전체메뉴
검색
Article Search

JMB Journal of Microbiolog and Biotechnology

QR Code QR Code

Research article

References

  1. Chi WJ, Chang YK, Hong SK. 2012. Agar degradation by microorganisms and agar-degrading enzymes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 94: 917-930.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Fu XT, Kim SM. 2010. Agarase: review of major sources, categories, purification method, enzyme characteristics and applications. Mar. Drugs 8: 200-218.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  3. Araki C. 1956. Structure of the agarose constituent of agaragar. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 29: 543-544.
    CrossRef
  4. Mai Z, Su H, Zhang S. 2016. Isolation and characterization of a glycosyl hydrolase family 16 beta-agarase from a mangrove soil metagenomic library. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17: E1360.
    CrossRef
  5. Kobayashi R, Takisada M, Suzuki T, Kirimura K, Usami S. 1997. Neoagarobiose as a novel moisturizer with whitening effect. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 61: 162-163.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Yun EJ, Lee S, Kim JH, Kim BB, Kim HT, Lee SH, et al. 2013. Enzymatic production of 3,6-anhydro-L-galactose from agarose and its purification and in vitro skin whitening and anti-inflammatory activities. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97: 2961-2970.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Yoshizawa Y, Ametani A, Tsunehiro J, Nomura K, Itoh M, Fukui F, et al. 1995. Macrophage stimulation activity of the polysaccharide fraction from a marine alga (Porphyra yezoensis): structure-function relationships and improved solubility. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 59: 1933-1937.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Fernandez LE, Valiente OG, Mainardi V, Bello JL, Velez H, Rosado A. 1989. Isolation and characterization of an antitumor active agar-type polysaccharide of Gracilaria dominguensis. Carbohydr. Res. 190: 77-83.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Hu B, Gong Q, Wang Y, Ma Y, Li J, Yu W. 2006. Prebiotic effects of neoagaro-oligosaccharides prepared by enzymatic hydrolysis of agarose. Anaerobe 12: 260-266.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Jang M-K, Lee OKH, Yoo KH, Lee D-G, Lee S-H. 2007. Secretory overexpression of β-agarase in Bacillus subtilis and antibacterial activity of enzymatic products. J. Life Sci. 17: 1601-1604.
    CrossRef
  11. Fu XT, Pan CH, Lin H, Kim SM. 2009. Gene cloning, expression, and characterization of a beta-agarase, agaB34, from Agarivorans albus YKW-34. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19: 257-264.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Leon O, Quintana L, Peruzzo G, Slebe JC. 1992. Purification and properties of an extracellular agarase from Alteromonas sp. strain C-1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58: 4060-4063.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  13. Ha JC, Kim GT, Kim SK, Oh TK, Yu JH, Kong IS. 1997. beta-agarase from Pseudomonas sp. W7: purification of the recombinant enzyme from Escherichia coli and the effects of salt on its activity. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 26: 1-6.purification.
    Pubmed
  14. Lee S, Park J, Yoon S, Kim J, Kong I. 2000. Sequence analysis of a beta-agarase gene (pjaA) from Pseudomonas sp. isolated from marine environment. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 89: 485-488.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Sugano Y, Matsumoto T, Kodama H, Noma M. 1993. Cloning and sequencing of agaA, a unique agarase 0107 gene from a marine bacterium, Vibrio sp. strain JT0107. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59: 3750-3756.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  16. Sugano Y, Terada I, Arita M, Noma M, Matsumoto T. 1993. Purification and characterization of a new agarase from a marine bacterium, Vibrio sp. strain JT0107. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59: 1549-1554.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  17. Oh C, Nikapitiya C, Lee Y, Whang I, Kim SJ, Kang DH, et al. 2010. Cloning, purification and biochemical characterization of beta agarase from the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. AG4. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 37: 483-494.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Suzuki H, Sawai Y, Suzuki T, Kawai K. 2003. Purification and characterization of an extracellular β-agarase from Bacillus sp. MK03. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 95: 328-334.
    CrossRef
  19. Li J, Sha Y, Seswita-Zilda D, Hu Q, He P. 2014. Purification and characterization of thermostable agarase from Bacillus sp. BI-3, a thermophilic bacterium isolated from hot spring. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24: 19-25.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Ohta Y, Hatada Y, Nogi Y, Li Z, Ito S, Horikoshi K. 2004. Cloning, expression, and characterization of a glycoside hydrolase family 86 beta-agarase from a deep-sea Microbulbifer- like isolate. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 66: 266-275.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Kim DK, Jang YR, Kim KH, Lee MN, Kim AR, Jo EJ, et al. 2011. Isolation and culture properties of a thermophilic agarase-producing strain, Microbulbifer sp. SD-1. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 14: 186-191.
    CrossRef
  22. Lee Y, Oh C, De Zoysa M, Kim H, Wickramaarachchi WD, Whang I, et al. 2013. Molecular cloning, overexpression, and enzymatic characterization of glycosyl hydrolase family 16 beta-agarase from marine bacterium Saccharophagus sp. AG21 in Escherichia coli. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 23: 913-922.
    CrossRef
  23. Lakshmikanth M, Manohar S, Lalitha J. 2009. Purification and characterization of β-agarase from agar-liquefying soil bacterium, Acinetobacter sp. , AG LSL-1. Process Biochem. 44: 999-1003.
    CrossRef
  24. Du ZJ, Zhang DC, Liu SN, Chen JX, Tian XL, Zhang ZN, et al. 2009. Gilvimarinus chinensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an agar-digesting marine bacterium within the class Gammaproteobacteria isolated from coastal seawater in Qingdao, China. Int. J. System. Evol. Microbiol. 59: 2987-2990.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Cheng H, Zhang S, Huo YY, Jiang XW, Zhang XQ, Pan J, et al. 2015. Gilvimarinus polysaccharolyticus sp. nov., an agardigesting bacterium isolated from seaweed, and emended description of the genus Gilvimarinus. Int. J. System. Evol. Microbiol. 65: 562-569.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Kim BC, Kim MN, Lee KH, Kim HS, Min SR, Shin KS. 2011. Gilvimarinus agarilyticus sp. nov., a new agar-degrading bacterium isolated from the seashore of Jeju Island. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 100: 67-73.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Lee Y, Lee SJ, Park GH, Heo SJ, Umasuthan N, Kang DH, et al. 2015. Draft genome of agar-degrading marine bacterium Gilvimarinus agarilyticus JEA5. Mar. Genomics 21: 13-14.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. 2011. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods 8: 785-786.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  30. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947-2948.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Marchler-Bauer A, Lu S, Anderson JB, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, et al. 2011. CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 39: D225-D229.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  32. Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P. 2012. SMART 7: recent updates to the protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 40: D302-D305.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  33. Finn RD, Attwood TK, Babbitt PC, Bateman A, Bork P, Bridge AJ, et al. 2017. InterPro in 2017 - beyond protein family and domain annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 45: D190-D199.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  34. Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, et al. 2014. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30: 1236-1240.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  35. Sumner JB. 1924. The estimation of sugar in diabetic urine, using dinitrosalicylic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 62: 287-290.
    CrossRef
  36. Swimmer C, Lehar SM, McCafferty J, Chiswell DJ, Blattler WA, Guild BC. 1992. Phage display of ricin B chain and its single binding domains: system for screening galactosebinding mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 3756-3760.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  37. Dodd RB, Drickamer K. 2001. Lectin-like proteins in model organisms: implications for evolution of carbohydrate-binding activity. Glycobiology 11: 71R-79R.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Cui F, Dong S, Shi X, Zhao X, Zhang XH. 2014. Overexpression and characterization of a novel thermostable beta-agarase YM01-3, from marine bacterium Catenovulum agarivorans YM01(T). Mar. Drugs 12: 2731-2747.
    CrossRef
  39. Chi WJ, Lee CR, Dugerjonjuu S, Park JS, Kang DK, Hong SK. 2015. Biochemical characterization of a novel iron-dependent GH16 beta-agarase, AgaH92, from an agarolytic bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. H9. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 362: fnv035.
    CrossRef
  40. Zhang WW, Sun L. 2007. Cloning, characterization, and molecular application of a beta-agarase gene from Vibrio sp. strain V134. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 2825-2831.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  41. Dong J, Tamaru Y, Araki T. 2007. Molecular cloning, expression, and characterization of a beta-agarase gene, agaD, from a marine bacterium, Vibrio sp. strain PO-303. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 71: 38-46.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Dong J, Hashikawa S, Konishi T, Tamaru Y, Araki T. 2006. Cloning of the novel gene encoding beta-agarase C from a marine bacterium, Vibrio sp. strain PO-303, and characterization of the gene product. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 6399-6401.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef
  43. Ma C, Lu X, Shi C, Li J, Gu Y, Ma Y, et al. 2007. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel beta-agarase, AgaB, from marine Pseudoalteromonas sp. CY24. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 3747-3754.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  44. Jang MK, Lee DG, Kim NY, Yu KH, Jang HJ, Lee SW, et al. 2009. Purification and characterization of neoagarotetraose from hydrolyzed agar. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19: 1197-1200.
    Pubmed
  45. Zhang N, Mao X, Li RW, Hou E, Wang Y, Xue C, et al. 2017. Neoagarotetraose protects mice against intense exercise-induced fatigue damage by modulating gut microbial composition and function. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 61: DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201600585.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  46. Wang W, Liu P, Hao C, Wu L, Wan W, Mao X. 2017. Neoagaro-oligosaccharide monomers inhibit inflammation in LPS-stimulated macrophages through suppression of MAPK and NF-κB pathways. Sci. Rep. 7: 44252.
    Pubmed PMC CrossRef

Related articles in JMB

More Related Articles

Article

Research article

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018; 28(5): 776-783

Published online May 28, 2018 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1709.09050

Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.

A Novel Glycosyl Hydrolase Family 16 β-Agarase from the Agar- Utilizing Marine Bacterium Gilvimarinus agarilyticus JEA5: the First Molecular and Biochemical Characterization of Agarase in Genus Gilvimarinus

Youngdeuk Lee1, Eunyoung Jo1, Yeon-Ju Lee2, Sachithra Amarin Hettiarachchi1, 3, Gun-Hoo Park1, Su-Jin Lee 1, Soo-Jin Heo1, 3, Do-Hyung Kang1, 3 and Chulhong Oh1, 3*

1Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology, Jeju Special Self-Govering Province 63349, Republic of Korea , 2Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology, Ansan 15627, Republic of Korea , 3Department of Marine Biology, Korea University of Science and Technology, Jeju Special Self-Governing Province 63349, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to:Chulhong  Oh
och0101@kiost.ac.kr

Received: September 22, 2017; Accepted: February 26, 2018

Abstract

The agarase gene gaa16a was identified from a draft genome sequence of Gilvimarinus agarilyticus JEA5, an agar-utilizing marine bacterium. Recently, three agarase-producing bacteria, G. chinensis, G. polysaccharolyticus, and G. agarilyticus, in the genus Gilvimarinus were reported. However, there have been no reports of the molecular characteristics and biochemical properties of these agarases. In this study, we analyzed the molecular characteristics and biochemical properties of agarases in Gilvimarinus. Gaa16A comprised a 1,323-bp open reading frame encoding 441 amino acids. The predicted molecular mass and isoelectric point were 49 kDa and 4.9, respectively. The amino acid sequence of Gaa16A showed features typical of glycosyl hydrolase family 16 (GH16) β-agarases, including a GH16 domain, carbohydrate-binding region (RICIN domain), and signal peptide. Recombinant Gaa16A (excluding the signal peptide and carbohydrate-binding region, rGaa16A) was expressed as a fused protein with maltose-binding protein at its N-terminus in Escherichia coli. rGaa16A had maximum activity at 55°C and pH 7.0 and 103 U/mg of specific activity in the presence of 2.5 mM CaCl2. The enzyme hydrolyzed agarose to yield neoagarotetraose as the main product. This enzyme may be useful for industrial production of functional neoagaro-oligosaccharides..

Keywords: Gilvimarinus, agarase, neoagaro-oligosaccharides, cloning, over-expression

Introduction

Agar is a complex polysaccharide found in the cell walls of some red algae, and up to 70% of the algal cell wall can be made up of agar polymers [1]. Agarose and agaropectin are major components of agar [2]. Agarose contains D-galactose and 3,6-anhydro-L-galactose as its monomeric units, which are linked by alternating α-1,3- and β-1,4-glycosidic bonds [3]. The hydrolysis of agarose is accomplished by α-agarase (E.C. 3.2.1.158) and β-agarase (E.C. 3.2.1.81). First, the α-1,3 linkage of agarose is cleaved, resulting in agaro-oligosaccharides, and the β-1,4 linkage is then cleaved to generate neoagaro-oligosaccharides [2]. Most agarases that are currently being studied and utilized are β-agarases. On the basis of on amino acid sequence homology, β-agarases are classified into four families: glycoside hydrolase family 16 (GH16), GH50, GH86, and GH118 [4]. The reported biological and physiological functions of neoagaro-oligosaccharides, including their moisturizing effect on the skin [5], whitening effect on melanoma cells [6], macrophage stimulation [7], antitumor activity [8], prebiotic effects [9], and antibacterial activity [10], have increased their value while simultaneously broadening their applications in the food, cosmetic, and medical industries.

The isolation of agar-degrading bacteria has been accomplished with different natural sources such as seawater, marine sediments, marine algae, marine mollusks, fresh water, and soil [2]. In microorganisms, many agarases have been reported from Agarivorans sp. [11], Alteromonas sp. [12], Pseudomonas sp. [13, 14], Vibrio sp. [15, 16], Pseudoalteromonas sp. [17], Bacillus sp. [18, 19], Microbulbifer sp. [20, 21], Saccharophagus sp. [22], Acinetobacter sp. [23], among others. Recently, Gilvimarinus chinensis [24], Gilvimarinus polysaccharolyticus [25], and Gilvimarinus agarilyticus [26] were described, and their agarolytic activity was reported. However, there have been no published reports that include the molecular and functional characterization of agarases from the Gilvimarinus genus. Previously, we isolated the agar-degrading bacterium Gilvimarinus agarilyticus JEA5 and reported its draft genome sequence [27]. In this study, we report the first molecular and biochemical characterization of agarase from the Gilvimarinus genus.

Materials and Methods

Identification and Molecular Characterization of β-Agarase

Previously, we reported that the agar-degrading bacterium G. agarilyticus JEA5 was isolated from Jeju Island, South Korea. We described identification of that strain using 16S rRNA and genome sequencing with next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology [27]. A putative agarase was identified with the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool algorithm [28] and designated Gaa16A.

The signal peptide of Gaa16A was predicted using the SignalP 4.1 server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/) [29], and the percentage identity/similarity of this agarase against homologs was calculated with the EMBOSS Pairwise Sequence Alignment Tool (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/psa/) [30]. Active sites, catalytic sites, and functional domains were identified with the use of the following programs: NCBI Conserved Domains Database (CDD; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd/) [31], Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/)[32], and the InterPro web program (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro) [33, 34].

Cloning of Gaa16A

To amplify the predicted agarase gene gaa16a, a primer set (Gaa16A-F and Gaa16A-R) was designed to bind the pMal-c2x site with >15 bp nucleotide coverage at the cloning site using the pMal-c2x sequence. The primers are shown in Table 1. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the gaa16a gene was performed with LA Taq polymerase (TaKaRa, Japan). We removed the predicted signal sequences at the N-terminus of Gaa16A, as well as the RICIN superfamily domain at the C-terminus. The pMal-c2x expression vector (New England Biolabs, UK) was digested, and the amplicons were digested with BamHI (TaKaRa, Japan) and SalI (TaKaRa, Japan) restriction enzymes at 37°C for 2 h, following the manufacturer’s instructions. The digested pMal-c2x expression vector was gel purified using the AccuPrep Gel Purification Kit (Bioneer, Korea). The Gaa16A PCR product was cloned into the digested pMal-c2x expression vector with the Ez-Fusion Cloning Kit (Enzynomics, Korea) following the manufacturer’s protocol, and the recombinant plasmid was then transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α. The clone was purified using the AccuPrep Nano-Plus Plasmid Mini Extraction Kit (Bioneer, Korea) and then again transformed into the expression vector E. coli BL21 (DE3). Finally, the nucleotide sequence of the newly constructed recombinant plasmid was confirmed by sequencing (Macrogen, Korea).

