Articles Service
Review
Plant-Based Decellularization: A Novel Approach for Perfusion-Compatible Tissue Engineering Structures
1Department of Convergence Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (CALS), Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea
2Interdisciplinary Program in IT-Bio Convergence System, Chonnam National University, Republic of Korea
3Department of Advanced Biomaterials Research, Korea Institute of Materials Science (KIMS), Changwon 51508, Republic of Korea
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024; 34(5): 1003-1016
Published May 28, 2024 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2401.01024
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Abstract
Keywords
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
Tissue engineering has emerged as a groundbreaking field that seamlessly integrates materials science, mechanical engineering, clinical medicine, and genetics to revolutionize regenerative medicine [1]. Central to this transformative domain is the intricate interplay of porous three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds meticulously designed to create an optimal environment for tissue and organ regeneration [2]. The selection of scaffold materials has become a critical factor that requires consideration of biocompatibility, biodegradability and mechanical properties. To push the boundaries of conventional tissue engineering, researchers are increasingly exploring innovative solutions. One of these promising avenues involves the incorporation of natural biopolymers [3]. This article explores the burgeoning field of plant-based decellularization, an innovative approach poised to redefine the landscape of scaffold design and tissue engineering [4]. Tissue engineering, at its core, relies on a complex synergy of different scientific disciplines, ranging from materials science to genetics [4]. The aim of this field is to exploit the regenerative potential of living cells to repair or regenerate damaged tissues and organs caused by diseases or trauma. The utilization of 3D scaffolds plays a pivotal role in providing a supportive microenvironment for cellular growth and tissue formation, which is central to tissue engineering [5, 6].
Various of scaffolds made from different materials using different production methods have been used to rebuild a spectrum of tissues and organs within the human body [7]. Critical considerations in scaffold design include biocompatibility, biodegradability, mechanical properties, scaffold architecture, and manufacturing technologies [8]. The ideal scaffold should mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM) of native tissues and provide insights to guide cell behavior and tissue regeneration [9]. Incorporation of natural biopolymers derived from both animal and plant sources has gained prominence due to their potential influence on cell behavior and biocompatibility. However, problems such as poor mechanical properties and rapid biodegradability have prompted researchers to refine these biomaterials. Among the myriad natural sources, plant-based polymers have attracted attention due to their sustainability, abundance, and cost-effectiveness [10]. Plants and plant-derived materials offer a unique opportunity to revolutionize tissue engineering. This article focuses on an innovative approach to plant-based decellularization, a process involving the removal of cellular components from plant structure, leaving behind acellular scaffolds. The advantages of this approach are numerous, starting with the abundance and rapid growth of a large number of plant species, providing a cost-effective and sustainable source of scaffold materials [3].
In addition, while the low cost and abundant sources of plant-based materials are highlighted, it's essential to underscore their unique chemical and structural properties that can offer tailored interactions with cells, potentially enhancing scaffold functionality and biocompatibility. Additionally, the renewable nature of plant resources aligns with sustainable practices, making plant-based decellularization an environmentally conscious choice in tissue engineering advancements (Fig. 1).
-
Fig. 1. Illustrative depiction of the transformative potential of plant-based decellularization in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering.
This schematic encapsulates the intricate process of scaffold development, modification, and vascularization, highlighting the eco-friendly and cost-effective nature of plant-derived materials.
Natural biopolymers derived from plants, including proteins, carbohydrates, lignin, and extracts, offer a variety of [11] scaffold assembly options [12]. Their biocompatibility, coupled with their ability to shape cell behavior through chemical signals, make them promising candidates for tissue engineering applications [13]. However, their inherent limitations, such as poor mechanical properties and rapid biodegradability, have spurred researchers to explore innovative strategies. Post-spinning cross-linking, a procedure addressing the mechanical limitations by enhancing the structural integrity of natural biopolymers, is a notable approach [14]. In addition, blending natural polymers with synthetic counterparts has shown promise in overcoming these challenges, potentially yielding ideal scaffolds for tissue engineering applications [15]. Synthesizing natural and synthetic elements is crucial for the development of scaffolds that balance biocompatibility, mechanical strength and durability. Traditionally, animal-derived tissues have been the primary source of decellularized scaffolds, but they are limited in terms of cost, availability, and ethics [16]. Plant-based decellularization has emerged as a sustainable and scalable alternative. Furthermore, recent advancements in the development of 3D in vitro biomimetic tissue models using hydrogel-based biomaterials have garnered significant attention in tissue engineering research. Hydrogels, known for their biomimetic properties mirroring the native tissue microenvironment, offer a promising platform for creating intricate tissue structures in vitro . However, challenges persist in achieving optimal mechanical strength solely through natural polymers for scaffold fabrication. Novel scaffold fabrication methods, such as indirect 3D-bioprinting technology utilizing natural polymers like silk fibroin, have emerged to address these limitations. These approaches enable the creation of biocompatible scaffolds with tunable mechanical properties, offering versatility for various tissue engineering applications. As example, the use of plant scaffolds offers significant advantages over existing biomaterials, particularly in addressing vascularization efforts and associated difficulties. Leveraging existing plant vascular systems as blood vessels simplifies the process of vascularization in tissue engineering [11]. This approach streamlines the establishment of functional vasculature in engineered tissues, reducing complexities and enhancing overall feasibility. Thus, incorporating plant scaffolds into tissue engineering strategies represents a promising avenue for overcoming challenges related to vascularization. Decellularization involves the removal of cellular components from a tissue or organ, leaving behind an acellular scaffold composed of ECM [17]. The unique advantage of plant-based decellularization lies in the inherent similarities between plant and animal vascular network structures. According to Murray’s law, plants have a tapered, branching network reminiscent of the human cardiovascular system. Leveraging these similarities offers a novel strategy for creating perfusable scaffolds for tissue engineering [18].
Plant-based decellularization involves the application of decellularization techniques to various plant species and tissues, resulting in the generation of acellular, pre-vascularized tissue engineering scaffolds [19]. In addition to cost-effectiveness and sustainability, creating perfusable structures addresses a critical limitation in current bio-engineering approaches, i.e. the lack of functional vascular networks [20]. Current bioengineering techniques face challenges in the creation of patent perfusion vessels, limiting the size of grafts that can be engineered while maintaining viability. Plant-based decellularization represents a paradigm shift in the use of the intricate vascular networks of plants to create scaffolds that support perfusion [21]. This innovation has a significant promise for the development of tissue engineering solutions in clinical practice. Recognizing the broader implications of this approach is essential for understanding the intricacies of plant-based decellularization [22]. The advantages extend beyond the limitations of current bioengineering techniques. The abundance and rapid growth of plant species is a readily available and cost-effective source of scaffold materials in line with the principles of sustainability and green chemistry [10]. Moreover, while much attention has been given to using the plant itself as a scaffold after decellularization, exploring the properties of plant-based hydrogels and their cross-linking methods could offer valuable insights for future applications. Plant-based hydrogels, with their unique structural characteristics and biocompatibility, hold significant promise in tissue engineering. Understanding the cross-linking mechanisms and manipulation techniques of these hydrogels is crucial for optimizing their mechanical properties and biodegradability in scaffold design. In subsequent sections, we will delve into the properties and potential applications of plant-based hydrogels, shedding light on their role in advancing tissue engineering methodologies.
The field of tissue engineering is at the precipice of a transformative breakthrough in plant-based decellularization [23]. Utilization of plant-derived materials, coupled with innovative decellularization techniques, opens new frontiers in scaffold design [24]. The possibility of creating perfusable structures and overcoming the challenges of vascularization holds promise for advancing tissue engineering solutions. In the following sections, we unravel the intricacies of plant-based decellularization and provide a comprehensive understanding of its potential, challenges and implications for the future of regenerative medicine. The specific objective of this study is to comprehensively explore the potential of plant-based decellularization as a revolutionary approach for generating perfusable tissue engineering structures. In the following sections, we unravel the diverse roles of plant-based polymers, assess the advantages and challenges associated with plant-derived scaffold materials, and discuss the implications of this innovative technique in overcoming current tissue engineering limitations. Additionally, it's imperative to compare and explain the pros and cons of plant-based and existing polymer-based biomaterials in terms of materials. While plant-based materials offer sustainability, unique chemical properties, and potential cost-effectiveness, existing polymer-based biomaterials may offer superior mechanical properties and a longer degradation profile. Understanding these differences is crucial in selecting the most suitable materials for specific tissue engineering applications. Therefore, in subsequent sections, we will delve into a comparative analysis of plant-based and polymer-based biomaterials to provide a comprehensive understanding of their respective advantages and limitations in scaffold design and tissue engineering. Moreover, exploring the effect of certain plants on regenerating specific tissues could provide valuable insights into tissue engineering. Plants possess a rich array of bioactive compounds that may influence tissue regeneration in unique ways. Future research could investigate the specific effects of plant-derived compounds on tissue regeneration and tailor scaffold designs accordingly to enhance tissue-specific regeneration outcomes. So that, future research will explore the potential of plant-based materials in influencing tissue-specific regeneration processes and discuss avenues for further research in this area.
Development of Plant Decellularization
Plant decellularization has emerged as a transformative and sustainable approach in the dynamic landscape of tissue engineering, promising to redefine conventional scaffold design [25]. This novel technique involves the meticulous removal of cellular components from plant structures, yielding acellular scaffolds rich in ECM composition [9]. Plant-based decellularization is inspired by the traditional methods applied to animal tissues and exploits the distinctive advantages of plants. Scientists have increasingly focused on plant-derived polymers, looking for abundant, sustainable, and cost-effective scaffold materials that include proteins, carbohydrates, lignin, and extracts. However, challenges, such as poor mechanical properties and rapid biodegradability, have led to the investigation of innovative strategies, such as post-spinning cross-linking and blending natural polymers with synthetic polymers. At the core of the transformative potential of plant-based decellularization is its ability to generate acellular, pre-vascularized tissue engineering scaffolds, addressing limitations associated with traditional animal-derived tissues, including cost, availability, and ethical considerations [26]. The inherent similarities between plant and animal vascular network structures provide a unique avenue for creating perfusable scaffolds, crucial for establishing functional vascular networks in tissue engineering [7]. This burgeoning field extends beyond the resolution of the challenges posed by current bioengineering techniques since the abundant and rapid growth of various plant species makes them readily available and cost-effective sources of scaffold materials, which is consistent with sustainability principles [27].
As researchers explore the intricacies of plant-based decellularization, the potential to create perfusable tissue engineering structures is becoming more and more evident, leading to transformative applications in regenerative medicine. Recent studies exploring a spectrum of plant species and tissues and applying decellularization techniques to generate acellular scaffolds highlight the potential of this method in overcoming the challenges associated with current bioengineering approaches [28]. This innovative technique has significant promise for advancing tissue engineering solutions in clinical applications and addressing the growing demand for effective regenerative treatments [9].
Holistic exploration of plant-based decellularization is complemented by numerous studies that provide insights into the potential of plant-based polymers for tissue-engineering applications, comprehensive analysis, and understanding [21]. These references highlight the depth and breadth of plant-based decellularization research. The development of plant decellularization is a testament to the ongoing evolution of tissue engineering, with researchers embracing the unique attributes of plant-derived materials and innovative decellularization techniques to open new frontiers in scaffold design [29]. The potential to create perfusable structures, together with addressing the challenges of vascularization, holds great promise for the development of novel tissue engineering solutions. As we explore the intricate details of plant-based decellularization, we gain a deeper understanding of its potential, challenges, and transformative implications for the future of regenerative medicine.
Modulevsky
-
Fig. 2. Apple-derived cellulose scaffold generation for 3D mammalian cell culture.
McIntosh red apples were subjected to a controlled drying process at 220°C for up to 5 min to rigidify the outer hypanthium tissue. Following this, the apples underwent precise slicing using a mandolin slicer, ensuring thin and uniform sections while removing the cores. Subsequently, uniform segments measuring 2.0 × 0.5 cm were excised from the sliced apples and individually placed in microcentrifuge tubes for further processing. Decellularization of these apple segments ensued, involving the removal of cellular components while preserving the structural integrity of the cellulose matrix. Post-decellularization, the segments underwent surface modification with various chemistries. These modifications included coating with Type 1 collagen, chemical cross-linking using glutaraldehyde, or incubation in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).The treated segments, now transformed into scaffolds, were introduced into mammalian cell culture medium (DMEM) and incubated for 12 h under standard tissue culture conditions (37°C, 5% CO2). This incubation period allowed for equilibration and preparation of the scaffolds for subsequent cell seeding. For cell seeding, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-coated 24-well plates were utilized, with each well containing 40 ml of cell suspension. The seeded scaffolds were incubated for 6 h to facilitate cell attachment and initial colonization. Subsequently, the wells were filled with DMEM and maintained for up to 12 weeks, providing an extended culture period to assess cell growth, viability, and functionality within the scaffolds. (Reproduced, with permission, copyright 2014, PLOS).
Crucial Aspects of Scaffold Fabrication
Fabrication of scaffolds is pivotal in tissue engineering and influences the success of regenerative medicine applications. This article provides an in-depth exploration of the essential aspects of scaffold fabrication, illuminating key factors that influence their design, functionality, and overall effectiveness in tissue engineering.
(a) Material Selection
The choice of material for scaffold fabrication is paramount and must be aligned with the specific tissue or organ application [30]. Critical factors such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, and mechanical properties significantly influence this selection process.
(b) Structural Design
Structural design, including aspects such as pore size, interconnectivity, and overall architecture, substantially influences cell behavior and tissue regeneration. Emerging research, including the work, explores advanced structural designs that mimic the native ECM, fostering improved cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation [31].
(c) Manufacturing Techniques
Various manufacturing techniques, such as electrospinning, 3D printing and freeze-drying, are employed in scaffold fabrication. Comparative analyses of these techniques offer insights into their respective strengths and limitations, aiding researchers in selecting the most suitable method for their specific needs [32].
(d) Surface Modification
Surface modification of scaffolds can enhance bioactivity and cell–scaffold interactions [33]. Strategies such as biomolecule coating or bioactive nanoparticle incorporation are explored, highlighting the importance of surface modification in scaffold tailoring for specific tissue environments.
(e) Biological Functionalization
Incorporating biological cues into scaffolds is crucial for tissue regeneration. The role of biological functionalization in scaffold fabrication, emphasizes the integration of growth factors, peptides, and other signaling molecules [34].
(f) Quality Control and Standardization
Ensuring the reproducibility and consistency of scaffold fabrication is crucial for clinical translation. The importance of quality control measures and standardization protocols for scaffold fabrication, addressing challenges, and proposing guidelines for maintaining manufacturing reproducibility is critical [35].
In addition, the production of scaffolds for tissue engineering presents a number of challenges and considerations that must be carefully addressed to achieve successful outcomes. These challenges summarized below emphasize the intricacies of scaffold preparation and their impact on various aspects of tissue engineering.
(i) Scaffolding Methods, Tissue Types, and Applications
Scaffold preparation raises critical issues related to pore size, focusing on specific cell types and engineered tissues. The choice of scaffolding methods is closely linked to the intended tissue application and requires scalability for clinical and commercial use. The development of scalable manufacturing processes in accordance with good manufacturing practice (GMP) standards is crucial for the clinical application of tissue engineering approaches [15]. These considerations extend to product delivery, storage and off-the-shelf availability, taking into account clinicians’ preferences for ease of use.
(ii) Biodegradability and Biocompatibility
Biodegradability and biocompatibility are essential properties for cell adhesion and propagation. Cytocompatibility testing, in vivo formulation evaluation and analyses of bioactivity and biocompatibility are essential. Scaffolds should induce a minimal immune response after grafting in order to avoid an inflammatory response that may hinder healing [36]. The choice of materials, including plant-based sources, has been explored for their favorable properties, such as high biocompatibility and bioactivity, making them suitable for tissue engineering.
(iii) Mechanical Property
Scaffold mechanical properties must align with the anatomical site of implantation, necessitating strength for surgical handling during grafting [23]. Tailoring mechanical integrity is a significant challenge, particularly in cardiovascular and orthopedic applications where long-term mechanical support is crucial. To ensure both cellular infiltration and vascularization, achieving a balance between mechanical characteristics and porous architecture is critical [37].
(iv) Architecture
The structural architecture of scaffolds requires an interconnected pore structure and high porosity [27]. This facilitates cellular penetration, nutrient dispersal, and waste product diffusion. The size of the pores must strike a delicate balance to allow cell migration while maintaining specificity for appropriate ligand binding [38]. A porous interconnected structure is necessary for the elimination of waste products without hindering the surrounding tissues.
(v) Clinical Status Evaluation
Clinical evaluation is essential to validate scaffold efficacy [10]. Micro-computed tomography imaging and histological analyses are performed to assess organ defect repair. Challenges include limited sample sizes, lack of randomized control groups, and long-term study limitations [21]. Overcoming these limitations is necessary to detect rare adverse events and assess the long-term benefits of interventions.
Modification of Decellularized Plant Tissues
Modification of decellularized plant tissues is at the forefront of advances in tissue engineering, reflecting a transformative strategy in dynamic regenerative medicine. Decellularization, the removal of cellular components from biological tissues, has gained prominence due to its potential to create scaffolds suitable for regenerative purposes [39]. This paradigm shift focuses on harnessing the distinctive attributes of plant tissues, an abundant and sustainable source, to form the basis for engineered structures. The title “Modification of Decellularized Plant Tissues” encapsulates the pursuit of innovative strategies to enhance and tailor these plant-derived scaffolds [40]. In tissue engineering, researchers investigate the complex process of modifying decellularized plant tissues to address specific challenges and optimize their applicability. The term “modification” encompasses a spectrum of interventions, ranging from surface alterations to structural enhancements, all aimed at tailoring plant-derived scaffolds to meet diverse tissue and organ requirements [41]. This interdisciplinary work combines expertise in biology, materials science, and engineering to overcome the complexities of plant tissue modification. Researchers have explored a myriad of possibilities, including the incorporation of bioactive molecules, structural adjustments, and surface modification to refine the properties of decellularized plant tissues [42]. The overarching goal is to create scaffolds that not only mimic the natural ECM but also exhibit enhanced functionalities for promoting cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation [28]. Furthermore, this modification process aims to address inherent limitations of plant-derived materials, such as mechanical strength and degradation kinetics, making them more compatible with the dynamic demands of tissue engineering [43].
Exploring the modification of decellularized plant tissues holds promise for advancing regenerative medicine, aligning with sustainability principles by offering an eco-friendly alternative to traditional scaffold materials [44]. This scientific journey, encapsulated by the title, highlights the modification of decellularized plant tissues as a transformative strategy, opening new avenues for creating advanced scaffolds with profound implications for the future of tissue engineering [45]. The comprehensive exploration of plant tissue modifications not only compensates for the absence of native ECM proteins but also underscores the adaptability and versatility of cellulose-based biomaterials in biomedical applications [46]. The integration of ECM-mimicking modifications extends the potential applications of decellularized plant tissues, rendering them more suitable for meeting the complex demands of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
Emerging Applications of Decellularized Plant-Based Scaffolds
The use of porous 3D scaffolds to provide a suitable environment for the generation of tissues and organs is vital for tissue engineering applications and for the exploration of novel cellular models for biomedical research [43]. For these purposes, several biomaterials have been explored, including ceramics, metals, bioactive glasses, animal-derived tissues, and polymers. Only recently, however, have plants and plant-based polymers emerged as relevant biomaterials [47].
Tissue Engineering
Vascularization of Decellularized Plant-Based Scaffolds
Gershlak
-
Fig. 3. Spinach Leaf Vascular Scaffolds in 3D Mammalian Cell Culture.
Spinach leaf vascular scaffolds demonstrate remarkable retention of patency and perfusion capabilities post-decellularization, enabling successful adhesion and function of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hPS-CMs) for 21 days. (A, B) Display the decellularized leaf before and after Ponceau Red perfusion, highlighting the preservation of the vascular architecture crucial for cellular perfusion and viability. (C, D) Fluorescence images depict leaf vasculature perfused with beads, illustrating the retention of 50 and 100 μm spheres within the vascular network. Scale bars indicate dimensions, crucial for assessing microvascular architecture: (C) 100 μm, (D) 500 μm. (E) hPS-CMs adhere to the leaf scaffold surface, forming distinct cell clusters critical for tissue organization and function. The scale bar denotes 50 μm, enabling precise assessment of cellular arrangements. (F) Contractile strain, indicative of cellular functionality, is visualized through a heatmap, providing insights into the dynamic behavior of hPSCMs within the scaffold environment. (G) Day 21 strain values reveal a diminished contractile strain magnitude, suggesting potential cellular maturation and adaptation within the scaffold over time. (H) Relative changes in fluorescent signals relative to the leaf surface are visualized, offering quantitative data on cellular distribution and viability throughout the scaffold. This comprehensive analysis demonstrates the efficacy of spinach leaf vascular scaffolds in supporting 3D mammalian cell culture, showcasing their potential in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. The ability to retain vascular patency and perfusion, coupled with successful hPS-CM adhesion and function, underscores the utility of plant-derived scaffolds as biocompatible substrates for advanced cell culture studies. (Reproduced, with permission, copyright 2017, Elsevier)
Mimicking Skeletal Tissue with Decellularized Plants
In their 2020 study, Campuzano
-
Fig. 4. Celery (
A. graveolens ) Scaffold Preparation and Cell Seeding. (A) This visual representation depicts the process of celery scaffold preparation, crucial for subsequent tissue engineering applications. (B) The samples obtained were 6mm wide with a thickness of 2.15 ± 0.15 mm. "XY" denotes scaffolds cut longitudinally (left) relative to the celery stalk, while "CS" corresponds to cross sections (right). After a 3-day incubation period in 0.1% SDS, the samples became clear, indicating successful decellularization. (C) Decellularized scaffolds served as substrates for cell seeding, with approximately 50,000 cells applied and left on the scaffold for 4.5 h. This crucial step initiates cell attachment and colonization onto the scaffold matrix. The presence of the vascular bundle (V.B.) within the scaffold underscores its anatomical relevance and potential for vascularized tissue engineering approaches. This method offers a promising platform for developing tissue-engineered constructs using natural plant-based scaffolds. The transparency achieved post-decellularization facilitates cell visualization and analysis, aiding in the evaluation of cell behavior and tissue formation. This comprehensive approach bridges the gap between plant biology and tissue engineering, offering novel strategies for scaffold fabrication and cell seeding techniques. Further exploration of celery-derived scaffolds holds significant promise for regenerative medicine applications and organ-ona- chip technologies. (Reproduced, with permission, copyright 2020, bioRxiv)
Bone Tissue Engineering with Decellularized Plant-Based Scaffolds
Lee
-
Fig. 5. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) cultivated in apple-derived scaffolds.
The diagram showcases a range of plant scaffolds, each characterized by distinct shapes and pore sizes. These attributes are critical for fostering the growth and development of iPSCs within the scaffolds. Understanding the morphology and porosity of these scaffolds is essential for optimizing cellular interactions, which is particularly important in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. By utilizing apple-derived scaffolds, researchers aim to leverage the unique properties of plant-based materials to support iPSC growth and differentiation in biomedical contexts. This visualization provides valuable insights into how scaffold architecture influences cell behavior and organization, offering potential avenues for enhancing the efficacy of iPSC-based therapies and tissue engineering strategies. (Reproduced, with permission, copyright 2019, Scientific Reports, Springer)
Latour
Regenerative Medicine
Regenerative decades have seen a growing interest within scholarly communities in the use of plant proteins as biodegradable and cytocompatible substances [56]. These proteins can be synthesized into fibers, hydrogels, micro- and nanoparticles, porous structures, and composites, exhibiting qualities suitable for tissue regeneration [43]. Notably, traditional tissue engineering materials often involve toxic solvents and non-environmentally friendly polymers, positioning regenerative medicine among the last fields to embrace green or eco-friendly procedures [57]. Plant protein scaffolds, like zein, soy protein, and wheat gluten, offer a sustainable alternative for regenerative medicine applications thanks to their mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and water stability [58]. The utilization of safe, eco-friendly materials and methods reduces the toxic and hazardous impacts of scientific research while minimizing energy consumption and waste production from various synthetic processes. One study demonstrated the production of a cross-linked porous scaffold based on a chitosan-soy protein blend system, employing the sol-gel method combined with freeze-drying [36]. The use of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) as a cross-linker enhanced the mechanical stability, degradation rate, and surface energy of the scaffolds. The silanol groups, associated with bone tissue engineering applications, may promote a mineral-type apatite surface under physiological conditions [52]. These scaffolds have also been investigated for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Another study developed porous membranes based on a cellulose-soy protein isolates (SPI) blend technique [22]. This approach involved blending SPI with hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), a water-soluble cellulose variant, to improve in vivo biodegradability of the composite scaffolds [59]. Epichlorohydrin (ECH) was utilized to cross-link SPI and HEC. The resulting films were biodegradable in vivo, with the rate of decomposition adjustable via the SPI concentration. Films containing over 30% SPI exhibited enhanced mechanical properties, water resistance, and appropriate biodegradability [60]. Gliadin and glutenin, two proteins from wheat gluten, were used to create membranes for potential tissue engineering scaffolds [61]. These films exhibited varied behaviors in water degradation and their ability to support fibroblast adhesion and proliferation. Submersion in water at pH 7.4 and 37°C for 15 days led to weight losses of 90% and 50% for wheat glutenin and gliadin, respectively [61]. Fibroblast cells found gliadin cytotoxic, whereas glutenin, devoid of gliadin and starch, was cytocompatible and significantly enhanced fibroblast cell adhesion and proliferation.
Particle leaching is a popular method for achieving regulated porosity in zein scaffolds [62]. In a study, a salt-leaching technique was employed to transform zein into a porous scaffold for potential bone applications. After 14 days of in vitro incubation, the zein scaffolds exhibited excellent porosity (75.3%–79.0%), strong pore interconnectivity, high mechanical properties, and a degradation rate of 89% with pepsin and 36% with collagenase [63]. The scaffolds facilitated the adhesion, growth, proliferation, and differentiation of hMSCs [64]. Another study used a solvent casting/particulate leaching approach to create a zein porous scaffold suitable for the growth of periodontal ligament cells (PDLCs), achieving appropriate porosity (64.1%–78.0%) and biocompatibility [43]. Additionally, a study utilized a similar method to construct porous scaffolds from zein/Polycaprolactone (PCL) composites for bone regeneration [62]. These biocomposite scaffolds displayed a well-connected network and a high porosity of around 70%. Compared to PCL scaffolds, zein/PCL scaffolds were more hydrophobic and degraded more rapidly after 28 days in PBS [65]. This research indicated that the degradation rate of the scaffolds could be tailored to match tissue regeneration rates by adjusting the zein concentration in the composite.
Cosmetics and Skin Care
Bioactive peptides (BP), specific protein fragments, play pivotal roles in the physiological functions of most living organisms. These BPs are involved in cellular signaling, developmental regulation, and defensive responses in plants. A study conducted on H2O2-stressed dermal human fibroblasts utilized an Avena sativa (oat) peptide-rich preparation derived from oat bran through enzymatic hydrolysis. The findings revealed that this preparation effectively reduced oxidative stress-induced cell damage by enhancing the activity of the enzyme Superoxide dismutase and inhibiting malondialdehyde (MDA) levels. Furthermore,
Future Perspectives
The promising outcomes of plant-based decellularization necessitate further research and development to fully harness its potential in regenerative medicine. Future studies should focus on refining decellularization techniques, thoroughly understanding the long-term effects of plant-based scaffolds, and scaling the methodology for clinical use. Comprehensive investigations into modifying decellularized plant tissues are essential to enhance their mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Creating a summary table of relevant publications detailing plant species, decellularization procedures, and key findings would be invaluable for researchers and practitioners in the field. Such a resource would consolidate knowledge, foster collaboration, and guide further exploration into diverse applications of plant-based decellularization. The advancement of plant decellularization should continue exploring various plant species and tissues to expand the range of potential scaffold materials. Active research in innovative scaffold fabrication techniques, including emerging applications in perfusable structures, is also crucial. Bridging the gap between biological sciences and engineering is key to establishing plant-based decellularization as a standard in tissue engineering. Ultimately, plant-based decellularization represents a revolutionary method with the potential to significantly impact regenerative medicine. By creating sustainable, cost-effective, and perfusable tissue engineering structures, this approach could revolutionize the field and contribute to next-generation therapeutics.
Conclusion
Plant-based decellularization represents a transformative and eco-friendly advancement in tissue engineering, offering innovative solutions for scaffold design and vascularization challenges. This article comprehensively examined the multifaceted aspects of plant-based decellularization, underscoring its potential to produce sustainable, cost-effective, and perfusable architectures for tissue engineering. The utilization of plant-derived materials, noted for their abundance and rapid growth, addresses critical concerns regarding sustainability and green chemistry, positioning this technology as a significant breakthrough in the field of regenerative medicine. The investigation covered essential components, including the methodologies for plant decellularization, challenges in scaffold production, various modification approaches, and case studies that demonstrate the practical applicability of this technology in tissue engineering. The article delved into both the advantages and challenges associated with plant-derived polymers, highlighting the significant potential of natural biopolymers to influence cell behavior and enhance biocompatibility. It discussed strategies such as post-spinning cross-linking and the blending of natural with synthetic polymers as methods to counteract inherent limitations, such as poor mechanical properties and rapid biodegradability. A unique and pivotal advantage of plant-based decellularization is its capacity to exploit the similarities between plant and animal vascular networks. By emulating the intricate, tapered, and branching network design akin to the human cardiovascular system, plant-based decellularization presents an innovative and groundbreaking strategy for creating perfusable scaffolds. This approach effectively addresses a critical limitation in contemporary bioengineering methods. The potential to develop scaffolds that support perfusion not only advances the field of tissue engineering but also paves the way for translating these solutions into clinical applications.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2019R1C1C1009606 and No. 2020R1A5A8018367)). This research was also supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF)& funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2022M3A9E4017151 & NRF-2022M3A9E4082654). This work was also supported by the Technology Innovation Program (or Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program (20015148) and the Alchemist Project (20012378) funded By the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea). This work was also supported by Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry(IPET) through the Agriculture and Food Convergence Technologies Program for Research Manpower development, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs(MAFRA)(project no. RS-2024-00397026).
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
References
- Zia KM, Tabasum S, Khan MF, Akram N, Akhter N, Noreen A,
et al . 2018. Recent trends on gellan gum blends with natural and synthetic polymers: a review.Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 109 : 1068-1087. - Benning L, Gutzweiler L, Tröndle K, Riba J, Zengerle R, Koltay P,
et al . 2018. Assessment of hydrogels for bioprinting of endothelial cells.J. Biomed. Mater. Res. - Part A 106 : 935-947. - Toprakhisar B, Nadernezhad A, Bakirci E, Khani N, Skvortsov GA, Koc B. 2018. Development of bioink from decellularized tendon extracellular matrix for 3D bioprinting.
Macromol. Biosci. 18 : e1800024. - Choi YJ, Cho DW, Lee H. 2022. Development of silk fibroin scaffolds by using indirect 3D-bioprinting technology.
Micromachines 13 : 43. - Maji S, Lee H. 2022. Engineering hydrogels for the development of three-dimensional in vitro models.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 : 2662. - Dai Y, Qiao K, Li D, Isingizwe P, Liu H, Liu Y,
et al . 2023. Plant-derived biomaterials and their potential in cardiac tissue repair.Adv. Healthc. Mater. 12 : e2202827. - Fontana G, Gershlak J, Adamski M, Lee JS, Matsumoto S, Le HD,
et al . 2017. Biofunctionalized plants as diverse biomaterials for human cell culture.Adv. Healthc. Mater. 6 : 10.1002/adhm.201601225. - Osi AR, Zhang H, Chen J, Zhou Y, Wang R, Fu J,
et al . 2021. Three-dimensional-printable thermo/photo-cross-linked methacrylated chitosan-gelatin hydrogel composites for tissue engineering.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 : 22902-22913. - Keane TJ, Swinehart IT, Badylak SF. 2015. Methods of tissue decellularization used for preparation of biologic scaffolds and in vivo relevance.
Methods 84 : 25-34. - Iravani S, Varma RS. 2019. Plants and plant-based polymers as scaffolds for tissue engineering.
Green Chem. 21 : 4839-4867. - Chae S, Ha DH, Lee H. 2023. 3D bioprinting strategy for engineering vascularized tissue models.
Int. J. Bioprinting 9 : 748. - Panwar A, Tan LP. 2016. Current status of bioinks for micro-extrusion-based 3D bioprinting.
Molecules 21 : 685. - Chen L, Liu J rong, Hu W fang, Gao J, Yang J yan. 2021. Vanadium in soil-plant system: source, fate, toxicity, and bioremediation.
J. Hazard. Mater. 405 : 124200. - Yenilmez B, Temirel M, Knowlton S, Lepowsky E, Tasoglu S. 2019. Development and characterization of a low-cost 3D bioprinter.
Bioprinting 13 : e00044. - Xing H, Lee H, Luo L, Kyriakides TR. 2020. Extracellular matrix-derived biomaterials in engineering cell function.
Biotechnol. Adv. 42 : 107421. - Hospodiuk M, Dey M, Sosnoski D, Ozbolat IT. 2017. The bioink: a comprehensive review on bioprintable materials.
Biotechnol. Adv. 35 : 217-239. - Lee H, Han W, Kim H, Ha DH, Jang J, Kim BS,
et al . 2017. Development of liver decellularized extracellular matrix bioink for threedimensional cell printing-based liver tissue engineering.Biomacromolecules 18 : 1229-1237. - Taylor DJ, Feher J, Halliday I, Hose DR, Gosling R, Aubiniere-R L,
et al . 2022. Refining our understanding of the flow through coronary artery branches; Revisiting Murray's law in human epicardial coronary arteries.Front. Mater. 13 : 871912. - Mironov V, Boland T, Trusk T, Forgacs G, Markwald RR. 2003. Organ printing: computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering.
Trends Biotechnol. 21 : 157-161. - Cidonio G, Cooke M, Glinka M, Dawson JI, Grover L, Oreffo ROC. 2019. Printing bone in a gel: using nanocomposite bioink to print functionalised bone scaffolds.
Mater. Today Bio 4 : 100028. - Gershlak JR, Hernandez S, Fontana G, Perreault LR, Hansen KJ, Larson SA,
et al . 2017. Crossing kingdoms: using decellularized plants as perfusable tissue engineering scaffolds.Biomaterials 125 : 13-22. - Qiu Y, McClements DJ, Chen J, Li C, Liu C, Dai T. 2023. Construction of 3D printed meat analogs from plant-based proteins: improving the printing performance of soy protein- and gluten-based pastes facilitated by rice protein.
Food Res. Int. 167 : 112635. - Bilirgen AC, Toker M, Odabas S, Yetisen AK, Garipcan B, Tasoglu S. 2021. Plant-based scaffolds in tissue engineering.
ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 7 : 926-938. - Zhu Y, Zhang Q, Wang S, Zhang J, Fan S, Lin X. 2021. Current advances in the development of decellularized plant extracellular matrix.
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9 : 712262. - Harris AF, Lacombe J, Zenhausern F. 2021. The emerging role of decellularized plant-based scaffolds as a new biomaterial.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 : 12347. - Harris AF, Lacombe J, Liyanage S, Han MY, Wallace E, Karsunky S,
et al . 2021. Supercritical carbon dioxide decellularization of plant material to generate 3D biocompatible scaffolds.Sci. Rep. 11 : 3643. - Ning L, Guillemot A, Zhao J, Kipouros G, Chen X. 2016. Influence of flow behavior of alginate-cell suspensions on cell viability and proliferation.
Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 22 : 652-662. - Fomby P, Cherlin AJ, Hadjizadeh A, Doillon CJ, Sueblinvong V,
et al . 2010. Stem cells and cell therapies in lung biology and diseases: conference report.Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 12 : 181-204. - Robbins ER, Pins GD, Laflamme MA, Gaudette GR. 2020. Creation of a contractile biomaterial from a decellularized spinach leaf without ECM protein coating: an in vitro study.
J. Biomed. Mater. Res. - Part A 108 : 2123-2132. - Wang Z, Lee SJ, Cheng HJ, Yoo JJ, Atala A. 2018. 3D bioprinted functional and contractile cardiac tissue constructs.
Acta Biomater. 70 : 48-56. - Ghosh S, Yi HG. 2022. A review on bioinks and their application in plant bioprinting.
Int. J. Bioprinting 8 : 172-204. - Hay ID, Rehman ZU, Moradali MF, Wang Y, Rehm BHA. 2013. Microbial alginate production, modification and its applications.
Microb. Biotechnol. 6 : 637-650. - Nasatto PL, Pignon F, Silveira JLM, Duarte MER, Noseda MD,
et al . 2015. Methylcellulose, a cellulose derivative with original physical properties and extended applications.Polymers (Basel). 7 : 777-803. - Yang X, Lu Z, Wu H, Li W, Zheng L, Zhao J. 2018. Collagen-alginate as bioink for three-dimensional (3D) cell printing based cartilage tissue engineering.
Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 83 : 195-201. - Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS. 2010. Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts.
Mater. Des. 31 : 287-295. - Silva SS, Oliveira JM, Mano JF, Reis RL. 2006. Physicochemical characterization of novel chitosan-soy protein/TEOS porous hybrids for tissue engineering applications.
Mater. Sci. Forum 514-516 : 1000-1004. - Yin J, Yan M, Wang Y, Fu J, Suo H. 2018. 3D Bioprinting of low-concentration cell-laden Gelatin Methacrylate (GelMA) bioinks with a two-step cross-linking strategy.
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 : 6849-6857. - Parodi I, Di Lisa D, Pastorino L, Scaglione S, Fato MM. 2023. 3D Bioprinting as a powerful technique for recreating the tumor microenvironment.
Gels 9 : 482. - Latour ML, Tarar M, Hickey RJ, Cuerrier CM, Catelas I,
et al . 2020. Plant-derived Cellulose Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.bioRxiv : 2020.01.15.906677. - Gao G, Lee JH, Jang J, Lee DH, Kong JS,
et al . 2017. Tissue engineered bio-blood-vessels constructed using a tissue-specific bioink and 3D coaxial cell printing technique: a novel therapy for ischemic disease.Adv. Funct. Mater. 27 . doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201700798. - Serra T, Mateos-Timoneda MA, Planell JA, Navarro M. 2013. 3D printed PLA-based scaffolds: a versatile tool in regenerative medicine.
Organogenesis 9 : 239-244. - Goulson D. 2013. An overview of the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoid insecticides.
J. Appl. Ecol. 50 : 977-987. - Xu W, Zhang X, Yang P, Långvik O, Wang X, Zhang Y,
et al . 2019. Surface engineered biomimetic inks based on UV cross-linkable wood biopolymers for 3D printing.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 : 12389-12400. - Yan-Zhi X, Jing-Jing W, Chen YP, Liu J, Li N, Yang F-Y. 2010. The use of zein and Shuanghuangbu for periodontal tissue engineering.
Int. J. Oral Sci. 2 : 142-148. - Boularaoui S, Al Hussein G, Khan KA, Christoforou N, Stefanini C. 2020. An overview of extrusion-based bioprinting with a focus on induced shear stress and its effect on cell viability.
Bioprinting 20 : e00093. - Moura D, Pereira RF, Gonçalves IC. 2022. Recent advances on bioprinting of hydrogels containing carbon materials.
Mater. Today Chem. 23 : 100617. - Munarin F, Tanzi MC, Petrini P. 2012. Advances in biomedical applications of pectin gels.
Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 51 : 681-689. - Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D, Ramani K, Chen Y,
et al . 2015. The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering.CAD Comput. Aided Des. 69 : 65-89. - Jansen K, Evangelopoulou M, Pou Casellas C, Abrishamcar S, Jansen J, Vermonden T,
et al . 2021. Spinach and chive for kidney tubule engineering: the limitations of decellularized plant scaffolds and vasculature.AAPS J. 23 : 11. - Turner PR, Murray E, McAdam CJ, McConnell MA, Cabral JD. 2020. Peptide chitosan/dextran core/shell vascularized 3D constructs for wound healing.
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 : 32328-32339. - Benton G, Arnaoutova I, George J, Kleinman HK, Koblinski J. 2014. Matrigel: from discovery and ECM mimicry to assays and models for cancer research.
Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 79 : 3-18. - Rodrigues MT, Leonor IB, Gröen N, Viegas CA, Dias IR, Caridade SG,
et al . 2014. Bone marrow stromal cells on a three-dimensional bioactive fiber mesh undergo osteogenic differentiation in the absence of osteogenic media supplements: the effect of silanol groups.Acta Biomater. 10 : 4175-4185. - Capozzi F, Carotenuto R, Giordano S, Spagnuolo V. 2018. Evidence on the effectiveness of mosses for biomonitoring of microplastics in fresh water environment.
Chemosphere 205 : 1-7. - Lee J, Jung H, Park N, Park SH, Ju JH. 2019. Induced osteogenesis in plants decellularized scaffolds.
Sci. Rep. 9 : 20194. - Modulevsky DJ, Cuerrier CM, Pelling AE. 2016. Biocompatibility of subcutaneously implanted plant-derived cellulose biomaterials.
PLoS One 11 : e0157894. - Sharma R, Smits IPM, De La Vega L, Lee C, Willerth SM. 2020. 3D Bioprinting pluripotent stem cell derived neural tissues using a novel fibrin bioink containing drug releasing microspheres.
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8 : 57. - Lee HY, Lee JW. 2023. Current status and future outlook of additive manufacturing technologies for the reconstruction of the trachea.
J. Funct. Biomater. 14 : 196. - Chiang JH, Loveday SM, Hardacre AK, Parker ME. 2019. Effects of soy protein to wheat gluten ratio on the physicochemical properties of extruded meat analogues.
Food Struct. 19 : 100102. - Markstedt K, Mantas A, Tournier I, Martínez Ávila H, Hägg D, Gatenholm P. 2015. 3D bioprinting human chondrocytes with nanocellulose-alginate bioink for cartilage tissue engineering applications.
Biomacromolecules 16 : 1489-1496. - Jansen K, Evangelopoulou M, Pou Casellas C, Abrishamcar S, Jansen J, Vermonden T,
et al . 2021. Spinach and chive for kidney tubule engineering: the limitations of decellularized plant scaffolds and vasculature.AAPS J. 23 : 11. - Reddy N, Yang Y. 2011. Potential of plant proteins for medical applications.
Trends Biotechnol. 29 : 490-498. - Wu F, Wei J, Liu C, O'Neill B, Ngothai Y. 2012. Fabrication and properties of porous scaffold of zein/PCL biocomposite for bone tissue engineering.
Compos. Part B Eng. 43 : 2192-2197. - Kim BS, Kwon Y W, Kong JS, Park GT, Gao G, Han W,
et al . 2018. 3D cell printing of in vitro stabilized skin model and in vivo prevascularized skin patch using tissue-specific extracellular matrix bioink: a step towards advanced skin tissue engineering.Biomaterials 168 : 38-53. - Kolesky DB, Homan KA, Skylar-Scott MA, Lewis JA. 2016. Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113 : 3179-3184. - Janarthanan G, Tran HN, Cha E, Lee C, Das D, Noh I. 2020. 3D printable and injectable lactoferrin-loaded carboxymethyl celluloseglycol chitosan hydrogels for tissue engineering applications.
Mater. Sci. Eng. C Biol. Appl. 113 : 111008. - Burnett C, Bergfeld WF, Belsito DV, Hill RA, Klaassen CD, Liebler DC,
et al . 2018. Safety assessment of hydrolyzed wheat protein and hydrolyzed wheat gluten as used in cosmetics.Int. J. Toxicol. 37 : 55S-66S. - Brückner-Gühmann M, Kratzsch A, Sozer N, Drusch S. 2021. Oat protein as plant-derived gelling agent: Properties and potential of modification.
Future Foods 4 : 100053.
Related articles in JMB
Article
Review
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024; 34(5): 1003-1016
Published online May 28, 2024 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2401.01024
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Plant-Based Decellularization: A Novel Approach for Perfusion-Compatible Tissue Engineering Structures
Md Mehedee Hasan1, Ashikur Rahman Swapon1,2, Tazrin Islam Dipti1,2, Yeong-Jin Choi3*, and Hee-Gyeong Yi1,2*
1Department of Convergence Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (CALS), Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea
2Interdisciplinary Program in IT-Bio Convergence System, Chonnam National University, Republic of Korea
3Department of Advanced Biomaterials Research, Korea Institute of Materials Science (KIMS), Changwon 51508, Republic of Korea
Correspondence to:Hee-Gyeong Yi , hgyi@jnu.ac.kr
Abstract
This study explores the potential of plant-based decellularization in regenerative medicine, a pivotal development in tissue engineering focusing on scaffold development, modification, and vascularization. Plant decellularization involves removing cellular components from plant structures, offering an eco-friendly and cost-effective alternative to traditional scaffold materials. The use of plant-derived polymers is critical, presenting both benefits and challenges, notably in mechanical properties. Integration of plant vascular networks represents a significant bioengineering breakthrough, aligning with natural design principles. The paper provides an in-depth analysis of development protocols, scaffold fabrication considerations, and illustrative case studies showcasing plant-based decellularization applications. This technique is transformative, offering sustainable scaffold design solutions with readily available plant materials capable of forming perfusable structures. Ongoing research aims to refine protocols, assess long-term implications, and adapt the process for clinical use, indicating a path toward widespread adoption. Plant-based decellularization holds promise for regenerative medicine, bridging biological sciences with engineering through eco-friendly approaches. Future perspectives include protocol optimization, understanding long-term impacts, clinical scalability, addressing mechanical limitations, fostering collaboration, exploring new research areas, and enhancing education. Collectively, these efforts envision a regenerative future where nature and scientific innovation converge to create sustainable solutions, offering hope for generations to come.
Keywords: Green tissue engineering, plant scaffolds, vascularized structures, regenerative innovation, sustainable bioengineering
Introduction
Tissue engineering has emerged as a groundbreaking field that seamlessly integrates materials science, mechanical engineering, clinical medicine, and genetics to revolutionize regenerative medicine [1]. Central to this transformative domain is the intricate interplay of porous three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds meticulously designed to create an optimal environment for tissue and organ regeneration [2]. The selection of scaffold materials has become a critical factor that requires consideration of biocompatibility, biodegradability and mechanical properties. To push the boundaries of conventional tissue engineering, researchers are increasingly exploring innovative solutions. One of these promising avenues involves the incorporation of natural biopolymers [3]. This article explores the burgeoning field of plant-based decellularization, an innovative approach poised to redefine the landscape of scaffold design and tissue engineering [4]. Tissue engineering, at its core, relies on a complex synergy of different scientific disciplines, ranging from materials science to genetics [4]. The aim of this field is to exploit the regenerative potential of living cells to repair or regenerate damaged tissues and organs caused by diseases or trauma. The utilization of 3D scaffolds plays a pivotal role in providing a supportive microenvironment for cellular growth and tissue formation, which is central to tissue engineering [5, 6].
