전체메뉴
검색
Article Search

JMB Journal of Microbiolog and Biotechnology

QR Code QR Code

Research article


References

  1. Houschyar KS, Borrelli MR, Tapking C, Popp D, Puladi B, Ooms M, et al. 2020. Molecular mechanisms of hair growth and regeneration: current understanding and novel paradigms. Dermatology 236: 271-280.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Kwack MH, Yang JM, Won GH, Kim MK, Kim JC, Sung YK. 2018. Establishment and characterization of five immortalized human scalp dermal papilla cell lines. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 496: 346-351.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Yang CC, Cotsarelis G. 2010. Review of hair follicle dermal cells. J. Dermatol. Sci. 57: 2-11.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  4. Lee SH, Samuels T, Bock JM, Blumin JH, Johnston N. 2015. Establishment of an immortalized laryngeal posterior commissure cell line as a tool for reflux research. Laryngoscope 125: E73-77.
    CrossRef
  5. Cruz ELS, Loureiro FJA, Silva A, Ramos RT, Kataoka M, Pinheiro JJV, et al. 2022. Gene expression in cell lines from human ameloblastoma immortalized using hTERT and HPV16-E6/E7. Oral Dis. 28: 2230-2238.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Ye D, Zhou X, Pan H, Jiang Q, Zhong L, Chen W, et al. 2011. Establishment and characterization of an HPV16 E6/E7-expressing oral squamous cell carcinoma cell line with enhanced tumorigenicity. Med. Oncol. 28: 1331-1337.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Zhan K, Lin M, Zhao QM, Zhan JS, Zhao GQ. 2016. Biological characterization of bovine mammary epithelial cell lines immortalized by HPV16 E6/E7 and SV40T. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 52: 906-910.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Ghittoni R, Accardi R, Hasan U, Gheit T, Sylla B, Tommasino M. 2010. The biological properties of E6 and E7 oncoproteins from human papillomaviruses. Virus Genes 40: 1-13.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Hamid NA, Brown C, Gaston K. 2009. The regulation of cell proliferation by the papillomavirus early proteins. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 66: 1700-1717.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Pett M, Coleman N. 2007. Integration of high-risk human papillomavirus: a key event in cervical carcinogenesis? J. Pathol. 212: 356-367.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Araldi RP, Sant'Ana TA, Modolo DG, de Melo TC, Spadacci-Morena DD, de Cassia Stocco R, et al. 2018. The human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancer biology: an overview. Biomed. Pharmacother. 106: 1537-1556.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Arizmendi-Izazaga A, Navarro-Tito N, Jimenez-Wences H, Mendoza-Catalan MA, Martinez-Carrillo DN, Zacapala-Gomez AE, et al. 2021. Metabolic reprogramming in cancer: role of HPV 16 variants. Pathogens 10: 347.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  13. Fukuda T, Furuya K, Takahashi K, Orimoto A, Sugano E, Tomita H, et al. 2021. Combinatorial expression of cell cycle regulators is more suitable for immortalization than oncogenic methods in dermal papilla cells. iScience 24: 101929.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  14. Cho YS, Kang JW, Cho M, Cho CW, Lee S, Choe YK, et al. 2001. Down modulation of IL-18 expression by human papillomavirus type 16 E6 oncogene via binding to IL-18. FEBS Lett. 501: 139-145.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH image to imageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9: 671-675.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  16. Vieira GV, Somera Dos Santos F, Lepique AP, da Fonseca CK, Innocentini L, Braz-Silva PH, et al. 2022. Proteases and HPV-induced carcinogenesis. Cancers (Basel) 14: 3038.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  17. Shirasawa H, Jin MH, Shimizu K, Akutsu N, Shino Y, Simizu B. 1994. Transcription-modulatory activity of full-length E6 and E6*I proteins of human papillomavirus type 16. Virology 203: 36-42.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Zheng Y, Li X, Jiao Y, Wu C. 2022. High-risk human papillomavirus oncogenic E6/E7 mRNAs splicing regulation. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 12: 929666.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  19. Williams AB, Schumacher B. 2016. p53 in the DNA-Damage-Repair Process. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 6: a026070.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  20. Chen J. 2016. The Cell-Cycle Arrest and Apoptotic Functions of p53 in Tumor Initiation and Progression. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 6: a026104.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  21. Hernandez Borrero LJ, El-Deiry WS. 2021. Tumor suppressor p53: Biology, signaling pathways, and therapeutic targeting. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 1876: 188556.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  22. Liu J, Zhang C, Hu W, Feng Z. 2019. Tumor suppressor p53 and metabolism. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 11: 284-292.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  23. Engeland K. 2018. Cell cycle arrest through indirect transcriptional repression by p53: I have a DREAM. Cell Death Differ. 25: 114-132.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  24. Hafner A, Bulyk ML, Jambhekar A, Lahav G. 2019. The multiple mechanisms that regulate p53 activity and cell fate. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20: 199-210.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Dutto I, Tillhon M, Cazzalini O, Stivala LA, Prosperi E. 2015. Biology of the cell cycle inhibitor p21(CDKN1A): molecular mechanisms and relevance in chemical toxicology. Arch. Toxicol. 89: 155-178.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Abukhdeir AM, Park BH. 2008. P21 and p27: roles in carcinogenesis and drug resistance. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 10: e19.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  27. Karimian A, Ahmadi Y, Yousefi B. 2016. Multiple functions of p21 in cell cycle, apoptosis and transcriptional regulation after DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst) 42: 63-71.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Hwang SG, Lee D, Kim J, Seo T, Choe J. 2002. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 binds to E2F1 and activates E2F1-driven transcription in a retinoblastoma protein-independent manner. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 2923-2930.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Engeland K. 2022. Cell cycle regulation: p53-p21-RB signaling. Cell Death Differ. 29: 946-960.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  30. Rubin SM, Sage J, Skotheim JM. 2020. Integrating old and new paradigms of G1/S control. Mol. Cell 80: 183-192.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  31. Makela JA, Toppari J. 2022. Retinoblastoma-E2F transcription factor interplay is essential for testicular development and male fertility. Front. Endocrinol (Lausanne). 13: 903684.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  32. Kent LN, Leone G. 2019. The broken cycle: E2F dysfunction in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 19: 326-338.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Chen X, Liu B, Li Y, Han L, Tang X, Deng W, et al. 2019. Dihydrotestosterone regulates hair growth through the Wnt/βeta-catenin pathway in C57BL/6 mice and in vitro organ culture. Front. Pharmacol. 10: 1528.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  34. Enshell-Seijffers D, Lindon C, Kashiwagi M, Morgan BA. 2010. Beta-catenin activity in the dermal papilla regulates morphogenesis and regeneration of hair. Dev. Cell 18: 633-642.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  35. Kiratipaiboon C, Tengamnuay P, Chanvorachote P. 2015. Glycyrrhizic acid attenuates stem cell-like phenotypes of human dermal papilla cells. Phytomedicine 22: 1269-1278.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Osada A, Iwabuchi T, Kishimoto J, Hamazaki TS, Okochi H. 2007. Long-term culture of mouse vibrissal dermal papilla cells and de novo hair follicle induction. Tissue Eng. 13: 975-982.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  37. Bejaoui M, Oliva AK, Ke MS, Ferdousi F, Isoda H. 2022. 3D Spheroid human dermal papilla cell as an effective model for the screening of hair growth promoting compounds: examples of minoxidil and 3,4,5-Tri-O-caffeoylquinic acid (TCQA). Cells 11: 2093.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  38. Kang BM, Kwack MH, Kim MK, Kim JC, Sung YK. 2012. Sphere formation increases the ability of cultured human dermal papilla cells to induce hair follicles from mouse epidermal cells in a reconstitution assay. J. Invest. Dermatol. 132: 237-239.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Reynolds AJ, Jahoda CA. 1996. Hair matrix germinative epidermal cells confer follicle-inducing capabilities on dermal sheath and high passage papilla cells. Development 122: 3085-3094.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. Kobayashi T, Fujisawa A, Amagai M, Iwasaki T, Ohyama M. 2011. Molecular biological and immunohistological characterization of canine dermal papilla cells and the evaluation of culture conditions. Vet. Dermatol. 22: 414-422.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Havlickova B, Biro T, Mescalchin A, Tschirschmann M, Mollenkopf H, Bettermann A, et al. 2009. A human folliculoid microsphere assay for exploring epithelial- mesenchymal interactions in the human hair follicle. J. Invest. Dermatol. 129: 972-983.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Radisky DC, LaBarge MA. 2008. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and the stem cell phenotype. Cell Stem Cell. 2: 511-512.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  43. Guo W, Keckesova Z, Donaher JL, Shibue T, Tischler V, Reinhardt F, et al. 2012. Slug and Sox9 cooperatively determine the mammary stem cell state. Cell 148: 1015-1028.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  44. Blanpain C, Lowry WE, Geoghegan A, Polak L, Fuchs E. 2004. Self-renewal, multipotency, and the existence of two cell populations within an epithelial stem cell niche. Cell 118: 635-648.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  45. Driskell RR, Giangreco A, Jensen KB, Mulder KW, Watt FM. 2009. Sox2-positive dermal papilla cells specify hair follicle type in mammalian epidermis. Development 136: 2815-2823.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef

Related articles in JMB

More Related Articles

Article

Research article

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024; 34(3): 506-515

Published online March 28, 2024 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2310.10035

Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Establishment and Characterization of Immortalized Human Dermal Papilla Cells Expressing Human Papillomavirus 16 E6/E7

Seonhwa Kim, Kyeong-Bae Jeon, Hyo-Min Park, Jinju Kim, Chae-Min Lim, and Do-Young Yoon*

Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to:Do-Young Yoon,       ydy4218@konkuk.ac.kr

Received: October 25, 2023; Revised: November 10, 2023; Accepted: November 11, 2023

Abstract

Primary human dermal papilla cells (HDPCs) are often preferred in studies on hair growth and regeneration. However, primary HDPCs are limited by their reduced proliferative capacity, decreased hair induction potential, and extended doubling times at higher passages. To overcome these limitations, pTARGET vectors containing human papillomavirus16 (HPV16) E6/E7 oncogenes were transfected into HDPCs and selected using G-148 to generate immortalized cells here. HPV16 E6/E7 oncogenes were efficiently transfected into primary HDPCs. Immortalized HDPC showed higher proliferative activity than primary HDPC, confirming an increased proliferation rate. Expression of p53 and pRb proteins was downregulated by E6 and E7, respectively. E6/E7 expressing HDPC cells revealed that cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor p21 expression was decreased, while cell cycle-related genes and proteins (CDK2 and cyclin E) and E2F family genes were upregulated. Immortalized HDPCs maintained their responsiveness to Wnt/β-catenin pathway and hair follicle formation capability, as indicated by their aggregative properties and stemness. E6/E7 immortalized HDPCs may facilitate in vitro hair growth and regeneration studies.

Keywords: Human dermal papilla cell, immortalization, human papillomavirus 16, E6/E7, Wnt/&beta,-catenin, hair follicle formation

Introduction

Hair dermal papilla cells (HDPCs) derived from the mesenchyme reside at the base of hair follicles. HPDCs play a crucial role in hair growth and development through interactions with the epithelial cells in hair follicles [1, 2]. The functions of HDPCs should be preserved to support continuous hair growth and development. However, cultured primary HDPCs lose hair inductive and proliferative capacity at higher passages [3]. Thus, establishing immortalized HDPCs that retain the properties of primary HDPCs is necessary for hair growth and regenerative research.

