전체메뉴
검색
Article Search

JMB Journal of Microbiolog and Biotechnology

QR Code QR Code

Research article


References

  1. Selleck P, Kirkland P. Avian influenza, Australia: Australian and New Zealand standard diagnostic procedures for animal diseases, Sub-Committee on Animal Health Laboratory Standards for Animal Health Committee; 2009. http://www.scahls.org.au. cited 2010 Feb 14.
  2. Blagodatski A, Trutneva K, Glazova O, Mityaeva O, Shevkova L, Kegeles E, et al. 2021. Avian influenza in wild birds and poultry: Dissemination pathways, monitoring methods, and virus ecology. Pathogens 10: 630.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  3. Shirvani E, Varghese BP, Paldurai A, Samal SK. 2020. A recombinant avian paramyxovirus serotype 3 expressing the hemagglutinin protein protects chickens against H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus challenge. Sci. Rep. 10: 2221.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  4. Byrne AM, Reid SM, Seekings AH, Núñez A, Obeso Prieto AB, Ridout S, et al. 2021. H7N7 avian influenza virus mutation from low to high pathogenicity on a layer chicken farm in the UK. Viruses 13: 259.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  5. Seekings A, Slomka M, Russell C, Howard W, Choudhury B, Nunez A, et al. 2018. Direct evidence of H7N7 avian influenza virus mutation from low to high virulence on a single poultry premises during an outbreak in free range chickens in the UK, 2008. Infect. Genet. Evol. 64: 13-31.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Laleye AT, Abolnik C. 2020. Emergence of highly pathogenic H5N2 and H7N1 influenza A viruses from low pathogenic precursors by serial passage in ovo. PLoS One 15: e0240290.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  7. Dhingra MS, Artois J, Dellicour S, Lemey P, Dauphin G, Von Dobschuetz S, et al. 2018. Geographical and historical patterns in the emergences of novel highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5 and H7 viruses in poultry. Front. Vet. Sci. 5: 84.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  8. Lee YN, Lee DH, Cheon SH, Park YR, Baek YG, Si YJ, et al. 2020. Genetic characteristics and pathogenesis of H5 low pathogenic avian influenza viruses from wild birds and domestic ducks in South Korea. Sci. Rep. 10: 12151.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  9. Taubenberger J, Morens D. 2009. Pandemic influenza-including a risk assessment of H5N1. Rev. Sci. Tech. 28: 187-202.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  10. Cui J, Qu N, Guo Y, Cao L, Wu S, Mei K, et al. 2017. Phylogeny, pathogenicity, and transmission of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in chickens. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 7: 328.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  11. Jang Y, Seo SH. 2022. H5 cleavage-site peptide vaccine protects chickens from lethal infection by highly pathogenic H5 avian influenza viruses. Arch. Virol. 167: 67-75.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Liang WS, He YC, Wu HD, Li YT, Shih TH, Kao GS, et al. 2020. Ecological factors associated with persistent circulation of multiple highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses among poultry farms in Taiwan during 2015-17. PLoS One 15: e0236581.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  13. Spackman E, Prosser DJ, Pantin-Jackwood M, Stephens CB, Berlin AM. 2019. Clade 2.3. 4.4 H5 north american highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses infect, but do not cause clinical signs in, American Black Ducks (Anas rubripes). Avian Dis. 63: 366-370.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Marchenko V, Goncharova N, Susloparov I, Kolosova N, Gudymo A, Svyatchenko S, et al. 2018. Isolation and characterization of H5Nx highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses of clade 2.3. 4.4 in Russia. Virology 525: 216-223.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Zhao K, Gu M, Zhong L, Duan Z, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, et al. 2013. Characterization of three H5N5 and one H5N8 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in China. Vet. Microbiol. 163: 351-357.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Lee YJ, Kang HM, Lee EK, Song BM, Jeong J, Kwon YK, et al. 2014. Novel reassortant influenza A (H5N8) viruses, South Korea, 2014. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20: 1087-1089.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  17. Pan M, Gao R, Lv Q, Huang S, Zhou Z, Yang L, et al. 2016. Human infection with a novel, highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N6) virus: virological and clinical findings. J. Infect. 72: 52-59.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Lee JH, Pascua PNQ, Song MS, Baek YH, Kim CJ, Choi HW, et al. 2009. Isolation and genetic characterization of H5N2 influenza viruses from pigs in Korea. J. Virol. 83: 4205-4215.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  19. Choi WS, Baek YH, Kwon JJ, Jeong JH, Park SJ, Kim YI, et al. 2017. Rapid acquisition of polymorphic virulence markers during adaptation of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N8 virus in the mouse. Sci. Rep. 7: 40667.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  20. Lee DH, Song CS. 2013. H9N2 avian influenza virus in Korea: evolution and vaccination. Clin. Exper. Vaccine Res. 2: 26-33.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  21. Bridges CB, Katz JM, Seto WH, Chan PK, Tsang D, Ho W, et al. 2000. Risk of influenza A (H5N1) infection among health care workers exposed to patients with influenza A (H5N1), Hong Kong. J. Infect. Dis. 181: 344-348.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Ungchusak K, Auewarakul P, Dowell SF, Kitphati R, Auwanit W, Puthavathana P, et al. 2005. Probable person-to-person transmission of avian influenza A (H5N1). New England J. Med. 352: 333-340.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Webster RG, Govorkova EA. 2006. H5N1 influenza-continuing evolution and spread. New Eng. J. Med. 355: 2174-2177.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Denney L, Ho L-P. 2018. The role of respiratory epithelium in host defence against influenza virus infection. Biomed. J. 41: 218-233.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  25. Brokstad KA, Eriksson J-C, Cox RJ, Tynning T, Olofsson J, Jonsson R, et al. 2002. Parenteral vaccination against influenza does not induce a local antigen-specific immune response in the nasal mucosa. J. Infect. Dis. 185: 878-884.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Liu H, Patil HP, de Vries-Idema J, Wilschut J, Huckriede A. 2013. Evaluation of mucosal and systemic immune responses elicited by GPI-0100-adjuvanted influenza vaccine delivered by different immunization strategies. PLoS One 8: e69649.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  27. Kim L, Martinez CJ, Hodgson KA, Trager GR, Brandl JR, Sandefer EP, et al. 2016. Systemic and mucosal immune responses following oral adenoviral delivery of influenza vaccine to the human intestine by radio controlled capsule. Sci. Rep. 6: 37295.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  28. Baker JR Jr, Farazuddin M, Wong PT, O'Konek JJ. 2022. The unfulfilled potential of mucosal immunization. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 150: 1-11.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  29. Calzas C, Chevalier C. 2019. Innovative mucosal vaccine formulations against influenza A virus infections. Front. Immunol. 10: 1605.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  30. Kikuchi Y, Kunitoh-Asari A, Hayakawa K, Imai S, Kasuya K, Abe K, et al. 2014. Oral administration of Lactobacillus plantarum strain AYA enhances IgA secretion and provides survival protection against influenza virus infection in mice. PLoS One 9: e86416.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  31. Lee YN, Youn HN, Kwon JH, Lee DH, Park JK, Yuk SS, et al. 2013. Sublingual administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus affects respiratory immune responses and facilitates protection against influenza virus infection in mice. Antiviral Res. 98: 284-290.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Wang Z, Yu Q, Fu J, Liang J, Yang Q. 2013. Immune responses of chickens inoculated with recombinant L actobacillus expressing the haemagglutinin of the avian influenza virus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 115: 1269-1277.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Poo H, Pyo HM, Lee TY, Yoon SW, Lee JS, Kim CJ, et al. 2006. Oral administration of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 displayed on Lactobacillus casei induces E7‐specific antitumor effects in C57/BL6 mice. Int. J. Cancer 119: 1702-1709.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. Lee JS, Poo H, Han DP, Hong SP, Kim K, Cho MW, et al. 2006. Mucosal immunization with surface-displayed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein on Lactobacillus casei induces neutralizing antibodies in mice. J. Virol. 80: 4079-4087.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  35. Li R, Chowdhury MY, Kim JH, Kim TH, Pathinayake P, Koo WS, et al. 2015. Mucosally administered Lactobacillus surface-displayed influenza antigens (sM2 and HA2) with cholera toxin subunit A1 (CTA1) Induce broadly protective immune responses against divergent influenza subtypes. Vet. Microbiol. 179: 250-263.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Chowdhury MY, Li R, Kim JH, Park ME, Kim TH, Pathinayake P, et al. 2014. Mucosal vaccination with recombinant Lactobacillus casei-displayed CTA1-conjugated consensus matrix protein-2 (sM2) induces broad protection against divergent influenza subtypes in BALB/c mice. PLoS One 9: e94051.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  37. Zhang N, Zheng BJ, Lu L, Zhou Y, Jiang S, Du L. 2015. Advancements in the development of subunit influenza vaccines. Microb. Infect. 17: 123-134.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  38. Khurana S, Verma S, Verma N, Crevar CJ, Carter DM, Manischewitz J, et al. 2011. Bacterial HA1 vaccine against pandemic H5N1 influenza virus: evidence of oligomerization, hemagglutination, and cross-protective immunity in ferrets. J. Virol. 85: 1246-1256.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  39. Du L, Zhao G, Sun S, Zhang X, Zhou X, Guo Y, et al. 2013. A critical HA1 neutralizing domain of H5N1 influenza in an optimal conformation induces strong cross-protection. PLoS One 8: e53568.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  40. Palomino MM, Allievi MC, Prado-Acosta M, Sanchez-Rivas C, Ruzal SM. 2010. New method for electroporation of Lactobacillus species grown in high salt. J. Microbiol. Methods 83: 164-167.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Velumani S, Ho HT, He F, Musthaq S, Prabakaran M, Kwang J. 2011. A novel peptide ELISA for universal detection of antibodies to human H5N1 influenza viruses. PLoS One 6: e20737.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  42. Reed LJ, Muench H. 1938. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am. J. Epidemiol. 27: 493-497.
    CrossRef
  43. Gross FL, Bai Y, Jefferson S, Holiday C, Levine MZ. 2017. Measuring influenza neutralizing antibody responses to A (H3N2) viruses in human sera by microneutralization assays using MDCK-SIAT1 cells. J. Vis. Exp. 129: 56448.
    CrossRef
  44. van Riet E, Ainai A, Suzuki T, Hasegawa H. 2012. Mucosal IgA responses in influenza virus infections; thoughts for vaccine design. Vaccine 30: 5893-5900.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  45. Putcharoen O, Wacharapluesadee S, Chia WN, Paitoonpong L, Tan CW, Suwanpimolkul G, et al. 2021. Early detection of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients in Thailand. PLoS One 16: e0246864.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  46. Lopez CE, Legge KL. 2020. Influenza A virus vaccination: immunity, protection, and recent advances toward a universal vaccine. Vaccines 8: 434.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  47. Fukuyama Y, Tokuhara D, Kataoka K, Gilbert RS, McGhee JR, Yuki Y, et al. 2012. Novel vaccine development strategies for inducing mucosal immunity. Expe. Rev. Vaccines 11: 367-379.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  48. Muñoz-Provencio D, Llopis M, Antolín M, De Torres I, Guarner F, Pérez-Martínez G, et al. 2009. Adhesion properties of Lactobacillus casei strains to resected intestinal fragments and components of the extracellular matrix. Arch. Microbiol. 191: 153-161.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  49. Christensen HR, Frøkiær H, Pestka JJ. 2002. Lactobacilli differentially modulate expression of cytokines and maturation surface markers in murine dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 168: 171-178.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. D'Arienzo R, Maurano F, Luongo D, Mazzarella G, Stefanile R, Troncone R, et al. 2008. Adjuvant effect of Lactobacillus casei in a mouse model of gluten sensitivity. Immunol. Lett. 119: 78-83.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. Mohamadzadeh M, Olson S, Kalina WV, Ruthel G, Demmin GL, Warfield KL, et al. 2005. Lactobacilli activate human dendritic cells that skew T cells toward T helper 1 polarization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102: 2880-2885.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  52. Pouwels PH, Leer RJ, Shaw M, den Bak-Glashouwer M-JH, Tielen FD, Smit E, et al. 1998. Lactic acid bacteria as antigen delivery vehicles for oral immunization purposes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 41: 155-167.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  53. Lee SY, Choi JH, Xu Z. 2003. Microbial cell-surface display. Trends Biotechnol. 21: 45-52.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  54. Russell CJ, Hu M, Okda FA. 2018. Influenza hemagglutinin protein stability, activation, and pandemic risk. Trends Microbiol. 26: 841-853.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  55. Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. 2000. Receptor binding and membrane fusion in virus entry: the influenza hemagglutinin. Ann. Rev. Biochemy. 69: 531-569.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  56. Wiley DC, Skehel JJ. 1987. The structure and function of the hemagglutinin membrane glycoprotein of influenza virus. Annu. Rev. Biochemy. 56: 365-394.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  57. Gerhard W, Yewdell J, Frankel ME, Webster R. 1981. Antigenic structure of influenza virus haemagglutinin defined by hybridoma antibodies. Nature 290: 713-717.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  58. Zhang Y, Yang L, Zhang J, Huang K, Sun X, Yang Y, et al. 2022. Oral or intranasal immunization with recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum displaying head domain of Swine Influenza A virus hemagglutinin protects mice from H1N1 virus. Microb. Cell. Fact. 21: 185.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  59. Lei H, Sheng Z, Ding Q, Chen J, Wei X, Lam DM-K, et al. 2011. Evaluation of oral immunization with recombinant avian influenza virus HA1 displayed on the Lactococcus lactis surface and combined with the mucosal adjuvant cholera toxin subunit B. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 18: 1046-1051.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  60. Rosenbaum P, Tchitchek N, Joly C, Rodriguez Pozo A, Stimmer L, Langlois S, et al. 2021. Vaccine inoculation route modulates early immunity and consequently antigen-specific immune response. Front. Immunol. 12: 645210.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  61. Wang Z, Yu Q, Gao J, Yang Q. 2012. Mucosal and systemic immune responses induced by recombinant Lactobacillus spp. expressing the hemagglutinin of the avian influenza virus H5N1. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 19: 174-179.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  62. Vissers YM, Snel J, Zuurendonk PF, Smit BA, Wichers HJ, Savelkoul HF. 2010. Differential effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus plantarum strains on cytokine induction in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 59: 60-70.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  63. Wiley JA, Tighe MP, Harmsen AG. 2005. Upper respiratory tract resistance to influenza infection is not prevented by the absence of either nasal-associated lymphoid tissue or cervical lymph nodes. J. Immunol. 175: 3186-3196.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  64. de Pinho Favaro MT, Atienza-Garriga J, Martínez-Torró C, Parladé E, Vázquez E, Corchero JL, et al. 2022. Recombinant vaccines in 2022: a perspective from the cell factory. Microb. Cell Fact. 21: 1-17.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  65. Singh SK, Roeffen W, Mistarz UH, Chourasia BK, Yang F, Rand KD, et al. 2017. Construct design, production, and characterization of Plasmodium falciparum 48/45 R0. 6C subunit protein produced in Lactococcus lactis as candidate vaccine. Microb. Cell Fact. 16: 1-11.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  66. LeCureux JS, Dean GA. 2018. Lactobacillus mucosal vaccine vectors: immune responses against bacterial and viral antigens. Msphere. 3: 10.1128/msphere.00061-00018.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  67. Shirdast H, Ebrahimzadeh F, Taromchi AH, Mortazavi Y, Esmaeilzadeh A, Sekhavati MH, et al. 2021. Recombinant Lactococcus lactis dsplaying Omp31 antigen of Brucella melitensis can induce an immunogenic response in BALB/c Mice. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 13: 80-89.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  68. Detmer A, Glenting J. 2006. Live bacterial vaccines-a review and identification of potential hazards. Microb. Cell Fact. 5: 1-12.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef

Related articles in JMB

More Related Articles

Article

Research article

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024; 34(3): 735-745

Published online March 28, 2024 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2307.07040

Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Mucosal Administration of Lactobacillus casei Surface-Displayed HA1 Induces Protective Immune Responses against Avian Influenza A Virus in Mice

Dung T. Huynh, W.A. Gayan Chathuranga, Kiramage Chathuranga, Jong-Soo Lee*, and Chul-Joong Kim*

College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34314, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to:Jong-Soo Lee,          jongsool@cnu.ac.kr
Chul-Joong Kim,       cjkim@cnu.ac.kr

These authors contributed equally to the study

Received: July 28, 2023; Revised: October 12, 2023; Accepted: October 18, 2023

Abstract

Avian influenza is a serious threat to both public health and the poultry industry worldwide. This respiratory virus can be combated by eliciting robust immune responses at the site of infection through mucosal immunization. Recombinant probiotics, specifically lactic acid bacteria, are safe and effective carriers for mucosal vaccines. In this study, we engineered recombinant fusion protein by fusing the hemagglutinin 1 (HA1) subunit of the A/Aquatic bird/Korea/W81/2005 (H5N2) with the Bacillus subtilis poly γ-glutamic acid synthetase A (pgsA) at the surface of Lactobacillus casei (pgsA-HA1/L. casei). Using subcellular fractionation and flow cytometry we confirmed the surface localization of this fusion protein. Mucosal administration of pgsA-HA1/L. casei in mice resulted in significant levels of HA1-specific serum IgG, mucosal IgA and neutralizing antibodies against the H5N2 virus. Additionally, pgsA-HA1/L. casei-induced systemic and local cell-mediated immune responses specific to HA1, as evidenced by an increased number of IFN-γ and IL-4 secreting cells in the spleens and higher levels of IL-4 in the local lymphocyte supernatants. Finally, mice inoculated with pgsA-HA1/L. casei were protected against a 10LD50 dose of the homologous mouse-adapted H5N2 virus. These results suggest that mucosal immunization with L. casei displaying HA1 on its surface could be a potential strategy for developing a mucosal vaccine against other H5 subtype viruses.

Keywords: Avian influenza, HA1, Lactobacillus casei, poly &gamma,-glutamic acid synthetase A, surface display, mucosal delivery

Introduction

Avian influenza (AI), caused by AI viruses (AIVs) from Orthomyxoviridae family [1], is a highly contagious respiratory disease in poultry [2]. Based on their pathogenicity, AIVs are classified into two groups highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAIVs) and low pathogenic avian influenza viruses (LPAIVs). HPAIVs pose a greater threat to poultry [3]. LPAIVs can mutate into HPAIVs, increasing the risk of outbreaks [4-6]. Additionally, there is an increase in the number of direct transmission cases of AIVs from birds to humans, which could lead to sudden epidemics [7, 8].

HPAIVs of the H5 subtype, derived from the A/Goose/Guangdong/1/1996 (H5N1) lineage, known as H5Nx viruses, have become a growing concern due to their increasing prevalence and their potential to cause human infections [9]. These viruses have evolved into ten genetic clades [10]. Among the ten clades, clade-2 viruses are successively dominant and endemic in many countries [11]. Outbreaks of H5N5 and H5N2 HPAIVs have been reported in Asia, Europe, and North America since 2008 [12-15]. In addition, H5N8 viruses from clade 2.3.4.4 were primarily reported in Korea in early 2014 and spread globally in many countries [16]. In 2014, a novel H5N6 reassortant-caused human infection was first reported in China [17]. The recurrence of H5N2 LPAIV raises concerns about the exchange of genetic characteristics between divergent isolates [18-20]. Although H5Nx viruses are currently unable to efficiently transmit among humans [21, 22], their continued evolution and lack of population-level immunity make them a potential pandemic threat [23]. Therefore, the development of an effective H5 subtype AI vaccine is urgently needed.

The respiratory tract mucosa serves as the site of entry and replication of the AI virus as well as the front line of defense against infections [24]. However, current parenteral AI vaccine modalities generally fail to induce local immune responses [25, 26], which is why mucosally administered vaccines are more effective [27]. These mucosal vaccines can elicit both local and systemic immunity but, local barriers remain a bottleneck of antigen uptake by microfold cells and professional antigen-presenting cells [28]. To overcome this issue, it is necessary to investigate safer and more efficient mucosal vaccine carriers for clinical use [29]. Lactobacillus species is an attractive delivery platform for mucosal vaccines due to their inherent safety and intrinsic adjuvant properties. Many studies have shown that mucosally administered Lactobacillus triggered local IgA and systemic immune responses, including T and NK cell activity by activating internalization and maturation of antigen-presenting cells in draining lymph nodes and spleen [30-32].

In previous studies, we successfully engineered the Bacillus subtilis transmembrane protein poly-γ-glutamate synthetase A (pgsA) to present multiple heterologous antigens at the surface of L. casei [33-36]. We also demonstrated that L. casei surface-displayed universal vaccine candidate sM2HA2, a fusion protein of conserved matrix protein 2 (sM2) and the stalk domain of hemagglutinin 2 (HA2), induced strong sM2HA2-specific humoral and cellular immune responses following mucosal immunization [35, 36]. However, we observed that this approach did not provide complete protection in mice infected with H5 subtype viruses. To address this issue, we targeted the immunodominant hemagglutinin 1 (HA1) subunit that constitutes the membrane-distal globular domain of HA, which contains the sialic acid receptor-binding site and most of the determinants recognized by virus-neutralizing antibodies [37]. Immunization with recombinant H5N1-derived HA1 provided effective protection against heterologous influenza virus strains [38, 39]. Thus, incorporating HA1 as a vaccine target in our mucosal vaccine platform could potentially enhance protection against H5 subtype influenza viruses.

In this study, we selected the HA1 domain (residues 17 to 330) of A/aquatic bird/Korea/W81/2005(H5N2) as a representative immunogen for AI H5 subtypes and investigated the immunogenicity of HA1 which was displayed on the surface of L. casei (pgsA-HA1/L. casei) in the BALB/c mouse model. The results showed that oral and intranasal immunization of mice with pgsA-HA1/L. casei elicited protective immune responses against the homologous mouse-adapted H5N2 virus. The results suggest that recombinant L. casei can serve as a promising delivery platform for the development of mucosal vaccines against AI viruses and other pathogens.

Materials and Methods

pgsA-HA1/L. casei Construction and Expression

The plasmid encoding the H5N2/HA sequence was kindly provided by Dr. Young-Ki Choi (Chungbuk National University, South Korea). The plasmid pKV-Pald-PgsA, harboring the pgsA genes of Bacillus subtilis, was used to construct the surface display plasmid, which was a kind gift from the Bioleaders Corporation (South Korea). HA1 fragment spanning residues 17 to 330 was amplified by PCR using 5’-GGATCCGACCAAATTTGCATTGG-3’-forward primer and 5’-GTCGACTTACCCAAATAGTCCTCTTG-3’-reverse primer with the H5N2/HA plasmid as a template. The insert was then digested by BamHI/SalI restriction enzymes (Takara, South Korea) and cloned into the linear expression vector pKV-Pald-pgsA to yield pKV-Pald-pgsA-HA1. The plasmid was subsequently verified by DNA sequencing (Bionics, South Korea).

The plasmids pKV-Pald-pgsA (empty plasmid) and pKV-Pald-pgsA-HA1 were introduced into Lactobacillus casei L525 cells by electroporation for expression (so-called pgsA/L. casei and pgsA-HA1/L. casei, respectively) following a previously described protocol [40], In brief, 1 ml pre-culture of L. casei L525 was inoculated into 50 ml of MRS media (BD Biosciences, USA) and grown without aeration at 30°C until the culture reached an optical density at 600 nm up to 2-2.5. Subsequently, the growth was halted by cooling the culture on ice for 15 min, and the cells were harvested by centrifugation (6000 × g, 2 min, 4°C). The cell pellet was washed three times with ice-cold ultra-pure water, the final cell pellet was suspended in 1 ml of ice-cold ultra-pure water. Next plasmid DNA (250 ng/transformation) was combined with 100 μl cell suspension, transferred to a sterile prechilled electroporation cuvette (with a 2 mm gap), and subjected to electroporation under the following conditions: voltage of 2000V, parallel resistance of 400 Ω, capacitance of 25 μF, field strength of 10 kV/cm), and time constant of 5 ms using the Gene Pulser Xcell electroporation system (BioRad, USA). In accordance with a previous protocol [35], pgsA/L. casei and pgsA-HA1/L. casei cells were fractionated after being cultured for 48 h at 30°C in MRS broth with erythromycin (16 μg/ml) (Merck, Germany). Subsequently, immunoblotting analysis was performed using rabbit anti-pgsA (1:3000) and mouse anti-H5N2 (1:1000) polyclonal antibodies (home-grown) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated rabbit or mouse anti-IgG (1:3000) (Cell Signaling Technology, USA). The WEST-ZOL plus immunoblotting blotting detection system (iNtRON Biotechnology, South Korea) was used for visualization of immunoblotting with enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection system (ECL-GE Healthcare, United Kingdom).

To perform fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), recombinant L. casei containing pgsA, pgsA-HA1 were harvested and incubated overnight with mouse anti-H5N2 (1:1000). Subsequently, the cells were incubated with Cy3-conjugated donkey mouse anti-IgG antibody (Jackson immunoresearch Inc, Pennsylvania, USA) for 2 h at room temperature (RT). Finally, a total of 1 × 105 cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (Becton Dickinson, USA).

Mouse Experimental Schedule, Sample Collection, and Virus Challenge

Specific pathogen-free female BALB/c mice (6-week age) were purchased from Samtako (South Korea) and maintained in a ventilated milieu with ad libitum access to water and food. The room was maintained at a temperature of 18-23°C, relative humidity of 50-60%, and a 12 h light/dark cycle. All mice were allowed to acclimate for 7 days before the start of the experiment. All experiments were conducted under appropriate conditions with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chungnam National University (approval number CNU-00432). In all intranasal immunization and challenge experiments, mice were anesthetized with intraperitoneal administration of avertin (2.5%) at a dosage of 0.015 ml/g bodyweight.

The study consisted of two sets of mice, one for oral and one for intranasal immunization. Each set was divided into three experimental groups, consisting of 19 mice (eight for characterization of humoral and cellular immune responses, five for survival analysis and six for lung virus titers at 3 and 5 days post-challenge (dpc). The mice were immunized with pgsA-HA1/L. casei at a dose of 1010 colony forming unit (CFU) in 100 μl of PBS via oral gavage on days 0-2, 7-9 and 21-23 or at a dose of 109 CFU in 20 μl of PBS via pipette drop to the nostrils of anesthetized mice on days 0-2, 7-9 and 21. The control mice in the oral and intranasal groups were administered the same dosage of L. casei harboring pgsA/L. casei or same volume of PBS. Blood and feces samples were collected on days -1 and 14, and 28, and the lungs and small intestines were collected on day 28. The sera were separated from whole blood by centrifugation (12,000 ×g, 5 min, 4°C). Feces, lungs and intestines were homogenized in PBS containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and the supernatants were collected by centrifugation (12,000 ×g, 15 min, and 4°C).

Spleens, cervical lymph nodes, mesenteric LNs and Peyer’s patches LNs were aseptically collected on day 28 and stored in RPMI media (PAN Biotech, Germany). All tissue samples were separated through a 70 μm cell strainer filter (SPL Life science, South Korea), and lymphocytes from cervical, mesenteric and Peyer’s patches LNs were kept on ice. Splenocytes from the spleens were harvested after the lysis of red blood cells with ammonium-chloride-potassium buffer. The cells were then suspended in complete RPMI media containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) with 1% antimycotic and antibiotic (Gibco, USA). A synthetic peptide containing the conserved epitope of H5-subtype hemagglutinin (CNTKCQTPMGAINSS) [41] was synthesized by Peptron Inc. (South Korea). This synthetic peptide was used for in vitro re-stimulation assays at a concentration of 5 μg/well.

To assess the protective efficacy of the pgsA-HA1/L. casei vaccine, mice were challenged with a 10LD50 of the mouse-adapted A/Aquatic bird/Korea/W81/2005(H5N2) virus via intranasal inoculation in 20 μl of PBS. Virus titer in the lungs was determined by sacrificing six mice from each group on 3 and 5 dpc. The remaining five mice from each group were monitored daily for weight loss and survival for a total of 12 days. Mice that lost 25% of their body weight were considered to have reached the humane endpoint and were euthanized using CO2 inhalation. Efforts were made to minimize suffering and all surviving mice were humanely euthanized after final monitoring.

ELISA

Antibodies specific to HA1 were determined using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). To coat the 96-well immunosorbent plates (Corning, USA), the above synthetic peptide (500 ng/well) was added and allowed to incubate overnight at 4°C. Following, 2 h of blocking at RT with 10% skim. Serum (1:50) or supernatants of homogenized tissues or feces (1:200) were added to the plates and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. The plates were then incubated with secondary HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG, -IgG1, IgG2a, -IgA antibodies (diluted 1:3000; Sigma, USA) for 2 h at 37°C. The plates were then incubated in the dark for 10 min with a mixed substrate solution of 3,3’,5,5’-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) and H2O2. Finally, the reaction was stopped by adding 2N-H2SO4, and optical density values at 450 nm wavelength were measured with an Apollo ELISA Reader (Berthold technologies, Germany).

Sandwich ELISA was used to evaluate the levels of antigen-specific interleukin-4 (IL-4) secretion in the local LNs. For the in vitro stimulation assay, 1 × 106 lymphocytes from cervical, mesenteric and Peyer’s patches LNs were incubated with the above synthetic peptide in complete RPMI media at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 72 h. The culture supernatants were collected, centrifuged and stored at -20°C for further analysis. The production of IL-4 was measured using a cytokine ELISA kit (BD Biosciences, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions.

ELISPOT

The HA1specific cellular immune responses were evaluated by using an ELISPOT assay with the mouse IFN-γ ELISPOT set and mouse IL-4 ELISPOT set according to the manufacturers’ specifications (BD Bioscience, USA). First, 96-well ELISPOT plates were coated with anti-mouse IFN-γ or anti-IL-4 capture antibodies (5 μg/ml) in PBS and incubated at 4°C overnight. Then plates were blocked for 2 h at RT with 200 μl/well complete RPMI media. Next, 1 × 106 splenocytes were added to each well and incubated for 48 h at 37°C with 5% CO2 in complete RPMI media containing the above synthetic peptide (5 μg/well), complete RPMI media (negative control) or RPMI media with 5 μg/ml phytohaemagglutinin (positive control) (Invitrogen, USA). The cells were then discarded from the plates and treated with biotinylated anti-mouse IFN-γ and IL-4 antibodies, streptavidin HRP and AEC substrate solution. The substrate reaction was terminated by washing with deionized water. Finally, the spots were enumerated using the CTL-Immunospot S5 UV analyzer (Cellular Technologies, USA).

Lung Virus Titer

The lungs were aseptically collected to determine virus titers using 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) as previously described [35]. In brief, lung tissues were homogenized in sterilized PBS containing 1% antibiotic and antimycotic solution, followed by centrifugation (12,000 ×g, 15 min, and 4°C) to remove tissue debris. Ten-fold serial dilution of the samples was added to confluent MDCK cells and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 1h. The media was replaced with L-1-tosylamide-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK) trypsin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) containing serum-free media, the titers of each serially diluted sample were examined using a hemagglutination assay (HA) test. The lung virus titers were expressed as a TCID50 using the Reed-Muench method [42].

Serum Neutralization Test

The level of H5N2-specific neutralizing antibodies in sera was determined by conducting a serum neutralization test with modification to the protocol described previously [43]. In 96-well microliter plates, 50 μl of 2-fold serial dilution of receptor-destroying enzyme (Denka Seiken, Japan) was treated and then inactivated serum at 56°C for 30 min in FBS free DMEM was mixed with 50 μl of 100 TCID50 of Vero cell adapted H5N2 virus. This mixture was then incubated at 37°C for 1h, 5 × 103/100 μl of Vero cells were added to each well, and the plates were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 4 days. The virus-induced cytopathic effect was examined and the reciprocal of the highest serum dilution at which cytopathic effect could be observed was used to determine the neutralizing antibody titers.

Statistical Analysis

The results are reported as the mean values with standard deviations (S.D.). Discrepancies between groups were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test. Survival rates were compared using the log-rank test, using GraphPad Prism 6 software. The threshold for statistically significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Construction, Expression and Surface Localization of pgsA-HA1

Initially, we constructed a pKV-Pald-pgsA-HA1 plasmid containing a fusion gene of pgsA-HA1 (Fig. 1A). L. casei cells were then electroporated for expression of pgsA or pgsA-HA1 recombinant antigens. The subcellular fractionation was conducted to verify the proper localization of recombinant HA1 on the membranes of L. casei. Differential centrifugation was used to separate cytoplasmic and cell membrane fractions and fractions were analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-pgsA and anti-H5N2 antibodies. Virtually no pgsA or pgsA-HA1 was detected in the negative control sample (Fig. 1B, lane 1). As expected, pgsA-HA1 fusion protein was detected at the expected molecular weight of approximately 79 kDa. Both recombinant pgsA and pgsA-HA1 were confirmed in whole-cell lysates and cell membrane fractions but not in the cytoplasmic fractions (Fig. 1B lanes 2 and 3). However, some lower molecular weight bands were observed in the whole-cell lysates and cell membrane fractions of the pgsA-HA1/L. casei, which may have resulted from degradation.

Figure 1. Antigen construction and expression. (A) Schematic depiction of the pKV-Pald-pgsA-HA1 plasmid. (B) The immunoblotting of the fractionated recombinant L. casei, pgsA/L. casei and pgsA-HA1/L. casei using anti-pgsA and anti-H5N2 polyclonal antibodies. Lanes 1, 2, and 3 illustrated L. casei, pgsA/L. casei and pgsA-HA1/L. casei, respectively. (C) FACS analysis. The recombinant pgsA/L. casei and pgsA-HA1/L. casei cells were probed with mouse anti-H5N2 antibody, followed by Cy3-conjugated donkey mouse anti-IgG antibody.

Upon proper localization to the L. casei membranes, pgsA-HA1 fusion protein was expected to display at the cell surface. To confirm the surface accessibility of recombinant pgsA-HA1, L. casei cells were subjected to FACS analysis. The pgsA-HA1/L. casei reacted with mouse anti-H5N2 antiserum, followed by Cy3-conjugated mouse anti-IgG antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, USA). FACS analysis results demonstrated the successful surface exposure of pgsA-HA1 fusion protein (Fig. 1C). These findings confirmed that recombinant HA1 was successfully expressed and displayed at the cell surface of L. casei using pgsA as a membrane anchor protein.

Recombinant pgsA-HA1/L. casei Induced systemic and local humoral immune responses

To assess the humoral immune responses of pgsA-HA1/L. casei, mice were immunized through oral and intranasal routes as per a specific scheme (Fig. 2A). Two control groups (PBS and pgsA/L. casei) were used. Serum and fecal samples were collected on -1, 14, and 28 days and analyzed via ELISA. Serum collected on 14 days showed a relatively low absorbance level for IgG specific to HA1. However, on day 28, high levels of absorbance for IgG specific to HA1 were observed in the pgsA-HA1/L. casei immunized mice, in both orally (Fig. 2B, left panel) and intranasally (Fig. 2C, left panel) inoculated groups. Oral immunization with pgsA-HA1/L. casei induced significant levels of fecal IgA levels specific to HA1 (Fig. 2B, right panel), while no significant difference in fecal IgA antibodies was observed in all groups with intranasal immunization (Fig. 2C, right panel). IgA secreted from the mucosa is an essential indicator of the local immune response to natural infection and studies have shown that secretory IgA responses in mice were shown to be involved in heterosubtypic cross-protection [44]. Recombinant L. casei surface-expressing pgsA-HA1 evoked significantly increased levels of HA1-specific local IgA titers in the lungs and small intestines compared to the controls both orally (Fig. 2D) and intranasally (Fig. 2E) immunized groups. These data demonstrate that L. casei surface-displayed HA1 antigen effectively stimulated systemic IgG and local IgA antibodies.

Figure 2. Evaluation of the antigen-specific humoral immune responses induced by pgsA-HA1/L. casei. Mice were grouped as mentioned in materials and methods, then immunized at days 0 to 2, 7 to 9, and 21 to 23 orally and intranasally. Blood and feces samples were collected on days -1, 14, and 28. Lung and small intestine samples were collected on day 28 after immunization. Induction of HA1-specific humoral immune responses by mucosal immunization of pgsA-HA1/L. casei were determined by indirect ELISA and virus neutralization assay. (A) Schematic depiction of mouse experiment strategy. (B) HA1- specific serum IgG titers (left panel) and fecal IgA titers (right panel) in the orally immunized groups. (C) Similarly, in the intranasally immunized groups, HA1-specific serum IgG titers (left panel) and fecal IgA titers (right panel). (D) HA1-specific IgA titers in the lungs (left panel) and the small intestines (right panel) in the orally immunized groups. (E) Similarly, HA1- specific IgA titers in the lungs (left panel) and the small intestines (right panel) in the intranasally immunized groups. (F) HA1- specific IgG1 and IgG2a titers in the orally immunized groups. (G) Reciprocals of virus-neutralizing antibody titers specific to the H5N2 virus in the orally immunized groups. (H) HA1-specific IgG1 and IgG2a titers in the intranasally immunized groups. (I) Reciprocals of virus-neutralizing antibody titers specific to the H5N2 virus in the intranasally immunized groups. The bars denote the means ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test., *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

To further analyze the antigen-specific systemic humoral immune responses induced by pgsA-HA1/L. casei after mucosal immunization, the pattern of IgG-isotypes was examined using ELISA. Oral (Fig. 2F) and intranasal (Fig. 2G), administration of recombinant pgsA-HA1/L. casei induced significantly high levels of HA1-specific IgG1 and IgG2a compared to the control groups. These results indicated that pgsA-HA1/L. casei induced mixed Th1/Th2-CD4+ immune responses, which promotes IgG class-switching and secretion of IgA as observed earlier.

pgsA-HA1/L. casei Enhanced H5N2 Specific Virus-Neutralizing Antibodies

Virus-neutralizing activity is a direct and sensitive measure for functional antibodies [45]. To examine whether the pgsA-HA1/L. casei can induce anti-H5N2 specific neutralizing antibodies, serum neutralization assay was performed in the Vero cells. The neutralizing antibodies were determined as the highest serum dilution that inhibited the cytopathic effect in Vero cells. Both oral and intranasal immunization with pgsA-HA1/L. casei induced significantly higher titers of H5N2 neutralizing antibodies than those inoculated with pgsA/L. casei or PBS groups (Fig. 2H and 2I). Notably intranasal immunization using pgsA-HA1/L. casei appeared relatively higher titers of neutralizing antibodies compared to oral immunization (Fig. 2H and 2I), indicating the benefits of intranasal administration in inducing systemic humoral responses.

pgsA-HA1/L. casei Induces Potential HA1-Specific Cellular Immune Response

In addition to humoral immune responses, cellular immune responses are also important for influenza clearing [46]. In this study, mice were immunized through oral and intranasal routes per the specific scheme (Fig. 3A). To evaluate potential antigen-specific T cell responses, in vitro lymphocyte restimulation assays were conducted using cells from cervical, mesenteric and Peyer’s patches LNs on day 28 after immunization. The mesenteric and Peyer’s patches LN cells were isolated from the mice orally inoculated with pgsA-HA1/L. casei showed significantly higher IL-4 production than the control groups (Fig. 3B). In mice intranasally immunized with pgsA-HA1/L. casei dramatic increases in local IL-4 levels were observed in cervical and mesenteric LN cells (Fig. 3C).

Figure 3. Evaluation of potential antigen-specific cellular immune responses induced by pgsA-HA1/L. casei. Mice were grouped as mentioned in materials and methods, then immunized at days 0 to 2, 7 to 9, and 21 to 23 orally and intranasally. Local LNs and spleen lymphocytes were collected on day 28 after immunization. Induction of potential HA1- specific cellular immune responses by mucosal immunization of pgsA-HA1/L. casei was determined by cytokine ELISA and ELISPOT assays. (A) Schematic depiction of mouse experiment strategy. (B) HA1-protein specific interleukin-4 (IL-4) production by mesenteric and Peyer’s patches LN lymphocytes (1 × 106 cells) in the orally immunized groups by ELISA. (C) HA1-specific interleukin-4 (IL-4) production by cervical and mesenteric LN lymphocytes (1 × 106 cells) in the intranasally immunized groups by ELISA. (D) and (E) HA1-specific IL-4 spots forming splenic lymphocytes (1 × 106 cells) in the orally and intranasally immunized groups by ELISPOT, respectively. (F) and (G) HA1- specific interferon-γ (IFN-γ) spots forming splenic lymphocytes (1 × 106 cells) in the orally and intranasally immunized groups by ELISPOT, respectively. PHA: Phytohaemagglutinin. The bars denote the means ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test., *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

Furthermore, cellular immune responses to pgsA-HA1/L. casei were confirmed by measuring both IL-4 and IFN-γ secretion levels from splenocytes using the ELISPOT assay on day 28 after immunization. Splenic lymphocytes isolated from mice immunized with pgsA-HA1/L. casei through both oral and intranasal routes showed significantly higher levels of systemic IL-4 (Fig. 4D and 4E) and IFN-γ (Fig. 4F and 4G) production than mice administered pgsA/L. casei or PBS. Taken together, these data suggest that pgsA-HA1/L. casei effectively induced local and systemic Th1/Th2 cytokine profiles and also confirmed mixed Th1/Th2-dependent cellular and humoral immune responses as observed above (Fig. 2F and 2G).

Figure 4. Protective efficacy of the pgsA-HA1/L. casei against lethal H5N2 infection. Mice were grouped as mentioned in materials and methods, then immunized at days 0 to 2, 7 to 9, and 21 to 23 orally and intranasally. Mice were intranasally challenged with 10LD50 of mouse-adapted A/Aquatic bird/Korea/W81/2005 (H5N2). After the challenge, changes in body weight and proportion of survival were monitored for 12 days. Lungs were aseptically collected on days 3 and 5 postchallenge; virus titers in the lung tissues were investigated by TCID50 in MDCK cells following the infection with H5N2. (A) Schematic depiction of mouse experiment strategy. (B) and (C) Changes in body weight and (D) and (E) survival rates of orally and intranasally immunized groups, respectively. (F) and (G) Virus titers in the lung tissues in orally and intranasally immunized groups, respectively. The bars denote the means ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test., **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

Mucosal Immunization of pgsA-HA1/L. casei Showed Protection against Lethal H5N2 Virus Challenge

Given that pgsA-HA1/L. casei was able to induce significant humoral and potential cellular immune responses, we sought to determine whether mucosal immunization with this vaccine would confer protection against lethal homologous H5N2 virus infection. To test the efficacy of the mucosal vaccine, we challenged immunized mice intranasally with a 10LD50 dose of mouse-adapted A/Aquatic bird/Korea/W81/2005(H5N2) and monitored changes in body weight and percentage survival for 12 days (Fig. 4A). The mice were orally immunized with pgsA-HA1/L. casei showed a 15% reduction in body weight, whereas the intranasally immunized mice showed a 7%reduction at 7 dpc. Both intranasally and orally immunized mice initiated recovery at 7 and 9 dpc, respectively, and completely recovered at 12 dpc (Fig. 4B and 4C). Both oral and intranasal inoculations with the pgsA-HA1/L. casei triggered 100% protection against the lethal challenge of the H5N2 virus, whereas all control group mice lost a significant magnitude of body weight and died by 8 to 9 dpc (Fig. 4D and 4E). However, the findings also indicated that intranasal immunization of pgsA-HA1/L. casei evoked more potent protection against the H5N2 virus infection.

Immunization with pgsA-HA1/L. casei Reduced Lung Virus Titers after H5N2 Challenge

Viral load in the lungs after infection is a reliable indicator of vaccine protection efficacy. The viral load in the lungs was quantified using the TCID50 method. pgsA-L. casei and PBS vaccine group had higher lung virus titers compared to the pgsA-HA1/L. casei vaccinated group. Notably, the pgsA-HA1/L. casei orally inoculated group showed a significant decrease in lung virus titers in comparison to the control group (Fig. 4F). However, this reduction was lower than that observed in the respective intranasally immunized group (Fig. 4G). These data demonstrate that pgsA-HA1/L. casei is capable of inducing robust protective immune responses that are potent enough to block virus replication in vivo.

Discussion

Mucosal immunity plays a significant role in defense against influenza virus infections, and the induction of effective mucosal immune response is the primary objective of vaccination. However, mucosal barriers typically respond to exogenous antigens with tolerance instead of immune activation, making it difficult to elicit local immune responses through immunization. Consequently, significant efforts have focused on developing potential adjuvants and vaccine delivery vectors for mucosal application in order to overcome these challenges [47].

Recombinant lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are increasingly being used as a potential carrier for mucosal vaccine delivery due to their ability to adhere to mucosa surface [5, 36, 48], intrinsic immunomodulatory properties [49-52], and feasibility in displaying heterologous antigens on the surface [33, 34, 36]. The display of heterologous antigens on the bacterial surface is usually achieved by genetic fusion with a bacterial transmembrane anchoring protein [53]. In this study, we explored the potency of recombinant L. casei as a surface-expression system and delivery vector for a mucosal vaccine against AIVs. Specifically, we replaced the domain (residues 26 to 42) that protrudes from the core helix structure of the Bacillus subtilis pgsA protein with H5N2-derived HA1 antigen through a translational fusion. Subcellular fractionation and flow cytometry analyses confirmed the successful expression and display of the HA1 antigen at the L. casei cell surface (Fig. 1B and 1C), making it a promising mucosal vaccine candidate

HA is a classical type I membrane glycoprotein that plays key roles in viral adsorption and membrane fusion. This protein stimulates the production of functional antibodies and is the primary antigen in many preclinical studies [54]. During virus replication, the HA protein is initially translated as a single polypeptide precursor (HA0), which is later cleaved by host trypsin-like proteases into two subunits, HA1 and HA2 [55]. The HA1 subunit forms a membrane-distal globular head that contains the receptor-binding domain (RBD), and most of the antigenic regions are recognized by neutralizing antibodies [56, 57]. In this study, we proved that oral or intranasal administration of recombinant pgsA-HA1/L. casei in mice induced significant HA1-specific neutralizing antibodies against the H5N2 strain (Fig. 2E and 2I), elicited potential cellular immune responses in both local and systemic compartments (Fig. 3) and provided sufficient protection against the mouse-adapted H5N2 virus challenge (Fig. 4). Also, our results are in line with the previous studies in which L. lactis and L. plantarum surface-displayed HA1 antigens conferred the potential protection of mice against the lethal H5N1 and H1N1 virus infections, respectively [58, 59].

The route of vaccine administration is an important parameter that, can significantly affect the quality and quantity of the immune responses [60]. In this study, mucosal administration with recombinant L. casei in mice elicited not only systemic IgG but also local IgA, in mice, which is in agreement with previous observations [36, 61]. Our results indicated that intranasal administration of the vaccine enhanced HA1-specific IgA antibody responses in the respiratory tract, while oral inoculation triggered a more potent IgA antibody response in the intestinal surface. The magnitude of HA1-specific IgA antibodies varied between oral and intranasal immunization, possibly due to the distinct way in which antigens are processed and presented to the immune cells in two mucosal compartments. However, the respiratory tract is the primary site of influenza infection, necessitating a high IgA concentration in the lungs or nasal surfaces. This is why the mice subjected to intranasal immunization fared better after influenza infection (Fig. 4).

Antigen-induced cell-mediated immune responses are essential for host protection against AIV infection. Lactobacilli have been shown to promote the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL‐6, IL‐12, and TNF‐α, which further stimulate NK cells to secrete IFN‐γ to enhance cytotoxic CD8 T lymphocyte (CTL) responses [62]. Our data suggest that intranasal inoculation of pgsA-HA1/L. casei stimulated a tremendous increase in antigen-specific systemic IFN-γ levels compared to oral administration of the same antigen. Additionally, we observed that oral and intranasal administration of L. casei surface-exposed HA1 induced different levels of local IL-4 cytokines in secondary lymphoid organs, likely due to differences in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALTs), where the immune responses to the antigen are initiated [63]. These results suggest that our L. casie-based mucosal vaccine potentiates CD4+ Th1/Th2-skewed, possibly in combination with CD8+ T-cells to the HA1 antigen. Further investigation is needed to understand the proliferation of effector and memory CD4+/CD8+ T cell subsets activated by the pgsA-HA1/L. casei vaccine.

Lactobacilli are low-toxic commensal organisms, have well-established safety records, and are held Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) and Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) status. This allows for the design of vaccines that have minimal side effects while preserving their inherent adjuvant properties to stimulate immune responses [64]. Mucosal administration of LAB vaccines is capable of stimulating both systemic and mucosal immune responses [65]. This non-invasive method is a preferable alternative for individuals who are needle-averse. LAB elicit minimal immune responses against themselves while inducing high levels of immune responses to foreign antigens following uptake via the mucosal immune system [66]. They are also efficiently transported to Peyer's patches, which are the inductive sites of the mucosal immune system, meeting the requirements of a delivery system for mucosal immunization [67]. However, there are several safety concerns associated with the practical application of recombinant LAB vaccines, including the potential release of genetically modified organisms into the environment and the development of antibiotic resistance [68].

In summary, our findings revealed that administering recombinant pgsA-HA1/L. casei via mucosal routes induced local and systemic protective immune responses that protected mice against infection with the H5N2 virus. These results suggest that, recombinant pgsA-HA1/L. casei potential as a mucosal vaccine candidate against future outbreaks of H5N2 virus. However, to ensure the broad applicability of this vaccine studies are necessary to determine whether it can provide similar protective efficacy against other H5Nx viruses.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Chungnam National University

The authors thank Dr. Y.K. Choi (Chungbuk National University, South Korea) for providing H5N2/HA sequence-bearing plasmid and mouse-adapted A/Aquatic bird/Korea/W81/2005(H5N2) virus.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: J.-S.L., and C.J.K.; Methodology: C.J.K., J.-S.L., D.T.H. and W.A.G.C.; Formal Analysis: D.T.H., W.A.G.C., and K.C.; Investigation: D.T.H., W.A.G.C., K.C., J.-S.L., and C.J.K.; Writing (original draft preparation): D.T.H. and W.A.G.C.; Writing (review and editing): C.J.K. and J.-S.L.; Data curation: D.T.H., W.A.G.C., K.C., J.-S.L., and C.J.K.; Validation: D.T.H., W.A.G.C., K.C., J.-S.L., and C.J.K.; Visualization D.T.H., W.A.G.C. and J.-S.L.; Supervision and Funding Acquisition: J.-S.L., and C.J.K..

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Antigen construction and expression. (A) Schematic depiction of the pKV-Pald-pgsA-HA1 plasmid. (B) The immunoblotting of the fractionated recombinant L. casei, pgsA/L. casei and pgsA-HA1/L. casei using anti-pgsA and anti-H5N2 polyclonal antibodies. Lanes 1, 2, and 3 illustrated L. casei, pgsA/L. casei and pgsA-HA1/L. casei, respectively. (C) FACS analysis. The recombinant pgsA/L. casei and pgsA-HA1/L. casei cells were probed with mouse anti-H5N2 antibody, followed by Cy3-conjugated donkey mouse anti-IgG antibody.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 735-745https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2307.07040

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Evaluation of the antigen-specific humoral immune responses induced by pgsA-HA1/L. casei. Mice were grouped as mentioned in materials and methods, then immunized at days 0 to 2, 7 to 9, and 21 to 23 orally and intranasally. Blood and feces samples were collected on days -1, 14, and 28. Lung and small intestine samples were collected on day 28 after immunization. Induction of HA1-specific humoral immune responses by mucosal immunization of pgsA-HA1/L. casei were determined by indirect ELISA and virus neutralization assay. (A) Schematic depiction of mouse experiment strategy. (B) HA1- specific serum IgG titers (left panel) and fecal IgA titers (right panel) in the orally immunized groups. (C) Similarly, in the intranasally immunized groups, HA1-specific serum IgG titers (left panel) and fecal IgA titers (right panel). (D) HA1-specific IgA titers in the lungs (left panel) and the small intestines (right panel) in the orally immunized groups. (E) Similarly, HA1- specific IgA titers in the lungs (left panel) and the small intestines (right panel) in the intranasally immunized groups. (F) HA1- specific IgG1 and IgG2a titers in the orally immunized groups. (G) Reciprocals of virus-neutralizing antibody titers specific to the H5N2 virus in the orally immunized groups. (H) HA1-specific IgG1 and IgG2a titers in the intranasally immunized groups. (I) Reciprocals of virus-neutralizing antibody titers specific to the H5N2 virus in the intranasally immunized groups. The bars denote the means ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test., *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 735-745https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2307.07040

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Evaluation of potential antigen-specific cellular immune responses induced by pgsA-HA1/L. casei. Mice were grouped as mentioned in materials and methods, then immunized at days 0 to 2, 7 to 9, and 21 to 23 orally and intranasally. Local LNs and spleen lymphocytes were collected on day 28 after immunization. Induction of potential HA1- specific cellular immune responses by mucosal immunization of pgsA-HA1/L. casei was determined by cytokine ELISA and ELISPOT assays. (A) Schematic depiction of mouse experiment strategy. (B) HA1-protein specific interleukin-4 (IL-4) production by mesenteric and Peyer’s patches LN lymphocytes (1 × 106 cells) in the orally immunized groups by ELISA. (C) HA1-specific interleukin-4 (IL-4) production by cervical and mesenteric LN lymphocytes (1 × 106 cells) in the intranasally immunized groups by ELISA. (D) and (E) HA1-specific IL-4 spots forming splenic lymphocytes (1 × 106 cells) in the orally and intranasally immunized groups by ELISPOT, respectively. (F) and (G) HA1- specific interferon-γ (IFN-γ) spots forming splenic lymphocytes (1 × 106 cells) in the orally and intranasally immunized groups by ELISPOT, respectively. PHA: Phytohaemagglutinin. The bars denote the means ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test., *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 735-745https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2307.07040

Fig 4.

Figure 4.Protective efficacy of the pgsA-HA1/L. casei against lethal H5N2 infection. Mice were grouped as mentioned in materials and methods, then immunized at days 0 to 2, 7 to 9, and 21 to 23 orally and intranasally. Mice were intranasally challenged with 10LD50 of mouse-adapted A/Aquatic bird/Korea/W81/2005 (H5N2). After the challenge, changes in body weight and proportion of survival were monitored for 12 days. Lungs were aseptically collected on days 3 and 5 postchallenge; virus titers in the lung tissues were investigated by TCID50 in MDCK cells following the infection with H5N2. (A) Schematic depiction of mouse experiment strategy. (B) and (C) Changes in body weight and (D) and (E) survival rates of orally and intranasally immunized groups, respectively. (F) and (G) Virus titers in the lung tissues in orally and intranasally immunized groups, respectively. The bars denote the means ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test., **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2024; 34: 735-745https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2307.07040

References

  1. Selleck P, Kirkland P. Avian influenza, Australia: Australian and New Zealand standard diagnostic procedures for animal diseases, Sub-Committee on Animal Health Laboratory Standards for Animal Health Committee; 2009. http://www.scahls.org.au. cited 2010 Feb 14.
  2. Blagodatski A, Trutneva K, Glazova O, Mityaeva O, Shevkova L, Kegeles E, et al. 2021. Avian influenza in wild birds and poultry: Dissemination pathways, monitoring methods, and virus ecology. Pathogens 10: 630.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Shirvani E, Varghese BP, Paldurai A, Samal SK. 2020. A recombinant avian paramyxovirus serotype 3 expressing the hemagglutinin protein protects chickens against H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus challenge. Sci. Rep. 10: 2221.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Byrne AM, Reid SM, Seekings AH, Núñez A, Obeso Prieto AB, Ridout S, et al. 2021. H7N7 avian influenza virus mutation from low to high pathogenicity on a layer chicken farm in the UK. Viruses 13: 259.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Seekings A, Slomka M, Russell C, Howard W, Choudhury B, Nunez A, et al. 2018. Direct evidence of H7N7 avian influenza virus mutation from low to high virulence on a single poultry premises during an outbreak in free range chickens in the UK, 2008. Infect. Genet. Evol. 64: 13-31.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Laleye AT, Abolnik C. 2020. Emergence of highly pathogenic H5N2 and H7N1 influenza A viruses from low pathogenic precursors by serial passage in ovo. PLoS One 15: e0240290.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Dhingra MS, Artois J, Dellicour S, Lemey P, Dauphin G, Von Dobschuetz S, et al. 2018. Geographical and historical patterns in the emergences of novel highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5 and H7 viruses in poultry. Front. Vet. Sci. 5: 84.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Lee YN, Lee DH, Cheon SH, Park YR, Baek YG, Si YJ, et al. 2020. Genetic characteristics and pathogenesis of H5 low pathogenic avian influenza viruses from wild birds and domestic ducks in South Korea. Sci. Rep. 10: 12151.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Taubenberger J, Morens D. 2009. Pandemic influenza-including a risk assessment of H5N1. Rev. Sci. Tech. 28: 187-202.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Cui J, Qu N, Guo Y, Cao L, Wu S, Mei K, et al. 2017. Phylogeny, pathogenicity, and transmission of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in chickens. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 7: 328.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Jang Y, Seo SH. 2022. H5 cleavage-site peptide vaccine protects chickens from lethal infection by highly pathogenic H5 avian influenza viruses. Arch. Virol. 167: 67-75.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Liang WS, He YC, Wu HD, Li YT, Shih TH, Kao GS, et al. 2020. Ecological factors associated with persistent circulation of multiple highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses among poultry farms in Taiwan during 2015-17. PLoS One 15: e0236581.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Spackman E, Prosser DJ, Pantin-Jackwood M, Stephens CB, Berlin AM. 2019. Clade 2.3. 4.4 H5 north american highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses infect, but do not cause clinical signs in, American Black Ducks (Anas rubripes). Avian Dis. 63: 366-370.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Marchenko V, Goncharova N, Susloparov I, Kolosova N, Gudymo A, Svyatchenko S, et al. 2018. Isolation and characterization of H5Nx highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses of clade 2.3. 4.4 in Russia. Virology 525: 216-223.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Zhao K, Gu M, Zhong L, Duan Z, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, et al. 2013. Characterization of three H5N5 and one H5N8 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in China. Vet. Microbiol. 163: 351-357.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Lee YJ, Kang HM, Lee EK, Song BM, Jeong J, Kwon YK, et al. 2014. Novel reassortant influenza A (H5N8) viruses, South Korea, 2014. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20: 1087-1089.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. Pan M, Gao R, Lv Q, Huang S, Zhou Z, Yang L, et al. 2016. Human infection with a novel, highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N6) virus: virological and clinical findings. J. Infect. 72: 52-59.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Lee JH, Pascua PNQ, Song MS, Baek YH, Kim CJ, Choi HW, et al. 2009. Isolation and genetic characterization of H5N2 influenza viruses from pigs in Korea. J. Virol. 83: 4205-4215.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Choi WS, Baek YH, Kwon JJ, Jeong JH, Park SJ, Kim YI, et al. 2017. Rapid acquisition of polymorphic virulence markers during adaptation of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N8 virus in the mouse. Sci. Rep. 7: 40667.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  20. Lee DH, Song CS. 2013. H9N2 avian influenza virus in Korea: evolution and vaccination. Clin. Exper. Vaccine Res. 2: 26-33.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  21. Bridges CB, Katz JM, Seto WH, Chan PK, Tsang D, Ho W, et al. 2000. Risk of influenza A (H5N1) infection among health care workers exposed to patients with influenza A (H5N1), Hong Kong. J. Infect. Dis. 181: 344-348.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Ungchusak K, Auewarakul P, Dowell SF, Kitphati R, Auwanit W, Puthavathana P, et al. 2005. Probable person-to-person transmission of avian influenza A (H5N1). New England J. Med. 352: 333-340.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Webster RG, Govorkova EA. 2006. H5N1 influenza-continuing evolution and spread. New Eng. J. Med. 355: 2174-2177.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Denney L, Ho L-P. 2018. The role of respiratory epithelium in host defence against influenza virus infection. Biomed. J. 41: 218-233.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  25. Brokstad KA, Eriksson J-C, Cox RJ, Tynning T, Olofsson J, Jonsson R, et al. 2002. Parenteral vaccination against influenza does not induce a local antigen-specific immune response in the nasal mucosa. J. Infect. Dis. 185: 878-884.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Liu H, Patil HP, de Vries-Idema J, Wilschut J, Huckriede A. 2013. Evaluation of mucosal and systemic immune responses elicited by GPI-0100-adjuvanted influenza vaccine delivered by different immunization strategies. PLoS One 8: e69649.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  27. Kim L, Martinez CJ, Hodgson KA, Trager GR, Brandl JR, Sandefer EP, et al. 2016. Systemic and mucosal immune responses following oral adenoviral delivery of influenza vaccine to the human intestine by radio controlled capsule. Sci. Rep. 6: 37295.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  28. Baker JR Jr, Farazuddin M, Wong PT, O'Konek JJ. 2022. The unfulfilled potential of mucosal immunization. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 150: 1-11.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  29. Calzas C, Chevalier C. 2019. Innovative mucosal vaccine formulations against influenza A virus infections. Front. Immunol. 10: 1605.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Kikuchi Y, Kunitoh-Asari A, Hayakawa K, Imai S, Kasuya K, Abe K, et al. 2014. Oral administration of Lactobacillus plantarum strain AYA enhances IgA secretion and provides survival protection against influenza virus infection in mice. PLoS One 9: e86416.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Lee YN, Youn HN, Kwon JH, Lee DH, Park JK, Yuk SS, et al. 2013. Sublingual administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus affects respiratory immune responses and facilitates protection against influenza virus infection in mice. Antiviral Res. 98: 284-290.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Wang Z, Yu Q, Fu J, Liang J, Yang Q. 2013. Immune responses of chickens inoculated with recombinant L actobacillus expressing the haemagglutinin of the avian influenza virus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 115: 1269-1277.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Poo H, Pyo HM, Lee TY, Yoon SW, Lee JS, Kim CJ, et al. 2006. Oral administration of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 displayed on Lactobacillus casei induces E7‐specific antitumor effects in C57/BL6 mice. Int. J. Cancer 119: 1702-1709.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. Lee JS, Poo H, Han DP, Hong SP, Kim K, Cho MW, et al. 2006. Mucosal immunization with surface-displayed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein on Lactobacillus casei induces neutralizing antibodies in mice. J. Virol. 80: 4079-4087.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  35. Li R, Chowdhury MY, Kim JH, Kim TH, Pathinayake P, Koo WS, et al. 2015. Mucosally administered Lactobacillus surface-displayed influenza antigens (sM2 and HA2) with cholera toxin subunit A1 (CTA1) Induce broadly protective immune responses against divergent influenza subtypes. Vet. Microbiol. 179: 250-263.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Chowdhury MY, Li R, Kim JH, Park ME, Kim TH, Pathinayake P, et al. 2014. Mucosal vaccination with recombinant Lactobacillus casei-displayed CTA1-conjugated consensus matrix protein-2 (sM2) induces broad protection against divergent influenza subtypes in BALB/c mice. PLoS One 9: e94051.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  37. Zhang N, Zheng BJ, Lu L, Zhou Y, Jiang S, Du L. 2015. Advancements in the development of subunit influenza vaccines. Microb. Infect. 17: 123-134.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  38. Khurana S, Verma S, Verma N, Crevar CJ, Carter DM, Manischewitz J, et al. 2011. Bacterial HA1 vaccine against pandemic H5N1 influenza virus: evidence of oligomerization, hemagglutination, and cross-protective immunity in ferrets. J. Virol. 85: 1246-1256.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  39. Du L, Zhao G, Sun S, Zhang X, Zhou X, Guo Y, et al. 2013. A critical HA1 neutralizing domain of H5N1 influenza in an optimal conformation induces strong cross-protection. PLoS One 8: e53568.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  40. Palomino MM, Allievi MC, Prado-Acosta M, Sanchez-Rivas C, Ruzal SM. 2010. New method for electroporation of Lactobacillus species grown in high salt. J. Microbiol. Methods 83: 164-167.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Velumani S, Ho HT, He F, Musthaq S, Prabakaran M, Kwang J. 2011. A novel peptide ELISA for universal detection of antibodies to human H5N1 influenza viruses. PLoS One 6: e20737.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  42. Reed LJ, Muench H. 1938. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am. J. Epidemiol. 27: 493-497.
    CrossRef
  43. Gross FL, Bai Y, Jefferson S, Holiday C, Levine MZ. 2017. Measuring influenza neutralizing antibody responses to A (H3N2) viruses in human sera by microneutralization assays using MDCK-SIAT1 cells. J. Vis. Exp. 129: 56448.
    CrossRef
  44. van Riet E, Ainai A, Suzuki T, Hasegawa H. 2012. Mucosal IgA responses in influenza virus infections; thoughts for vaccine design. Vaccine 30: 5893-5900.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  45. Putcharoen O, Wacharapluesadee S, Chia WN, Paitoonpong L, Tan CW, Suwanpimolkul G, et al. 2021. Early detection of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients in Thailand. PLoS One 16: e0246864.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  46. Lopez CE, Legge KL. 2020. Influenza A virus vaccination: immunity, protection, and recent advances toward a universal vaccine. Vaccines 8: 434.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  47. Fukuyama Y, Tokuhara D, Kataoka K, Gilbert RS, McGhee JR, Yuki Y, et al. 2012. Novel vaccine development strategies for inducing mucosal immunity. Expe. Rev. Vaccines 11: 367-379.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  48. Muñoz-Provencio D, Llopis M, Antolín M, De Torres I, Guarner F, Pérez-Martínez G, et al. 2009. Adhesion properties of Lactobacillus casei strains to resected intestinal fragments and components of the extracellular matrix. Arch. Microbiol. 191: 153-161.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  49. Christensen HR, Frøkiær H, Pestka JJ. 2002. Lactobacilli differentially modulate expression of cytokines and maturation surface markers in murine dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 168: 171-178.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. D'Arienzo R, Maurano F, Luongo D, Mazzarella G, Stefanile R, Troncone R, et al. 2008. Adjuvant effect of Lactobacillus casei in a mouse model of gluten sensitivity. Immunol. Lett. 119: 78-83.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. Mohamadzadeh M, Olson S, Kalina WV, Ruthel G, Demmin GL, Warfield KL, et al. 2005. Lactobacilli activate human dendritic cells that skew T cells toward T helper 1 polarization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102: 2880-2885.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  52. Pouwels PH, Leer RJ, Shaw M, den Bak-Glashouwer M-JH, Tielen FD, Smit E, et al. 1998. Lactic acid bacteria as antigen delivery vehicles for oral immunization purposes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 41: 155-167.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  53. Lee SY, Choi JH, Xu Z. 2003. Microbial cell-surface display. Trends Biotechnol. 21: 45-52.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  54. Russell CJ, Hu M, Okda FA. 2018. Influenza hemagglutinin protein stability, activation, and pandemic risk. Trends Microbiol. 26: 841-853.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  55. Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. 2000. Receptor binding and membrane fusion in virus entry: the influenza hemagglutinin. Ann. Rev. Biochemy. 69: 531-569.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  56. Wiley DC, Skehel JJ. 1987. The structure and function of the hemagglutinin membrane glycoprotein of influenza virus. Annu. Rev. Biochemy. 56: 365-394.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  57. Gerhard W, Yewdell J, Frankel ME, Webster R. 1981. Antigenic structure of influenza virus haemagglutinin defined by hybridoma antibodies. Nature 290: 713-717.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  58. Zhang Y, Yang L, Zhang J, Huang K, Sun X, Yang Y, et al. 2022. Oral or intranasal immunization with recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum displaying head domain of Swine Influenza A virus hemagglutinin protects mice from H1N1 virus. Microb. Cell. Fact. 21: 185.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  59. Lei H, Sheng Z, Ding Q, Chen J, Wei X, Lam DM-K, et al. 2011. Evaluation of oral immunization with recombinant avian influenza virus HA1 displayed on the Lactococcus lactis surface and combined with the mucosal adjuvant cholera toxin subunit B. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 18: 1046-1051.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  60. Rosenbaum P, Tchitchek N, Joly C, Rodriguez Pozo A, Stimmer L, Langlois S, et al. 2021. Vaccine inoculation route modulates early immunity and consequently antigen-specific immune response. Front. Immunol. 12: 645210.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  61. Wang Z, Yu Q, Gao J, Yang Q. 2012. Mucosal and systemic immune responses induced by recombinant Lactobacillus spp. expressing the hemagglutinin of the avian influenza virus H5N1. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 19: 174-179.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  62. Vissers YM, Snel J, Zuurendonk PF, Smit BA, Wichers HJ, Savelkoul HF. 2010. Differential effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus plantarum strains on cytokine induction in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 59: 60-70.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  63. Wiley JA, Tighe MP, Harmsen AG. 2005. Upper respiratory tract resistance to influenza infection is not prevented by the absence of either nasal-associated lymphoid tissue or cervical lymph nodes. J. Immunol. 175: 3186-3196.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  64. de Pinho Favaro MT, Atienza-Garriga J, Martínez-Torró C, Parladé E, Vázquez E, Corchero JL, et al. 2022. Recombinant vaccines in 2022: a perspective from the cell factory. Microb. Cell Fact. 21: 1-17.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  65. Singh SK, Roeffen W, Mistarz UH, Chourasia BK, Yang F, Rand KD, et al. 2017. Construct design, production, and characterization of Plasmodium falciparum 48/45 R0. 6C subunit protein produced in Lactococcus lactis as candidate vaccine. Microb. Cell Fact. 16: 1-11.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  66. LeCureux JS, Dean GA. 2018. Lactobacillus mucosal vaccine vectors: immune responses against bacterial and viral antigens. Msphere. 3: 10.1128/msphere.00061-00018.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  67. Shirdast H, Ebrahimzadeh F, Taromchi AH, Mortazavi Y, Esmaeilzadeh A, Sekhavati MH, et al. 2021. Recombinant Lactococcus lactis dsplaying Omp31 antigen of Brucella melitensis can induce an immunogenic response in BALB/c Mice. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 13: 80-89.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  68. Detmer A, Glenting J. 2006. Live bacterial vaccines-a review and identification of potential hazards. Microb. Cell Fact. 5: 1-12.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef