Articles Service
Research article
Effects of Pseudomonas aureofaciens 63-28 on Defense Responses in Soybean Plants Infected by Rhizoctonia solani
1Division of Applied Bioscience and Biotechnology, Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Korea, 2Department of Plant Science, Macdonald Campus of McGill University, 21,111 Lakeshore Road, St. Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec H9X 3V9, Canada
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011; 21(4): 379-386
Published April 28, 2011 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1012.12001
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Abstract
Keywords
Related articles in JMB
Article
Research article
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011; 21(4): 379-386
Published online April 28, 2011 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1012.12001
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Effects of Pseudomonas aureofaciens 63-28 on Defense Responses in Soybean Plants Infected by Rhizoctonia solani
Woo-Jin Jung 1, Ro-Dong Park 1, Fazli Mabood 2, Alfred Souleimanov 2 and Donald L. Smith 2*
1Division of Applied Bioscience and Biotechnology, Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 500-757, Korea, 2Department of Plant Science, Macdonald Campus of McGill University, 21,111 Lakeshore Road, St. Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec H9X 3V9, Canada
Abstract
The objective of this work was to investigate the ability of
the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas
aureofaciens 63-28 to induce plant defense systems,
including defense-related enzyme levels and expression of
defense-related isoenzymes, and isoflavone production,
leading to improved resistance to the phytopathogen
Rhizoctonia solani AG-4 in soybean seedlings. Seven-dayold
soybean seedlings were inoculated with P. aureofaciens
63-28, R. solani AG-4, or P. aureofaciens 63-28 plus R.
solani AG-4 (P+R), or not inoculated (control). After 7
days of incubation, roots treated with R. solani AG-4 had
obvious damping-off symptoms, but P+R-treated soybean
plants had less disease development, indicating suppression
of R. solani AG-4 in soybean seedlings. Superoxide
dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activities of R. solani
AG-4-treated roots increased by 24.6% and 54.0%,
respectively, compared with control roots. Ascorbate
peroxidase (APX) and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL)
activities of R. solani AG-4-treated roots were increased by
75.1% and 23.6%, respectively. Polyphenol oxidase (PPO)
activity in soybean roots challenged with P. aureofaciens
63-28 and P+R increased by 25.0% and 11.6%, respectively.
Mn-SOD (S1 band on gel) and Fe-SOD (S2) were strongly
induced in P+R-treated roots, whereas one CAT (C1) and
one APX (A3) were strongly induced in R. solani AG-4-
treated roots. The total isoflavone concentration in P+Rtreated
shoots was 27.2% greater than the control treatment.
The isoflavone yield of R. solani AG-4-treated shoots was
60.9% less than the control.
Keywords: Defense enzymes, isoflavones, Pseudomonas aureofaciens, Rhizoctonia solani, Soybean