Transfection of cell lines with HPV16 genes, as in HPV infection of normal epithelial cells or transduction with lentiviral vectors harboring HPV E6/E7 genes, is an established method for cell line immortalization [4]. HPV16 E6/E7 oncogenes have been used to immortalize various cell lines, including human ameloblastoma, human oral epithelial, and bovine mammary epithelial cells [5-7]. HPV is a small, non-enveloped, double-stranded DNA virus that encodes early (E1, E2, E4, E5, E6, and E7) and late (L1 and L2) proteins [8]. Of these proteins, E6 and E7 oncoproteins from high-risk HPV promote cellular proliferation by deactivating p53 and retinoblastoma (Rb), respectively [9, 10]. E6 plays a central role in cell line immortalization by forming a ternary complex with the ubiquitin ligase E6 associated protein (E6AP) and p53 to trigger ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of p53 [11]. E7 is primarily located in the nucleus, where it binds and phosphorylates pRb, resulting in the release of E2F [12]. Immortalized HDPCs can be established by inactivating these major tumor suppressor proteins, p53 and pRb, through E6/E7 transfection [13].

Here, we transfected HPV16 E6/E7 oncogenes into early-passage primary HDPCs to generate immortalized HDPCs. We also performed an in vitro characterization of the immortalized HDPCs in terms of their proliferative capacity, Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway activity, and hair follicle formation capability.

Materials and Methods

Reagents

5α-Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) solution was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (#D-073, USA).

Cell Culture

Primary human follicular dermal papilla cells (HDPCs) were obtained from PromoCell GmbH (Germany). The cells were cultured in hair follicle dermal papilla cell growth medium supplemented with 40 μl/ml of fetal calf serum, 4 μl/ml of bovine pituitary extract, 1 ng/ml of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and 5 μg/ml of insulin. The HDPCs were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2. The cells were subjected to a maximum of 10 passages.

Transfection of HPV16 E6E7

pTARGET/E6E7 was prepared as previously described [14]. In short, E6/E7 derived from HPV16 were amplified by PCR from total RNA isolated from CaSki cell lines using a following primer set: 5’-GCG GCC GCC ACC ATG TTT CAG GAC CAC AG-3’ (Forward) and 5’-AGG CGG CCG CGA TTA TGG TTT CTG AGA ACA-3’ (Reverse). The PCR products were inserted into pCR2.1-TOPO cloning vector (Invitrogen, USA) and digested with EcoRI. The excised E6/E7 vector was ligated into the pTARGET vector (Promega) to construct pTARGET/E6E7. We transfected the pTARGET/E6E7 construct (5 μg/well) into primary HDPCs using the OmicsFect in vitro transfection reagent (OmicsBio, Taiwan). Twenty-four hours after transfection, 500 μg/ml of G-418 was added to the wells in the transfection group and incubated for an additional 24 h. Only G-418 selected cells were used.

Cell Viability Assay Using MTS Assay

Cell proliferation rate was estimated using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxy phenyl) -2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) assay with a CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution Assay (Promega, USA). Primary and immortalized HDPCs (1.0 × 104 cells/well) were seeded overnight in 100 μl of the medium in 96-well plates and then incubated for 0, 24, 48, and 72 h. The reagent (20 μl) was added to each well and incubated for 30 min. The absorbance was measured at 492 nm using a microplate reader (Apollo LB 9110; Berthold Technologies GmbH, Bad Wildbad, Germany).

RNA Isolation and Reverse-Transcription PCR (RT-PCR)

Primary and immortalized HDPCs were seeded in 6-well plates. When the cells reached 100% confluence, they were collected and lysed using an easy-BLUE Total RNA Extraction Kit (iNtRon Biotechnology, South Korea). For reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using oligo (dT) primers and M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (New England Biolabs, USA). RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using Prostar (Stratagene, USA). The synthesized cDNA was amplified using a PCR Thermal Cycler Dice (Takara, Japan). The primers used in this study are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 . Primer sequences and product sizes used in RT-PCR..

GenePrimerSequence (5’-3’)Product Size (bp)
E6ForwardATG TTT CAG GAC CCA CAG GA456
ReverseTTA CAG CTG GGT TTC TCT ACG
E7ForwardATG CAT GGA GAT ACA CCT AC200
ReverseAAC CGA AGC GTA GAG TCA CAC
E2F1ForwardAAG GCC CGA TCG ATG TTT TC51
ReverseTGA TCC CAC CTA CGG TCT CCT
E2F2ForwardGAG GAC AAG GCC AAC AAG AGG62
ReverseTTG CCA ACA GCA CGG ATA TC
E2F3ForwardGAA TAT CCC TAA ACC CGC TTC51
ReverseTGT CCT GAG TTG GTT GAA GCC
CDK2ForwardGCT ATC TGT TCC AGC TGC TC134
ReverseCTG GCT AGT CCA AAG TCT GC
CCNE1ForwardGTT ATA AGG GAG ACG GGG AG205
ReverseTGC TCT GCT TCT TAC CGC TC
TWISTForwardGCC AGG TAC GAC TTC CTC T122
ReverseTCC ATC CTC CAG ACC GAG AAG G
SNAILForwardTGC CCT CAA GATGCA CAT CCG A133
ReverseGGG ACA GGA GAA GGG CTT CTC
SLUGForwardATC TGC GGC AAG GCG TTT TCC A127
ReverseGAG CCC TCA GAT TTG ACC TGT C
ZEB1ForwardGCC AAT AAG CAA ACG ATT CTG101
ReverseTTT GGC TGG ATC ACT TTC AAG
SOX2ForwardCAT GAA GGA GCA CCC GGA TT189
ReverseTTC ATG TGC GCG TAA CTG TC
NANOGForwardACC AGT CCC AAA GGC AAA CA166
ReverseTCT GCT GGA GGC TGA GGT AT
GAPDHForwardAGA ACA TCA TCC CTG CCT CT131
ReverseCTG CTT CAC CAC CTT CTT GA


Immunoblotting Assay

Primary and immortalized HDPCs were seeded in 6-well plates and incubated until they reached 100%confluence. Harvested cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed in buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid, 1% NP40, 0.4 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM orthovanadate, 1 mM ethylene glycol tetra-acetic acid, 50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), and aprotinin (10 μg/ml) at 4°C for 30 min. Equal amounts of the quantified proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Specific primary antibodies against p53 (#NB200-171) (Novus Biologicals, Centennial, USA), cyclin E (#sc-481) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA), p21(#2947T), CDK2 (#2546T), pRb (#9309s), and p-pRb (#8147s) (Cell Signaling Technology, USA) were used. Densitometric graphs of three independent experiments were generated using ImageJ software (version 1.5) [15]. Band intensities were normalized to those of β-actin or GAPDH.

Immunofluorescence Staining

Primary and immortalized HDPCs were seeded in 8-well cell culture slides and incubated for another 24 h. Paraformaldehyde (4%) and methanol (100%) were used for cell fixation and permeabilization, respectively. BSA in PBS (1%) was used to block nonspecific binding of antibodies. Specific antibodies against p53 (1:2,000 dilution), pRb (1:200 dilution), and β-catenin (1:2000 dilution) (Sigma) were incubated overnight at 4°C. The cells were then incubated with goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies labeled with Cy3 or FITC (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany, 1:400 dilution) for 1 h. The cells were stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (1:1,000 dilution) (Sigma). A confocal fluorescence microscope (EVOSTM M7000; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA) with a 20× objective was used to obtain fluorescence images.

RGB Profiling of Immunofluorescence Images

Images were prepared to include a legend with a scaling bar to represent actual cell sizes. The scale was adjusted using the ImageJ software. Briefly, a representative cell was selected and a line was drawn at the location that passed through the nucleus. The fluorescence intensity along the drawn line was measured using the red-green-blue (RGB) profiler of ImageJ software. This generates a single plot that shows the profile of an RGB image in three different colors (red, green, and blue).

Evaluation of 3D Spheroid Construction Ability

To assess whether HDPCs induce the 3D spheroid, primary and immortalized HDPCs (1.5 × 105 cells/ml) were seeded in a 96-well round-bottom cell floater plate. The cells were incubated for 48 h to generate spheroids. Images of the 3D spheroids were obtained using a phase-contrast microscope. The average value of each spheroid was estimated by measuring the diameter five times using the ImageJ software.

Statistical Analysis

Data were presented as the mean standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments. GraphPad Prism 9 software (GraphPad Software Inc., USA) was used for the statistical analysis. Unpaired t-tests were used. Statistical significance was defined as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.

Results

Detection of HPV16 E6/E7 in HDPCs

The primary HDPC cells were stably transfected with either E6/E7 from the integrated HPV16 genome or a mock vector, and the effect of E6/E7 on cell cycle progression was investigated. RT-PCR was used to quantify the expression of E6 and E7 in the respective transfectants (Fig. 1A and 1B). HPV16 E6 and E7 mRNA levels were significantly higher in immortalized HDPCs compared to primary HDPCs. Most E6 transcripts were full-length E6, and the spliced form E6*I was detected at low levels.

Figure 1. Quantification of E6 and E7 expression in HDPCs. (A) Expression levels of E6, E7, and GAPDH were determined. (B) The relative band intensities of E6, E6*I and E7 to GAPDH were assessed by ImageJ software. Data are exhibited as the mean SD (n = 3). **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by t-test.

The Effect of E6/E7 on Proliferation and Morphology in HDPCs

The proliferation rates of primary and immortalized HDPCs were determined using the MTS assay. The rate was measured every 24 h for 72 h. The proliferation rates of primary and immortalized HDPCs were 149.7% and 255.3%, respectively. Hence, HPV16 E6/E7 immortalized HDPCs proliferated at a 1.71-fold higher rate than primary HDPCs under the same conditions (Fig. 2A). Both primary and immortalized HDPCs showed uniform cell sizes and did not show any differences from each other (Fig. 2B). These results indicate that E6/E7 oncoproteins increase the proliferation rate without affecting cell characteristics.

Figure 2. Comparison of cell growth and morphology between primary and immortalized HDPCs. (A) Cell growth curves of primary and E6/E7 immortalized HDPCs. Data are exhibited as the mean SD (n = 3). **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001 by t-test. (B) Comparison of cell morphological features between primary and immortalized HDPC. Cell morphologies were confirmed by an inverted phase contrast microscope (magnification at × 4). Scale bar = 500 μm.

The Effect of E6 on Expression of p53 and Cell Cycle Related Factors

First, p53 levels were quantified in primary and immortalized HDPCs. Gene expression levels of TP53 were not altered (Fig. 3A), whereas expression of p53 protein was downregulated (Fig. 3B). Downregulation of p53 protein expression in immortalized HDPCs, especially in the nucleus, was also confirmed using immunofluorescence staining (Fig. 3C). We then assessed the effect of E6/E7 on the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor p21. p21 protein expression was downregulated in immortalized HDPCs (Fig. 3D). CDK2 and CCNE1 mRNA levels were upregulated in immortalized HDPC (Fig. 3E). Protein expression levels of CDK2 and cyclin E were also increased in E6/E7 immortalized HDPCs (Fig. 3A and 3B). These results indicate that p53 is degraded through the proteasome via E6, leading to the decrease in p21 expression, and increase in CDK and cyclin E.

Figure 3. Expression levels of p53 and cell cycle related factors in HDPCs. (A, B) The TP53 gene and p53 protein expression level was determined. The relative band intensities were evaluated by ImageJ software. Data are presented as the mean SD (n = 3). ***p < 0.001 by t-test. (C) p53 was labeled with Cy3 (red) in cells, and nuclei were labeled with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 125 μm. (D) The protein level of CDK inhibitor p21 was determined by immunoblotting assay. (E-G) The gene (CDK2 and CCNE1) and protein (CDK2 and cyclin E) expression levels were determined. The relative band intensities were evaluated by ImageJ software. Data are presented as the mean SD (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 by t-test.

