Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology

eISSN 1738-8872
pISSN 1017-7825

Table. 3.

Table. 3. Table 3

Different combinations of independent and dependent variables for encapsulation of LPD2 with MD through spray drying.

Run no.	Independent variables		Dependent variables
Run no.	X₁ ¹⁾	X₂ ²⁾	Y₁ ³⁾	Y₂ ⁴⁾
1	15	103	79.15 ± 1.18^a5)	94.42 ± 0.84^de
2	15	88	74.22 ± 0.55^bcd	95.48 ± 0.23^c
3	20	80	73.30 ± 2.23^bcde	96.78 ± 0.34^b
4	20	95	72.53 ± 1.38^cde	95.78 ± 1.22^c
5	20	95	73.09 ± 0.51^bcde	95.25 ± 0.24^cd
6	25	103	75.21 ± 0.42^bc	93.31 ± 0.35^f
7	30	95	72.27 ± 3.17^de	93.77 ± 0.15^ef
8	10	95	78.86 ± 1.58^a	98.01 ± 0.24^a
9	20	95	74.91 ± 1.33^bcd	95.58 ± 0.13^c
10	25	88	70.73 ± 0.22^e	95.41 ± 0.11^c
11	20	95	74.51± 1.13^bcd	95.56 ± 0.34^c
12	20	110	75.97 ± 0.34^b	94.51 ± 0.65^de
13	20	95	73.56 ± 2.21^bcde	95.66 ± 0.37^c

¹⁾X₁ = MD concentration (%), ²⁾X₂ = Inlet temperature of spray drying (°C), ³⁾Y₁ = Encapsulation yield (%), ⁴⁾Y₂ = Viability of LPD2 (%) after encapsulation, ⁵⁾mean ± sd (n = 3)

^a-eMeans with the same superscript are not significantly different by Duncan’s test (p < 0.05)

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024;34:1051~1058 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2401.01019