Table 1 . PCR primer set for amplification of the gaa16a gene without the RICIN domain-coding region..

NameSequencePurpose
gaa1-F5'-TTC AGA ATT CGG ATC GCC GAC TGG GAT AAC AC-3'Gaa1 amplification without RICIN
gaa1-R5'-TTG CCT GCA GGT CGA CTA TTG ACG ACC TTT AAT GCT G-3'Gaa1 amplification without RICIN


Overexpression and Purification of Recombinant Agarase

E. coli BL21 (DE3) containing pMal-c2x-gaa16a was inoculated into 5 ml of LB broth supplemented with ampicillin (100 mg/ml) and cultured overnight at 37°C. The overnight culture was transferred into 250 ml of fresh LB broth supplemented with ampicillin (100 mg/ml) and incubated with shaking at 37°C until the culture reached an optical density of 0.6 at 600 nm. Isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactoside was added to a final concentration of 1 mM. To overexpress the recombinant protein, the cultures were incubated at 37°C for 3 h. Cells from the 250 ml culture were pelleted by centrifugation at 1,800 ×g for 15 min and resuspended in 20 ml of column buffer before storing at -20°C overnight. Frozen cells were thawed on ice, sonicated, and centrifuged (13,000 ×g, 20 min, 4°C). rGaa116A was purified from the supernatant using the pMal Protein Fusion & Purification System (New England Biolabs, USA). Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed to analyze the purified protein, and the protein concentration was determined using the BCA Protein Assay Reagent Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA).

Agarolytic Activity Assay

The amount of reducing sugar was determined by a modified 3,5-dintrosalicylic acid method [17, 35] using D-galactose as the standard. The amount of enzyme required to produce 1 μmol of reduced sugar per minute was defined as one unit of enzyme activity. Substrate was prepared using SeaKem LE Agarose (Lonza, Switzerland) dissolved in deionized water by boiling, and then cooled to 45°C. The enzyme reaction mixture was prepared in a 200 μl total volume containing 100 μl of 1% agarose (final concentration 0.5%), 95 μl of the proper buffer, and 5 μl of diluted recombinant enzyme. The optimum pH of rGaa16A was determined over a pH range of 3.0–10.0 with intervals of pH 0.5 at 50°C for 20 min. Citrate phosphate buffer (pH 3.0–6.0), phosphate buffer (pH 6.0–8.0), and glycine-NaOH buffer (pH 8.0–10.0) were used for various pH conditions. The optimum temperature for the enzyme activity of rGaa16A was determined by monitoring the relative activity at temperatures ranging (in 5°C intervals) from 40°C to 75°C at the optimum pH of 8.0 for 20 min. The thermostability of rGaa16A was measured at 50°C and pH 8.0 after preincubation at temperatures of 40°C, 50°C, and 60°C for 30, 60, and 90 min. The sensitivities of rGaa16A to various metal ion salts and chelators were determined under optimal pH and temperature conditions in reaction mixtures supplemented with 2.5 mM CaCl2, CuSO4, EDTA, FeSO4, KCl, MgSO4, MnCl2, NaCl, or ZnSO4.

Hydrolytic Product Analysis

The hydrolytic product of agarose from the recombinant enzyme rGaa16A was identified using thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Enzymatic hydrolysis of agarose was carried out at 45°C for 1 h in distilled water containing 10 μl of rGaa16A and 90 μl of 0.5%agarose. The mixture was applied to a silica gel 60 TLC plate (Merck, Germany) and developed with n-butanol:acetic acid:dH2O (2:1:1 (v/v)). Spots were visualized by spraying with an orcinol dip reagent (80 mg of orcine monohydrate dissolved in 160 ml of acetone; 8 ml of sulfuric acid then added), followed by heating at 100°C for 10 min. D-(+)-Galactose (Riedel de Haen, Germany), neoagarobiose (Carbosynth, UK), neoagarotetraose (Carbosynth, UK), and neoagarohexaose (Carbosynth, UK) were used as standards.

Results

Molecular Characterization of Gaa16A

The nucleotide and amino acid sequences of Gaa16A have been submitted to NCBI under accession number KP716979. gaa16a has a 1,323-bp open reading frame that encodes 441 amino acids. The molecular mass and isoelectric point were predicted to be 49 kDa and 4.9, respectively. A signal sequence is located in the N-terminal region (amino acid positions 1–22). Conserved GH16 and RICIN superfamily (ricin-type beta-trefoil; carbohydrate-binding domain formed from presumed gene triplication) sequences were identified at amino acid positions 19–289 and 307–440, respectively. We assumed that the catalytic residues of Gaa16A were 145-Glu, 147-Asp, and 150-Glu in the GH16 catalytic domain. The predicted calcium-binding sites were observed at the amino acid positions 20-Asp, 46-Asn, and 283-Asp. Gaa16A showed the highest identity with hypothetical proteins from G. chinensis (GenBank Accession No. WP_020208752.1) and G. polysaccharolyticus (WP_049721016.1), as well as a predicted agarase from Pseudomonas sp. ND137 (BAB79291.1)(Table 2). However, there are no published characterization or overexpression studies on these proteins. These sequences, including Gaa16A, showed less than 71% similarity with characterized agarases, such as those from Catenovulum agarivorans YM01 and Agarivorans sp. LQ48.