The Effect of E7 on Expression Levels of pRb and Transcription Factor E2F

Next, the direct effects of E7 on pRb and E2F expression in HDPCs were evaluated. Immunofluorescence staining revealed that pRb expression was downregulated in immortalized HDPCs, especially in the nucleus (Fig. 4A). The reduction in pRb expression and increase in p-pRb levels in immortalized HDPCs were also confirmed by immunoblotting assays (Fig. 4B and 4C). In addition, mRNA levels of E2F factors, including E2F1, E2F2, and E2F3, were increased in immortalized HDPCs (Fig. 4D). These results indicate that E7 hyperphosphorylates pRb, leading to the release of E2F which promotes transcription of genes involved in G1-S transition.

Figure 4. Expression levels of pRb protein and E2F genes in HDPCs. (A) pRb was labeled with FITC (green) in cells, and nuclei were labeled with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 125 μm. (B, C) The pRb and p-pRb protein level was determined by immunoblotting assay. The relative band intensities were evaluated by ImageJ software. Data are presented as the mean SD. **p < 0.01 by t-test. (D) The gene expression levels of E2F1-3 were determined. The relative band intensities were evaluated by ImageJ software. Data are reported as the mean SD (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by t-test.

Responsiveness to Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling and Hair Follicle Induction in E6/E7 Immortalized HDPCs

Primary and immortalized HDPCs were treated with DHT (1 μM) to assess their Wnt/β-catenin pathway responsiveness. DHT treatment for 2 h inhibited the nuclear translocation of β-catenin in both HDPC types (Fig. 5A). By RGB line profiling, it was also confirmed that β-catenin intensity in the nucleus was low (Fig. 5B). These findings indicate that immortalized HDPCs retained their responsiveness to the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.

Figure 5. Responses to Wnt/β-catenin signaling and hair follicle formation capability in HDPCs. (A) β-catenin was labeled with Cy3 (red) in cells, and nuclei were labeled with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 125 μm. (B) Fluorescence intensity was profiled (white arrow sign on third line of (A)). (C, D) Representative image of 3D spheroid was confirmed (magnification at × 4). Scale bar = 500 μm. The size in diameter of spheroids were quantified by ImageJ software. (E, F) The gene expressions of EMT markers (TWIST, SNAIL, SLUG, and ZEB1) and self-renewal markers (SOX2 and NANOG) were estimated. The relative band intensities were evaluated by ImageJ software. Data are reported as the mean SD (n = 3). **p < 0.01 by t-test.

Since the induction of hair follicles is related to the aggregation of HDPCs, we also investigated their 3D spheroid formation capability of the transfected cells. Both primary and immortalized HDPCs formed round and compact 3D spheroids with a size of approximately 420 μm (Fig. 5C and 5D). To confirm whether E6/E7 affects the stemness of HDPCs, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and self-renewal markers were quantified. EMT markers were well expressed even in the immortalized HDPCs (Fig. 5E). Immortalized HDPCs showed a slight decrease in SOX2 expression, whereas there were no noticeable differences in NANOG expression (Fig. 5F). These results indicated that both the aggregation ability and stem cell-like characteristics were preserved in immortalized HDPCs.

Discussion

In this study, we established and characterized immortalized HDPCs via E6/E7 transfection. E6 and E7 oncoproteins from high-risk HPV16 inhibit p53 and pRb, respectively, and thereby enable cellular immortalization [16]. Full-length E6 open reading frames (ORF) (450 bp) and truncated E6 ORFs including E6*I (300 bp) and E6*II (150 bp) are generated by splicing of HPV16 E6 [17]. Full-length E6, truncated E6*I, and E7 were detected only in immortalized HDPC (Fig. 1). Moreover, immortalized cells showed a 1.71-fold higher proliferation rate than primary cells, with no morphological changes (Fig. 2).

HPV E6*I binds p53 to induce proteasomal degradation of p53, which may result in cell immortalization [18]. p53 regulates cellular responses including DNA repair, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis induction, and metabolism [19-22]. TP53 expression did not differ between primary and immortalized HDPCs (Fig. 3A). However, p53 protein levels were lower in immortalized HDPCs compared to primary HDPCs (Fig. 3B-3C). These results indicate that p53 underwent increased proteasomal degradation through binding to the E6 protein. The CDK inhibitor p21 is the transcriptional target of p53. When activated, p53 binds the p21 promoter to increase transcription [23, 24]. As expected, p21 protein expression was decreased due to the downregulated p53 (Fig. 3D). p21 regulates cell cycle progression by inhibiting CDK proteins, which form complexes with cyclin to control various cell cycle stages [25]. The G1-S phase transition is associated with CDK2, which is activated by cyclin E1 and E2 [26, 27]. CDK2 and CCNE1 mRNA levels and CDK2 and cyclin E protein levels were significantly upregulated in immortalized HDPCs (Fig. 3E-3G). These upregulations promote G1-S transition and induce cell proliferation.

E7 in high-risk HPVs has a higher affinity for pRb than E7 in low-risk HPVs, leading to a reduction in pRb level [28]. E7 interacts with retinoblastoma (Rb) family proteins, such as pRb, p107, and p130 [29]. pRb expression was decreased in immortalized HDPCs (Fig. 4A-4B). However, p-pRb expression was increased compared to primary HDPCs (Fig. 4C), which was due to the increase in CDK and cyclin E as shown in Fig. 3E-3F. Upon formation in G1, cyclin E-CDK2 complexes translocate to the nucleus and phosphorylate pRb, effectively inactivating it [30]. Free E2F regulates the expression of genes, including cyclin, CDK, and E2F themselves, which regulate the G1-S transition [26, 31]. Only E2F1-3 among the E2F family bind pRb, and its overexpression efficiently induces G1-S transition [28, 32]. We measured E2F1, E2F2, and E2F3 mRNA levels in the two types of HDPCs and found significant upregulation in immortalized HDPCs (Fig. 4D). This upregulation was expected to increase the expression of genes critical for G1-S transition.

As a potent androgen, DHT plays a key role in regulating the hair cycle. Hair cycling relies on crosstalk between the androgen and Wnt/β-catenin pathways [33]. Wnt/β-catenin pathway is active in the dermal papilla of growing hair follicles during the anagen phase, and maintaining the activity of this signaling pathway is essential for preserving cultured HDPCs in a state that promote hair growth [34]. β-catenin activity was inhibited by DHT treatment (Fig. 5A and 5B), confirming that the response to Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway sustained functional even in immortalized HDPCs.

HDPCs are multipotent stem cells and their aggregative properties and stemness are associated with hair follicle formation [35, 36]. 3D spheroids efficiently induce HDPC that can form hair follicles in the skin [37]. Previous studies demonstrated that 3D spheroids of HDPCs form de novo hair follicles on mice skin [38]. Models with co-cultures incorporating both dermal papilla cells and keratinocytes have also been developed, providing evidence that their co-cultivation effectively preserves the in vivo properties of dermal papilla cells [39, 40]. The human folliculoid microsphere, consisting of HDPC and outer root sheath keratinocytes, has also been reported. This model demonstrated close interaction between the two types of cells and expressed versican, which is essential for hair follicle formation [41]. In addition, maintenance of the stem cell-like characteristics is crucial to maintain HDPC functionality. EMT and self-renewal factors are markers of stemness in HDPCs [35]. Transcription factors such as Twist, Snail, and Slug are found in cells undergoing EMT and play a significant role in preserving stem cell function [42, 43]. Self-renewal, a key characteristic of stem cells, is facilitated by SOX2 and NANOG [44]. SOX2 is a well-known HDPCs marker [45]. Thus, the aggregative behavior, EMT markers (TWIST, SNAIL, SLUG, and ZEB1), and self-renewal markers (SOX2 and NANOG) were evaluated in both cell types. E6/E7 transfection did not affect the aggregation or stemness of HDPCs (Fig. 5C-5F). This suggests that immortalized HDPCs retained their ability to form hair follicles while maintaining their characteristic features.

Conclusion

Here, we established and characterized immortalized HPDC cells by transfecting them with the HPV 16 E6/E7 oncogenes. Upon transfection, proliferation rate of cells was promoted through regulating of p53 and pRb activity. The cells also exhibited preserved responsiveness to the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, and retained their ability to form hair follicles, as demonstrated by their aggregating properties and stem cell characteristics. Immortalized HDPCs may be useful for in vitro research on mechanisms of hair growth and regeneration.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (grant number 2021R1A2C3014577) and Konkuk University Researcher Fund in 2023. We thank our colleagues for their assistance with this study.

Author Contributions

Seonhwa Kim: conceptualization, investigation, visualization, formal analysis, and writing of the original draft; Kyeong-Bae Jeon, conceptualization, and investigation; Hyo-Min Park, investigation; Jinju Kim, investigation; Chae-Min Lim, investigation; Do -Young Yoon, conceptualization, supervision, writing of the review and editing, funding acquisition, and project administration. All the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Abbreviations

CDK: cyclin dependent kinase, DHT: 5α-dihydrotestosterone, EMT: epithelial-mesenchymal transition, HDPC: human dermal papilla cell, HPV16: human papillomavirus 16, Rb: retinoblastoma

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Quantification of E6 and E7 expression in HDPCs. (A) Expression levels of E6, E7, and GAPDH were determined. (B) The relative band intensities of E6, E6*I and E7 to GAPDH were assessed by ImageJ software. Data are exhibited as the mean SD (n = 3). **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by t-test.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 506-515https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2310.10035

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Comparison of cell growth and morphology between primary and immortalized HDPCs. (A) Cell growth curves of primary and E6/E7 immortalized HDPCs. Data are exhibited as the mean SD (n = 3). **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001 by t-test. (B) Comparison of cell morphological features between primary and immortalized HDPC. Cell morphologies were confirmed by an inverted phase contrast microscope (magnification at × 4). Scale bar = 500 μm.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 506-515https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2310.10035

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Expression levels of p53 and cell cycle related factors in HDPCs. (A, B) The TP53 gene and p53 protein expression level was determined. The relative band intensities were evaluated by ImageJ software. Data are presented as the mean SD (n = 3). ***p < 0.001 by t-test. (C) p53 was labeled with Cy3 (red) in cells, and nuclei were labeled with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 125 μm. (D) The protein level of CDK inhibitor p21 was determined by immunoblotting assay. (E-G) The gene (CDK2 and CCNE1) and protein (CDK2 and cyclin E) expression levels were determined. The relative band intensities were evaluated by ImageJ software. Data are presented as the mean SD (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 by t-test.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 506-515https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2310.10035

Fig 4.

Figure 4.Expression levels of pRb protein and E2F genes in HDPCs. (A) pRb was labeled with FITC (green) in cells, and nuclei were labeled with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 125 μm. (B, C) The pRb and p-pRb protein level was determined by immunoblotting assay. The relative band intensities were evaluated by ImageJ software. Data are presented as the mean SD. **p < 0.01 by t-test. (D) The gene expression levels of E2F1-3 were determined. The relative band intensities were evaluated by ImageJ software. Data are reported as the mean SD (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by t-test.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 506-515https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2310.10035

Fig 5.

Figure 5.Responses to Wnt/β-catenin signaling and hair follicle formation capability in HDPCs. (A) β-catenin was labeled with Cy3 (red) in cells, and nuclei were labeled with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 125 μm. (B) Fluorescence intensity was profiled (white arrow sign on third line of (A)). (C, D) Representative image of 3D spheroid was confirmed (magnification at × 4). Scale bar = 500 μm. The size in diameter of spheroids were quantified by ImageJ software. (E, F) The gene expressions of EMT markers (TWIST, SNAIL, SLUG, and ZEB1) and self-renewal markers (SOX2 and NANOG) were estimated. The relative band intensities were evaluated by ImageJ software. Data are reported as the mean SD (n = 3). **p < 0.01 by t-test.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 506-515https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2310.10035

Table 1 . Primer sequences and product sizes used in RT-PCR..

GenePrimerSequence (5’-3’)Product Size (bp)
E6ForwardATG TTT CAG GAC CCA CAG GA456
ReverseTTA CAG CTG GGT TTC TCT ACG
E7ForwardATG CAT GGA GAT ACA CCT AC200
ReverseAAC CGA AGC GTA GAG TCA CAC
E2F1ForwardAAG GCC CGA TCG ATG TTT TC51
ReverseTGA TCC CAC CTA CGG TCT CCT
E2F2ForwardGAG GAC AAG GCC AAC AAG AGG62
ReverseTTG CCA ACA GCA CGG ATA TC
E2F3ForwardGAA TAT CCC TAA ACC CGC TTC51
ReverseTGT CCT GAG TTG GTT GAA GCC
CDK2ForwardGCT ATC TGT TCC AGC TGC TC134
ReverseCTG GCT AGT CCA AAG TCT GC
CCNE1ForwardGTT ATA AGG GAG ACG GGG AG205
ReverseTGC TCT GCT TCT TAC CGC TC
TWISTForwardGCC AGG TAC GAC TTC CTC T122
ReverseTCC ATC CTC CAG ACC GAG AAG G
SNAILForwardTGC CCT CAA GATGCA CAT CCG A133
ReverseGGG ACA GGA GAA GGG CTT CTC
SLUGForwardATC TGC GGC AAG GCG TTT TCC A127
ReverseGAG CCC TCA GAT TTG ACC TGT C
ZEB1ForwardGCC AAT AAG CAA ACG ATT CTG101
ReverseTTT GGC TGG ATC ACT TTC AAG
SOX2ForwardCAT GAA GGA GCA CCC GGA TT189
ReverseTTC ATG TGC GCG TAA CTG TC
NANOGForwardACC AGT CCC AAA GGC AAA CA166
ReverseTCT GCT GGA GGC TGA GGT AT
GAPDHForwardAGA ACA TCA TCC CTG CCT CT131
ReverseCTG CTT CAC CAC CTT CTT GA

References

  1. Houschyar KS, Borrelli MR, Tapking C, Popp D, Puladi B, Ooms M, et al. 2020. Molecular mechanisms of hair growth and regeneration: current understanding and novel paradigms. Dermatology 236: 271-280.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Kwack MH, Yang JM, Won GH, Kim MK, Kim JC, Sung YK. 2018. Establishment and characterization of five immortalized human scalp dermal papilla cell lines. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 496: 346-351.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Yang CC, Cotsarelis G. 2010. Review of hair follicle dermal cells. J. Dermatol. Sci. 57: 2-11.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Lee SH, Samuels T, Bock JM, Blumin JH, Johnston N. 2015. Establishment of an immortalized laryngeal posterior commissure cell line as a tool for reflux research. Laryngoscope 125: E73-77.
    CrossRef
  5. Cruz ELS, Loureiro FJA, Silva A, Ramos RT, Kataoka M, Pinheiro JJV, et al. 2022. Gene expression in cell lines from human ameloblastoma immortalized using hTERT and HPV16-E6/E7. Oral Dis. 28: 2230-2238.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Ye D, Zhou X, Pan H, Jiang Q, Zhong L, Chen W, et al. 2011. Establishment and characterization of an HPV16 E6/E7-expressing oral squamous cell carcinoma cell line with enhanced tumorigenicity. Med. Oncol. 28: 1331-1337.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Zhan K, Lin M, Zhao QM, Zhan JS, Zhao GQ. 2016. Biological characterization of bovine mammary epithelial cell lines immortalized by HPV16 E6/E7 and SV40T. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 52: 906-910.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Ghittoni R, Accardi R, Hasan U, Gheit T, Sylla B, Tommasino M. 2010. The biological properties of E6 and E7 oncoproteins from human papillomaviruses. Virus Genes 40: 1-13.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Hamid NA, Brown C, Gaston K. 2009. The regulation of cell proliferation by the papillomavirus early proteins. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 66: 1700-1717.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Pett M, Coleman N. 2007. Integration of high-risk human papillomavirus: a key event in cervical carcinogenesis? J. Pathol. 212: 356-367.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Araldi RP, Sant'Ana TA, Modolo DG, de Melo TC, Spadacci-Morena DD, de Cassia Stocco R, et al. 2018. The human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancer biology: an overview. Biomed. Pharmacother. 106: 1537-1556.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Arizmendi-Izazaga A, Navarro-Tito N, Jimenez-Wences H, Mendoza-Catalan MA, Martinez-Carrillo DN, Zacapala-Gomez AE, et al. 2021. Metabolic reprogramming in cancer: role of HPV 16 variants. Pathogens 10: 347.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Fukuda T, Furuya K, Takahashi K, Orimoto A, Sugano E, Tomita H, et al. 2021. Combinatorial expression of cell cycle regulators is more suitable for immortalization than oncogenic methods in dermal papilla cells. iScience 24: 101929.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Cho YS, Kang JW, Cho M, Cho CW, Lee S, Choe YK, et al. 2001. Down modulation of IL-18 expression by human papillomavirus type 16 E6 oncogene via binding to IL-18. FEBS Lett. 501: 139-145.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH image to imageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9: 671-675.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. Vieira GV, Somera Dos Santos F, Lepique AP, da Fonseca CK, Innocentini L, Braz-Silva PH, et al. 2022. Proteases and HPV-induced carcinogenesis. Cancers (Basel) 14: 3038.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. Shirasawa H, Jin MH, Shimizu K, Akutsu N, Shino Y, Simizu B. 1994. Transcription-modulatory activity of full-length E6 and E6*I proteins of human papillomavirus type 16. Virology 203: 36-42.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Zheng Y, Li X, Jiao Y, Wu C. 2022. High-risk human papillomavirus oncogenic E6/E7 mRNAs splicing regulation. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 12: 929666.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Williams AB, Schumacher B. 2016. p53 in the DNA-Damage-Repair Process. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 6: a026070.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  20. Chen J. 2016. The Cell-Cycle Arrest and Apoptotic Functions of p53 in Tumor Initiation and Progression. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 6: a026104.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  21. Hernandez Borrero LJ, El-Deiry WS. 2021. Tumor suppressor p53: Biology, signaling pathways, and therapeutic targeting. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 1876: 188556.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Liu J, Zhang C, Hu W, Feng Z. 2019. Tumor suppressor p53 and metabolism. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 11: 284-292.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Engeland K. 2018. Cell cycle arrest through indirect transcriptional repression by p53: I have a DREAM. Cell Death Differ. 25: 114-132.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  24. Hafner A, Bulyk ML, Jambhekar A, Lahav G. 2019. The multiple mechanisms that regulate p53 activity and cell fate. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20: 199-210.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Dutto I, Tillhon M, Cazzalini O, Stivala LA, Prosperi E. 2015. Biology of the cell cycle inhibitor p21(CDKN1A): molecular mechanisms and relevance in chemical toxicology. Arch. Toxicol. 89: 155-178.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Abukhdeir AM, Park BH. 2008. P21 and p27: roles in carcinogenesis and drug resistance. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 10: e19.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  27. Karimian A, Ahmadi Y, Yousefi B. 2016. Multiple functions of p21 in cell cycle, apoptosis and transcriptional regulation after DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst) 42: 63-71.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Hwang SG, Lee D, Kim J, Seo T, Choe J. 2002. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 binds to E2F1 and activates E2F1-driven transcription in a retinoblastoma protein-independent manner. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 2923-2930.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Engeland K. 2022. Cell cycle regulation: p53-p21-RB signaling. Cell Death Differ. 29: 946-960.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Rubin SM, Sage J, Skotheim JM. 2020. Integrating old and new paradigms of G1/S control. Mol. Cell 80: 183-192.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Makela JA, Toppari J. 2022. Retinoblastoma-E2F transcription factor interplay is essential for testicular development and male fertility. Front. Endocrinol (Lausanne). 13: 903684.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Kent LN, Leone G. 2019. The broken cycle: E2F dysfunction in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 19: 326-338.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Chen X, Liu B, Li Y, Han L, Tang X, Deng W, et al. 2019. Dihydrotestosterone regulates hair growth through the Wnt/βeta-catenin pathway in C57BL/6 mice and in vitro organ culture. Front. Pharmacol. 10: 1528.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Enshell-Seijffers D, Lindon C, Kashiwagi M, Morgan BA. 2010. Beta-catenin activity in the dermal papilla regulates morphogenesis and regeneration of hair. Dev. Cell 18: 633-642.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  35. Kiratipaiboon C, Tengamnuay P, Chanvorachote P. 2015. Glycyrrhizic acid attenuates stem cell-like phenotypes of human dermal papilla cells. Phytomedicine 22: 1269-1278.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Osada A, Iwabuchi T, Kishimoto J, Hamazaki TS, Okochi H. 2007. Long-term culture of mouse vibrissal dermal papilla cells and de novo hair follicle induction. Tissue Eng. 13: 975-982.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  37. Bejaoui M, Oliva AK, Ke MS, Ferdousi F, Isoda H. 2022. 3D Spheroid human dermal papilla cell as an effective model for the screening of hair growth promoting compounds: examples of minoxidil and 3,4,5-Tri-O-caffeoylquinic acid (TCQA). Cells 11: 2093.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  38. Kang BM, Kwack MH, Kim MK, Kim JC, Sung YK. 2012. Sphere formation increases the ability of cultured human dermal papilla cells to induce hair follicles from mouse epidermal cells in a reconstitution assay. J. Invest. Dermatol. 132: 237-239.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Reynolds AJ, Jahoda CA. 1996. Hair matrix germinative epidermal cells confer follicle-inducing capabilities on dermal sheath and high passage papilla cells. Development 122: 3085-3094.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. Kobayashi T, Fujisawa A, Amagai M, Iwasaki T, Ohyama M. 2011. Molecular biological and immunohistological characterization of canine dermal papilla cells and the evaluation of culture conditions. Vet. Dermatol. 22: 414-422.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Havlickova B, Biro T, Mescalchin A, Tschirschmann M, Mollenkopf H, Bettermann A, et al. 2009. A human folliculoid microsphere assay for exploring epithelial- mesenchymal interactions in the human hair follicle. J. Invest. Dermatol. 129: 972-983.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Radisky DC, LaBarge MA. 2008. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and the stem cell phenotype. Cell Stem Cell. 2: 511-512.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  43. Guo W, Keckesova Z, Donaher JL, Shibue T, Tischler V, Reinhardt F, et al. 2012. Slug and Sox9 cooperatively determine the mammary stem cell state. Cell 148: 1015-1028.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  44. Blanpain C, Lowry WE, Geoghegan A, Polak L, Fuchs E. 2004. Self-renewal, multipotency, and the existence of two cell populations within an epithelial stem cell niche. Cell 118: 635-648.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  45. Driskell RR, Giangreco A, Jensen KB, Mulder KW, Watt FM. 2009. Sox2-positive dermal papilla cells specify hair follicle type in mammalian epidermis. Development 136: 2815-2823.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef