Articles Service
Research article
Isolation and Characterization of Multi-Trait Plant Growth-Promoting Endophytic Bacteria from Scots Pine Tissues
1Ukrainian National Forestry University, 103 Gen Chuprynky Str., Lviv 79057, Ukraine
2Institute of Cell Biology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 14/16 Drahomanova Str., Lviv 79005, Ukraine
3Sudova Vyshnya Lyceum Named after Tadei Dmytrasevych, Lviv Region, Ukraine
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2025. 35: e2408056
Published January 15, 2025 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2408.08056
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Abstract
Keywords
Graphical Abstract

Introduction
Plants are closely associated with a myriad of microorganisms, including protists, fungi, and bacteria, which together form their microbiome. The vast majority of plants on Earth are colonized by endophytes [1], and a plant without endophytes is a rare exception in nature [2]. Endophytic bacteria benefit plants by promoting growth, suppressing pathogens, enhancing stress resistance, and boosting immunity [3]. Since they share ecological niches with phytopathogens, endophytes can help protect plants from harmful microbes [4].
Bacterial endophytes similar to plant growth-promoting rizobacteria can directly promote plant growth through the production of phytohormones (indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid, etc.), phosphate solubilization, nitrogen fixation, siderophore, hydrogen cyanide (HCN), and ammonia production [5-8]. They also contribute indirectly by suppressing disease by producing antibiotics and secondary metabolites, inducing systemic resistance, protecting against pests, and performing metal bioremediation to aid growth in contaminated soils [9-11].
Endophytic bacteria have been isolated from various plant parts, including roots, stems, leaves, and seeds in multiple plant species [5], with genera such as
Most of our knowledge about bacterial endophytic microbiomes comes from studies on crop plants and the model species
Several studies examining the endophyte microbiome in conifer trees have have identified various bacterial genera within the pine holobiont. For instance,
Scots pine is a widespread species of pine that grows naturally over a large area of Eurasia. It is a pioneer species, frost- and drought-tolerant, capable of growing in very poor soils, and can be found in many different environments [26]. However, climate fluctuations negatively affect its photosynthesis, growth [27], and resistance to pests and fungal pathogens [28, 29]. Recent research shows that plant microbiomes can help mitigate these impacts by enhancing nutrition, growth, defense against pathogens, and tolerance to abiotic stresses [30].
Among plant beneficial endophytic bacteria,
Scots pine is a long-lived plant that experiences significant fluctuations in climatic conditions during its ontogeny and inhabits areas with poor soils. Therefore, the search for strains of endophytic bacteria from Scots pine with PGP abilities is promising for sustaining the growth of pine trees under nutrient-poor edaphic conditions in the context of global climate change.
This research aimed to investigate the PGP capabilities of
Materials and Methods
Biological Material
For endophytic bacteria isolation, samples were collected from healthy Scots pine trees located at Sudova Vyshnya forestry (49°48'19.0''N 23°22'27.9''E) in the Lviv region of Ukraine. A sterilized knife was used to cut pine tissues from under the bark of the trunk, which were then placed in plastic bags. The samples were transported to the laboratory in an ice cooler box and used for bacterial isolation within 24 h. Scots pine seeds were gathered from trees in the same region in February and stored at +4°C in the dark.
The fungal cultures of
Endophytic Bacteria Isolation
Pieces of Scots pine wood were thoroughly washed with tap water. They were then surface-sterilized by dipping them into 70% (v/v) ethanol for 5 min, followed by treatment with a 5% (v/v) aqueous solution of sodium hypochlorite for 5 min. Finally, the wood pieces were rinsed twice with autoclaved distilled water [22]. The success of sterilization was assessed by plating an aliquot of the final wash onto LB agar, incubating it at 30°C for 24-72 h, and checking for microbial growth on the surface of the nutrient medium.
The sterilized wood pieces were cut into small fragments under aseptic conditions and placed on the surface of LB-agar Petri dishes. The plates were incubated at 30°C and checked daily for bacterial growth. The bacterial colonies that appeared were then picked up and re-plated on fresh LB agar medium to obtain pure cultures. The bacterial strains were stored as 30% glycerol stocks at −20°C for further analysis.
The isolated strains were grouped according to colony morphology, cell shape, growth rate, and Gram reaction. Rod-shaped, motile, gram-negative bacteria were selected for further identification. The biochemical characteristics of the selected isolates were tested using standard methods [39]. To screen for antibiotic susceptibility, the isolates were grown on nutrient agar with a range of antibiotics, including ampicillin (100 μg/ml), streptomycin (50 μg/ml), tetracycline (5 μg/ml), kanamycin (15 μg/ml), rifampicin (10 μg/ml), and nalidixic acid (20 μg/ml). Four bacterial strains were selected for molecular identification.
Molecular Identification of Endophytic Bacteria
The bacterial isolates P57, P77, P88, and P10-1 were grown on LB agar for 72 h at 30°C. Bacterial genomic DNA was isolated using a QIAamp DNA Kit (Qiagen). Amplification of the 16S rRNA gene was performed using the universal primer pairs 8F (5’-AGAGTTTGATYMTGGCTCAG-3’) and 1510R (5’-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3’)[40, 41]. The PCR products were sent to Explogen LLC (EXG, Lviv, Ukraine) for Sanger sequencing.
To identify the closest taxa, the 16S rRNA sequences were aligned with those from the National Center for Biotechnology Information nucleotide nr/nt (non-redundant nucleotide) database using the BLASTN algorithm (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) and submitted to the GenBank database to obtain accession numbers. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood method with MEGA version 11 software [42], specifically designed for the 16S rRNA sequences, to determine the phylogenetic position of the isolates.
PGP Properties Screening
Nitrogen Fixation Capability
Molecular nitrogen fixation was tested on nitrogen-free medium, such as Ashby-sucrose agar [43] and Nfb (nitrogen-free bromothymol blue) semi-solid medium [44, 45]. The Ashby medium was inoculated by streaking from bacterial cultures, and incubating at 30°C for 5 days, until bacterial growth was observed. The cultures were then successively passaged twice to confirm strain growth. Any growth on the medium indicated the bacteria's ability to fix nitrogen.
The NFb-medium was used for visual detection of nitrogen-fixing activity in bacterial strains. The test involved growing 1 ml of bacterial suspension (108 CFU/ml) in 9 ml of Nfb semi-solid media. Nitrogen-fixing ability of isolates P57, P77, P88, and P10-1 was indicated by a color change, turning blue or dark blue after 48 h of incubation.
Phosphate Solubilization
The phosphate-solubilizing abilities of the tested isolates were measured on Pikovskaya agar (PVK) medium [46]. Briefly, 5 μl of a fresh suspension of each isolate (108 CFU/ml) was spotted onto a PVK agar plate and incubated at 30°C. The phosphate solubilization potential of the isolate was indicated by the formation of a halo zone surrounding the sites of bacterial colonies. The phosphate solubilization index (PSI) was calculated after 5 days of incubation as follows [47]:
PSI = (colony diameter + halo zone diameter) / colony diameter
Indole Acetic Acid (IAA) Production
The
Y=0.0208x+0.1196, R2=0.9648.
Ammonia Production Assay
The ammonia production was revealed using a spectrophotometric quantification assay with addition of Nessler’s reagent [51]. The bacterial strains were pre-grown in LB medium for 24 h at 30°C. Half a milliliter of the bacterial supernatant was mixed with 1 ml of Nessler’s reagent in test tubes previously washed with ultrapure water. The reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature (25°C) for 10 min, then diluted 6x to a final volume of 9 ml [52]. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a ULAB 102-UV UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The ammonia concentration was calculated using a standard curve of ammonium sulfate (NH4)2SO4 solution in μM (ranging from 0.5 to 40 mM).
Siderophore Production
The siderophore-producing potential of bacterial strains was investigated on Chrome Azurol S agar plates [53]. An aliquot (5 μl) of overnight bacterial culture was placed on the surface of a Chrome azurol-S agar plate. The plates were incubated at 30°C for 7 days, and then observed for the formation of an orange or yellow halo zone around the colonies. The siderophore production index (SPI) was calculated as follows [54]:
SPI = (color conversion area + colony diameter) / colony diameter
Production of Hydrogen Cyanide (HCN)
Hydrogen cyanide production by the bacterial strains was performed using HCN-sensitive paper [55, 56]. Fifty microliters of bacterial culture were swabbed onto nutrient agar supplemented with filter-sterilized glycine (4.4 g/l). A piece of Whatman paper impregnated with a sodium picrate solution (0.5% picric acid and 2% sodium carbonate) was placed in the lid of a Petri dish. The Petri dishes were then sealed with parafilm and incubated at 30°C for 10 days. HCN production by the isolated strains was indicated by a shift in the paper color from yellow to orange-brown.
In Vitro Antifungal Activity Assay
The antifungal activity of isolated endophytic bacteria against the fungi
Inhibition efficiency (%) = (C – T)/C × 100%
where C = Colony growth in control, T = Colony growth in dual culture.
PGP Assay in Planta
Laboratory Experiment
Fifty microliters of fresh cultures of the bacterial strains
For fourteen-day-old pine seedlings, the following biometric characteristics were assessed: [60]:
● Total seedling length: Measured in centimeters using a ruler.
● Germination percentage (GP): Calculated for each treatment as a percentage of total germinated seeds.
● GP = (number of germinated seeds / numbers of total seeds for bioassay) ×100%
● Seed vigor index (SVI): Calculated by multiplying seed germination (%) and seedling length (cm).
● SVI = germination percentage (GP) × means of seedling length (cm)
Field Experiment
The experiment was conducted from May 2022 to June 2024 at the Botanical Garden of the National Forestry University of Ukraine (Lviv, Ukraine). The field plot used in the experiment was 2 m wide and 9 m long. The plot was divided into three sectors based on treatments, which were located 1.5 m apart. The soil texture was sandy loam.
Sterilization of Scots pine seeds and their treatment with bacterial strains P57 or P88 were carried out as described in the 'Laboratory experiment' section. Following treatment, the seeds from both the control and inoculated groups were rinsed with 0.5 liters of sterile distilled water, and excess moisture was subsequently removed using filter paper. Control and inoculated Scots pine seeds were sown in wet soil at a depth of 1-1.5 cm. Three rows of 160 pine seeds each were sown in each sector. The distance between the rows was 50 cm. The percentage of germination for each group of seedlings was assessed on the 35th day after sowing. After counting the germlings in each group, they were watered with the corresponding bacterial suspension (107 CFU/ml) or distilled water for the control group, with a consumption of 0.5 liters of suspension per linear meter. Watering was carried out in moist soil under the seedlings. In the first year of seedling growth, two similar waterings were performed at monthly interval. In the second year of growth, no watering with the tested bacterial cultures was conducted, and the seedlings grew under natural moisturizing. The growth parameters of Scots pine seedlings were measured 5 months and 2 years after sowing. The length of aerial part and root; their fresh and dry weights, and root collar diameter were examined for 10 random seedlings from each row.
Colonization Assays
Seed Attachment Assays
Scots pine seeds were surface-sterilized by immersion in 70% ethanol for 1 min, followed by 20 min in 0.1%sodium hypochlorite, and then washed four times with sterile distilled water. The effectiveness of seed surface sterilization was assessed by placing sterilized seeds on Petri dishes containing LB agar, incubated at 30°C, and checking for bacterial growth after 24 h. Sterilized seeds (
For qualitative adhesion assays, inoculated and control washed seeds were transferred onto filter paper previously moistened with distilled water under aseptic conditions for germination. After the seed coat ruptured and the primary root appeared, the seeds were transferred to Petri dishes containing King's B agar, modified by adding L-glutamine instead of peptone (King's BS agar) [62], supplemented with ampicillin (100 μg/ml), to detect fluorescent
For the quantitative assays, bacterial incubation with the seeds and the washing procedures were performed as described above. One seed was placed in a sterile homogenizer, covered with 1 ml of sterile 0.9% NaCl, and ground until fully homogenized. Serial dilutions of the resulting homogenates were plated (0.05 ml aliquots) on King's BS agar amended with ampicillin (100 μg/ml). The Petri dishes were incubated at 30°C, and the colony-forming units (CFU) of each seed were evaluated after 24 h. Each assay was repeated at least three times.
Endophytic Colonization Assay
To evaluate endophytic colonization, two randomly selected seedlings from each row, for a total of six per treatment, were harvested two years and five months after sowing (September, 2024). The seedlings were removed from the ground and gently shaken to remove loosely adhering soil from the roots. Seedlings were thoroughly washed under tap water. From each seedling, fragments of the root, stem, and needles were taken, and their surfaces were sterilized by immersion in 1.3% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min, followed by three washes with sterile distilled water [37]. After surface sterilization of the tissue samples (1 g), excess moisture was removed using sterile filter paper. The samples were then cut into approximately 0.05 cm segments using a sterile scalpel. These segments were immersed in Falcon tubes containing 10 ml of sterile 0.9% NaCl and shaken at 28°C and 180 rpm for 30 min [63]. Next, serial dilutions of the resulting suspension were plated (0.05 ml aliquots) on King's BS agar supplemented with ampicillin (100 μg/ml). The Petri dishes were incubated at 30°C, and the CFU for each strain per gram of fresh tissue were evaluated after 7 days.
Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers
The bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences were deposited in the GenBank nucleotide sequence database under the following accession numbers: OR592462.1 (
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted using Python with the ‘scipy.stats’ library for performing
Results
Isolation of Endophytic Bacteria from Scots Pine Stem
This study found that Scots pine hosts a variety of culturable endophytic bacteria, with 64 isolates obtained from stem tissues. Among these, 21 Gram-negative isolates underwent further analysis, and four strains—P57, P77, P88, and P10-1—were preliminarily identified as
Isolate P57, a fluorescent bacterium, was Gram-negative, rod-shaped, motile, and non-spore-forming, with positive results for catalase, oxidase, and oxidative metabolism, but negative for starch and gelatin hydrolysis, nitrate reduction, and protease. It showed resistance to ampicillin and nalidixic acid.
Isolate P77, a non-fluorescent bacterium, exhibited similar characteristics but was oxidase-negative and protease-positive, with the ability to hydrolyze gelatin. It was resistant to ampicillin and kanamycin.
Isolates P88 and P10-1 had comparable features, being Gram-negative, non-spore-forming rods producing a yellow-green pigment. They tested positive for catalase, oxidase, protease, and gelatinase, but negative for starch hydrolysis and nitrate reduction. Both were resistant to ampicillin, rifampicin, and nalidixic acid.
16S rRNA Identification of Bacterial Isolates
The species identification of the isolated bacterial strains was determined by sequencing the 16S rRNA gene. The nucleotide sequences of the investigated strains were identified as members of the phylum
-
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic trees constructed using the maximum likelihood method using MEGA 11 software for the 16S rRNA sequences of bacterial strains. Squares represent bacterial strains in this study.
PGP Potential of Endophytic Bacteria
The study assessed nitrogen fixation, ammonification, IAA production, phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, and HCN production capabilities of four bacterial strains:
-
Fig. 2. Assessment of the plant growth promotion abilities of the bacterial isolates from Scots pine tissues
P. putida P57,S. maltophilia P77,P. lurida P88, and P10-1. (A) Nitrogen fixation in NFb medium. (B) Ammonia production. (C) IAA production. (D) Phosphate solubilization. (E) Siderophore production. (F) HCN production.
Antifungal Activity against B. cinerea and F. sporotrichiella
The antifungal activity of
-
Fig. 3. Antifungal activity of the bacterial strains
P. putida P57,S. maltophilia P77,P. lurida P88, and P10-1 againstB. cinerea andF. sporotrichiella . The activity was tested using a dual culture assay. Fungal growth inhibition zones are indicated by arrows.
Effect on Scots Pine Seedling Growth
Laboratory Experiment
The comparison between growth parameters of noninoculated and inoculated Scots pine seedlings obtained from the laboratory experiments is presented in Table 1. Pre-sowing treatment of pine seeds with bacterial suspension of the Р88 strain did not have a significant effect GP value compared to control group; the other three strains reduced the number of germinated seeds by 5-8%, depending on the strain. Conversely, seed bacterization increased the total length of seedlings, with a 14% increase observed for strain P57. It also had a positive effect on viability of seedlings (SVI), particularly for strains
-
Table 1 . Effect inoculation of endophytic bacteria from Scots pine on growth parameters of 14-day-old
P. sylvestris (L.) seedlings (laboratory experiment).
Field Experiment
Two bacterial strains of the genus
Visual examination of five-month-old seedlings revealed changes in the morphology of their root systems compared to the control group, including increased root length, branching, enhanced lateral root formation (Fig. 4A) and improved root mycorrhization (Fig. 4B). The root length in inoculated seedlings increased by 58%for both strains compared to the control (Fig. 4D). There were no significant differences in shoot length between the control and P57-inoculated seedlings, while treatment with P88 resulted in a 20.7% increase (Fig. 4C). Bacterial inoculation significantly affected the dry biomass of seedlings with dry weight increasing by 82 % for
-
Fig. 4. Effect of
P. putida P57 andP. lurida P88 on the morphology (A) and mycorrhization (×20 magnification) (B) of root systems of 5-month-old seedlings and their growth parameters: shoot length (C), root length (D), and dry weights of seedlings (E). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences atp ≤ 0.05,n = 30. Error bars indicate ± SD.
The effects of seed inoculation were also assessed in two-year-old Scots pine seedlings grown under field conditions (Fig. 5A). The root system morphology differences seen in five-month-old seedlings persisted in the two-year-old plants (Fig. 5A). Inoculated plants exhibited significant growth parameter increases compared to the control. Specifically, seedlings treated with P57 and P88 were 35.3% and 43.7% taller than the control, respectively (Fig. 5C). The root collar diameter also increased significantly, with P57 and P88 exhibiting increases of 29.6% and 31.4%, respectively (Fig. 5B). The dry weight of the aerial part of inoculated plants was double that of non-inoculated ones, measuring 4.87 ± 0.4 g for control plants, 9.59 ± 0.75 g for
-
Fig. 5. Growth parameters of 2-year-old
P. sylvestris seedlings inoculated with bacterial suspensionsP. putida P57 andP. lurida P88. (A) Noninoculated and inoculated 2-year-old Scots pine seedlings. (B) Root collar diameter. (C) Aerial part height. (D, E) Fresh and dry weight of aerial parts. Bars with the same letter for each compared parameter did not differ significantly atp ≤ 0.05,n = 30. Error bars indicate ± SD.
Seed and Endophytic Colonization Study
The qualitative and quantitative seed attachment assays indicated adhesion of both bacterial strains, P57 and P88, to the surface of inoculated seeds. As shown in Fig. S1, fluorescent bacteria were primarily localized around the radicle of the germinating inoculated seeds. No growth of fluorescent bacteria was detected around noninoculated seeds. Furthermore, the concentration of P88 bacteria attached to the seed surface was 20 times higher than that of P57 (Table 2). Similarly, a greater number of
-
Table 2 . Colonization of seeds and Scots pine tissues under inoculation with
Pseudomonas strains.
Discussion
In this study, we isolated endophytic bacteria from the Scots pine stem tissues and tested their growth promotion and antifungal potential
Four bacterial isolates—P57, P77, P88, and P10-1—exhibited morphological and physiological characteristics typical of the genus
The isolate P77 was identified as
Isolates P88 and P10-1 were identified as
All the strains isolated in this study likely possess plant growth-promoting properties, as similar bacterial species have shown such traits in other plants [83]. Given that strains within the same species can exhibit varied metabolic and functional profiles due to genomic differences [84], studying these new strains offers valuable insights and broadens our understanding of the potential of well-known bacterial species.
The isolates P57, P77, P88, and P10-1 were tested
-
Table 3 . Plant growth-promoting features of endophytic bacterial strains from Scots pine.
Numerous studies show that endophytic bacteria promote plant growth by enhancing nutrient uptake, including nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium [91]. Atmospheric nitrogen (N2) is inaccessible to most organisms, but diazotrophic bacteria convert it through biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) [92, 93]. In our study, all isolates—P57, P77, P88, and P10-1—grew on nitrogen-free media (Ashby and Nfb), suggesting nitrogen-fixing capabilities. The highest potential for nitrogen fixation on Nfb semi-solid medium was demonstrated by
Ammonia production is an important characteristic of the PGP trait that influences growth and can aid in biocontrol against pathogens. In the current study, all four strains showed the ability to convert organic nitrogen from peptone into ammonia, as illustrated in Fig. 2B. Notably,
Phosphorus is one of the most important nutrient elements for plants. Despite the presence of phosphorus compounds in agricultural soils, most exist in an insoluble form [103]. Among the tested strains, only
Siderophore production is an important characteristic of plant-associated microorganisms, indicating their ability to improve the bioavailability of iron to plants through their chelating properties, thereby positively influencing the growth of the host organism. In this study, all four bacterial strains exhibited siderophore production. The fluorescent strains P57, P88, and P10-1 likely synthesize pyoverdine, a known siderophore of
In addition to siderophores, endophytic bacteria can antagonize phytopathogens by producing hydrogen cyanide. In the current study, none of the isolates produced HCN. However, HCN absence did not affect their biocontrol abilities, as they utilized other pathogen inhibition mechanisms [89]. In dual culture tests, all strains inhibited the growth of the phytopathogen
The PGP abilities of isolates P57, P77, P88, and P10-1
The germination experiment results were validated in a two-year field trial using two strains, P57 and P88, which showed the best PGP results
Inoculation outcomes were assessed at three stages: germination rate on the 35th day after sowing, growth parameters after five months, and two years later. Unlike lab results, field trials showed increased seedling numbers with strain P57 (54% increase) and P88 (41% increase). Seed germination under natural conditions is one of the most vulnerable stages in plant ontogenesis. Once the seed coat is disrupted, the germinating embryo encounters soil microbiota, including soil-borne pathogens. It can be assumed that the improved germination of inoculated seedlings may be attributed to the biocontrol properties of these bacteria, as demonstrated in this study. Previous research has highlighted the biocontrol activity of
Bacterial inoculation significantly improved root system development of five-month-old Scots pine seedlings compared to noninoculated seedlings, resulting in longer and more branched roots for both strains (Fig. 4). However, while no significant shoot length difference was found between seedlings inoculated with P57 and control, inoculation with P88 increased shoot length by 20.7%. The treatment also enhanced biomass of inoculated seedlings due to the more developed root systems. This effect is likely attributed to the influence of exogenous IAA, which stimulates the formation of lateral and adventitious roots [115]. Similarly,
Inoculation with
Endophytic colonization appears to be a key factor in growth promotion. Greenhouse trials show that the size of the bacterial population directly correlates with the effectiveness of growth enhancement in conifers like spruce, lodgepole pine, and Chinese red pine [24, 37, 63]. Puri
The initial phase of colonization involves bacterial adhesion to the seed, which is essential for root colonization [118, 119]. In a quantitative seed attachment assay, both tested strains adhered to the seed coat, with
The endophytic population sizes of strains P57 and P88 in the roots and stems were significantly lower (tens to hundreds of times) than those reported for other PGP bacteria in inoculated conifers under controlled conditions [37, 63, 120]. This is likely due to natural field conditions with various biotic and abiotic stresses. Shishido and Chanway [121] observed a 10- to 100-fold reduction in PGPR populations in spruce seedlings following a transition from greenhouse to field conditions, citing the harsher field environment as the cause. Despite reduced population sizes, significant growth promotion (up to 234%) was noted in spruce.
In this study, two-year-old pine seedlings inoculated with
Detection of
Conclusion
The findings indicate that
This research represents one of the few long-term studies to successfully apply endophytic
Supplemental Materials
Acknowledgments
This article is based on work supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Ukraine (project 2021.01/0184). This work was partially supported by a grant from the Simons Foundation ([award 1030281],[VAK]).
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
References
- Smith SA, Tank DC, Boulanger LA, Bascom-Slack CA, Eisenman K, Kingery D,
et al . 2008. Bioactive endophytes warrant intensified exploration and conservation.PLoS One 3 : e3052. - Partida-Martínez LP, Heil M. 2011. The microbe-free plant: fact or artifact?
Front. Plant Sci. 2 : 100. - Omomowo OI, Babalola OO. 2019. Bacterial and fungal endophytes: tiny giants with immense beneficial potential for plant growth and sustainable agricultural productivity.
Microorganisms 7 : 481. - Liotti RG, da Silva Figueiredo MI, da Silva GF, de Mendonça EAF, Soares MA. 2018. Diversity of cultivable bacterial endophytes in
Paullinia cupana and their potential for plant growth promotion and phytopathogen control.Microbiol. Res. 207 : 8-18. - Santoyo G, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, del Carmen O-M, Glick BR. 2016. Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes.
Microbiol. Res. 183 : 92-99. - Ismail MA, Amin MA, Eid AM, Hassan SE, Mahgoub HAM, Lashin I,
et al . 2021. Comparative study between exogenously applied plant growth hormones versus metabolites of microbial endophytes as plant growth-promoting forPhaseolus vulgaris L.Cells 10 : 1059. - Xavier ML, Bosch AR, Karp SG, Soccol CR. 2021. Endophytic bacteria: a possible path towards a sustainable agriculture.
Biotechnol. Res. Innov. 5 : e2021008. - Degrassi G, Carpentieri-Pipolo V. 2020. Bacterial endophytes associated to crops: novel practices for sustainable agriculture.
Adv. Biochem. Biotechnol. 5 : 1099. - Mukherjee A, Bhowmick S, Yadav S, Rashid MM, Chouhan GK, Vaishya JK,
et al . 2021. Re-vitalizing of endophytic microbes for soil health management and plant protection.3 Biotech 11 : 399. - Eid AM, Fouda A, Abdel-Rahman MA, Salem SS, Elsaied A, Oelmüller R,
et al . 2021. Harnessing bacterial endophytes for promotion of plant growth and biotechnological applications: an overview.Plants (Basel) 10 : 935. - Tiwari P, Kang S, Bae H. 2023. Plant-endophyte associations: rich yet under-explored sources of novel bioactive molecules and applications.
Microbiol. Res. 266 : 127241. - Shi Y, Yang H, Zhang T, Sun J, Lou K. 2014. Illumina-based analysis of endophytic bacterial diversity and space-time dynamics in sugar beet on the north slope of Tianshan mountain.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98 : 6375-6385. - Afzal I, Shinwari ZK, Sikandar S, Shahzad S. 2019. Plant beneficial endophytic bacteria: mechanisms, diversity, host range and genetic determinants.
Microbiol. Res. 221 : 36-49. - Suman A, Yadav AN, Verma P. 2016. Endophytic microbes in crops: diversity and beneficial impact for sustainable agriculture, pp. 117-143.
In Singh D, Singh H, Prabha R (eds.),Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity. Springer , New Delhi, India. - Kashtan N, Roggensack SE, Rodrigue S, Thompson JW, Biller SJ, Coe A,
et al . 2014. Single-cell genomics reveals hundreds of coexisting subpopulations in wild Prochlorococcus.Science 344 : 416-20. - Koch H, Germscheid N, Freese HM, Noriega-Ortega B, Lücking D, Berger M,
et al . 2020. Genomic, metabolic and phenotypic variability shapes ecological differentiation and intraspecies interactions ofAlteromonas macleodii .Sci. Rep. 10 : 809. - Ryan RP, Germaine K, Franks A, Ryan DJ, Dowling DN. 2008. Bacterial endophytes: recent developments and applications.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 278 : 1-9. - Vurukonda SSKP, Giovanardi D, Stefani E. 2018. Plant growth promoting and biocontrol activity of
Streptomyces spp. as endophytes.Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19 : 952. - Romero FM, Marina M, Pieckenstain FL. 2014. The communities of tomato (
Solanum lycopersicum L.) leaf endophytic bacteria, analyzed by 16S-ribosomal RNA gene pyrosequencing.FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 351 : 187-194. - Lundberg DS, Lebeis SL, Paredes SH, Yourstone S, Gehring J, Malfatti S,
et al . 2012. Defining the coreArabidopsis thaliana root microbiome.Nature 488 : 86-90. - Pirttilä AM, Laukkane H, Pospiech H, Myllylã R, Hohtola A. 2000. Detection of intracellular bacteria in buds of Scoth pine (
Pinus sylvestris L.) by in situ hybridization.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66 : 3037-3077. - Younas H, Nazir A, Bareen Fe, Tries JE. 2023. Metabolic profile and molecular characterization of endophytic bacteria isolated from
Pinus sylvestris L. with growth-promoting effect on sunflower.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30 : 40147-40161. - Izumi H, Anderson IC, Killham K, Moore ER. 2008. Diversity of predominant endophytic bacteria in European deciduous and coniferous trees.
Can. J. Microbiol. 54 : 173-179. - Shishido M, Massicotte HB, Chanway CP. 1996. Effect of plant growth promoting
Bacillus strains on pine and spruce seedling growth and mycorrhizal infection.Ann. Bot. 77 : 433-441. - Carrell AA, Frank AC. 2014.
Pinus flexilis andPicea engelmannii share a simple and consistent needle endophyte microbiota with a potential role in nitrogen fixation.Front. Microbiol. 5 : 333. - Durrant T, de Rigo D, Caudullo G. 2016.
Pinus sylvestris in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats, pp. e016b94+.In San-Miguel-Ayanz J, de Rigo D, Caudullo G, Houston Durrant T, Mauri A (eds.),European Atlas of Forest Tree Species . Publ. Off. EU, Luxembourg. - Brichta J, Šimunek V, Bílek L, Vacek Z, Gallo J, Drozdowski S,
et al . 2024. Effects of climate change on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) growth across Europe: decrease of tree-ring fluctuation and amplification of climate stress.Forests 15 : 91. - Dobbertin M, Wermelinger B, Bigler C, Bürgi M, Carron M, Forster B,
et al . 2007. Linking increasing drought stress to Scots pine mortality and bark beetle infestations.Sci. World J. 7 : 231-239. - Aguadé D, Poyatos R, Gómez M, Oliva J, Martínez-Vilalta J. 2015. The role of defoliation and root rot pathogen infection in driving the mode of drought-related physiological decline in Scots pine (
Pinus sylvestris L.).Tree physiol. 35 : 229-242. - Trivedi P, Batista BD, Bazany KE, Singh BK. 2022. Plant-microbiome interactions under a changing world: responses, consequences and perspectives.
New Phytol. 234 : 1951-1959. - Zboralski A, Filion M. 2023.
Pseudomonas spp. can help plants face climate change.Front. Microbiol. 14 : 1198131. - Rajkumar M, Bruno LB, Banu JR. 2017. Alleviation of environmental stress in plants: the role of beneficial
Pseudomonas spp.Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 : 1-36. - Ali SZ, Sandhya V, Grover M, Linga VR, Bandi V. 2011. Effect of inoculation with a thermotolerant plant growth promoting
Pseudomonas putida strain AKMP7 on growth of wheat (Triticum spp.) under heat stress.J. Plant Interact. 6 : 239-246. - Orozco-Mosqueda MdC, Flores A, Rojas-Sánchez B, Urtis-Flores CA, Morales-Cedeño LR, Valencia-Marin MF,
et al . 2021. Plant growth-promoting bacteria as bioinoculants: attributes and challenges for sustainable crop improvement.Agronomy 11 : 1167. - Saglam A, Demiralay M, Colak DN, Gedik NP, Basok O, Kadioglu A. 2022.
Pseudomonas putida KT2440 induces drought tolerance during fruit ripening in tomato.Bioagro. 34 : 139-150. - Grichko VP, Glick BR. 2001. Flooding tolerance of transgenic tomato plants expressing the bacterial enzyme ACC deaminase controlled by the 35S,
rolD or PRB-1b promoter.Plant Physiol. Biochem. 39 : 19-25. - Puri A, Padda KP, Chanway CP. 2020. Sustaining the growth of
Pinaceae trees under nutrient-limited edaphic conditions via plantbeneficial bacteria.PLoS One 15 : e0238055. - Ozkaya MS. 2024. Investigation of the effects of a plant growth regulatory bacterium,
Pseudomonas putida KT2440 strain, on the germination of black pine and scotch pine seeds in different soil mixtures.Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 23 : 149-156. - Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PH, Staley JT, Williams ST. 1994.
Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology , pp. 786-788. 9th. Baltimor: William & Wilkins. - Pei CX, Liu Q, Dong CS, Li HQ, Jiang JB, Gao WJ. 2010. Diversity and abundance of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences in forestomach of alpacas (
Lama pacos ) and sheep (Ovis aries ).Anaerobe 16 : 426-432. - Heuer H, Krsek M, Baker P, Smalla K, Wellington EM. 1997. Analysis of actinomycete communities by specific amplification of genes encoding 16S rRNA and gel-electrophoretic separation in denaturing gradients.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63 : 3233-3241. - Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. 2021. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11.
Mol. Biol. Evol. 38 : 3022-3027. - Subba Rao NS. 1977.
Soil microorganisms and plant growth , pp. 254-255. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi. - Dobereiner J, Marriel IE, Nery M. 1976. Ecological distribution of
Spirillum lipoferum Beijerinck.Can. J. Microbiol. 22 : 1464-1473. - Baldani JI, Reis VM, Videira SS, Boddey LH, Baldani VLD. 2014. The art of isolating nitrogen-fixing bacteria from non-leguminous plants using N-free semi-solid media: a practical guide for microbiologists.
Plant Soil 384 : 413-431. - Pikovskaya R. 1948. Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with vital activity of some microbial species.
Mikrobiologiya 17 : 362-370. - Paul D, Narayan Sinha S. 2013. Phosphate solubilizing activity of some bacterial strains isolated from jute mill effluent exposed water of river Ganga.
Indian J. Fundam. Appl. Life Sci. 3 : 39-45. - Gordon SA, Weber RP. 1951. Colorimetric estimation of indole acetic acid.
Plant Physiol. 26 : 192-195. - Glickmann E, Dessaux Y. 1995. A critical examination of the specificity of the Salkowski reagent for indolic compounds produced by phytopathogenic bacteria.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61 : 793-796. - Patten CL, Glick BR. 2002. Role of
Pseudomonas putida indoleacetic acid in development of the host plant root system.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68 : 3795-3801. - Cappuccino JC, Sherman N. 1992. Negative staining, pp.1464-1473.
In Cappuccino JC, Sherman N (eds.)Microbiology: a laboratory manual . Redwood City, CA, Benjamin, Cummings. - Abdelwahed S, Trabelsi E, Saadouli I, Kouidhi S, Masmoudi AS, Cherif A,
et al . 2022. A new pioneer colorimetric microplate method for the estimation of ammonia production by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR).Main Group Chem. 21 : 55-68. - Schwyn B, Neilands JB. 1987. Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores.
Analytical. Biochem. 160 : 47-56. - Asea P, Kucey R, Stewart J. 1988. Inorganic phosphate solubilization by two
Penicillium species in solution culture and soil.Soil Biol. Biochem. 20 : 459-464. - Castric KF, Castric PA. 1983. Method for rapid detection of cyanogenic bacteria.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45 : 701-702. - Bano N, Musarrat J. 2003. Characterization of a new
Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain NJ-15 as a potential biocontrol agent.Curr. Microbiol. 46 : 324-328. - Zhao X, Song P, Hou D, Li Z, Hu Z. 2021. Antifungal activity, identification and biosynthetic potential analysis of fungi against
Rhizoctonia cerealis .Ann. Microbiol. 71 : 41. - Tariq M, Yasmin S, Hafeez FY. 2010. Biological control of potato black scurf by rhizosphere associated bacteria.
Braz. J. Microbiol. 41 : 439-451. - Minaxi, Saxena J. 2010. Characterization of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa RM-3 as a potential biocontrol agent.Mycopathologia 170 : 181-193. - Gupta PC. 1993. Seed vigour testing, pp. 242-249.
In Agrawal PK (eds.),Handbook of Seed Testing . Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi. - Matthysse AG. 2018. Adherence of bacteria to plant surfaces measured in the laboratory.
J. Vis. Exp. 136 : e56599. - Sivolodskiĭ EP. 2012. The synthetic growth medium King's BS for detection of fluorescein synthesis by
Pseudomonas bacteria.Klin Lab. Diagn. 10 : 60-62. - Peng Y, Tang Y, Li D, Ye J. 2024. The growth-promoting and colonization of the pine endophytic
Pseudomonas abietaniphila for pine wilt disease control.Microorganisms 12 : 1089. - Strzelczyk E, Li CY. 2000. Bacterial endobionts in the big non-mycorrhizal roots of Scots pine (
Pinus sylvestris L.).Microbiol. Res. 155 : 229-232. - Sah S, Krishnani S, Singh R. 2021.
Pseudomonas mediated nutritional and growth promotional activities for sustainable food security.Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2 : 100084. - Weller DM. 2007.
Pseudomonas biocontrol agents of soilborne pathogens: looking back over 30 years.Phytopathology 97 : 250-256. - Khan ZDR, Kintz T, delas Alas M, Yap R, Doty S. 2014. Degradation, phytoprotection and phytoremediation of phenanthrene by endophyte
Pseudomonas putida , PD1.Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 : 1221-1228. - Agisha VN, Eapen SJ, Monica V, Sheoran N, Munjal V, Suseelabhai R,
et al . 2017. Plant endophyticPseudomonas putida BP25 induces expression of defense genes in black pepper roots: deciphering through suppression subtractive hybridization analysis.Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 100 : 106-116. - Asif H, Studholme DJ, Khan A, Aurongzeb M, Khan IA, Azim MK. 2016. Comparative genomics of an endophytic
Pseudomonas putida isolated from mango orchard.Genet. Mol. Biol. 39 : 465-473. - Andreote FD, de Araújo WL, de Azevedo JL, van Elsas JD, da Rocha UN, van Overbeek LS. 2009. Endophytic colonization of potato (
Solanum tuberosum L.) by a novel competent bacterial endophyte,Pseudomonas putida strain P9, and its effect on associated bacterial communities.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75 : 3396-3406. - Kuklinsky-Sobral J, Araújo WL, Mendes R, Pizzirani-Kleiner AA, Azevedo JL. 2005. Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria from soybean (
Glycine max ) grown in soil treated with glyphosate herbicide.Plant Soil 273 : 91-99. - Agbodjato NA, Adoko MY, Babalola OO, Amogou O, Badé FT, Noumavo PA,
et al . 2021. Efficacy of biostimulants formulated withPseudomonas putida and clay, peat, clay-peat binders on maize productivity in a farming environment in Southern Benin.Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 5 : 666718. - Verma SK, Kingsley K, Irizarry I, Bergen M, Kharwar RN, White JF. 2017. Seed‐vectored endophytic bacteria modulate development of rice seedlings.
J. Appl. Microbiol. 122 : 1680-1691. - Palleroni NJ, Bradbury JF. 1993.
Stenotrophomonas , a new bacterial genus forXanthomonas maltophilia (Hugh 1980) Swings et al. 1983.Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 43 : 606-609. - Dunne C, Crowley JJ, Moënne-Loccoz Y, Dowling DN, Bruijn S, O'Gara F. 1997. Biological control of
Pythium ultimum byStenotrophomonas maltophilia W81 is mediated by an extracellular proteolytic activity.Microbiology 143 : 3921-3931. - Abreu-Tarazi MF, Navarrete AA, Andreote FD, Almeida CV, Tsai SM, Almeida MD. 2010. Endophytic bacteria in long-term
in vitro cultivated "axenic" pineapple microplants revealed by PCR-DGGE.World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26 : 555-560. - Zhu B, Liu H, Tian WX, Fan XY, Li B, Zhou XP,
et al . 2012. Genome sequence ofStenotrophomonas maltophilia RR-10, isolated as an endophyte from rice root.J. Bacteriol. 194 : 1280-1281. - Hagaggi NSA, Abdul-Raouf UM. 2022. The endophyte
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia EPS modulates endogenous antioxidant defense in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under cadmium stress.Arch. Microbiol. 204 : 431. - Adeleke BS, Ayangbenro AS, Babalola OO. 2022. Effect of endophytic bacterium,
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia JVB5 on sunflowers.Plant Protect. Sci. 58 : 185-198. - Taghavi S, Garafola C, Monchy S, Newman L, Hoffman A, Weyens N,
et al . 2009. Genome survey and characterization of endophytic bacteria exhibiting a beneficial effect on growth and development of poplar trees.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75 : 748-757. - Behrendt U, Ulrich A, Schumann P, Meyer JM, Spröer C. 2007.
Pseudomonas lurida sp. nov., a fluorescent species as sociated with the phyllosphere of grasses.Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57 : 979-985. - Doty SL, Joubert PM, Firrincieli A, Sher AW, Tournay R, Kill C,
et al . 2023. Potential biocontrol activities ofPopulus endophytes against several plant pathogens using different inhibitory mechanisms.Pathogens 12 : 13. - Girard L, Lood C, Höfte M, Vandamme P, Rokni-Zadeh H, van Noort V,
et al . 2021. The ever-expandingPseudomonas genus: description of 43 new species and partition of thePseudomonas putida group.Microorganisms 9 : 1766. - Wójcik M, Koper P, Żebracki K, Marczak M, Mazur A. 2023. Genomic and metabolic characterization of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolated from nodules of clovers grown in non-farmed soil.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 : 16679. - Etesami H, Alikhani HA, Hosseini HM. 2015. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production trait, a useful screening to select endophytic and rhizosphere competent bacteria for rice growth promoting agents.
MethodsX 2 : 72-78. - Malik DK, Sindhu SS. 2011. Production of indoleacetic acid by
Pseudomonas sp. effect of coinoculation withMesorhizobium sp. cicer on nodulation and plant growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum ).Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 17 : 25-32. - Neha G, Pankaj S, Rana JC, Mohar S. 2021. Detection of plant growth promoting traits in
Pseudomonas lurida AH1 isolated from rhizosphere ofAconitum Heterophyllum wall. ex royle.Green Rep. 2 : 26-31. - Mishra PK, Mishra S, Bisht SC, Selvakumar G, Kundu S, Bisht JK,
et al . 2009. Isolation, molecular characterization and growthpromotion activities of a cold tolerant bacteriumPseudomonas sp. Nars9 (mtcc9002) from the Indian Himalayas.Biol. Res. 42 : 305-313. - Etminani F, Harighi B. 2018. Isolation and identification of endophytic bacteria with plant growth promoting activity and biocontrol potential from wild pistachio trees.
Plant Pathol. J. 34 : 208-217. - Ambawade M, Pathade G. 2013. Production of indole acetic acid (IAA) by
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia BE25 isolated from roots of banana (musa spp.).Int. J. Sci. Res. 4 : 2644-2650. - Berg G. 2009. Plant-microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 84 : 11-18. - Souza Rd, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LM. 2015. Plant growth-promoting bacteria as inoculants in agricultural soils.
Genet. Mol. Biol. 38 : 401-419. - Ahemad M, Kibret M. 2014. Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: current perspective.
J. King Saud. Univ. Sci. 26 : 1-20. - Puri A, Padda KP, Chanway CP. 2017. Plant growth promotion by endophytic bacteria in nonnative crop hosts, pp. 11-45. In Maheshwari D, Annapurna K (eds.)
Endophytes: Crop Productivity and Protection. Sustainable Development and Biodiversity . Springer, Cham. - Costa-Gutierrez SB, Adler C, Espinosa-Urgel M, de Cristóbal RE. 2022.
Pseudomonas putida and its close relatives: mixing and mastering the perfect tune for plants.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 106 : 3351-3367. - Li HB, Singh RK, Singh P, Song QQ, Xing YX, Yang LT,
et al . 2017. Genetic diversity of nitrogen-fixing and plant growth promotingPseudomonas Species isolated from sugarcane rhizosphere.Front. Microbiol. 8 : 1268.3351-3367. - Martin PA, Jayanthi D, Thamizhseran N. 2019. Isolation and Proto-cooperation of
Pseudomonas putida TS 18 from Water Calyx Fluid ofSpathodea campanulata P. Beauv.J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 13 : 2027-2033. - Kumar A, Tripti, Voropaeva O, Maleva M, Panikovskaya K, Borisova G,
et al . 2021. Bioaugmentation with copper tolerant endophytePseudomonas lurida strain EOO26 for improved plant growth and copper phytoremediation byHelianthus annuus .Chemosphere 266 : 128983. - Huda N, Tanvir R, Badar J, Ali I, Rehman Y. 2022. Arsenic-resistant plant growth promoting
Pseudoxanthomonas mexicana S254 andStenotrophomonas maltophilia S255 isolated from agriculture soil contaminated by industrial effluent.Sustainability 14 : 10697. - Abd-Alla MH, Bashandy SR, Nafady NA, Hassan AA. 2018. Enhance mentofexopolysaccharide Production by
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia andBrevibacillus parabrevis isolated from root nodules ofCicera rietinum L. andVigna unguiculata L. (Walp.) plants.Rend. Lincei Sci. Fis. Nat. 29 : 117-129. - Reinhardt EL, Ramos PL, Manfio GP, Barbosa HR, Pavan C, Moreira-Filho CA. 2008. Molecular characterization of nitrogen-fixing bacteria isolated from brazilian agricultural plants at São Paulo state.
Braz. J. Microbiol. 39 : 414-422. - Singh RK, Singh P, Li HB, Guo D J, Song QQ, Yang LT,
et al . 2020. Plant-PGPR plant growth-promoting diazotrophsKosakonia radicincitans BA1 andStenotrophomonas maltophilia COA2 to enhance growth and stress-related gene expression inSaccharum spp.J. Plant Int. 15 : 427-445. - Oteino N, Lally RD, Kiwanuka S, Lloyd A, Ryan D, Germaine KJ, Dowling DN. 2015. Plant growth promotion induced by phosphate solubilizing endophytic
Pseudomonas isolates.Front. Microbiol. 6 : 745. - Stein NV, Eder M, Burr F, Stoss S, Holzner L, Kunz H,
et al . 2023. The RND efflux system ParXY affects siderophore secretion inPseudomonas putida KT2440.Microbiol. Spectr. 11 : e02300-23. - García CA, De Rossi BP, Alcaraz E, Vay C, Franco M. 2012. Siderophores of
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia : detection and determination of their chemical nature.Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 44 : 150-154. - Calvente V, de Orellano ME, Sansone G, Benuzzi D, de Tosetti MS. 2001. Effect of nitrogen source and pH on siderophore production by
Rhodotorula strains and their application to biocontrol of phytopathogenic moulds.J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26 : 226-229. - Kovaleva VA, Shalovylo YI, Gorovik YN, Lagonenko AL, Evtushenkov AN, Gout RT. 2015.
Bacillus pumilus - a new phytopathogen of Scots pine.J. For. Sci. 61 : 131-137. - Jeong H, Choi S, Kloepper JW, Ryu C. 2014. Genome sequence of the plant endophyte
Bacillus pumilus INR7, triggering induced systemic resistance in field crops.Genome Announc. 2 : e01093-14. - Dobrzyński J, Jakubowska Z, Kulkova I, Kowalczyk P, Kramkowski K. 2023. Biocontrol of fungal phytopathogens by
Bacillus pumilus .Front. Microbiol. 14 : 1194606. - Shuai H, Meng Y, Luo X, Chen F, Zhou W, Dai Y,
et al . 2017. Exogenous auxin represses soybean seed germination through decreasing the gibberellin/abscisic acid (GA/ABA) ratio.Sci. Rep. 7 : 12620. - Kumar A, Rithesh L, Kumar V, Raghuvanshi N, Chaudhary K, Abhineet,
et al . 2023.Stenotrophomonas in diversified cropping systems: friend or foe?Front. Microbiol. 14 : 1214680. - Henry PM, Gebben SJ, Tech JJ, Yip JL, Leveau JH. 2016. Inhibition of
Xanthomonas fragariae , causative agent of angular leaf spot of strawberry, through iron deprivation.Front. Microbiol. 7 : 1589. - Pastor N, Masciarelli O, Fischer S, Luna V, Rovera M. 2016. Potential of
Pseudomonas putida PCI2 for the protection of tomato plants against fungal pathogens.Curr. Microbiol. 73 : 346-353. - Oliver C, Hernández I, Caminal M, Lara JM, Fernàndez C. 2019.
Pseudomonas putida strain B2017 produced as technical grade active ingredient controls fungal and bacterial crop diseases.Biocontrol. Sci. Technol. 29 : 1053-1068. - Kumar A, Verma H, Singh VK, Singh PP, Singh SK, Ansari WA, et al. 2017. Role of
Pseudomonas sp. in sustainable agriculture and disease management, pp. 195-215.In Meena VS, Mishra PK, Bisht JK, Pattanayak A (eds.),Agriculturally important microbes for sustainable agriculture. Springer , Singapore. - Aydinoglu F, Iltas O, Akkaya O. 2020. Inoculation of maize seeds with
Pseudomonas putida leads to enhanced seedling growth in combination with modified regulation of miRNAs and antioxidant enzymes.Symbiosis 81 : 271-285. - Nascimento F, Vicente C, Espada M, Bernard Glick R, Mota M, Oliveira S. 2013. Evidence for the involvement of ACC deaminase from
Pseudomonas putida UW4 in the biocontrol of pine wilt disease caused byBursaphelenchus xylophilus .BioControl 58 : 427-433. - Compant S, Clément C, Sessitsch A. 2010. Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo- and endosphere of plants: their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization.
Soil Biol. Biochem. 42 : 669-678. - Espinosa-Urgel M, Salido A, Ramos JL. 2000. Genetic analysis of functions involved in adhesion of
Pseudomonas putida to seeds.J. Bacteriol. 182 : 2363-2369. - Puri A, Padda KP, Chanway CP. 2020.
In vitro andin vivo analyses of plant-growth-promoting potential of bacteria naturally associated with spruce trees growing on nutrient-poor soils.Appl. Soil Ecol. 149 : 103538. - Shishido M, Chanway CP. 2000. Colonization and growth of outplanted spruce seedlings pre-inoculated with plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria in the greenhouse.
Can. J. For. Res. 30 : 848-854.
Related articles in JMB

Article
Research article
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2025; 35():
Published online January 15, 2025 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2408.08056
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Isolation and Characterization of Multi-Trait Plant Growth-Promoting Endophytic Bacteria from Scots Pine Tissues
Yuliia I. Shalovylo1,3, Yurii M. Yusypovych1, Oleh Y. Kit1, and Valentina A. Kovaleva1,2*
1Ukrainian National Forestry University, 103 Gen Chuprynky Str., Lviv 79057, Ukraine
2Institute of Cell Biology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 14/16 Drahomanova Str., Lviv 79005, Ukraine
3Sudova Vyshnya Lyceum Named after Tadei Dmytrasevych, Lviv Region, Ukraine
Correspondence to:Valentina A Kovaleva, kovaleva@nltu.edu.ua
Abstract
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) is a globally significant tree species with considerable economic importance in forestry. A major challenge in afforestation, particularly in stressful environments, is growing seedlings with high viability and stress resistance. Recent studies suggest that Pseudomonas strains can alleviate stress and promote growth in crops, though limited evidence exists for trees. This study aimed to assess the plant growth-promoting (PGP) properties of Pseudomonas strains isolated from Scots pine stems using in vitro assays, and to evaluate their potential as bioinoculants through a two-year long field trial. From over sixty bacterial isolates originating from Scots pine stem tissues, only four were selected as being similar to Pseudomonas bacteria. Through 16S rRNA gene sequencing, the isolates were identified as Pseudomonas putida P57, Pseudomonas lurida P88 and 10-1, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia P77. All isolates inhibited fungal pathogens Botrytis cinerea and Fusarium sporotrichiella, and exhibited PGP activities including nitrogen fixation and production of IAA (1.24-17.74 mg/l), ammonia (4.06-12.71 μM/ml), and siderophores, with the highest value of 1.44 ± 0.19 for the P. lurida P88 strain. Additionally, the Pseudomonas strains demonstrated phosphate solubilization capacity. We revealed that bioinoculation with strains P57 and P88 enhanced field germination of seeds by 35-45% and increased aerial biomass of two-year-old seedlings by 80-140%. Both strains adhered to seed surface and colonized roots and stems at levels of 2.4-3.2 log CFU/g fresh tissue up to two years post-inoculation. These findings highlight the potential of these bacterial strains as effective bioinoculants for improving Scots pine seedling growth under natural conditions.
Keywords: Endophytic bacteria, Pinus sylvestris L., Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas, growth-promoting potential, seed inoculation
Introduction
Plants are closely associated with a myriad of microorganisms, including protists, fungi, and bacteria, which together form their microbiome. The vast majority of plants on Earth are colonized by endophytes [1], and a plant without endophytes is a rare exception in nature [2]. Endophytic bacteria benefit plants by promoting growth, suppressing pathogens, enhancing stress resistance, and boosting immunity [3]. Since they share ecological niches with phytopathogens, endophytes can help protect plants from harmful microbes [4].
Bacterial endophytes similar to plant growth-promoting rizobacteria can directly promote plant growth through the production of phytohormones (indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid, etc.), phosphate solubilization, nitrogen fixation, siderophore, hydrogen cyanide (HCN), and ammonia production [5-8]. They also contribute indirectly by suppressing disease by producing antibiotics and secondary metabolites, inducing systemic resistance, protecting against pests, and performing metal bioremediation to aid growth in contaminated soils [9-11].
Endophytic bacteria have been isolated from various plant parts, including roots, stems, leaves, and seeds in multiple plant species [5], with genera such as
Most of our knowledge about bacterial endophytic microbiomes comes from studies on crop plants and the model species
Several studies examining the endophyte microbiome in conifer trees have have identified various bacterial genera within the pine holobiont. For instance,
Scots pine is a widespread species of pine that grows naturally over a large area of Eurasia. It is a pioneer species, frost- and drought-tolerant, capable of growing in very poor soils, and can be found in many different environments [26]. However, climate fluctuations negatively affect its photosynthesis, growth [27], and resistance to pests and fungal pathogens [28, 29]. Recent research shows that plant microbiomes can help mitigate these impacts by enhancing nutrition, growth, defense against pathogens, and tolerance to abiotic stresses [30].
Among plant beneficial endophytic bacteria,
Scots pine is a long-lived plant that experiences significant fluctuations in climatic conditions during its ontogeny and inhabits areas with poor soils. Therefore, the search for strains of endophytic bacteria from Scots pine with PGP abilities is promising for sustaining the growth of pine trees under nutrient-poor edaphic conditions in the context of global climate change.
This research aimed to investigate the PGP capabilities of
Materials and Methods
Biological Material
For endophytic bacteria isolation, samples were collected from healthy Scots pine trees located at Sudova Vyshnya forestry (49°48'19.0''N 23°22'27.9''E) in the Lviv region of Ukraine. A sterilized knife was used to cut pine tissues from under the bark of the trunk, which were then placed in plastic bags. The samples were transported to the laboratory in an ice cooler box and used for bacterial isolation within 24 h. Scots pine seeds were gathered from trees in the same region in February and stored at +4°C in the dark.
The fungal cultures of
Endophytic Bacteria Isolation
Pieces of Scots pine wood were thoroughly washed with tap water. They were then surface-sterilized by dipping them into 70% (v/v) ethanol for 5 min, followed by treatment with a 5% (v/v) aqueous solution of sodium hypochlorite for 5 min. Finally, the wood pieces were rinsed twice with autoclaved distilled water [22]. The success of sterilization was assessed by plating an aliquot of the final wash onto LB agar, incubating it at 30°C for 24-72 h, and checking for microbial growth on the surface of the nutrient medium.
The sterilized wood pieces were cut into small fragments under aseptic conditions and placed on the surface of LB-agar Petri dishes. The plates were incubated at 30°C and checked daily for bacterial growth. The bacterial colonies that appeared were then picked up and re-plated on fresh LB agar medium to obtain pure cultures. The bacterial strains were stored as 30% glycerol stocks at −20°C for further analysis.
The isolated strains were grouped according to colony morphology, cell shape, growth rate, and Gram reaction. Rod-shaped, motile, gram-negative bacteria were selected for further identification. The biochemical characteristics of the selected isolates were tested using standard methods [39]. To screen for antibiotic susceptibility, the isolates were grown on nutrient agar with a range of antibiotics, including ampicillin (100 μg/ml), streptomycin (50 μg/ml), tetracycline (5 μg/ml), kanamycin (15 μg/ml), rifampicin (10 μg/ml), and nalidixic acid (20 μg/ml). Four bacterial strains were selected for molecular identification.
Molecular Identification of Endophytic Bacteria
The bacterial isolates P57, P77, P88, and P10-1 were grown on LB agar for 72 h at 30°C. Bacterial genomic DNA was isolated using a QIAamp DNA Kit (Qiagen). Amplification of the 16S rRNA gene was performed using the universal primer pairs 8F (5’-AGAGTTTGATYMTGGCTCAG-3’) and 1510R (5’-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3’)[40, 41]. The PCR products were sent to Explogen LLC (EXG, Lviv, Ukraine) for Sanger sequencing.
To identify the closest taxa, the 16S rRNA sequences were aligned with those from the National Center for Biotechnology Information nucleotide nr/nt (non-redundant nucleotide) database using the BLASTN algorithm (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) and submitted to the GenBank database to obtain accession numbers. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood method with MEGA version 11 software [42], specifically designed for the 16S rRNA sequences, to determine the phylogenetic position of the isolates.
PGP Properties Screening
Nitrogen Fixation Capability
Molecular nitrogen fixation was tested on nitrogen-free medium, such as Ashby-sucrose agar [43] and Nfb (nitrogen-free bromothymol blue) semi-solid medium [44, 45]. The Ashby medium was inoculated by streaking from bacterial cultures, and incubating at 30°C for 5 days, until bacterial growth was observed. The cultures were then successively passaged twice to confirm strain growth. Any growth on the medium indicated the bacteria's ability to fix nitrogen.
The NFb-medium was used for visual detection of nitrogen-fixing activity in bacterial strains. The test involved growing 1 ml of bacterial suspension (108 CFU/ml) in 9 ml of Nfb semi-solid media. Nitrogen-fixing ability of isolates P57, P77, P88, and P10-1 was indicated by a color change, turning blue or dark blue after 48 h of incubation.
Phosphate Solubilization
The phosphate-solubilizing abilities of the tested isolates were measured on Pikovskaya agar (PVK) medium [46]. Briefly, 5 μl of a fresh suspension of each isolate (108 CFU/ml) was spotted onto a PVK agar plate and incubated at 30°C. The phosphate solubilization potential of the isolate was indicated by the formation of a halo zone surrounding the sites of bacterial colonies. The phosphate solubilization index (PSI) was calculated after 5 days of incubation as follows [47]:
PSI = (colony diameter + halo zone diameter) / colony diameter
Indole Acetic Acid (IAA) Production
The
Y=0.0208x+0.1196, R2=0.9648.
Ammonia Production Assay
The ammonia production was revealed using a spectrophotometric quantification assay with addition of Nessler’s reagent [51]. The bacterial strains were pre-grown in LB medium for 24 h at 30°C. Half a milliliter of the bacterial supernatant was mixed with 1 ml of Nessler’s reagent in test tubes previously washed with ultrapure water. The reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature (25°C) for 10 min, then diluted 6x to a final volume of 9 ml [52]. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a ULAB 102-UV UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The ammonia concentration was calculated using a standard curve of ammonium sulfate (NH4)2SO4 solution in μM (ranging from 0.5 to 40 mM).
Siderophore Production
The siderophore-producing potential of bacterial strains was investigated on Chrome Azurol S agar plates [53]. An aliquot (5 μl) of overnight bacterial culture was placed on the surface of a Chrome azurol-S agar plate. The plates were incubated at 30°C for 7 days, and then observed for the formation of an orange or yellow halo zone around the colonies. The siderophore production index (SPI) was calculated as follows [54]:
SPI = (color conversion area + colony diameter) / colony diameter
Production of Hydrogen Cyanide (HCN)
Hydrogen cyanide production by the bacterial strains was performed using HCN-sensitive paper [55, 56]. Fifty microliters of bacterial culture were swabbed onto nutrient agar supplemented with filter-sterilized glycine (4.4 g/l). A piece of Whatman paper impregnated with a sodium picrate solution (0.5% picric acid and 2% sodium carbonate) was placed in the lid of a Petri dish. The Petri dishes were then sealed with parafilm and incubated at 30°C for 10 days. HCN production by the isolated strains was indicated by a shift in the paper color from yellow to orange-brown.
In Vitro Antifungal Activity Assay
The antifungal activity of isolated endophytic bacteria against the fungi
Inhibition efficiency (%) = (C – T)/C × 100%
where C = Colony growth in control, T = Colony growth in dual culture.
PGP Assay in Planta
Laboratory Experiment
Fifty microliters of fresh cultures of the bacterial strains
For fourteen-day-old pine seedlings, the following biometric characteristics were assessed: [60]:
● Total seedling length: Measured in centimeters using a ruler.
● Germination percentage (GP): Calculated for each treatment as a percentage of total germinated seeds.
● GP = (number of germinated seeds / numbers of total seeds for bioassay) ×100%
● Seed vigor index (SVI): Calculated by multiplying seed germination (%) and seedling length (cm).
● SVI = germination percentage (GP) × means of seedling length (cm)
Field Experiment
The experiment was conducted from May 2022 to June 2024 at the Botanical Garden of the National Forestry University of Ukraine (Lviv, Ukraine). The field plot used in the experiment was 2 m wide and 9 m long. The plot was divided into three sectors based on treatments, which were located 1.5 m apart. The soil texture was sandy loam.
Sterilization of Scots pine seeds and their treatment with bacterial strains P57 or P88 were carried out as described in the 'Laboratory experiment' section. Following treatment, the seeds from both the control and inoculated groups were rinsed with 0.5 liters of sterile distilled water, and excess moisture was subsequently removed using filter paper. Control and inoculated Scots pine seeds were sown in wet soil at a depth of 1-1.5 cm. Three rows of 160 pine seeds each were sown in each sector. The distance between the rows was 50 cm. The percentage of germination for each group of seedlings was assessed on the 35th day after sowing. After counting the germlings in each group, they were watered with the corresponding bacterial suspension (107 CFU/ml) or distilled water for the control group, with a consumption of 0.5 liters of suspension per linear meter. Watering was carried out in moist soil under the seedlings. In the first year of seedling growth, two similar waterings were performed at monthly interval. In the second year of growth, no watering with the tested bacterial cultures was conducted, and the seedlings grew under natural moisturizing. The growth parameters of Scots pine seedlings were measured 5 months and 2 years after sowing. The length of aerial part and root; their fresh and dry weights, and root collar diameter were examined for 10 random seedlings from each row.
Colonization Assays
Seed Attachment Assays
Scots pine seeds were surface-sterilized by immersion in 70% ethanol for 1 min, followed by 20 min in 0.1%sodium hypochlorite, and then washed four times with sterile distilled water. The effectiveness of seed surface sterilization was assessed by placing sterilized seeds on Petri dishes containing LB agar, incubated at 30°C, and checking for bacterial growth after 24 h. Sterilized seeds (
For qualitative adhesion assays, inoculated and control washed seeds were transferred onto filter paper previously moistened with distilled water under aseptic conditions for germination. After the seed coat ruptured and the primary root appeared, the seeds were transferred to Petri dishes containing King's B agar, modified by adding L-glutamine instead of peptone (King's BS agar) [62], supplemented with ampicillin (100 μg/ml), to detect fluorescent
For the quantitative assays, bacterial incubation with the seeds and the washing procedures were performed as described above. One seed was placed in a sterile homogenizer, covered with 1 ml of sterile 0.9% NaCl, and ground until fully homogenized. Serial dilutions of the resulting homogenates were plated (0.05 ml aliquots) on King's BS agar amended with ampicillin (100 μg/ml). The Petri dishes were incubated at 30°C, and the colony-forming units (CFU) of each seed were evaluated after 24 h. Each assay was repeated at least three times.
Endophytic Colonization Assay
To evaluate endophytic colonization, two randomly selected seedlings from each row, for a total of six per treatment, were harvested two years and five months after sowing (September, 2024). The seedlings were removed from the ground and gently shaken to remove loosely adhering soil from the roots. Seedlings were thoroughly washed under tap water. From each seedling, fragments of the root, stem, and needles were taken, and their surfaces were sterilized by immersion in 1.3% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min, followed by three washes with sterile distilled water [37]. After surface sterilization of the tissue samples (1 g), excess moisture was removed using sterile filter paper. The samples were then cut into approximately 0.05 cm segments using a sterile scalpel. These segments were immersed in Falcon tubes containing 10 ml of sterile 0.9% NaCl and shaken at 28°C and 180 rpm for 30 min [63]. Next, serial dilutions of the resulting suspension were plated (0.05 ml aliquots) on King's BS agar supplemented with ampicillin (100 μg/ml). The Petri dishes were incubated at 30°C, and the CFU for each strain per gram of fresh tissue were evaluated after 7 days.
Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers
The bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences were deposited in the GenBank nucleotide sequence database under the following accession numbers: OR592462.1 (
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted using Python with the ‘scipy.stats’ library for performing
Results
Isolation of Endophytic Bacteria from Scots Pine Stem
This study found that Scots pine hosts a variety of culturable endophytic bacteria, with 64 isolates obtained from stem tissues. Among these, 21 Gram-negative isolates underwent further analysis, and four strains—P57, P77, P88, and P10-1—were preliminarily identified as
Isolate P57, a fluorescent bacterium, was Gram-negative, rod-shaped, motile, and non-spore-forming, with positive results for catalase, oxidase, and oxidative metabolism, but negative for starch and gelatin hydrolysis, nitrate reduction, and protease. It showed resistance to ampicillin and nalidixic acid.
Isolate P77, a non-fluorescent bacterium, exhibited similar characteristics but was oxidase-negative and protease-positive, with the ability to hydrolyze gelatin. It was resistant to ampicillin and kanamycin.
Isolates P88 and P10-1 had comparable features, being Gram-negative, non-spore-forming rods producing a yellow-green pigment. They tested positive for catalase, oxidase, protease, and gelatinase, but negative for starch hydrolysis and nitrate reduction. Both were resistant to ampicillin, rifampicin, and nalidixic acid.
16S rRNA Identification of Bacterial Isolates
The species identification of the isolated bacterial strains was determined by sequencing the 16S rRNA gene. The nucleotide sequences of the investigated strains were identified as members of the phylum
-
Figure 1. Phylogenetic trees constructed using the maximum likelihood method using MEGA 11 software for the 16S rRNA sequences of bacterial strains. Squares represent bacterial strains in this study.
PGP Potential of Endophytic Bacteria
The study assessed nitrogen fixation, ammonification, IAA production, phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, and HCN production capabilities of four bacterial strains:
-
Figure 2. Assessment of the plant growth promotion abilities of the bacterial isolates from Scots pine tissues
P. putida P57,S. maltophilia P77,P. lurida P88, and P10-1. (A) Nitrogen fixation in NFb medium. (B) Ammonia production. (C) IAA production. (D) Phosphate solubilization. (E) Siderophore production. (F) HCN production.
Antifungal Activity against B. cinerea and F. sporotrichiella
The antifungal activity of
-
Figure 3. Antifungal activity of the bacterial strains
P. putida P57,S. maltophilia P77,P. lurida P88, and P10-1 againstB. cinerea andF. sporotrichiella . The activity was tested using a dual culture assay. Fungal growth inhibition zones are indicated by arrows.
Effect on Scots Pine Seedling Growth
Laboratory Experiment
The comparison between growth parameters of noninoculated and inoculated Scots pine seedlings obtained from the laboratory experiments is presented in Table 1. Pre-sowing treatment of pine seeds with bacterial suspension of the Р88 strain did not have a significant effect GP value compared to control group; the other three strains reduced the number of germinated seeds by 5-8%, depending on the strain. Conversely, seed bacterization increased the total length of seedlings, with a 14% increase observed for strain P57. It also had a positive effect on viability of seedlings (SVI), particularly for strains
-
Table 1 . Effect inoculation of endophytic bacteria from Scots pine on growth parameters of 14-day-old
P. sylvestris (L.) seedlings (laboratory experiment)..
Field Experiment
Two bacterial strains of the genus
Visual examination of five-month-old seedlings revealed changes in the morphology of their root systems compared to the control group, including increased root length, branching, enhanced lateral root formation (Fig. 4A) and improved root mycorrhization (Fig. 4B). The root length in inoculated seedlings increased by 58%for both strains compared to the control (Fig. 4D). There were no significant differences in shoot length between the control and P57-inoculated seedlings, while treatment with P88 resulted in a 20.7% increase (Fig. 4C). Bacterial inoculation significantly affected the dry biomass of seedlings with dry weight increasing by 82 % for
-
Figure 4. Effect of
P. putida P57 andP. lurida P88 on the morphology (A) and mycorrhization (×20 magnification) (B) of root systems of 5-month-old seedlings and their growth parameters: shoot length (C), root length (D), and dry weights of seedlings (E). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences atp ≤ 0.05,n = 30. Error bars indicate ± SD.
The effects of seed inoculation were also assessed in two-year-old Scots pine seedlings grown under field conditions (Fig. 5A). The root system morphology differences seen in five-month-old seedlings persisted in the two-year-old plants (Fig. 5A). Inoculated plants exhibited significant growth parameter increases compared to the control. Specifically, seedlings treated with P57 and P88 were 35.3% and 43.7% taller than the control, respectively (Fig. 5C). The root collar diameter also increased significantly, with P57 and P88 exhibiting increases of 29.6% and 31.4%, respectively (Fig. 5B). The dry weight of the aerial part of inoculated plants was double that of non-inoculated ones, measuring 4.87 ± 0.4 g for control plants, 9.59 ± 0.75 g for
-
Figure 5. Growth parameters of 2-year-old
P. sylvestris seedlings inoculated with bacterial suspensionsP. putida P57 andP. lurida P88. (A) Noninoculated and inoculated 2-year-old Scots pine seedlings. (B) Root collar diameter. (C) Aerial part height. (D, E) Fresh and dry weight of aerial parts. Bars with the same letter for each compared parameter did not differ significantly atp ≤ 0.05,n = 30. Error bars indicate ± SD.
Seed and Endophytic Colonization Study
The qualitative and quantitative seed attachment assays indicated adhesion of both bacterial strains, P57 and P88, to the surface of inoculated seeds. As shown in Fig. S1, fluorescent bacteria were primarily localized around the radicle of the germinating inoculated seeds. No growth of fluorescent bacteria was detected around noninoculated seeds. Furthermore, the concentration of P88 bacteria attached to the seed surface was 20 times higher than that of P57 (Table 2). Similarly, a greater number of
-
Table 2 . Colonization of seeds and Scots pine tissues under inoculation with
Pseudomonas strains..
Discussion
In this study, we isolated endophytic bacteria from the Scots pine stem tissues and tested their growth promotion and antifungal potential
Four bacterial isolates—P57, P77, P88, and P10-1—exhibited morphological and physiological characteristics typical of the genus
The isolate P77 was identified as
Isolates P88 and P10-1 were identified as
All the strains isolated in this study likely possess plant growth-promoting properties, as similar bacterial species have shown such traits in other plants [83]. Given that strains within the same species can exhibit varied metabolic and functional profiles due to genomic differences [84], studying these new strains offers valuable insights and broadens our understanding of the potential of well-known bacterial species.
The isolates P57, P77, P88, and P10-1 were tested
-
Table 3 . Plant growth-promoting features of endophytic bacterial strains from Scots pine..
Numerous studies show that endophytic bacteria promote plant growth by enhancing nutrient uptake, including nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium [91]. Atmospheric nitrogen (N2) is inaccessible to most organisms, but diazotrophic bacteria convert it through biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) [92, 93]. In our study, all isolates—P57, P77, P88, and P10-1—grew on nitrogen-free media (Ashby and Nfb), suggesting nitrogen-fixing capabilities. The highest potential for nitrogen fixation on Nfb semi-solid medium was demonstrated by
Ammonia production is an important characteristic of the PGP trait that influences growth and can aid in biocontrol against pathogens. In the current study, all four strains showed the ability to convert organic nitrogen from peptone into ammonia, as illustrated in Fig. 2B. Notably,
Phosphorus is one of the most important nutrient elements for plants. Despite the presence of phosphorus compounds in agricultural soils, most exist in an insoluble form [103]. Among the tested strains, only
Siderophore production is an important characteristic of plant-associated microorganisms, indicating their ability to improve the bioavailability of iron to plants through their chelating properties, thereby positively influencing the growth of the host organism. In this study, all four bacterial strains exhibited siderophore production. The fluorescent strains P57, P88, and P10-1 likely synthesize pyoverdine, a known siderophore of
In addition to siderophores, endophytic bacteria can antagonize phytopathogens by producing hydrogen cyanide. In the current study, none of the isolates produced HCN. However, HCN absence did not affect their biocontrol abilities, as they utilized other pathogen inhibition mechanisms [89]. In dual culture tests, all strains inhibited the growth of the phytopathogen
The PGP abilities of isolates P57, P77, P88, and P10-1
The germination experiment results were validated in a two-year field trial using two strains, P57 and P88, which showed the best PGP results
Inoculation outcomes were assessed at three stages: germination rate on the 35th day after sowing, growth parameters after five months, and two years later. Unlike lab results, field trials showed increased seedling numbers with strain P57 (54% increase) and P88 (41% increase). Seed germination under natural conditions is one of the most vulnerable stages in plant ontogenesis. Once the seed coat is disrupted, the germinating embryo encounters soil microbiota, including soil-borne pathogens. It can be assumed that the improved germination of inoculated seedlings may be attributed to the biocontrol properties of these bacteria, as demonstrated in this study. Previous research has highlighted the biocontrol activity of
Bacterial inoculation significantly improved root system development of five-month-old Scots pine seedlings compared to noninoculated seedlings, resulting in longer and more branched roots for both strains (Fig. 4). However, while no significant shoot length difference was found between seedlings inoculated with P57 and control, inoculation with P88 increased shoot length by 20.7%. The treatment also enhanced biomass of inoculated seedlings due to the more developed root systems. This effect is likely attributed to the influence of exogenous IAA, which stimulates the formation of lateral and adventitious roots [115]. Similarly,
Inoculation with
Endophytic colonization appears to be a key factor in growth promotion. Greenhouse trials show that the size of the bacterial population directly correlates with the effectiveness of growth enhancement in conifers like spruce, lodgepole pine, and Chinese red pine [24, 37, 63]. Puri
The initial phase of colonization involves bacterial adhesion to the seed, which is essential for root colonization [118, 119]. In a quantitative seed attachment assay, both tested strains adhered to the seed coat, with
The endophytic population sizes of strains P57 and P88 in the roots and stems were significantly lower (tens to hundreds of times) than those reported for other PGP bacteria in inoculated conifers under controlled conditions [37, 63, 120]. This is likely due to natural field conditions with various biotic and abiotic stresses. Shishido and Chanway [121] observed a 10- to 100-fold reduction in PGPR populations in spruce seedlings following a transition from greenhouse to field conditions, citing the harsher field environment as the cause. Despite reduced population sizes, significant growth promotion (up to 234%) was noted in spruce.
In this study, two-year-old pine seedlings inoculated with
Detection of
Conclusion
The findings indicate that
This research represents one of the few long-term studies to successfully apply endophytic
Supplemental Materials
Acknowledgments
This article is based on work supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Ukraine (project 2021.01/0184). This work was partially supported by a grant from the Simons Foundation ([award 1030281],[VAK]).
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
Fig 1.

Fig 2.

Fig 3.

Fig 4.

Fig 5.

-
Table 1 . Effect inoculation of endophytic bacteria from Scots pine on growth parameters of 14-day-old
P. sylvestris (L.) seedlings (laboratory experiment)..
-
Table 2 . Colonization of seeds and Scots pine tissues under inoculation with
Pseudomonas strains..
-
Table 3 . Plant growth-promoting features of endophytic bacterial strains from Scots pine..
References
- Smith SA, Tank DC, Boulanger LA, Bascom-Slack CA, Eisenman K, Kingery D,
et al . 2008. Bioactive endophytes warrant intensified exploration and conservation.PLoS One 3 : e3052. - Partida-Martínez LP, Heil M. 2011. The microbe-free plant: fact or artifact?
Front. Plant Sci. 2 : 100. - Omomowo OI, Babalola OO. 2019. Bacterial and fungal endophytes: tiny giants with immense beneficial potential for plant growth and sustainable agricultural productivity.
Microorganisms 7 : 481. - Liotti RG, da Silva Figueiredo MI, da Silva GF, de Mendonça EAF, Soares MA. 2018. Diversity of cultivable bacterial endophytes in
Paullinia cupana and their potential for plant growth promotion and phytopathogen control.Microbiol. Res. 207 : 8-18. - Santoyo G, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, del Carmen O-M, Glick BR. 2016. Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes.
Microbiol. Res. 183 : 92-99. - Ismail MA, Amin MA, Eid AM, Hassan SE, Mahgoub HAM, Lashin I,
et al . 2021. Comparative study between exogenously applied plant growth hormones versus metabolites of microbial endophytes as plant growth-promoting forPhaseolus vulgaris L.Cells 10 : 1059. - Xavier ML, Bosch AR, Karp SG, Soccol CR. 2021. Endophytic bacteria: a possible path towards a sustainable agriculture.
Biotechnol. Res. Innov. 5 : e2021008. - Degrassi G, Carpentieri-Pipolo V. 2020. Bacterial endophytes associated to crops: novel practices for sustainable agriculture.
Adv. Biochem. Biotechnol. 5 : 1099. - Mukherjee A, Bhowmick S, Yadav S, Rashid MM, Chouhan GK, Vaishya JK,
et al . 2021. Re-vitalizing of endophytic microbes for soil health management and plant protection.3 Biotech 11 : 399. - Eid AM, Fouda A, Abdel-Rahman MA, Salem SS, Elsaied A, Oelmüller R,
et al . 2021. Harnessing bacterial endophytes for promotion of plant growth and biotechnological applications: an overview.Plants (Basel) 10 : 935. - Tiwari P, Kang S, Bae H. 2023. Plant-endophyte associations: rich yet under-explored sources of novel bioactive molecules and applications.
Microbiol. Res. 266 : 127241. - Shi Y, Yang H, Zhang T, Sun J, Lou K. 2014. Illumina-based analysis of endophytic bacterial diversity and space-time dynamics in sugar beet on the north slope of Tianshan mountain.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98 : 6375-6385. - Afzal I, Shinwari ZK, Sikandar S, Shahzad S. 2019. Plant beneficial endophytic bacteria: mechanisms, diversity, host range and genetic determinants.
Microbiol. Res. 221 : 36-49. - Suman A, Yadav AN, Verma P. 2016. Endophytic microbes in crops: diversity and beneficial impact for sustainable agriculture, pp. 117-143.
In Singh D, Singh H, Prabha R (eds.),Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity. Springer , New Delhi, India. - Kashtan N, Roggensack SE, Rodrigue S, Thompson JW, Biller SJ, Coe A,
et al . 2014. Single-cell genomics reveals hundreds of coexisting subpopulations in wild Prochlorococcus.Science 344 : 416-20. - Koch H, Germscheid N, Freese HM, Noriega-Ortega B, Lücking D, Berger M,
et al . 2020. Genomic, metabolic and phenotypic variability shapes ecological differentiation and intraspecies interactions ofAlteromonas macleodii .Sci. Rep. 10 : 809. - Ryan RP, Germaine K, Franks A, Ryan DJ, Dowling DN. 2008. Bacterial endophytes: recent developments and applications.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 278 : 1-9. - Vurukonda SSKP, Giovanardi D, Stefani E. 2018. Plant growth promoting and biocontrol activity of
Streptomyces spp. as endophytes.Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19 : 952. - Romero FM, Marina M, Pieckenstain FL. 2014. The communities of tomato (
Solanum lycopersicum L.) leaf endophytic bacteria, analyzed by 16S-ribosomal RNA gene pyrosequencing.FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 351 : 187-194. - Lundberg DS, Lebeis SL, Paredes SH, Yourstone S, Gehring J, Malfatti S,
et al . 2012. Defining the coreArabidopsis thaliana root microbiome.Nature 488 : 86-90. - Pirttilä AM, Laukkane H, Pospiech H, Myllylã R, Hohtola A. 2000. Detection of intracellular bacteria in buds of Scoth pine (
Pinus sylvestris L.) by in situ hybridization.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66 : 3037-3077. - Younas H, Nazir A, Bareen Fe, Tries JE. 2023. Metabolic profile and molecular characterization of endophytic bacteria isolated from
Pinus sylvestris L. with growth-promoting effect on sunflower.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30 : 40147-40161. - Izumi H, Anderson IC, Killham K, Moore ER. 2008. Diversity of predominant endophytic bacteria in European deciduous and coniferous trees.
Can. J. Microbiol. 54 : 173-179. - Shishido M, Massicotte HB, Chanway CP. 1996. Effect of plant growth promoting
Bacillus strains on pine and spruce seedling growth and mycorrhizal infection.Ann. Bot. 77 : 433-441. - Carrell AA, Frank AC. 2014.
Pinus flexilis andPicea engelmannii share a simple and consistent needle endophyte microbiota with a potential role in nitrogen fixation.Front. Microbiol. 5 : 333. - Durrant T, de Rigo D, Caudullo G. 2016.
Pinus sylvestris in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats, pp. e016b94+.In San-Miguel-Ayanz J, de Rigo D, Caudullo G, Houston Durrant T, Mauri A (eds.),European Atlas of Forest Tree Species . Publ. Off. EU, Luxembourg. - Brichta J, Šimunek V, Bílek L, Vacek Z, Gallo J, Drozdowski S,
et al . 2024. Effects of climate change on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) growth across Europe: decrease of tree-ring fluctuation and amplification of climate stress.Forests 15 : 91. - Dobbertin M, Wermelinger B, Bigler C, Bürgi M, Carron M, Forster B,
et al . 2007. Linking increasing drought stress to Scots pine mortality and bark beetle infestations.Sci. World J. 7 : 231-239. - Aguadé D, Poyatos R, Gómez M, Oliva J, Martínez-Vilalta J. 2015. The role of defoliation and root rot pathogen infection in driving the mode of drought-related physiological decline in Scots pine (
Pinus sylvestris L.).Tree physiol. 35 : 229-242. - Trivedi P, Batista BD, Bazany KE, Singh BK. 2022. Plant-microbiome interactions under a changing world: responses, consequences and perspectives.
New Phytol. 234 : 1951-1959. - Zboralski A, Filion M. 2023.
Pseudomonas spp. can help plants face climate change.Front. Microbiol. 14 : 1198131. - Rajkumar M, Bruno LB, Banu JR. 2017. Alleviation of environmental stress in plants: the role of beneficial
Pseudomonas spp.Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 : 1-36. - Ali SZ, Sandhya V, Grover M, Linga VR, Bandi V. 2011. Effect of inoculation with a thermotolerant plant growth promoting
Pseudomonas putida strain AKMP7 on growth of wheat (Triticum spp.) under heat stress.J. Plant Interact. 6 : 239-246. - Orozco-Mosqueda MdC, Flores A, Rojas-Sánchez B, Urtis-Flores CA, Morales-Cedeño LR, Valencia-Marin MF,
et al . 2021. Plant growth-promoting bacteria as bioinoculants: attributes and challenges for sustainable crop improvement.Agronomy 11 : 1167. - Saglam A, Demiralay M, Colak DN, Gedik NP, Basok O, Kadioglu A. 2022.
Pseudomonas putida KT2440 induces drought tolerance during fruit ripening in tomato.Bioagro. 34 : 139-150. - Grichko VP, Glick BR. 2001. Flooding tolerance of transgenic tomato plants expressing the bacterial enzyme ACC deaminase controlled by the 35S,
rolD or PRB-1b promoter.Plant Physiol. Biochem. 39 : 19-25. - Puri A, Padda KP, Chanway CP. 2020. Sustaining the growth of
Pinaceae trees under nutrient-limited edaphic conditions via plantbeneficial bacteria.PLoS One 15 : e0238055. - Ozkaya MS. 2024. Investigation of the effects of a plant growth regulatory bacterium,
Pseudomonas putida KT2440 strain, on the germination of black pine and scotch pine seeds in different soil mixtures.Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 23 : 149-156. - Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PH, Staley JT, Williams ST. 1994.
Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology , pp. 786-788. 9th. Baltimor: William & Wilkins. - Pei CX, Liu Q, Dong CS, Li HQ, Jiang JB, Gao WJ. 2010. Diversity and abundance of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences in forestomach of alpacas (
Lama pacos ) and sheep (Ovis aries ).Anaerobe 16 : 426-432. - Heuer H, Krsek M, Baker P, Smalla K, Wellington EM. 1997. Analysis of actinomycete communities by specific amplification of genes encoding 16S rRNA and gel-electrophoretic separation in denaturing gradients.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63 : 3233-3241. - Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. 2021. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11.
Mol. Biol. Evol. 38 : 3022-3027. - Subba Rao NS. 1977.
Soil microorganisms and plant growth , pp. 254-255. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi. - Dobereiner J, Marriel IE, Nery M. 1976. Ecological distribution of
Spirillum lipoferum Beijerinck.Can. J. Microbiol. 22 : 1464-1473. - Baldani JI, Reis VM, Videira SS, Boddey LH, Baldani VLD. 2014. The art of isolating nitrogen-fixing bacteria from non-leguminous plants using N-free semi-solid media: a practical guide for microbiologists.
Plant Soil 384 : 413-431. - Pikovskaya R. 1948. Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with vital activity of some microbial species.
Mikrobiologiya 17 : 362-370. - Paul D, Narayan Sinha S. 2013. Phosphate solubilizing activity of some bacterial strains isolated from jute mill effluent exposed water of river Ganga.
Indian J. Fundam. Appl. Life Sci. 3 : 39-45. - Gordon SA, Weber RP. 1951. Colorimetric estimation of indole acetic acid.
Plant Physiol. 26 : 192-195. - Glickmann E, Dessaux Y. 1995. A critical examination of the specificity of the Salkowski reagent for indolic compounds produced by phytopathogenic bacteria.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61 : 793-796. - Patten CL, Glick BR. 2002. Role of
Pseudomonas putida indoleacetic acid in development of the host plant root system.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68 : 3795-3801. - Cappuccino JC, Sherman N. 1992. Negative staining, pp.1464-1473.
In Cappuccino JC, Sherman N (eds.)Microbiology: a laboratory manual . Redwood City, CA, Benjamin, Cummings. - Abdelwahed S, Trabelsi E, Saadouli I, Kouidhi S, Masmoudi AS, Cherif A,
et al . 2022. A new pioneer colorimetric microplate method for the estimation of ammonia production by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR).Main Group Chem. 21 : 55-68. - Schwyn B, Neilands JB. 1987. Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores.
Analytical. Biochem. 160 : 47-56. - Asea P, Kucey R, Stewart J. 1988. Inorganic phosphate solubilization by two
Penicillium species in solution culture and soil.Soil Biol. Biochem. 20 : 459-464. - Castric KF, Castric PA. 1983. Method for rapid detection of cyanogenic bacteria.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45 : 701-702. - Bano N, Musarrat J. 2003. Characterization of a new
Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain NJ-15 as a potential biocontrol agent.Curr. Microbiol. 46 : 324-328. - Zhao X, Song P, Hou D, Li Z, Hu Z. 2021. Antifungal activity, identification and biosynthetic potential analysis of fungi against
Rhizoctonia cerealis .Ann. Microbiol. 71 : 41. - Tariq M, Yasmin S, Hafeez FY. 2010. Biological control of potato black scurf by rhizosphere associated bacteria.
Braz. J. Microbiol. 41 : 439-451. - Minaxi, Saxena J. 2010. Characterization of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa RM-3 as a potential biocontrol agent.Mycopathologia 170 : 181-193. - Gupta PC. 1993. Seed vigour testing, pp. 242-249.
In Agrawal PK (eds.),Handbook of Seed Testing . Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi. - Matthysse AG. 2018. Adherence of bacteria to plant surfaces measured in the laboratory.
J. Vis. Exp. 136 : e56599. - Sivolodskiĭ EP. 2012. The synthetic growth medium King's BS for detection of fluorescein synthesis by
Pseudomonas bacteria.Klin Lab. Diagn. 10 : 60-62. - Peng Y, Tang Y, Li D, Ye J. 2024. The growth-promoting and colonization of the pine endophytic
Pseudomonas abietaniphila for pine wilt disease control.Microorganisms 12 : 1089. - Strzelczyk E, Li CY. 2000. Bacterial endobionts in the big non-mycorrhizal roots of Scots pine (
Pinus sylvestris L.).Microbiol. Res. 155 : 229-232. - Sah S, Krishnani S, Singh R. 2021.
Pseudomonas mediated nutritional and growth promotional activities for sustainable food security.Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2 : 100084. - Weller DM. 2007.
Pseudomonas biocontrol agents of soilborne pathogens: looking back over 30 years.Phytopathology 97 : 250-256. - Khan ZDR, Kintz T, delas Alas M, Yap R, Doty S. 2014. Degradation, phytoprotection and phytoremediation of phenanthrene by endophyte
Pseudomonas putida , PD1.Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 : 1221-1228. - Agisha VN, Eapen SJ, Monica V, Sheoran N, Munjal V, Suseelabhai R,
et al . 2017. Plant endophyticPseudomonas putida BP25 induces expression of defense genes in black pepper roots: deciphering through suppression subtractive hybridization analysis.Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 100 : 106-116. - Asif H, Studholme DJ, Khan A, Aurongzeb M, Khan IA, Azim MK. 2016. Comparative genomics of an endophytic
Pseudomonas putida isolated from mango orchard.Genet. Mol. Biol. 39 : 465-473. - Andreote FD, de Araújo WL, de Azevedo JL, van Elsas JD, da Rocha UN, van Overbeek LS. 2009. Endophytic colonization of potato (
Solanum tuberosum L.) by a novel competent bacterial endophyte,Pseudomonas putida strain P9, and its effect on associated bacterial communities.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75 : 3396-3406. - Kuklinsky-Sobral J, Araújo WL, Mendes R, Pizzirani-Kleiner AA, Azevedo JL. 2005. Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria from soybean (
Glycine max ) grown in soil treated with glyphosate herbicide.Plant Soil 273 : 91-99. - Agbodjato NA, Adoko MY, Babalola OO, Amogou O, Badé FT, Noumavo PA,
et al . 2021. Efficacy of biostimulants formulated withPseudomonas putida and clay, peat, clay-peat binders on maize productivity in a farming environment in Southern Benin.Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 5 : 666718. - Verma SK, Kingsley K, Irizarry I, Bergen M, Kharwar RN, White JF. 2017. Seed‐vectored endophytic bacteria modulate development of rice seedlings.
J. Appl. Microbiol. 122 : 1680-1691. - Palleroni NJ, Bradbury JF. 1993.
Stenotrophomonas , a new bacterial genus forXanthomonas maltophilia (Hugh 1980) Swings et al. 1983.Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 43 : 606-609. - Dunne C, Crowley JJ, Moënne-Loccoz Y, Dowling DN, Bruijn S, O'Gara F. 1997. Biological control of
Pythium ultimum byStenotrophomonas maltophilia W81 is mediated by an extracellular proteolytic activity.Microbiology 143 : 3921-3931. - Abreu-Tarazi MF, Navarrete AA, Andreote FD, Almeida CV, Tsai SM, Almeida MD. 2010. Endophytic bacteria in long-term
in vitro cultivated "axenic" pineapple microplants revealed by PCR-DGGE.World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26 : 555-560. - Zhu B, Liu H, Tian WX, Fan XY, Li B, Zhou XP,
et al . 2012. Genome sequence ofStenotrophomonas maltophilia RR-10, isolated as an endophyte from rice root.J. Bacteriol. 194 : 1280-1281. - Hagaggi NSA, Abdul-Raouf UM. 2022. The endophyte
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia EPS modulates endogenous antioxidant defense in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under cadmium stress.Arch. Microbiol. 204 : 431. - Adeleke BS, Ayangbenro AS, Babalola OO. 2022. Effect of endophytic bacterium,
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia JVB5 on sunflowers.Plant Protect. Sci. 58 : 185-198. - Taghavi S, Garafola C, Monchy S, Newman L, Hoffman A, Weyens N,
et al . 2009. Genome survey and characterization of endophytic bacteria exhibiting a beneficial effect on growth and development of poplar trees.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75 : 748-757. - Behrendt U, Ulrich A, Schumann P, Meyer JM, Spröer C. 2007.
Pseudomonas lurida sp. nov., a fluorescent species as sociated with the phyllosphere of grasses.Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57 : 979-985. - Doty SL, Joubert PM, Firrincieli A, Sher AW, Tournay R, Kill C,
et al . 2023. Potential biocontrol activities ofPopulus endophytes against several plant pathogens using different inhibitory mechanisms.Pathogens 12 : 13. - Girard L, Lood C, Höfte M, Vandamme P, Rokni-Zadeh H, van Noort V,
et al . 2021. The ever-expandingPseudomonas genus: description of 43 new species and partition of thePseudomonas putida group.Microorganisms 9 : 1766. - Wójcik M, Koper P, Żebracki K, Marczak M, Mazur A. 2023. Genomic and metabolic characterization of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolated from nodules of clovers grown in non-farmed soil.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 : 16679. - Etesami H, Alikhani HA, Hosseini HM. 2015. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production trait, a useful screening to select endophytic and rhizosphere competent bacteria for rice growth promoting agents.
MethodsX 2 : 72-78. - Malik DK, Sindhu SS. 2011. Production of indoleacetic acid by
Pseudomonas sp. effect of coinoculation withMesorhizobium sp. cicer on nodulation and plant growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum ).Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 17 : 25-32. - Neha G, Pankaj S, Rana JC, Mohar S. 2021. Detection of plant growth promoting traits in
Pseudomonas lurida AH1 isolated from rhizosphere ofAconitum Heterophyllum wall. ex royle.Green Rep. 2 : 26-31. - Mishra PK, Mishra S, Bisht SC, Selvakumar G, Kundu S, Bisht JK,
et al . 2009. Isolation, molecular characterization and growthpromotion activities of a cold tolerant bacteriumPseudomonas sp. Nars9 (mtcc9002) from the Indian Himalayas.Biol. Res. 42 : 305-313. - Etminani F, Harighi B. 2018. Isolation and identification of endophytic bacteria with plant growth promoting activity and biocontrol potential from wild pistachio trees.
Plant Pathol. J. 34 : 208-217. - Ambawade M, Pathade G. 2013. Production of indole acetic acid (IAA) by
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia BE25 isolated from roots of banana (musa spp.).Int. J. Sci. Res. 4 : 2644-2650. - Berg G. 2009. Plant-microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 84 : 11-18. - Souza Rd, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LM. 2015. Plant growth-promoting bacteria as inoculants in agricultural soils.
Genet. Mol. Biol. 38 : 401-419. - Ahemad M, Kibret M. 2014. Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: current perspective.
J. King Saud. Univ. Sci. 26 : 1-20. - Puri A, Padda KP, Chanway CP. 2017. Plant growth promotion by endophytic bacteria in nonnative crop hosts, pp. 11-45. In Maheshwari D, Annapurna K (eds.)
Endophytes: Crop Productivity and Protection. Sustainable Development and Biodiversity . Springer, Cham. - Costa-Gutierrez SB, Adler C, Espinosa-Urgel M, de Cristóbal RE. 2022.
Pseudomonas putida and its close relatives: mixing and mastering the perfect tune for plants.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 106 : 3351-3367. - Li HB, Singh RK, Singh P, Song QQ, Xing YX, Yang LT,
et al . 2017. Genetic diversity of nitrogen-fixing and plant growth promotingPseudomonas Species isolated from sugarcane rhizosphere.Front. Microbiol. 8 : 1268.3351-3367. - Martin PA, Jayanthi D, Thamizhseran N. 2019. Isolation and Proto-cooperation of
Pseudomonas putida TS 18 from Water Calyx Fluid ofSpathodea campanulata P. Beauv.J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 13 : 2027-2033. - Kumar A, Tripti, Voropaeva O, Maleva M, Panikovskaya K, Borisova G,
et al . 2021. Bioaugmentation with copper tolerant endophytePseudomonas lurida strain EOO26 for improved plant growth and copper phytoremediation byHelianthus annuus .Chemosphere 266 : 128983. - Huda N, Tanvir R, Badar J, Ali I, Rehman Y. 2022. Arsenic-resistant plant growth promoting
Pseudoxanthomonas mexicana S254 andStenotrophomonas maltophilia S255 isolated from agriculture soil contaminated by industrial effluent.Sustainability 14 : 10697. - Abd-Alla MH, Bashandy SR, Nafady NA, Hassan AA. 2018. Enhance mentofexopolysaccharide Production by
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia andBrevibacillus parabrevis isolated from root nodules ofCicera rietinum L. andVigna unguiculata L. (Walp.) plants.Rend. Lincei Sci. Fis. Nat. 29 : 117-129. - Reinhardt EL, Ramos PL, Manfio GP, Barbosa HR, Pavan C, Moreira-Filho CA. 2008. Molecular characterization of nitrogen-fixing bacteria isolated from brazilian agricultural plants at São Paulo state.
Braz. J. Microbiol. 39 : 414-422. - Singh RK, Singh P, Li HB, Guo D J, Song QQ, Yang LT,
et al . 2020. Plant-PGPR plant growth-promoting diazotrophsKosakonia radicincitans BA1 andStenotrophomonas maltophilia COA2 to enhance growth and stress-related gene expression inSaccharum spp.J. Plant Int. 15 : 427-445. - Oteino N, Lally RD, Kiwanuka S, Lloyd A, Ryan D, Germaine KJ, Dowling DN. 2015. Plant growth promotion induced by phosphate solubilizing endophytic
Pseudomonas isolates.Front. Microbiol. 6 : 745. - Stein NV, Eder M, Burr F, Stoss S, Holzner L, Kunz H,
et al . 2023. The RND efflux system ParXY affects siderophore secretion inPseudomonas putida KT2440.Microbiol. Spectr. 11 : e02300-23. - García CA, De Rossi BP, Alcaraz E, Vay C, Franco M. 2012. Siderophores of
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia : detection and determination of their chemical nature.Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 44 : 150-154. - Calvente V, de Orellano ME, Sansone G, Benuzzi D, de Tosetti MS. 2001. Effect of nitrogen source and pH on siderophore production by
Rhodotorula strains and their application to biocontrol of phytopathogenic moulds.J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26 : 226-229. - Kovaleva VA, Shalovylo YI, Gorovik YN, Lagonenko AL, Evtushenkov AN, Gout RT. 2015.
Bacillus pumilus - a new phytopathogen of Scots pine.J. For. Sci. 61 : 131-137. - Jeong H, Choi S, Kloepper JW, Ryu C. 2014. Genome sequence of the plant endophyte
Bacillus pumilus INR7, triggering induced systemic resistance in field crops.Genome Announc. 2 : e01093-14. - Dobrzyński J, Jakubowska Z, Kulkova I, Kowalczyk P, Kramkowski K. 2023. Biocontrol of fungal phytopathogens by
Bacillus pumilus .Front. Microbiol. 14 : 1194606. - Shuai H, Meng Y, Luo X, Chen F, Zhou W, Dai Y,
et al . 2017. Exogenous auxin represses soybean seed germination through decreasing the gibberellin/abscisic acid (GA/ABA) ratio.Sci. Rep. 7 : 12620. - Kumar A, Rithesh L, Kumar V, Raghuvanshi N, Chaudhary K, Abhineet,
et al . 2023.Stenotrophomonas in diversified cropping systems: friend or foe?Front. Microbiol. 14 : 1214680. - Henry PM, Gebben SJ, Tech JJ, Yip JL, Leveau JH. 2016. Inhibition of
Xanthomonas fragariae , causative agent of angular leaf spot of strawberry, through iron deprivation.Front. Microbiol. 7 : 1589. - Pastor N, Masciarelli O, Fischer S, Luna V, Rovera M. 2016. Potential of
Pseudomonas putida PCI2 for the protection of tomato plants against fungal pathogens.Curr. Microbiol. 73 : 346-353. - Oliver C, Hernández I, Caminal M, Lara JM, Fernàndez C. 2019.
Pseudomonas putida strain B2017 produced as technical grade active ingredient controls fungal and bacterial crop diseases.Biocontrol. Sci. Technol. 29 : 1053-1068. - Kumar A, Verma H, Singh VK, Singh PP, Singh SK, Ansari WA, et al. 2017. Role of
Pseudomonas sp. in sustainable agriculture and disease management, pp. 195-215.In Meena VS, Mishra PK, Bisht JK, Pattanayak A (eds.),Agriculturally important microbes for sustainable agriculture. Springer , Singapore. - Aydinoglu F, Iltas O, Akkaya O. 2020. Inoculation of maize seeds with
Pseudomonas putida leads to enhanced seedling growth in combination with modified regulation of miRNAs and antioxidant enzymes.Symbiosis 81 : 271-285. - Nascimento F, Vicente C, Espada M, Bernard Glick R, Mota M, Oliveira S. 2013. Evidence for the involvement of ACC deaminase from
Pseudomonas putida UW4 in the biocontrol of pine wilt disease caused byBursaphelenchus xylophilus .BioControl 58 : 427-433. - Compant S, Clément C, Sessitsch A. 2010. Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo- and endosphere of plants: their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization.
Soil Biol. Biochem. 42 : 669-678. - Espinosa-Urgel M, Salido A, Ramos JL. 2000. Genetic analysis of functions involved in adhesion of
Pseudomonas putida to seeds.J. Bacteriol. 182 : 2363-2369. - Puri A, Padda KP, Chanway CP. 2020.
In vitro andin vivo analyses of plant-growth-promoting potential of bacteria naturally associated with spruce trees growing on nutrient-poor soils.Appl. Soil Ecol. 149 : 103538. - Shishido M, Chanway CP. 2000. Colonization and growth of outplanted spruce seedlings pre-inoculated with plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria in the greenhouse.
Can. J. For. Res. 30 : 848-854.