Articles Service
Research article
Mucosal Administration of Lactobacillus casei Surface-Displayed HA1 Induces Protective Immune Responses against Avian Influenza A Virus in Mice
College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34314, Republic of Korea
Correspondence to:J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024; 34(3): 735-745
Published March 28, 2024 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2307.07040
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Abstract
Keywords
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
Avian influenza (AI), caused by AI viruses (AIVs) from
HPAIVs of the H5 subtype, derived from the A/Goose/Guangdong/1/1996 (H5N1) lineage, known as H5Nx viruses, have become a growing concern due to their increasing prevalence and their potential to cause human infections [9]. These viruses have evolved into ten genetic clades [10]. Among the ten clades, clade-2 viruses are successively dominant and endemic in many countries [11]. Outbreaks of H5N5 and H5N2 HPAIVs have been reported in Asia, Europe, and North America since 2008 [12-15]. In addition, H5N8 viruses from clade 2.3.4.4 were primarily reported in Korea in early 2014 and spread globally in many countries [16]. In 2014, a novel H5N6 reassortant-caused human infection was first reported in China [17]. The recurrence of H5N2 LPAIV raises concerns about the exchange of genetic characteristics between divergent isolates [18-20]. Although H5Nx viruses are currently unable to efficiently transmit among humans [21, 22], their continued evolution and lack of population-level immunity make them a potential pandemic threat [23]. Therefore, the development of an effective H5 subtype AI vaccine is urgently needed.
The respiratory tract mucosa serves as the site of entry and replication of the AI virus as well as the front line of defense against infections [24]. However, current parenteral AI vaccine modalities generally fail to induce local immune responses [25, 26], which is why mucosally administered vaccines are more effective [27]. These mucosal vaccines can elicit both local and systemic immunity but, local barriers remain a bottleneck of antigen uptake by microfold cells and professional antigen-presenting cells [28]. To overcome this issue, it is necessary to investigate safer and more efficient mucosal vaccine carriers for clinical use [29].
In previous studies, we successfully engineered the
In this study, we selected the HA1 domain (residues 17 to 330) of A/aquatic bird/Korea/W81/2005(H5N2) as a representative immunogen for AI H5 subtypes and investigated the immunogenicity of HA1 which was displayed on the surface of
Materials and Methods
pgsA-HA1/L. casei Construction and Expression
The plasmid encoding the H5N2/HA sequence was kindly provided by Dr. Young-Ki Choi (Chungbuk National University, South Korea). The plasmid pKV-Pald-PgsA, harboring the pgsA genes of
The plasmids pKV-Pald-pgsA (empty plasmid) and pKV-Pald-pgsA-HA1 were introduced into
To perform fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), recombinant
Mouse Experimental Schedule, Sample Collection, and Virus Challenge
Specific pathogen-free female BALB/c mice (6-week age) were purchased from Samtako (South Korea) and maintained in a ventilated milieu with ad libitum access to water and food. The room was maintained at a temperature of 18-23°C, relative humidity of 50-60%, and a 12 h light/dark cycle. All mice were allowed to acclimate for 7 days before the start of the experiment. All experiments were conducted under appropriate conditions with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chungnam National University (approval number CNU-00432). In all intranasal immunization and challenge experiments, mice were anesthetized with intraperitoneal administration of avertin (2.5%) at a dosage of 0.015 ml/g bodyweight.
The study consisted of two sets of mice, one for oral and one for intranasal immunization. Each set was divided into three experimental groups, consisting of 19 mice (eight for characterization of humoral and cellular immune responses, five for survival analysis and six for lung virus titers at 3 and 5 days post-challenge (dpc). The mice were immunized with pgsA-HA1/
Spleens, cervical lymph nodes, mesenteric LNs and Peyer’s patches LNs were aseptically collected on day 28 and stored in RPMI media (PAN Biotech, Germany). All tissue samples were separated through a 70 μm cell strainer filter (SPL Life science, South Korea), and lymphocytes from cervical, mesenteric and Peyer’s patches LNs were kept on ice. Splenocytes from the spleens were harvested after the lysis of red blood cells with ammonium-chloride-potassium buffer. The cells were then suspended in complete RPMI media containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) with 1% antimycotic and antibiotic (Gibco, USA). A synthetic peptide containing the conserved epitope of H5-subtype hemagglutinin (CNTKCQTPMGAINSS) [41] was synthesized by Peptron Inc. (South Korea). This synthetic peptide was used for in vitro re-stimulation assays at a concentration of 5 μg/well.
To assess the protective efficacy of the pgsA-HA1/
ELISA
Antibodies specific to HA1 were determined using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). To coat the 96-well immunosorbent plates (Corning, USA), the above synthetic peptide (500 ng/well) was added and allowed to incubate overnight at 4°C. Following, 2 h of blocking at RT with 10% skim. Serum (1:50) or supernatants of homogenized tissues or feces (1:200) were added to the plates and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. The plates were then incubated with secondary HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG, -IgG1, IgG2a, -IgA antibodies (diluted 1:3000; Sigma, USA) for 2 h at 37°C. The plates were then incubated in the dark for 10 min with a mixed substrate solution of 3,3’,5,5’-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) and H2O2. Finally, the reaction was stopped by adding 2N-H2SO4, and optical density values at 450 nm wavelength were measured with an Apollo ELISA Reader (Berthold technologies, Germany).
Sandwich ELISA was used to evaluate the levels of antigen-specific interleukin-4 (IL-4) secretion in the local LNs. For the in vitro stimulation assay, 1 × 106 lymphocytes from cervical, mesenteric and Peyer’s patches LNs were incubated with the above synthetic peptide in complete RPMI media at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 72 h. The culture supernatants were collected, centrifuged and stored at -20°C for further analysis. The production of IL-4 was measured using a cytokine ELISA kit (BD Biosciences, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions.
ELISPOT
The HA1specific cellular immune responses were evaluated by using an ELISPOT assay with the mouse IFN-γ ELISPOT set and mouse IL-4 ELISPOT set according to the manufacturers’ specifications (BD Bioscience, USA). First, 96-well ELISPOT plates were coated with anti-mouse IFN-γ or anti-IL-4 capture antibodies (5 μg/ml) in PBS and incubated at 4°C overnight. Then plates were blocked for 2 h at RT with 200 μl/well complete RPMI media. Next, 1 × 106 splenocytes were added to each well and incubated for 48 h at 37°C with 5% CO2 in complete RPMI media containing the above synthetic peptide (5 μg/well), complete RPMI media (negative control) or RPMI media with 5 μg/ml phytohaemagglutinin (positive control) (Invitrogen, USA). The cells were then discarded from the plates and treated with biotinylated anti-mouse IFN-γ and IL-4 antibodies, streptavidin HRP and AEC substrate solution. The substrate reaction was terminated by washing with deionized water. Finally, the spots were enumerated using the CTL-Immunospot S5 UV analyzer (Cellular Technologies, USA).
Lung Virus Titer
The lungs were aseptically collected to determine virus titers using 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) as previously described [35]. In brief, lung tissues were homogenized in sterilized PBS containing 1% antibiotic and antimycotic solution, followed by centrifugation (12,000 ×
Serum Neutralization Test
The level of H5N2-specific neutralizing antibodies in sera was determined by conducting a serum neutralization test with modification to the protocol described previously [43]. In 96-well microliter plates, 50 μl of 2-fold serial dilution of receptor-destroying enzyme (Denka Seiken, Japan) was treated and then inactivated serum at 56°C for 30 min in FBS free DMEM was mixed with 50 μl of 100 TCID50 of Vero cell adapted H5N2 virus. This mixture was then incubated at 37°C for 1h, 5 × 103/100 μl of Vero cells were added to each well, and the plates were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 4 days. The virus-induced cytopathic effect was examined and the reciprocal of the highest serum dilution at which cytopathic effect could be observed was used to determine the neutralizing antibody titers.
Statistical Analysis
The results are reported as the mean values with standard deviations (S.D.). Discrepancies between groups were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test. Survival rates were compared using the log-rank test, using GraphPad Prism 6 software. The threshold for statistically significance was set at
Results
Construction, Expression and Surface Localization of pgsA-HA1
Initially, we constructed a pKV-Pald-pgsA-HA1 plasmid containing a fusion gene of pgsA-HA1 (Fig. 1A).
-
Fig. 1. Antigen construction and expression.
(A) Schematic depiction of the pKV-Pald-pgsA-HA1 plasmid. (B) The immunoblotting of the fractionated recombinant
L. casei , pgsA/L. casei and pgsA-HA1/L. casei using anti-pgsA and anti-H5N2 polyclonal antibodies. Lanes 1, 2, and 3 illustratedL. casei , pgsA/L. casei and pgsA-HA1/L. casei , respectively. (C) FACS analysis. The recombinant pgsA/L. casei and pgsA-HA1/L. casei cells were probed with mouse anti-H5N2 antibody, followed by Cy3-conjugated donkey mouse anti-IgG antibody.
Upon proper localization to the
Recombinant pgsA-HA1/L. casei Induced systemic and local humoral immune responses
To assess the humoral immune responses of pgsA-HA1/
-
Fig. 2. Evaluation of the antigen-specific humoral immune responses induced by pgsA-HA1/
L. casei . Mice were grouped as mentioned in materials and methods, then immunized at days 0 to 2, 7 to 9, and 21 to 23 orally and intranasally. Blood and feces samples were collected on days -1, 14, and 28. Lung and small intestine samples were collected on day 28 after immunization. Induction of HA1-specific humoral immune responses by mucosal immunization of pgsA-HA1/L. casei were determined by indirect ELISA and virus neutralization assay. (A) Schematic depiction of mouse experiment strategy. (B) HA1- specific serum IgG titers (left panel) and fecal IgA titers (right panel) in the orally immunized groups. (C) Similarly, in the intranasally immunized groups, HA1-specific serum IgG titers (left panel) and fecal IgA titers (right panel). (D) HA1-specific IgA titers in the lungs (left panel) and the small intestines (right panel) in the orally immunized groups. (E) Similarly, HA1- specific IgA titers in the lungs (left panel) and the small intestines (right panel) in the intranasally immunized groups. (F) HA1- specific IgG1 and IgG2a titers in the orally immunized groups. (G) Reciprocals of virus-neutralizing antibody titers specific to the H5N2 virus in the orally immunized groups. (H) HA1-specific IgG1 and IgG2a titers in the intranasally immunized groups. (I) Reciprocals of virus-neutralizing antibody titers specific to the H5N2 virus in the intranasally immunized groups. The bars denote the means ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test., *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
To further analyze the antigen-specific systemic humoral immune responses induced by pgsA-HA1/
pgsA-HA1/L. casei Enhanced H5N2 Specific Virus-Neutralizing Antibodies
Virus-neutralizing activity is a direct and sensitive measure for functional antibodies [45]. To examine whether the pgsA-HA1/
pgsA-HA1/L. casei Induces Potential HA1-Specific Cellular Immune Response
In addition to humoral immune responses, cellular immune responses are also important for influenza clearing [46]. In this study, mice were immunized through oral and intranasal routes per the specific scheme (Fig. 3A). To evaluate potential antigen-specific T cell responses, in vitro lymphocyte restimulation assays were conducted using cells from cervical, mesenteric and Peyer’s patches LNs on day 28 after immunization. The mesenteric and Peyer’s patches LN cells were isolated from the mice orally inoculated with pgsA-HA1/
-
Fig. 3. Evaluation of potential antigen-specific cellular immune responses induced by pgsA-HA1/
L. casei . Mice were grouped as mentioned in materials and methods, then immunized at days 0 to 2, 7 to 9, and 21 to 23 orally and intranasally. Local LNs and spleen lymphocytes were collected on day 28 after immunization. Induction of potential HA1- specific cellular immune responses by mucosal immunization of pgsA-HA1/L. casei was determined by cytokine ELISA and ELISPOT assays. (A) Schematic depiction of mouse experiment strategy. (B) HA1-protein specific interleukin-4 (IL-4) production by mesenteric and Peyer’s patches LN lymphocytes (1 × 106 cells) in the orally immunized groups by ELISA. (C) HA1-specific interleukin-4 (IL-4) production by cervical and mesenteric LN lymphocytes (1 × 106 cells) in the intranasally immunized groups by ELISA. (D) and (E) HA1-specific IL-4 spots forming splenic lymphocytes (1 × 106 cells) in the orally and intranasally immunized groups by ELISPOT, respectively. (F) and (G) HA1- specific interferon-γ (IFN-γ) spots forming splenic lymphocytes (1 × 106 cells) in the orally and intranasally immunized groups by ELISPOT, respectively. PHA: Phytohaemagglutinin. The bars denote the means ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test., *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Furthermore, cellular immune responses to pgsA-HA1/
-
Fig. 4. Protective efficacy of the pgsA-HA1/
L. casei against lethal H5N2 infection. Mice were grouped as mentioned in materials and methods, then immunized at days 0 to 2, 7 to 9, and 21 to 23 orally and intranasally. Mice were intranasally challenged with 10LD50 of mouse-adapted A/Aquatic bird/Korea/W81/2005 (H5N2). After the challenge, changes in body weight and proportion of survival were monitored for 12 days. Lungs were aseptically collected on days 3 and 5 postchallenge; virus titers in the lung tissues were investigated by TCID50 in MDCK cells following the infection with H5N2. (A) Schematic depiction of mouse experiment strategy. (B) and (C) Changes in body weight and (D) and (E) survival rates of orally and intranasally immunized groups, respectively. (F) and (G) Virus titers in the lung tissues in orally and intranasally immunized groups, respectively. The bars denote the means ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test., **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Mucosal Immunization of pgsA-HA1/L. casei Showed Protection against Lethal H5N2 Virus Challenge
Given that pgsA-HA1/
Immunization with pgsA-HA1/L. casei Reduced Lung Virus Titers after H5N2 Challenge
Viral load in the lungs after infection is a reliable indicator of vaccine protection efficacy. The viral load in the lungs was quantified using the TCID50 method. pgsA-
Discussion
Mucosal immunity plays a significant role in defense against influenza virus infections, and the induction of effective mucosal immune response is the primary objective of vaccination. However, mucosal barriers typically respond to exogenous antigens with tolerance instead of immune activation, making it difficult to elicit local immune responses through immunization. Consequently, significant efforts have focused on developing potential adjuvants and vaccine delivery vectors for mucosal application in order to overcome these challenges [47].
Recombinant lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are increasingly being used as a potential carrier for mucosal vaccine delivery due to their ability to adhere to mucosa surface [5, 36, 48], intrinsic immunomodulatory properties [49-52], and feasibility in displaying heterologous antigens on the surface [33, 34, 36]. The display of heterologous antigens on the bacterial surface is usually achieved by genetic fusion with a bacterial transmembrane anchoring protein [53]. In this study, we explored the potency of recombinant
HA is a classical type I membrane glycoprotein that plays key roles in viral adsorption and membrane fusion. This protein stimulates the production of functional antibodies and is the primary antigen in many preclinical studies [54]. During virus replication, the HA protein is initially translated as a single polypeptide precursor (HA0), which is later cleaved by host trypsin-like proteases into two subunits, HA1 and HA2 [55]. The HA1 subunit forms a membrane-distal globular head that contains the receptor-binding domain (RBD), and most of the antigenic regions are recognized by neutralizing antibodies [56, 57]. In this study, we proved that oral or intranasal administration of recombinant pgsA-HA1/
The route of vaccine administration is an important parameter that, can significantly affect the quality and quantity of the immune responses [60]. In this study, mucosal administration with recombinant
Antigen-induced cell-mediated immune responses are essential for host protection against AIV infection. Lactobacilli have been shown to promote the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL‐6, IL‐12, and TNF‐α, which further stimulate NK cells to secrete IFN‐γ to enhance cytotoxic CD8 T lymphocyte (CTL) responses [62]. Our data suggest that intranasal inoculation of pgsA-HA1/
In summary, our findings revealed that administering recombinant pgsA-HA1/
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Chungnam National University
The authors thank Dr. Y.K. Choi (Chungbuk National University, South Korea) for providing H5N2/HA sequence-bearing plasmid and mouse-adapted A/Aquatic bird/Korea/W81/2005(H5N2) virus.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: J.-S.L., and C.J.K.; Methodology: C.J.K., J.-S.L., D.T.H. and W.A.G.C.; Formal Analysis: D.T.H., W.A.G.C., and K.C.; Investigation: D.T.H., W.A.G.C., K.C., J.-S.L., and C.J.K.; Writing (original draft preparation): D.T.H. and W.A.G.C.; Writing (review and editing): C.J.K. and J.-S.L.; Data curation: D.T.H., W.A.G.C., K.C., J.-S.L., and C.J.K.; Validation: D.T.H., W.A.G.C., K.C., J.-S.L., and C.J.K.; Visualization D.T.H., W.A.G.C. and J.-S.L.; Supervision and Funding Acquisition: J.-S.L., and C.J.K..
