Articles Service
Research article
Efficient CRISPR-Cas12f1-Mediated Multiplex Bacterial Genome Editing via Low-Temperature Recovery
1Department of Systems Biotechnology and Institute of Microbiomics, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Republic of Korea
2Nakdonggang National Institute of Biological Resources, Sangju 37242, Republic of Korea
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024; 34(7): 1522-1529
Published July 28, 2024 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2403.03033
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Abstract
Keywords
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
CRISPR-Cas system is an immune mechanism of prokaryotes that specifically recognizes and degrades exogenous nucleic acids, genetically protecting the organism [1]. The function of the CRISPR-Cas system is divided between the guide RNA (gRNA) for target nucleic acid recognition and the Cas nuclease for cleavage [1]. This modular system allows for the cleavage of desired nucleotide sequences by modifying the target recognition sequence (TRS) on the gRNA [2], thereby enabling genome editing across various organisms, including microbes [3, 4].
Class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems, featuring a single effector protein, are primarily employed for genome editing. Notably, extensive research has focused on Cas9 derived from
A miniature CRISPR-Cas12f1 system has garnered attention for its potential to address this challenge. Cas12f1 orthologs consist of single polypeptides of around 500 a.a., which are significantly shorter than the length of Cas9 [12]. The Cas12f1 nuclease is known to form a dimer, with each single RuvC domain cutting both strands of the target DNA [13, 14]. The use of Cas12f1 nuclease for single gene editing in the genome has been reported in various organisms, including
Recently, the Cas12f1-mediated simultaneous deletion of two genes was demonstrated in
Materials and Methods
Strains and Culture Conditions
The
Construction of Multiple sgRNA Plasmids
The plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S1. The primers used for plasmid construction are listed in Table S2. PCR amplification was performed using KOD FX (Toyobo, Cat. No. TOKFX-101, Japan), while ligation was conducted using Gibson Assembly Master Mix (NEB, Cat. No. E2611, USA). A dual sgRNA plasmid, pSR052, was constructed by inserting an sgRNA cassette downstream of the spectinomycin resistance gene in the single sgRNA plasmid pHL294. The chloramphenicol resistance gene, amplified from pACYC184, was employed to construct pSR076, replacing the streptomycin resistance gene of pSR052. For the generation of pSR053 and triple sgRNA plasmids (pSR078 and pSR082), sets of primers with different TRS overhangs were used to ensure that each PCR product contained either the origin of replication (
Multiplex Genome Editing via CRISPR-Cas12f1-Mediated Negative Selection
The sequences of the mutagenic oligonucleotides used in the genome editing experiments are listed in Table S3. Mutagenic oligonucleotides (70mer, 500 pmol) and sgRNA plasmid (200 ng) were simultaneously electroporated into competent cells overexpressing Cas12f1 and λ Beta protein. Electroporation was performed under the following conditions: 25 μF, 200 Ω, 1.8 kV, and 0.1 cm electroporation cuvette (Bio-Rad). Immediately after electroporation, 950 μl of SOC medium was added. The cells were recovered at temperatures of 17, 27, and 37°C, shaking at 180 rpm for durations of 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 h. Post-recovery, the cells were plated on MacConkey agar (BD Difco, Cat. No. 281810, USA) and incubated at 30°C for 16–30 h until the colony colors developed completely. To observe fermentation phenotypes, D-galactose (0.5%, CAS No. 59-23-4), D-xylose (0.5%, CAS No. 58-86-6), and D-sorbitol (0.5%, CAS No. 50-70-4) were added to the MacConkey agar as needed.
Assessment of Multiplex Genome Editing Efficiency and Accuracy
To evaluate the in vivo cleavage activity, the transformation efficiencies of pHL308 (sgRNA-deleted plasmid) and a multiple sgRNA plasmid were calculated. The editing efficiency was calculated as the percentage of white colonies to total colonies on MacConkey agar. After conducting three independent experiments, four white colonies were randomly selected to confirm single-nucleotide editing. The target genes were amplified and Sanger sequencing was performed. Successful editing was confirmed only when all target genes were accurately edited in a single colony. The primers used for PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing are listed in Table S2.
Results
Designing Multiplex Genome Editing Using the CRISPR-Cas12f1 System
-
Fig. 1. Multiplex genome editing through Cas12f1-mediated negative selection.
Mutations are introduced into the
galK andxylB genes by oligonucleotides. sgRNAs are expressed from a dual sgRNA plasmid and form a complex with Cas12f1 nuclease. The scaffold sequences of both sgRNAs are identical and indicated by gray lines. Each sgRNA has a targeting region sequence (TRS) specific to eithergalK orxylB . Unedited targets are cleaved by the sgRNA/Cas12f1 complex. However, cells with edited targets are not cleaved, facilitating the identification of edited cells through negative selection.
