전체메뉴
검색
Article Search

JMB Journal of Microbiolog and Biotechnology

QR Code QR Code

Minireview


References

  1. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, et al. 2014. Expert consensus document. The international scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11: 506-514.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Butel MJ. 2014. Probiotics, gut microbiota and health. Med. Mal. Infect. 44: 1-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Saini R, Saini S, Sugandha. 2009. Probiotics: the health boosters. J. Cutan. Aesthet. Surg. 2: 112.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  4. Shah NP. 2007. Functional cultures and health benefits. Int. Dairy J. 17: 1262-1277.
    CrossRef
  5. Mital BK, Garg SK. 1995. Anticarcinogenic, hypocholesterolemic, and antagonistic activities of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 21: 175-214.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Saxelin M, Tynkkynen S, Mattila-Sandholm T, de Vos WM. 2005. Probiotic and other functional microbes: from markets to mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16: 204-211.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Bull M, Plummer S, Marchesi J, Mahenthiralingam E. 2013. The life history of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a probiotic: a tale of revisionary taxonomy, misidentification and commercial success. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 349: 77-87.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Altermann E, Russell WM, Azcarate-Peril MA, Barrangou R, Buck BL, McAuliffe O, et al. 2005. Complete genome sequence of the probiotic lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 3906-3912.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  9. Azcarate-Peril MA, Altermann E, Hoover-Fitzula RL, Cano RJ, Klaenhammer TR. 2004. Identification and inactivation of genetic loci involved with Lactobacillus acidophilus acid tolerance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 5315-5322.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  10. Claesson MJ, van Sinderen D, O'Toole PW. 2007. The genus Lactobacillus--a genomic basis for understanding its diversity. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 269: 22-28.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Azcarate-Peril MA, McAuliffe O, Altermann E, Lick S, Russell WM, Klaenhammer TR. 2005. Microarray analysis of a twocomponent regulatory system involved in acid resistance and proteolytic activity in Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 5794-5804.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  12. Pfeiler EA, Klaenhammer TR. 2009. Role of transporter proteins in bile tolerance of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 6013-6016.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  13. Khaleghi M, Kermanshahi RK, Yaghoobi MM, Zarkesh-Esfahani SH, Baghizadeh A. 2010. Assessment of bile salt effects on s-layer production, slp gene expression and some physicochemical properties of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 20: 749-756.
  14. Buck BL, Altermann E, Svingerud T, Klaenhammer TR. 2005. Functional analysis of putative adhesion factors in Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 8344-8351.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  15. Sanders ME, Klaenhammer TR. 2001. Invited review: the scientific basis of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM functionality as a probiotic. J. Dairy Sci. 84: 319-331.
    CrossRef
  16. Sanders ME, Walker DC, Walker KM, Aoyama K, Klaenhammer TR. 1996. Performance of commercial cultures in fluid milk applications. J. Dairy Sci. 79: 943-955.
    CrossRef
  17. Shah NP. 2000. Probiotic bacteria: selective enumeration and survival in dairy foods. J. Dairy Sci. 83: 894-907.
    CrossRef
  18. Bron PA, van Baarlen P, Kleerebezem M. 2011. Emerging molecular insights into the interaction between probiotics and the host intestinal mucosa. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10: 66-78.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Gilliland SE. 1989. Acidophilus milk products: a review of potential benefits to consumers. J. Dairy Sci. 72: 2483-2494.
    CrossRef
  20. Wang KY, Li SN, Liu CS, Perng DS, Su YC, Wu DC, et al. 2004. Effects of ingesting Lactobacillus- and Bifidobacterium-containing yogurt in subjects with colonized Helicobacter pylori. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 80: 737-741.
  21. Tegegne BA, Kebede B. 2022. Probiotics, their prophylactic and therapeutic applications in human health development: a review of the literature. Heliyon 8: e09725.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  22. Reid G, Jass J, Sebulsky MT, McCormick JK. 2003. Potential uses of probiotics in clinical practice. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16: 658-672.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  23. Bennett A, Eley KG. 1976. Intestinal pH and propulsion: an explanation of diarrhoea in lactase deficiency and laxation by lactulose. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 28: 192-195.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Goldin BR, Gorbach SL. 1980. Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus dietary supplements on 1,2-dimethylhydrazine dihydrochlorideinduced intestinal cancer in rats. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 64: 263-265.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Goldin BR, Gorbach SL. 1984. The effect of milk and lactobacillus feeding on human intestinal bacterial enzyme activity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 39: 756-761.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Chang JH, Shim YY, Cha SK, Reaney MJT, Chee KM. 2012. Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus KFRI342 on the development of chemically induced precancerous growths in the rat colon. J. Med. Microbiol. 61: 361-368.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Singh VP, Sharma J, Babu S, Rizwanulla, Singla A. 2013. Role of probiotics in health and disease: a review. J. Pak Med. Assoc. 63: 253-257.
  28. Kopp-Hoolihan L. 2001. Prophylactic and therapeutic uses of probiotics: a review. J. Am. Diet Assoc. 101: 229-238.
    CrossRef
  29. Oh JK, Kim YR, Lee B, Choi YM, Kim SH. 2021. Prevention of cholesterol gallstone formation by Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121 and Lactobacillus fermentum MF27 in lithogenic diet-induced mice. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 41: 343-352.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  30. Lee NY, Shin MJ, Youn GS, Yoon SJ, Choi YR, Kim HS, et al. 2021. Lactobacillus attenuates progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by lowering cholesterol and steatosis. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 27: 110-124.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  31. Huang Y, Wang J, Quan G, Wang X, Yang L, Zhong L. 2014. Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 prevents atherosclerosis via inhibition of intestinal cholesterol absorption in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80: 7496-7504.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  32. Wang L, Zhou B, Zhou X, Wang Y, Wang H, Jia S, et al. 2019. Combined lowering effects of rosuvastatin and L. acidophilus on cholesterol levels in rat. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 29: 473-481.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Lloyd-Jones DM. 2010. Cardiovascular risk prediction: basic concepts, current status, and future directions. Circulation 121: 1768-1777.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. Tan WQ, Wang JX, Lin ZQ, Li YR, Lin Y, Li PF. 2008. Novel cardiac apoptotic pathway: the dephosphorylation of apoptosis repressor with caspase recruitment domain by calcineurin. Circulation 118: 2268-2276.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Ding SL, Wang JX, Jiao JQ, Tu X, Wang Q, Liu F, et al. 2013. A pre-microRNA-149 (miR-149) genetic variation affects miR-149 maturation and its ability to regulate the Puma protein in apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 288: 26865-26877.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  36. Xue S, Liu D, Zhu W, Su Z, Zhang L, Zhou C, et al. 2019. Circulating MiR-17-5p, MiR-126-5p and MiR-145-3p are novel biomarkers for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Front. Physiol. 10: 123.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  37. Mann GV. 1974. Studies of a surfactant and cholesteremia in the Maasai. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 27: 464-469.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Harrison VC, Peat G. 1975. Serum cholesterol and bowel flora in the newborn. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 28: 1351-1355.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Stepankova R, Tonar Z, Bartova J, Nedorost L, Rossman P, Poledne R, et al. 2010. Absence of microbiota (germ-free conditions) accelerates the atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice fed standard low cholesterol diet. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 17: 796-804.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. Gilliland SE, Walker DK. 1990. Factors to consider when selecting a culture of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a dietary adjunct to produce a hypocholesterolemic effect in humans. J. Dairy Sci. 73: 905-911.
    CrossRef
  41. Gilliland SE, Nelson CR, Maxwell C. 1985. Assimilation of cholesterol by Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49: 377-381.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  42. Park YH, Kim JG, Shin YW, Kim SH, Whang KY. 2007. Effect of dietary inclusion of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121 on cholesterol metabolism in rats. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 17: 655-662.
  43. Park YH, Kim JG, Shin YW, Kim HS, Kim YJ, Chun T, et al. 2008. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus 43121 and a mixture of Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium longum on the serum cholesterol level and fecal sterol excretion in hypercholesterolemiainduced pigs. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 72: 595-600.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  44. Song M, Park S, Lee H, Min B, Jung S, Park S, et al. 2015. Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus NS1 on plasma cholesterol levels in dietinduced obese mice. J. Dairy Sci. 98: 1492-1501.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  45. Huang Y, Wang J, Cheng Y, Zheng Y. 2010. The hypocholesterolaemic effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus American type culture collection 4356 in rats are mediated by the down-regulation of Niemann-Pick C1-like 1. Br. J. Nutr. 104: 807-812.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  46. Chen L, Liu W, Li Y, Luo S, Liu Q, Zhong Y, et al. 2013. Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 attenuates the atherosclerotic progression through modulation of oxidative stress and inflammatory process. Int. Immunopharmacol. 17: 108-115.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  47. Lightfoot YL, Selle K, Yang T, Goh YJ, Sahay B, Zadeh M, et al. 2015. SIGNR3-dependent immune regulation by Lactobacillus acidophilus surface layer protein A in colitis. EMBO J. 34: 881-895.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  48. Chandhni PR, Pradhan D, Sowmya K, Gupta S, Kadyan S, Choudhary R, et al. 2021. Ameliorative effect of surface proteins of probiotic Lactobacilli in colitis mouse models. Front. Microbiol. 12: 679773.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  49. Wu Z, Pan DD, Guo Y, Zeng X. 2013. Structure and anti-inflammatory capacity of peptidoglycan from Lactobacillus acidophilus in RAW-264.7 cells. Carbohydr. Polym. 96: 466-473.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. Moshiri M, Dallal MMS, Rezaei F, Douraghi M, Sharifi L, Noroozbabaei Z, et al. 2017. The effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus PTCC 1643 on cultured intestinal epithelial cells infected with Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis. Osong. Public Health Res. Perspect 8: 54-60.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  51. Simenhoff ML, Dunn SR, Zollner GP, Fitzpatrick ME, Emery SM, Sandine WE, et al. 1996. Biomodulation of the toxic and nutritional effects of small bowel bacterial overgrowth in end-stage kidney disease using freeze-dried Lactobacillus acidophilus. Miner. Electrolyte Metab. 22: 92-96.
  52. Dunn SR, Simenhoff ML, Ahmed KE, Gaughan WJ, Eltayeb BO, Fitzpatrick MED, et al. 1998. Effect of oral administration of freezedried Lactobacillus acidophilus on small bowel bacterial overgrowth in patients with end stage kidney disease: Reducing uremic toxins and improving nutrition. Int. Dairy J. 8: 545-553.
    CrossRef
  53. Shah N. 1993. Effectiveness of dairy-products in alleviation of lactose-intolerance. Food Aust. 45: 268-271.
  54. Lin MY, Yen CL, Chen SH. 1998. Management of lactose maldigestion by consuming milk containing lactobacilli. Dig. Dis. Sci. 43: 133-137.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  55. Mustapha A, Jiang T, Savaiano DA. 1997. Improvement of lactose digestion by humans following ingestion of unfermented acidophilus milk: influence of bile sensitivity, lactose transport, and acid tolerance of Lactobacillus acidophilus. J. Dairy Sci. 80: 1537-1545.
    CrossRef
  56. Kim HS, Gilliland SE. 1983. Lactobacillus acidophilus as a dietary adjunct for milk to aid lactose digestion in humans. J. Dairy Sci. 66: 959-966.
    CrossRef
  57. Montes RG, Bayless TM, Saavedra JM, Perman JA. 1995. Effect of milks inoculated with Lactobacillus acidophilus or a yogurt starter culture in lactose-maldigesting children. J. Dairy Sci. 78: 1657-1664.
    CrossRef
  58. Pakdaman MN, Udani JK, Molina JP, Shahani M. 2016. The effects of the DDS-1 strain of lactobacillus on symptomatic relief for lactose intolerance - a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover clinical trial. Nutr. J. 15: 56.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  59. Newcomer AD, Park HS, O'Brien PC, McGill DB. 1983. Response of patients with irritable bowel syndrome and lactase deficiency using unfermented acidophilus milk. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 38: 257-263.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  60. McDonough FE, Hitchins AD, Wong NP, Wells P, Bodwell CE. 1987. Modification of sweet acidophilus milk to improve utilization by lactose-intolerant persons. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 45: 570-574.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  61. Payne DL, Welsh JD, Manion CV, Tsegaye A, Herd LD. 1981. Effectiveness of milk products in dietary management of lactose malabsorption. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 34: 2711-2715.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  62. El-Deeb NM, Yassin AM, Al-Madboly LA, El-Hawiet A. 2018. A novel purified Lactobacillus acidophilus 20079 exopolysaccharide, LA-EPS-20079, molecularly regulates both apoptotic and NF-kappaB inflammatory pathways in human colon cancer. Microb. Cell Fact. 17: 29.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  63. Khedr OMS, El-Sonbaty SM, Moawed FSM, Kandil EI, Abdel-Maksoud BE. 2021. Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 exopolysaccharides suppresses mediators of inflammation through the inhibition of TLR2/STAT-3/P38-MAPK pathway in DENinduced hepatocarcinogenesis in rats. Nutr. Cancer 74: 1037-1047.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  64. Wagner RD, Pierson C, Warner T, Dohnalek M, Farmer J, Roberts L, et al. 1997. Biotherapeutic effects of probiotic bacteria on candidiasis in immunodeficient mice. Infect. Immun. 65: 4165-4172.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  65. Tejada-Simon MV, Lee JH, Ustunol Z, Pestka JJ. 1999. Ingestion of yogurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium to potentiate immunoglobulin A responses to cholera toxin in mice. J. Dairy Sci. 82: 649-660.
    CrossRef
  66. Yang Y, Song M, Liu Y, Liu H, Sun L, Peng Y, et al. 2016. Renoprotective approaches and strategies in acute kidney injury. Pharmacol. Ther. 163: 58-73.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  67. Zhang P, Han X, Zhang X, Zhu X. 2021. Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 alleviates renal ischemia-reperfusion injury through antioxidant stress and anti-inflammatory responses and improves intestinal microbial distribution. Front. Nutr. 8: 667695.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  68. Sadeghzadeh J, Vakili A, Sameni HR, Shadnoush M, Bandegi AR, Zahedi Khorasani M. 2017. The effect of oral consumption of probiotics in prevention of heart injury in a rat myocardial infarction model: A histopathological, hemodynamic and biochemical evaluation. Iran Biomed J. 21: 174-181.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  69. Reid G. 2000. In vitro testing of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM (TM) as a possible probiotic for the urogenital tract. Int. Dairy J. 10: 415-419.
    CrossRef
  70. Amdekar S, Singh V, Kumar A, Sharma P, Singh R. 2013. Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus acidophilus regulate inflammatory pathway and improve antioxidant status in collagen-induced arthritic rats. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 33: 1-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  71. Paul AK, Paul A, Jahan R, Jannat K, Bondhon TA, Hasan A, et al. 2021. Probiotics and amelioration of rheumatoid arthritis: Significant roles of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Microorganisms 9: 1070.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  72. Holzapfel WH, Schillinger U. 2002. Introduction to pre- and probiotics. Food Res. Int. 35: 109-116.
    CrossRef
  73. Marteau P, Boutron-Ruault MC. 2002. Nutritional advantages of probiotics and prebiotics. Br. J. Nutr. 87 Suppl 2: S153-157.
    CrossRef

Related articles in JMB

More Related Articles

Article

Minireview

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022; 32(10): 1226-1233

Published online October 28, 2022 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2205.05041

Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.

The Functional Roles of Lactobacillus acidophilus in Different Physiological and Pathological Processes

Huijuan Gao1, Xin Li1, Xiatian Chen1, Deng Hai2, Chuang Wei1, Lei Zhang1*, and Peifeng Li1*

1Institute for Translational Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, 308 Ningxia Road, Qingdao 266071, P.R. China
2Department of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB243UE, UK

Correspondence to:Lei Zhang,      leizhang@qdu.edu.cn
Peifeng Li,      peifli@qdu.edu.cn

Received: May 23, 2022; Revised: August 23, 2022; Accepted: August 25, 2022

Abstract

Probiotics are live microorganisms that can be consumed by humans in amounts sufficient to offer health-promoting effects. Owing to their various biological functions, probiotics are widely used in biological engineering, industry and agriculture, food safety, and the life and health fields. Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus), an important human intestinal probiotic, was originally isolated from the human gastrointestinal tract and its functions have been widely studied ever since it was named in 1900. L. acidophilus has been found to play important roles in many aspects of human health. Due to its good resistance against acid and bile salts, it has broad application prospects in functional, edible probiotic preparations. In this review, we explore the basic characteristics and biological functions of L. acidophilus based on the research progress made thus far worldwide. Various problems to be solved regarding the applications of probiotic products and their future development are also discussed.

Keywords: Probiotics, Lactobacillus acidophilus, intestinal flora, cholesterol, immunity

Introduction

The Food and Agriculture Association (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO) have highlighted that probiotics are live strains of microorganisms that have been carefully selected. When administered in sufficient amounts, probiotics can bring health benefits to the host [1]. There are a large number of probiotic bacteria that colonize the human intestine, which can also interact and co-evolve with the human body. They help the host to digest and absorb nutrients in food, metabolize toxic waste products, and produce amino acids and short-chain fatty acids necessary for normal human activities. They can provide definite health effects such as improving the host microecological balance while exerting other beneficial effects on the intestinal tract [2].

Since the early 1990s, a plethora of "probiotic" health products have swept throughout the global market. In the meantime, "probiotics" have become a hot international research topic. Probiotics have been extensively studied in a variety of diseases and have been demonstrated to produce a range of potential health effects. The most studied species include lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, and yeasts [3]. Among them, L. acidophilus, an important intestinal probiotic in the lactic acid bacteria (LAB) family, has had a great deal of focus placed upon it in terms of research and development, especially as it is so closely linked to human health. As such, L. acidophilus is widely considered to have probiotic effects and is one of the most commonly recommended microorganisms for dietary use [4]. Compared with many other probiotics, L. acidophilus has better resistance to both acid and bile salt. These characteristics facilitate the survival and proliferation of L. acidophilus in the harsh environment of the gastrointestinal tract. Its ability to survive under these conditions provides further opportunities for its products to successfully function in the human body. When the total amount of L. acidophilus reaches a certain threshold value, health promotion can be achieved. L. acidophilus has multiple effects on the human body, including nutritional effects, regulation of intestinal flora balance, enhancement of immunity, age-delaying and anti-cancer effects, and support of cholesterol reduction [5, 6].

In this review, the basic characteristics of L. acidophilus are summarized, its biological functions in various diseases are discussed, and future research directions and applications in the form of probiotic products are explored. We hope to unveil the relationships between L. acidophilus and various life activities and disease development so as to provide a theoretical basis for later research and application direction.

Basic Features and Functional Mechanisms of L. acidophilus

L. acidophilus was initially isolated from infant feces in 1900 and was officially named Lactobacillus acidophilus. Subsequently, a series of biological characteristics and functions have been studied. L. acidophilus is subdivided into many strain types, including L. acidophilus LA-1, LA-5, NCFM, and ATCC4356, DDS-1 [7]. Different strains also confer differing probiotic properties and functions. Since a strain may have multiple names, it is easy to confuse the strains during the process of understanding them and when undertaking research. Fortunately, most of the work on L. acidophilus, especially the work relating to its probiotic effects, has been done on particular strains.

Basic Features of L. acidophilus

L. acidophilus, within the genus Lactobacillus in the family Lactobacillaceae, is a gram-positive bacillus that does not form spores. They present as slender rods with a circular end, measuring 2-10 μm long. Most L. acidophilus strains are microaerobic bacteria, which grow better in anaerobic environments, or in 5~10% CO2, rather than in aerobic environments. Their optimum culture temperature is generally 35~38°C, and they basically do not grow in temperatures below 20°C. L. acidophilus has poor heat resistance and its optimum pH is 5.5~6.0. The growth characteristics of different strains are also slightly different from each other. L. acidophilus is eosinophilic and has good resistance toward acids and bile [8, 9]. It can grow and reproduce in environments where other LAB cannot grow. It can also use glucose, fructose, lactose and sucrose to carry out homotype fermentation and can produce DL-lactic acid via fermentation [10].

L. acidophilus is a species of beneficial microbial flora and has been proven to have many good probiotic characteristics that can be roughly divided into two categories. The first category covers the essential probiotic properties of L. acidophilus which have been demonstrated in vitro and include tolerance to low pH, bile resistance, adhesion to human colon cells in cell culture, antibiotic production, lactase activity, and product stability [11-17]. The second category includes the overall probiotic effects that have been observed in animal-level feeding studies, such as regulation of host immune responses, reduction of host serum cholesterol, improvement of host lactose metabolism, and prevention or treatment of infection [18-20]. Here, we summarize the basic probiotic properties and main biological functions of L. acidophilus (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Probiotic properties and biological functions of Lactobacillus acidophilus. L. acidophilus is a species of beneficial microbial flora and has been proven to play an important role in many pathological and physiological processes. It has been shown to improve CVD and lactose intolerance, prevent and treat cancer, regulate immunity, and improve gastrointestinal diseases.

Functional Mechanisms of L. acidophilus

According to current studies, L. acidophilus participates in the host intestinal tract mainly through the production of metabolites and regulation of intestinal microbiota [21, 22].

First, L. acidophilus can regulate the balance of intestinal flora by reducing the intestinal pH and producing metabolites [21, 23]. The optimal pH of many intestinal pathogenic bacteria is neutral or slightly alkaline. Lactic acid produced by L. acidophilus metabolism can reduce pH, thus inhibiting the growth and reproduction of pathogenic bacteria [23]. In addition, some pathogenic microorganisms produce enzymes that can catalyze the conversion of carcinogenic precursors to carcinogens, such as azo reductase, nitro reductase, and β-glucosidase [24, 25]. L. acidophilus can not only inhibit the growth of these pathogenic microorganisms and reduce the production of these enzymes, but can also inhibit enzyme activity [25, 26]. Second, competition for adhesion sites with pathogenic bacteria is an important mechanism for L. acidophilus to inhibit the function of pathogenic bacteria, thereby interfering with their invasion into cells [27]. Surface the S-layer protein, extracellular polysaccharide and lipoteichoic acid of many strains can compete for adhesion with pathogenic bacteria [21, 28]. Third, the role of L. acidophilus in many diseases also depends on its ability to reduce serum cholesterol level [29, 30]. L. acidophilus can absorb and assimilate cholesterol [31, 32].

Although some mechanisms have been found, neither these mechanisms nor the influencing factors of L. acidophilus in the host have been fully studied and efforts should be made to explore them further.

Biological Functions of L. acidophilus

Risk Reduction of Cardiovascular Disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, accounting for about one third of global deaths [33]. The occurrence of CVD is related to many factors [34-36]. Increasing blood cholesterol is one risk factor that directly impacts CVD. In the 1970s, Mann and Shaper found that populations of particular African tribes generally possessed lower incidences of high serum cholesterol [37]. After investigation, they found that the residents of these tribes regularly drank yogurt fermented by L. acidophilus, suggesting that this bacteria might regulate blood lipids [37]. Since then, more researchers have paid attention to the uses of L. acidophilus and other probiotics relevant to cholesterol reduction and the cholesterol-lowering effects of L. acidophilus have been confirmed. In addition, studies have investigated the effects of L. acidophilus intervention on cholesterol reduction and atherosclerosis development in animal models.

Harrison and Peat reported that the addition of L. acidophilus to baby feed reduced infant serum cholesterol from 147 mg/100 ml on the 5th day down to 119 mg/100 ml by the 8th day of intervention [38]. This decrease in serum cholesterol levels was accompanied by a significant increase in the number of LAB. The number of Escherichia coli present in fecal samples also decreased [38]. Stepankova et al. found that supplementation of L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 also promoted the proliferation of bifidobacteria [39]. Gilliland and Walker showed that L. acidophilus NCFM was able to remove cholesterol from laboratory growth media [40, 41]. NCFM has been reported to ingest cholesterol in the presence of bile and in the absence of oxygen, both of which occur in the gut. The researchers tested these effects on young pigs and the results showed that feeding L. acidophilus to pigs significantly inhibited the increased serum cholesterol levels that are usually observed in individuals fed a high-cholesterol diet. Park and colleagues have reported that adding L. acidophilus 43121 to a high-cholesterol diet given to rats resulted in reduced serum cholesterol [42, 43]. Song et al. showed that L. acidophilus NS1 can reduce plasma LDL-C by increasing the expression of LDLR and SREBP2 in the liver [44].

Huang et al. found that L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 had a significant cholesterol-lowering effect on rats fed with a high-cholesterol diet by inhibiting the expression of NPC1L1 in the small intestine [31, 45]. Chen and colleagues found that L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 alleviated atherosclerotic lesions in ApoE−/− mice[46]. L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 inhibited oxidative stress by regulating the production of MDA, oxLDL and SOD, suppressed inflammation via regulations of TNF-α and IL-10 levels, and improved intestinal flora, resulting in blocked progression of atherosclerosis. However, it did not significantly reduce cholesterol levels. In different experimental models, many studies have produced different results due to inconsistent experimental methods. Therefore, the role and functional mechanism of L. acidophilus in reducing cholesterol and alleviating atherosclerosis require further detailed exploration.

Improvement of Gastrointestinal Disease Outcomes

Studies have shown that probiotics can regulate intestinal flora, play a beneficial role in inflammatory diseases such as ulcerative colitis (UC), and have been used effectively to treat and suppress human intestinal infections. Lightfoot and colleagues described the role of L. acidophilus NCFM surface layer protein A as a key effector in the prevention of colitis in mice [47] . Chandhni et al. also showed that the surface proteins in NCFM strains could reverse histopathological damage caused by colitis [48], thus providing a potentially safer option for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

In the normal intestinal flora in humans, L. acidophilus plays a key role in inhibiting the growth of pathogens such as Salmonella enteritidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Shigella dysenteriae. Therefore, studies have shown that L. acidophilus exhibited strong anti-inflammatory activities [49]. Moshiri et al. reported that L. acidophilus PTCC 1643 could affect the expression of TLR2 and TLR4 in HT29 intestinal epithelial cells under the action of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SesE), and inhibit the inflammatory response caused by SesE infection [50]. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) refers to the changes in the number or types of flora in the small intestine. It is considered to be a condition that can exist for many years without causing obvious symptoms although it is related to chronic digestive problems. Studies by Simenhoff and colleagues have shown that NCFM can inhibit the overgrowth of small intestinal bacteria, reduce the levels of toxic metabolites such as dimethylamine and nitrosodimethylamine in the blood, and positively affect intestinal colonization [51, 52], thus improving the nutritional status of patients. These observations support the use of L. acidophilus for the prevention and treatment of intestinal diseases. Further in vivo and in vitro studies are needed to elucidate the detailed mechanisms of these anti-inflammatory effects.

Improvement of Lactose Intolerance

Lactose intolerance, also known as lactose indigestion or lactose malabsorption, refers to the state in which the human body does not produce the enzyme lactase. After consuming milk or dairy products, some people might have diarrhea and other symptoms of intestinal discomfort due to the osmotic effect of the undecomposed lactose.

Previously, many studies have proved that LAB have the ability to be a source of lactase in the small intestine, which helps people with lactase deficiency to digest lactose. Related fermented dairy products may also enhance lactose tolerance [53].

Some probiotic studies have shown that L. acidophilus can improve lactose digestion or symptoms in lactose-intolerant patients [54, 55]. Among these studies, in vitro evaluation of the lactase levels of various probiotics has shown that the lactase levels of L. acidophilus NCFM were high when compared to all of the probiotics tested. Multiple studies have also shown that NCFM can improve lactose digestion and relieve symptoms of lactose intolerance such as bloating and diarrhea [56, 57]. A study speculated that the bacteria might metabolize lactose during digestion and transport it through the gastrointestinal tract. The study by Pakdaman et al. found that L. acidophilus DDS-1, a unique and edible strain, can improve lactose intolerance symptoms such as diarrhea, cramps, and vomiting [58]. However, a number of studies have shown the opposite effects. For example, Newcomer et al. demonstrated that dairy products containing L. acidophilus NCFM did not significantly improve human lactose intolerance [59-61]. The reason for these contradictory results has been associated with the levels of NCFM of L. acidophilus. Therefore, in order to better apply the functional properties of L. acidophilus and to improve lactose intolerance, it is essential to explore and adjust the probiotics levels and the formula with each product.

Prevention and Treatment of Cancer

Probiotics are considered a safe and cost-effective way to prevent or treat a variety of cancers, including colon and liver cancer. Several studies have suggested that consumption of cultured dairy products may reduce colon cancer risk, since the effects of diet are mediated by metabolic effects of intestinal organisms. The activities of β-glucuronase, nitroreductase, azoreductase and other microbial enzymes have been used to monitor colon cancer changes. Goldin and Gorbach observed that adding live L. acidophilus into the diet of carnivorous rats significantly reduced azoreductase, nitroreductase and glucuronidase activity [24, 25]. The incidence of colon cancer in rats with L. acidophilus NCFM was also lower. Their later study found that NCFM alongside antibiotics inhibited the growth of colon tumors in rats. In human, daily consumption of milk containing NCFM reduced the activity of these three fecal enzymes by a factor of two- to four-fold and reduced the incidence of colon cancer [24, 25]. In addition, they found that nitroreductase activity continued to decrease even three weeks after fermented milk intake was stopped, thus indicating a long-term change in colonic flora [24, 25].

Studies have shown that the extracellular polysaccharides (EPSs) synthesized by L. acidophilus have exerted health benefits by stimulating the immune response and fighting tumor cells [62]. The anticancer and immunomodulatory activities of EPSs synthesized by L. acidophilus have been proven to combat colon cancer and inflammatory liver cancer. Khedr and colleagues used male rats as a model and confirmed that L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 EPSs had immunomodulatory effects on liver cancer induced by diethylnitrosamine (DEN) and gamma radiation (IR) [63]. They proposed that L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 EPSs might be used as a safe and effective probiotic to prevent and treat liver cancer.

Regulation of Immune Capacity

The immune function of L. acidophilus is mainly conducted via regulating the body’s immune system, limiting pathogen colonization within the body, and controlling metabolic disorders and enteritis. Probiotics are used clinically to treat diseases caused by immune system disorders. This can significantly reduce infection time and respiratory tract infection frequency and also improve the therapeutic effects for allergic asthma.

The role of L. acidophilus in regulating the body's ability to respond to immune responses has been demonstrated in previous studies. Wagner et al. confirmed that NCFM induced antibody- and cell-mediated responses to Candida albicans in immunodeficient mice [64]. The serum levels of IgG, IgA, and IgM were higher in euthymic immunocompromised mice and were thought to reduce the severity of candidiasis. Yoghurt prepared with yoghurt cultures containing NCFM, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Bifidobacterium were tested for their effects on mucosal and systemic IgA and IgG responses in mice immunized orally with cholera toxin. The results showed that IgA against the cholera toxin was higher in the intestine and serum of the mice fed the formulated yogurt than that observed in the mice fed skim milk [65]. These results suggest that coculture including NCFM may increase immune responses to oral antigens.

Other Functions

We summarized the biological functions, processes, and effects of L. acidophilus- related strains in pathological and physiological processes (Table 1). However, the biological functions of L. acidophilus are far more extensive than what we have mentioned. The role of L. acidophilus in many other diseases is constantly being explored and new discoveries are being made. Studies have shown that kidney tissue damage can be alleviated by reducing oxidative stress, inflammation, and cell death [66]. Zhang et al. first explored the relationship between ATCC 4356 and renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) [67]. They found that L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 alleviated renal IRI through antioxidant stress and anti-inflammatory responses and improved intestinal microbial distribution in renal IRI mice. In the following treatment with ATCC 4356, the levels of anti-inflammatory factors (IL-4 and IL10) were upregulated, whereas the levels of pro-inflammatory factors (IL-1β, IL-8, TNF-α and IFN-γ) were downregulated. In addition, renal tissue apoptosis in IRI mice was reduced [67].

Table 1 . The main biological effects of related strains of L. acidophilus..

Type of strainFunctionMajor biological processes and their effectsReference
L. acidophilus ATCC 4356Inhibit CVD progressionInhibit oxidative stress by modulating the productions of MDA, oxLDL and SOD; suppress inflammatory status by regulating TNF-α and IL-10 levels; inhibit NPC1L1 expression in the small intestine; improve intestinal microflora; inhibit the development of atherosclerosis.[31, 40, 45, 46]
L. acidophilus NCFMAssimilate cholesterol and control cholesterol levels.[40, 41]
L. acidophilus 43121Affect cholesterol metabolism and reduce blood cholesterol levels.[40, 42, 43]
L. acidophilus NS1Reduce plasma LDL-C by increasing hepatic LDLR and SREBP2 expression.[44]
L. acidophilus NCFMImprove gastrointestinal diseasesStrain surface layer proteins play an important role; alleviate Tcell-induced colitis by significantly reducing the proinflammatory response; preserve microbiome composition and intestinal barrier function; reverse histopathological damage caused by colitis; reduce the level of toxic metabolites.[47, 48, 51, 52]
L. acidophilus PTCC 1643Modulate the expression of TLR2 and TLR4 in HT29 intestinal epithelial cells challenged with SesE; enhance anti-inflammatory effects.[50]
L. acidophilus NCFMImprove lactose intoleranceStrain has a higher level of lactase, which metabolizes lactose during digestion and transits through the gastrointestinal tract, thereby improving lactose digestion.[56, 57]
L. acidophilus DDS-1Assist in breaking down lactose; improve lactose intolerance symptoms such as diarrhea, cramps and vomiting.[58]
L. acidophilus ATCC 4356Prevent and treat colon cancer, liver cancer and other cancersThe exopolysaccharides of the strain have immunomodulatory and antitumor activities; regulate the TLR2/STAT-3/P38-MAPK pathway associated with inflammation against HCC.[63]
L. acidophilus NCFMStimulate the immune response; reduce the activities of β-glucuronase, nitroreductase, azoreductase and other microbial enzymes; produce compounds that inhibit tumor proliferation; reduce the incidence of colon cancer and inhibit the growth of colon tumors.[24, 25]
L. acidophilus NCFMRegulate immune capacityReduce levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines significantly and mobilize a systemic immune response; limit pathogen colonization in the body, control metabolic disorders.[47, 64, 65]
L. acidophilus ATCC314Manage inflammatory disordersRegulate the secretion of inflammatory cytokines; reduce oxidative stress.[70]


Studies have shown that oral L. acidophilus can improve heart function in mice with myocardial infarction. Sadeghzadeh and co-researchers found that L. acidophilus was able to improve the hemodynamic and histopathological indicators of the ISO-induced myocardial injury rat model [68], providing obvious myocardial protection. In the future, probiotic supplements may become a new option for patients with ischemic heart disease.

L. acidophilus has been shown to have potential applications in the prevention and control of genitourinary and vaginal infections. Reid et al. precultured L. acidophilus NCFM with urinary and vaginal epithelial cells from healthy women and subsequently exposed them to different urinary tract pathogens. Results showed that NCFM competitively excluded these pathogens and effectively prevented and suppressed urinary tract and vaginal infections [69].

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common inflammatory joint disease. It has been reported that the ingestion of L. acidophilus ATCC 314 exerted anti-inflammatory and potent antioxidant properties in a collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) rat model [70, 71]. This suggests that L. acidophilus is a promising treatment that should be tested further in RA patient preclinical trials.

Applications and Future Prospects of L. acidophilus

As people pay more and more attention to health issues, it is of great importance that different kinds of probiotics within food are able to play a healthy role. Of these probiotics, L. acidophilus is one of the most commonly used microorganisms, as it is thought to have various beneficial effects on human health. These advantageous effects include lowering blood cholesterol, improving gastrointestinal diseases, and reducing the risk of lactose intolerance and carcinogenicity [72, 73]. Research and development into L. acidophilus has received widespread attention. It is referred to as the third-generation yogurt starter strain. L. acidophilus has good acid and bile salt resistance and produces a variety of antibacterial substances during metabolism. Due to these attributes, L. acidophilus strains have broad application prospects as functional, edible bacteria.

Despite these favorable characteristics, through our analysis of studies on L. acidophilus which highlighted our present understanding of the current application status, we found that there are also many problems and limitations in the research and application of L. acidophilus. First, due to different naming methods, the same strain may have multiple names. This may lead to confusion during literature searches and research. Important findings could be missed, resulting in incomplete information collection. Second, due to the different research methods used to investigate probiotics, results from different research groups may deviate from each other. Different concentrations and ratios of probiotics have been shown to have different effects, therefore the health benefits of certain disease symptoms remain to be proven. Further research on the optimal strains, doses and dosing algorithms are of key importance for future research. In addition, different species of L. acidophilus can exhibit similar probiotic effects in vitro, but their properties differ significantly when evaluated in vivo.

Currently, probiotic regulation of intestinal flora is recognized as an interesting way to prevent certain diseases. Recent studies have proposed many mechanisms by which probiotics function, but the effectiveness of many probiotics has not been proven in different conditions, which has presently limited the promotion and application of probiotics. There are probably several main reasons why these research limitations occur, including too many low-quality studies, variability within the microbiome, and great diversity between the probiotic strains used. However, some studies have reported reasonable and encouraging results that support further research into probiotics. With this in mind, we should put more effort into overcoming the difficulties. First, because most studies have, so far, focused on animal studies or small human research groups, it is difficult to assess the possible health effects of these probiotics in the general population. Therefore, we need to conduct more extensive epidemiological evaluations which take into account the variability between patients. Due to the high cost of such interventions, it is necessary to characterize strains well to select the strains that are most effective for a particular application. Second, we should identify bacterial markers of the microbiome in related diseases in order to gain sufficient clinical trial capacity. Furthermore, new methods for analyzing the microbiome and its function will greatly facilitate the research when studying large numbers of samples. Probiotics could serve as a low-cost, low-risk alternative to antibiotic treatment in order to prevent infection. We believe that the development of probiotics will open up another impressive field of research. Further research in this area may provide exciting avenues for healthcare strategies, as well as creating more economic and social benefits.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 91849209) and Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (Grant No. ZR2020QH016).

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Probiotic properties and biological functions of Lactobacillus acidophilus. L. acidophilus is a species of beneficial microbial flora and has been proven to play an important role in many pathological and physiological processes. It has been shown to improve CVD and lactose intolerance, prevent and treat cancer, regulate immunity, and improve gastrointestinal diseases.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2022; 32: 1226-1233https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2205.05041

Table 1 . The main biological effects of related strains of L. acidophilus..

Type of strainFunctionMajor biological processes and their effectsReference
L. acidophilus ATCC 4356Inhibit CVD progressionInhibit oxidative stress by modulating the productions of MDA, oxLDL and SOD; suppress inflammatory status by regulating TNF-α and IL-10 levels; inhibit NPC1L1 expression in the small intestine; improve intestinal microflora; inhibit the development of atherosclerosis.[31, 40, 45, 46]
L. acidophilus NCFMAssimilate cholesterol and control cholesterol levels.[40, 41]
L. acidophilus 43121Affect cholesterol metabolism and reduce blood cholesterol levels.[40, 42, 43]
L. acidophilus NS1Reduce plasma LDL-C by increasing hepatic LDLR and SREBP2 expression.[44]
L. acidophilus NCFMImprove gastrointestinal diseasesStrain surface layer proteins play an important role; alleviate Tcell-induced colitis by significantly reducing the proinflammatory response; preserve microbiome composition and intestinal barrier function; reverse histopathological damage caused by colitis; reduce the level of toxic metabolites.[47, 48, 51, 52]
L. acidophilus PTCC 1643Modulate the expression of TLR2 and TLR4 in HT29 intestinal epithelial cells challenged with SesE; enhance anti-inflammatory effects.[50]
L. acidophilus NCFMImprove lactose intoleranceStrain has a higher level of lactase, which metabolizes lactose during digestion and transits through the gastrointestinal tract, thereby improving lactose digestion.[56, 57]
L. acidophilus DDS-1Assist in breaking down lactose; improve lactose intolerance symptoms such as diarrhea, cramps and vomiting.[58]
L. acidophilus ATCC 4356Prevent and treat colon cancer, liver cancer and other cancersThe exopolysaccharides of the strain have immunomodulatory and antitumor activities; regulate the TLR2/STAT-3/P38-MAPK pathway associated with inflammation against HCC.[63]
L. acidophilus NCFMStimulate the immune response; reduce the activities of β-glucuronase, nitroreductase, azoreductase and other microbial enzymes; produce compounds that inhibit tumor proliferation; reduce the incidence of colon cancer and inhibit the growth of colon tumors.[24, 25]
L. acidophilus NCFMRegulate immune capacityReduce levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines significantly and mobilize a systemic immune response; limit pathogen colonization in the body, control metabolic disorders.[47, 64, 65]
L. acidophilus ATCC314Manage inflammatory disordersRegulate the secretion of inflammatory cytokines; reduce oxidative stress.[70]

References

  1. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, et al. 2014. Expert consensus document. The international scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11: 506-514.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Butel MJ. 2014. Probiotics, gut microbiota and health. Med. Mal. Infect. 44: 1-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Saini R, Saini S, Sugandha. 2009. Probiotics: the health boosters. J. Cutan. Aesthet. Surg. 2: 112.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Shah NP. 2007. Functional cultures and health benefits. Int. Dairy J. 17: 1262-1277.
    CrossRef
  5. Mital BK, Garg SK. 1995. Anticarcinogenic, hypocholesterolemic, and antagonistic activities of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 21: 175-214.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Saxelin M, Tynkkynen S, Mattila-Sandholm T, de Vos WM. 2005. Probiotic and other functional microbes: from markets to mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16: 204-211.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Bull M, Plummer S, Marchesi J, Mahenthiralingam E. 2013. The life history of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a probiotic: a tale of revisionary taxonomy, misidentification and commercial success. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 349: 77-87.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Altermann E, Russell WM, Azcarate-Peril MA, Barrangou R, Buck BL, McAuliffe O, et al. 2005. Complete genome sequence of the probiotic lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 3906-3912.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Azcarate-Peril MA, Altermann E, Hoover-Fitzula RL, Cano RJ, Klaenhammer TR. 2004. Identification and inactivation of genetic loci involved with Lactobacillus acidophilus acid tolerance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 5315-5322.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Claesson MJ, van Sinderen D, O'Toole PW. 2007. The genus Lactobacillus--a genomic basis for understanding its diversity. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 269: 22-28.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Azcarate-Peril MA, McAuliffe O, Altermann E, Lick S, Russell WM, Klaenhammer TR. 2005. Microarray analysis of a twocomponent regulatory system involved in acid resistance and proteolytic activity in Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 5794-5804.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  12. Pfeiler EA, Klaenhammer TR. 2009. Role of transporter proteins in bile tolerance of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 6013-6016.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Khaleghi M, Kermanshahi RK, Yaghoobi MM, Zarkesh-Esfahani SH, Baghizadeh A. 2010. Assessment of bile salt effects on s-layer production, slp gene expression and some physicochemical properties of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 20: 749-756.
  14. Buck BL, Altermann E, Svingerud T, Klaenhammer TR. 2005. Functional analysis of putative adhesion factors in Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 8344-8351.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Sanders ME, Klaenhammer TR. 2001. Invited review: the scientific basis of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM functionality as a probiotic. J. Dairy Sci. 84: 319-331.
    CrossRef
  16. Sanders ME, Walker DC, Walker KM, Aoyama K, Klaenhammer TR. 1996. Performance of commercial cultures in fluid milk applications. J. Dairy Sci. 79: 943-955.
    CrossRef
  17. Shah NP. 2000. Probiotic bacteria: selective enumeration and survival in dairy foods. J. Dairy Sci. 83: 894-907.
    CrossRef
  18. Bron PA, van Baarlen P, Kleerebezem M. 2011. Emerging molecular insights into the interaction between probiotics and the host intestinal mucosa. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10: 66-78.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Gilliland SE. 1989. Acidophilus milk products: a review of potential benefits to consumers. J. Dairy Sci. 72: 2483-2494.
    CrossRef
  20. Wang KY, Li SN, Liu CS, Perng DS, Su YC, Wu DC, et al. 2004. Effects of ingesting Lactobacillus- and Bifidobacterium-containing yogurt in subjects with colonized Helicobacter pylori. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 80: 737-741.
  21. Tegegne BA, Kebede B. 2022. Probiotics, their prophylactic and therapeutic applications in human health development: a review of the literature. Heliyon 8: e09725.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Reid G, Jass J, Sebulsky MT, McCormick JK. 2003. Potential uses of probiotics in clinical practice. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16: 658-672.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Bennett A, Eley KG. 1976. Intestinal pH and propulsion: an explanation of diarrhoea in lactase deficiency and laxation by lactulose. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 28: 192-195.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Goldin BR, Gorbach SL. 1980. Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus dietary supplements on 1,2-dimethylhydrazine dihydrochlorideinduced intestinal cancer in rats. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 64: 263-265.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Goldin BR, Gorbach SL. 1984. The effect of milk and lactobacillus feeding on human intestinal bacterial enzyme activity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 39: 756-761.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Chang JH, Shim YY, Cha SK, Reaney MJT, Chee KM. 2012. Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus KFRI342 on the development of chemically induced precancerous growths in the rat colon. J. Med. Microbiol. 61: 361-368.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Singh VP, Sharma J, Babu S, Rizwanulla, Singla A. 2013. Role of probiotics in health and disease: a review. J. Pak Med. Assoc. 63: 253-257.
  28. Kopp-Hoolihan L. 2001. Prophylactic and therapeutic uses of probiotics: a review. J. Am. Diet Assoc. 101: 229-238.
    CrossRef
  29. Oh JK, Kim YR, Lee B, Choi YM, Kim SH. 2021. Prevention of cholesterol gallstone formation by Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121 and Lactobacillus fermentum MF27 in lithogenic diet-induced mice. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 41: 343-352.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Lee NY, Shin MJ, Youn GS, Yoon SJ, Choi YR, Kim HS, et al. 2021. Lactobacillus attenuates progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by lowering cholesterol and steatosis. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 27: 110-124.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Huang Y, Wang J, Quan G, Wang X, Yang L, Zhong L. 2014. Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 prevents atherosclerosis via inhibition of intestinal cholesterol absorption in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80: 7496-7504.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Wang L, Zhou B, Zhou X, Wang Y, Wang H, Jia S, et al. 2019. Combined lowering effects of rosuvastatin and L. acidophilus on cholesterol levels in rat. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 29: 473-481.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Lloyd-Jones DM. 2010. Cardiovascular risk prediction: basic concepts, current status, and future directions. Circulation 121: 1768-1777.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. Tan WQ, Wang JX, Lin ZQ, Li YR, Lin Y, Li PF. 2008. Novel cardiac apoptotic pathway: the dephosphorylation of apoptosis repressor with caspase recruitment domain by calcineurin. Circulation 118: 2268-2276.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Ding SL, Wang JX, Jiao JQ, Tu X, Wang Q, Liu F, et al. 2013. A pre-microRNA-149 (miR-149) genetic variation affects miR-149 maturation and its ability to regulate the Puma protein in apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 288: 26865-26877.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  36. Xue S, Liu D, Zhu W, Su Z, Zhang L, Zhou C, et al. 2019. Circulating MiR-17-5p, MiR-126-5p and MiR-145-3p are novel biomarkers for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Front. Physiol. 10: 123.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  37. Mann GV. 1974. Studies of a surfactant and cholesteremia in the Maasai. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 27: 464-469.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Harrison VC, Peat G. 1975. Serum cholesterol and bowel flora in the newborn. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 28: 1351-1355.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Stepankova R, Tonar Z, Bartova J, Nedorost L, Rossman P, Poledne R, et al. 2010. Absence of microbiota (germ-free conditions) accelerates the atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice fed standard low cholesterol diet. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 17: 796-804.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. Gilliland SE, Walker DK. 1990. Factors to consider when selecting a culture of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a dietary adjunct to produce a hypocholesterolemic effect in humans. J. Dairy Sci. 73: 905-911.
    CrossRef
  41. Gilliland SE, Nelson CR, Maxwell C. 1985. Assimilation of cholesterol by Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49: 377-381.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  42. Park YH, Kim JG, Shin YW, Kim SH, Whang KY. 2007. Effect of dietary inclusion of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121 on cholesterol metabolism in rats. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 17: 655-662.
  43. Park YH, Kim JG, Shin YW, Kim HS, Kim YJ, Chun T, et al. 2008. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus 43121 and a mixture of Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium longum on the serum cholesterol level and fecal sterol excretion in hypercholesterolemiainduced pigs. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 72: 595-600.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  44. Song M, Park S, Lee H, Min B, Jung S, Park S, et al. 2015. Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus NS1 on plasma cholesterol levels in dietinduced obese mice. J. Dairy Sci. 98: 1492-1501.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  45. Huang Y, Wang J, Cheng Y, Zheng Y. 2010. The hypocholesterolaemic effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus American type culture collection 4356 in rats are mediated by the down-regulation of Niemann-Pick C1-like 1. Br. J. Nutr. 104: 807-812.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  46. Chen L, Liu W, Li Y, Luo S, Liu Q, Zhong Y, et al. 2013. Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 attenuates the atherosclerotic progression through modulation of oxidative stress and inflammatory process. Int. Immunopharmacol. 17: 108-115.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  47. Lightfoot YL, Selle K, Yang T, Goh YJ, Sahay B, Zadeh M, et al. 2015. SIGNR3-dependent immune regulation by Lactobacillus acidophilus surface layer protein A in colitis. EMBO J. 34: 881-895.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  48. Chandhni PR, Pradhan D, Sowmya K, Gupta S, Kadyan S, Choudhary R, et al. 2021. Ameliorative effect of surface proteins of probiotic Lactobacilli in colitis mouse models. Front. Microbiol. 12: 679773.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  49. Wu Z, Pan DD, Guo Y, Zeng X. 2013. Structure and anti-inflammatory capacity of peptidoglycan from Lactobacillus acidophilus in RAW-264.7 cells. Carbohydr. Polym. 96: 466-473.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. Moshiri M, Dallal MMS, Rezaei F, Douraghi M, Sharifi L, Noroozbabaei Z, et al. 2017. The effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus PTCC 1643 on cultured intestinal epithelial cells infected with Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis. Osong. Public Health Res. Perspect 8: 54-60.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  51. Simenhoff ML, Dunn SR, Zollner GP, Fitzpatrick ME, Emery SM, Sandine WE, et al. 1996. Biomodulation of the toxic and nutritional effects of small bowel bacterial overgrowth in end-stage kidney disease using freeze-dried Lactobacillus acidophilus. Miner. Electrolyte Metab. 22: 92-96.
  52. Dunn SR, Simenhoff ML, Ahmed KE, Gaughan WJ, Eltayeb BO, Fitzpatrick MED, et al. 1998. Effect of oral administration of freezedried Lactobacillus acidophilus on small bowel bacterial overgrowth in patients with end stage kidney disease: Reducing uremic toxins and improving nutrition. Int. Dairy J. 8: 545-553.
    CrossRef
  53. Shah N. 1993. Effectiveness of dairy-products in alleviation of lactose-intolerance. Food Aust. 45: 268-271.
  54. Lin MY, Yen CL, Chen SH. 1998. Management of lactose maldigestion by consuming milk containing lactobacilli. Dig. Dis. Sci. 43: 133-137.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  55. Mustapha A, Jiang T, Savaiano DA. 1997. Improvement of lactose digestion by humans following ingestion of unfermented acidophilus milk: influence of bile sensitivity, lactose transport, and acid tolerance of Lactobacillus acidophilus. J. Dairy Sci. 80: 1537-1545.
    CrossRef
  56. Kim HS, Gilliland SE. 1983. Lactobacillus acidophilus as a dietary adjunct for milk to aid lactose digestion in humans. J. Dairy Sci. 66: 959-966.
    CrossRef
  57. Montes RG, Bayless TM, Saavedra JM, Perman JA. 1995. Effect of milks inoculated with Lactobacillus acidophilus or a yogurt starter culture in lactose-maldigesting children. J. Dairy Sci. 78: 1657-1664.
    CrossRef
  58. Pakdaman MN, Udani JK, Molina JP, Shahani M. 2016. The effects of the DDS-1 strain of lactobacillus on symptomatic relief for lactose intolerance - a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover clinical trial. Nutr. J. 15: 56.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  59. Newcomer AD, Park HS, O'Brien PC, McGill DB. 1983. Response of patients with irritable bowel syndrome and lactase deficiency using unfermented acidophilus milk. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 38: 257-263.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  60. McDonough FE, Hitchins AD, Wong NP, Wells P, Bodwell CE. 1987. Modification of sweet acidophilus milk to improve utilization by lactose-intolerant persons. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 45: 570-574.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  61. Payne DL, Welsh JD, Manion CV, Tsegaye A, Herd LD. 1981. Effectiveness of milk products in dietary management of lactose malabsorption. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 34: 2711-2715.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  62. El-Deeb NM, Yassin AM, Al-Madboly LA, El-Hawiet A. 2018. A novel purified Lactobacillus acidophilus 20079 exopolysaccharide, LA-EPS-20079, molecularly regulates both apoptotic and NF-kappaB inflammatory pathways in human colon cancer. Microb. Cell Fact. 17: 29.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  63. Khedr OMS, El-Sonbaty SM, Moawed FSM, Kandil EI, Abdel-Maksoud BE. 2021. Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 exopolysaccharides suppresses mediators of inflammation through the inhibition of TLR2/STAT-3/P38-MAPK pathway in DENinduced hepatocarcinogenesis in rats. Nutr. Cancer 74: 1037-1047.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  64. Wagner RD, Pierson C, Warner T, Dohnalek M, Farmer J, Roberts L, et al. 1997. Biotherapeutic effects of probiotic bacteria on candidiasis in immunodeficient mice. Infect. Immun. 65: 4165-4172.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  65. Tejada-Simon MV, Lee JH, Ustunol Z, Pestka JJ. 1999. Ingestion of yogurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium to potentiate immunoglobulin A responses to cholera toxin in mice. J. Dairy Sci. 82: 649-660.
    CrossRef
  66. Yang Y, Song M, Liu Y, Liu H, Sun L, Peng Y, et al. 2016. Renoprotective approaches and strategies in acute kidney injury. Pharmacol. Ther. 163: 58-73.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  67. Zhang P, Han X, Zhang X, Zhu X. 2021. Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 alleviates renal ischemia-reperfusion injury through antioxidant stress and anti-inflammatory responses and improves intestinal microbial distribution. Front. Nutr. 8: 667695.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  68. Sadeghzadeh J, Vakili A, Sameni HR, Shadnoush M, Bandegi AR, Zahedi Khorasani M. 2017. The effect of oral consumption of probiotics in prevention of heart injury in a rat myocardial infarction model: A histopathological, hemodynamic and biochemical evaluation. Iran Biomed J. 21: 174-181.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  69. Reid G. 2000. In vitro testing of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM (TM) as a possible probiotic for the urogenital tract. Int. Dairy J. 10: 415-419.
    CrossRef
  70. Amdekar S, Singh V, Kumar A, Sharma P, Singh R. 2013. Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus acidophilus regulate inflammatory pathway and improve antioxidant status in collagen-induced arthritic rats. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 33: 1-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  71. Paul AK, Paul A, Jahan R, Jannat K, Bondhon TA, Hasan A, et al. 2021. Probiotics and amelioration of rheumatoid arthritis: Significant roles of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Microorganisms 9: 1070.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  72. Holzapfel WH, Schillinger U. 2002. Introduction to pre- and probiotics. Food Res. Int. 35: 109-116.
    CrossRef
  73. Marteau P, Boutron-Ruault MC. 2002. Nutritional advantages of probiotics and prebiotics. Br. J. Nutr. 87 Suppl 2: S153-157.
    CrossRef