전체메뉴
검색
Article Search

JMB Journal of Microbiolog and Biotechnology

QR Code QR Code

Research article


References

  1. Komisarek J, Dorynek Z. 2002. Genetic aspects of twinning in cattle. J. Appl. Genet. 43: 55-68.
  2. Crowe MA, Hostens M, Opsomer G. 2018. Reproductive management in dairy cows - the future. Ir. Vet. J. 71: 1.
    Pubmed PMC
  3. Foote RH. 2002. The history of artificial insemination: Selected notes and notables. J. Anim. Sci. 80: 1-10.
  4. Moore SG, Hasler JF. 2017. A 100-Year review: reproductive technologies in dairy science. J. Dairy Sci. 100: 10314-10331.
    Pubmed
  5. Baruselli PS, Catussi BLC, Abreu LÂD, Elliff FM, Silva LGD, Batista EDOS. 2019. Challenges to increase the AI and ET markets in Brazil. Anim. Reprod. 16: 364-375.
    Pubmed PMC
  6. Binyameen M, Saleem M, Riaz A. 2019. Recent trends in bovine reproductive biotechnologies. CAB Rev. 14: 1-10.
  7. López-Gatius F. 2012. Factors of a noninfectious nature affecting fertility after artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows. A review. Theriogenology 77: 1029-1041.
    Pubmed
  8. Burns BM, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG. 2010. A review of factors that impact on the capacity of beef cattle females to conceive, maintain a pregnancy and wean a calf - implications for reproductive efficiency in northern Australia. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 122: 1-22.
    Pubmed PMC
  9. Bijker I, Christley RM, Smith RF, Dobson H. 2015. Effect of signs of oestrus, disease stressors and cow activity on pregnancy rate following artificial insemination. Vet. Rec. 176: 411.
    Pubmed
  10. Rodrigues NF, Kästle J, Coutinho TJD, Amorim AT, Campos GB, Santos VM, et al. 2015. Qualitative analysis of the vaginal microbiota of healthy cattle and cattle with genital-tract. Genet. Mol. Res. 14: 6518-6528.
    Pubmed
  11. Gonzalez Moreno C, Fontana C, Cocconcelli PS, Callegari ML, Otero MC. 2016. Vaginal microbial communities from synchronized heifers and cows with reproductive disorders. J. Appl. Microbiol. 121: 1232-1241.
    Pubmed
  12. Gilbert RO. 2019. Symposium review: Mechanisms of disruption of fertility by infectious diseases of the reproductive tract. J. Dairy Sci. 102: 3754-3765.
    Pubmed
  13. Singer M, Borg M, Ouburg S, Morré SA. 2019. The relation of the vaginal microbiota to early pregnancy development during in vitro fertilization treatment-A meta-analysis. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 48: 223-229.
    Pubmed
  14. Ault TB, Clemmons BA, Reese ST, Dantas FG, Franco GA, Smith TP, et al. 2019. Uterine and vaginal bacterial community diversity prior to artificial insemination between pregnant and nonpregnant postpartum cows. J. Anim. Sci. 97: 4298-4304.
    Pubmed
  15. Deng F, McClure M, Rorie R, Wang X, Chai J, Wei X, et al. 2019. The vaginal and fecal microbiomes are related to pregnancy status in beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 10: 92.
    Pubmed PMC
  16. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. 2019. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37: 852-857.
  17. Amir A, McDonald D, Navas-Molina JA, Kopylova E, Morton JT, Xu ZZ, et al. 2017. Deblur rapidly resolves single-nucleotide community sequence patterns. MSystems 2: e00191-00116.
    Pubmed PMC
  18. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. 2007. Naïve bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 5261-5267.
    Pubmed PMC
  19. McKight PE, Najab J. 2010. Kruskal-Wallis test. pp. 1. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (eds Weiner IB, Craighead WE).
  20. Anderson MJ, Walsh DC. 2013. PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and the mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions: what null hypothesis are you testing? Ecol. Monogr. 83: 557-574.
  21. Paulson JN, Stine OC, Bravo HC, Pop M. 2013. Differential abundance analysis for microbial marker-gene surveys. Nat. Methods 10: 1200-1202.
    Pubmed PMC
  22. Gajer P, Brotman RM, Bai G, Sakamoto J, Schütte UM, Zhong X, et al. 2012. Temporal dynamics of the human vaginal microbiota. Sci. Transl. Med. 4: 132ra152.
    Pubmed PMC
  23. van de Wijgert JH, Borgdorff H, Verhelst R, Crucitti T, Francis S, Verstraelen H, et al. 2014. The vaginal microbiota: what have we learned after a decade of molecular characterization? PLoS One 9: e105998.
    Pubmed PMC
  24. Kyrgiou M, Mitra A, Moscicki AB. 2017. Does the vaginal microbiota play a role in the development of cervical cancer? Transl. Res. 179: 168-182.
    Pubmed PMC
  25. Smith SB, Ravel J. 2017. The vaginal microbiota, host defence and reproductive physiology. J. Physiol. 595: 451-463.
    Pubmed PMC
  26. Haahr T, Jensen JS, Thomsen L, Duus L, Rygaard K, Humaidan P. 2016. Abnormal vaginal microbiota may be associated with poor reproductive outcomes: a prospective study in IVF patients. Hum. Reprod. 31: 795-803.
    Pubmed
  27. Ling Z, Kong J, Liu F, Zhu H, Chen X, Wang Y, et al. 2010. Molecular analysis of the diversity of vaginal microbiota associated with bacterial vaginosis. BMC Genomics 11: 488.
    Pubmed PMC
  28. Smith A, Chousalkar KK, Chenoweth PC. 2012. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of ureaplasma diversum from urogenital swabs in cattle in Australia. Aust. Vet. J. 90: 275-276.
    Pubmed

Related articles in JMB

More Related Articles