Effect of Low-Temperature Recovery on Double Target Editing Efficiency
Mutagenic oligonucleotides induce 4 nt substitutions in the
-
Fig. 2. Simultaneous editing of
galK andxylB targets. (A) sgRNAs recognizinggalK andxylB target sequences. Mutations are introduced through oligonucleotides, resulting in changes from 504TAAC to ATCA for thegalK target and from 649GCGA to AACT for thexylB target. Each sgRNA possesses a 20 nt long TRS specific to thegalK orxylB target. Gray boxes indicate PAM sequences and target nucleotides are marked in red. (B) Optimization of recovery temperature for multiplex genome editing. Recovery temperatures of 37, 27, and 17°C were investigated, with varying recovery times at each temperature. Gray and purple bars indicate editing efficiency and the number of surviving cells, respectively.
Simultaneous Triple Target Editing under Low-Temperature Conditions
We aimed to simultaneously edit three targets (
-
Fig. 3. Multiplex three-target genome editing.
(A) Plasmid expressing three sgRNAs (targeting
galK ,xylB , andsrlD , respectively). The triple sgRNA plasmid was designed to avoid the loss of sgRNAs resulting from recombination between repetitive scaffold sequences. Each sgRNA cassette expressesgalK -,xylB -, andsrlD -targeting sgRNAs. (B) Multiplex 4 nt substitution in thegalK ,xylB , andsrlD genes. The efficiencies of editinggalK 504ATCA,xylB 649AACT, andsrlD 323GTTA were compared under two recovery conditions: 1 hour at 37°C and 12 hours at 17°C. (C) Multiplex single-nucleotide substitution in thegalK ,xylB , andsrlD genes. The efficiency of editinggalK 504A,xylB 652T, andsrlD 328T was compared under two recovery conditions: 1 h at 37°C and 12 h at 17°C.
Single-Nucleotide Level Multiplex Genome Editing by 3'-End Truncated sgRNAs
Achieving single-nucleotide editing is challenging because of the mismatch tolerance of the CRISPR-Cas system [23]. To address this problem, the 3'-end of the sgRNA was maximally truncated, as described previously [15]. The triple sgRNA plasmid pSR078 expresses three 3'-end truncated sgRNAs targeting the
-
Fig. 4. Single-nucleotide level multiplex genome editing using 3'-end truncated sgRNAs.
(A) A schematic diagram of simultaneous three-target editing. The 3'-end truncated sgRNA/Cas12f1 complexes cleave unedited target sequences while leaving single-nucleotide-substituted sequences intact. Therefore, cells survive only when editing events occur simultaneously at all three targets. (B) Multiplex single-nucleotide substitution in the
galK ,xylB , andsrlD genes using 3'-end truncated sgRNAs. The efficiencies of editinggalK 504A,xylB 652T, andsrlD 328T using truncated sgRNAs were compared under two recovery conditions: 1 h at 37°C and 12 h at 17°C. (C) Sanger sequencing analysis of the single-nucleotide-edited cells. Four white colonies were randomly selected and the target sequences of thegalK ,xylB , andsrlD genes were analyzed. The target nucleotides are highlighted in color and bold font.
Discussion
The efficiency of individual editing of the
Therefore, this study optimized the recovery temperature to enhance editing efficiency and investigated the effects of both high- and low-temperature conditions on genome editing in
These findings underscore the significance of recovery temperature in CRISPR-Cas-mediated multiplex genome editing. The enhanced efficiency observed with low-temperature recovery can be attributed to several factors. Recovery, a pivotal process in genome editing, enables cells to heal from genetic alterations, including DNA damage and breaks induced by mutagenesis and Cas nucleases. If a double-strand break occurs at an unedited target locus while another target is being edited, it could lead to cell death. Lowering the temperature slows down DNA replication [32], potentially allowing more time for edits to occur across multiple genomic sites. Additionally, lowering the temperature reduces the rates of enzyme biochemical reactions [33]. Therefore, the reduced target cleavage rate by Cas12f1 at lower temperatures may increase the likelihood of obtaining multiplex-edited cells.
The effectiveness of low-temperature recovery in enhancing the efficiency of Cas9-mediated multiplex genome editing was also investigated. Consistent with the targets used in the previous experiment using Cas12f1, the
-
Fig. 5. Multiplex genome editing using CRISPR-Cas9 and low-temperature recovery.
(A) The 5'-end truncated sgRNAs targeting the
galK ,xylB , andsrlD genes. These 5'-end truncated sgRNAs form a complex with Cas9, facilitating the recognition and cleavage of the targets. If a single-nucleotide substitution occurs (galK 504A,xylB 652T, andsrlD 328T), the target is not cleaved. (B) CRISPR-Cas9-mediated multiplex single-nucleotide substitution in thegalK ,xylB , andsrlD genes using 5'-end truncated sgRNAs and low-temperature recovery. The efficiencies of editinggalK 504A,xylB 652T, andsrlD 328T using the 5'-end truncated sgRNAs were compared under two recovery conditions: 1 h at 37°C and 12 h at 17°C. (C) Sanger sequencing analysis of the single-nucleotide-edited cells. Four white colonies were randomly selected and the target sequences of thegalK ,xylB , andsrlD genes were analyzed. The target nucleotides are highlighted in color and bold font. An undesired mutation is indicated by a yellow box.
While 4 nt substitutions were successfully introduced using low-temperature recovery and untruncated sgRNAs (Figs. 2B and 3B), single-nucleotide-edited cells were not obtained (Fig. 3C). Previous studies have reported that using target-mismatched gRNAs [23, 34] or maximally truncated gRNAs [15, 35, 36] could effectively overcome mismatch tolerance and achieve precise genome editing. Therefore, we employed 3'-end truncated sgRNAs to accomplish precise single-nucleotide multiplex genome editing at three different targets (Fig. 4). Moreover, the use of truncated sgRNA enhances target specificity and reduces off-target effects [37].
Sequential CRISPR-Cas-mediated genome editing requires the repeated transformation and removal of multiple plasmids. This one-at-a-time process is laborious and increases the likelihood of additional genetic mutations arising from multiple rounds of cultivation. In contrast, multiplex genome editing saves time and cost by enabling the simultaneous modification of multiple genes to obtain cells with desired genotypes. Overall, this study demonstrates the efficacy of combining low-temperature recovery with truncated sgRNAs for precise Cas12f1-mediated multiplex genome editing, contributing to the advancement of genome editing technologies in the field of microbiology and biotechnology.
Supplemental Materials
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (RS-2024-00342735), and the Chung-Ang University research grant in 2023.
Author Contributions
S.R.L.: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Data curation. H.J.K.: Conceptualization, Data curation. S.J.L.: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
References
- Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, Richards M, Boyaval P, Moineau S,
et al . 2007. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes.Science 315 : 1709-1712. - Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. 2012. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity.
Science 337 : 816-821. - Lee HJ, Lee SJ. 2021. Advances in accurate microbial genome-editing CRISPR technologies.
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31 : 903. - Jeong SH, Lee HJ, Lee SJ. 2023. Recent advances in CRISPR-Cas technologies for synthetic biology.
J. Microbiol. 61 : 13-36. - Knott GJ, Doudna JA. 2018. CRISPR-Cas guides the future of genetic engineering.
Science 361 : 866-869. - Jiang Y, Qian F, Yang J, Liu Y, Dong F, Xu C,
et al . 2017. CRISPR-Cpf1 assisted genome editing ofCorynebacterium glutamicum .Nat. Commun. 8 : 15179. - Cho S, Choe D, Lee E, Kim SC, Palsson B, Cho B-K. 2018. High-level dCas9 expression induces abnormal cell morphology in
Escherichia coli .ACS Synth. Biol. 7 : 1085-1094. - Li W, Huang C, Chen J. 2022. The application of CRISPR/Cas mediated gene editing in synthetic biology: Challenges and optimizations.
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10 : 890155. - Ran FA, Cong L, Yan WX, Scott DA, Gootenberg JS, Kriz AJ,
et al . 2015. In vivo genome editing usingStaphylococcus aureus Cas9.Nature 520 : 186-191. - Yan F, Wang W, Zhang J. 2019. CRISPR-Cas12 and Cas13: the lesser known siblings of CRISPR-Cas9.
Cell Biol. Toxicol 35 : 489-492. - Kumar N, Stanford W, De Solis C, Abraham ND, Dao T-MJ, Thaseen S,
et al . 2018. The development of an AAV-based CRISPR SaCas9 genome editing system that can be delivered to neurons in vivo and regulated via doxycycline and Cre-recombinase.Front. Mol. Neurosci. 11 : 413. - Karvelis T, Bigelyte G, Young JK, Hou Z, Zedaveinyte R, Budre K,
et al . 2020. PAM recognition by miniature CRISPR-Cas12f nucleases triggers programmable double-stranded DNA target cleavage.Nucleic Acids Res. 48 : 5016-5023. - Takeda SN, Nakagawa R, Okazaki S, Hirano H, Kobayashi K, Kusakizako T,
et al . 2021. Structure of the miniature type V-F CRISPRCas effector enzyme.Mol. Cell. 81 : 558-570. - Xiao R, Li Z, Wang S, Han R, Chang L. 2021. Structural basis for substrate recognition and cleavage by the dimerization-dependent CRISPR-Cas12f nuclease.
Nucleic Acids Res. 49 : 4120-4128. - Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Lee SJ. 2023. Miniature CRISPR-Cas12f1-mediated single-nucleotide microbial genome editing using 3'-truncated sgRNA.
