract and cheese whey by Leuconostoc mesenteroides NRRL B512(f). Biochem. Eng. J. 25: 1-6.
- Takeshige K, Ouchi K. 1995. Effects of yeast invertase on ethanol production in molasses. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 79: 513-515.
- Thongchul N, Navankasattusas S, Yang ST. 2010. Production of lactic acid and ethanol by Rhizopus oryzae integrated with cassava pulp hydrolysis. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 33: 407-416.
- Vaheed H, Shojaosadati SA, Galip H. 2011. Evaluation and optimization of ethanol production from carob pod extract by Zymomonas mobilis using response surface methodology. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38: 101-111.
- Zhao XQ, Bai FW. 2009. Mechanisms of yeast stress tolerance and its manipulation for efficient fuel ethanol production. J. Biotechnol. 144: 23-30.