Articles Service
Research article
Bactericidal Effect of Cecropin A Fused Endolysin on Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens
1Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin 17035, Republic of Korea
2LyseNTech Co., Ltd., Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13486, Republic of Korea
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022; 32(6): 816-823
Published June 28, 2022 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2205.05009
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Abstract
Keywords
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
Development of novel antibiotics relies on the finding of natural compounds and synthetic modification of them but the number of new antibiotics gradually decreased due to a shortage of mined natural compounds [1, 2]. Given this situation, the rapid emergence and spread of resistance to antibiotics resulting from overuse and misuse in both livestock and medical fields have become a major threat to public health in recent years [3, 4]. Moreover, multi-drug resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant strains are quickly rising, which highlights the urgent need for new treatment options for infectious diseases [5, 6].
Bacteriophages and their endolysins have been considered an alternative agent for the control of bacterial infection. Bacteriophages infect and lyse the host bacteria after replication inside during their life cycle. Many attempts have been made to develop phage therapy as a treatment option for multi-drug resistant bacteria [7–9]. However, it was also reported that bacteria can resist bacteriophage infection through various mechanisms [10–12]. Therefore, more attention has been paid to endolysin, which is a peptidoglycan-degrading enzyme produced by bacteriophages at the end of the lytic cycle to hydrolyze the bacterial cell wall for the release of progeny phage [13]. It has been demonstrated that purified endolysins were found to have strong antibacterial activity against gram-positive pathogens when applied extracellularly [14, 15]. Currently, the first endolysin drug, CF-301, targeting
However, the activity of endolysin is much less effective against gram-negative bacteria due to the outer membrane, which prevents access of endolysin to peptidoglycan. By introducing outer membrane-disrupting peptides or polycationic peptides, the engineered endolysin was expanded to the treatment of gram-negative pathogens [18, 19]. Antimicrobial peptide (AMP) is found in nature and is part of the innate immune system of different organisms with the membrane-disrupting ability [20]. Cecropins were originally isolated from the insect
In this study, we identified the novel endolysin ST01 gene from the genome of the newly isolated
Materials and Method
Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions
The bacterial strains used in this study were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), the Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC), and the Culture Collection of Antimicrobial Resistance Microbes (CCARM). F strains were generous gifts from Professor Kwan Soo Ko (Sungkyunkwan University).
Genome analysis of Bacteriophage PBST08 and Bioinformatic Analysis of Endolysin ST01
The bacteriophage was isolated from Yeongsan River, Jeollanam-do, Korea by the soft agar overlay method [24]. Briefly, a single plaque was selected from the overlaid LB top agar (final 0.7 %) containing a mixture of wastewater and cultured
Endolysin Overexpression and Purification
The ORF114 encoding endolysin ST01 was amplified using the following primers: forward 5’-atgc
BL21 (DE3) pLysS carrying pAS008 or pAS047 was grown in 1.5 L of LB broth containing ampicillin and chloramphenicol at 37°C. When optical density at 600 nm (OD600) reached 0.6, IPTG (1 mM) was added for the induction of the recombinant protein and further incubated at 37°C for 5 h for ST01 or at 18°C for 21 h for CecA::ST01. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3,500 ×
Plate Lysis Assay
Overnight culture of
CFU Reduction Assay
The antibacterial activity of ST01 or CecA::ST01 was determined using
Galleria mellonlella Infection Models
Healthy
Measurement of Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)
The MIC values of CecA::ST01 were determined by broth microdilution method in 96-well plates as described in [23] with the strains of
Statistical Analysis
Data was analyzed using GraphPad Prism software version 9.3.0. A two-tailed Student’s t-test was used for the analysis of the differences between each dataset and a log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used for survival experiments. All data were presented as mean ± SD, and differences were considered significant at
Results
Identification of Novel Endolysin ST01 from Salmonella typhimurium Phage PBST08
A putative endolysin was predicted from the newly isolated bacteriophage PBST08 using
-
Fig. 1. Identification of novel phage endolysin ST01.
(A) Cladogram of ST01 with 18 proteins using the Constraint-based Multiple Alignment Tool (COBALT). (B) Multiple alignment analysis of amino acid sequence of ST01 with
Salmonella phage vB_SenS_ER21 lysozyme,Salmonella virus VSe101 lysin, andSalmonella phage vB_SenS_ER22 lysozyme. The alignment was performed using ClustalW. Black boxes represent 100% sequence identity. (C) The domain structure of ST01 was predicted by the InterPro tool. The predicted lysozyme-like domain is located between amino acid 34 and 140 of ST01.
To verify the predicted function of ST01, ORF114 was cloned into pET21a and the resulting plasmid pAS008 was then transformed into BL21 (DE3) strain. The BL21(DE3) strain carrying pAS008 was tested for endolysin activity by plate lysis assay using the autoclaved culture of
-
Fig. 2. Lytic activity of ST01 against
S. typhimurium . (A) The peptidoglycan-degrading activity of ST01 was determined by plate lysis assay using a plate containing an autoclaved culture ofSalmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028. SoluBL21 carrying pET21a (Empty) or pAS008 was grown in LB containing ampicillin until culture reached the midexponential phase and expression of ST01 was induced with the addition of 0 mM (-) or 1 mM IPTG (+). After 6 h culture at 37°C, 1 μl of each culture was spotted on the plate and air dried. The plates were incubated at 37°C overnight. The clear zone represents the lytic activity of ST01. (B) The antimicrobial activity of ST01 againstS. typhimurium ATCC 14028 was tested by CFU reduction assay. Exponentially grown bacterial cells were adjusted as 1 × 106 CFU in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5 and treated with 0, 0.2, and 2 μM of purified ST01 at 37°C for 2 h. The surviving bacterial cells were counted by plating on an LB plate. (C) The antimicrobial activity of ST01 was tested againstP. aeruginosa PA01, A.baumannii ATCC 17978,K. pneumonia KCTC 2208,E. coli ATCC 8739,E. aerogenes F276,E. cloacae ATCC 13047 by CFU reduction assay. The bacterial cells were prepared as described above and treated with 0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1 μM of ST01. The experiments were repeated at least three times and data are presented as mean ± SD. Significance is shown as *p < 0.0392; **p < 0.0074; n.s. = not significant.
Engineering of ST01 by a Fusion with Cecropin A
Although the endolysin activity of ST01 was verified, the lytic activity against gram-negative pathogens was low. Since the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria blocks the interaction between the peptidoglycan substate and endolysin, membrane-destabilizing peptide cecropin A (CecA) was fused to the N-terminus of ST01, CecA::ST01, to improve antibacterial activity. Of note, CecA itself could decrease the bacterial number up to 2 logs and CecA fused EGFP did not show any antibacterial activity in our previous study [23]. The purified CecA::ST01 was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and degradation or impurity was not detected (Fig. S2). As shown in Fig. 3A, the bacteriolytic activity of ST01 was dramatically enhanced by the introduction of CecA when it was applied to
-
Fig. 3. Evaluation of lytic activity of CecA::ST01 against
A. baumannii in vitro and in vivo. (A). The antibacterial activity of CecA::ST01 was determined usingS. typhimurium ATCC 14028 andA. baumannii ATCC 17978. Each bacterial suspension in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5 was treated with 0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 μM of CecA::ST01. Significance is indicated as **P <0.006; *P <0.0106. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) (B). Survival rates ofA. baumannii ATCC 17978 infected larvae ofG. mellonella treated with no (mock) or 5 μM of CecA::ST01. The larvae were infected by 2 × 106 CFU ofA. baumannii ATCC 17978. For endolysin treatment, 5 μM of CecA::ST01 was mixed with bacterial suspension immediately before injection. The survival of larvae was monitored by the time the larvae were kept at 30°C for 72 h (n = 10 per group). The experiment was repeated three times. Significance is shown as ****p < 0.0001. (C) The lytic activity of CecA::ST01 was determined using the clinical isolate ofA. baumannii , CCARM 12026 by CFU reduction assay. Significance is indicated as *p < 0.0201. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) (D). The larvae ofG. mellonella was infected by 2 × 106 CFU ofA. baumannii CCARM 12026. For endolysin treatment, 5 μM of CecA::ST01 was mixed with bacterial suspension immediately before injection. As a control, the same amount of 1×PBS was used (mock). The survival of larvae was monitored by the time the larvae were kept at 37°C for 72 h (n = 10 per group). The experiment was repeated three times. Significance is shown as ***p < 0.0009.
Control of Multi-Drug Resistant A. baumannii Infection by CecA::ST01
Since the potential of CecA::ST01 as an alternative antibiotic was validated using laboratory strain, the antibacterial activity was further investigated using the clinical isolate of
Antibacterial Spectrum of CecA::ST01 against Gram-Negative Pathogens
Since the efficacy was validated against the representative gram-negative pathogen
-
Table 1 . MIC values of CecA::ST01 against gram-negative pathogens.
Bacterial strains MIC (μg/ml) Bacterial strains MIC (μg/ml) P. aeruginosa E. cloacae PAO1 32 ATCC 13047 8 ATCC 13388 >128 CCARM 16012 64 ATCC 9027 >128 CCARM 16014 16 ATCC 27853 32 CCARM 16017 16 F341 >128 CCARM 0252 4 CCARM 2092 >128 CCARM 16003 4 CCARM 2134 64 K. pneumoniae A. baumannii KCTC 2208 4 ATCC 19606 4 ATCC 700603 16 ATCC 17978 4 CCARM 10143 16 F66 4 CCARM 10225 16 F68 4 CCARM 10236 16 CCARM 12026 8 CCARM 10269 8 CCARM 12035 8 E. coli ATCC 8739 8 ATCC 25922 4 F906 8 CCARM 1A746 4 CCARM 1B684 4 CCARM 1460 4
Discussion
Bacteriophage-encoded endolysin is a promising antibacterial with high specificity and low resistance potential that degrades the peptidoglycan of the cell wall with enzymatic activity [29]. However, accessibility to its substrate, peptidoglycan, restricts the enzymatic activity of endolysin in the case of gram-negative bacteria protected by a thick outer membrane [30]. By engineering natural endolysin, the endolysin could penetrate the outer membrane and then degrade its substrate where the fused peptide can disrupt the major component of the outer membrane such as lipopolysaccharide [18, 31, 32]. Therefore, mining new endolysins followed by intensive engineering can provide new treatments for infection by drug-resistant gram-negative pathogens. In an attempt to develop a newly engineered endolysin, we first identified a novel endolysin gene with a lysozyme-like domain, ST01, by bioinformatic analysis of the genome of the new
Supplemental Materials
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korean government (2021R1F1A1060072 and 2019M3E5D5066666), and by the Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund (of 2022).
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
References
- Ligon BL. 2004. Penicillin: its discovery and early development.
Semin. Pediatr. Infect. Dis 15 : 52-57. - Lewis K. 2012. Antibiotics: recover the lost art of drug discovery.
Nature 485 : 439-440. - Martínez JL, Baquero F. 2014. Emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance: setting a parameter space.
Ups. J. Med. Sci. 119 : 68-77. - Jim O'Neill. 2016. Nat.
Rev. Drug Discov. 15 : 526. - Magiorakos A-P, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG,
et al . 2012. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drugresistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance.Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 18 : 268-281. - Bassetti M, Righi E, Vena A, Graziano E, Russo A, Peghin M. 2018. Risk stratification and treatment of ICU-acquired pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant/pandrug-resistant bacteria.
Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 24 : 385-393. - Chegini Z, Khoshbayan A, Vesal S, Moradabadi A, Hashemi A, Shariati A. 2021. Bacteriophage therapy for inhibition of multi drugresistant uropathogenic bacteria: a narrative review.
Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 20 : 30. - Bhargava K, Nath G, Bhargava A, Aseri GK, Jain N. 2021. Phage therapeutics: from promises to practices and prospectives.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 105 : 9047-9067. - Mousavi SM, Babakhani S, Moradi L, Karami S, Shahbandeh M, Mirshekar M,
et al . 2021. Bacteriophage as a novel therapeutic weapon for killing colistin-resistant multi-drug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.Curr. Microbiol. 78 : 4023-4036. - Labrie SJ, Samson JE, Moineau S. 2010. Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms.
Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8 : 317-327. - Meile S, Du J, Dunne M, Kilcher S, Loessner MJ. 2021. Engineering therapeutic phages for enhanced antibacterial efficacy.
Curr. Opin. Virol. 52 : 182-191. - Samson JE, Magadán AH, Sabri M, Moineau S. 2013. Revenge of the phages: defeating bacterial defences.
Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11 : 675-687. - Young I, Wang I, Roof WD. 2000. Phages will out: strategies of host cell lysis.
Trends Microbiol. 8 : 120-128. - Nelson D, Loomis L, Fischetti VA. 2001. Prevention and elimination of upper respiratory colonization of mice by group A streptococci by using a bacteriophage lytic enzyme.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 : 4107-4112. - Jado I, López R, García E, Fenoll A, Casal J, García P,
et al . 2003. Phage lytic enzymes as therapy for antibiotic-resistantStreptococcus pneumoniae infection in a murine sepsis model.J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52 : 967-973. - Traczewski MM, Ambler JE, Schuch R. 2021. Determination of MIC quality control parameters for exebacase, a novel lysin with antistaphylococcal activity.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 59 : e0311720. - Nelson DC, Schmelcher M, Rodriguez-Rubio L, Klumpp J, Pritchard DG, Dong S,
et al . 2012. Endolysins as antimicrobials.Adv. Virus Res. 83 : 299-365. - Briers Y, Walmagh M, Van Puyenbroeck V, Cornelissen A, Cenens W, Aertsen A,
et al . 2014. Engineered endolysin-based 'Artilysins' to combat multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens.mBio 5 : e01379-01314. - Briers Y, Walmagh M, Grymonprez B, Biebl M, Pirnay J-P, Defraine V,
et al . 2014. Art-175 is a highly efficient antibacterial against multidrug-resistant strains and persisters ofPseudomonas aeruginosa .Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58 : 3774-3784. - Saeed SI, Mergani A, Aklilu E, Kamaruzzman NF. 2022. Antimicrobial peptides: bringing solution to the rising threats of antimicrobial resistance in livestock.
Front. Vet. Sci. 9 : 851052. - Moore AJ, Beazley WD, Bibby MC, Devine DA. 1996. Antimicrobial activity of cecropins.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 37 : 1077-1089. - Abdelkader K, Gutiérrez D, Tamés-Caunedo H, Ruas-Madiedo P, Safaan A, Khairalla AS,
et al . 2022. Engineering a lysin with intrinsic antibacterial activity (LysMK34) by cecropin A fusion enhances its antibacterial properties againstAcinetobacter baumannii .Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 88 : e0151521. - Hong H-W, Kim YD, Jang J, Kim MS, Song M, Myung H. 2022. Combination effect of engineered endolysin EC340 with antibiotics.
Front. Microbiol. 13 : 821936. - Hockett KL, Baltrus DA. 2017. Use of the soft-agar overlay technique to screen for bacterially produced inhibitory compounds.
J. Vis. Exp. 14 : 55064. - Kim MS, Kim YD, Hong SS, Park K, Ko KS, Myung H. 2015. Phage-encoded colanic acid-degrading enzyme permits lytic phage infection of a capsule-forming resistant mutant
Escherichia coli strain.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81 : 900-909. - Gouet P, Courcelle E, Stuart DI, Métoz F. 1999. ESPript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript.
Bioinformatics 15 : 305-308. - Sievers F, Higgins DG. 2018. Clustal Omega for making accurate alignments of many protein sequences.
Protein Sci. 27 : 135-145. - Quevillon E, Silventoinen V, Pillai S, Harte N, Mulder N, Apweiler R,
et al . 2005. InterProScan: protein domains identifier.Nucleic Acids Res. 33 : W116-120. - Blasco L, Ambroa A, Trastoy R, Bleriot I, Moscoso M, Fernández-Garcia L,
et al . 2020. In vitro and in vivo efficacy of combinations of colistin and different endolysins against clinical strains of multi-drug resistant pathogens.Sci. Rep. 10 : 7163. - Murray E, Draper LA, Ross RP, Hill C. 2021. The advantages and challenges of using endolysins in a clinical setting.
Viruses 13 : 680. - Gerstmans H, Rodríguez-Rubio L, Lavigne R, Briers Y. 2016. From endolysins to Artilysin®s: novel enzyme-based approaches to kill drug-resistant bacteria.
Biochem. Soc. Trans 44 : 123-128. - Briers Y, Lavigne R. 2015. Breaking barriers: expansion of the use of endolysins as novel antibacterials against Gram-negative bacteria.
Future Microbiol. 10 : 377-390.
Related articles in JMB
Article
Research article
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022; 32(6): 816-823
Published online June 28, 2022 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2205.05009
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Bactericidal Effect of Cecropin A Fused Endolysin on Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens
Jeonghyun Lim1, Juyeon Hong1, Yongwon Jung1, Jaewon Ha1, Hwan Kim1, Heejoon Myung1,2, and Miryoung Song1*
1Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin 17035, Republic of Korea
2LyseNTech Co., Ltd., Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13486, Republic of Korea
Correspondence to:Miryoung Song, songm@hufs.ac.kr
Abstract
The rapid spread of superbugs leads to the escalation of infectious diseases, which threatens public health. Endolysins derived from bacteriophages are spotlighted as promising alternative antibiotics against multi-drug resistant bacteria. In this study, we isolated and characterized the novel Salmonella typhimurium phage PBST08. Bioinformatics analysis of the PBST08 genome revealed putative endolysin ST01 with a lysozyme-like domain. Since the lytic activity of the purified ST01 was minor, probably owing to the outer membrane, which blocks accessibility to peptidoglycan, antimicrobial peptide cecropin A (CecA) was fused to the N-terminus of ST01 to disrupt the outer membrane. The resulting CecA::ST01 has been shown to have increased bactericidal activity against gram-negative pathogens including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, and Enterobacter cloacae and the most affected target was A. baumannii. In the presence of 0.25 μM CecA::ST01, A. baumannii ATCC 17978 strain was completely killed and CCARM 12026 strain was wiped out by 0.5 μM CecA::ST01, which is a clinical isolate of A. baumannii and resistant to multiple drugs including carbapenem. Moreover, the larvae of Galleria mellonella could be rescued up to 58% or 49% by the administration of CecA::ST01 upon infection by A. baumannii 17978 or CCARM 12026 strain. Finally, the antibacterial activity of CecA::ST01 was verified using 31 strains of five gram-negative pathogens by evaluation of minimal inhibitory concentration. Thus, the results indicate that a fusion of antimicrobial peptide to endolysin can enhance antibacterial activity and the spectrum of endolysin where multi-drug resistant gram-negative pathogens can be efficiently controlled.
Keywords: Endolysin, antimicrobial peptide, bacteriophage, gram-negative pathogens, multiple-drug resistance
Introduction
Development of novel antibiotics relies on the finding of natural compounds and synthetic modification of them but the number of new antibiotics gradually decreased due to a shortage of mined natural compounds [1, 2]. Given this situation, the rapid emergence and spread of resistance to antibiotics resulting from overuse and misuse in both livestock and medical fields have become a major threat to public health in recent years [3, 4]. Moreover, multi-drug resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant strains are quickly rising, which highlights the urgent need for new treatment options for infectious diseases [5, 6].
Bacteriophages and their endolysins have been considered an alternative agent for the control of bacterial infection. Bacteriophages infect and lyse the host bacteria after replication inside during their life cycle. Many attempts have been made to develop phage therapy as a treatment option for multi-drug resistant bacteria [7–9]. However, it was also reported that bacteria can resist bacteriophage infection through various mechanisms [10–12]. Therefore, more attention has been paid to endolysin, which is a peptidoglycan-degrading enzyme produced by bacteriophages at the end of the lytic cycle to hydrolyze the bacterial cell wall for the release of progeny phage [13]. It has been demonstrated that purified endolysins were found to have strong antibacterial activity against gram-positive pathogens when applied extracellularly [14, 15]. Currently, the first endolysin drug, CF-301, targeting
However, the activity of endolysin is much less effective against gram-negative bacteria due to the outer membrane, which prevents access of endolysin to peptidoglycan. By introducing outer membrane-disrupting peptides or polycationic peptides, the engineered endolysin was expanded to the treatment of gram-negative pathogens [18, 19]. Antimicrobial peptide (AMP) is found in nature and is part of the innate immune system of different organisms with the membrane-disrupting ability [20]. Cecropins were originally isolated from the insect
In this study, we identified the novel endolysin ST01 gene from the genome of the newly isolated
Materials and Method
Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions
The bacterial strains used in this study were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), the Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC), and the Culture Collection of Antimicrobial Resistance Microbes (CCARM). F strains were generous gifts from Professor Kwan Soo Ko (Sungkyunkwan University).
Genome analysis of Bacteriophage PBST08 and Bioinformatic Analysis of Endolysin ST01
The bacteriophage was isolated from Yeongsan River, Jeollanam-do, Korea by the soft agar overlay method [24]. Briefly, a single plaque was selected from the overlaid LB top agar (final 0.7 %) containing a mixture of wastewater and cultured
Endolysin Overexpression and Purification
The ORF114 encoding endolysin ST01 was amplified using the following primers: forward 5’-atgc
BL21 (DE3) pLysS carrying pAS008 or pAS047 was grown in 1.5 L of LB broth containing ampicillin and chloramphenicol at 37°C. When optical density at 600 nm (OD600) reached 0.6, IPTG (1 mM) was added for the induction of the recombinant protein and further incubated at 37°C for 5 h for ST01 or at 18°C for 21 h for CecA::ST01. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3,500 ×
Plate Lysis Assay
Overnight culture of
CFU Reduction Assay
The antibacterial activity of ST01 or CecA::ST01 was determined using
Galleria mellonlella Infection Models
Healthy
Measurement of Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)
The MIC values of CecA::ST01 were determined by broth microdilution method in 96-well plates as described in [23] with the strains of
Statistical Analysis
Data was analyzed using GraphPad Prism software version 9.3.0. A two-tailed Student’s t-test was used for the analysis of the differences between each dataset and a log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used for survival experiments. All data were presented as mean ± SD, and differences were considered significant at
Results
Identification of Novel Endolysin ST01 from Salmonella typhimurium Phage PBST08
A putative endolysin was predicted from the newly isolated bacteriophage PBST08 using
-
Figure 1. Identification of novel phage endolysin ST01.
(A) Cladogram of ST01 with 18 proteins using the Constraint-based Multiple Alignment Tool (COBALT). (B) Multiple alignment analysis of amino acid sequence of ST01 with
Salmonella phage vB_SenS_ER21 lysozyme,Salmonella virus VSe101 lysin, andSalmonella phage vB_SenS_ER22 lysozyme. The alignment was performed using ClustalW. Black boxes represent 100% sequence identity. (C) The domain structure of ST01 was predicted by the InterPro tool. The predicted lysozyme-like domain is located between amino acid 34 and 140 of ST01.
To verify the predicted function of ST01, ORF114 was cloned into pET21a and the resulting plasmid pAS008 was then transformed into BL21 (DE3) strain. The BL21(DE3) strain carrying pAS008 was tested for endolysin activity by plate lysis assay using the autoclaved culture of
-
Figure 2. Lytic activity of ST01 against
S. typhimurium . (A) The peptidoglycan-degrading activity of ST01 was determined by plate lysis assay using a plate containing an autoclaved culture ofSalmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028. SoluBL21 carrying pET21a (Empty) or pAS008 was grown in LB containing ampicillin until culture reached the midexponential phase and expression of ST01 was induced with the addition of 0 mM (-) or 1 mM IPTG (+). After 6 h culture at 37°C, 1 μl of each culture was spotted on the plate and air dried. The plates were incubated at 37°C overnight. The clear zone represents the lytic activity of ST01. (B) The antimicrobial activity of ST01 againstS. typhimurium ATCC 14028 was tested by CFU reduction assay. Exponentially grown bacterial cells were adjusted as 1 × 106 CFU in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5 and treated with 0, 0.2, and 2 μM of purified ST01 at 37°C for 2 h. The surviving bacterial cells were counted by plating on an LB plate. (C) The antimicrobial activity of ST01 was tested againstP. aeruginosa PA01, A.baumannii ATCC 17978,K. pneumonia KCTC 2208,E. coli ATCC 8739,E. aerogenes F276,E. cloacae ATCC 13047 by CFU reduction assay. The bacterial cells were prepared as described above and treated with 0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1 μM of ST01. The experiments were repeated at least three times and data are presented as mean ± SD. Significance is shown as *p < 0.0392; **p < 0.0074; n.s. = not significant.
Engineering of ST01 by a Fusion with Cecropin A
Although the endolysin activity of ST01 was verified, the lytic activity against gram-negative pathogens was low. Since the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria blocks the interaction between the peptidoglycan substate and endolysin, membrane-destabilizing peptide cecropin A (CecA) was fused to the N-terminus of ST01, CecA::ST01, to improve antibacterial activity. Of note, CecA itself could decrease the bacterial number up to 2 logs and CecA fused EGFP did not show any antibacterial activity in our previous study [23]. The purified CecA::ST01 was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and degradation or impurity was not detected (Fig. S2). As shown in Fig. 3A, the bacteriolytic activity of ST01 was dramatically enhanced by the introduction of CecA when it was applied to
-
Figure 3. Evaluation of lytic activity of CecA::ST01 against
A. baumannii in vitro and in vivo. (A). The antibacterial activity of CecA::ST01 was determined usingS. typhimurium ATCC 14028 andA. baumannii ATCC 17978. Each bacterial suspension in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5 was treated with 0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 μM of CecA::ST01. Significance is indicated as **P <0.006; *P <0.0106. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) (B). Survival rates ofA. baumannii ATCC 17978 infected larvae ofG. mellonella treated with no (mock) or 5 μM of CecA::ST01. The larvae were infected by 2 × 106 CFU ofA. baumannii ATCC 17978. For endolysin treatment, 5 μM of CecA::ST01 was mixed with bacterial suspension immediately before injection. The survival of larvae was monitored by the time the larvae were kept at 30°C for 72 h (n = 10 per group). The experiment was repeated three times. Significance is shown as ****p < 0.0001. (C) The lytic activity of CecA::ST01 was determined using the clinical isolate ofA. baumannii , CCARM 12026 by CFU reduction assay. Significance is indicated as *p < 0.0201. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) (D). The larvae ofG. mellonella was infected by 2 × 106 CFU ofA. baumannii CCARM 12026. For endolysin treatment, 5 μM of CecA::ST01 was mixed with bacterial suspension immediately before injection. As a control, the same amount of 1×PBS was used (mock). The survival of larvae was monitored by the time the larvae were kept at 37°C for 72 h (n = 10 per group). The experiment was repeated three times. Significance is shown as ***p < 0.0009.
Control of Multi-Drug Resistant A. baumannii Infection by CecA::ST01
Since the potential of CecA::ST01 as an alternative antibiotic was validated using laboratory strain, the antibacterial activity was further investigated using the clinical isolate of
Antibacterial Spectrum of CecA::ST01 against Gram-Negative Pathogens
Since the efficacy was validated against the representative gram-negative pathogen
-
Table 1 . MIC values of CecA::ST01 against gram-negative pathogens..
Bacterial strains MIC (μg/ml) Bacterial strains MIC (μg/ml) P. aeruginosa E. cloacae PAO1 32 ATCC 13047 8 ATCC 13388 >128 CCARM 16012 64 ATCC 9027 >128 CCARM 16014 16 ATCC 27853 32 CCARM 16017 16 F341 >128 CCARM 0252 4 CCARM 2092 >128 CCARM 16003 4 CCARM 2134 64 K. pneumoniae A. baumannii KCTC 2208 4 ATCC 19606 4 ATCC 700603 16 ATCC 17978 4 CCARM 10143 16 F66 4 CCARM 10225 16 F68 4 CCARM 10236 16 CCARM 12026 8 CCARM 10269 8 CCARM 12035 8 E. coli ATCC 8739 8 ATCC 25922 4 F906 8 CCARM 1A746 4 CCARM 1B684 4 CCARM 1460 4
Discussion
Bacteriophage-encoded endolysin is a promising antibacterial with high specificity and low resistance potential that degrades the peptidoglycan of the cell wall with enzymatic activity [29]. However, accessibility to its substrate, peptidoglycan, restricts the enzymatic activity of endolysin in the case of gram-negative bacteria protected by a thick outer membrane [30]. By engineering natural endolysin, the endolysin could penetrate the outer membrane and then degrade its substrate where the fused peptide can disrupt the major component of the outer membrane such as lipopolysaccharide [18, 31, 32]. Therefore, mining new endolysins followed by intensive engineering can provide new treatments for infection by drug-resistant gram-negative pathogens. In an attempt to develop a newly engineered endolysin, we first identified a novel endolysin gene with a lysozyme-like domain, ST01, by bioinformatic analysis of the genome of the new
Supplemental Materials
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korean government (2021R1F1A1060072 and 2019M3E5D5066666), and by the Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund (of 2022).
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
Fig 1.
Fig 2.
Fig 3.
-
Table 1 . MIC values of CecA::ST01 against gram-negative pathogens..
Bacterial strains MIC (μg/ml) Bacterial strains MIC (μg/ml) P. aeruginosa E. cloacae PAO1 32 ATCC 13047 8 ATCC 13388 >128 CCARM 16012 64 ATCC 9027 >128 CCARM 16014 16 ATCC 27853 32 CCARM 16017 16 F341 >128 CCARM 0252 4 CCARM 2092 >128 CCARM 16003 4 CCARM 2134 64 K. pneumoniae A. baumannii KCTC 2208 4 ATCC 19606 4 ATCC 700603 16 ATCC 17978 4 CCARM 10143 16 F66 4 CCARM 10225 16 F68 4 CCARM 10236 16 CCARM 12026 8 CCARM 10269 8 CCARM 12035 8 E. coli ATCC 8739 8 ATCC 25922 4 F906 8 CCARM 1A746 4 CCARM 1B684 4 CCARM 1460 4
References
- Ligon BL. 2004. Penicillin: its discovery and early development.
Semin. Pediatr. Infect. Dis 15 : 52-57. - Lewis K. 2012. Antibiotics: recover the lost art of drug discovery.
Nature 485 : 439-440. - Martínez JL, Baquero F. 2014. Emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance: setting a parameter space.
Ups. J. Med. Sci. 119 : 68-77. - Jim O'Neill. 2016. Nat.
Rev. Drug Discov. 15 : 526. - Magiorakos A-P, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG,
et al . 2012. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drugresistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance.Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 18 : 268-281. - Bassetti M, Righi E, Vena A, Graziano E, Russo A, Peghin M. 2018. Risk stratification and treatment of ICU-acquired pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant/pandrug-resistant bacteria.
Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 24 : 385-393. - Chegini Z, Khoshbayan A, Vesal S, Moradabadi A, Hashemi A, Shariati A. 2021. Bacteriophage therapy for inhibition of multi drugresistant uropathogenic bacteria: a narrative review.
Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 20 : 30. - Bhargava K, Nath G, Bhargava A, Aseri GK, Jain N. 2021. Phage therapeutics: from promises to practices and prospectives.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 105 : 9047-9067. - Mousavi SM, Babakhani S, Moradi L, Karami S, Shahbandeh M, Mirshekar M,
et al . 2021. Bacteriophage as a novel therapeutic weapon for killing colistin-resistant multi-drug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.Curr. Microbiol. 78 : 4023-4036. - Labrie SJ, Samson JE, Moineau S. 2010. Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms.
Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8 : 317-327. - Meile S, Du J, Dunne M, Kilcher S, Loessner MJ. 2021. Engineering therapeutic phages for enhanced antibacterial efficacy.
Curr. Opin. Virol. 52 : 182-191. - Samson JE, Magadán AH, Sabri M, Moineau S. 2013. Revenge of the phages: defeating bacterial defences.
Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11 : 675-687. - Young I, Wang I, Roof WD. 2000. Phages will out: strategies of host cell lysis.
Trends Microbiol. 8 : 120-128. - Nelson D, Loomis L, Fischetti VA. 2001. Prevention and elimination of upper respiratory colonization of mice by group A streptococci by using a bacteriophage lytic enzyme.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98 : 4107-4112. - Jado I, López R, García E, Fenoll A, Casal J, García P,
et al . 2003. Phage lytic enzymes as therapy for antibiotic-resistantStreptococcus pneumoniae infection in a murine sepsis model.J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52 : 967-973. - Traczewski MM, Ambler JE, Schuch R. 2021. Determination of MIC quality control parameters for exebacase, a novel lysin with antistaphylococcal activity.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 59 : e0311720. - Nelson DC, Schmelcher M, Rodriguez-Rubio L, Klumpp J, Pritchard DG, Dong S,
et al . 2012. Endolysins as antimicrobials.Adv. Virus Res. 83 : 299-365. - Briers Y, Walmagh M, Van Puyenbroeck V, Cornelissen A, Cenens W, Aertsen A,
et al . 2014. Engineered endolysin-based 'Artilysins' to combat multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens.mBio 5 : e01379-01314. - Briers Y, Walmagh M, Grymonprez B, Biebl M, Pirnay J-P, Defraine V,
et al . 2014. Art-175 is a highly efficient antibacterial against multidrug-resistant strains and persisters ofPseudomonas aeruginosa .Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58 : 3774-3784. - Saeed SI, Mergani A, Aklilu E, Kamaruzzman NF. 2022. Antimicrobial peptides: bringing solution to the rising threats of antimicrobial resistance in livestock.
Front. Vet. Sci. 9 : 851052. - Moore AJ, Beazley WD, Bibby MC, Devine DA. 1996. Antimicrobial activity of cecropins.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 37 : 1077-1089. - Abdelkader K, Gutiérrez D, Tamés-Caunedo H, Ruas-Madiedo P, Safaan A, Khairalla AS,
et al . 2022. Engineering a lysin with intrinsic antibacterial activity (LysMK34) by cecropin A fusion enhances its antibacterial properties againstAcinetobacter baumannii .Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 88 : e0151521. - Hong H-W, Kim YD, Jang J, Kim MS, Song M, Myung H. 2022. Combination effect of engineered endolysin EC340 with antibiotics.
Front. Microbiol. 13 : 821936. - Hockett KL, Baltrus DA. 2017. Use of the soft-agar overlay technique to screen for bacterially produced inhibitory compounds.
J. Vis. Exp. 14 : 55064. - Kim MS, Kim YD, Hong SS, Park K, Ko KS, Myung H. 2015. Phage-encoded colanic acid-degrading enzyme permits lytic phage infection of a capsule-forming resistant mutant
Escherichia coli strain.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81 : 900-909. - Gouet P, Courcelle E, Stuart DI, Métoz F. 1999. ESPript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript.
Bioinformatics 15 : 305-308. - Sievers F, Higgins DG. 2018. Clustal Omega for making accurate alignments of many protein sequences.
Protein Sci. 27 : 135-145. - Quevillon E, Silventoinen V, Pillai S, Harte N, Mulder N, Apweiler R,
et al . 2005. InterProScan: protein domains identifier.Nucleic Acids Res. 33 : W116-120. - Blasco L, Ambroa A, Trastoy R, Bleriot I, Moscoso M, Fernández-Garcia L,
et al . 2020. In vitro and in vivo efficacy of combinations of colistin and different endolysins against clinical strains of multi-drug resistant pathogens.Sci. Rep. 10 : 7163. - Murray E, Draper LA, Ross RP, Hill C. 2021. The advantages and challenges of using endolysins in a clinical setting.
Viruses 13 : 680. - Gerstmans H, Rodríguez-Rubio L, Lavigne R, Briers Y. 2016. From endolysins to Artilysin®s: novel enzyme-based approaches to kill drug-resistant bacteria.
Biochem. Soc. Trans 44 : 123-128. - Briers Y, Lavigne R. 2015. Breaking barriers: expansion of the use of endolysins as novel antibacterials against Gram-negative bacteria.
Future Microbiol. 10 : 377-390.