CRISPR J. 6 : 52-61. - Okano K, Sato Y, Hizume T, Honda K. 2021. Genome editing by miniature CRISPR/Cas12f1 enzyme in
Escherichia coli .J. Biosci. Bioeng. 132 : 120-124. - Wang Y, Sang S, Zhang X, Tao H, Guan Q, Liu C. 2022. Efficient genome editing by a miniature CRISPR-AsCas12f1 nuclease in
Bacillus anthracis .Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9 : 825493. - Wang Y, Wang Y, Pan D, Yu H, Zhang Y, Chen W,
et al . 2022. Guide RNA engineering enables efficient CRISPR editing with a miniatureSyntrophomonas palmitatica Cas12f1 nuclease.Cell Rep. 40 : 111418. - Guo R, Li Z, Li G, Zhang H, Zhang C, Huo X,
et al . 2023. In vivo treatment of tyrosinaemia with hypercompact Cas12f1.Cell Discov. 9 : 73. - Kim DY, Lee JM, Moon SB, Chin HJ, Park S, Lim Y,
et al . 2022. Efficient CRISPR editing with a hypercompact Cas12f1 and engineered guide RNAs delivered by adeno-associated virus.Nat. Biotechnol. 40 : 94-102. - Kong X, Zhang H, Li G, Wang Z, Kong X, Wang L,
et al . 2023. Engineered CRISPR-OsCas12f1 and RhCas12f1 with robust activities and expanded target range for genome editing.Nat. Commun. 14 : 2046. - Hua H-M, Xu J-F, Huang X-S, Zimin AA, Wang W-F, Lu Y-H. 2024. Low-toxicity and high-efficiency
Streptomyces genome editing tool based on the miniature type V-F CRISPR/Cas nuclease AsCas12f1.J. Agric. Food Chem. 72 : 5358-5367. - Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Lee SJ. 2020. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated pinpoint microbial genome editing aided by target-mismatched sgRNAs.
Genome Res. 30 : 768-775. - Lim SR, Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Lee SJ. 2023. Multiplex single-nucleotide microbial genome editing achieved by CRISPR-Cas9 using 5'-endtruncated sgRNAs.
ACS Synth. Biol. 12 : 2203-2207. - LeBlanc C, Zhang F, Mendez J, Lozano Y, Chatpar K, Irish VF,
et al . 2018. Increased efficiency of targeted mutagenesis by CRISPR/Cas9 in plants using heat stress.Plant J. 93 : 377-386. - Kurokawa S, Rahman H, Yamanaka N, Ishizaki C, Islam S, Aiso T,
et al . 2021. A simple heat treatment increases SpCas9-mediated mutation efficiency in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell Physiol. 62 : 1676-1686. - Blomme J, Develtere W, Köse A, Arraiza Ribera J, Brugmans C, Jaraba-Wallace J,
et al . 2022. The heat is on: a simple method to increase genome editing efficiency in plants.BMC Plant Biol. 22 : 142. - Xiang G, Zhang X, An C, Cheng C, Wang H. 2017. Temperature effect on CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing.
J. Genet. Genom. 44 : 199-205. - Guo Q, Mintier G, Ma-Edmonds M, Storton D, Wang X, Xiao X,
et al . 2018. 'Cold shock' increases the frequency of homology directed repair gene editing in induced pluripotent stem cells.Sci. Rep. 8 : 2080. - Maurissen TL, Woltjen K. 2020. Synergistic gene editing in human iPS cells via cell cycle and DNA repair modulation.
Nat. Commun. 11 : 2876. - Kato S, Fukazawa T, Kubo T. 2021. Low-temperature incubation improves both knock-in and knock-down efficiencies by the CRISPR/Cas9 system in
Xenopus laevis as revealed by quantitative analysis.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 543 : 50-55. - Bhat D, Hauf S, Plessy C, Yokobayashi Y, Pigolotti S. 2022. Speed variations of bacterial replisomes.
eLife 11 : e75884. - Georlette D, Blaise V, Collins T, D'Amico S, Gratia E, Hoyoux A,
et al . 2004. Some like it cold: biocatalysis at low temperatures.FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 28 : 25-42. - Kim HJ, Oh SY, Lee SJ. 2020. Single-base genome editing in
Corynebacterium glutamicum with the help of negative selection by target-mismatched CRISPR/Cpf1.J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30 : 1583. - Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Lee SJ. 2021. Mismatch intolerance of 5'-truncated sgRNAs in CRISPR/Cas9 enables efficient microbial single-base genome editing.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 : 6457. - Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Park Y-J, Lee SJ. 2022. Efficient single-nucleotide microbial genome editing achieved using CRISPR/Cpf1 with maximally 3'-end-truncated crRNAs.
ACS Synth. Biol. 11 : 2134-2143. - Fu Y, Sander JD, Reyon D, Cascio VM, Joung JK. 2014. Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs.
Nat. Biotechnol. 32 : 279-284.
Related articles in JMB
Article
Research article
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024; 34(7): 1522-1529
Published online July 28, 2024 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2403.03033
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Efficient CRISPR-Cas12f1-Mediated Multiplex Bacterial Genome Editing via Low-Temperature Recovery
Se Ra Lim1, Hyun Ju Kim1,2, and Sang Jun Lee1*
1Department of Systems Biotechnology and Institute of Microbiomics, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Republic of Korea
2Nakdonggang National Institute of Biological Resources, Sangju 37242, Republic of Korea
Correspondence to:Sang Jun Lee, sangjlee@cau.ac.kr
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas system is being used as a powerful genome editing tool with developments focused on enhancing its efficiency and accuracy. Recently, the miniature CRISPR-Cas12f1 system, which is small enough to be easily loaded onto various vectors for cellular delivery, has gained attention. In this study, we explored the influence of temperature conditions on multiplex genome editing using CRISPR-Cas12f1 in an Escherichia coli model. It was revealed that when two distinct targets in the genome are edited simultaneously, the editing efficiency can be enhanced by allowing cells to recover at a reduced temperature during the editing process. Additionally, employing 3'-end truncated sgRNAs facilitated the simultaneous single-nucleotide level editing of three targets. Our results underscore the potential of optimizing recovery temperature and sgRNA design protocols in developing more effective and precise strategies for multiplex genome editing across various organisms.
Keywords: Nucleotide editing, multiple targets, recovery temperature, AsCas12f1, truncated guide RNA
Introduction
CRISPR-Cas system is an immune mechanism of prokaryotes that specifically recognizes and degrades exogenous nucleic acids, genetically protecting the organism [1]. The function of the CRISPR-Cas system is divided between the guide RNA (gRNA) for target nucleic acid recognition and the Cas nuclease for cleavage [1]. This modular system allows for the cleavage of desired nucleotide sequences by modifying the target recognition sequence (TRS) on the gRNA [2], thereby enabling genome editing across various organisms, including microbes [3, 4].
Class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems, featuring a single effector protein, are primarily employed for genome editing. Notably, extensive research has focused on Cas9 derived from
A miniature CRISPR-Cas12f1 system has garnered attention for its potential to address this challenge. Cas12f1 orthologs consist of single polypeptides of around 500 a.a., which are significantly shorter than the length of Cas9 [12]. The Cas12f1 nuclease is known to form a dimer, with each single RuvC domain cutting both strands of the target DNA [13, 14]. The use of Cas12f1 nuclease for single gene editing in the genome has been reported in various organisms, including
Recently, the Cas12f1-mediated simultaneous deletion of two genes was demonstrated in
Materials and Methods
Strains and Culture Conditions
The
Construction of Multiple sgRNA Plasmids
The plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S1. The primers used for plasmid construction are listed in Table S2. PCR amplification was performed using KOD FX (Toyobo, Cat. No. TOKFX-101, Japan), while ligation was conducted using Gibson Assembly Master Mix (NEB, Cat. No. E2611, USA). A dual sgRNA plasmid, pSR052, was constructed by inserting an sgRNA cassette downstream of the spectinomycin resistance gene in the single sgRNA plasmid pHL294. The chloramphenicol resistance gene, amplified from pACYC184, was employed to construct pSR076, replacing the streptomycin resistance gene of pSR052. For the generation of pSR053 and triple sgRNA plasmids (pSR078 and pSR082), sets of primers with different TRS overhangs were used to ensure that each PCR product contained either the origin of replication (
Multiplex Genome Editing via CRISPR-Cas12f1-Mediated Negative Selection
The sequences of the mutagenic oligonucleotides used in the genome editing experiments are listed in Table S3. Mutagenic oligonucleotides (70mer, 500 pmol) and sgRNA plasmid (200 ng) were simultaneously electroporated into competent cells overexpressing Cas12f1 and λ Beta protein. Electroporation was performed under the following conditions: 25 μF, 200 Ω, 1.8 kV, and 0.1 cm electroporation cuvette (Bio-Rad). Immediately after electroporation, 950 μl of SOC medium was added. The cells were recovered at temperatures of 17, 27, and 37°C, shaking at 180 rpm for durations of 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 h. Post-recovery, the cells were plated on MacConkey agar (BD Difco, Cat. No. 281810, USA) and incubated at 30°C for 16–30 h until the colony colors developed completely. To observe fermentation phenotypes, D-galactose (0.5%, CAS No. 59-23-4), D-xylose (0.5%, CAS No. 58-86-6), and D-sorbitol (0.5%, CAS No. 50-70-4) were added to the MacConkey agar as needed.
Assessment of Multiplex Genome Editing Efficiency and Accuracy
To evaluate the in vivo cleavage activity, the transformation efficiencies of pHL308 (sgRNA-deleted plasmid) and a multiple sgRNA plasmid were calculated. The editing efficiency was calculated as the percentage of white colonies to total colonies on MacConkey agar. After conducting three independent experiments, four white colonies were randomly selected to confirm single-nucleotide editing. The target genes were amplified and Sanger sequencing was performed. Successful editing was confirmed only when all target genes were accurately edited in a single colony. The primers used for PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing are listed in Table S2.
Results
Designing Multiplex Genome Editing Using the CRISPR-Cas12f1 System
-
Figure 1. Multiplex genome editing through Cas12f1-mediated negative selection.
Mutations are introduced into the
galK andxylB genes by oligonucleotides. sgRNAs are expressed from a dual sgRNA plasmid and form a complex with Cas12f1 nuclease. The scaffold sequences of both sgRNAs are identical and indicated by gray lines. Each sgRNA has a targeting region sequence (TRS) specific to eithergalK orxylB . Unedited targets are cleaved by the sgRNA/Cas12f1 complex. However, cells with edited targets are not cleaved, facilitating the identification of edited cells through negative selection.
Effect of Low-Temperature Recovery on Double Target Editing Efficiency
Mutagenic oligonucleotides induce 4 nt substitutions in the
-
Figure 2. Simultaneous editing of
galK andxylB targets. (A) sgRNAs recognizinggalK andxylB target sequences. Mutations are introduced through oligonucleotides, resulting in changes from 504TAAC to ATCA for thegalK target and from 649GCGA to AACT for thexylB target. Each sgRNA possesses a 20 nt long TRS specific to thegalK orxylB target. Gray boxes indicate PAM sequences and target nucleotides are marked in red. (B) Optimization of recovery temperature for multiplex genome editing. Recovery temperatures of 37, 27, and 17°C were investigated, with varying recovery times at each temperature. Gray and purple bars indicate editing efficiency and the number of surviving cells, respectively.
Simultaneous Triple Target Editing under Low-Temperature Conditions
We aimed to simultaneously edit three targets (
-
Figure 3. Multiplex three-target genome editing.
(A) Plasmid expressing three sgRNAs (targeting
galK ,xylB , andsrlD , respectively). The triple sgRNA plasmid was designed to avoid the loss of sgRNAs resulting from recombination between repetitive scaffold sequences. Each sgRNA cassette expressesgalK -,xylB -, andsrlD -targeting sgRNAs. (B) Multiplex 4 nt substitution in thegalK ,xylB , andsrlD genes. The efficiencies of editinggalK 504ATCA,xylB 649AACT, andsrlD 323GTTA were compared under two recovery conditions: 1 hour at 37°C and 12 hours at 17°C. (C) Multiplex single-nucleotide substitution in thegalK ,xylB , andsrlD genes. The efficiency of editinggalK 504A,xylB 652T, andsrlD 328T was compared under two recovery conditions: 1 h at 37°C and 12 h at 17°C.
Single-Nucleotide Level Multiplex Genome Editing by 3'-End Truncated sgRNAs
Achieving single-nucleotide editing is challenging because of the mismatch tolerance of the CRISPR-Cas system [23]. To address this problem, the 3'-end of the sgRNA was maximally truncated, as described previously [15]. The triple sgRNA plasmid pSR078 expresses three 3'-end truncated sgRNAs targeting the
-
Figure 4. Single-nucleotide level multiplex genome editing using 3'-end truncated sgRNAs.
(A) A schematic diagram of simultaneous three-target editing. The 3'-end truncated sgRNA/Cas12f1 complexes cleave unedited target sequences while leaving single-nucleotide-substituted sequences intact. Therefore, cells survive only when editing events occur simultaneously at all three targets. (B) Multiplex single-nucleotide substitution in the
galK ,xylB , andsrlD genes using 3'-end truncated sgRNAs. The efficiencies of editinggalK 504A,xylB 652T, andsrlD 328T using truncated sgRNAs were compared under two recovery conditions: 1 h at 37°C and 12 h at 17°C. (C) Sanger sequencing analysis of the single-nucleotide-edited cells. Four white colonies were randomly selected and the target sequences of thegalK ,xylB , andsrlD genes were analyzed. The target nucleotides are highlighted in color and bold font.
Discussion
The efficiency of individual editing of the
Therefore, this study optimized the recovery temperature to enhance editing efficiency and investigated the effects of both high- and low-temperature conditions on genome editing in
These findings underscore the significance of recovery temperature in CRISPR-Cas-mediated multiplex genome editing. The enhanced efficiency observed with low-temperature recovery can be attributed to several factors. Recovery, a pivotal process in genome editing, enables cells to heal from genetic alterations, including DNA damage and breaks induced by mutagenesis and Cas nucleases. If a double-strand break occurs at an unedited target locus while another target is being edited, it could lead to cell death. Lowering the temperature slows down DNA replication [32], potentially allowing more time for edits to occur across multiple genomic sites. Additionally, lowering the temperature reduces the rates of enzyme biochemical reactions [33]. Therefore, the reduced target cleavage rate by Cas12f1 at lower temperatures may increase the likelihood of obtaining multiplex-edited cells.
The effectiveness of low-temperature recovery in enhancing the efficiency of Cas9-mediated multiplex genome editing was also investigated. Consistent with the targets used in the previous experiment using Cas12f1, the
-
Figure 5. Multiplex genome editing using CRISPR-Cas9 and low-temperature recovery.
(A) The 5'-end truncated sgRNAs targeting the
galK ,xylB , andsrlD genes. These 5'-end truncated sgRNAs form a complex with Cas9, facilitating the recognition and cleavage of the targets. If a single-nucleotide substitution occurs (galK 504A,xylB 652T, andsrlD 328T), the target is not cleaved. (B) CRISPR-Cas9-mediated multiplex single-nucleotide substitution in thegalK ,xylB , andsrlD genes using 5'-end truncated sgRNAs and low-temperature recovery. The efficiencies of editinggalK 504A,xylB 652T, andsrlD 328T using the 5'-end truncated sgRNAs were compared under two recovery conditions: 1 h at 37°C and 12 h at 17°C. (C) Sanger sequencing analysis of the single-nucleotide-edited cells. Four white colonies were randomly selected and the target sequences of thegalK ,xylB , andsrlD genes were analyzed. The target nucleotides are highlighted in color and bold font. An undesired mutation is indicated by a yellow box.
While 4 nt substitutions were successfully introduced using low-temperature recovery and untruncated sgRNAs (Figs. 2B and 3B), single-nucleotide-edited cells were not obtained (Fig. 3C). Previous studies have reported that using target-mismatched gRNAs [23, 34] or maximally truncated gRNAs [15, 35, 36] could effectively overcome mismatch tolerance and achieve precise genome editing. Therefore, we employed 3'-end truncated sgRNAs to accomplish precise single-nucleotide multiplex genome editing at three different targets (Fig. 4). Moreover, the use of truncated sgRNA enhances target specificity and reduces off-target effects [37].
Sequential CRISPR-Cas-mediated genome editing requires the repeated transformation and removal of multiple plasmids. This one-at-a-time process is laborious and increases the likelihood of additional genetic mutations arising from multiple rounds of cultivation. In contrast, multiplex genome editing saves time and cost by enabling the simultaneous modification of multiple genes to obtain cells with desired genotypes. Overall, this study demonstrates the efficacy of combining low-temperature recovery with truncated sgRNAs for precise Cas12f1-mediated multiplex genome editing, contributing to the advancement of genome editing technologies in the field of microbiology and biotechnology.
Supplemental Materials
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (RS-2024-00342735), and the Chung-Ang University research grant in 2023.
Author Contributions
S.R.L.: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Data curation. H.J.K.: Conceptualization, Data curation. S.J.L.: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
Fig 1.
Fig 2.
Fig 3.
Fig 4.
Fig 5.
References
- Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, Richards M, Boyaval P, Moineau S,
et al . 2007. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes.Science 315 : 1709-1712. - Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. 2012. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity.
Science 337 : 816-821. - Lee HJ, Lee SJ. 2021. Advances in accurate microbial genome-editing CRISPR technologies.
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31 : 903. - Jeong SH, Lee HJ, Lee SJ. 2023. Recent advances in CRISPR-Cas technologies for synthetic biology.
J. Microbiol. 61 : 13-36. - Knott GJ, Doudna JA. 2018. CRISPR-Cas guides the future of genetic engineering.
Science 361 : 866-869. - Jiang Y, Qian F, Yang J, Liu Y, Dong F, Xu C,
et al . 2017. CRISPR-Cpf1 assisted genome editing ofCorynebacterium glutamicum .Nat. Commun. 8 : 15179. - Cho S, Choe D, Lee E, Kim SC, Palsson B, Cho B-K. 2018. High-level dCas9 expression induces abnormal cell morphology in
Escherichia coli .ACS Synth. Biol. 7 : 1085-1094. - Li W, Huang C, Chen J. 2022. The application of CRISPR/Cas mediated gene editing in synthetic biology: Challenges and optimizations.
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10 : 890155. - Ran FA, Cong L, Yan WX, Scott DA, Gootenberg JS, Kriz AJ,
et al . 2015. In vivo genome editing usingStaphylococcus aureus Cas9.Nature 520 : 186-191. - Yan F, Wang W, Zhang J. 2019. CRISPR-Cas12 and Cas13: the lesser known siblings of CRISPR-Cas9.
Cell Biol. Toxicol 35 : 489-492. - Kumar N, Stanford W, De Solis C, Abraham ND, Dao T-MJ, Thaseen S,
et al . 2018. The development of an AAV-based CRISPR SaCas9 genome editing system that can be delivered to neurons in vivo and regulated via doxycycline and Cre-recombinase.Front. Mol. Neurosci. 11 : 413. - Karvelis T, Bigelyte G, Young JK, Hou Z, Zedaveinyte R, Budre K,
et al . 2020. PAM recognition by miniature CRISPR-Cas12f nucleases triggers programmable double-stranded DNA target cleavage.Nucleic Acids Res. 48 : 5016-5023. - Takeda SN, Nakagawa R, Okazaki S, Hirano H, Kobayashi K, Kusakizako T,
et al . 2021. Structure of the miniature type V-F CRISPRCas effector enzyme.Mol. Cell. 81 : 558-570. - Xiao R, Li Z, Wang S, Han R, Chang L. 2021. Structural basis for substrate recognition and cleavage by the dimerization-dependent CRISPR-Cas12f nuclease.
Nucleic Acids Res. 49 : 4120-4128. - Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Lee SJ. 2023. Miniature CRISPR-Cas12f1-mediated single-nucleotide microbial genome editing using 3'-truncated sgRNA.
CRISPR J. 6 : 52-61. - Okano K, Sato Y, Hizume T, Honda K. 2021. Genome editing by miniature CRISPR/Cas12f1 enzyme in
Escherichia coli .J. Biosci. Bioeng. 132 : 120-124. - Wang Y, Sang S, Zhang X, Tao H, Guan Q, Liu C. 2022. Efficient genome editing by a miniature CRISPR-AsCas12f1 nuclease in
Bacillus anthracis .Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9 : 825493. - Wang Y, Wang Y, Pan D, Yu H, Zhang Y, Chen W,
et al . 2022. Guide RNA engineering enables efficient CRISPR editing with a miniatureSyntrophomonas palmitatica Cas12f1 nuclease.Cell Rep. 40 : 111418. - Guo R, Li Z, Li G, Zhang H, Zhang C, Huo X,
et al . 2023. In vivo treatment of tyrosinaemia with hypercompact Cas12f1.Cell Discov. 9 : 73. - Kim DY, Lee JM, Moon SB, Chin HJ, Park S, Lim Y,
et al . 2022. Efficient CRISPR editing with a hypercompact Cas12f1 and engineered guide RNAs delivered by adeno-associated virus.Nat. Biotechnol. 40 : 94-102. - Kong X, Zhang H, Li G, Wang Z, Kong X, Wang L,
et al . 2023. Engineered CRISPR-OsCas12f1 and RhCas12f1 with robust activities and expanded target range for genome editing.Nat. Commun. 14 : 2046. - Hua H-M, Xu J-F, Huang X-S, Zimin AA, Wang W-F, Lu Y-H. 2024. Low-toxicity and high-efficiency
Streptomyces genome editing tool based on the miniature type V-F CRISPR/Cas nuclease AsCas12f1.J. Agric. Food Chem. 72 : 5358-5367. - Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Lee SJ. 2020. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated pinpoint microbial genome editing aided by target-mismatched sgRNAs.
Genome Res. 30 : 768-775. - Lim SR, Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Lee SJ. 2023. Multiplex single-nucleotide microbial genome editing achieved by CRISPR-Cas9 using 5'-endtruncated sgRNAs.
ACS Synth. Biol. 12 : 2203-2207. - LeBlanc C, Zhang F, Mendez J, Lozano Y, Chatpar K, Irish VF,
et al . 2018. Increased efficiency of targeted mutagenesis by CRISPR/Cas9 in plants using heat stress.Plant J. 93 : 377-386. - Kurokawa S, Rahman H, Yamanaka N, Ishizaki C, Islam S, Aiso T,
et al . 2021. A simple heat treatment increases SpCas9-mediated mutation efficiency in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell Physiol. 62 : 1676-1686. - Blomme J, Develtere W, Köse A, Arraiza Ribera J, Brugmans C, Jaraba-Wallace J,
et al . 2022. The heat is on: a simple method to increase genome editing efficiency in plants.BMC Plant Biol. 22 : 142. - Xiang G, Zhang X, An C, Cheng C, Wang H. 2017. Temperature effect on CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing.
J. Genet. Genom. 44 : 199-205. - Guo Q, Mintier G, Ma-Edmonds M, Storton D, Wang X, Xiao X,
et al . 2018. 'Cold shock' increases the frequency of homology directed repair gene editing in induced pluripotent stem cells.Sci. Rep. 8 : 2080. - Maurissen TL, Woltjen K. 2020. Synergistic gene editing in human iPS cells via cell cycle and DNA repair modulation.
Nat. Commun. 11 : 2876. - Kato S, Fukazawa T, Kubo T. 2021. Low-temperature incubation improves both knock-in and knock-down efficiencies by the CRISPR/Cas9 system in
Xenopus laevis as revealed by quantitative analysis.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 543 : 50-55. - Bhat D, Hauf S, Plessy C, Yokobayashi Y, Pigolotti S. 2022. Speed variations of bacterial replisomes.
eLife 11 : e75884. - Georlette D, Blaise V, Collins T, D'Amico S, Gratia E, Hoyoux A,
et al . 2004. Some like it cold: biocatalysis at low temperatures.FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 28 : 25-42. - Kim HJ, Oh SY, Lee SJ. 2020. Single-base genome editing in
Corynebacterium glutamicum with the help of negative selection by target-mismatched CRISPR/Cpf1.J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30 : 1583. - Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Lee SJ. 2021. Mismatch intolerance of 5'-truncated sgRNAs in CRISPR/Cas9 enables efficient microbial single-base genome editing.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 : 6457. - Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Park Y-J, Lee SJ. 2022. Efficient single-nucleotide microbial genome editing achieved using CRISPR/Cpf1 with maximally 3'-end-truncated crRNAs.
ACS Synth. Biol. 11 : 2134-2143. - Fu Y, Sander JD, Reyon D, Cascio VM, Joung JK. 2014. Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs.
Nat. Biotechnol. 32 : 279-284.