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
References
- Selleck P, Kirkland P. Avian influenza, Australia: Australian and New Zealand standard diagnostic procedures for animal diseases, Sub-Committee on Animal Health Laboratory Standards for Animal Health Committee; 2009. http://www.scahls.org.au. cited 2010 Feb 14.
- Blagodatski A, Trutneva K, Glazova O, Mityaeva O, Shevkova L, Kegeles E,
et al . 2021. Avian influenza in wild birds and poultry: Dissemination pathways, monitoring methods, and virus ecology.Pathogens 10 : 630. - Shirvani E, Varghese BP, Paldurai A, Samal SK. 2020. A recombinant avian paramyxovirus serotype 3 expressing the hemagglutinin protein protects chickens against H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus challenge.
Sci. Rep. 10 : 2221. - Byrne AM, Reid SM, Seekings AH, Núñez A, Obeso Prieto AB, Ridout S,
et al . 2021. H7N7 avian influenza virus mutation from low to high pathogenicity on a layer chicken farm in the UK.Viruses 13 : 259. - Seekings A, Slomka M, Russell C, Howard W, Choudhury B, Nunez A,
et al . 2018. Direct evidence of H7N7 avian influenza virus mutation from low to high virulence on a single poultry premises during an outbreak in free range chickens in the UK, 2008.Infect. Genet. Evol. 64 : 13-31. - Laleye AT, Abolnik C. 2020. Emergence of highly pathogenic H5N2 and H7N1 influenza A viruses from low pathogenic precursors by serial passage in ovo.
PLoS One 15 : e0240290. - Dhingra MS, Artois J, Dellicour S, Lemey P, Dauphin G, Von Dobschuetz S,
et al . 2018. Geographical and historical patterns in the emergences of novel highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5 and H7 viruses in poultry.Front. Vet. Sci. 5 : 84. - Lee YN, Lee DH, Cheon SH, Park YR, Baek YG, Si YJ,
et al . 2020. Genetic characteristics and pathogenesis of H5 low pathogenic avian influenza viruses from wild birds and domestic ducks in South Korea.Sci. Rep. 10 : 12151. - Taubenberger J, Morens D. 2009. Pandemic influenza-including a risk assessment of H5N1.
Rev. Sci. Tech. 28 : 187-202. - Cui J, Qu N, Guo Y, Cao L, Wu S, Mei K,
et al . 2017. Phylogeny, pathogenicity, and transmission of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in chickens.Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 7 : 328. - Jang Y, Seo SH. 2022. H5 cleavage-site peptide vaccine protects chickens from lethal infection by highly pathogenic H5 avian influenza viruses.
Arch. Virol. 167 : 67-75. - Liang WS, He YC, Wu HD, Li YT, Shih TH, Kao GS,
et al . 2020. Ecological factors associated with persistent circulation of multiple highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses among poultry farms in Taiwan during 2015-17.PLoS One 15 : e0236581. - Spackman E, Prosser DJ, Pantin-Jackwood M, Stephens CB, Berlin AM. 2019. Clade 2.3. 4.4 H5 north american highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses infect, but do not cause clinical signs in, American Black Ducks (
Anas rubripes ).Avian Dis. 63 : 366-370. - Marchenko V, Goncharova N, Susloparov I, Kolosova N, Gudymo A, Svyatchenko S,
et al . 2018. Isolation and characterization of H5Nx highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses of clade 2.3. 4.4 in Russia.Virology 525 : 216-223. - Zhao K, Gu M, Zhong L, Duan Z, Zhang Y, Zhu Y,
et al . 2013. Characterization of three H5N5 and one H5N8 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in China.Vet. Microbiol. 163 : 351-357. - Lee YJ, Kang HM, Lee EK, Song BM, Jeong J, Kwon YK,
et al . 2014. Novel reassortant influenza A (H5N8) viruses, South Korea, 2014.Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20 : 1087-1089. - Pan M, Gao R, Lv Q, Huang S, Zhou Z, Yang L,
et al . 2016. Human infection with a novel, highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N6) virus: virological and clinical findings.J. Infect. 72 : 52-59. - Lee JH, Pascua PNQ, Song MS, Baek YH, Kim CJ, Choi HW,
et al . 2009. Isolation and genetic characterization of H5N2 influenza viruses from pigs in Korea.J. Virol. 83 : 4205-4215. - Choi WS, Baek YH, Kwon JJ, Jeong JH, Park SJ, Kim YI,
et al . 2017. Rapid acquisition of polymorphic virulence markers during adaptation of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N8 virus in the mouse.Sci. Rep. 7 : 40667. - Lee DH, Song CS. 2013. H9N2 avian influenza virus in Korea: evolution and vaccination.
Clin. Exper. Vaccine Res. 2 : 26-33. - Bridges CB, Katz JM, Seto WH, Chan PK, Tsang D, Ho W,
et al . 2000. Risk of influenza A (H5N1) infection among health care workers exposed to patients with influenza A (H5N1), Hong Kong.J. Infect. Dis. 181 : 344-348. - Ungchusak K, Auewarakul P, Dowell SF, Kitphati R, Auwanit W, Puthavathana P,
et al . 2005. Probable person-to-person transmission of avian influenza A (H5N1).New England J. Med. 352 : 333-340. - Webster RG, Govorkova EA. 2006. H5N1 influenza-continuing evolution and spread.
New Eng. J. Med. 355 : 2174-2177. - Denney L, Ho L-P. 2018. The role of respiratory epithelium in host defence against influenza virus infection.
Biomed. J. 41 : 218-233. - Brokstad KA, Eriksson J-C, Cox RJ, Tynning T, Olofsson J, Jonsson R,
et al . 2002. Parenteral vaccination against influenza does not induce a local antigen-specific immune response in the nasal mucosa.J. Infect. Dis. 185 : 878-884. - Liu H, Patil HP, de Vries-Idema J, Wilschut J, Huckriede A. 2013. Evaluation of mucosal and systemic immune responses elicited by GPI-0100-adjuvanted influenza vaccine delivered by different immunization strategies.
PLoS One 8 : e69649. - Kim L, Martinez CJ, Hodgson KA, Trager GR, Brandl JR, Sandefer EP,
et al . 2016. Systemic and mucosal immune responses following oral adenoviral delivery of influenza vaccine to the human intestine by radio controlled capsule.Sci. Rep. 6 : 37295. - Baker JR Jr, Farazuddin M, Wong PT, O'Konek JJ. 2022. The unfulfilled potential of mucosal immunization.
J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 150 : 1-11. - Calzas C, Chevalier C. 2019. Innovative mucosal vaccine formulations against influenza A virus infections.
Front. Immunol. 10 : 1605. - Kikuchi Y, Kunitoh-Asari A, Hayakawa K, Imai S, Kasuya K, Abe K,
et al . 2014. Oral administration ofLactobacillus plantarum strain AYA enhances IgA secretion and provides survival protection against influenza virus infection in mice.PLoS One 9 : e86416. - Lee YN, Youn HN, Kwon JH, Lee DH, Park JK, Yuk SS,
et al . 2013. Sublingual administration ofLactobacillus rhamnosus affects respiratory immune responses and facilitates protection against influenza virus infection in mice.Antiviral Res. 98 : 284-290. - Wang Z, Yu Q, Fu J, Liang J, Yang Q. 2013. Immune responses of chickens inoculated with recombinant L actobacillus expressing the haemagglutinin of the avian influenza virus.
J. Appl. Microbiol. 115 : 1269-1277. - Poo H, Pyo HM, Lee TY, Yoon SW, Lee JS, Kim CJ,
et al . 2006. Oral administration of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 displayed onLactobacillus casei induces E7‐specific antitumor effects in C57/BL6 mice.Int. J. Cancer 119 : 1702-1709. - Lee JS, Poo H, Han DP, Hong SP, Kim K, Cho MW,
et al . 2006. Mucosal immunization with surface-displayed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein onLactobacillus casei induces neutralizing antibodies in mice.J. Virol. 80 : 4079-4087. - Li R, Chowdhury MY, Kim JH, Kim TH, Pathinayake P, Koo WS,
et al . 2015. Mucosally administered Lactobacillus surface-displayed influenza antigens (sM2 and HA2) with cholera toxin subunit A1 (CTA1) Induce broadly protective immune responses against divergent influenza subtypes.Vet. Microbiol. 179 : 250-263. - Chowdhury MY, Li R, Kim JH, Park ME, Kim TH, Pathinayake P,
et al . 2014. Mucosal vaccination with recombinantLactobacillus casei -displayed CTA1-conjugated consensus matrix protein-2 (sM2) induces broad protection against divergent influenza subtypes in BALB/c mice.PLoS One 9 : e94051. - Zhang N, Zheng BJ, Lu L, Zhou Y, Jiang S, Du L. 2015. Advancements in the development of subunit influenza vaccines.