Various of scaffolds made from different materials using different production methods have been used to rebuild a spectrum of tissues and organs within the human body [7]. Critical considerations in scaffold design include biocompatibility, biodegradability, mechanical properties, scaffold architecture, and manufacturing technologies [8]. The ideal scaffold should mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM) of native tissues and provide insights to guide cell behavior and tissue regeneration [9]. Incorporation of natural biopolymers derived from both animal and plant sources has gained prominence due to their potential influence on cell behavior and biocompatibility. However, problems such as poor mechanical properties and rapid biodegradability have prompted researchers to refine these biomaterials. Among the myriad natural sources, plant-based polymers have attracted attention due to their sustainability, abundance, and cost-effectiveness [10]. Plants and plant-derived materials offer a unique opportunity to revolutionize tissue engineering. This article focuses on an innovative approach to plant-based decellularization, a process involving the removal of cellular components from plant structure, leaving behind acellular scaffolds. The advantages of this approach are numerous, starting with the abundance and rapid growth of a large number of plant species, providing a cost-effective and sustainable source of scaffold materials [3].
In addition, while the low cost and abundant sources of plant-based materials are highlighted, it's essential to underscore their unique chemical and structural properties that can offer tailored interactions with cells, potentially enhancing scaffold functionality and biocompatibility. Additionally, the renewable nature of plant resources aligns with sustainable practices, making plant-based decellularization an environmentally conscious choice in tissue engineering advancements (Fig. 1).
-
Figure 1. Illustrative depiction of the transformative potential of plant-based decellularization in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering.
This schematic encapsulates the intricate process of scaffold development, modification, and vascularization, highlighting the eco-friendly and cost-effective nature of plant-derived materials.
Natural biopolymers derived from plants, including proteins, carbohydrates, lignin, and extracts, offer a variety of [11] scaffold assembly options [12]. Their biocompatibility, coupled with their ability to shape cell behavior through chemical signals, make them promising candidates for tissue engineering applications [13]. However, their inherent limitations, such as poor mechanical properties and rapid biodegradability, have spurred researchers to explore innovative strategies. Post-spinning cross-linking, a procedure addressing the mechanical limitations by enhancing the structural integrity of natural biopolymers, is a notable approach [14]. In addition, blending natural polymers with synthetic counterparts has shown promise in overcoming these challenges, potentially yielding ideal scaffolds for tissue engineering applications [15]. Synthesizing natural and synthetic elements is crucial for the development of scaffolds that balance biocompatibility, mechanical strength and durability. Traditionally, animal-derived tissues have been the primary source of decellularized scaffolds, but they are limited in terms of cost, availability, and ethics [16]. Plant-based decellularization has emerged as a sustainable and scalable alternative. Furthermore, recent advancements in the development of 3D in vitro biomimetic tissue models using hydrogel-based biomaterials have garnered significant attention in tissue engineering research. Hydrogels, known for their biomimetic properties mirroring the native tissue microenvironment, offer a promising platform for creating intricate tissue structures in vitro . However, challenges persist in achieving optimal mechanical strength solely through natural polymers for scaffold fabrication. Novel scaffold fabrication methods, such as indirect 3D-bioprinting technology utilizing natural polymers like silk fibroin, have emerged to address these limitations. These approaches enable the creation of biocompatible scaffolds with tunable mechanical properties, offering versatility for various tissue engineering applications. As example, the use of plant scaffolds offers significant advantages over existing biomaterials, particularly in addressing vascularization efforts and associated difficulties. Leveraging existing plant vascular systems as blood vessels simplifies the process of vascularization in tissue engineering [11]. This approach streamlines the establishment of functional vasculature in engineered tissues, reducing complexities and enhancing overall feasibility. Thus, incorporating plant scaffolds into tissue engineering strategies represents a promising avenue for overcoming challenges related to vascularization. Decellularization involves the removal of cellular components from a tissue or organ, leaving behind an acellular scaffold composed of ECM [17]. The unique advantage of plant-based decellularization lies in the inherent similarities between plant and animal vascular network structures. According to Murray’s law, plants have a tapered, branching network reminiscent of the human cardiovascular system. Leveraging these similarities offers a novel strategy for creating perfusable scaffolds for tissue engineering [18].
Plant-based decellularization involves the application of decellularization techniques to various plant species and tissues, resulting in the generation of acellular, pre-vascularized tissue engineering scaffolds [19]. In addition to cost-effectiveness and sustainability, creating perfusable structures addresses a critical limitation in current bio-engineering approaches, i.e. the lack of functional vascular networks [20]. Current bioengineering techniques face challenges in the creation of patent perfusion vessels, limiting the size of grafts that can be engineered while maintaining viability. Plant-based decellularization represents a paradigm shift in the use of the intricate vascular networks of plants to create scaffolds that support perfusion [21]. This innovation has a significant promise for the development of tissue engineering solutions in clinical practice. Recognizing the broader implications of this approach is essential for understanding the intricacies of plant-based decellularization [22]. The advantages extend beyond the limitations of current bioengineering techniques. The abundance and rapid growth of plant species is a readily available and cost-effective source of scaffold materials in line with the principles of sustainability and green chemistry [10]. Moreover, while much attention has been given to using the plant itself as a scaffold after decellularization, exploring the properties of plant-based hydrogels and their cross-linking methods could offer valuable insights for future applications. Plant-based hydrogels, with their unique structural characteristics and biocompatibility, hold significant promise in tissue engineering. Understanding the cross-linking mechanisms and manipulation techniques of these hydrogels is crucial for optimizing their mechanical properties and biodegradability in scaffold design. In subsequent sections, we will delve into the properties and potential applications of plant-based hydrogels, shedding light on their role in advancing tissue engineering methodologies.
The field of tissue engineering is at the precipice of a transformative breakthrough in plant-based decellularization [23]. Utilization of plant-derived materials, coupled with innovative decellularization techniques, opens new frontiers in scaffold design [24]. The possibility of creating perfusable structures and overcoming the challenges of vascularization holds promise for advancing tissue engineering solutions. In the following sections, we unravel the intricacies of plant-based decellularization and provide a comprehensive understanding of its potential, challenges and implications for the future of regenerative medicine. The specific objective of this study is to comprehensively explore the potential of plant-based decellularization as a revolutionary approach for generating perfusable tissue engineering structures. In the following sections, we unravel the diverse roles of plant-based polymers, assess the advantages and challenges associated with plant-derived scaffold materials, and discuss the implications of this innovative technique in overcoming current tissue engineering limitations. Additionally, it's imperative to compare and explain the pros and cons of plant-based and existing polymer-based biomaterials in terms of materials. While plant-based materials offer sustainability, unique chemical properties, and potential cost-effectiveness, existing polymer-based biomaterials may offer superior mechanical properties and a longer degradation profile. Understanding these differences is crucial in selecting the most suitable materials for specific tissue engineering applications. Therefore, in subsequent sections, we will delve into a comparative analysis of plant-based and polymer-based biomaterials to provide a comprehensive understanding of their respective advantages and limitations in scaffold design and tissue engineering. Moreover, exploring the effect of certain plants on regenerating specific tissues could provide valuable insights into tissue engineering. Plants possess a rich array of bioactive compounds that may influence tissue regeneration in unique ways. Future research could investigate the specific effects of plant-derived compounds on tissue regeneration and tailor scaffold designs accordingly to enhance tissue-specific regeneration outcomes. So that, future research will explore the potential of plant-based materials in influencing tissue-specific regeneration processes and discuss avenues for further research in this area.
Development of Plant Decellularization
Plant decellularization has emerged as a transformative and sustainable approach in the dynamic landscape of tissue engineering, promising to redefine conventional scaffold design [25]. This novel technique involves the meticulous removal of cellular components from plant structures, yielding acellular scaffolds rich in ECM composition [9]. Plant-based decellularization is inspired by the traditional methods applied to animal tissues and exploits the distinctive advantages of plants. Scientists have increasingly focused on plant-derived polymers, looking for abundant, sustainable, and cost-effective scaffold materials that include proteins, carbohydrates, lignin, and extracts. However, challenges, such as poor mechanical properties and rapid biodegradability, have led to the investigation of innovative strategies, such as post-spinning cross-linking and blending natural polymers with synthetic polymers. At the core of the transformative potential of plant-based decellularization is its ability to generate acellular, pre-vascularized tissue engineering scaffolds, addressing limitations associated with traditional animal-derived tissues, including cost, availability, and ethical considerations [26]. The inherent similarities between plant and animal vascular network structures provide a unique avenue for creating perfusable scaffolds, crucial for establishing functional vascular networks in tissue engineering [7]. This burgeoning field extends beyond the resolution of the challenges posed by current bioengineering techniques since the abundant and rapid growth of various plant species makes them readily available and cost-effective sources of scaffold materials, which is consistent with sustainability principles [27].
As researchers explore the intricacies of plant-based decellularization, the potential to create perfusable tissue engineering structures is becoming more and more evident, leading to transformative applications in regenerative medicine. Recent studies exploring a spectrum of plant species and tissues and applying decellularization techniques to generate acellular scaffolds highlight the potential of this method in overcoming the challenges associated with current bioengineering approaches [28]. This innovative technique has significant promise for advancing tissue engineering solutions in clinical applications and addressing the growing demand for effective regenerative treatments [9].
Holistic exploration of plant-based decellularization is complemented by numerous studies that provide insights into the potential of plant-based polymers for tissue-engineering applications, comprehensive analysis, and understanding [21]. These references highlight the depth and breadth of plant-based decellularization research. The development of plant decellularization is a testament to the ongoing evolution of tissue engineering, with researchers embracing the unique attributes of plant-derived materials and innovative decellularization techniques to open new frontiers in scaffold design [29]. The potential to create perfusable structures, together with addressing the challenges of vascularization, holds great promise for the development of novel tissue engineering solutions. As we explore the intricate details of plant-based decellularization, we gain a deeper understanding of its potential, challenges, and transformative implications for the future of regenerative medicine.
Modulevsky
-
Figure 2. Apple-derived cellulose scaffold generation for 3D mammalian cell culture.
McIntosh red apples were subjected to a controlled drying process at 220°C for up to 5 min to rigidify the outer hypanthium tissue. Following this, the apples underwent precise slicing using a mandolin slicer, ensuring thin and uniform sections while removing the cores. Subsequently, uniform segments measuring 2.0 × 0.5 cm were excised from the sliced apples and individually placed in microcentrifuge tubes for further processing. Decellularization of these apple segments ensued, involving the removal of cellular components while preserving the structural integrity of the cellulose matrix. Post-decellularization, the segments underwent surface modification with various chemistries. These modifications included coating with Type 1 collagen, chemical cross-linking using glutaraldehyde, or incubation in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).The treated segments, now transformed into scaffolds, were introduced into mammalian cell culture medium (DMEM) and incubated for 12 h under standard tissue culture conditions (37°C, 5% CO2). This incubation period allowed for equilibration and preparation of the scaffolds for subsequent cell seeding. For cell seeding, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-coated 24-well plates were utilized, with each well containing 40 ml of cell suspension. The seeded scaffolds were incubated for 6 h to facilitate cell attachment and initial colonization. Subsequently, the wells were filled with DMEM and maintained for up to 12 weeks, providing an extended culture period to assess cell growth, viability, and functionality within the scaffolds. (Reproduced, with permission, copyright 2014, PLOS).
