Mechanisms and Control Strategies of Antibiotic Resistance in Pathological Biofilms
1Department of Pharmacy, Hangzhou Geriatric Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, P.R. China
2Department of Pharmacy, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, P.R. China
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021; 31(1): 1-7
Published January 28, 2021
Copyright © The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology.
Biofilms are protected microbial structures enclosed by a self-secreted extracellular matrix . Bacteria biofilm is one of the most successful forms of life, being widely distributed in a diversity of environments . All higher organisms (including humans) are colonized by microorganisms that form biofilms, mostly bacteria . The ability of biofilms to escape the host immune system and resist antibiotics poses great health threats to patients [4, 5].
Biofilm formation contributes to drug resistance and inflammation, causing persistent infections in patients . Biofilms also function as cell reservoirs that can repopulate infection sites after the release of suppression. For example, biofilm formation is a major concern for cystic fibrosis pneumonia caused by
Structure and Characteristics of Bacterial Biofilm
The physical scaffold of a biofilm is the matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs), self-secreted substances that keep bacterial cells in a contained structure and attach them to surfaces . Most of the biomass of the biofilm is hydrated EPS rather than bacterial cells, which only make up between 2% to 15% of the total biofilm mass . EPS is mostly composed of polysaccharides, proteins, lipids and extracellular DNA (eDNA) (Fig. 1) . Enhanced antimicrobial resistance, nutrient capture and social cooperation are three main characteristic features of biofilms, and the EPS matrix underlies these important properties . The structures of biofilms somewhat resembles tissues of higher organisms, which are structurally complex and highly heterogenous in gene expression , both contributing to the resistance mechanisms of biofilm.
Structure and life cycle of bacterial biofilms.(1) Initial surface attachment of planktonic bacteria cells; (2) cell to cell adhesion and biofilm growth; (3) biofilm maturation; and (4) cell detachment and biofilm dispersal. Polysaccharides, nucleic acids, protein and lipids are major components of biofilms. The biofilm form of bacteria is resistant to many environmental insults, including UV light, antibiotics, and salinity. Anti-biofilm methods mentioned in this review are shown, indicated with green arrows at the locations where they act.
Life Cycle of Bacterial Biofilms
The transition from planktonic growth to biofilm is a complex and highly regulated process that follows a few steps (Fig. 1). The first step is the initial attachment of planktic bacterial cells to a surface, which often happens when cells are under environmental stress. The propelling structures, such as appendages, fimbriae and sex pili, have important roles in the initiation of biofilm . The aggregation interactions can be either non-specific or ligand-receptor mediated [12, 13]. At this stage, single seeding cells are barely covered by EPS. Next, the seeded bacteria cells multiply and secret quorum sensing molecules that dictate the gene expression of the biofilm , which will be discussed in detail below. One of the most important changes is the increased secretion of EPS, which fills the spaces between bacterial cells and provide the structural rigidity. Rapid proliferation and aggregation of bacteria follow and increase the volume of the biofilm dramatically, until it adopts the signature morphology of a mushroom-like architecture . The volume of a mature biofilm is made up mostly by EPS, as well as polysaccharides, lipids, protein and external DNA . The matured structure is essential for the antibiotic resistance of enclosed bacteria. However, EPS not only blocks the access of environmental stresses but also limits the exchange of essential substances, causing the accumulation of metabolic products that may be toxic. At this stage, bacteria within the biofilm start the self-dissolving program by secreting EPS-digesting hydrolases. When EPS is digested, the embedded bacteria is released as free planktic cells, ready to seed new surfaces (Fig. 1). The planktonic cell-biofilm cycle is a major source of recurrent infections and chronic infections .
Hospital-acquired, nosocomial, and medical device-originated infections are the most common forms of biofilm-related infections . Biofilm-associated chronic infections are often highly resistant to antibiotic treatment, and they are very common in nosocomial infections such as hospital-acquired infections with extremely high mortality rates . Fungal and bacterial biofilms account for approximately 65%-80% of all hospital-acquired infections, in which the urinary tract, respiratory tract and bloodstream are the major locations of biofilm-associated nosocomial infections, because those are common locations for plantation of internal medical devices [17, 18]. Hence, biofilms pose a public health problem for patients needing indwelling medical devices, especially for those who are already immune-compromised . Biofilms on medical devices are notoriously difficult to remove once they form. On one hand, biofilm formation is surprisingly quick and seemingly irreversible after initiation . On the other hand, detached planktonic bacterial cells frequently recolonize and cause recurrent infections. With the increasing number of implantation surgeries, a better understanding of resistance mechanisms and counteracting strategies of biofilms-associated infections is urgently needed (discussed below).
Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance in Biofilms
Complex Structures of Biofilm a Natural Defense
EPS is not only critical for the architecture of biofilms, it is also a physical barrier that shields and protects embedded bacterial cells from environmental insults such as antibiotics and ultraviolet (UV) light [20, 21](Fig. 1). For example, the negatively charged polysaccharides can effectively block the penetration of the positively charged, aminoglycoside-class of antibiotics through binding . The EPS barrier also delays the diffusion of small molecules such as hydrogen peroxide to bacterial cells within the biofilm. It has been shown that planktonic
Heterogeneity of Biofilms Contributes to Resistance
The heterogeneity of the conditions inside the biofilm prevents the total eradication of all bacterial cells by certain insults. In a sense, biofilms ‘never put all their eggs in one basket’. For example, there are nutrient and oxygen gradients from top to the bottom of biofilms. With the decease of nutrients and oxygen, cells at the bottom have decreased metabolic activity and growth rate . Counterintuitively, it is the more dormant cells who contribute most to antibiotic resistance. In fact, almost all antibiotics kill the fast-growing cells more effectively . In addition, the protein expression profile of biofilm is very different and more diverse than planktonic cells, which may drive the bacteria resistance. For instance,
Antibiotic Resistance through Quorum Sensing
Quorum sensing (QS) in bacteria is a mechanism of inter-cell communication using signal molecules, which are activated and secreted to coordinate community behaviors to defend against unfavorable environmental conditions. QS is a major mechanism for activation and formation of bacterial biofilms, negating the effectiveness of antibiotics against pathological bacteria . Environmental factors such as antibiotics, pH, salt concentration, and nutrition deprivation modulate QS-mediated functioning in biofilms . The feed forward mechanism amplifies QS signaling in the biofilm community . When the concentration of the QS signal molecules reaches a threshold, synchronized behavior of bacteria is triggered, leading to social activities such as biofilm formation . The QS signal is subsequently translated into cells to modulate the expression level of genes. These genes are important for cells to adjust to their environment, including genes that are involved in biofilm formation . The secretion systems of bacteria are also highly regulated by QS signal, including the multidrug efflux pumps [34, 35] and EPS secretion systems [15, 36].
There are three major types of bacterial QS signal molecules, namely acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs), oligopeptides, and autoinducers . Other molecules such as indole have been reported to function as a QS molecules in several microorganisms [38, 39]. Gram-negative bacteria frequently utilize the diffusible AHLs as QS molecules, while gram-positive bacteria use peptide-based QS mechanisms . A better understanding of QS signal molecules will provide critical information for the development of chemicals or methods for controlling biofilm. This has become a hot research area in the search for an effective molecule that can either neutralize QS molecules or compete with their receptors [41-43].
Increased Efflux Pumps in Biofilm Resistance
An increasing number of studies at the molecular level have shown that enhanced efflux pumps are a common and critical mechanism of antibiotic resistance in biofilms . This has been widely studied in the common pathogen
Additionally, multidrug pumps such as MexAB-OprM and the MexCD-OprJ contribute to the antibiotic resistance of biofilms, and inhibition of those pumps restores the antibiotic susceptibility of multidrug-resistant
Taken together, antibiotic resistance of biofilm is multifactorial, and a wide range of molecular mechanisms contribute to biofilm resistance. Each of the above-discussed mechanisms may only partially contributes to the increased antibiotic resistance. However, when they act in concert, those mechanisms ensure the survival of a biofilm community when facing aggressive antibiotic treatment regimens. While the resistance mechanisms of biofilms are essential for the survival of microbes, they present threats to the public health. It is critical to better understand those resistant mechanisms at molecular levels, which will make targeted therapies capable of overcoming the antibiotic resistance of biofilms.
Strategies to Overcome Antibiotic Resistant in Biofilms
Due to the above-mentioned resistance mechanisms, bacterial biofilms are difficult to eradicate even with prolonged treatments. Biofilms remain a major problem during the treatment of chronic infections. Many strategies are currently under investigation, aiming to effectively eradicate biofilm-related infections. In this section of the review, we will discuss some of the emerging strategies to overcome antibiotic resistance (also see Table 1).
Combine Physical Destruction and Antibiotic Treatment
Using ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD) in combination with antibiotics has been shown to improve the efficacy of antibiotics. For example, the use of UTMD with vancomycin significantly improves the efficacy of vancomycin against
Target the Structure of Biofilm
The integrity of biofilm structure ensures the protection of bacteria embedded within. EPS-targeting strategies have been well explored for quite some time [1, 55]. EPS-targeting can be achieved by inhibiting EPS production or secretion, blocking EPS adhesins to surface, or degrading EPS directly. The EPS disrupting agents include those that inhibit synthesis and secretion of EPS, such as cyclic-di-GMP (cdGMP) and cyclic-di-AMP (cdAMP) . More recently, small-molecule screens have identified several small molecules that inhibit EPS production, including those that inhibit glucosyltransferase  and pilus formation . EPS-degrading enzymes such as glucanohydrolases and dispersin B can enzymatically digest the EPS of pathogenic oral biofilms . Glycoside hydrolases have been shown to degrade
Block Quorum Sensing Signaling
Since QS plays a critical role in signaling biofilm formation, anti-QS agents can theoretically abolish QS signaling and prevent biofilm formation. Therefore, anti-QS agents may overcome antibiotic resistance caused by biofilm formation [29, 65]. Based on the mechanism of QS signaling, this approach can be achieved by blocking QS signal molecule production , neutralizing signal molecules [41, 67], blocking the receptors or inhibiting the signaling pathway [42, 43]. This QS-deactivating phenomenon is commonly referred to as quorum quenching (QQ). QQ methods include inhibition of QS signal molecule synthesis, sequestration of signal molecules, using receptor antagonist, and inhibition of targets in the QS signal transduction pathway . The sequestration of signal molecules can be achieved by using chemicals, antibodies, or specific enzymes .
Substantial efforts have been made to develop anti-QS inhibitors, and a lot of new anti-QS inhibitors have been reported [29, 68]. Peptide-based quorum sensing modulators are actively being developed for controlling bacterial biofilm, and this approach appears to be more effective for gram-positive bacteria [69-71]. Two types of anti-QS chemicals are particularly promising, namely phytochemicals and plant by-products . Researchers are also actively seeking natural compounds that possess anti-quorum sensing properties [43,72-74]. Anti-QS agents are mechanistically sound, promising a new class of agents to tackle biofilms.
Biofilm Targeting Recombinant Phages
Bacteriophages, the bacterial viruses, are natural enemies of bacteria. Many bacteriophages also secrete depolymerases that degrade the EPS of biofilms, which makes them ideal for targeting biofilms . To maximize the effect of phage against biofilms, multiple bacteriophages can be combined to formulate super phage mix or so-called ‘phage cocktail’ . In addition, some strains of bacteriophages naturally contain a cocktail of depolymerases. For example, bacteriophage K, a polyvalent
In addition to the strategies discussed above, other ways to prevent or inhibit biofilms have been studied. For example, techniques using physics principals have been explored. Nanoparticles are currently being widely investigated as a novel treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria, and the anti-biofilm properties of nanoparticles are likely to be one of the mechanisms . TiO2 (Titanium dioxide) nanoparticles have been shown to prevent biofilms formed by
In summary, many anti-biofilm strategies are currently being investigated, including targeting EPS, blocking quorum sensing, engineered bacteriophage, and combining antibiotics with other methods such as physical destruction, nanoparticles and electric currents (Table 1). Given biofilms are notoriously resistant to many antimicrobial monotherapies, the combination of antibiotics and alternative therapy has great potential to enhance the effectiveness of antibiotics in bacterial biofilm infections. The anti-biofilm strategies that we discussed above can be combined with traditional antibiotics treatment regimens to achieve better efficacy.
In this review, we summarized the characteristics and life cycles of bacterial biofilms and clinically associated biofilms. We reviewed the current progress in biofilm research, focusing on the mechanisms by which biofilms become resistant to antibiotic treatment. We also reviewed the current basic and translational research studies on how to overcome antibiotics resistance associated with biofilm. Although there has been tremendous progress in both antibiotic-resistant mechanisms and corresponding strategies to override resistance, biofilm-associated infections remain a huge challenge. Further studies in both basic science and clinics are needed to eradicate biofilm-associated, antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Novel small molecules possess great potential to deliver concrete anti-biofilm treatment, especially those that can efficiently inhibit the formation of biofilm up front. High-throughput chemical screens should be employed to identify novel chemicals with such properties. Screening for chemicals that inhibit quorum sensing, EPS production and multidrug efflux pumps are sound and promising directions that should all be given more research attention in the future.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
- Koo H, Allan RN, Howlin RP, Stoodley P, Hall-Stoodley L. 2017. Targeting microbial biofilms: current and prospective therapeutic strategies.
Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15: 740-755.
- Flemming H-C, Wingender J, Szewzyk U, Steinberg P, Rice SA, Kjelleberg S. 2016. Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life.
Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14: 563-575.
- de Vos WM. 2015. Microbial biofilms and the human intestinal microbiome.
Npj Biofilms Microbiomes 1: 15005.
- Percival SL, Suleman L, Vuotto C, Donelli G. 2015. Healthcare-associated infections, medical devices and biofilms: risk, tolerance and control.
J. Med. Microbiol. 64: 323-334.
- Miquel S, Lagrafeuille R, Souweine B, Forestier C. 2016. Anti-biofilm activity as a health issue.
Front. Microbiol. 7: 592.
- Lebeaux D, Ghigo JM, Beloin C. 2014. Biofilm-related infections: bridging the gap between clinical management and fundamental aspects of recalcitrance toward antibiotics.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 78: 510-543.
- Delcaru C, Alexandru I, Podgoreanu P, Grosu M, Stavropoulos E, Chifiriuc MC,
et al. 2016. Microbial biofilms in urinary tract infections and prostatitis: etiology, pathogenicity, and combating strategies. Pathogens 5: 65.
- Hobley L, Harkins C, MacPhee CE, Stanley-Wall NR. 2015. Giving structure to the biofilm matrix: an overview of individual strategies and emerging common themes.
FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39: 649-669.
- Flemming HC, Wingender J. 2010. The biofilm matrix.
Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8: 623-633.
- Jana S, Charlton SGV, Eland LE, Burgess JG, Wipat A, Curtis TP,
et al. 2020. Nonlinear rheological characteristics of single species bacterial biofilms. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 6: 19.
- Bak G, Young Lee J, Suk S, Kim D, Young Lee J, Kim K-s,
et al. 2015. Identification of novel sRNAs involved in biofilm formation, motility and fimbriae formation in Escherichia coli. Sci. Rep. 5: 15287.
- Ribet D, Cossart P. 2015. How bacterial pathogens colonize their hosts and invade deeper tissues.
Microbes Infect. 17: 173-183.
- Ligthart K, Belzer C, de Vos WM, Tytgat HLP. 2020. Bridging bacteria and the gut: functional aspects of type iv pili.
Trends Microbiol. 28: 340-348.
- Papenfort K, Bassler BL. 2016. Quorum sensing signal-response systems in Gram-negative bacteria.
Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14: 576-588.
- Hazan Z, Zumeris J, Jacob H, Raskin H, Kratysh G, Vishnia M,
et al. 2006. Effective prevention of microbial biofilm formation on medical devices by low-energy surface acoustic waves. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 4144-4152.
- Limoli DH, Jones CJ, Wozniak DJ. 2015. Bacterial extracellular polysaccharides in biofilm formation and function.
Microbiol. Spectr. 3: 10.1128/microbiolspec. MB-0011-2014.
- Jamal M, Ahmad W, Andleeb S, Jalil F, Imran M, Nawaz MA,
et al. 2018. Bacterial biofilm and associated infections. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 81: 7-11.
- Wannigama DL, Hurst C, Pearson L, Saethang T, Singkham-in U, Luk-in S,
et al. 2019. Simple fluorometric-based assay of antibiotic effectiveness for Acinetobacter baumanniibiofilms. Sci. Rep. 9: 6300.
- Nandakumar V, Chittaranjan S, Kurian VM, Doble M. 2012. Characteristics of bacterial biofilm associated with implant material in clinical practice.
Polymer J. 45: 137-142.
- Hathroubi S, Mekni MA, Domenico P, Nguyen D, Jacques M. 2017. Biofilms: microbial shelters against antibiotics.
Microb. Drug Resist. 23: 147-156.
- Yin W, Wang Y, Liu L, He J. 2019. Biofilms: the microbial "protective clothing" in extreme environments.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20: 3423.
- Tseng BS, Zhang W, Harrison JJ, Quach TP, Song JL, Penterman J,
et al. 2013. The extracellular matrix protects Pseudomonas aeruginosabiofilms by limiting the penetration of tobramycin. Environ. Microbiol. 15: 2865-2878.
- Zhou G, Shi Q-S, Huang X-M, Xie X-B. 2015. The three bacterial lines of defense against antimicrobial agents.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16: 21711-21733.
- Sharma D, Misba L, Khan AU. 2019. Antibiotics versus biofilm: an emerging battleground in microbial communities.
Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 8: 76.
- Stewart PS, Zhang T, Xu R, Pitts B, Walters MC, Roe F,
et al. 2016. Reaction-diffusion theory explains hypoxia and heterogeneous growth within microbial biofilms associated with chronic infections. Npj Biofilms Microbiomes 2: 16012.
- Singh S, Singh SK, Chowdhury I, Singh R. 2017. Understanding the mechanism of bacterial biofilms resistance to antimicrobial agents.
Open Microbiol. J. 11: 53-62.
- Miao Y, Zhou J, Chen C, Shen D, Song W, Feng Y. 2008. In vitro adsorption revealing an apparent strong interaction between endophyte
Pantoea agglomerans YS19and host rice. Curr. Microbiol. 57: 547-551.
- Li Q, Miao Y, Yi T, Zhou J, Lu Z, Feng Y. 2012. SPM43.1 contributes to acid-resistance of non-symplasmata-forming cells in
Pantoea agglomerans YS19. Curr. Microbiol. 64: 214-221.
- Zhao X, Yu Z, Ding T. 2020. Quorum-sensing regulation of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria.
Microorganisms 8: 425.
- Passos da Silva D, Schofield MC, Parsek MR, Tseng BS. 2017. An update on the sociomicrobiology of quorum sensing in gramnegative biofilm development.
Pathogens 6: 51.
- Rutherford ST, Bassler BL. 2012. Bacterial quorum sensing: its role in virulence and possibilities for its control.
Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2: a012427.
- Whiteley M, Diggle SP, Greenberg EP. 2017. Progress in and promise of bacterial quorum sensing research.
Nature 551: 313-320.
- Wolska KI, Grudniak AM, Rudnicka Z, Markowska K. 2016. Genetic control of bacterial biofilms.
J. Appl. Genet. 57: 225-238.
- Blanco P, Hernando-Amado S, Reales-Calderon JA, Corona F, Lira F, Alcalde-Rico M,
et al. 2016. Bacterial multidrug efflux pumps: Much more than antibiotic resistance determinants. Microorganisms 4: 14.
- Pena RT, Blasco L, Ambroa A, González-Pedrajo B, Fernández-García L, López M,
et al. 2019. Relationship between quorum sensing and secretion systems. Front. Microbiol. 10: 1100.
- Qian G, Zhou Y, Zhao Y, Song Z, Wang S, Fan J,
et al. 2013. Proteomic analysis reveals novel extracellular virulence-associated proteins and functions regulated by the diffusible signal factor (DSF) in Xanthomonas oryzaepv. oryzicola. J. Proteome Res. 12: 3327-3341.
- Jiang Q, Chen J, Yang C, Yin Y, Yao K. 2019. Quorum sensing: a prospective therapeutic target for bacterial diseases.
Biomed. Res. Int. 2019: 2015978.
- Hu M, Zhang C, Mu Y, Shen Q, Feng Y. 2010. Indole affects biofilm formation in bacteria.
Indian J. Microbiol. 50: 362-368.
- Yaikhan T, Chuerboon M, Tippayatham N, Atimuttikul N, Nuidate T, Yingkajorn M,
et al. 2019. Indole and derivatives modulate biofilm formation and antibiotic tolerance of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Indian J. Microbiol. 59: 460-467.
- Abisado RG, Benomar S, Klaus JR, Dandekar AA, Chandler JR. 2018. Bacterial quorum sensing and microbial community interactions.
mBio 9: e02331-17.
- Zhang J-W, Xuan C-G, Lu C-H, Guo S, Yu J-F, Asif M,
et al. 2019. AidB, a novel thermostable n-acylhomoserine lactonase from the Bacterium Boseasp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85: e02065-0.
- Blöcher R, Rodarte Ramírez A, Castro-Escarpulli G, Curiel-Quesada E, Reyes-Arellano A. 2018. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of alkyl-quinoxalin-2(1h)-one derivatives as anti-quorum sensing molecules, inhibiting biofilm formation in
Aeromonas caviaeSch3. Molecules 23: 3075.
- Wei Q, Bhasme P, Wang Z, Wang L, Wang S, Zeng Y,
et al. 2020. Chinese medicinal herb extract inhibits PQS-mediated quorum sensing system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 248: 112272.
- Van Acker H, Coenye T. 2016. The role of efflux and physiological adaptation in biofilm tolerance and resistance.
J. Biol. Chem. 291: 12565-12572.
- Zhang L, Mah TF. 2008. Involvement of a novel efflux system in biofilm-specific resistance to antibiotics.
J. Bacteriol. 190: 4447-4452.
- Ferrer-Espada R, Shahrour H, Pitts B, Stewart PS, Sánchez-Gómez S, Martínez-de-Tejada G. 2019. A permeability-increasing drug synergizes with bacterial efflux pump inhibitors and restores susceptibility to antibiotics in multi-drug resistant
Pseudomonas aeruginosastrains. Sci. Rep. 9: 3452.
- Liao J, Schurr MJ, Sauer K. 2013. The MerR-like regulator BrlR confers biofilm tolerance by activating multidrug efflux pumps in
Pseudomonas aeruginosabiofilms. J. Bacteriol. 195: 3352-3363.
- Kim J, Pitts B, Stewart PS, Camper A, Yoon J. 2008. Comparison of the antimicrobial effects of chlorine, silver ion, and tobramycin on biofilm.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 1446-1453.
- Alcalde-Rico M, Olivares-Pacheco J, Alvarez-Ortega C, Cámara M, Martínez JL. 2018. Role of the multidrug resistance efflux pump MexCD-OprJ in the
Pseudomonas aeruginosaquorum sensing response. Front. Microbiol. 9: 2752.
- Alcalde-Rico M, Olivares-Pacheco J, Halliday N, Cámara M, Martínez JL. 2020. The analysis of the role of MexAB-OprM on quorum sensing homeostasis shows that the apparent redundancy of
Pseudomonas aeruginosamultidrug efflux pumps allows keeping the robustness and the plasticity of this intercellular signaling network. bioRxiv: 2020.2003.2010.986737.
- He N, Hu J, Liu H, Zhu T, Huang B, Wang X,
et al. 2011. Enhancement of vancomycin activity against biofilms by using ultrasoundtargeted microbubble destruction. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55: 5331-5337.
- Harrison-Balestra C, Cazzaniga AL, Davis SC, Mertz PM. 2003. A wound-isolated
Pseudomonas aeruginosagrows a biofilm in vitro within 10 hours and is visualized by light microscopy. Dermatol. Surg. 29: 631-635.
- Wolcott RD, Rumbaugh KP, James G, Schultz G, Phillips P, Yang Q,
et al. 2010. Biofilm maturity studies indicate sharp debridement opens a time-dependent therapeutic window. J. Wound Care 19: 320-328.
- Vuotto C, Donelli G. 2019. Novel treatment strategies for biofilm-based infections.
Drugs 79: 1635-1655.
- Gunn JS, Bakaletz LO, Wozniak DJ. 2016. What's on the outside matters: the role of the extracellular polymeric substance of gramnegative biofilms in evading host immunity and as a target for therapeutic intervention.
J. Biol. Chem. 291: 12538-12546.
- Peng X, Zhang Y, Bai G, Zhou X, Wu H. 2016. Cyclic di-AMP mediates biofilm formation.
Mol. Microbiol. 99: 945-959.
- Ren Z, Cui T, Zeng J, Chen L, Zhang W, Xu X,
et al. 2016. Molecule targeting glucosyltransferase inhibits Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation and virulence. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 60: 126-135.
- Qvortrup K, Hultqvist LD, Nilsson M, Jakobsen TH, Jansen CU, Uhd J,
et al. 2019. Small molecule anti-biofilm agents developed on the basis of mechanistic understanding of biofilm formation. Front. Chem. 7: 742.
- Kaplan JB. 2014. Biofilm matrix-degrading enzymes.
Methods Mol. Biol. 1147: 203-213.
- Fleming D, Chahin L, Rumbaugh K. 2017. Glycoside hydrolases degrade polymicrobial bacterial biofilms in wounds.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61: e01998-16.
- Iwase T, Uehara Y, Shinji H, Tajima A, Seo H, Takada K,
et al. 2010. Staphylococcus epidermidisEsp inhibits Staphylococcus aureusbiofilm formation and nasal colonization. Nature 465: 346-349.
- Okshevsky M, Regina VR, Meyer RL. 2015. Extracellular DNA as a target for biofilm control.
Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 33: 73-80.
- Hymes SR, Randis TM, Sun TY, Ratner AJ. 2013. DNase inhibits
Gardnerella vaginalisbiofilms in vitro and in vivo. J. Infect. Dis. 207: 1491-1497.
- Baelo A, Levato R, Julian E, Crespo A, Astola J, Gavalda J,
et al. 2015. Disassembling bacterial extracellular matrix with DNase-coated nanoparticles to enhance antibiotic delivery in biofilm infections. J. Control. Release 209: 150-158.
- Brackman G, Coenye T. 2015. Quorum sensing inhibitors as anti-biofilm agents.
Curr. Pharm. Des. 21: 5-11.
- Kalia M, Yadav VK, Singh PK, Dohare S, Sharma D, Narvi SS,
et al. 2019. Designing quorum sensing inhibitors of Pseudomonas aeruginosautilizing FabI: an enzymic drug target from fatty acid synthesis pathway. 3 Biotech 9: 40.
- Zhang J, Wang J, Feng T, Du R, Tian X, Wang Y,
et al. 2019. Heterologous expression of the marine-derived quorum quenching enzyme moml can expand the antibacterial spectrum of Bacillus brevis. Mar. Drugs 17: 128.
- Luo J, Dong B, Wang K, Cai S, Liu T, Cheng X,
et al. 2017. Baicalin inhibits biofilm formation, attenuates the quorum sensingcontrolled virulence and enhances Pseudomonas aeruginosaclearance in a mouse peritoneal implant infection model. PLoS One 12: e0176883.
- Sun B, Zhang M. 2016. Analysis of the antibacterial effect of an
Edwardsiella tardaLuxS inhibitor. Springerplus 5: 92-92.
- McBrayer DN, Cameron CD, Tal-Gan Y. 2020. Development and utilization of peptide-based quorum sensing modulators in Grampositive bacteria.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 18: 7273-7290.
- de la Fuente-Nunez C, Cardoso MH, de Souza Candido E, Franco OL, Hancock RE. 2016. Synthetic antibiofilm peptides.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1858: 1061-1069.
- Asfour HZ. 2018. Anti-quorum sensing natural compounds.
J. Microsc. Ultrastruct. 6: 1-10.
- Paul D, Gopal J, Kumar M, Manikandan M. 2018. Nature to the natural rescue: silencing microbial chats.
Chem. Biol. Interact. 280: 86-98.
- Defoirdt T. 2018. Quorum-sensing systems as targets for antivirulence therapy.
Trends Microbiol. 26: 313-328.
- Donlan RM. 2009. Preventing biofilms of clinically relevant organisms using bacteriophage.
Trends Microbiol. 17: 66-72.
- Jamal M, Hussain T, Das CR, Andleeb S. 2015. Characterization of Siphoviridae phage Z and studying its efficacy against multidrugresistant
Klebsiella pneumoniaeplanktonic cells and biofilm. J. Med. Microbiol. 64: 454-462.
- O'Flaherty S, Ross RP, Meaney W, Fitzgerald GF, Elbreki MF, Coffey A. 2005. Potential of the polyvalent anti-
Staphylococcusbacteriophage K for control of antibiotic-resistant staphylococci from hospitals. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 1836-1842.
- Cerca N, Oliveira R, Azeredo J. 2007. Susceptibility of
Staphylococcus epidermidisplanktonic cells and biofilms to the lytic action of staphylococcus bacteriophage K. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 45: 313-317.
- Chan BK, Abedon ST. 2015. Bacteriophages and their enzymes in biofilm control.
Curr. Pharm. Des. 21: 85-99.
- Abedon ST. 2019. Use of phage therapy to treat long-standing, persistent, or chronic bacterial infections.
Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 145: 18-39.
- Lee NY, Ko WC, Hsueh PR. 2019. Nanoparticles in the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
Front. Pharmacol. 10: 1153.
- Hetrick EM, Shin JH, Paul HS, Schoenfisch MH. 2009. Anti-biofilm efficacy of nitric oxide-releasing silica nanoparticles.
Biomaterials 30: 2782-2789.
- Rai MK, Deshmukh SD, Ingle AP, Gade AK. 2012. Silver nanoparticles: the powerful nanoweapon against multidrug-resistant bacteria.
J. Appl. Microbiol. 112: 841-852.
- Caubet R, Pedarros-Caubet F, Chu M, Freye E, de Belem Rodrigues M, Moreau JM,
et al. 2004. A radio frequency electric current enhances antibiotic efficacy against bacterial biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 4662-4664.
- Niepa THR, Wang H, Gilbert JL, Ren D. 2017. Eradication of
Pseudomonas aeruginosacells by cathodic electrochemical currents delivered with graphite electrodes. Acta Biomater. 50: 344-352.
- Dusane DH, Lochab V, Jones T, Peters CW, Sindeldecker D, Das A,
et al. 2019. Electroceutical treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosabiofilms. Sci. Rep. 9: 2008.
- Tursi SA, Puligedda RD, Szabo P, Nicastro LK, Miller AL, Qiu C,
et al. 2020. SalmonellaTyphimurium biofilm disruption by a human antibody that binds a pan-amyloid epitope on curli. Nat. Commun. 11: 1007.
- Rasko DA, Sperandio V. 2010. Anti-virulence strategies to combat bacteria-mediated disease.
Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9: 117-128.
- Ghosh A, Jayaraman N, Chatterji D. 2020. Small-molecule inhibition of bacterial biofilm.
ACS Omega 5: 3108-3115.
- Cavalheiro M, Teixeira MC. 2018. Candida biofilms: threats, challenges, and promising Strategies.
Front. Med. (Lausanne) 5: 28.
- Verderosa AD, Totsika M, Fairfull-Smith KE. 2019. Bacterial biofilm eradication agents: a current review.
Front. Chem. 7: 824.