Microb. Infect. 17 : 123-134. - Khurana S, Verma S, Verma N, Crevar CJ, Carter DM, Manischewitz J,
et al . 2011. Bacterial HA1 vaccine against pandemic H5N1 influenza virus: evidence of oligomerization, hemagglutination, and cross-protective immunity in ferrets.J. Virol. 85 : 1246-1256. - Du L, Zhao G, Sun S, Zhang X, Zhou X, Guo Y,
et al . 2013. A critical HA1 neutralizing domain of H5N1 influenza in an optimal conformation induces strong cross-protection.PLoS One 8 : e53568. - Palomino MM, Allievi MC, Prado-Acosta M, Sanchez-Rivas C, Ruzal SM. 2010. New method for electroporation of
Lactobacillus species grown in high salt.J. Microbiol. Methods 83 : 164-167. - Velumani S, Ho HT, He F, Musthaq S, Prabakaran M, Kwang J. 2011. A novel peptide ELISA for universal detection of antibodies to human H5N1 influenza viruses.
PLoS One 6 : e20737. - Reed LJ, Muench H. 1938. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints.
Am. J. Epidemiol. 27 : 493-497. - Gross FL, Bai Y, Jefferson S, Holiday C, Levine MZ. 2017. Measuring influenza neutralizing antibody responses to A (H3N2) viruses in human sera by microneutralization assays using MDCK-SIAT1 cells.
J. Vis. Exp. 129 : 56448. - van Riet E, Ainai A, Suzuki T, Hasegawa H. 2012. Mucosal IgA responses in influenza virus infections; thoughts for vaccine design.
Vaccine 30 : 5893-5900. - Putcharoen O, Wacharapluesadee S, Chia WN, Paitoonpong L, Tan CW, Suwanpimolkul G,
et al . 2021. Early detection of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients in Thailand.PLoS One 16 : e0246864. - Lopez CE, Legge KL. 2020. Influenza A virus vaccination: immunity, protection, and recent advances toward a universal vaccine.
Vaccines 8 : 434. - Fukuyama Y, Tokuhara D, Kataoka K, Gilbert RS, McGhee JR, Yuki Y,
et al . 2012. Novel vaccine development strategies for inducing mucosal immunity.Expe. Rev. Vaccines 11 : 367-379. - Muñoz-Provencio D, Llopis M, Antolín M, De Torres I, Guarner F, Pérez-Martínez G,
et al . 2009. Adhesion properties ofLactobacillus casei strains to resected intestinal fragments and components of the extracellular matrix.Arch. Microbiol. 191 : 153-161. - Christensen HR, Frøkiær H, Pestka JJ. 2002. Lactobacilli differentially modulate expression of cytokines and maturation surface markers in murine dendritic cells.
J. Immunol. 168 : 171-178. - D'Arienzo R, Maurano F, Luongo D, Mazzarella G, Stefanile R, Troncone R,
et al . 2008. Adjuvant effect ofLactobacillus casei in a mouse model of gluten sensitivity.Immunol. Lett. 119 : 78-83. - Mohamadzadeh M, Olson S, Kalina WV, Ruthel G, Demmin GL, Warfield KL,
et al . 2005.Lactobacilli activate human dendritic cells that skew T cells toward T helper 1 polarization.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102 : 2880-2885. - Pouwels PH, Leer RJ, Shaw M, den Bak-Glashouwer M-JH, Tielen FD, Smit E,
et al . 1998. Lactic acid bacteria as antigen delivery vehicles for oral immunization purposes.Int. J. Food Microbiol. 41 : 155-167. - Lee SY, Choi JH, Xu Z. 2003. Microbial cell-surface display.
Trends Biotechnol. 21 : 45-52. - Russell CJ, Hu M, Okda FA. 2018. Influenza hemagglutinin protein stability, activation, and pandemic risk.
Trends Microbiol. 26 : 841-853. - Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. 2000. Receptor binding and membrane fusion in virus entry: the influenza hemagglutinin.
Ann. Rev. Biochemy. 69 : 531-569. - Wiley DC, Skehel JJ. 1987. The structure and function of the hemagglutinin membrane glycoprotein of influenza virus.
Annu. Rev. Biochemy. 56 : 365-394. - Gerhard W, Yewdell J, Frankel ME, Webster R. 1981. Antigenic structure of influenza virus haemagglutinin defined by hybridoma antibodies.
Nature 290 : 713-717. - Zhang Y, Yang L, Zhang J, Huang K, Sun X, Yang Y,
et al . 2022. Oral or intranasal immunization with recombinantLactobacillus plantarum displaying head domain of Swine Influenza A virus hemagglutinin protects mice from H1N1 virus.Microb. Cell. Fact. 21 : 185. - Lei H, Sheng Z, Ding Q, Chen J, Wei X, Lam DM-K,
et al . 2011. Evaluation of oral immunization with recombinant avian influenza virus HA1 displayed on the Lactococcus lactis surface and combined with the mucosal adjuvant cholera toxin subunit B.Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 18 : 1046-1051. - Rosenbaum P, Tchitchek N, Joly C, Rodriguez Pozo A, Stimmer L, Langlois S,
et al . 2021. Vaccine inoculation route modulates early immunity and consequently antigen-specific immune response.Front. Immunol. 12 : 645210. - Wang Z, Yu Q, Gao J, Yang Q. 2012. Mucosal and systemic immune responses induced by recombinant Lactobacillus spp. expressing the hemagglutinin of the avian influenza virus H5N1.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 19 : 174-179. - Vissers YM, Snel J, Zuurendonk PF, Smit BA, Wichers HJ, Savelkoul HF. 2010. Differential effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus and
Lactobacillus plantarum strains on cytokine induction in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 59 : 60-70. - Wiley JA, Tighe MP, Harmsen AG. 2005. Upper respiratory tract resistance to influenza infection is not prevented by the absence of either nasal-associated lymphoid tissue or cervical lymph nodes.
J. Immunol. 175 : 3186-3196. - de Pinho Favaro MT, Atienza-Garriga J, Martínez-Torró C, Parladé E, Vázquez E, Corchero JL,
et al . 2022. Recombinant vaccines in 2022: a perspective from the cell factory.Microb. Cell Fact. 21 : 1-17. - Singh SK, Roeffen W, Mistarz UH, Chourasia BK, Yang F, Rand KD,
et al . 2017. Construct design, production, and characterization ofPlasmodium falciparum 48/45 R0. 6C subunit protein produced inLactococcus lactis as candidate vaccine.Microb. Cell Fact. 16 : 1-11. - LeCureux JS, Dean GA. 2018. Lactobacillus mucosal vaccine vectors: immune responses against bacterial and viral antigens.
Msphere. 3 : 10.1128/msphere.00061-00018. - Shirdast H, Ebrahimzadeh F, Taromchi AH, Mortazavi Y, Esmaeilzadeh A, Sekhavati MH,
et al . 2021. RecombinantLactococcus lactis dsplaying Omp31 antigen ofBrucella melitensis can induce an immunogenic response in BALB/c Mice.Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 13 : 80-89. - Detmer A, Glenting J. 2006. Live bacterial vaccines-a review and identification of potential hazards.
Microb. Cell Fact. 5 : 1-12.
Related articles in JMB
Article
Research article
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024; 34(3): 735-745
Published online March 28, 2024 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2307.07040
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Mucosal Administration of Lactobacillus casei Surface-Displayed HA1 Induces Protective Immune Responses against Avian Influenza A Virus in Mice
Dung T. Huynh†, W.A. Gayan Chathuranga†, Kiramage Chathuranga, Jong-Soo Lee*, and Chul-Joong Kim*
College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34314, Republic of Korea
Correspondence to:Jong-Soo Lee, jongsool@cnu.ac.kr
Chul-Joong Kim, cjkim@cnu.ac.kr
†These authors contributed equally to the study
Abstract
Avian influenza is a serious threat to both public health and the poultry industry worldwide. This respiratory virus can be combated by eliciting robust immune responses at the site of infection through mucosal immunization. Recombinant probiotics, specifically lactic acid bacteria, are safe and effective carriers for mucosal vaccines. In this study, we engineered recombinant fusion protein by fusing the hemagglutinin 1 (HA1) subunit of the A/Aquatic bird/Korea/W81/2005 (H5N2) with the Bacillus subtilis poly γ-glutamic acid synthetase A (pgsA) at the surface of Lactobacillus casei (pgsA-HA1/L. casei). Using subcellular fractionation and flow cytometry we confirmed the surface localization of this fusion protein. Mucosal administration of pgsA-HA1/L. casei in mice resulted in significant levels of HA1-specific serum IgG, mucosal IgA and neutralizing antibodies against the H5N2 virus. Additionally, pgsA-HA1/L. casei-induced systemic and local cell-mediated immune responses specific to HA1, as evidenced by an increased number of IFN-γ and IL-4 secreting cells in the spleens and higher levels of IL-4 in the local lymphocyte supernatants. Finally, mice inoculated with pgsA-HA1/L. casei were protected against a 10LD50 dose of the homologous mouse-adapted H5N2 virus. These results suggest that mucosal immunization with L. casei displaying HA1 on its surface could be a potential strategy for developing a mucosal vaccine against other H5 subtype viruses.
Keywords: Avian influenza, HA1, Lactobacillus casei, poly &gamma,-glutamic acid synthetase A, surface display, mucosal delivery
Introduction
Avian influenza (AI), caused by AI viruses (AIVs) from
HPAIVs of the H5 subtype, derived from the A/Goose/Guangdong/1/1996 (H5N1) lineage, known as H5Nx viruses, have become a growing concern due to their increasing prevalence and their potential to cause human infections [9]. These viruses have evolved into ten genetic clades [10]. Among the ten clades, clade-2 viruses are successively dominant and endemic in many countries [11]. Outbreaks of H5N5 and H5N2 HPAIVs have been reported in Asia, Europe, and North America since 2008 [12-15]. In addition, H5N8 viruses from clade 2.3.4.4 were primarily reported in Korea in early 2014 and spread globally in many countries [16]. In 2014, a novel H5N6 reassortant-caused human infection was first reported in China [17]. The recurrence of H5N2 LPAIV raises concerns about the exchange of genetic characteristics between divergent isolates [18-20]. Although H5Nx viruses are currently unable to efficiently transmit among humans [21, 22], their continued evolution and lack of population-level immunity make them a potential pandemic threat [23]. Therefore, the development of an effective H5 subtype AI vaccine is urgently needed.
The respiratory tract mucosa serves as the site of entry and replication of the AI virus as well as the front line of defense against infections [24]. However, current parenteral AI vaccine modalities generally fail to induce local immune responses [25, 26], which is why mucosally administered vaccines are more effective [27]. These mucosal vaccines can elicit both local and systemic immunity but, local barriers remain a bottleneck of antigen uptake by microfold cells and professional antigen-presenting cells [28]. To overcome this issue, it is necessary to investigate safer and more efficient mucosal vaccine carriers for clinical use [29].
In previous studies, we successfully engineered the
In this study, we selected the HA1 domain (residues 17 to 330) of A/aquatic bird/Korea/W81/2005(H5N2) as a representative immunogen for AI H5 subtypes and investigated the immunogenicity of HA1 which was displayed on the surface of
Materials and Methods
pgsA-HA1/L. casei Construction and Expression
The plasmid encoding the H5N2/HA sequence was kindly provided by Dr. Young-Ki Choi (Chungbuk National University, South Korea). The plasmid pKV-Pald-PgsA, harboring the pgsA genes of
The plasmids pKV-Pald-pgsA (empty plasmid) and pKV-Pald-pgsA-HA1 were introduced into
To perform fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), recombinant
Mouse Experimental Schedule, Sample Collection, and Virus Challenge
Specific pathogen-free female BALB/c mice (6-week age) were purchased from Samtako (South Korea) and maintained in a ventilated milieu with ad libitum access to water and food. The room was maintained at a temperature of 18-23°C, relative humidity of 50-60%, and a 12 h light/dark cycle. All mice were allowed to acclimate for 7 days before the start of the experiment. All experiments were conducted under appropriate conditions with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chungnam National University (approval number CNU-00432). In all intranasal immunization and challenge experiments, mice were anesthetized with intraperitoneal administration of avertin (2.5%) at a dosage of 0.015 ml/g bodyweight.
The study consisted of two sets of mice, one for oral and one for intranasal immunization. Each set was divided into three experimental groups, consisting of 19 mice (eight for characterization of humoral and cellular immune responses, five for survival analysis and six for lung virus titers at 3 and 5 days post-challenge (dpc). The mice were immunized with pgsA-HA1/
Spleens, cervical lymph nodes, mesenteric LNs and Peyer’s patches LNs were aseptically collected on day 28 and stored in RPMI media (PAN Biotech, Germany). All tissue samples were separated through a 70 μm cell strainer filter (SPL Life science, South Korea), and lymphocytes from cervical, mesenteric and Peyer’s patches LNs were kept on ice. Splenocytes from the spleens were harvested after the lysis of red blood cells with ammonium-chloride-potassium buffer. The cells were then suspended in complete RPMI media containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) with 1% antimycotic and antibiotic (Gibco, USA). A synthetic peptide containing the conserved epitope of H5-subtype hemagglutinin (CNTKCQTPMGAINSS) [41] was synthesized by Peptron Inc. (South Korea). This synthetic peptide was used for in vitro re-stimulation assays at a concentration of 5 μg/well.
To assess the protective efficacy of the pgsA-HA1/
ELISA
Antibodies specific to HA1 were determined using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). To coat the 96-well immunosorbent plates (Corning, USA), the above synthetic peptide (500 ng/well) was added and allowed to incubate overnight at 4°C. Following, 2 h of blocking at RT with 10% skim. Serum (1:50) or supernatants of homogenized tissues or feces (1:200) were added to the plates and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. The plates were then incubated with secondary HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG, -IgG1, IgG2a, -IgA antibodies (diluted 1:3000; Sigma, USA) for 2 h at 37°C. The plates were then incubated in the dark for 10 min with a mixed substrate solution of 3,3’,5,5’-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) and H2O2. Finally, the reaction was stopped by adding 2N-H2SO4, and optical density values at 450 nm wavelength were measured with an Apollo ELISA Reader (Berthold technologies, Germany).
Sandwich ELISA was used to evaluate the levels of antigen-specific interleukin-4 (IL-4) secretion in the local LNs. For the in vitro stimulation assay, 1 × 106 lymphocytes from cervical, mesenteric and Peyer’s patches LNs were incubated with the above synthetic peptide in complete RPMI media at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 72 h. The culture supernatants were collected, centrifuged and stored at -20°C for further analysis. The production of IL-4 was measured using a cytokine ELISA kit (BD Biosciences, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions.
ELISPOT
The HA1specific cellular immune responses were evaluated by using an ELISPOT assay with the mouse IFN-γ ELISPOT set and mouse IL-4 ELISPOT set according to the manufacturers’ specifications (BD Bioscience, USA). First, 96-well ELISPOT plates were coated with anti-mouse IFN-γ or anti-IL-4 capture antibodies (5 μg/ml) in PBS and incubated at 4°C overnight. Then plates were blocked for 2 h at RT with 200 μl/well complete RPMI media. Next, 1 × 106 splenocytes were added to each well and incubated for 48 h at 37°C with 5% CO2 in complete RPMI media containing the above synthetic peptide (5 μg/well), complete RPMI media (negative control) or RPMI media with 5 μg/ml phytohaemagglutinin (positive control) (Invitrogen, USA). The cells were then discarded from the plates and treated with biotinylated anti-mouse IFN-γ and IL-4 antibodies, streptavidin HRP and AEC substrate solution. The substrate reaction was terminated by washing with deionized water. Finally, the spots were enumerated using the CTL-Immunospot S5 UV analyzer (Cellular Technologies, USA).
Lung Virus Titer
The lungs were aseptically collected to determine virus titers using 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) as previously described [35]. In brief, lung tissues were homogenized in sterilized PBS containing 1% antibiotic and antimycotic solution, followed by centrifugation (12,000 ×
Serum Neutralization Test
The level of H5N2-specific neutralizing antibodies in sera was determined by conducting a serum neutralization test with modification to the protocol described previously [43]. In 96-well microliter plates, 50 μl of 2-fold serial dilution of receptor-destroying enzyme (Denka Seiken, Japan) was treated and then inactivated serum at 56°C for 30 min in FBS free DMEM was mixed with 50 μl of 100 TCID50 of Vero cell adapted H5N2 virus. This mixture was then incubated at 37°C for 1h, 5 × 103/100 μl of Vero cells were added to each well, and the plates were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 4 days. The virus-induced cytopathic effect was examined and the reciprocal of the highest serum dilution at which cytopathic effect could be observed was used to determine the neutralizing antibody titers.
Statistical Analysis
The results are reported as the mean values with standard deviations (S.D.). Discrepancies between groups were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test. Survival rates were compared using the log-rank test, using GraphPad Prism 6 software. The threshold for statistically significance was set at
Results
Construction, Expression and Surface Localization of pgsA-HA1
Initially, we constructed a pKV-Pald-pgsA-HA1 plasmid containing a fusion gene of pgsA-HA1 (Fig. 1A).
-
Figure 1. Antigen construction and expression.
(A) Schematic depiction of the pKV-Pald-pgsA-HA1 plasmid. (B) The immunoblotting of the fractionated recombinant
L. casei , pgsA/L. casei and pgsA-HA1/L. casei using anti-pgsA and anti-H5N2 polyclonal antibodies. Lanes 1, 2, and 3 illustratedL. casei , pgsA/L. casei and pgsA-HA1/L. casei , respectively. (C) FACS analysis. The recombinant pgsA/L. casei and pgsA-HA1/L. casei cells were probed with mouse anti-H5N2 antibody, followed by Cy3-conjugated donkey mouse anti-IgG antibody.
Upon proper localization to the
Recombinant pgsA-HA1/L. casei Induced systemic and local humoral immune responses
To assess the humoral immune responses of pgsA-HA1/
-
Figure 2. Evaluation of the antigen-specific humoral immune responses induced by pgsA-HA1/
L. casei . Mice were grouped as mentioned in materials and methods, then immunized at days 0 to 2, 7 to 9, and 21 to 23 orally and intranasally. Blood and feces samples were collected on days -1, 14, and 28. Lung and small intestine samples were collected on day 28 after immunization. Induction of HA1-specific humoral immune responses by mucosal immunization of pgsA-HA1/L. casei were determined by indirect ELISA and virus neutralization assay. (A) Schematic depiction of mouse experiment strategy. (B) HA1- specific serum IgG titers (left panel) and fecal IgA titers (right panel) in the orally immunized groups. (C) Similarly, in the intranasally immunized groups, HA1-specific serum IgG titers (left panel) and fecal IgA titers (right panel). (D) HA1-specific IgA titers in the lungs (left panel) and the small intestines (right panel) in the orally immunized groups. (E) Similarly, HA1- specific IgA titers in the lungs (left panel) and the small intestines (right panel) in the intranasally immunized groups. (F) HA1- specific IgG1 and IgG2a titers in the orally immunized groups. (G) Reciprocals of virus-neutralizing antibody titers specific to the H5N2 virus in the orally immunized groups. (H) HA1-specific IgG1 and IgG2a titers in the intranasally immunized groups. (I) Reciprocals of virus-neutralizing antibody titers specific to the H5N2 virus in the intranasally immunized groups. The bars denote the means ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test., *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
To further analyze the antigen-specific systemic humoral immune responses induced by pgsA-HA1/
pgsA-HA1/L. casei Enhanced H5N2 Specific Virus-Neutralizing Antibodies
Virus-neutralizing activity is a direct and sensitive measure for functional antibodies [45]. To examine whether the pgsA-HA1/
pgsA-HA1/L. casei Induces Potential HA1-Specific Cellular Immune Response
In addition to humoral immune responses, cellular immune responses are also important for influenza clearing [46]. In this study, mice were immunized through oral and intranasal routes per the specific scheme (Fig. 3A). To evaluate potential antigen-specific T cell responses, in vitro lymphocyte restimulation assays were conducted using cells from cervical, mesenteric and Peyer’s patches LNs on day 28 after immunization. The mesenteric and Peyer’s patches LN cells were isolated from the mice orally inoculated with pgsA-HA1/
-
Figure 3. Evaluation of potential antigen-specific cellular immune responses induced by pgsA-HA1/
L. casei . Mice were grouped as mentioned in materials and methods, then immunized at days 0 to 2, 7 to 9, and 21 to 23 orally and intranasally. Local LNs and spleen lymphocytes were collected on day 28 after immunization. Induction of potential HA1- specific cellular immune responses by mucosal immunization of pgsA-HA1/L. casei was determined by cytokine ELISA and ELISPOT assays. (A) Schematic depiction of mouse experiment strategy. (B) HA1-protein specific interleukin-4 (IL-4) production by mesenteric and Peyer’s patches LN lymphocytes (1 × 106 cells) in the orally immunized groups by ELISA. (C) HA1-specific interleukin-4 (IL-4) production by cervical and mesenteric LN lymphocytes (1 × 106 cells) in the intranasally immunized groups by ELISA. (D) and (E) HA1-specific IL-4 spots forming splenic lymphocytes (1 × 106 cells) in the orally and intranasally immunized groups by ELISPOT, respectively. (F) and (G) HA1- specific interferon-γ (IFN-γ) spots forming splenic lymphocytes (1 × 106 cells) in the orally and intranasally immunized groups by ELISPOT, respectively. PHA: Phytohaemagglutinin. The bars denote the means ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test., *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Furthermore, cellular immune responses to pgsA-HA1/
-
Figure 4. Protective efficacy of the pgsA-HA1/
L. casei against lethal H5N2 infection. Mice were grouped as mentioned in materials and methods, then immunized at days 0 to 2, 7 to 9, and 21 to 23 orally and intranasally. Mice were intranasally challenged with 10LD50 of mouse-adapted A/Aquatic bird/Korea/W81/2005 (H5N2). After the challenge, changes in body weight and proportion of survival were monitored for 12 days. Lungs were aseptically collected on days 3 and 5 postchallenge; virus titers in the lung tissues were investigated by TCID50 in MDCK cells following the infection with H5N2. (A) Schematic depiction of mouse experiment strategy. (B) and (C) Changes in body weight and (D) and (E) survival rates of orally and intranasally immunized groups, respectively. (F) and (G) Virus titers in the lung tissues in orally and intranasally immunized groups, respectively. The bars denote the means ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test., **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Mucosal Immunization of pgsA-HA1/L. casei Showed Protection against Lethal H5N2 Virus Challenge
Given that pgsA-HA1/
Immunization with pgsA-HA1/L. casei Reduced Lung Virus Titers after H5N2 Challenge
Viral load in the lungs after infection is a reliable indicator of vaccine protection efficacy. The viral load in the lungs was quantified using the TCID50 method. pgsA-
Discussion
Mucosal immunity plays a significant role in defense against influenza virus infections, and the induction of effective mucosal immune response is the primary objective of vaccination. However, mucosal barriers typically respond to exogenous antigens with tolerance instead of immune activation, making it difficult to elicit local immune responses through immunization. Consequently, significant efforts have focused on developing potential adjuvants and vaccine delivery vectors for mucosal application in order to overcome these challenges [47].
Recombinant lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are increasingly being used as a potential carrier for mucosal vaccine delivery due to their ability to adhere to mucosa surface [5, 36, 48], intrinsic immunomodulatory properties [49-52], and feasibility in displaying heterologous antigens on the surface [33, 34, 36]. The display of heterologous antigens on the bacterial surface is usually achieved by genetic fusion with a bacterial transmembrane anchoring protein [53]. In this study, we explored the potency of recombinant
HA is a classical type I membrane glycoprotein that plays key roles in viral adsorption and membrane fusion. This protein stimulates the production of functional antibodies and is the primary antigen in many preclinical studies [54]. During virus replication, the HA protein is initially translated as a single polypeptide precursor (HA0), which is later cleaved by host trypsin-like proteases into two subunits, HA1 and HA2 [55]. The HA1 subunit forms a membrane-distal globular head that contains the receptor-binding domain (RBD), and most of the antigenic regions are recognized by neutralizing antibodies [56, 57]. In this study, we proved that oral or intranasal administration of recombinant pgsA-HA1/
The route of vaccine administration is an important parameter that, can significantly affect the quality and quantity of the immune responses [60]. In this study, mucosal administration with recombinant
Antigen-induced cell-mediated immune responses are essential for host protection against AIV infection. Lactobacilli have been shown to promote the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL‐6, IL‐12, and TNF‐α, which further stimulate NK cells to secrete IFN‐γ to enhance cytotoxic CD8 T lymphocyte (CTL) responses [62]. Our data suggest that intranasal inoculation of pgsA-HA1/
In summary, our findings revealed that administering recombinant pgsA-HA1/
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Chungnam National University
The authors thank Dr. Y.K. Choi (Chungbuk National University, South Korea) for providing H5N2/HA sequence-bearing plasmid and mouse-adapted A/Aquatic bird/Korea/W81/2005(H5N2) virus.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: J.-S.L., and C.J.K.; Methodology: C.J.K., J.-S.L., D.T.H. and W.A.G.C.; Formal Analysis: D.T.H., W.A.G.C., and K.C.; Investigation: D.T.H., W.A.G.C., K.C., J.-S.L., and C.J.K.; Writing (original draft preparation): D.T.H. and W.A.G.C.; Writing (review and editing): C.J.K. and J.-S.L.; Data curation: D.T.H., W.A.G.C., K.C., J.-S.L., and C.J.K.; Validation: D.T.H., W.A.G.C., K.C., J.-S.L., and C.J.K.; Visualization D.T.H., W.A.G.C. and J.-S.L.; Supervision and Funding Acquisition: J.-S.L., and C.J.K..
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
Fig 1.
Fig 2.
Fig 3.
Fig 4.
References
- Selleck P, Kirkland P. Avian influenza, Australia: Australian and New Zealand standard diagnostic procedures for animal diseases, Sub-Committee on Animal Health Laboratory Standards for Animal Health Committee; 2009. http://www.scahls.org.au. cited 2010 Feb 14.
- Blagodatski A, Trutneva K, Glazova O, Mityaeva O, Shevkova L, Kegeles E,
et al . 2021. Avian influenza in wild birds and poultry: Dissemination pathways, monitoring methods, and virus ecology.Pathogens 10 : 630. - Shirvani E, Varghese BP, Paldurai A, Samal SK. 2020. A recombinant avian paramyxovirus serotype 3 expressing the hemagglutinin protein protects chickens against H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus challenge.
Sci. Rep. 10 : 2221. - Byrne AM, Reid SM, Seekings AH, Núñez A, Obeso Prieto AB, Ridout S,
et al . 2021. H7N7 avian influenza virus mutation from low to high pathogenicity on a layer chicken farm in the UK.Viruses 13 : 259. - Seekings A, Slomka M, Russell C, Howard W, Choudhury B, Nunez A,
et al . 2018. Direct evidence of H7N7 avian influenza virus mutation from low to high virulence on a single poultry premises during an outbreak in free range chickens in the UK, 2008.Infect. Genet. Evol. 64 : 13-31. - Laleye AT, Abolnik C. 2020. Emergence of highly pathogenic H5N2 and H7N1 influenza A viruses from low pathogenic precursors by serial passage in ovo.
PLoS One 15 : e0240290. - Dhingra MS, Artois J, Dellicour S, Lemey P, Dauphin G, Von Dobschuetz S,
et al . 2018. Geographical and historical patterns in the emergences of novel highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5 and H7 viruses in poultry.Front. Vet. Sci. 5 : 84. - Lee YN, Lee DH, Cheon SH, Park YR, Baek YG, Si YJ,
et al . 2020. Genetic characteristics and pathogenesis of H5 low pathogenic avian influenza viruses from wild birds and domestic ducks in South Korea.Sci. Rep. 10 : 12151. - Taubenberger J, Morens D. 2009. Pandemic influenza-including a risk assessment of H5N1.
Rev. Sci. Tech. 28 : 187-202. - Cui J, Qu N, Guo Y, Cao L, Wu S, Mei K,
et al . 2017. Phylogeny, pathogenicity, and transmission of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in chickens.Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 7 : 328. - Jang Y, Seo SH. 2022. H5 cleavage-site peptide vaccine protects chickens from lethal infection by highly pathogenic H5 avian influenza viruses.
Arch. Virol. 167 : 67-75. - Liang WS, He YC, Wu HD, Li YT, Shih TH, Kao GS,
et al . 2020. Ecological factors associated with persistent circulation of multiple highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses among poultry farms in Taiwan during 2015-17.PLoS One 15 : e0236581. - Spackman E, Prosser DJ, Pantin-Jackwood M, Stephens CB, Berlin AM. 2019. Clade 2.3. 4.4 H5 north american highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses infect, but do not cause clinical signs in, American Black Ducks (
Anas rubripes ).Avian Dis. 63 : 366-370. - Marchenko V, Goncharova N, Susloparov I, Kolosova N, Gudymo A, Svyatchenko S,
et al . 2018. Isolation and characterization of H5Nx highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses of clade 2.3. 4.4 in Russia.Virology 525 : 216-223. - Zhao K, Gu M, Zhong L, Duan Z, Zhang Y, Zhu Y,
et al . 2013. Characterization of three H5N5 and one H5N8 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in China.Vet. Microbiol. 163 : 351-357. - Lee YJ, Kang HM, Lee EK, Song BM, Jeong J, Kwon YK,
et al . 2014. Novel reassortant influenza A (H5N8) viruses, South Korea, 2014.Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20 : 1087-1089. - Pan M, Gao R, Lv Q, Huang S, Zhou Z, Yang L,
et al . 2016. Human infection with a novel, highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N6) virus: virological and clinical findings.J. Infect. 72 : 52-59. - Lee JH, Pascua PNQ, Song MS, Baek YH, Kim CJ, Choi HW,
et al . 2009. Isolation and genetic characterization of H5N2 influenza viruses from pigs in Korea.J. Virol. 83 : 4205-4215. - Choi WS, Baek YH, Kwon JJ, Jeong JH, Park SJ, Kim YI,
et al . 2017. Rapid acquisition of polymorphic virulence markers during adaptation of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N8 virus in the mouse.Sci. Rep. 7 : 40667. - Lee DH, Song CS. 2013. H9N2 avian influenza virus in Korea: evolution and vaccination.
Clin. Exper. Vaccine Res. 2 : 26-33. - Bridges CB, Katz JM, Seto WH, Chan PK, Tsang D, Ho W,
et al . 2000. Risk of influenza A (H5N1) infection among health care workers exposed to patients with influenza A (H5N1), Hong Kong.J. Infect. Dis. 181 : 344-348. - Ungchusak K, Auewarakul P, Dowell SF, Kitphati R, Auwanit W, Puthavathana P,
et al . 2005. Probable person-to-person transmission of avian influenza A (H5N1).New England J. Med. 352 : 333-340. - Webster RG, Govorkova EA. 2006. H5N1 influenza-continuing evolution and spread.
New Eng. J. Med. 355 : 2174-2177. - Denney L, Ho L-P. 2018. The role of respiratory epithelium in host defence against influenza virus infection.
Biomed. J. 41 : 218-233. - Brokstad KA, Eriksson J-C, Cox RJ, Tynning T, Olofsson J, Jonsson R,
et al . 2002. Parenteral vaccination against influenza does not induce a local antigen-specific immune response in the nasal mucosa.J. Infect. Dis. 185 : 878-884. - Liu H, Patil HP, de Vries-Idema J, Wilschut J, Huckriede A. 2013. Evaluation of mucosal and systemic immune responses elicited by GPI-0100-adjuvanted influenza vaccine delivered by different immunization strategies.
PLoS One 8 : e69649. - Kim L, Martinez CJ, Hodgson KA, Trager GR, Brandl JR, Sandefer EP,
et al . 2016. Systemic and mucosal immune responses following oral adenoviral delivery of influenza vaccine to the human intestine by radio controlled capsule.Sci. Rep. 6 : 37295. - Baker JR Jr, Farazuddin M, Wong PT, O'Konek JJ. 2022. The unfulfilled potential of mucosal immunization.
J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 150 : 1-11. - Calzas C, Chevalier C. 2019. Innovative mucosal vaccine formulations against influenza A virus infections.
Front. Immunol. 10 : 1605. - Kikuchi Y, Kunitoh-Asari A, Hayakawa K, Imai S, Kasuya K, Abe K,
et al . 2014. Oral administration ofLactobacillus plantarum strain AYA enhances IgA secretion and provides survival protection against influenza virus infection in mice.PLoS One 9 : e86416. - Lee YN, Youn HN, Kwon JH, Lee DH, Park JK, Yuk SS,
et al . 2013. Sublingual administration ofLactobacillus rhamnosus affects respiratory immune responses and facilitates protection against influenza virus infection in mice.Antiviral Res. 98 : 284-290. - Wang Z, Yu Q, Fu J, Liang J, Yang Q. 2013. Immune responses of chickens inoculated with recombinant L actobacillus expressing the haemagglutinin of the avian influenza virus.
J. Appl. Microbiol. 115 : 1269-1277. - Poo H, Pyo HM, Lee TY, Yoon SW, Lee JS, Kim CJ,
et al . 2006. Oral administration of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 displayed onLactobacillus casei induces E7‐specific antitumor effects in C57/BL6 mice.Int. J. Cancer 119 : 1702-1709. - Lee JS, Poo H, Han DP, Hong SP, Kim K, Cho MW,
et al . 2006. Mucosal immunization with surface-displayed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein onLactobacillus casei induces neutralizing antibodies in mice.J. Virol. 80 : 4079-4087. - Li R, Chowdhury MY, Kim JH, Kim TH, Pathinayake P, Koo WS,
et al . 2015. Mucosally administered Lactobacillus surface-displayed influenza antigens (sM2 and HA2) with cholera toxin subunit A1 (CTA1) Induce broadly protective immune responses against divergent influenza subtypes.Vet. Microbiol. 179 : 250-263. - Chowdhury MY, Li R, Kim JH, Park ME, Kim TH, Pathinayake P,
et al . 2014. Mucosal vaccination with recombinantLactobacillus casei -displayed CTA1-conjugated consensus matrix protein-2 (sM2) induces broad protection against divergent influenza subtypes in BALB/c mice.PLoS One 9 : e94051. - Zhang N, Zheng BJ, Lu L, Zhou Y, Jiang S, Du L. 2015. Advancements in the development of subunit influenza vaccines.
Microb. Infect. 17 : 123-134. - Khurana S, Verma S, Verma N, Crevar CJ, Carter DM, Manischewitz J,
et al . 2011. Bacterial HA1 vaccine against pandemic H5N1 influenza virus: evidence of oligomerization, hemagglutination, and cross-protective immunity in ferrets.J. Virol. 85 : 1246-1256. - Du L, Zhao G, Sun S, Zhang X, Zhou X, Guo Y,
et al . 2013. A critical HA1 neutralizing domain of H5N1 influenza in an optimal conformation induces strong cross-protection.PLoS One 8 : e53568. - Palomino MM, Allievi MC, Prado-Acosta M, Sanchez-Rivas C, Ruzal SM. 2010. New method for electroporation of
Lactobacillus species grown in high salt.J. Microbiol. Methods 83 : 164-167. - Velumani S, Ho HT, He F, Musthaq S, Prabakaran M, Kwang J. 2011. A novel peptide ELISA for universal detection of antibodies to human H5N1 influenza viruses.
PLoS One 6 : e20737. - Reed LJ, Muench H. 1938. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints.
Am. J. Epidemiol. 27 : 493-497. - Gross FL, Bai Y, Jefferson S, Holiday C, Levine MZ. 2017. Measuring influenza neutralizing antibody responses to A (H3N2) viruses in human sera by microneutralization assays using MDCK-SIAT1 cells.
J. Vis. Exp. 129 : 56448. - van Riet E, Ainai A, Suzuki T, Hasegawa H. 2012. Mucosal IgA responses in influenza virus infections; thoughts for vaccine design.
Vaccine 30 : 5893-5900. - Putcharoen O, Wacharapluesadee S, Chia WN, Paitoonpong L, Tan CW, Suwanpimolkul G,
et al . 2021. Early detection of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients in Thailand.PLoS One 16 : e0246864. - Lopez CE, Legge KL. 2020. Influenza A virus vaccination: immunity, protection, and recent advances toward a universal vaccine.
Vaccines 8 : 434. - Fukuyama Y, Tokuhara D, Kataoka K, Gilbert RS, McGhee JR, Yuki Y,
et al . 2012. Novel vaccine development strategies for inducing mucosal immunity.Expe. Rev. Vaccines 11 : 367-379. - Muñoz-Provencio D, Llopis M, Antolín M, De Torres I, Guarner F, Pérez-Martínez G,
et al . 2009. Adhesion properties ofLactobacillus casei strains to resected intestinal fragments and components of the extracellular matrix.Arch. Microbiol. 191 : 153-161. - Christensen HR, Frøkiær H, Pestka JJ. 2002. Lactobacilli differentially modulate expression of cytokines and maturation surface markers in murine dendritic cells.
J. Immunol. 168 : 171-178. - D'Arienzo R, Maurano F, Luongo D, Mazzarella G, Stefanile R, Troncone R,
et al . 2008. Adjuvant effect ofLactobacillus casei in a mouse model of gluten sensitivity.Immunol. Lett. 119 : 78-83. - Mohamadzadeh M, Olson S, Kalina WV, Ruthel G, Demmin GL, Warfield KL,
et al . 2005.Lactobacilli activate human dendritic cells that skew T cells toward T helper 1 polarization.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102 : 2880-2885. - Pouwels PH, Leer RJ, Shaw M, den Bak-Glashouwer M-JH, Tielen FD, Smit E,
et al . 1998. Lactic acid bacteria as antigen delivery vehicles for oral immunization purposes.Int. J. Food Microbiol. 41 : 155-167. - Lee SY, Choi JH, Xu Z. 2003. Microbial cell-surface display.
Trends Biotechnol. 21 : 45-52. - Russell CJ, Hu M, Okda FA. 2018. Influenza hemagglutinin protein stability, activation, and pandemic risk.
Trends Microbiol. 26 : 841-853. - Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. 2000. Receptor binding and membrane fusion in virus entry: the influenza hemagglutinin.
Ann. Rev. Biochemy. 69 : 531-569. - Wiley DC, Skehel JJ. 1987. The structure and function of the hemagglutinin membrane glycoprotein of influenza virus.
Annu. Rev. Biochemy. 56 : 365-394. - Gerhard W, Yewdell J, Frankel ME, Webster R. 1981. Antigenic structure of influenza virus haemagglutinin defined by hybridoma antibodies.
Nature 290 : 713-717. - Zhang Y, Yang L, Zhang J, Huang K, Sun X, Yang Y,
et al . 2022. Oral or intranasal immunization with recombinantLactobacillus plantarum displaying head domain of Swine Influenza A virus hemagglutinin protects mice from H1N1 virus.Microb. Cell. Fact. 21 : 185. - Lei H, Sheng Z, Ding Q, Chen J, Wei X, Lam DM-K,
et al . 2011. Evaluation of oral immunization with recombinant avian influenza virus HA1 displayed on the Lactococcus lactis surface and combined with the mucosal adjuvant cholera toxin subunit B.Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 18 : 1046-1051. - Rosenbaum P, Tchitchek N, Joly C, Rodriguez Pozo A, Stimmer L, Langlois S,
et al . 2021. Vaccine inoculation route modulates early immunity and consequently antigen-specific immune response.Front. Immunol. 12 : 645210. - Wang Z, Yu Q, Gao J, Yang Q. 2012. Mucosal and systemic immune responses induced by recombinant Lactobacillus spp. expressing the hemagglutinin of the avian influenza virus H5N1.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 19 : 174-179. - Vissers YM, Snel J, Zuurendonk PF, Smit BA, Wichers HJ, Savelkoul HF. 2010. Differential effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus and
Lactobacillus plantarum strains on cytokine induction in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 59 : 60-70. - Wiley JA, Tighe MP, Harmsen AG. 2005. Upper respiratory tract resistance to influenza infection is not prevented by the absence of either nasal-associated lymphoid tissue or cervical lymph nodes.
J. Immunol. 175 : 3186-3196. - de Pinho Favaro MT, Atienza-Garriga J, Martínez-Torró C, Parladé E, Vázquez E, Corchero JL,
et al . 2022. Recombinant vaccines in 2022: a perspective from the cell factory.Microb. Cell Fact. 21 : 1-17. - Singh SK, Roeffen W, Mistarz UH, Chourasia BK, Yang F, Rand KD,
et al . 2017. Construct design, production, and characterization ofPlasmodium falciparum 48/45 R0. 6C subunit protein produced inLactococcus lactis as candidate vaccine.Microb. Cell Fact. 16 : 1-11. - LeCureux JS, Dean GA. 2018. Lactobacillus mucosal vaccine vectors: immune responses against bacterial and viral antigens.
Msphere. 3 : 10.1128/msphere.00061-00018. - Shirdast H, Ebrahimzadeh F, Taromchi AH, Mortazavi Y, Esmaeilzadeh A, Sekhavati MH,
et al . 2021. RecombinantLactococcus lactis dsplaying Omp31 antigen ofBrucella melitensis can induce an immunogenic response in BALB/c Mice.Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 13 : 80-89. - Detmer A, Glenting J. 2006. Live bacterial vaccines-a review and identification of potential hazards.
Microb. Cell Fact. 5 : 1-12.