Crucial Aspects of Scaffold Fabrication
Fabrication of scaffolds is pivotal in tissue engineering and influences the success of regenerative medicine applications. This article provides an in-depth exploration of the essential aspects of scaffold fabrication, illuminating key factors that influence their design, functionality, and overall effectiveness in tissue engineering.
(a) Material Selection
The choice of material for scaffold fabrication is paramount and must be aligned with the specific tissue or organ application [30]. Critical factors such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, and mechanical properties significantly influence this selection process.
(b) Structural Design
Structural design, including aspects such as pore size, interconnectivity, and overall architecture, substantially influences cell behavior and tissue regeneration. Emerging research, including the work, explores advanced structural designs that mimic the native ECM, fostering improved cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation [31].
(c) Manufacturing Techniques
Various manufacturing techniques, such as electrospinning, 3D printing and freeze-drying, are employed in scaffold fabrication. Comparative analyses of these techniques offer insights into their respective strengths and limitations, aiding researchers in selecting the most suitable method for their specific needs [32].
(d) Surface Modification
Surface modification of scaffolds can enhance bioactivity and cell–scaffold interactions [33]. Strategies such as biomolecule coating or bioactive nanoparticle incorporation are explored, highlighting the importance of surface modification in scaffold tailoring for specific tissue environments.
(e) Biological Functionalization
Incorporating biological cues into scaffolds is crucial for tissue regeneration. The role of biological functionalization in scaffold fabrication, emphasizes the integration of growth factors, peptides, and other signaling molecules [34].
(f) Quality Control and Standardization
Ensuring the reproducibility and consistency of scaffold fabrication is crucial for clinical translation. The importance of quality control measures and standardization protocols for scaffold fabrication, addressing challenges, and proposing guidelines for maintaining manufacturing reproducibility is critical [35].
In addition, the production of scaffolds for tissue engineering presents a number of challenges and considerations that must be carefully addressed to achieve successful outcomes. These challenges summarized below emphasize the intricacies of scaffold preparation and their impact on various aspects of tissue engineering.
(i) Scaffolding Methods, Tissue Types, and Applications
Scaffold preparation raises critical issues related to pore size, focusing on specific cell types and engineered tissues. The choice of scaffolding methods is closely linked to the intended tissue application and requires scalability for clinical and commercial use. The development of scalable manufacturing processes in accordance with good manufacturing practice (GMP) standards is crucial for the clinical application of tissue engineering approaches [15]. These considerations extend to product delivery, storage and off-the-shelf availability, taking into account clinicians’ preferences for ease of use.
(ii) Biodegradability and Biocompatibility
Biodegradability and biocompatibility are essential properties for cell adhesion and propagation. Cytocompatibility testing, in vivo formulation evaluation and analyses of bioactivity and biocompatibility are essential. Scaffolds should induce a minimal immune response after grafting in order to avoid an inflammatory response that may hinder healing [36]. The choice of materials, including plant-based sources, has been explored for their favorable properties, such as high biocompatibility and bioactivity, making them suitable for tissue engineering.
(iii) Mechanical Property
Scaffold mechanical properties must align with the anatomical site of implantation, necessitating strength for surgical handling during grafting [23]. Tailoring mechanical integrity is a significant challenge, particularly in cardiovascular and orthopedic applications where long-term mechanical support is crucial. To ensure both cellular infiltration and vascularization, achieving a balance between mechanical characteristics and porous architecture is critical [37].
(iv) Architecture
The structural architecture of scaffolds requires an interconnected pore structure and high porosity [27]. This facilitates cellular penetration, nutrient dispersal, and waste product diffusion. The size of the pores must strike a delicate balance to allow cell migration while maintaining specificity for appropriate ligand binding [38]. A porous interconnected structure is necessary for the elimination of waste products without hindering the surrounding tissues.
(v) Clinical Status Evaluation
Clinical evaluation is essential to validate scaffold efficacy [10]. Micro-computed tomography imaging and histological analyses are performed to assess organ defect repair. Challenges include limited sample sizes, lack of randomized control groups, and long-term study limitations [21]. Overcoming these limitations is necessary to detect rare adverse events and assess the long-term benefits of interventions.
Modification of Decellularized Plant Tissues
Modification of decellularized plant tissues is at the forefront of advances in tissue engineering, reflecting a transformative strategy in dynamic regenerative medicine. Decellularization, the removal of cellular components from biological tissues, has gained prominence due to its potential to create scaffolds suitable for regenerative purposes [39]. This paradigm shift focuses on harnessing the distinctive attributes of plant tissues, an abundant and sustainable source, to form the basis for engineered structures. The title “Modification of Decellularized Plant Tissues” encapsulates the pursuit of innovative strategies to enhance and tailor these plant-derived scaffolds [40]. In tissue engineering, researchers investigate the complex process of modifying decellularized plant tissues to address specific challenges and optimize their applicability. The term “modification” encompasses a spectrum of interventions, ranging from surface alterations to structural enhancements, all aimed at tailoring plant-derived scaffolds to meet diverse tissue and organ requirements [41]. This interdisciplinary work combines expertise in biology, materials science, and engineering to overcome the complexities of plant tissue modification. Researchers have explored a myriad of possibilities, including the incorporation of bioactive molecules, structural adjustments, and surface modification to refine the properties of decellularized plant tissues [42]. The overarching goal is to create scaffolds that not only mimic the natural ECM but also exhibit enhanced functionalities for promoting cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation [28]. Furthermore, this modification process aims to address inherent limitations of plant-derived materials, such as mechanical strength and degradation kinetics, making them more compatible with the dynamic demands of tissue engineering [43].
Exploring the modification of decellularized plant tissues holds promise for advancing regenerative medicine, aligning with sustainability principles by offering an eco-friendly alternative to traditional scaffold materials [44]. This scientific journey, encapsulated by the title, highlights the modification of decellularized plant tissues as a transformative strategy, opening new avenues for creating advanced scaffolds with profound implications for the future of tissue engineering [45]. The comprehensive exploration of plant tissue modifications not only compensates for the absence of native ECM proteins but also underscores the adaptability and versatility of cellulose-based biomaterials in biomedical applications [46]. The integration of ECM-mimicking modifications extends the potential applications of decellularized plant tissues, rendering them more suitable for meeting the complex demands of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
Emerging Applications of Decellularized Plant-Based Scaffolds
The use of porous 3D scaffolds to provide a suitable environment for the generation of tissues and organs is vital for tissue engineering applications and for the exploration of novel cellular models for biomedical research [43]. For these purposes, several biomaterials have been explored, including ceramics, metals, bioactive glasses, animal-derived tissues, and polymers. Only recently, however, have plants and plant-based polymers emerged as relevant biomaterials [47].
Tissue Engineering
Vascularization of Decellularized Plant-Based Scaffolds
Gershlak
-
Figure 3. Spinach Leaf Vascular Scaffolds in 3D Mammalian Cell Culture.
Spinach leaf vascular scaffolds demonstrate remarkable retention of patency and perfusion capabilities post-decellularization, enabling successful adhesion and function of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hPS-CMs) for 21 days. (A, B) Display the decellularized leaf before and after Ponceau Red perfusion, highlighting the preservation of the vascular architecture crucial for cellular perfusion and viability. (C, D) Fluorescence images depict leaf vasculature perfused with beads, illustrating the retention of 50 and 100 μm spheres within the vascular network. Scale bars indicate dimensions, crucial for assessing microvascular architecture: (C) 100 μm, (D) 500 μm. (E) hPS-CMs adhere to the leaf scaffold surface, forming distinct cell clusters critical for tissue organization and function. The scale bar denotes 50 μm, enabling precise assessment of cellular arrangements. (F) Contractile strain, indicative of cellular functionality, is visualized through a heatmap, providing insights into the dynamic behavior of hPSCMs within the scaffold environment. (G) Day 21 strain values reveal a diminished contractile strain magnitude, suggesting potential cellular maturation and adaptation within the scaffold over time. (H) Relative changes in fluorescent signals relative to the leaf surface are visualized, offering quantitative data on cellular distribution and viability throughout the scaffold. This comprehensive analysis demonstrates the efficacy of spinach leaf vascular scaffolds in supporting 3D mammalian cell culture, showcasing their potential in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. The ability to retain vascular patency and perfusion, coupled with successful hPS-CM adhesion and function, underscores the utility of plant-derived scaffolds as biocompatible substrates for advanced cell culture studies. (Reproduced, with permission, copyright 2017, Elsevier)
Mimicking Skeletal Tissue with Decellularized Plants
In their 2020 study, Campuzano
-
Figure 4. Celery (
A. graveolens ) Scaffold Preparation and Cell Seeding. (A) This visual representation depicts the process of celery scaffold preparation, crucial for subsequent tissue engineering applications. (B) The samples obtained were 6mm wide with a thickness of 2.15 ± 0.15 mm. "XY" denotes scaffolds cut longitudinally (left) relative to the celery stalk, while "CS" corresponds to cross sections (right). After a 3-day incubation period in 0.1% SDS, the samples became clear, indicating successful decellularization. (C) Decellularized scaffolds served as substrates for cell seeding, with approximately 50,000 cells applied and left on the scaffold for 4.5 h. This crucial step initiates cell attachment and colonization onto the scaffold matrix. The presence of the vascular bundle (V.B.) within the scaffold underscores its anatomical relevance and potential for vascularized tissue engineering approaches. This method offers a promising platform for developing tissue-engineered constructs using natural plant-based scaffolds. The transparency achieved post-decellularization facilitates cell visualization and analysis, aiding in the evaluation of cell behavior and tissue formation. This comprehensive approach bridges the gap between plant biology and tissue engineering, offering novel strategies for scaffold fabrication and cell seeding techniques. Further exploration of celery-derived scaffolds holds significant promise for regenerative medicine applications and organ-ona- chip technologies. (Reproduced, with permission, copyright 2020, bioRxiv)
Bone Tissue Engineering with Decellularized Plant-Based Scaffolds
Lee
-
Figure 5. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) cultivated in apple-derived scaffolds.
The diagram showcases a range of plant scaffolds, each characterized by distinct shapes and pore sizes. These attributes are critical for fostering the growth and development of iPSCs within the scaffolds. Understanding the morphology and porosity of these scaffolds is essential for optimizing cellular interactions, which is particularly important in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. By utilizing apple-derived scaffolds, researchers aim to leverage the unique properties of plant-based materials to support iPSC growth and differentiation in biomedical contexts. This visualization provides valuable insights into how scaffold architecture influences cell behavior and organization, offering potential avenues for enhancing the efficacy of iPSC-based therapies and tissue engineering strategies. (Reproduced, with permission, copyright 2019, Scientific Reports, Springer)
Latour
Regenerative Medicine
Regenerative decades have seen a growing interest within scholarly communities in the use of plant proteins as biodegradable and cytocompatible substances [56]. These proteins can be synthesized into fibers, hydrogels, micro- and nanoparticles, porous structures, and composites, exhibiting qualities suitable for tissue regeneration [43]. Notably, traditional tissue engineering materials often involve toxic solvents and non-environmentally friendly polymers, positioning regenerative medicine among the last fields to embrace green or eco-friendly procedures [57]. Plant protein scaffolds, like zein, soy protein, and wheat gluten, offer a sustainable alternative for regenerative medicine applications thanks to their mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and water stability [58]. The utilization of safe, eco-friendly materials and methods reduces the toxic and hazardous impacts of scientific research while minimizing energy consumption and waste production from various synthetic processes. One study demonstrated the production of a cross-linked porous scaffold based on a chitosan-soy protein blend system, employing the sol-gel method combined with freeze-drying [36]. The use of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) as a cross-linker enhanced the mechanical stability, degradation rate, and surface energy of the scaffolds. The silanol groups, associated with bone tissue engineering applications, may promote a mineral-type apatite surface under physiological conditions [52]. These scaffolds have also been investigated for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Another study developed porous membranes based on a cellulose-soy protein isolates (SPI) blend technique [22]. This approach involved blending SPI with hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), a water-soluble cellulose variant, to improve in vivo biodegradability of the composite scaffolds [59]. Epichlorohydrin (ECH) was utilized to cross-link SPI and HEC. The resulting films were biodegradable in vivo, with the rate of decomposition adjustable via the SPI concentration. Films containing over 30% SPI exhibited enhanced mechanical properties, water resistance, and appropriate biodegradability [60]. Gliadin and glutenin, two proteins from wheat gluten, were used to create membranes for potential tissue engineering scaffolds [61]. These films exhibited varied behaviors in water degradation and their ability to support fibroblast adhesion and proliferation. Submersion in water at pH 7.4 and 37°C for 15 days led to weight losses of 90% and 50% for wheat glutenin and gliadin, respectively [61]. Fibroblast cells found gliadin cytotoxic, whereas glutenin, devoid of gliadin and starch, was cytocompatible and significantly enhanced fibroblast cell adhesion and proliferation.
Particle leaching is a popular method for achieving regulated porosity in zein scaffolds [62]. In a study, a salt-leaching technique was employed to transform zein into a porous scaffold for potential bone applications. After 14 days of in vitro incubation, the zein scaffolds exhibited excellent porosity (75.3%–79.0%), strong pore interconnectivity, high mechanical properties, and a degradation rate of 89% with pepsin and 36% with collagenase [63]. The scaffolds facilitated the adhesion, growth, proliferation, and differentiation of hMSCs [64]. Another study used a solvent casting/particulate leaching approach to create a zein porous scaffold suitable for the growth of periodontal ligament cells (PDLCs), achieving appropriate porosity (64.1%–78.0%) and biocompatibility [43]. Additionally, a study utilized a similar method to construct porous scaffolds from zein/Polycaprolactone (PCL) composites for bone regeneration [62]. These biocomposite scaffolds displayed a well-connected network and a high porosity of around 70%. Compared to PCL scaffolds, zein/PCL scaffolds were more hydrophobic and degraded more rapidly after 28 days in PBS [65]. This research indicated that the degradation rate of the scaffolds could be tailored to match tissue regeneration rates by adjusting the zein concentration in the composite.
Cosmetics and Skin Care
Bioactive peptides (BP), specific protein fragments, play pivotal roles in the physiological functions of most living organisms. These BPs are involved in cellular signaling, developmental regulation, and defensive responses in plants. A study conducted on H2O2-stressed dermal human fibroblasts utilized an Avena sativa (oat) peptide-rich preparation derived from oat bran through enzymatic hydrolysis. The findings revealed that this preparation effectively reduced oxidative stress-induced cell damage by enhancing the activity of the enzyme Superoxide dismutase and inhibiting malondialdehyde (MDA) levels. Furthermore,
Future Perspectives
The promising outcomes of plant-based decellularization necessitate further research and development to fully harness its potential in regenerative medicine. Future studies should focus on refining decellularization techniques, thoroughly understanding the long-term effects of plant-based scaffolds, and scaling the methodology for clinical use. Comprehensive investigations into modifying decellularized plant tissues are essential to enhance their mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Creating a summary table of relevant publications detailing plant species, decellularization procedures, and key findings would be invaluable for researchers and practitioners in the field. Such a resource would consolidate knowledge, foster collaboration, and guide further exploration into diverse applications of plant-based decellularization. The advancement of plant decellularization should continue exploring various plant species and tissues to expand the range of potential scaffold materials. Active research in innovative scaffold fabrication techniques, including emerging applications in perfusable structures, is also crucial. Bridging the gap between biological sciences and engineering is key to establishing plant-based decellularization as a standard in tissue engineering. Ultimately, plant-based decellularization represents a revolutionary method with the potential to significantly impact regenerative medicine. By creating sustainable, cost-effective, and perfusable tissue engineering structures, this approach could revolutionize the field and contribute to next-generation therapeutics.
Conclusion
Plant-based decellularization represents a transformative and eco-friendly advancement in tissue engineering, offering innovative solutions for scaffold design and vascularization challenges. This article comprehensively examined the multifaceted aspects of plant-based decellularization, underscoring its potential to produce sustainable, cost-effective, and perfusable architectures for tissue engineering. The utilization of plant-derived materials, noted for their abundance and rapid growth, addresses critical concerns regarding sustainability and green chemistry, positioning this technology as a significant breakthrough in the field of regenerative medicine. The investigation covered essential components, including the methodologies for plant decellularization, challenges in scaffold production, various modification approaches, and case studies that demonstrate the practical applicability of this technology in tissue engineering. The article delved into both the advantages and challenges associated with plant-derived polymers, highlighting the significant potential of natural biopolymers to influence cell behavior and enhance biocompatibility. It discussed strategies such as post-spinning cross-linking and the blending of natural with synthetic polymers as methods to counteract inherent limitations, such as poor mechanical properties and rapid biodegradability. A unique and pivotal advantage of plant-based decellularization is its capacity to exploit the similarities between plant and animal vascular networks. By emulating the intricate, tapered, and branching network design akin to the human cardiovascular system, plant-based decellularization presents an innovative and groundbreaking strategy for creating perfusable scaffolds. This approach effectively addresses a critical limitation in contemporary bioengineering methods. The potential to develop scaffolds that support perfusion not only advances the field of tissue engineering but also paves the way for translating these solutions into clinical applications.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2019R1C1C1009606 and No. 2020R1A5A8018367)). This research was also supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF)& funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2022M3A9E4017151 & NRF-2022M3A9E4082654). This work was also supported by the Technology Innovation Program (or Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program (20015148) and the Alchemist Project (20012378) funded By the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea). This work was also supported by Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry(IPET) through the Agriculture and Food Convergence Technologies Program for Research Manpower development, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs(MAFRA)(project no. RS-2024-00397026).
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
Fig 1.
Fig 2.
Fig 3.
Fig 4.
Fig 5.
-
Table 1 . Type, Decellularization Method, Modification, Relevant Feature, and Potential Application of Each Scaffold Experiment..
Plant Species Decellularization Method Modification Relevant Feature Potential Application Reference Apple (McIntosh red Plant) 0.5% SDS for 12 h Type 1 Collagen coating High Porosity 3D scaffold Mammalian Cell Culture Modulevsky et al . 2014Leek ( Allium porrum )1% SDS for 5 days Graphene oxide coating Morphological structure 3D Scaffold Toker et al . 2018Spinach 10% SDS for 5 days, 1% Triton X-100 for 1 day, 0.1% Triton X-100 for 1 day, and 10% sodium hypochlorite solution for 4 h Gelatin coating Vasculature Angiogenesis Dikici et al . 2019Aptenia cordifolia Schwant leaves 10% SDS for 24 h followed by 0.5% Triton X-100 containing 1.2% sodium chlorite bleach for 24 h (perfusion) Grafting Vasculature Vascularization Wang et al . 2020Apple (McIntosh Red apple) 0.1% SDS for 48 h 1. Temporary molding with gelatin: 2 Permanent molding with collagen High Porosity; Versatility Template for blood vessel formation (in vivo) Hickey et al . 2018Spinach and Parsley; Artemisia annua leaves and Peanut hairy roots a. 10% SDS for 5 days followed by 0.1% Triton-X-100 in a 10% sodium chlorite bleach for 48 h; b. Perfusion; b. Soaking Fibronectin coating Vasculature Cardiac Tissue Engineering Gershlak et al . 2017Spinach 1% SDS for 24 h followed by 0.1% Triton X-100/10% bleach for 24 h (perfusion) 1 - Fibronectin coating; 2. Collagen IV coating Vasculature Cardiac Tissue Engineering Robbins et al . 2020Apple ( Malus domestica ), Carrot (Daucus carota ), Celery (Apium graveolens )0.1% SDS for 48 h Poly (L-lysine) Porosity and mechanical properties Adipose tissue (apple), Bone tissue engineering (carrot), Tendon (celery) Contessi Negrini et al . 2020Apple (McIntosh Red apple) 0.1% SDS for 48 h NA High Porosity 3D scaffold (in vivo) Subcutaneously Implanted Plant-Derived Cellulose Biomaterials Modulevsky et al . 2016Apple, Broccoli, Sweet pepper, Carrot, Persimmon, Jujube 0.5% SDS for 48 h NA Size and shape of pores Osteogenesis (in vivo) Lee et al . 2019Apple (McIntosh Red apple) 0.1% SDS for 48 h Collagen coating High Porosity Bone Tissue Engineering Latour et al . 2020Alathea zebrina ,Anthurium waroquaenum ,A. magnificum ,Laelia ancepts , Bamboo, Parsley, Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani10% SDS for 5 days followed by 0.1% Triton-X-100 in a 10% bleach for 48 h 1 - Functionalized by RGDOPA; 2 - Mineralization Hierarchical, hydrophilic, and interconnected ultrastructure 3D Scaffold Fontana et al . 2017Celery ( Apium graveolens )0.1% SDS for 72 h NA Vascular Bundle Channels Skeletal muscle Campuzano et al . 2020Piper betel, Sauropus androgynus ,Basella alba ,Azadirachta indica ,Centella asiatica ,Mentha spicata Leaves |0.1% Triton or 0.1% EDTA for 5 days NA Vasculature Vascularization Thippan et al . 2019Tobacco Bright Yellow-2 (BY-2) cells, Rice cells (Oryza sativa L.), Tobacco hairy roots ( N. Tabacum )DNase in combination with lyophilization NA Ease of genetic modification Pharmaceuticals Phan et al . 2020
References
- Zia KM, Tabasum S, Khan MF, Akram N, Akhter N, Noreen A,
et al . 2018. Recent trends on gellan gum blends with natural and synthetic polymers: a review.Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 109 : 1068-1087. - Benning L, Gutzweiler L, Tröndle K, Riba J, Zengerle R, Koltay P,
et al . 2018. Assessment of hydrogels for bioprinting of endothelial cells.J. Biomed. Mater. Res. - Part A 106 : 935-947. - Toprakhisar B, Nadernezhad A, Bakirci E, Khani N, Skvortsov GA, Koc B. 2018. Development of bioink from decellularized tendon extracellular matrix for 3D bioprinting.
Macromol. Biosci. 18 : e1800024. - Choi YJ, Cho DW, Lee H. 2022. Development of silk fibroin scaffolds by using indirect 3D-bioprinting technology.
Micromachines 13 : 43. - Maji S, Lee H. 2022. Engineering hydrogels for the development of three-dimensional in vitro models.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 : 2662. - Dai Y, Qiao K, Li D, Isingizwe P, Liu H, Liu Y,
et al . 2023. Plant-derived biomaterials and their potential in cardiac tissue repair.Adv. Healthc. Mater. 12 : e2202827. - Fontana G, Gershlak J, Adamski M, Lee JS, Matsumoto S, Le HD,
et al . 2017. Biofunctionalized plants as diverse biomaterials for human cell culture.Adv. Healthc. Mater. 6 : 10.1002/adhm.201601225. - Osi AR, Zhang H, Chen J, Zhou Y, Wang R, Fu J,
et al . 2021. Three-dimensional-printable thermo/photo-cross-linked methacrylated chitosan-gelatin hydrogel composites for tissue engineering.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 : 22902-22913. - Keane TJ, Swinehart IT, Badylak SF. 2015. Methods of tissue decellularization used for preparation of biologic scaffolds and in vivo relevance.
Methods 84 : 25-34. - Iravani S, Varma RS. 2019. Plants and plant-based polymers as scaffolds for tissue engineering.
Green Chem. 21 : 4839-4867. - Chae S, Ha DH, Lee H. 2023. 3D bioprinting strategy for engineering vascularized tissue models.
Int. J. Bioprinting 9 : 748. - Panwar A, Tan LP. 2016. Current status of bioinks for micro-extrusion-based 3D bioprinting.
Molecules 21 : 685. - Chen L, Liu J rong, Hu W fang, Gao J, Yang J yan. 2021. Vanadium in soil-plant system: source, fate, toxicity, and bioremediation.
J. Hazard. Mater. 405 : 124200. - Yenilmez B, Temirel M, Knowlton S, Lepowsky E, Tasoglu S. 2019. Development and characterization of a low-cost 3D bioprinter.
Bioprinting 13 : e00044. - Xing H, Lee H, Luo L, Kyriakides TR. 2020. Extracellular matrix-derived biomaterials in engineering cell function.
Biotechnol. Adv. 42 : 107421. - Hospodiuk M, Dey M, Sosnoski D, Ozbolat IT. 2017. The bioink: a comprehensive review on bioprintable materials.
Biotechnol. Adv. 35 : 217-239. - Lee H, Han W, Kim H, Ha DH, Jang J, Kim BS,
et al . 2017. Development of liver decellularized extracellular matrix bioink for threedimensional cell printing-based liver tissue engineering.Biomacromolecules 18 : 1229-1237. - Taylor DJ, Feher J, Halliday I, Hose DR, Gosling R, Aubiniere-R L,
et al . 2022. Refining our understanding of the flow through coronary artery branches; Revisiting Murray's law in human epicardial coronary arteries.Front. Mater. 13 : 871912. - Mironov V, Boland T, Trusk T, Forgacs G, Markwald RR. 2003. Organ printing: computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering.
Trends Biotechnol. 21 : 157-161. - Cidonio G, Cooke M, Glinka M, Dawson JI, Grover L, Oreffo ROC. 2019. Printing bone in a gel: using nanocomposite bioink to print functionalised bone scaffolds.
Mater. Today Bio 4 : 100028. - Gershlak JR, Hernandez S, Fontana G, Perreault LR, Hansen KJ, Larson SA,
et al . 2017. Crossing kingdoms: using decellularized plants as perfusable tissue engineering scaffolds.Biomaterials 125 : 13-22. - Qiu Y, McClements DJ, Chen J, Li C, Liu C, Dai T. 2023. Construction of 3D printed meat analogs from plant-based proteins: improving the printing performance of soy protein- and gluten-based pastes facilitated by rice protein.
Food Res. Int. 167 : 112635. - Bilirgen AC, Toker M, Odabas S, Yetisen AK, Garipcan B, Tasoglu S. 2021. Plant-based scaffolds in tissue engineering.
ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 7 : 926-938. - Zhu Y, Zhang Q, Wang S, Zhang J, Fan S, Lin X. 2021. Current advances in the development of decellularized plant extracellular matrix.
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9 : 712262. - Harris AF, Lacombe J, Zenhausern F. 2021. The emerging role of decellularized plant-based scaffolds as a new biomaterial.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 : 12347. - Harris AF, Lacombe J, Liyanage S, Han MY, Wallace E, Karsunky S,
et al . 2021. Supercritical carbon dioxide decellularization of plant material to generate 3D biocompatible scaffolds.Sci. Rep. 11 : 3643. - Ning L, Guillemot A, Zhao J, Kipouros G, Chen X. 2016. Influence of flow behavior of alginate-cell suspensions on cell viability and proliferation.
Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 22 : 652-662. - Fomby P, Cherlin AJ, Hadjizadeh A, Doillon CJ, Sueblinvong V,
et al . 2010. Stem cells and cell therapies in lung biology and diseases: conference report.Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 12 : 181-204. - Robbins ER, Pins GD, Laflamme MA, Gaudette GR. 2020. Creation of a contractile biomaterial from a decellularized spinach leaf without ECM protein coating: an in vitro study.
J. Biomed. Mater. Res. - Part A 108 : 2123-2132. - Wang Z, Lee SJ, Cheng HJ, Yoo JJ, Atala A. 2018. 3D bioprinted functional and contractile cardiac tissue constructs.
Acta Biomater. 70 : 48-56. - Ghosh S, Yi HG. 2022. A review on bioinks and their application in plant bioprinting.
Int. J. Bioprinting 8 : 172-204. - Hay ID, Rehman ZU, Moradali MF, Wang Y, Rehm BHA. 2013. Microbial alginate production, modification and its applications.
Microb. Biotechnol. 6 : 637-650. - Nasatto PL, Pignon F, Silveira JLM, Duarte MER, Noseda MD,
et al . 2015. Methylcellulose, a cellulose derivative with original physical properties and extended applications.Polymers (Basel). 7 : 777-803. - Yang X, Lu Z, Wu H, Li W, Zheng L, Zhao J. 2018. Collagen-alginate as bioink for three-dimensional (3D) cell printing based cartilage tissue engineering.
Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 83 : 195-201. - Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS. 2010. Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts.
Mater. Des. 31 : 287-295. - Silva SS, Oliveira JM, Mano JF, Reis RL. 2006. Physicochemical characterization of novel chitosan-soy protein/TEOS porous hybrids for tissue engineering applications.
Mater. Sci. Forum 514-516 : 1000-1004. - Yin J, Yan M, Wang Y, Fu J, Suo H. 2018. 3D Bioprinting of low-concentration cell-laden Gelatin Methacrylate (GelMA) bioinks with a two-step cross-linking strategy.
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 : 6849-6857. - Parodi I, Di Lisa D, Pastorino L, Scaglione S, Fato MM. 2023. 3D Bioprinting as a powerful technique for recreating the tumor microenvironment.
Gels 9 : 482. - Latour ML, Tarar M, Hickey RJ, Cuerrier CM, Catelas I,
et al . 2020. Plant-derived Cellulose Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.bioRxiv : 2020.01.15.906677. - Gao G, Lee JH, Jang J, Lee DH, Kong JS,
et al . 2017. Tissue engineered bio-blood-vessels constructed using a tissue-specific bioink and 3D coaxial cell printing technique: a novel therapy for ischemic disease.Adv. Funct. Mater. 27 . doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201700798. - Serra T, Mateos-Timoneda MA, Planell JA, Navarro M. 2013. 3D printed PLA-based scaffolds: a versatile tool in regenerative medicine.
Organogenesis 9 : 239-244. - Goulson D. 2013. An overview of the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoid insecticides.
J. Appl. Ecol. 50 : 977-987. - Xu W, Zhang X, Yang P, Långvik O, Wang X, Zhang Y,
et al . 2019. Surface engineered biomimetic inks based on UV cross-linkable wood biopolymers for 3D printing.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 : 12389-12400. - Yan-Zhi X, Jing-Jing W, Chen YP, Liu J, Li N, Yang F-Y. 2010. The use of zein and Shuanghuangbu for periodontal tissue engineering.
Int. J. Oral Sci. 2 : 142-148. - Boularaoui S, Al Hussein G, Khan KA, Christoforou N, Stefanini C. 2020. An overview of extrusion-based bioprinting with a focus on induced shear stress and its effect on cell viability.
Bioprinting 20 : e00093. - Moura D, Pereira RF, Gonçalves IC. 2022. Recent advances on bioprinting of hydrogels containing carbon materials.
Mater. Today Chem. 23 : 100617. - Munarin F, Tanzi MC, Petrini P. 2012. Advances in biomedical applications of pectin gels.
Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 51 : 681-689. - Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D, Ramani K, Chen Y,
et al . 2015. The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering.CAD Comput. Aided Des. 69 : 65-89. - Jansen K, Evangelopoulou M, Pou Casellas C, Abrishamcar S, Jansen J, Vermonden T,
et al . 2021. Spinach and chive for kidney tubule engineering: the limitations of decellularized plant scaffolds and vasculature.AAPS J. 23 : 11. - Turner PR, Murray E, McAdam CJ, McConnell MA, Cabral JD. 2020. Peptide chitosan/dextran core/shell vascularized 3D constructs for wound healing.
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 : 32328-32339. - Benton G, Arnaoutova I, George J, Kleinman HK, Koblinski J. 2014. Matrigel: from discovery and ECM mimicry to assays and models for cancer research.
Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 79 : 3-18. - Rodrigues MT, Leonor IB, Gröen N, Viegas CA, Dias IR, Caridade SG,
et al . 2014. Bone marrow stromal cells on a three-dimensional bioactive fiber mesh undergo osteogenic differentiation in the absence of osteogenic media supplements: the effect of silanol groups.Acta Biomater. 10 : 4175-4185. - Capozzi F, Carotenuto R, Giordano S, Spagnuolo V. 2018. Evidence on the effectiveness of mosses for biomonitoring of microplastics in fresh water environment.
Chemosphere 205 : 1-7. - Lee J, Jung H, Park N, Park SH, Ju JH. 2019. Induced osteogenesis in plants decellularized scaffolds.
Sci. Rep. 9 : 20194. - Modulevsky DJ, Cuerrier CM, Pelling AE. 2016. Biocompatibility of subcutaneously implanted plant-derived cellulose biomaterials.
PLoS One 11 : e0157894. - Sharma R, Smits IPM, De La Vega L, Lee C, Willerth SM. 2020. 3D Bioprinting pluripotent stem cell derived neural tissues using a novel fibrin bioink containing drug releasing microspheres.
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8 : 57. - Lee HY, Lee JW. 2023. Current status and future outlook of additive manufacturing technologies for the reconstruction of the trachea.
J. Funct. Biomater. 14 : 196. - Chiang JH, Loveday SM, Hardacre AK, Parker ME. 2019. Effects of soy protein to wheat gluten ratio on the physicochemical properties of extruded meat analogues.
Food Struct. 19 : 100102. - Markstedt K, Mantas A, Tournier I, Martínez Ávila H, Hägg D, Gatenholm P. 2015. 3D bioprinting human chondrocytes with nanocellulose-alginate bioink for cartilage tissue engineering applications.
Biomacromolecules 16 : 1489-1496. - Jansen K, Evangelopoulou M, Pou Casellas C, Abrishamcar S, Jansen J, Vermonden T,
et al . 2021. Spinach and chive for kidney tubule engineering: the limitations of decellularized plant scaffolds and vasculature.AAPS J. 23 : 11. - Reddy N, Yang Y. 2011. Potential of plant proteins for medical applications.
Trends Biotechnol. 29 : 490-498. - Wu F, Wei J, Liu C, O'Neill B, Ngothai Y. 2012. Fabrication and properties of porous scaffold of zein/PCL biocomposite for bone tissue engineering.
Compos. Part B Eng. 43 : 2192-2197. - Kim BS, Kwon Y W, Kong JS, Park GT, Gao G, Han W,
et al . 2018. 3D cell printing of in vitro stabilized skin model and in vivo prevascularized skin patch using tissue-specific extracellular matrix bioink: a step towards advanced skin tissue engineering.Biomaterials 168 : 38-53. - Kolesky DB, Homan KA, Skylar-Scott MA, Lewis JA. 2016. Three-dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113 : 3179-3184. - Janarthanan G, Tran HN, Cha E, Lee C, Das D, Noh I. 2020. 3D printable and injectable lactoferrin-loaded carboxymethyl celluloseglycol chitosan hydrogels for tissue engineering applications.
Mater. Sci. Eng. C Biol. Appl. 113 : 111008. - Burnett C, Bergfeld WF, Belsito DV, Hill RA, Klaassen CD, Liebler DC,
et al . 2018. Safety assessment of hydrolyzed wheat protein and hydrolyzed wheat gluten as used in cosmetics.Int. J. Toxicol. 37 : 55S-66S. - Brückner-Gühmann M, Kratzsch A, Sozer N, Drusch S. 2021. Oat protein as plant-derived gelling agent: Properties and potential of modification.
Future Foods 4 : 100053.