Table 2 . Identity and similarity of rGaa16A compared with amino acid sequences of other predicted agarase sequences and characterized agarases..

Identity (%)Similarity (%)Gap (%)Accession No.Remark
Pseudomonas sp. ND13797.798.60.0BAB79291.1Uncharacterized
Gilvimarinus chinensis94.897.50.0WP_020208752.1Uncharacterized
Gilvimarinus polysaccharolyticus91.296.10.0WP_049721016.1Uncharacterized
Catenovulum agarivorans YM0154.470.54.8AGU13985.1Characterized
Agarivorans sp. LQ4840.657.78.9ACM50513.1Characterized
Bacteroides plebeius DSM 1713534.943.336.9EDY95404.1Characterized
Microbulbifer agarilyticus32.744.034.4BAE06228.1Characteriaed


Expression and Purification of Recombinant Agarase

Maltose binding protein (MBP)-tagged recombinant Gaa16A protein (with the RICIN superfamily domain removed) was overexpressed in E. coli (BL21) and purified using the pMAL Protein Fusion and Purification System. The purified recombinant protein was identified by the strong band on the SDS-PAGE gel (Fig. 1), which was similar to the predicted molecular mass (33 kDa with 42 kDa of MBP).

Figure 1. SDS-PAGE analysis of purified rGaa16A. M: Molecular weight marker; Lane 1: whole-cell lysates before induction; lane 2: whole-cell lysates after induction; lane 3: soluble fraction after cell lysis; lane 4: insoluble fraction after cell lysis; lane 5: purified rGaa16A.

Enzymatic Characterization of Recombinant Agarase

The recombinant agarase rGaa16A showed its highest agarolytic activity at 55°C, and over 80% of its activity remained at 65°C (Fig.2A); however, its activity was dramatically decreased to less than 20% at 70°C. The optimum pH of rGaa16A was 7 (Fig. 2B). The activity of the enzyme increased gradually from pH 5 to 7, and it then dramatically decreased at pH 10. The thermostability of rGaa16A is shown in Figs.2C and 2D; rGaa16A was stable with over 80% of its activity after pre-incubation at 50°C for 60 min. However, it showed low stability, retaining less than 50% of its activity at 55°C after preincubation for 30 min. Interestingly, the thermostability of rGaa16A was improved in the presence of CaCl2. The effects of metal ions, salts, and chelators on rGaa16A activity are shown in Fig.3. The activity of rGaa16A was significantly inhibited by CuSO4, and ZnSO4, whereas its activity was enhanced by CaCl2, MnCl2, NaCl, and FeSO4.

Figure 2. Biochemical properties of rGaa16A. Optimum temperature (A), optimum pH (B), and thermal stability at 50°C (C) and at 55°C (D).

Figure 3. Effects of chemicals and metal ions on the agarolytic activity of rGaa16A.

The specific activity of rGaa16A is shown in Table 3. rGaa16A exhibited specific activity toward agarose at 103.5 U/mg. rGaa16A maintained its activity well in the presence of CaCl2. In the absence of CaCl2, rGaa16A activity was only 63 and 67 U/mg at 50°C and 60°C, respectively. Meanwhile, it was 101.5 and 84.3 U/mg at 50°C and 60°C, respectively, in the presence of CaCl2.

Table 3 . Specific activity of rGaa16A..

TempSpecific activity (Unit/mg, μmole/mg/min)

rGaa16ArGaa16A +CaCl2
50°C63.1±7.5101.5±5.1
55°C103.5±5.9102.7±3.7
60°C67.9±6.884.3±0.7

The specific activity was analyzed at 50°C, 55°C, and 60°C in the presence and absence of CaCl2..



Hydrolysis Product of rGaa16A

The enzyme reaction products of rGaa16A were identified using TLC, which revealed that rGaa16A catalyzed the rapid degradation of agar to neoagarotetraose (NA4), neoagarohexaose (NA6), neoagaro-oligosaccharides, and neoagaro-oligosaccharides larger than NA8 as products of the early stage of the reaction (Fig. 4A). After 60 min of incubation, NA4 and NA6, as well as trace amounts of compounds larger than NA8, were present. Finally, only NA4 was observed after overnight incubation (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4. TLC analysis of the rGaa16A enzyme hydrolysis products from agarose and neogaro-oligosaccharides. The hydrolytic products of rGaa16A activity toward agarose for 10, 20, 30, and 60 min, and neoagaro-oligosaccharides for 60 and 120 min (A) and hydrolytic product after overnight (B) were developed in silica gel 60 plate. D-Galactose (G), neoagarobiose (NA2), neoagarotetraose (NA4), and neogarohexaose (NA6) were used as standards (STD).

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to molecularly characterize and analyze the biochemical properties of a new β-agarase identified in G. agarilyticus JEA5, the first report of such an enzyme isolated from the genus Gilvimarinus. The genomic DNA sequence was obtained from G. agarilyticus JEA5 using NGS technology. The amino acid sequence of Gaa16A has features typical of GH16 family β-agarases, such as a GH16 domain and RICIN superfamily domain, known to be a carbohydrate recognition region. The presence of RICIN improves functional capabilities, such as enzymatic activity, inhibitory toxicity, and signal transduction. This domain has been shown in some instances to bind simple sugars, such as galactose or lactose [36, 37]. Most GH16 β-agarases consist of two main functional domains GH16 catalytic domain and carbohydrate-binding module 6, but the RICIN superfamily in the C-terminal region also has been reported from some GH16 family β-agarases, such as YM01-3 from Catenovulum agarivorans YM01T [38], AgaH92 from Pseudoalteromonas sp. H9 [39], and AgaV from Vibrio sp. V134 [40].

Full-length rGaa16A without the signal peptide and two truncated derivatives (including the carbohydrate-binding module and a sequence without RICIN) were expressed in E. coli. The carbohydrate-binding region (RICIN domain) of recombinant agarase exhibited low agarolytic activity (data not shown), whereas high agarolytic activity was observed when recombinant agarase was overexpressed without the RICIN region. This result is similar to the behavior of agarase AgaD from the marine bacterium Vibrio sp. strain PO-303 [41]. rAgaD containing only the catalytic module without the carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) also showed higher agarolytic activity than CBM-containing recombinant AgaD.

The optimum temperature of rGaa16A was observed at 55°C, which was higher than the gelling temperature of agar (>40°C), and the activity of rGaa16A was retained at 50°C after preincubation for 90 min. The ability of an enzyme to convert agar into oligosaccharide while maintaining high catalytic activity and thermostability at temperatures above the gelling temperature may be advantageous for different applications. Tightly arranged bundles of gelled agar obstruct enzymatic degradation; therefore, other known agarases also show optimum temperatures that are higher than the gelling temperature [4, 19]. The optimum pH of rGaa16A was neutral. This result is similar to previous reports for marine-derived agarases. Although a few agarases, such as AgaC from Vibrio sp. PO-303 and AgaB from Pseudoalteromonas sp. CY24, have been reported to have optimum activity at pH 6.5 and 5.5, respectively [42, 43], most agarases exhibit maximum activity at a neutral or a weakly alkaline pH [2]. It is well known that natural seawater has a weakly alkaline pH. For these reasons, marine-derived agarases typically exhibit optimal activity under neutral or weakly alkaline conditions.

The activity of rGaa16A increased in the presence of 2.5 mM CaCl2. Additionally, in the specific activity test, we found that rGaa16A maintained its activity well at a high temperature of 60°C (Table 3) in the presence of CaCl2. The amino acid sequence of Gaa16A contains three predicted calcium-binding sites. Several studies have reported that CaCl2 is not involved in the catalytic machinery, but it has been shown to have a stabilizing effect in family GH16. However, in our study, the presence of calcium ions had a significant effect on rGaa16A activity (approximately 19%increase) and strongly enhanced the thermostability of rGaa16A.

Agarases belonging to the same GH family exhibit similar patterns of agarose degradation. The end product or main product is NA4 for most reported GH16 β-agarases [2]. rGaa16A also hydrolyzed agarose to NA4, similar to results reported previously for GH16 family agarases. NA4 exhibited several bioactivities, such as a whitening effect [44], antioxidative activity, a prebiotic effect [45], and an anti-inflammatory effect [46].

In conclusion, a GH16 family β-agarase gene (gaa16a) was isolated from the draft genome sequence of the marine bacterium G. agarilyticus JEA5. The recombinant β-agarase (rGaa16A) was overexpressed and purified, and its biochemical properties were analyzed, representing the first agarase characterized from the genus Gilvimarinus. rGaa16A was stable at temperatures below 50°C, and the optimum temperature was higher than the gelling temperature of agar. Moreover, its activity and stability were improved in the presence of CaCl2. rGaa16A hydrolyzed agarose to NA4, which has diverse physiological and biological activities with great economic value. Therefore, this enzyme can be used for different industrial applications, such as in the cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and food industries.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by collective research grants from the Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology (PE0129C) and “Development of integrated technologies for developing biomaterials using by magma seawater” (20170326) funded by the Ministry of Ocean and Fisheries, Korea.

Conflict of Interest


The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.SDS-PAGE analysis of purified rGaa16A. M: Molecular weight marker; Lane 1: whole-cell lysates before induction; lane 2: whole-cell lysates after induction; lane 3: soluble fraction after cell lysis; lane 4: insoluble fraction after cell lysis; lane 5: purified rGaa16A.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2018; 28: 776-783https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1709.09050

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Biochemical properties of rGaa16A. Optimum temperature (A), optimum pH (B), and thermal stability at 50°C (C) and at 55°C (D).
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2018; 28: 776-783https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1709.09050

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Effects of chemicals and metal ions on the agarolytic activity of rGaa16A.
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2018; 28: 776-783https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1709.09050

Fig 4.

Figure 4.TLC analysis of the rGaa16A enzyme hydrolysis products from agarose and neogaro-oligosaccharides. The hydrolytic products of rGaa16A activity toward agarose for 10, 20, 30, and 60 min, and neoagaro-oligosaccharides for 60 and 120 min (A) and hydrolytic product after overnight (B) were developed in silica gel 60 plate. D-Galactose (G), neoagarobiose (NA2), neoagarotetraose (NA4), and neogarohexaose (NA6) were used as standards (STD).
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2018; 28: 776-783https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1709.09050

Table 1 . PCR primer set for amplification of the gaa16a gene without the RICIN domain-coding region..

NameSequencePurpose
gaa1-F5'-TTC AGA ATT CGG ATC GCC GAC TGG GAT AAC AC-3'Gaa1 amplification without RICIN
gaa1-R5'-TTG CCT GCA GGT CGA CTA TTG ACG ACC TTT AAT GCT G-3'Gaa1 amplification without RICIN

Table 2 . Identity and similarity of rGaa16A compared with amino acid sequences of other predicted agarase sequences and characterized agarases..

Identity (%)Similarity (%)Gap (%)Accession No.Remark
Pseudomonas sp. ND13797.798.60.0BAB79291.1Uncharacterized
Gilvimarinus chinensis94.897.50.0WP_020208752.1Uncharacterized
Gilvimarinus polysaccharolyticus91.296.10.0WP_049721016.1Uncharacterized
Catenovulum agarivorans YM0154.470.54.8AGU13985.1Characterized
Agarivorans sp. LQ4840.657.78.9ACM50513.1Characterized
Bacteroides plebeius DSM 1713534.943.336.9EDY95404.1Characterized
Microbulbifer agarilyticus32.744.034.4BAE06228.1Characteriaed

Table 3 . Specific activity of rGaa16A..

TempSpecific activity (Unit/mg, μmole/mg/min)

rGaa16ArGaa16A +CaCl2
50°C63.1±7.5101.5±5.1
55°C103.5±5.9102.7±3.7
60°C67.9±6.884.3±0.7

The specific activity was analyzed at 50°C, 55°C, and 60°C in the presence and absence of CaCl2..


References

  1. Chi WJ, Chang YK, Hong SK. 2012. Agar degradation by microorganisms and agar-degrading enzymes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 94: 917-930.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Fu XT, Kim SM. 2010. Agarase: review of major sources, categories, purification method, enzyme characteristics and applications. Mar. Drugs 8: 200-218.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Araki C. 1956. Structure of the agarose constituent of agaragar. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 29: 543-544.
    CrossRef
  4. Mai Z, Su H, Zhang S. 2016. Isolation and characterization of a glycosyl hydrolase family 16 beta-agarase from a mangrove soil metagenomic library. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17: E1360.
    CrossRef
  5. Kobayashi R, Takisada M, Suzuki T, Kirimura K, Usami S. 1997. Neoagarobiose as a novel moisturizer with whitening effect. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 61: 162-163.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Yun EJ, Lee S, Kim JH, Kim BB, Kim HT, Lee SH, et al. 2013. Enzymatic production of 3,6-anhydro-L-galactose from agarose and its purification and in vitro skin whitening and anti-inflammatory activities. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97: 2961-2970.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Yoshizawa Y, Ametani A, Tsunehiro J, Nomura K, Itoh M, Fukui F, et al. 1995. Macrophage stimulation activity of the polysaccharide fraction from a marine alga (Porphyra yezoensis): structure-function relationships and improved solubility. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 59: 1933-1937.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Fernandez LE, Valiente OG, Mainardi V, Bello JL, Velez H, Rosado A. 1989. Isolation and characterization of an antitumor active agar-type polysaccharide of Gracilaria dominguensis. Carbohydr. Res. 190: 77-83.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Hu B, Gong Q, Wang Y, Ma Y, Li J, Yu W. 2006. Prebiotic effects of neoagaro-oligosaccharides prepared by enzymatic hydrolysis of agarose. Anaerobe 12: 260-266.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Jang M-K, Lee OKH, Yoo KH, Lee D-G, Lee S-H. 2007. Secretory overexpression of β-agarase in Bacillus subtilis and antibacterial activity of enzymatic products. J. Life Sci. 17: 1601-1604.
    CrossRef
  11. Fu XT, Pan CH, Lin H, Kim SM. 2009. Gene cloning, expression, and characterization of a beta-agarase, agaB34, from Agarivorans albus YKW-34. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19: 257-264.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Leon O, Quintana L, Peruzzo G, Slebe JC. 1992. Purification and properties of an extracellular agarase from Alteromonas sp. strain C-1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58: 4060-4063.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Ha JC, Kim GT, Kim SK, Oh TK, Yu JH, Kong IS. 1997. beta-agarase from Pseudomonas sp. W7: purification of the recombinant enzyme from Escherichia coli and the effects of salt on its activity. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 26: 1-6.purification.
    Pubmed
  14. Lee S, Park J, Yoon S, Kim J, Kong I. 2000. Sequence analysis of a beta-agarase gene (pjaA) from Pseudomonas sp. isolated from marine environment. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 89: 485-488.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Sugano Y, Matsumoto T, Kodama H, Noma M. 1993. Cloning and sequencing of agaA, a unique agarase 0107 gene from a marine bacterium, Vibrio sp. strain JT0107. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59: 3750-3756.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. Sugano Y, Terada I, Arita M, Noma M, Matsumoto T. 1993. Purification and characterization of a new agarase from a marine bacterium, Vibrio sp. strain JT0107. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59: 1549-1554.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. Oh C, Nikapitiya C, Lee Y, Whang I, Kim SJ, Kang DH, et al. 2010. Cloning, purification and biochemical characterization of beta agarase from the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. AG4. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 37: 483-494.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Suzuki H, Sawai Y, Suzuki T, Kawai K. 2003. Purification and characterization of an extracellular β-agarase from Bacillus sp. MK03. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 95: 328-334.
    CrossRef
  19. Li J, Sha Y, Seswita-Zilda D, Hu Q, He P. 2014. Purification and characterization of thermostable agarase from Bacillus sp. BI-3, a thermophilic bacterium isolated from hot spring. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24: 19-25.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Ohta Y, Hatada Y, Nogi Y, Li Z, Ito S, Horikoshi K. 2004. Cloning, expression, and characterization of a glycoside hydrolase family 86 beta-agarase from a deep-sea Microbulbifer- like isolate. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 66: 266-275.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Kim DK, Jang YR, Kim KH, Lee MN, Kim AR, Jo EJ, et al. 2011. Isolation and culture properties of a thermophilic agarase-producing strain, Microbulbifer sp. SD-1. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 14: 186-191.
    CrossRef
  22. Lee Y, Oh C, De Zoysa M, Kim H, Wickramaarachchi WD, Whang I, et al. 2013. Molecular cloning, overexpression, and enzymatic characterization of glycosyl hydrolase family 16 beta-agarase from marine bacterium Saccharophagus sp. AG21 in Escherichia coli. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 23: 913-922.
    CrossRef
  23. Lakshmikanth M, Manohar S, Lalitha J. 2009. Purification and characterization of β-agarase from agar-liquefying soil bacterium, Acinetobacter sp. , AG LSL-1. Process Biochem. 44: 999-1003.
    CrossRef
  24. Du ZJ, Zhang DC, Liu SN, Chen JX, Tian XL, Zhang ZN, et al. 2009. Gilvimarinus chinensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an agar-digesting marine bacterium within the class Gammaproteobacteria isolated from coastal seawater in Qingdao, China. Int. J. System. Evol. Microbiol. 59: 2987-2990.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Cheng H, Zhang S, Huo YY, Jiang XW, Zhang XQ, Pan J, et al. 2015. Gilvimarinus polysaccharolyticus sp. nov., an agardigesting bacterium isolated from seaweed, and emended description of the genus Gilvimarinus. Int. J. System. Evol. Microbiol. 65: 562-569.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Kim BC, Kim MN, Lee KH, Kim HS, Min SR, Shin KS. 2011. Gilvimarinus agarilyticus sp. nov., a new agar-degrading bacterium isolated from the seashore of Jeju Island. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 100: 67-73.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Lee Y, Lee SJ, Park GH, Heo SJ, Umasuthan N, Kang DH, et al. 2015. Draft genome of agar-degrading marine bacterium Gilvimarinus agarilyticus JEA5. Mar. Genomics 21: 13-14.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. 2011. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods 8: 785-786.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  30. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947-2948.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Marchler-Bauer A, Lu S, Anderson JB, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, et al. 2011. CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 39: D225-D229.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P. 2012. SMART 7: recent updates to the protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 40: D302-D305.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  33. Finn RD, Attwood TK, Babbitt PC, Bateman A, Bork P, Bridge AJ, et al. 2017. InterPro in 2017 - beyond protein family and domain annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 45: D190-D199.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, et al. 2014. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30: 1236-1240.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  35. Sumner JB. 1924. The estimation of sugar in diabetic urine, using dinitrosalicylic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 62: 287-290.
    CrossRef
  36. Swimmer C, Lehar SM, McCafferty J, Chiswell DJ, Blattler WA, Guild BC. 1992. Phage display of ricin B chain and its single binding domains: system for screening galactosebinding mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 3756-3760.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  37. Dodd RB, Drickamer K. 2001. Lectin-like proteins in model organisms: implications for evolution of carbohydrate-binding activity. Glycobiology 11: 71R-79R.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  38. Cui F, Dong S, Shi X, Zhao X, Zhang XH. 2014. Overexpression and characterization of a novel thermostable beta-agarase YM01-3, from marine bacterium Catenovulum agarivorans YM01(T). Mar. Drugs 12: 2731-2747.
    CrossRef
  39. Chi WJ, Lee CR, Dugerjonjuu S, Park JS, Kang DK, Hong SK. 2015. Biochemical characterization of a novel iron-dependent GH16 beta-agarase, AgaH92, from an agarolytic bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. H9. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 362: fnv035.
    CrossRef
  40. Zhang WW, Sun L. 2007. Cloning, characterization, and molecular application of a beta-agarase gene from Vibrio sp. strain V134. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 2825-2831.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  41. Dong J, Tamaru Y, Araki T. 2007. Molecular cloning, expression, and characterization of a beta-agarase gene, agaD, from a marine bacterium, Vibrio sp. strain PO-303. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 71: 38-46.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Dong J, Hashikawa S, Konishi T, Tamaru Y, Araki T. 2006. Cloning of the novel gene encoding beta-agarase C from a marine bacterium, Vibrio sp. strain PO-303, and characterization of the gene product. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 6399-6401.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  43. Ma C, Lu X, Shi C, Li J, Gu Y, Ma Y, et al. 2007. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel beta-agarase, AgaB, from marine Pseudoalteromonas sp. CY24. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 3747-3754.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  44. Jang MK, Lee DG, Kim NY, Yu KH, Jang HJ, Lee SW, et al. 2009. Purification and characterization of neoagarotetraose from hydrolyzed agar. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19: 1197-1200.
    Pubmed
  45. Zhang N, Mao X, Li RW, Hou E, Wang Y, Xue C, et al. 2017. Neoagarotetraose protects mice against intense exercise-induced fatigue damage by modulating gut microbial composition and function. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 61: DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201600585.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  46. Wang W, Liu P, Hao C, Wu L, Wan W, Mao X. 2017. Neoagaro-oligosaccharide monomers inhibit inflammation in LPS-stimulated macrophages through suppression of MAPK and NF-κB pathways. Sci. Rep. 7: 44252.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef