전체메뉴
검색
Article Search

JMB Journal of Microbiolog and Biotechnology

QR Code QR Code

Review

Molecular and Cellular Microbiology (MCM)  |  Pathogenesis and Host-Microbial interactions

Current Status of Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Therapeutics, and Vaccines for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Dae-Gyun Ahn 1, Hye-Jin Shin 1, Mi-Hwa Kim 1, 2, Sunhee Lee 1, Hae-Soo Kim 1, Jinjong Myoung 3, Bum-Tae Kim 1* and Seong-Jun Kim 1*

1Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, 2Bioenvironmental Science & Toxicology Division, Gyeongnam Branch Institute, Korea Institute of Toxicology, 3Korea Zoonosis Research Institute & Genetic Engineering Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University

Received: March 6, 2020; Accepted: March 22, 2020

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020; 30(3): 313-324

Published March 28, 2020 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2003.03011

Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causing serious respiratory illness such as pneumonia and lung failure was firstly reported in Wuhan city, the capital of Hubei, China. The etiological agent of COVID-19 has been confirmed as a novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which is most likely transmitted from zoonotic coronaviruses, similar to SARS-CoV previously emerged in 2002. Within a few months of the first report, SARS-CoV-2 has spread across China and worldwide, reaching a pandemic level. As COVID-19 has triggered enormous human casualties and serious economic loss posing global threats, it is urgent to understand the ongoing situation and to build strategies to contain the viral spread. Currently, various diagnostic kits for testing COVID-19 are available and several repurposing therapeutics for COVID-19 have shown to be clinically effective. In addition, global institutions and companies have begun to develop vaccines for the prevention of COVID-19. Here, we review current status of epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and vaccine development for the COVID-19.

Keywords

2019-nCoV, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Coronavirus, outbreak

Graphical Abstract


Introduction

In December 2019, cases of serious illness causing pneumonia and death were first reported in Wuhan, the capital of Hubei, China. Soon after, the number of cases soared dramatically, spreading across China and worldwide. As of March 25, more than 400,000 cases of the disease have been confirmed with over 18,000 deaths. The causative agent of the disease has been confirmed as a novel coronavirus (CoV). The World Health Organization (WHO) announced the official name of the disease as “coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)” and now publicly refers to the virus as “the COVID-19 virus” (formerly known as “2019-nCoV”, or "Wuhan Coronavirus"). Analysis of the viral genome has revealed that the new coronaviruse is phylogenetically close to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) [1], the causative agent of a viral outbreak in 2002. Thus, the new coronavirus has been named “SARS-CoV-2” by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) and other virologists [2].

Coronaviruses are enveloped, positive-sense single-stranded viruses ((+)ssRNA virus) belonging to the family Coronaviridae. Most coronaviruses have 8-10 open reading frames (ORFs). ORF1a and ORF1b are translated into polyprotein 1a (pp1a) and pp1ab, which are processed by viral proteases to produce 16 non-structural proteins containing RNA-dependent RNA polymerase enzyme (RdRp). The viral RNA is replicated through transcription of a minus-strand template by RdRp. During replication, coronaviruses generate 6-9 subgenomic mRNAs (sgmRNAs), which lead to translation of accessory and structural proteins from downstream ORFs [3]. Spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M), and nucleocapsid (N) proteins, necessary for completion of a viral replication cycle, are translated from sgmRNAs [4].

Many coronaviruses are known to infect humans and various animals. In general, 15-30% of common colds are caused by human coronaviruses (HCoVs) including HCoV-229E, HCoV-NL63, HCoV-OC43, and HCoV-HKU1 [5]. However, some coronaviruses from animal reservoirs can be transmitted to humans causing outbreaks in the human population. The SARS-CoV outbreak in 2002 originated from bats in China [6] and the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak in 2012 from dromedary camels, though also likely transmitted from bats, in the Middle East [7]. Although the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak has not yet been identified, it has been reported that SARS-CoV-2 might be transmitted by bats [8], snakes [9], or pangolins [10, 11]. Unlike HCoVs, these zoonotic viruses infect both humans and various animals and cause severe respiratory illnesses such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pneumonia, leading to death [12, 13]. The symptoms of COVID-19 are more severe in older age groups with comorbidities, while allergic diseases, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are also risk factors [14, 15].

Since 2000, various zoonotic coronaviruses have been circulating in the animal reservoir [11, 16]. Particularly, MERS became endemic in Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern countries [17, 18]. At this point, we cannot exclude the possibility of other coronavirus outbreaks in the future. The following is a review of the current status of epidemiology, diagnosis, therapeutics, and vaccines against COVID-19 and related coronaviruses.

Epidemiology

The number of COVID-19 cases reported to the WHO has been growing since the first report of COVID-19 in December 2019 from the WHO China Country Office [19]. The infection began to spread from the Huanan seafood wholesale market in Wuhan, China, while the exact infection route of the first case remains unclear. The number of confirmed cases in China grew until mid-February 2020. Then, the number of daily new cases in China started to decrease from late-February 2020 (Fig. 1). A sudden increase of the cases in China on February 17 is due to the change in COVID-19 diagnostic criteria. At the time of writing (March 19, 2020), COVID-19 cases continue to be reported globally from over 170 countries. As of March 15, 2020, 153,517 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases with 5,735 deaths (approximately 3.8% mortality) have been reported according to WHO [20, 21] (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1. Cumulative confirmed cases of COVID-19 in China, as of 15 March, 2020. Sudden increase of the cases in China on February 17 is due to the change in COVID-19 diagnostic criteria.

Fig. 2. Global distribution of COVID-19 confirmed cases, as of 15 March, 2020. Distribution of the confirmed cases of COVID-19 in each country is presented in the diagram.

In the early stages of the global COVID-19 spread, the cases identified outside of China were mostly travelers who were infected in China and then traveled to areas outside of China. Countries outside of China that reported travel-associated COVID-19 cases were Singapore, Japan, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Vietnam, Australia, United States of America, Germany, etc. [22]. Unfortunately, COVID-19 has begun to spread domestically in South Korea, Italy, Iran, and Japan from mid-February 2020 [23](Fig.3). Particularly, in the Republic of Korea, the spread of COVID-19 had been well managed until mid-February. The number of confirmed cases in South Korea was 31 on February 18, 2020 [24] and most of these cases were travelers from China or their close contacts. However, COVID-19 infections among a religious group in the Daegu metropolitan area and a nearby hospital triggered a sudden spread to other major domestic cities in South Korea in mid-February (Fig.4). As a result, a week later, the confirmed cases soared to 763 and 74.6% of those cases were tied to the event (as of February 24, 2020) [23]. On March 1, the total number of confirmed cases reached 3,526, among which 59.5% belonged to the religious group-related cases [25].

Fig. 3. Cumulative confirmed cases of COVID-19 outside of China, as of 15 March, 2020.

Fig. 4. Cumulative confirmed cases of COVID-19 in South Korea, as of 15 March, 2020. Blue bar represents the cumulative confirmed cases before the indicated date. Red bar represents the newly confirmed cases at the indicated date.

The mortality rate of SARS-CoV-2 (3.8%) [20] is lower than that of SARS-CoV (10%) [26] or MERS-CoV (37.1%)[27], but the number of relative infection cases is more than 10 times higher. Accumulating reports revealed that SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted from people who are asymptomatic or have mild infections [28-30]. These features may explain the sudden epidemic spreading of the virus.

Diagnosis

To detect this novel coronavirus, molecular-based approaches are the first line of methods to confirm suspected cases. Nucleic acid testing is the main technique for laboratory diagnosis. Other methods such as virus antigen or serological antibody testing are also valuable assays with a short turnaround time for the detection of novel coronavirus infection [31, 32]. As with other emerging viruses, the development of methods to detect antibodies and viral antigens are started after the identification of the viral genome.

The genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 was released immediately to public databases after the start of the outbreak in Wuhan, China on January 10, 2020 (Wuhan-Hu-1, GenBank Accession No. MN908947) [33]. The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends that all patient samples with suspected SARS-CoV-2 should be isolated from respiratory tract specimens (including nasal and pharyngeal swabs, sputum, or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid) then shipped to authoritative laboratories for nucleic acid amplification diagnostic testing. During international health emergencies, the real-time RT-PCR assay has shown to be a sensitive and specific method to detect respiratory pathogens in patients with an acute respiratory infection [34]. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory specimens was detected by real-time RT-PCR and next-generation sequencing. For the rapid development of real-time RT-PCR diagnostic tests, the genome sequence was used to design specific primers and probes to detect the SARS-CoV-2 [35]. All assays can use viral RNA extracted from SARS-CoV as positive control. The primers and probes targeting specific genes of SARS-CoV-2 were used in real-time RT-PCR assays as diagnostic tests (Fig. 5). The first open reading frames (ORF 1a and 1b), RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene (RdRp), envelope (E), and nucleocapsid (N) have become key diagnostic targets for SARS-CoV-2 identification. Some countries hosting institutions have shared their protocols and provided specific sequences of target primers on the WHO public database [36].

Fig. 5. A representative diagram showing currently available diagnostic primer sets on SARS-CoV-2 genome. Numbers represent genome positions according to SARS-CoV-2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1 (GenBank: MN908947.3). Each primer set for the diagnosis was indicated by grey arrows.

In the Republic of Korea, since the first confirmed case of SARS-CoV-2 on January 20, 2020, the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) rapidly applied WHO recommended RT-PCR assays and approved various in vitro diagnostic test kits. The diagnostic test kits have been distributed to public health departments and hospitals to prevent the COVID-19 spread in communities.

Antiviral Therapies

During the COVID-19 outbreak, some potential antiviral drugs are being urgently administered to patients with COVID-19 (Table 1). Those drugs are described in detail below.

Table 1 . List of candidate therapeutic agents for SARS-CoV-2 treatment.

Candidate therapeuticMarket nameManufacturerTarget diseaseEC50(COVID-19)Status of clinical trials
Favipiravir (T-705)AviganToyamaInfluenza61.88 μM [41]Under clinical trial for COVID-19 (ChiCTR2000029548)
Remdesivir (GS-5734)GileadEbola0.77 μM [41]Phase II clinical trial for Ebola (NCT03719586); Under phase III clinical trials for COVID-19 (NCT04252664)
Chloroquine/HydroxychloroquineAralen/PlaquenilSanofiMalaria1.13 μM [41]Under clinical trials for COVID-19 (a)
Lopinavir and RitonavirKaletraAbbottHIV−bUnder clinical trials for SARS [59] Under clinical trial for COVID-19 (ChiCTR2000029539)
Pegylated interferon with ribavirinVirazoleValeantHBV, HCV109 μM [41]Under clinical trial for COVID-19 (ChiCTR2000029387)

aChiCTR2000029939, ChiCTR2000029935, ChiCTR2000029899, ChiCTR2000029898, ChiCTR2000029868, ChiCTR2000029837, ChiCTR2000029826, ChiCTR2000029803, ChiCTR2000029762, ChiCTR2000029761, ChiCTR2000029760, ChiCTR2000029740, ChiCTR2000029609, ChiCTR2000029559, and ChiCTR2000029542

bUndetermined

Nucleoside Analogs

Nucleoside analogs have been used as antiviral agents. Nucleoside analogs generally interfere with cellular nucleotide synthesis pathways and cause termination of viral genome replication by the accumulating mutations and by blocking the entry of incoming natural nucleotides. In a broad spectrum of RNA viruses, nucleoside analogs act as inhibitors of viral RNA synthesis. Nucleoside analogs target the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase that is responsible for the replication of viral RNA [37-39].

Favipiravir (T-705) is a guanine analog approved for treatment against influenza virus infection in Japan and also can effectively inhibit replication of Ebola, yellow fever, chikungunya, norovirus, and enterovirus [40]. A recent study suggested that favipiravir is a potential candidate for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection showing effective antiviral activities in Vero E6 cells (EC50 = 61.88 μM) [41]. For the treatment of patients with COVID-19, favipiravir was used in combination therapy with other antiviral agents such as interferon-α (ChiCTR2000029600) or baloxavir marboxil (ChiCTR2000029544).

Among the approved nucleotide analogs, ribavirin is also a guanine analogue for treatment against hepatitis C virus (HCV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection and has been used to treat patients with SARS or MERS [42-44]. However, the drug showed side effects such as anemia in high dose treatment. The efficacy and safety of the drug are uncertain [43, 44]. For COVID-19 treatment, ribavirin was used in combination therapy with pegylated interferon (ChiCTR2000029387) to stimulate innate antiviral responses, which was given in much lower doses to minimize side effects. The combination therapies with interferon should be monitored carefully.

Remdesivir (GS-5734) is an adenine analog that has a similar chemical structure compared with tenofovir alafenamide, an approved HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitor [45]. Remdesivir also showed antiviral activity against MERS-CoV (IC50 = 0.074 μM) and SARS-CoV (IC50 = 0.069 μM) in human airway epithelial (HAE) cell, and, can inhibit MERS-CoV replication in mice [46]. This drug has been developed for the treatment of Ebola virus infection and the therapeutic efficacy was confirmed in a phase III clinical trial [47]. In the USA, the first SARS-CoV-2-infected patient was reported and administered remdesivir [48]. For the inhibition of SARS-CoV-2, the antiviral activity of remdesivir was tested in Vero cells (EC50 = 0.77 μM) [41]. Remdesivir has emerged as the most promising candidate for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Recently, two phase III clinical trials were initiated to test remdesivir in patients with SARS-CoV-2 (NCT04252664 and NCT04257656). The therapeutic efficacy and safety of favipiravir and remdesivir still need to be confirmed by clinical research in patients with SARS-CoV-2.

Chloroquine

An approved small-molecule agent, chloroquine is a cheap and safe drug for the treatment of malaria and sequesters protons into lysosomes to increase the intracellular pH. Chloroquine also has potential broad-spectrum antiviral activities by inhibiting endosomal acidification, which is required for virus-host cell fusion [49, 50]. Previous studies determined the antiviral activity of chloroquine against SARS, MERS, HIV, Ebola, Hendra, and Nipah viruses in vitro [51-54]. Chloroquine also showed inhibitory effects against SARS by interfering with glycosylation of the cellular receptor of SARS [52]. A recent in vitro study revealed that chloroquine is a promising candidate antiviral agent against SARS-CoV-2 infection in Vero E6 cells (EC50 =1.13 μM) [41]. To meet urgent clinical demand, chloroquine is now being evaluated in clinical trials (ChiCTR2000029609). For the treatment of COVID-19 cases in China, patients were treated with chloroquine to test the efficacy and safety of this antiviral agent candidate against SARS-CoV-2 infection. The results of trials demonstrated that chloroquine inhibits the exacerbation of COVID-19 [55]. Based on this finding, the experts from the government and organizer of clinical trials suggested that chloroquine is a promising antiviral agent against SARS-CoV-2.

Protease Inhibitors

Protease inhibitors are attractive candidates for antiviral drugs. The viral genome encodes polyproteins which are cleaved by viral proteases for viral gene expression and replication. Protease inhibitors prevent viral gene replication by binding to enzymes that are responsible for proteolytic cleavage [56, 57].

Both lopinavir and ritonavir are protease inhibitors, approved as HIV drugs, and have been reported to have antiviral activities against SARS and MERS [58, 59]. For treatment of SARS-CoV-2, clinical trials (ChiCTR2000029539) have been initiated to test the antiviral activity of HIV protease inhibitors in patients. However, the antiviral efficacy of HIV protease inhibitors in coronavirus proteases is debatable.

There is no specific antiviral agent against emerging novel coronavirus even though great efforts to develop effective antiviral drugs have been made by targeting of virus protease, polymerase, and host proteins following the MERS and SARS epidemics.

In the Republic of Korea after initial reports of an emerging novel coronavirus, experts from the government and academy initiated projects for the screening of potential antiviral drugs against SARS-CoV-2. These projects are supported by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) of Republic of Korea [60]. To identify novel treatments for patients infected with COVID-19, repurposing of FDA-approved drugs is also a realistic approach.

Current Status of COVID-19 Vaccine Development

Vaccines are the most effective strategy for preventing infectious disease since they are more cost-effective than treatment, and reduce morbidity and mortality without long-lasting effects [61, 62]. Preventive and therapeutic vaccines will be of fundamental value as the most obvious way to protect global health [62, 63].

Over the past two decades, three human coronaviruses (SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2) emerged worldwide, causing considerable threat to global health [64]. However, there is still no approved vaccines for human coronaviruses. Research groups around the world are accelerating the development of COVID-19 vaccines using various approaches. Precise recognition mechanisms between the virus surface proteins and the host receptors are important for understanding of cross-species transmission and host tropism and for the establishment of animal models for vaccine development [65]. The spike (S) protein of coronaviruses is an important target for vaccine development because it mediates the infection mechanism through receptor binding of host cells [65-67]. The S protein of human infectious coronaviruses recognizes various host receptors, including ACE2, APN, and DPP4 (Table 2). SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV use ACE2 as a receptor. The homology between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV is approximately 75% for the spike (S) protein-RBD [68]. The S1 subunit of S protein contains a receptor-binding domain (RBD) and the S2 subunit is necessary for membrane fusion between host cells and viruses [12, 69]. The following describes the current status of vaccine development against COVID-19 through various approaches.

Table 2 . Host tropisms and receptors of coronaviruses.

VirusHostCellular receptorReference
Alphacoronavirus
HCoV-229EHumanAPNa[96]
HCoV-NL63HumanACE2b[97]
FCoVFelineAPN[98]
CCoVCanineAPN[98]
TGEVPorcineAPN[99]
Betacoronavirus
SARS-CoVHumanACE2[100]
MERS-CoVHumanDPP4c[101]
HCoV-OC43Human9-O-acetylated sialic acid[102]
HCoV-HKU1Human9-O-acetylated sialic acid[103]
MHVMouseCEACAMd[104]

aAminopeptidase N

bAngiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)

cDipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4/CD26)

dCarcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAM)

Recombinant Subunit Vaccine

In general, subunit vaccines are advantageous over other types of vaccines in that they are highly safe and have fewer side effects by inducing the immune system without introducing infectious viruses [12]. Subunit-based vaccine development studies have also reported enhancement of T cell immune responses and generation of high titer neutralizing antibodies in vivo [70, 71].

Clover Biopharmaceuticals is pre-clinical testing a recombinant subunit vaccine based on the trimeric S protein (S-Trimer) of the SARS-CoV-2 [72]. The S protein contains three S1 heads and a trimeric S2 stalk [67]. Clover Biopharmaceuticals confirmed the generation of a native-like trimeric viral spike in mammalian cell culture-based expression system and the detection of antigen-specific neutralizing antibodies in the sera of fully-recovered COVID-19 patients [72]. Recently, Clover Biopharmaceuticals and GSK announced a partnership to improve immune response by introducing GSK’s adjuvant system to S-Trimer [73].

The University of Queensland is developing subunit vaccines using the “molecular clamp,” a transformative technology [74]. A molecular clamp is a polypeptide that stabilizes a surface protein and improves recognition of the correct antigen, thereby inducing stronger immune responses. This vaccine platform can be readily applicable to a wide range of enveloped viruses and their product can be rapidly manufactured [74]. The University of Queensland has applied GSK’s adjuvant system for the development of an effective vaccine and entered partnership with CEPI [73, 75].

DNA Vaccine

DNA vaccines represent an innovative approach by direct injection of plasmids encoding the antigens, accompanied with a wide range of immune responses [76]. These advantages are applied with prophylactic vaccines and therapeutic vaccines. Recently, various DNA vaccine platforms have been developed to improve the efficacy of vaccines by using electroporation to deliver plasmids and adding adjuvant to enhance the immune responses [77].

Inovio Pharmaceuticals, in collaboration with Beijing Advaccine Biotechnology, has started pre-clinical trials for DNA vaccine (INO-4800) against COVID-19 [78]. INO-4800 induces activation of T cells by delivering DNA plasmids that express the SARS-CoV-2 spike [79]. This vaccine platform has advantages that can produce therapeutic antibodies and activate immune cells by delivering the vaccines intradermally into the patient. Inovio Pharmaceuticals is preparing for phase I trials in the U.S.A. and China with support from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) [80].

mRNA Vaccine

mRNA vaccines are rapidly developing technologies to treat infectious diseases and cancers. mRNA-based vaccines contain mRNAs encoding the antigens, which are translated at the host cellular machinery by vaccination [61, 81]. mRNA vaccines have advantages over conventional vaccines, by the absence of genome integration, the improved immune responses, the rapid development, and the production of multimeric antigens [81].

Moderna, Inc. has started phase I clinical trials for mRNA-1273, an mRNA vaccine, encoding viral spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2. It was designed in collaboration with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [82]. In contrast to conventional vaccines which are produced in a cell culture system, Moderna’s mRNA vaccine is designed in silico, which enables the rapid development and evaluation of vaccine efficacy [83]. Moderna Inc. is preparing a phase I study with financial support from CEPI [75].

Other Vaccine Approaches

Genexine Inc. is developing a COVID-19 vaccine using Hyleukin-7 platform technology [84]. Hyleukin-7 platform enhances the immune responses by fusion of interlekin-7 (IL-7) to hyFc, designed to hybridize IgD and IgG4 for long-acting effects of Fc fusion proteins [84, 85]. IgD has a flexible hinge structure that maximizes biological activity of Fc-fusion protein. IgG4 has an unexposed junction site that minimizes adverse immunogenicity by preventing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) [86, 87]. Genexine Inc. has reported the improved vaccine efficacy showing the accumulation of pulmonary T cells and the increase of plasmacytoid dendritic cells by treatment of Fc-fused IL-7 in influenza A virus infection model [88].

Together with the vaccine technologies described above, some known hurdles also must be overcome for successful vaccine development. Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of disease is a phenomenon in which virus-specific antibodies facilitate virus entry into the host cell via the Fc-receptor pathway, leading to enhanced virus infection [89]. In other words, the antibodies generated by vaccination can promote viral infectivity. ADE effects have been reported in some vaccines against Dengue and Zika viruses [90]. Although the occurrence of ADE of SARS-CoV-2 has not yet been clearly demonstrated, potential ADE of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV was observed in an in vitro model system [91, 92]. Various approaches have been introduced in vaccine development to avoid adverse effects by ADE. For example, nucleocapsid (N) protein maybe an alternative target to overcome ADE. Since N protein is not a virus surface protein, antibodies induced by N protein-based vaccine will not be able to facilitate virus entry. DNA vaccine candidates targeting SARS-CoV N protein as an immunogen can generate N-specific humoral and cellular immune response [93]. Another major hurdle for vaccine development is higher mutation rates of RNA viruses compared to DNA viruses, resulting in higher genetic diversity [94]. Moreover, the RBD of the S protein is the most variable region in the coronavirus genome [95]. Therefore, the ADE and the higher genetic diversity should be considered as important factors for vaccine design and antibody-based drug development against SARS-CoV-2.

Summary

Despite tremendous global efforts to contain SARS-CoV-2, the virus’s spread has reached a pandemic level. Although the development of therapeutics and vaccines for the treatment of COVID-19 is still in its early stage, there has been some significant progress in the research area from complete genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 to the beginning of clinical trials with COVID-19 vaccines. Continued international efforts are required to solve the remaining unanswered questions about the novel coronavirus, including the animal sources of infection, transmissibility, and virulence of the virus.

Rapid complete genome analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and international sharing of the information have so far allowed us to produce faster and more accurate diagnostic tools. Currently, most of the developed diagnostic tools are qRT-PCR-based diagnostic tools, which require longer sample preparation and analysis time, delaying necessary actions for COVID-19 patients in the field. As COVID-19 spreads continuously all over the world, the development of rapid diagnostic methods, which can be tested in the field, is urgently required.

It has been reported that some drugs are known to be effective for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. However, the lack of clinical evidence may lead to unpredictable clinical prognosis. At the moment, quick screening of therapeutic agents for the repurposing of FDA-approved and well-characterized drugs may be a more practical approach in epidemics. Considering the seriousness of the recent outbreaks of zoonotic coronaviruses, therapeutic agents for pan-coronaviruses should be developed to cope with future outbreaks.

Together with the development of diagnostics and therapeutics, various pharmaceutical companies and institutions have announced the beginning of vaccine development as well. However, enormous funds and long-term studies are required for clinical research for the development of vaccines against infectious diseases. Despite the serious public health threat caused by viral outbreaks, the commercial markets for vaccines, particularly against emerging infectious diseases, are quite limited due to the high cost and time required for vaccine development and the uncertainty of profitability. This development environment of vaccines has created a huge gap between academic research and commercial markets. Thus, well-organized, long-term research programs should be established with internationally supported projects for the development of vaccines against emerging infectious diseases. For this reason, CEPI (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations) was launched at Davos in 2017 to link academics and pharmaceutical companies and to provide financial support for the development of vaccines against emerging infectious disease [75]. Currently, a global vaccine research development pipeline for infectious diseases has been established and its clinical trials have been funded by CEPI. In addition to these global movements, the South Korean government and the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) have announced urgent research projects for the development of vaccines and drugs against COVID-19.

Outbreaks caused by zoonotic coronaviruses can result not only in severe human casualties but also in global economies disrupting manufacturing supply chains and decreasing market demand. Therefore, cooperation of various institutions, academics, governments, and pharma-ceutical companies is inevitably necessary to prevent further spreading of the current COVID-19 and the future outbreaks.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST) grant through the Korean government (MSIP) (No. CRC-16-01-KRICT).

Conflict of Interest


The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, et al. 2020. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 395: 565-574.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  2. Gorbalenya AE, Baker SC, Baric RS, de Groot RJ, Drosten C, Gulyaeva AA, et al. 2020. Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: the species and its viruses -a statement of the coronavirus study group. BioRxiv. 20200207: 937862.
    CrossRef
  3. Sola I, Almazan F, Zuniga S, Enjuanes L. 2015. Continuous and discontinuous RNA synthesis in coronaviruses. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2: 265-288.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  4. Fehr AR, Perlman S. 2015. Coronaviruses: an overview of their replication and pathogenesis. Methods Mol. Biol. 1282: 1-23.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  5. Fung TS, Liu DX. 2019. Human coronavirus: host-pathogen interaction. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 73: 529-557.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Li W, Shi Z, Yu M, Ren W, Smith C, Epstein JH, et al. 2005. Bats are natural reservoirs of SARS-like coronaviruses. Science 310: 676-679.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Corman VM, Ithete NL, Richards LR, Schoeman MC, Preiser W, Drosten C, et al. 2014. Rooting the phylogenetic tree of middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus by characterization of a conspecific virus from an African bat.J. Virol. 88: 11297-11303.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  8. Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, et al. 2020. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 259: 270-273.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  9. Ji W, Wang W, Zhao X, Zai J, Li X. 2020. Cross-species transmission of the newly identified coronavirus 2019-nCoV. J. Med. Virol. 92: 433-440.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  10. Did pangolins spread the China coronavirus to people? Available from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00364-2#ref-CR1. Accessed 28 Feb 2020.
  11. Liu P, Chen W, Chen JP. 2019. Viral Metagenomics Revealed Sendai Virus and Coronavirus Infection of Malayan Pangolins (Manis javanica). Viruses 11. pii: E979.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  12. Graham RL, Donaldson EF, Baric RS. 2013. A decade after SARS: strategies for controlling emerging coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11: 836-848.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  13. Peiris JS, Lai ST, Poon LL, Guan Y, Yam LY, Lim W, et al. 2003. Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 361: 1319-1325.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  14. Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, Shu H, Xia Ja, Liu H, et al. 2020. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir. Med. pii: S2213-2600(20)30079-5.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  15. Zhang JJ, Dong X, Cao YY, Yuan YD, Yang YB, Yan YQ, et al. 2020. Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China. Allergy. doi: 10.1111/all.14238. [Epub ahead of print].
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Wong ACP, Li X, Lau SKP, Woo PCY. 2019. Global epidemiology of bat coronaviruses. Viruse 11.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  17. Willman M, Kobasa D, Kindrachuk J. 2019. A comparative analysis of factors influencing two outbreaks of Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome (MERS) in Saudi Arabia and South Korea. Viruses 11. pii: E1119.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  18. Reusken CB, Schilp C, Raj VS, De Bruin E, Kohl RH, Farag EA, et al. 2016. MERS-CoV infection of alpaca in a region where MERS-CoV is endemic. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 22: 1129-1131.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  19. WHO Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) SITUATION REPORT - 1 21 JANUARY 2020. Available from https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200121-sitrep-1-2019-ncov.pdf?sfvrsn=20a99c10_4. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  20. WHO Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Available from https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-china-joint-mission-on-covid-19-final-report.pdf. Accessed 02 Mar. 2020.
  21. WHO Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report - 55 (15 Mar 2020). Available from https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200315-sitrep-55-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=33daa5cb_8. Accessed 19 Mar. 2020.
  22. WHO Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report - 26 (15 Feb 2020). Available from https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200215-sitrep-26-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=a4cc6787_2. Accessed 02 Mar 2020.
  23. KCDC COVID-19 situation reports in South Korea (24 Feb 2020). Available from https://www.cdc.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a20501000000&bid=0015&act=view&list_no= 366324&tag=&nPage=1. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  24. KCDC COVID-19 situation reports in South Korea (18 Feb 2020). Available from https://www.cdc.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a20501000000&bid=0015&act=view&list_no= 366228&tag=&nPage=3. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  25. KCDC COVID-19 situation reports in South Korea (01 Mar 2020). Available from https://www.cdc.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a20501000000&bid=0015&act=view&list_no= 366410&tag=&nPage=1. Accessed 02 Mar. 2020.
  26. WHO Summary of probable SARS cases with onset of illness from 1 November 2002 to 31 July 2003. Available from https://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/table2004_04_21/en/. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  27. WHO Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) monthly summary, November 2019. Available from https://www.who.int/emergencies/mers-cov/en/. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  28. Pan X, Chen D, Xia Y, Wu X, Li T, Ou X, et al. 2020. Asymptomatic cases in a family cluster with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Lancet Infect. Dis.. pii: S1473-3099.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  29. Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, Tian F, Jin DY, Chen L, et al. 2020. Presumed Asymptomatic Carrier Transmission of COVID-19. JAMA. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2565. [Epub ahead of print].
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  30. Rothe C, Schunk M, Sothmann P, Bretzel G, Froeschl G, Wallrauch C, et al. 2020. Transmis sion of 2019-nCoV infection from an asymptomatic contact in Germany. N. Engl. J. Med. 382: 970-971.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  31. Chen Y, Chan KH, Kang Y, Chen H, Luk HK, Poon RW, et al. 2015. A sensitive and specific antigen detection assay for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 4: e26.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  32. Meyer B, Drosten C, Muller MA. 2014. Serological assays for emerging coronaviruses: challenges and pitfalls. Virus Res. 194: 175-183.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  33. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. 2020. A Novel Coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 382: 727-733.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  34. Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. 2020. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet 395: 470-473.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  35. Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A, Chu DKW, et al. 2020. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 25(3). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  36. WHO Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) technical guidance: Laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humans. Available from https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/laboratory-guidance. Accessed 02 Mar. 2020.
  37. Wang Y, Wang W, Xu L, Zhou X, Shokrollahi E, Felczak K, et al. 2016. Cross talk between nucleotide synthesis pathways with cellular immunity in constraining hepatitis E virus replication. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 60: 2834-2848.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  38. Debing Y, Emerson SU, Wang Y, Pan Q, Balzarini J, Dallmeier K, et al. 2014. Ribavirin inhibits in vitro hepatitis E virus replication through depletion of cellular GTP pools and is moderately synergistic with alpha interferon. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58: 267-273.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  39. Leyssen P, Balzarini J, De Clercq E, Neyts J. 2005. The predominant mechanism by which ribavirin exerts its antiviral activity in vitro against flaviviruses and paramy-xoviruses is mediated by inhibition of IMP dehydrogenase. J. Virol. 79: 1943-1947.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  40. De Clercq E. 2019. New nucleoside analogues for the treatment of hemorrhagic fever virus infections. Chem. Asian J. 14: 3962-3968.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  41. Wang M, Cao R, Zhang L, Yang X, Liu J, Xu M, et al. 2020. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res. 30: 269-271.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  42. So LK, Lau AC, Yam LY, Cheung TM, Poon E, Yung RW, et al. 2003. Development of a standard treatment protocol for severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 361: 1615-1617.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  43. Al-Tawfiq JA, Momattin H, Dib J, Memish ZA. 2014. Ribavirin and interferon therapy in patients infected with the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: an observational study. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 20: 42-46.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  44. Zumla A, Chan JF, Azhar EI, Hui DS, Yuen KY. 2016. Coronaviruses - drug discovery and therapeutic options. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 15: 327-347.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  45. Choy M. 2016. Pharmaceutical approval update. P T. 41: 416-441.
    Pubmed PMC
  46. Sheahan TP, Sims AC, Graham RL, Menachery VD, Gralinski LE, Case JB, et al. 2017. Broad-spectrum antiviral GS-5734 inhibits both epidemic and zoonotic coronaviruses. Sci. Transl. Med. 9.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  47. Mulangu S, Dodd LE, Davey RT Jr, Tshiani Mbaya O, Proschan M, Mukadi D, et al. 2019. A Randomized, controlled trial of ebola virus disease therapeutics. N. Engl. J. Med. 381: 2293-2303.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  48. Holshue ML, DeBolt C, Lindquist S, Lofy KH, Wiesman J, Bruce H, et al. 2020. First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 382: 929-936.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  49. Yan Y, Zou Z, Sun Y, Li X, Xu KF, Wei Y, et al. 2013. Anti-malaria drug chloroquine is highly effective in treating avian influenza A H5N1 virus infection in an animal model. Cell Res. 23: 300-302.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  50. Savarino A, Di Trani L, Donatelli I, Cauda R, Cassone A. 2006. New insights into the antiviral effects of chloroquine. Lancet Infect. Dis. 6: 67-69.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  51. Kono M, Tatsumi K, Imai AM, Saito K, Kuriyama T, Shirasawa H. 2008. Inhibition of human coronavirus 229E infection in human epithelial lung cells (L132) by chloroquine: involvement of p38 MAPK and ERK. Antiviral Res. 77: 150-152.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  52. Vincent MJ, Bergeron E, Benjannet S, Erickson BR, Rollin PE, Ksiazek TG, et al. 2005. Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread. Virol. J. 2: 69.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  53. Keyaerts E, Vijgen L, Maes P, Neyts J, Van Ranst M. 2004. In vitro inhibition of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus by chloroquine. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 323: 264-268.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  54. Savarino A, Boelaert JR, Cassone A, Majori G, Cauda R. 2003. Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: an old drug against today's diseases? Lancet Infect. Dis. 3: 722-727.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  55. Gao J, Tian Z, Yang X. 2020. Breakthrough: Chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 associated pneumonia in clinical studies. Biosci. Trends 14: 72-73.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  56. Wu CY, Jan JT, Ma SH, Kuo CJ, Juan HF, Cheng YS, et al. 2004. Small molecules targeting severe acute respiratory syndrome human coronavirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 10012-10017.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  57. Mukherjee P, Desai P, Ross L, White EL, Avery MA. 2008. Structure-based virtual screening against SARS-3CL(pro) to identify novel non-peptidic hits. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 16: 4138-4149.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  58. Chu CM, Cheng VC, Hung IF, Wong MM, Chan KH, Chan KS, et al. 2004. Role of lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of SARS: initial virological and clinical findings. Thorax. 59: 252-256.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  59. Chan KS, Lai ST, Chu CM, Tsui E, Tam CY, Wong MM, et al. 2003. Treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome with lopinavir/ritonavir: a multicentre retrospective matched cohort study. Hong Kong Med. J. 9: 399-406.
    Pubmed
  60. MSIT Research projects initiation for drug repositioning study for COVID-19 treatment. Available from https://www.msit.go.kr/web/msipContents/contentsView.do?cateId=_policycom2&artId=2657968. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  61. Zhang C, Maruggi G, Shan H, Li J. 2019. Advances in mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases. Front Immunol. 10: 594.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  62. Andre FE. 2001. The future of vaccines, immunisation concepts and practice. Vaccine 19: 2206-2209.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  63. Pronker ES, Weenen TC, Commandeur H, Claassen EH, Osterhaus AD. 2013. Risk in vaccine research and development quantified. PLoS One 8: e57755.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  64. Guarner J. 2020. Three emerging coronaviruses in two decades. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 153: 420-421.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  65. Du L, He Y, Zhou Y, Liu S, Zheng BJ, Jiang S. 2009. The spike protein of SARS-CoV--a target for vaccine and therapeutic development. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7: 226-236.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  66. Coutard B, Valle C, de Lamballerie X, Canard B, Seidah NG, Decroly E. 2020. The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade. Antiviral Res. 176: 104742.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  67. Li F. 2016. Structure, function, and evolution of coronavirus spike proteins. Annu. Rev. Virol. 3: 237-261.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  68. Sun C, Chen L, Yang J, Luo C, Zhang Y, Li J, et al. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV Spike-RBD structure and receptor binding comparison and potential implications on neutralizing antibody and vaccine development. BioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.02.16.951723.
    CrossRef
  69. He Y, Zhou Y, Liu S, Kou Z, Li W, Farzan M, et al. 2004. Receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV spike protein induces highly potent neutralizing antibodies: implication for developing subunit vaccine. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 324: 773-781.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  70. Okba NM, Raj VS, Haagmans BL. 2017. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus vaccines: current status and novel approaches. Curr. Opin. Virol. 23: 49-58.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  71. Bisht H, Roberts A, Vogel L, Subbarao K, Moss B. 2005. Neutralizing antibody and protective immunity to SARS coronavirus infection of mice induced by a soluble recombinant polypeptide containing an N-terminal segment of the spike glycoprotein. Virology 334: 160-165.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  72. Clover Biopharmaceuticals vaccines programs. Available from http://www.cloverbiopharma.com/index.php?m= content&c=index&a=lists&catid=42. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  73. CEPI and GSK announce collaboration to strengthen the global effort to develop a vaccine for the 2019-nCoV virus. Available from https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/media/press-releases/cepi-and-gsk-announce-collaboration-to-strengthen-the-global-effort-to-develop-a-vaccine-for-the-2019-ncov-virus/. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  74. Significant step' in COVID-19 vaccine quest. Available from https://www.uq.edu.au/news/article/2020/02/significant-step%E2%80%99-covid-19-vaccine-quest. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  75. CEPI to fund three progrannes to develop vaccines against the novel coronavirus (nCoV-2019). Available from https://cepi.net/news_cepi/cepi-to-fund-three-programmes-to-develop-vaccines-against-the-novel-coronavirus-ncov-2019. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  76. Yang ZY, Kong WP, Huang Y, Roberts A, Murphy BR, Subbarao K, et al. 2004. A DNA vaccine induces SARS coronavirus neutralization and protective immunity in mice. Nature 428: 561-564.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  77. Sardesai NY, Weiner DB. 2011. Electroporation delivery of DNA vaccines: prospects for success. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 23: 421-429.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  78. Inovio Accelerates Timeline for COVID-19 DNA Vaccine INO-4800. Available from http://ir.inovio.com/news-and-media/news/press-release-details/2020/Inovio-Accelerates-Timeline-for-COVID-19-DNA-Vaccine-INO-4800/default.aspx. Accessed 03 Mar. 2020.
  79. Inovio's produc pipeline. Available from https://www.inovio.com/product-pipeline. Accessed 20 Feb. 2020.
  80. dMAb Technology platform. Available from https://www.inovio.com/technology#dmab. Accessed 20 Feb. 2020.
  81. Pardi N, Hogan MJ, Porter FW, Weissman D. 2018. mRNA vaccines - a new era in vaccinology. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 17: 261-279.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  82. Moderna's pipeline. Available from https://www.modernatx.com/pipeline. Accessed 20 Feb. 2020.
  83. mRNA platform: Enabling Drug Discovery & Development. Available from https://www.modernatx.com/mrna-technology/mrna-platform-enabling-drug-discovery-development. Accessed 20 Feb. 2020.
  84. hyFc platform. Available from http://www.genexine.com/m21.php. Accessed 20 Feb. 2020.
  85. Seo YB, Im SJ, Namkoong H, Kim SW, Choi YW, Kang MC, et al. 2014. Crucial roles of interleukin-7 in the development of T follicular helper cells and in the induction of humoral immunity. J. Virol. 88: 8998-9009.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  86. Lee JH, Cho JH, Yeo J, Lee SH, Yang SH, Sung YC, et al. 2013. The pharmacology study of a new recombinant TNF receptor-hyFc fusion protein. Biologicals 41: 77-83.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  87. Loset GA, Roux KH, Zhu P, Michaelsen TE, Sandlie I. 2004. Differential segmental flexibility and reach dictate the antigen binding mode of chimeric IgD and IgM: implications for the function of the B cell receptor. J. Immunol. 172: 2925-2934.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  88. Kang MC, Park HW, Choi DH, Choi YW, Park Y, Sung YC, et al. 2017. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells contribute to the protective immunity induced by intranasal treatment with Fc-fused interleukin-7 against lethal influenza virus infection. Immune Netw. 17: 343-351.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  89. Tirado SM, Yoon KJ. 2003. Antibody-dependent enhancement of virus infection and disease. Viral Immunol. 16: 69-86.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  90. Khandia R, Munjal A, Dhama K, Karthik K, Tiwari R, Malik YS, et al. 2018. Modulation of Dengue/Zika Virus pathogenicity by antibody-dependent enhancement and strategies to protect against enhancement in Zika Virus infection. Front Immunol. 9: 597.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  91. Wan Y, Shang J, Sun S, Tai W, Chen J, Geng Q, et al. 2020. Molecular mechanism for antibody-dependent enhancement of coronavirus entry. J. Virol. 94(5). pii: e02015-19.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  92. Wang SF, Tseng SP, Yen CH, Yang JY, Tsao CH, Shen CW, et al. 2014. Antibody-dependent SARS coronavirus infection is mediated by antibodies against spike proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 451: 208-214.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  93. Kim TW, Lee JH, Hung CF, Peng S, Roden R, Wang MC, et al. 2004. Generation and characterization of DNA vaccines targeting the nucleocapsid protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J. Virol. 78: 4638-4645.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  94. Duffy S. 2018. Why are RNA virus mutation rates so damn high? PLoS Biol. 16: e3000003.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  95. Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, et al. 2020. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579: 270-273.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  96. Yeager CL, Ashmun RA, Williams RK, Cardellichio CB, Shapiro LH, Look AT, et al. 1992. Human aminopeptidase N is a receptor for human coronavirus 229E. Nature 357: 420-422.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  97. Hofmann H, Pyrc K, van der Hoek L, Geier M, Berkhout B, Pohlmann S. 2005. Human coronavirus NL63 employs the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus receptor for cellular entry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 7988-7993.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  98. Tresnan DB, Levis R, Holmes KV. 1996. Feline aminopeptidase N serves as a receptor for feline, canine, porcine, and human coronaviruses in serogroup I. J. Virol. 70: 8669-8674.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  99. Delmas B, Gelfi J, L'Haridon R, Vogel LK, Sjostrom H, Noren O, et al. 1992. Aminopeptidase N is a major receptor for the entero-pathogenic coronavirus TGEV. Nature. 357: 417-420.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  100. Li W, Moore MJ, Vasilieva N, Sui J, Wong SK, Berne MA, et al. 2003. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature 426: 450-454.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  101. Raj VS, Mou H, Smits SL, Dekkers DH, Muller MA, Dijkman R, et al. 2013. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC. Nature 495: 251-254.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  102. Krempl C, Schultze B, Herrler G. 1995. Analysis of cellular receptors for human coronavirus OC43. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 380: 371-374.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  103. Huang X, Dong W, Milewska A, Golda A, Qi Y, Zhu QK, et al. 2015. Human coronavirus HKU1 spike protein uses O-acetylated sialic acid as an attachment receptor determinant and employs hemagglutinin-esterase protein as a receptor-destroying enzyme. J. Virol. 89: 7202-7213.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  104. Williams RK, Jiang GS, Holmes KV. 1991. Receptor for mouse hepatitis virus is a member of the carcinoembryonic antigen family of glycoproteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 5533-5536.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef

Related articles in JMB

More Related Articles

Article

Review

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020; 30(3): 313-324

Published online March 28, 2020 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2003.03011

Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Current Status of Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Therapeutics, and Vaccines for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Dae-Gyun Ahn 1, Hye-Jin Shin 1, Mi-Hwa Kim 1, 2, Sunhee Lee 1, Hae-Soo Kim 1, Jinjong Myoung 3, Bum-Tae Kim 1* and Seong-Jun Kim 1*

1Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, 2Bioenvironmental Science & Toxicology Division, Gyeongnam Branch Institute, Korea Institute of Toxicology, 3Korea Zoonosis Research Institute & Genetic Engineering Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University

Received: March 6, 2020; Accepted: March 22, 2020

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causing serious respiratory illness such as pneumonia and lung failure was firstly reported in Wuhan city, the capital of Hubei, China. The etiological agent of COVID-19 has been confirmed as a novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which is most likely transmitted from zoonotic coronaviruses, similar to SARS-CoV previously emerged in 2002. Within a few months of the first report, SARS-CoV-2 has spread across China and worldwide, reaching a pandemic level. As COVID-19 has triggered enormous human casualties and serious economic loss posing global threats, it is urgent to understand the ongoing situation and to build strategies to contain the viral spread. Currently, various diagnostic kits for testing COVID-19 are available and several repurposing therapeutics for COVID-19 have shown to be clinically effective. In addition, global institutions and companies have begun to develop vaccines for the prevention of COVID-19. Here, we review current status of epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and vaccine development for the COVID-19.

Keywords: 2019-nCoV, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Coronavirus, outbreak

Introduction

In December 2019, cases of serious illness causing pneumonia and death were first reported in Wuhan, the capital of Hubei, China. Soon after, the number of cases soared dramatically, spreading across China and worldwide. As of March 25, more than 400,000 cases of the disease have been confirmed with over 18,000 deaths. The causative agent of the disease has been confirmed as a novel coronavirus (CoV). The World Health Organization (WHO) announced the official name of the disease as “coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)” and now publicly refers to the virus as “the COVID-19 virus” (formerly known as “2019-nCoV”, or "Wuhan Coronavirus"). Analysis of the viral genome has revealed that the new coronaviruse is phylogenetically close to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) [1], the causative agent of a viral outbreak in 2002. Thus, the new coronavirus has been named “SARS-CoV-2” by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) and other virologists [2].

Coronaviruses are enveloped, positive-sense single-stranded viruses ((+)ssRNA virus) belonging to the family Coronaviridae. Most coronaviruses have 8-10 open reading frames (ORFs). ORF1a and ORF1b are translated into polyprotein 1a (pp1a) and pp1ab, which are processed by viral proteases to produce 16 non-structural proteins containing RNA-dependent RNA polymerase enzyme (RdRp). The viral RNA is replicated through transcription of a minus-strand template by RdRp. During replication, coronaviruses generate 6-9 subgenomic mRNAs (sgmRNAs), which lead to translation of accessory and structural proteins from downstream ORFs [3]. Spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M), and nucleocapsid (N) proteins, necessary for completion of a viral replication cycle, are translated from sgmRNAs [4].

Many coronaviruses are known to infect humans and various animals. In general, 15-30% of common colds are caused by human coronaviruses (HCoVs) including HCoV-229E, HCoV-NL63, HCoV-OC43, and HCoV-HKU1 [5]. However, some coronaviruses from animal reservoirs can be transmitted to humans causing outbreaks in the human population. The SARS-CoV outbreak in 2002 originated from bats in China [6] and the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak in 2012 from dromedary camels, though also likely transmitted from bats, in the Middle East [7]. Although the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak has not yet been identified, it has been reported that SARS-CoV-2 might be transmitted by bats [8], snakes [9], or pangolins [10, 11]. Unlike HCoVs, these zoonotic viruses infect both humans and various animals and cause severe respiratory illnesses such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pneumonia, leading to death [12, 13]. The symptoms of COVID-19 are more severe in older age groups with comorbidities, while allergic diseases, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are also risk factors [14, 15].

Since 2000, various zoonotic coronaviruses have been circulating in the animal reservoir [11, 16]. Particularly, MERS became endemic in Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern countries [17, 18]. At this point, we cannot exclude the possibility of other coronavirus outbreaks in the future. The following is a review of the current status of epidemiology, diagnosis, therapeutics, and vaccines against COVID-19 and related coronaviruses.

Epidemiology

The number of COVID-19 cases reported to the WHO has been growing since the first report of COVID-19 in December 2019 from the WHO China Country Office [19]. The infection began to spread from the Huanan seafood wholesale market in Wuhan, China, while the exact infection route of the first case remains unclear. The number of confirmed cases in China grew until mid-February 2020. Then, the number of daily new cases in China started to decrease from late-February 2020 (Fig. 1). A sudden increase of the cases in China on February 17 is due to the change in COVID-19 diagnostic criteria. At the time of writing (March 19, 2020), COVID-19 cases continue to be reported globally from over 170 countries. As of March 15, 2020, 153,517 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases with 5,735 deaths (approximately 3.8% mortality) have been reported according to WHO [20, 21] (Fig. 2).

Figure 1. Cumulative confirmed cases of COVID-19 in China, as of 15 March, 2020. Sudden increase of the cases in China on February 17 is due to the change in COVID-19 diagnostic criteria.

Figure 2. Global distribution of COVID-19 confirmed cases, as of 15 March, 2020. Distribution of the confirmed cases of COVID-19 in each country is presented in the diagram.

In the early stages of the global COVID-19 spread, the cases identified outside of China were mostly travelers who were infected in China and then traveled to areas outside of China. Countries outside of China that reported travel-associated COVID-19 cases were Singapore, Japan, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Vietnam, Australia, United States of America, Germany, etc. [22]. Unfortunately, COVID-19 has begun to spread domestically in South Korea, Italy, Iran, and Japan from mid-February 2020 [23](Fig.3). Particularly, in the Republic of Korea, the spread of COVID-19 had been well managed until mid-February. The number of confirmed cases in South Korea was 31 on February 18, 2020 [24] and most of these cases were travelers from China or their close contacts. However, COVID-19 infections among a religious group in the Daegu metropolitan area and a nearby hospital triggered a sudden spread to other major domestic cities in South Korea in mid-February (Fig.4). As a result, a week later, the confirmed cases soared to 763 and 74.6% of those cases were tied to the event (as of February 24, 2020) [23]. On March 1, the total number of confirmed cases reached 3,526, among which 59.5% belonged to the religious group-related cases [25].

Figure 3. Cumulative confirmed cases of COVID-19 outside of China, as of 15 March, 2020.

Figure 4. Cumulative confirmed cases of COVID-19 in South Korea, as of 15 March, 2020. Blue bar represents the cumulative confirmed cases before the indicated date. Red bar represents the newly confirmed cases at the indicated date.

The mortality rate of SARS-CoV-2 (3.8%) [20] is lower than that of SARS-CoV (10%) [26] or MERS-CoV (37.1%)[27], but the number of relative infection cases is more than 10 times higher. Accumulating reports revealed that SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted from people who are asymptomatic or have mild infections [28-30]. These features may explain the sudden epidemic spreading of the virus.

Diagnosis

To detect this novel coronavirus, molecular-based approaches are the first line of methods to confirm suspected cases. Nucleic acid testing is the main technique for laboratory diagnosis. Other methods such as virus antigen or serological antibody testing are also valuable assays with a short turnaround time for the detection of novel coronavirus infection [31, 32]. As with other emerging viruses, the development of methods to detect antibodies and viral antigens are started after the identification of the viral genome.

The genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 was released immediately to public databases after the start of the outbreak in Wuhan, China on January 10, 2020 (Wuhan-Hu-1, GenBank Accession No. MN908947) [33]. The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends that all patient samples with suspected SARS-CoV-2 should be isolated from respiratory tract specimens (including nasal and pharyngeal swabs, sputum, or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid) then shipped to authoritative laboratories for nucleic acid amplification diagnostic testing. During international health emergencies, the real-time RT-PCR assay has shown to be a sensitive and specific method to detect respiratory pathogens in patients with an acute respiratory infection [34]. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory specimens was detected by real-time RT-PCR and next-generation sequencing. For the rapid development of real-time RT-PCR diagnostic tests, the genome sequence was used to design specific primers and probes to detect the SARS-CoV-2 [35]. All assays can use viral RNA extracted from SARS-CoV as positive control. The primers and probes targeting specific genes of SARS-CoV-2 were used in real-time RT-PCR assays as diagnostic tests (Fig. 5). The first open reading frames (ORF 1a and 1b), RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene (RdRp), envelope (E), and nucleocapsid (N) have become key diagnostic targets for SARS-CoV-2 identification. Some countries hosting institutions have shared their protocols and provided specific sequences of target primers on the WHO public database [36].

Figure 5. A representative diagram showing currently available diagnostic primer sets on SARS-CoV-2 genome. Numbers represent genome positions according to SARS-CoV-2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1 (GenBank: MN908947.3). Each primer set for the diagnosis was indicated by grey arrows.

In the Republic of Korea, since the first confirmed case of SARS-CoV-2 on January 20, 2020, the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) rapidly applied WHO recommended RT-PCR assays and approved various in vitro diagnostic test kits. The diagnostic test kits have been distributed to public health departments and hospitals to prevent the COVID-19 spread in communities.

Antiviral Therapies

During the COVID-19 outbreak, some potential antiviral drugs are being urgently administered to patients with COVID-19 (Table 1). Those drugs are described in detail below.

Table 1 . List of candidate therapeutic agents for SARS-CoV-2 treatment..

Candidate therapeuticMarket nameManufacturerTarget diseaseEC50(COVID-19)Status of clinical trials
Favipiravir (T-705)AviganToyamaInfluenza61.88 μM [41]Under clinical trial for COVID-19 (ChiCTR2000029548)
Remdesivir (GS-5734)GileadEbola0.77 μM [41]Phase II clinical trial for Ebola (NCT03719586); Under phase III clinical trials for COVID-19 (NCT04252664)
Chloroquine/HydroxychloroquineAralen/PlaquenilSanofiMalaria1.13 μM [41]Under clinical trials for COVID-19 (a)
Lopinavir and RitonavirKaletraAbbottHIV−bUnder clinical trials for SARS [59] Under clinical trial for COVID-19 (ChiCTR2000029539)
Pegylated interferon with ribavirinVirazoleValeantHBV, HCV109 μM [41]Under clinical trial for COVID-19 (ChiCTR2000029387)

aChiCTR2000029939, ChiCTR2000029935, ChiCTR2000029899, ChiCTR2000029898, ChiCTR2000029868, ChiCTR2000029837, ChiCTR2000029826, ChiCTR2000029803, ChiCTR2000029762, ChiCTR2000029761, ChiCTR2000029760, ChiCTR2000029740, ChiCTR2000029609, ChiCTR2000029559, and ChiCTR2000029542.

bUndetermined.

Nucleoside Analogs

Nucleoside analogs have been used as antiviral agents. Nucleoside analogs generally interfere with cellular nucleotide synthesis pathways and cause termination of viral genome replication by the accumulating mutations and by blocking the entry of incoming natural nucleotides. In a broad spectrum of RNA viruses, nucleoside analogs act as inhibitors of viral RNA synthesis. Nucleoside analogs target the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase that is responsible for the replication of viral RNA [37-39].

Favipiravir (T-705) is a guanine analog approved for treatment against influenza virus infection in Japan and also can effectively inhibit replication of Ebola, yellow fever, chikungunya, norovirus, and enterovirus [40]. A recent study suggested that favipiravir is a potential candidate for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection showing effective antiviral activities in Vero E6 cells (EC50 = 61.88 μM) [41]. For the treatment of patients with COVID-19, favipiravir was used in combination therapy with other antiviral agents such as interferon-α (ChiCTR2000029600) or baloxavir marboxil (ChiCTR2000029544).

Among the approved nucleotide analogs, ribavirin is also a guanine analogue for treatment against hepatitis C virus (HCV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection and has been used to treat patients with SARS or MERS [42-44]. However, the drug showed side effects such as anemia in high dose treatment. The efficacy and safety of the drug are uncertain [43, 44]. For COVID-19 treatment, ribavirin was used in combination therapy with pegylated interferon (ChiCTR2000029387) to stimulate innate antiviral responses, which was given in much lower doses to minimize side effects. The combination therapies with interferon should be monitored carefully.

Remdesivir (GS-5734) is an adenine analog that has a similar chemical structure compared with tenofovir alafenamide, an approved HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitor [45]. Remdesivir also showed antiviral activity against MERS-CoV (IC50 = 0.074 μM) and SARS-CoV (IC50 = 0.069 μM) in human airway epithelial (HAE) cell, and, can inhibit MERS-CoV replication in mice [46]. This drug has been developed for the treatment of Ebola virus infection and the therapeutic efficacy was confirmed in a phase III clinical trial [47]. In the USA, the first SARS-CoV-2-infected patient was reported and administered remdesivir [48]. For the inhibition of SARS-CoV-2, the antiviral activity of remdesivir was tested in Vero cells (EC50 = 0.77 μM) [41]. Remdesivir has emerged as the most promising candidate for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Recently, two phase III clinical trials were initiated to test remdesivir in patients with SARS-CoV-2 (NCT04252664 and NCT04257656). The therapeutic efficacy and safety of favipiravir and remdesivir still need to be confirmed by clinical research in patients with SARS-CoV-2.

Chloroquine

An approved small-molecule agent, chloroquine is a cheap and safe drug for the treatment of malaria and sequesters protons into lysosomes to increase the intracellular pH. Chloroquine also has potential broad-spectrum antiviral activities by inhibiting endosomal acidification, which is required for virus-host cell fusion [49, 50]. Previous studies determined the antiviral activity of chloroquine against SARS, MERS, HIV, Ebola, Hendra, and Nipah viruses in vitro [51-54]. Chloroquine also showed inhibitory effects against SARS by interfering with glycosylation of the cellular receptor of SARS [52]. A recent in vitro study revealed that chloroquine is a promising candidate antiviral agent against SARS-CoV-2 infection in Vero E6 cells (EC50 =1.13 μM) [41]. To meet urgent clinical demand, chloroquine is now being evaluated in clinical trials (ChiCTR2000029609). For the treatment of COVID-19 cases in China, patients were treated with chloroquine to test the efficacy and safety of this antiviral agent candidate against SARS-CoV-2 infection. The results of trials demonstrated that chloroquine inhibits the exacerbation of COVID-19 [55]. Based on this finding, the experts from the government and organizer of clinical trials suggested that chloroquine is a promising antiviral agent against SARS-CoV-2.

Protease Inhibitors

Protease inhibitors are attractive candidates for antiviral drugs. The viral genome encodes polyproteins which are cleaved by viral proteases for viral gene expression and replication. Protease inhibitors prevent viral gene replication by binding to enzymes that are responsible for proteolytic cleavage [56, 57].

Both lopinavir and ritonavir are protease inhibitors, approved as HIV drugs, and have been reported to have antiviral activities against SARS and MERS [58, 59]. For treatment of SARS-CoV-2, clinical trials (ChiCTR2000029539) have been initiated to test the antiviral activity of HIV protease inhibitors in patients. However, the antiviral efficacy of HIV protease inhibitors in coronavirus proteases is debatable.

There is no specific antiviral agent against emerging novel coronavirus even though great efforts to develop effective antiviral drugs have been made by targeting of virus protease, polymerase, and host proteins following the MERS and SARS epidemics.

In the Republic of Korea after initial reports of an emerging novel coronavirus, experts from the government and academy initiated projects for the screening of potential antiviral drugs against SARS-CoV-2. These projects are supported by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) of Republic of Korea [60]. To identify novel treatments for patients infected with COVID-19, repurposing of FDA-approved drugs is also a realistic approach.

Current Status of COVID-19 Vaccine Development

Vaccines are the most effective strategy for preventing infectious disease since they are more cost-effective than treatment, and reduce morbidity and mortality without long-lasting effects [61, 62]. Preventive and therapeutic vaccines will be of fundamental value as the most obvious way to protect global health [62, 63].

Over the past two decades, three human coronaviruses (SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2) emerged worldwide, causing considerable threat to global health [64]. However, there is still no approved vaccines for human coronaviruses. Research groups around the world are accelerating the development of COVID-19 vaccines using various approaches. Precise recognition mechanisms between the virus surface proteins and the host receptors are important for understanding of cross-species transmission and host tropism and for the establishment of animal models for vaccine development [65]. The spike (S) protein of coronaviruses is an important target for vaccine development because it mediates the infection mechanism through receptor binding of host cells [65-67]. The S protein of human infectious coronaviruses recognizes various host receptors, including ACE2, APN, and DPP4 (Table 2). SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV use ACE2 as a receptor. The homology between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV is approximately 75% for the spike (S) protein-RBD [68]. The S1 subunit of S protein contains a receptor-binding domain (RBD) and the S2 subunit is necessary for membrane fusion between host cells and viruses [12, 69]. The following describes the current status of vaccine development against COVID-19 through various approaches.

Table 2 . Host tropisms and receptors of coronaviruses..

VirusHostCellular receptorReference
Alphacoronavirus
HCoV-229EHumanAPNa[96]
HCoV-NL63HumanACE2b[97]
FCoVFelineAPN[98]
CCoVCanineAPN[98]
TGEVPorcineAPN[99]
Betacoronavirus
SARS-CoVHumanACE2[100]
MERS-CoVHumanDPP4c[101]
HCoV-OC43Human9-O-acetylated sialic acid[102]
HCoV-HKU1Human9-O-acetylated sialic acid[103]
MHVMouseCEACAMd[104]

aAminopeptidase N.

bAngiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2).

cDipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4/CD26).

dCarcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAM).

Recombinant Subunit Vaccine

In general, subunit vaccines are advantageous over other types of vaccines in that they are highly safe and have fewer side effects by inducing the immune system without introducing infectious viruses [12]. Subunit-based vaccine development studies have also reported enhancement of T cell immune responses and generation of high titer neutralizing antibodies in vivo [70, 71].

Clover Biopharmaceuticals is pre-clinical testing a recombinant subunit vaccine based on the trimeric S protein (S-Trimer) of the SARS-CoV-2 [72]. The S protein contains three S1 heads and a trimeric S2 stalk [67]. Clover Biopharmaceuticals confirmed the generation of a native-like trimeric viral spike in mammalian cell culture-based expression system and the detection of antigen-specific neutralizing antibodies in the sera of fully-recovered COVID-19 patients [72]. Recently, Clover Biopharmaceuticals and GSK announced a partnership to improve immune response by introducing GSK’s adjuvant system to S-Trimer [73].

The University of Queensland is developing subunit vaccines using the “molecular clamp,” a transformative technology [74]. A molecular clamp is a polypeptide that stabilizes a surface protein and improves recognition of the correct antigen, thereby inducing stronger immune responses. This vaccine platform can be readily applicable to a wide range of enveloped viruses and their product can be rapidly manufactured [74]. The University of Queensland has applied GSK’s adjuvant system for the development of an effective vaccine and entered partnership with CEPI [73, 75].

DNA Vaccine

DNA vaccines represent an innovative approach by direct injection of plasmids encoding the antigens, accompanied with a wide range of immune responses [76]. These advantages are applied with prophylactic vaccines and therapeutic vaccines. Recently, various DNA vaccine platforms have been developed to improve the efficacy of vaccines by using electroporation to deliver plasmids and adding adjuvant to enhance the immune responses [77].

Inovio Pharmaceuticals, in collaboration with Beijing Advaccine Biotechnology, has started pre-clinical trials for DNA vaccine (INO-4800) against COVID-19 [78]. INO-4800 induces activation of T cells by delivering DNA plasmids that express the SARS-CoV-2 spike [79]. This vaccine platform has advantages that can produce therapeutic antibodies and activate immune cells by delivering the vaccines intradermally into the patient. Inovio Pharmaceuticals is preparing for phase I trials in the U.S.A. and China with support from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) [80].

mRNA Vaccine

mRNA vaccines are rapidly developing technologies to treat infectious diseases and cancers. mRNA-based vaccines contain mRNAs encoding the antigens, which are translated at the host cellular machinery by vaccination [61, 81]. mRNA vaccines have advantages over conventional vaccines, by the absence of genome integration, the improved immune responses, the rapid development, and the production of multimeric antigens [81].

Moderna, Inc. has started phase I clinical trials for mRNA-1273, an mRNA vaccine, encoding viral spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2. It was designed in collaboration with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [82]. In contrast to conventional vaccines which are produced in a cell culture system, Moderna’s mRNA vaccine is designed in silico, which enables the rapid development and evaluation of vaccine efficacy [83]. Moderna Inc. is preparing a phase I study with financial support from CEPI [75].

Other Vaccine Approaches

Genexine Inc. is developing a COVID-19 vaccine using Hyleukin-7 platform technology [84]. Hyleukin-7 platform enhances the immune responses by fusion of interlekin-7 (IL-7) to hyFc, designed to hybridize IgD and IgG4 for long-acting effects of Fc fusion proteins [84, 85]. IgD has a flexible hinge structure that maximizes biological activity of Fc-fusion protein. IgG4 has an unexposed junction site that minimizes adverse immunogenicity by preventing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) [86, 87]. Genexine Inc. has reported the improved vaccine efficacy showing the accumulation of pulmonary T cells and the increase of plasmacytoid dendritic cells by treatment of Fc-fused IL-7 in influenza A virus infection model [88].

Together with the vaccine technologies described above, some known hurdles also must be overcome for successful vaccine development. Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of disease is a phenomenon in which virus-specific antibodies facilitate virus entry into the host cell via the Fc-receptor pathway, leading to enhanced virus infection [89]. In other words, the antibodies generated by vaccination can promote viral infectivity. ADE effects have been reported in some vaccines against Dengue and Zika viruses [90]. Although the occurrence of ADE of SARS-CoV-2 has not yet been clearly demonstrated, potential ADE of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV was observed in an in vitro model system [91, 92]. Various approaches have been introduced in vaccine development to avoid adverse effects by ADE. For example, nucleocapsid (N) protein maybe an alternative target to overcome ADE. Since N protein is not a virus surface protein, antibodies induced by N protein-based vaccine will not be able to facilitate virus entry. DNA vaccine candidates targeting SARS-CoV N protein as an immunogen can generate N-specific humoral and cellular immune response [93]. Another major hurdle for vaccine development is higher mutation rates of RNA viruses compared to DNA viruses, resulting in higher genetic diversity [94]. Moreover, the RBD of the S protein is the most variable region in the coronavirus genome [95]. Therefore, the ADE and the higher genetic diversity should be considered as important factors for vaccine design and antibody-based drug development against SARS-CoV-2.

Summary

Despite tremendous global efforts to contain SARS-CoV-2, the virus’s spread has reached a pandemic level. Although the development of therapeutics and vaccines for the treatment of COVID-19 is still in its early stage, there has been some significant progress in the research area from complete genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 to the beginning of clinical trials with COVID-19 vaccines. Continued international efforts are required to solve the remaining unanswered questions about the novel coronavirus, including the animal sources of infection, transmissibility, and virulence of the virus.

Rapid complete genome analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and international sharing of the information have so far allowed us to produce faster and more accurate diagnostic tools. Currently, most of the developed diagnostic tools are qRT-PCR-based diagnostic tools, which require longer sample preparation and analysis time, delaying necessary actions for COVID-19 patients in the field. As COVID-19 spreads continuously all over the world, the development of rapid diagnostic methods, which can be tested in the field, is urgently required.

It has been reported that some drugs are known to be effective for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. However, the lack of clinical evidence may lead to unpredictable clinical prognosis. At the moment, quick screening of therapeutic agents for the repurposing of FDA-approved and well-characterized drugs may be a more practical approach in epidemics. Considering the seriousness of the recent outbreaks of zoonotic coronaviruses, therapeutic agents for pan-coronaviruses should be developed to cope with future outbreaks.

Together with the development of diagnostics and therapeutics, various pharmaceutical companies and institutions have announced the beginning of vaccine development as well. However, enormous funds and long-term studies are required for clinical research for the development of vaccines against infectious diseases. Despite the serious public health threat caused by viral outbreaks, the commercial markets for vaccines, particularly against emerging infectious diseases, are quite limited due to the high cost and time required for vaccine development and the uncertainty of profitability. This development environment of vaccines has created a huge gap between academic research and commercial markets. Thus, well-organized, long-term research programs should be established with internationally supported projects for the development of vaccines against emerging infectious diseases. For this reason, CEPI (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations) was launched at Davos in 2017 to link academics and pharmaceutical companies and to provide financial support for the development of vaccines against emerging infectious disease [75]. Currently, a global vaccine research development pipeline for infectious diseases has been established and its clinical trials have been funded by CEPI. In addition to these global movements, the South Korean government and the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) have announced urgent research projects for the development of vaccines and drugs against COVID-19.

Outbreaks caused by zoonotic coronaviruses can result not only in severe human casualties but also in global economies disrupting manufacturing supply chains and decreasing market demand. Therefore, cooperation of various institutions, academics, governments, and pharma-ceutical companies is inevitably necessary to prevent further spreading of the current COVID-19 and the future outbreaks.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST) grant through the Korean government (MSIP) (No. CRC-16-01-KRICT).

Conflict of Interest


The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

Fig 1.

Download
Figure 1.Cumulative confirmed cases of COVID-19 in China, as of 15 March, 2020. Sudden increase of the cases in China on February 17 is due to the change in COVID-19 diagnostic criteria.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2020; 30: 313-324https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2003.03011

Fig 2.

Download
Figure 2.Global distribution of COVID-19 confirmed cases, as of 15 March, 2020. Distribution of the confirmed cases of COVID-19 in each country is presented in the diagram.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2020; 30: 313-324https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2003.03011

Fig 3.

Download
Figure 3.Cumulative confirmed cases of COVID-19 outside of China, as of 15 March, 2020.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2020; 30: 313-324https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2003.03011

Fig 4.

Download
Figure 4.Cumulative confirmed cases of COVID-19 in South Korea, as of 15 March, 2020. Blue bar represents the cumulative confirmed cases before the indicated date. Red bar represents the newly confirmed cases at the indicated date.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2020; 30: 313-324https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2003.03011

Fig 5.

Download
Figure 5.A representative diagram showing currently available diagnostic primer sets on SARS-CoV-2 genome. Numbers represent genome positions according to SARS-CoV-2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1 (GenBank: MN908947.3). Each primer set for the diagnosis was indicated by grey arrows.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2020; 30: 313-324https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2003.03011

Table 1 . List of candidate therapeutic agents for SARS-CoV-2 treatment..

Candidate therapeuticMarket nameManufacturerTarget diseaseEC50(COVID-19)Status of clinical trials
Favipiravir (T-705)AviganToyamaInfluenza61.88 μM [41]Under clinical trial for COVID-19 (ChiCTR2000029548)
Remdesivir (GS-5734)GileadEbola0.77 μM [41]Phase II clinical trial for Ebola (NCT03719586); Under phase III clinical trials for COVID-19 (NCT04252664)
Chloroquine/HydroxychloroquineAralen/PlaquenilSanofiMalaria1.13 μM [41]Under clinical trials for COVID-19 (a)
Lopinavir and RitonavirKaletraAbbottHIV−bUnder clinical trials for SARS [59] Under clinical trial for COVID-19 (ChiCTR2000029539)
Pegylated interferon with ribavirinVirazoleValeantHBV, HCV109 μM [41]Under clinical trial for COVID-19 (ChiCTR2000029387)

aChiCTR2000029939, ChiCTR2000029935, ChiCTR2000029899, ChiCTR2000029898, ChiCTR2000029868, ChiCTR2000029837, ChiCTR2000029826, ChiCTR2000029803, ChiCTR2000029762, ChiCTR2000029761, ChiCTR2000029760, ChiCTR2000029740, ChiCTR2000029609, ChiCTR2000029559, and ChiCTR2000029542.

bUndetermined.

Table 2 . Host tropisms and receptors of coronaviruses..

VirusHostCellular receptorReference
Alphacoronavirus
HCoV-229EHumanAPNa[96]
HCoV-NL63HumanACE2b[97]
FCoVFelineAPN[98]
CCoVCanineAPN[98]
TGEVPorcineAPN[99]
Betacoronavirus
SARS-CoVHumanACE2[100]
MERS-CoVHumanDPP4c[101]
HCoV-OC43Human9-O-acetylated sialic acid[102]
HCoV-HKU1Human9-O-acetylated sialic acid[103]
MHVMouseCEACAMd[104]

aAminopeptidase N.

bAngiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2).

cDipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4/CD26).

dCarcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAM).

References

  1. Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, et al. 2020. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 395: 565-574.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  2. Gorbalenya AE, Baker SC, Baric RS, de Groot RJ, Drosten C, Gulyaeva AA, et al. 2020. Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: the species and its viruses -a statement of the coronavirus study group. BioRxiv. 20200207: 937862.
    CrossRef
  3. Sola I, Almazan F, Zuniga S, Enjuanes L. 2015. Continuous and discontinuous RNA synthesis in coronaviruses. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2: 265-288.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Fehr AR, Perlman S. 2015. Coronaviruses: an overview of their replication and pathogenesis. Methods Mol. Biol. 1282: 1-23.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Fung TS, Liu DX. 2019. Human coronavirus: host-pathogen interaction. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 73: 529-557.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Li W, Shi Z, Yu M, Ren W, Smith C, Epstein JH, et al. 2005. Bats are natural reservoirs of SARS-like coronaviruses. Science 310: 676-679.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Corman VM, Ithete NL, Richards LR, Schoeman MC, Preiser W, Drosten C, et al. 2014. Rooting the phylogenetic tree of middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus by characterization of a conspecific virus from an African bat.J. Virol. 88: 11297-11303.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, et al. 2020. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 259: 270-273.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Ji W, Wang W, Zhao X, Zai J, Li X. 2020. Cross-species transmission of the newly identified coronavirus 2019-nCoV. J. Med. Virol. 92: 433-440.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Did pangolins spread the China coronavirus to people? Available from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00364-2#ref-CR1. Accessed 28 Feb 2020.
  11. Liu P, Chen W, Chen JP. 2019. Viral Metagenomics Revealed Sendai Virus and Coronavirus Infection of Malayan Pangolins (Manis javanica). Viruses 11. pii: E979.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  12. Graham RL, Donaldson EF, Baric RS. 2013. A decade after SARS: strategies for controlling emerging coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11: 836-848.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Peiris JS, Lai ST, Poon LL, Guan Y, Yam LY, Lim W, et al. 2003. Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 361: 1319-1325.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, Shu H, Xia Ja, Liu H, et al. 2020. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir. Med. pii: S2213-2600(20)30079-5.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Zhang JJ, Dong X, Cao YY, Yuan YD, Yang YB, Yan YQ, et al. 2020. Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China. Allergy. doi: 10.1111/all.14238. [Epub ahead of print].
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Wong ACP, Li X, Lau SKP, Woo PCY. 2019. Global epidemiology of bat coronaviruses. Viruse 11.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. Willman M, Kobasa D, Kindrachuk J. 2019. A comparative analysis of factors influencing two outbreaks of Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome (MERS) in Saudi Arabia and South Korea. Viruses 11. pii: E1119.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Reusken CB, Schilp C, Raj VS, De Bruin E, Kohl RH, Farag EA, et al. 2016. MERS-CoV infection of alpaca in a region where MERS-CoV is endemic. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 22: 1129-1131.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. WHO Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) SITUATION REPORT - 1 21 JANUARY 2020. Available from https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200121-sitrep-1-2019-ncov.pdf?sfvrsn=20a99c10_4. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  20. WHO Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Available from https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-china-joint-mission-on-covid-19-final-report.pdf. Accessed 02 Mar. 2020.
  21. WHO Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report - 55 (15 Mar 2020). Available from https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200315-sitrep-55-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=33daa5cb_8. Accessed 19 Mar. 2020.
  22. WHO Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report - 26 (15 Feb 2020). Available from https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200215-sitrep-26-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=a4cc6787_2. Accessed 02 Mar 2020.
  23. KCDC COVID-19 situation reports in South Korea (24 Feb 2020). Available from https://www.cdc.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a20501000000&bid=0015&act=view&list_no= 366324&tag=&nPage=1. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  24. KCDC COVID-19 situation reports in South Korea (18 Feb 2020). Available from https://www.cdc.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a20501000000&bid=0015&act=view&list_no= 366228&tag=&nPage=3. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  25. KCDC COVID-19 situation reports in South Korea (01 Mar 2020). Available from https://www.cdc.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a20501000000&bid=0015&act=view&list_no= 366410&tag=&nPage=1. Accessed 02 Mar. 2020.
  26. WHO Summary of probable SARS cases with onset of illness from 1 November 2002 to 31 July 2003. Available from https://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/table2004_04_21/en/. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  27. WHO Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) monthly summary, November 2019. Available from https://www.who.int/emergencies/mers-cov/en/. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  28. Pan X, Chen D, Xia Y, Wu X, Li T, Ou X, et al. 2020. Asymptomatic cases in a family cluster with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Lancet Infect. Dis.. pii: S1473-3099.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  29. Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, Tian F, Jin DY, Chen L, et al. 2020. Presumed Asymptomatic Carrier Transmission of COVID-19. JAMA. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2565. [Epub ahead of print].
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Rothe C, Schunk M, Sothmann P, Bretzel G, Froeschl G, Wallrauch C, et al. 2020. Transmis sion of 2019-nCoV infection from an asymptomatic contact in Germany. N. Engl. J. Med. 382: 970-971.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Chen Y, Chan KH, Kang Y, Chen H, Luk HK, Poon RW, et al. 2015. A sensitive and specific antigen detection assay for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 4: e26.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Meyer B, Drosten C, Muller MA. 2014. Serological assays for emerging coronaviruses: challenges and pitfalls. Virus Res. 194: 175-183.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. 2020. A Novel Coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 382: 727-733.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. 2020. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet 395: 470-473.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  35. Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A, Chu DKW, et al. 2020. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 25(3). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  36. WHO Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) technical guidance: Laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humans. Available from https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/laboratory-guidance. Accessed 02 Mar. 2020.
  37. Wang Y, Wang W, Xu L, Zhou X, Shokrollahi E, Felczak K, et al. 2016. Cross talk between nucleotide synthesis pathways with cellular immunity in constraining hepatitis E virus replication. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 60: 2834-2848.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  38. Debing Y, Emerson SU, Wang Y, Pan Q, Balzarini J, Dallmeier K, et al. 2014. Ribavirin inhibits in vitro hepatitis E virus replication through depletion of cellular GTP pools and is moderately synergistic with alpha interferon. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58: 267-273.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  39. Leyssen P, Balzarini J, De Clercq E, Neyts J. 2005. The predominant mechanism by which ribavirin exerts its antiviral activity in vitro against flaviviruses and paramy-xoviruses is mediated by inhibition of IMP dehydrogenase. J. Virol. 79: 1943-1947.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  40. De Clercq E. 2019. New nucleoside analogues for the treatment of hemorrhagic fever virus infections. Chem. Asian J. 14: 3962-3968.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  41. Wang M, Cao R, Zhang L, Yang X, Liu J, Xu M, et al. 2020. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res. 30: 269-271.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  42. So LK, Lau AC, Yam LY, Cheung TM, Poon E, Yung RW, et al. 2003. Development of a standard treatment protocol for severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 361: 1615-1617.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  43. Al-Tawfiq JA, Momattin H, Dib J, Memish ZA. 2014. Ribavirin and interferon therapy in patients infected with the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: an observational study. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 20: 42-46.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  44. Zumla A, Chan JF, Azhar EI, Hui DS, Yuen KY. 2016. Coronaviruses - drug discovery and therapeutic options. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 15: 327-347.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  45. Choy M. 2016. Pharmaceutical approval update. P T. 41: 416-441.
    Pubmed KoreaMed
  46. Sheahan TP, Sims AC, Graham RL, Menachery VD, Gralinski LE, Case JB, et al. 2017. Broad-spectrum antiviral GS-5734 inhibits both epidemic and zoonotic coronaviruses. Sci. Transl. Med. 9.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  47. Mulangu S, Dodd LE, Davey RT Jr, Tshiani Mbaya O, Proschan M, Mukadi D, et al. 2019. A Randomized, controlled trial of ebola virus disease therapeutics. N. Engl. J. Med. 381: 2293-2303.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  48. Holshue ML, DeBolt C, Lindquist S, Lofy KH, Wiesman J, Bruce H, et al. 2020. First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 382: 929-936.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  49. Yan Y, Zou Z, Sun Y, Li X, Xu KF, Wei Y, et al. 2013. Anti-malaria drug chloroquine is highly effective in treating avian influenza A H5N1 virus infection in an animal model. Cell Res. 23: 300-302.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  50. Savarino A, Di Trani L, Donatelli I, Cauda R, Cassone A. 2006. New insights into the antiviral effects of chloroquine. Lancet Infect. Dis. 6: 67-69.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  51. Kono M, Tatsumi K, Imai AM, Saito K, Kuriyama T, Shirasawa H. 2008. Inhibition of human coronavirus 229E infection in human epithelial lung cells (L132) by chloroquine: involvement of p38 MAPK and ERK. Antiviral Res. 77: 150-152.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  52. Vincent MJ, Bergeron E, Benjannet S, Erickson BR, Rollin PE, Ksiazek TG, et al. 2005. Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread. Virol. J. 2: 69.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  53. Keyaerts E, Vijgen L, Maes P, Neyts J, Van Ranst M. 2004. In vitro inhibition of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus by chloroquine. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 323: 264-268.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  54. Savarino A, Boelaert JR, Cassone A, Majori G, Cauda R. 2003. Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: an old drug against today's diseases? Lancet Infect. Dis. 3: 722-727.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  55. Gao J, Tian Z, Yang X. 2020. Breakthrough: Chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 associated pneumonia in clinical studies. Biosci. Trends 14: 72-73.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  56. Wu CY, Jan JT, Ma SH, Kuo CJ, Juan HF, Cheng YS, et al. 2004. Small molecules targeting severe acute respiratory syndrome human coronavirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 10012-10017.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  57. Mukherjee P, Desai P, Ross L, White EL, Avery MA. 2008. Structure-based virtual screening against SARS-3CL(pro) to identify novel non-peptidic hits. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 16: 4138-4149.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  58. Chu CM, Cheng VC, Hung IF, Wong MM, Chan KH, Chan KS, et al. 2004. Role of lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of SARS: initial virological and clinical findings. Thorax. 59: 252-256.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  59. Chan KS, Lai ST, Chu CM, Tsui E, Tam CY, Wong MM, et al. 2003. Treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome with lopinavir/ritonavir: a multicentre retrospective matched cohort study. Hong Kong Med. J. 9: 399-406.
    Pubmed
  60. MSIT Research projects initiation for drug repositioning study for COVID-19 treatment. Available from https://www.msit.go.kr/web/msipContents/contentsView.do?cateId=_policycom2&artId=2657968. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  61. Zhang C, Maruggi G, Shan H, Li J. 2019. Advances in mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases. Front Immunol. 10: 594.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  62. Andre FE. 2001. The future of vaccines, immunisation concepts and practice. Vaccine 19: 2206-2209.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  63. Pronker ES, Weenen TC, Commandeur H, Claassen EH, Osterhaus AD. 2013. Risk in vaccine research and development quantified. PLoS One 8: e57755.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  64. Guarner J. 2020. Three emerging coronaviruses in two decades. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 153: 420-421.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  65. Du L, He Y, Zhou Y, Liu S, Zheng BJ, Jiang S. 2009. The spike protein of SARS-CoV--a target for vaccine and therapeutic development. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7: 226-236.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  66. Coutard B, Valle C, de Lamballerie X, Canard B, Seidah NG, Decroly E. 2020. The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade. Antiviral Res. 176: 104742.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  67. Li F. 2016. Structure, function, and evolution of coronavirus spike proteins. Annu. Rev. Virol. 3: 237-261.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  68. Sun C, Chen L, Yang J, Luo C, Zhang Y, Li J, et al. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV Spike-RBD structure and receptor binding comparison and potential implications on neutralizing antibody and vaccine development. BioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.02.16.951723.
    CrossRef
  69. He Y, Zhou Y, Liu S, Kou Z, Li W, Farzan M, et al. 2004. Receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV spike protein induces highly potent neutralizing antibodies: implication for developing subunit vaccine. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 324: 773-781.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  70. Okba NM, Raj VS, Haagmans BL. 2017. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus vaccines: current status and novel approaches. Curr. Opin. Virol. 23: 49-58.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  71. Bisht H, Roberts A, Vogel L, Subbarao K, Moss B. 2005. Neutralizing antibody and protective immunity to SARS coronavirus infection of mice induced by a soluble recombinant polypeptide containing an N-terminal segment of the spike glycoprotein. Virology 334: 160-165.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  72. Clover Biopharmaceuticals vaccines programs. Available from http://www.cloverbiopharma.com/index.php?m= content&c=index&a=lists&catid=42. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  73. CEPI and GSK announce collaboration to strengthen the global effort to develop a vaccine for the 2019-nCoV virus. Available from https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/media/press-releases/cepi-and-gsk-announce-collaboration-to-strengthen-the-global-effort-to-develop-a-vaccine-for-the-2019-ncov-virus/. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  74. Significant step' in COVID-19 vaccine quest. Available from https://www.uq.edu.au/news/article/2020/02/significant-step%E2%80%99-covid-19-vaccine-quest. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  75. CEPI to fund three progrannes to develop vaccines against the novel coronavirus (nCoV-2019). Available from https://cepi.net/news_cepi/cepi-to-fund-three-programmes-to-develop-vaccines-against-the-novel-coronavirus-ncov-2019. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
  76. Yang ZY, Kong WP, Huang Y, Roberts A, Murphy BR, Subbarao K, et al. 2004. A DNA vaccine induces SARS coronavirus neutralization and protective immunity in mice. Nature 428: 561-564.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  77. Sardesai NY, Weiner DB. 2011. Electroporation delivery of DNA vaccines: prospects for success. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 23: 421-429.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  78. Inovio Accelerates Timeline for COVID-19 DNA Vaccine INO-4800. Available from http://ir.inovio.com/news-and-media/news/press-release-details/2020/Inovio-Accelerates-Timeline-for-COVID-19-DNA-Vaccine-INO-4800/default.aspx. Accessed 03 Mar. 2020.
  79. Inovio's produc pipeline. Available from https://www.inovio.com/product-pipeline. Accessed 20 Feb. 2020.
  80. dMAb Technology platform. Available from https://www.inovio.com/technology#dmab. Accessed 20 Feb. 2020.
  81. Pardi N, Hogan MJ, Porter FW, Weissman D. 2018. mRNA vaccines - a new era in vaccinology. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 17: 261-279.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  82. Moderna's pipeline. Available from https://www.modernatx.com/pipeline. Accessed 20 Feb. 2020.
  83. mRNA platform: Enabling Drug Discovery & Development. Available from https://www.modernatx.com/mrna-technology/mrna-platform-enabling-drug-discovery-development. Accessed 20 Feb. 2020.
  84. hyFc platform. Available from http://www.genexine.com/m21.php. Accessed 20 Feb. 2020.
  85. Seo YB, Im SJ, Namkoong H, Kim SW, Choi YW, Kang MC, et al. 2014. Crucial roles of interleukin-7 in the development of T follicular helper cells and in the induction of humoral immunity. J. Virol. 88: 8998-9009.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  86. Lee JH, Cho JH, Yeo J, Lee SH, Yang SH, Sung YC, et al. 2013. The pharmacology study of a new recombinant TNF receptor-hyFc fusion protein. Biologicals 41: 77-83.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  87. Loset GA, Roux KH, Zhu P, Michaelsen TE, Sandlie I. 2004. Differential segmental flexibility and reach dictate the antigen binding mode of chimeric IgD and IgM: implications for the function of the B cell receptor. J. Immunol. 172: 2925-2934.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  88. Kang MC, Park HW, Choi DH, Choi YW, Park Y, Sung YC, et al. 2017. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells contribute to the protective immunity induced by intranasal treatment with Fc-fused interleukin-7 against lethal influenza virus infection. Immune Netw. 17: 343-351.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  89. Tirado SM, Yoon KJ. 2003. Antibody-dependent enhancement of virus infection and disease. Viral Immunol. 16: 69-86.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  90. Khandia R, Munjal A, Dhama K, Karthik K, Tiwari R, Malik YS, et al. 2018. Modulation of Dengue/Zika Virus pathogenicity by antibody-dependent enhancement and strategies to protect against enhancement in Zika Virus infection. Front Immunol. 9: 597.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  91. Wan Y, Shang J, Sun S, Tai W, Chen J, Geng Q, et al. 2020. Molecular mechanism for antibody-dependent enhancement of coronavirus entry. J. Virol. 94(5). pii: e02015-19.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  92. Wang SF, Tseng SP, Yen CH, Yang JY, Tsao CH, Shen CW, et al. 2014. Antibody-dependent SARS coronavirus infection is mediated by antibodies against spike proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 451: 208-214.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  93. Kim TW, Lee JH, Hung CF, Peng S, Roden R, Wang MC, et al. 2004. Generation and characterization of DNA vaccines targeting the nucleocapsid protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J. Virol. 78: 4638-4645.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  94. Duffy S. 2018. Why are RNA virus mutation rates so damn high? PLoS Biol. 16: e3000003.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  95. Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, et al. 2020. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579: 270-273.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  96. Yeager CL, Ashmun RA, Williams RK, Cardellichio CB, Shapiro LH, Look AT, et al. 1992. Human aminopeptidase N is a receptor for human coronavirus 229E. Nature 357: 420-422.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  97. Hofmann H, Pyrc K, van der Hoek L, Geier M, Berkhout B, Pohlmann S. 2005. Human coronavirus NL63 employs the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus receptor for cellular entry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 7988-7993.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  98. Tresnan DB, Levis R, Holmes KV. 1996. Feline aminopeptidase N serves as a receptor for feline, canine, porcine, and human coronaviruses in serogroup I. J. Virol. 70: 8669-8674.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  99. Delmas B, Gelfi J, L'Haridon R, Vogel LK, Sjostrom H, Noren O, et al. 1992. Aminopeptidase N is a major receptor for the entero-pathogenic coronavirus TGEV. Nature. 357: 417-420.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  100. Li W, Moore MJ, Vasilieva N, Sui J, Wong SK, Berne MA, et al. 2003. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature 426: 450-454.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  101. Raj VS, Mou H, Smits SL, Dekkers DH, Muller MA, Dijkman R, et al. 2013. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC. Nature 495: 251-254.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  102. Krempl C, Schultze B, Herrler G. 1995. Analysis of cellular receptors for human coronavirus OC43. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 380: 371-374.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  103. Huang X, Dong W, Milewska A, Golda A, Qi Y, Zhu QK, et al. 2015. Human coronavirus HKU1 spike protein uses O-acetylated sialic acid as an attachment receptor determinant and employs hemagglutinin-esterase protein as a receptor-destroying enzyme. J. Virol. 89: 7202-7213.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  104. Williams RK, Jiang GS, Holmes KV. 1991. Receptor for mouse hepatitis virus is a member of the carcinoembryonic antigen family of glycoproteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 5533-5536.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef